Next Article in Journal
Development of Importance Measures Reflecting the Risk Triplet in Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment: A Case Study Using MELCOR and RAPID
Previous Article in Journal
Review: Pipeline Layout Effect on the Wall Thinning of Mihama Nuclear Power Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultra-Cold Neutrons in qBounce Experiments as Laboratory for Test of Chameleon Field Theories and Cosmic Acceleration

by
Derar Altarawneh
1,*,† and
Roman Höllwieser
2,†
1
Department of Applied Physics, Tafila Technical University, Tafila 66110, Jordan
2
Atominstitut, Technische Universität Wien, Stadionallee 2, A-1020 Wien, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Nucl. Eng. 2025, 6(3), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/jne6030020
Submission received: 21 April 2025 / Revised: 4 June 2025 / Accepted: 13 June 2025 / Published: 26 June 2025

Abstract

The study of scalar field theories like the chameleon field model is of increasing interest due to the Universe’s accelerated expansion, which is believed to be caused in part by dark energy. These fields can elude experimental bounds set on them in high-density environments since they interact with matter in a density-dependent way. This paper analyzes the effect of chameleon fields on the quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons (UCNs) in qBounce experiments with mirrors. We discuss the deformation of the neutron wave function due to chameleon interactions and quantum systems in potential wells from gravitational forces and chameleon fields. Unlike other works that aim to put bounds on the chameleon field parameters, this work focuses on the quantum mechanics of the chameleonic neutron. The results deepen our understanding of the interplay between quantum states and modified gravity, as well as fundamental physics experiments carried out in the laboratory.

1. Introduction

In spite of the confirmation of the existence of the cosmic acceleration and a cosmological constant Λ [1] and the simplest explanation of the cosmological constant [2,3,4,5], there remain some questions [6], which may find the answers within the single scalar field theory—the chameleon field theory [7,8,9,10]. A chameleon field has been suggested to drive the current phase of cosmic acceleration for a large class of scalar potentials. A chameleon field coupled to an ambient matter acquires an effective mass, depending on the matter density, and becomes heavier in the more dense matter. Thus, the properties of a chameleon field depend on the density of matter to which it is immersed. Because of this sensitivity to the environment, the scalar field was called chameleon, and it can couple directly to baryons and leptons with gravitational strength on Earth but it would be essentially massless on solar system scales [7,8,9,10,11].
Dark energy, interpreted as negative pressure causing the Universe’s acceleration, may originate from a chameleon field, which is responsible for inflating the Universe [12,13,14,15]. A competing possibility is that the acceleration is due to a modification of gravity, i.e., the left-hand side of Einstein’s equation rather than the right. Observations, which can distinguish these two possibilities are desirable, since measurements of expansion kinematics alone are not able to.
As has been pointed out in [16,17,18], ultra-cold neutrons, bouncing in the gravitational field of the Earth above a mirror [16] and between two mirrors [17,18], can be a good laboratory for testing the existence of a chameleon field. As has been shown theoretically [19,20,21] and observed experimentally [22,23,24,25], ultra-cold neutrons in the gravitational field of the Earth possess quantum gravitational bound states with binding energies of order 10 12 eV . The transitions between quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons, bouncing in the gravitational field of the Earth above a mirror and between two mirrors, were measured in [18,26,27,28], respectively. It has been found [17,18] that for the dependence of the sensitivity of the experimental data on the transition frequencies of the quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons for the chameleon–matter coupling constant, which is usually called β , the strong and weak coupling regime may be realised. The former is in agreement with the estimates obtained in [29,30] from the experimental data on the gravitational torsion balance.
The problem of applications of a chameleon field to the analysis of the observable phenomena in the universe and in the terrestrial laboratories depends strongly on the definition of the self-interaction of a chameleon field. Such a self-interaction plays an important role in the mechanism of the spontaneous creation of the effective mass of a chameleon field. According to [7,31,32,33,34,35,36], for the analysis of the properties of a massless chameleon field, one may use the potentials of the self-interaction of a chameleon, which we denote as V ( ϕ ) ϕ n with positive powers n and V ( ϕ ) ϕ 4 , respectively.
Below, we analyse a chameleon field within the ϕ n -theory with the potential of the self-interaction of a chameleon field V ( ϕ ) = Λ 4 ( 1 + Λ n / ϕ n ) with Λ = 2.4 × 10 3 eV [7,17,31,32,33,34,35]. In turn, from the experimental data on the transition frequencies of quantum gravitational states [18], one could obtain the estimate on the chameleon–matter coupling constant β < 5 × 10 9 .
Experimental studies have placed stringent constraints on chameleon field theories. The qBOUNCE collaboration has reported an upper bound on the chameleon–matter coupling constant, restricting it to ( β < 6.9 × 10 6 ) [37]. Additionally, independent experiments by [38] have set strong upper limits on the chameleon field, while experiments conducted by Eric Adelberger et al. [29] have constrained it from below. The combination of these results suggests that the chameleon field, in its original formulation, is largely ruled out as a viable explanation for cosmic acceleration. Given this, our study does not aim to refine these existing bounds but instead focuses on a detailed quantum mechanical analysis of how a chameleon field influences the gravitationally bound quantum states of ultra-cold neutrons. By investigating neutron wave function deformations in a confined environment, we provide insights into the interplay between modified gravity models and quantum mechanics, which remains relevant for broader tests of fundamental physics.
In this paper, we investigate the contribution of a chameleon field to the wave function of ultra-cold neutrons moving above a mirror. This results in a qualitative phenomenon, related to the deformation of the wave function of ultra-cold neutrons, which may be observed experimentally in the Quantum Bouncing Ball (QBB) experiments [39,40,41], i.e., a measurement of the time evolution of the Schrödinger wave function of ultra-cold neutrons, bouncing above a mirror.
The calculation of the chameleon field is adapted to the experimental setup used in [39,40,41]; see Figure 1. Ultra-cold neutrons move with a along the x-axis with a velocity v 0 between a scatter (upper yellow) mirror (lower red) system in the spatial region, which we define as z 2 d 2 4 [17]. Then, at the edge, which we localise at x = 0 [39,40,41], ultra-cold neutrons fall down from the height h = D d 2 + h 1 above a mirror, localised at z = D . The height h 1 = 0 ξ 1 = 13.71 μm is related to the ground quantum gravitational state with the binding energy E 1 = m g h 1 = m g 0 ξ 1 = 0.602 ξ 1 peV = 1.412 peV , where 0 = ( 2 m 2 g ) 1 / 3 = 5.87 μm (see Appendix A), is the scale of the quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons in the gravitational field of the Earth [19,20,21] and ξ 1 = 2.34497 (see Appendix A and [17]). For the numerical analysis, we take v 0 = 6 m / s [41], d = 25.5 μm [28] and D d 2 = 47 μm. Since the binding energy of the first excited gravitational state of ultra-cold neutrons is equal to E 2 = m g h 2 = m g 0 ξ 2 = 2.614 peV , with ξ 2 = 4.34177 corresponding to the height h 2 = 0 ξ 2 = 25.5 μm, the distance d = 25.5 μm allows us to select, between two mirrors, ultra-cold neutrons only in the ground gravitational state.
This paper is organised as follows. In Section 2, we construct the wave function of ultra-cold neutrons in the ground quantum gravitational state, moving between two mirrors in the spatial region z 2 d 2 4 , and define the wave function of ultra-cold neutrons in the spatial region z D above a mirror. We show that the main contributions come from the excited states with a principal quantum number k = 6 , k = 7 , and k = 8 . In Section 3, we calculate a first-order correction to the wave functions of ultra-cold neutrons, induced by a chameleon field. From a unitarity condition, we obtain a new estimate on the chameleon–matter coupling constant β 6.5 × 10 8 . We discuss the obtained results in Section 4 and conclude in Section 6. In Appendix A, we define the wave function of the ground quantum gravitational state of ultra-cold neutrons between two mirrors in the spatial region z 2 d 2 4 and above a mirror in the spatial region z D , respectively.

2. Wave Function of Ultra-Cold Neutrons Above a Mirror

For the analysis of the evolution of the wave function of ultra-cold neutrons in the spatial region above a mirror, we assume that (1) ultra-cold neutrons start to fall at t = 0 and (2) before the fall the time evolution and the x–degree of freedom of ultra-cold neutrons are described by the Gaussian wave packet with a width δ = 1 μm [39,40,41]. At time t, the wave function of ultra-cold neutrons takes the form
ψ 1 ( z , x , t ) = ψ 1 ( z ) ( 4 π δ 2 ) 1 / 4 + d p 2 π e δ 2 ( p p 0 ) 2 2 × e i ( E 1 + p 2 2 m ) t + i p x = ψ 1 ( z ) δ 2 π δ t 4 1 / 4 e ( x v 0 t ) 2 2 δ t 2 × e i ( E 1 + p 0 2 2 m ) t + i p 0 x ,
where the wave function ψ 1 ( z ) is given in Appendix A and δ t = δ 1 + i t / m δ 2 . The squared absolute value | ψ 1 ( z , x , t ) | 2 is
| ψ 1 ( z , x , t ) | 2 = | ψ 1 ( z ) | 2 1 π Δ t 2 e ( x v 0 t ) 2 2 Δ t 2 ,
where Δ t = δ 1 + t 2 / m 2 δ 4 .
Since in the spatial region between two mirrors z 2 d 2 4 , ultra-cold neutrons are only in the ground quantum gravitational state with the wave function, and the excited quantum gravitational states do not exist, the first-order correction to the wave function of the ground quantum gravitational state, induced by a chameleon field, appears only as a phase shift of the wave function [42].
In the spatial region z D , the pure ground gravitational state ψ 1 ( z , x , t ) should be treated as a mixed quantum gravitational state with the wave function of the z-degree of freedom given by
ψ 1 ( z , t ) = k C k Ψ k ( z , t ) ,
where ψ 1 ( z , t ) = ψ 1 ( z ) e i E 1 t , Ψ k ( z , t ) = Ψ k ( z ) e i E k t with the wave functions Ψ k ( z ) , given in Appendix A, and the coefficients C k are given by
C k = d / 2 + d / 2 d z Ψ k * ( z ) ψ 1 ( z ) .
The integrals are calculated over the spatial region z 2 d 2 4 , since the wave function ψ 1 ( z ) vanishes in the spatial region z 2 d 2 4 . The binding energies of the first quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons and the values of the coefficients C k for k = 1 , 2 , , 15 are adduced in Table A1 in Appendix A. One may see that the main contribution to the mixed state comes from the quantum gravitational states with k = 6 , k = 7 , and k = 8 with coefficients C 6 = 0.42 , C 7 = 0.66 , and C 8 = 0.55 , and probabilities P 6 = | C 6 | 2 = 0.18 , P 7 = | C 7 | 2 = 0.44 , and P 8 = | C 8 | 2 = 0.30 , respectively. For the analysis of the first-order corrections to the wave functions of ultra-cold neutrons, caused by a chameleon field, we will use the following approximation of the wave function ψ 1 ( z , t )
ψ 1 ( z , t ) = C 6 Ψ 6 ( z , t ) + C 7 Ψ 7 ( z , t ) + C 8 Ψ 8 ( z , t ) ,
which describes the exact wave function with an accuracy of about 8 % . In this analysis, we treat the neutron wavefunction within the mirror gap as unperturbed by the chameleon field. This assumption is based on the fact that the region between the two mirrors is spatially narrow and bounded by dense materials, which significantly screen the chameleon field. In such confined environments, the scalar field tends toward a constant value, and its contribution to the potential becomes effectively uniform. As a result, it induces only a global phase shift in the wavefunction, which has no measurable impact on observables such as transition probabilities or spatial distributions. Therefore, within this region, we adopt the standard approximation of neglecting chameleon-induced modifications to the wavefunction. Perturbative corrections due to the chameleon field are introduced only after the neutron exits the confined region, in the spatial domain z D , where the field is no longer screened and exhibits spatial variation. This treatment is consistent with previous work, such as Ivanov et al. [17], and ensures a physically justified separation between the unperturbed and perturbed regimes.

3. Chameleon Field Correction in the ϕ n -Theory

The potential of a chameleon field, coupled to ultra-cold neutrons, takes the form [16,17]
Φ ( z ) = β m M Pl ϕ ( z ) ,
where M Pl = 2.435 × 10 27 eV is the Planck mass, β is a chameleon–matter coupling constant, and ϕ ( z ) is the profile of a chameleon field in the spatial region z D . As has been shown in [18], the chameleon–matter coupling constant obeys the constraint β < 5 × 10 9 . As has been shown in [16,17], in the spatial region z D , the profile of a chameleon field, obtained as a solution of the non-linear equations of motion in the ϕ n -theory and in the strong coupling limit β 10 5 , takes the form
ϕ ( z ) = Λ n + 2 2 2 n + 2 1 + z D 2 n + 2 ,
where Λ = 2.4 × 10 3 eV [7,16,17,31,32,33,34]. For D = 59.75 μm we may define the chameleon field potential as
Φ ( z ) = m g 0 C ϕ ϕ ( z ) Λ ,
where C ϕ = β m Λ / M pl m g 0 = 1.54 × 10 9 β and
ϕ ( z ) Λ = n + 2 2 2 n + 2 1 + z D 2 n + 2 .
For the estimate β < 5 × 10 9 [18], the coupling constant C ϕ is C ϕ < 7.7 . The power n of the potential of a self-interaction of a chameleon field is a free parameter of the ϕ n -theory of a chameleon field. For n 2 the accuracy of the approximation Equation (8) is better than 1.5 % .
The wave function Ψ k ( z , t ) of ultra-cold neutrons, including the first-order corrections induced by a chameleon field, takes the form
Ψ k ( z , t ) Ψ k ( z , t ) + C ϕ k k a k k ( n ) Ψ k ( z , t ) ,
where we have denoted
a k k ( n ) = 0 D n + 2 2 2 n + 2 k | ξ 2 n + 2 | k ζ k ζ k , k | ξ 2 n + 2 | k = 0 + d ξ Ψ k ( ξ ) ξ 2 n + 2 Ψ k ( ξ )
with ξ = ( D + z ) / 0 . For the excited states Ψ k ( z , t ) with the principal quantum number k = 6 , 7, and 8, we obtain the following corrections
Ψ 6 ( z , t ) + C ϕ a 76 ( n ) Ψ 7 ( z , t ) + C ϕ a 86 ( n ) Ψ 8 ( z , t ) , Ψ 7 ( z , t ) + C ϕ a 67 ( n ) Ψ 6 ( z , t ) + C ϕ a 87 ( n ) Ψ 8 ( z , t ) , Ψ 8 ( z , t ) + C ϕ a 68 ( n ) Ψ 6 ( z , t ) + C ϕ a 78 ( n ) Ψ 7 ( z , t ) .
The wave function of the mixed state take the form
ψ 1 ( z , t ) C ¯ 6 Ψ 6 ( z , t ) + C ¯ 7 Ψ 7 ( z , t ) + C ¯ 8 Ψ 8 ( z , t ) ,
where the coefficients C ¯ k for k = 6 , 7, and 8 are equal to
C ¯ 6 = C 6 + C ϕ ( C 7 a 67 ( n ) + C 8 a 68 ( n ) ) , C ¯ 7 = C 7 + C ϕ ( C 6 a 76 ( n ) + C 8 a 78 ( n ) ) , C ¯ 8 = C 8 + C ϕ ( C 6 a 86 ( n ) + C 7 a 87 ( n ) ) .
The coefficients C ¯ k must obey the unitarity conditions
| C ¯ k | < 1 for k = 6 , 7 , 8 ; | C ¯ 6 | 2 + | C ¯ 7 | 2 + | C ¯ 8 | 2 < 1 .
Such a constraint may be used for the estimate of the chameleon–matter coupling constant β . Figure 2 illustrates the dependence of the coefficients C k ( D ) on the distance D = h + d / 2 for quantum states k = 1 20 .
A numerical analysis shows that the contribution of a 86 ( n ) can be neglected in comparison with the contributions of a 67 ( n ) and a 87 ( n ) . Then, a 67 ( n ) = a 76 ( n ) and a 87 ( n ) = a 78 ( n ) . The behaviour of a 67 ( n ) and a 87 ( n ) as functions of n for n [ 2 , 10 ] is shown in Figure 3. One may see that a 67 ( n ) a 87 ( n ) . Using the obtained relations, the coefficients C ¯ k are
C ¯ 6 = C 6 + C ϕ C 7 a 67 ( n ) , C ¯ 7 = C 7 + C ϕ ( C 8 C 6 ) a 67 ( n ) , C ¯ 8 = C 8 C ϕ C 7 a 67 ( n )
or
C ¯ 6 = C 6 + 1.54 × 10 9 β C 7 a 67 ( n ) , C ¯ 7 = C 7 + 1.54 × 10 9 β ( C 8 C 6 ) a 67 ( n ) , C ¯ 8 = C 8 1.54 × 10 9 β C 7 a 67 ( n )
One may see that the first-order perturbation theory, with respect to the coupling constant C ϕ = 1.54 × 10 9 β 1 , the constraint
| C ¯ 6 | 2 + | C ¯ 7 | 2 + | C ¯ 8 | 2 = | C 6 | 2 + | C 7 | 2 + | C 8 | 2 < 1
is fulfilled. However, for the upper bound β < 5 × 10 9 on the chameleon–matter coupling constant, we obtain that C ϕ < 7.69 . Since this violates a perturbative analysis of the wave functions of ultra-cold neutrons, the upper bound on the coupling constant β should be substantially decreased. Using the numerical values of the coefficients C k for k = 6 , 7 , 8 , we obtain
C ¯ 6 = 0.42 + 1.02 × 10 9 β a 67 ( n ) , C ¯ 7 = 0.66 + 0.20 × 10 9 β a 67 ( n ) , C ¯ 8 = 0.55 1.02 × 10 9 β a 67 ( n ) .
and new formulas for n = 2 and h = 47
C ¯ 5 = 0.15 + 0.37 × 10 9 β C ¯ 6 = 0.42 + 0.13 × 10 9 β C ¯ 7 = 0.66 1.80 × 10 9 β C ¯ 8 = 0.55 + 2.01 × 10 9 β C ¯ 10 = 0.17 0.06 × 10 9 β
A reasonable upper bound on the coupling constant C ϕ compatible with a perturbative analysis of contributions of a chameleon field is
C ϕ a 67 ( n ) = 1.54 × 10 9 β a 67 ( n ) 0.1 .
Equation (21) does not represent an experimentally derived constraint on the chameleon–matter coupling constant β . Rather, it defines a theoretical upper limit that ensures the validity of the first-order perturbative treatment employed in this analysis. Equation (21) gives a new upper bound on the chameleon–matter coupling constant β 6.5 × 10 8 , which is of an order of magnitude smaller compared with the upper bound β < 5 × 10 9 , obtained in [18] from the transition frequencies of quantum gravitational states of an ultra-cold neutron, confined between two mirrors. For the upper bound Equation (21), the coefficients C ¯ k with k = 6 , 7 , 8 are
0.42 C ¯ 6 0.49 , 0.66 C ¯ 7 0.67 , 0.55 C ¯ 8 0.48
with the sum of the squared absolute values equal to | C ¯ 6 | 2 + | C ¯ 7 | 2 + | C ¯ 8 | 2 = 0.92 .
The estimates of the coefficients C ¯ k with k = 6 , 7 , 8 may be extracted from the experimental data [28] on a free fall of ultra-cold neutrons in the spatial region z D above a mirror with the wave function
| Ψ ( z , x , t ) | 2 = | C ¯ 6 Ψ 6 ( z , t ) + C ¯ 7 Ψ 7 ( z , t ) + C ¯ 8 Ψ 8 ( z , t ) | 2 × 1 π Δ t 2 e ( x v 0 t ) 2 2 Δ t 2 .
The experimental data on a free fall of ultra-cold neutrons from [18] may be fitted by only one parameter κ = 0.20 × 10 9 β a 67 ( n ) , defining the coefficients C ¯ k as follows C ¯ 6 = 0.42 + 5 κ , C ¯ 7 = 0.66 + κ , and C ¯ 8 = 0.55 5 κ , respectively.

4. Discussion

We have analysed a quantum free fall of ultra-cold neutrons from the gap of a spatial region z 2 d 2 4 between two mirrors with d = 25.5 μm into the spatial region above a mirror, located at z = D below the lower mirror at D = 47 μm. Between two mirrors, ultra-cold neutrons are prepared in the ground quantum gravitational state and move with a velocity v 0 = 6 m / s in the x-direction with the wave function, taken in the form of a Gaussian wave packet. For a depth D d 2 = 47 μm of a spatial region of a quantum free fall, we have shown that the wave function of the z-degrees of freedom of ultra-cold neutrons can be approximated by a superposition of three excited quantum gravitational states with the principal quantum numbers k = 6 , 7 , and 8 with coefficients C 6 = 0.42 , C 7 = 0.66 , and C 8 = 0.55 , respectively. The probability of an observation of ultra-cold neutrons in such a mixed quantum gravitational state is P = | C 6 | 2 + | C 7 | 2 + | C 8 | 2 = 92 . Using perturbation theory, we calculated the first-order corrections to the wave functions of ultra-cold neutrons in the spatial region of a quantum free fall. A numerical analysis shows that the main contributions to the wave function of the z-degrees of freedom of ultra-cold neutrons appear only to three excited quantum gravitational with the principal quantum numbers k = 6 , 7 , and 8 and from these excited states. The contributions of a chameleon field changes the coefficients C k with k = 6 , 7 , and 8, as follows C 6 C ¯ 6 + 5 κ , C 7 C ¯ 7 0.66 + κ , and C 8 C ¯ 8 = 0.55 5 κ , where κ = 0.20 × 10 9 β a 67 ( n ) and a 67 ( n ) is a function of the power n of the potential of a self-interaction of a chameleon field 0.2 a 67 0.1 for n [ 2 , 10 ] . A perturbative analysis of the contributions of a chameleon field assumes that the effective coupling constant C ϕ = 1.54 × 10 9 β is much smaller compared with unity, i.e., C ϕ 1 . For the estimate β < 5 × 10 9 , we obtain C ϕ < 7.7 . Since this value is not compatible with a perturbative analysis of a chameleon field and violates the unitarity condition on the coefficients C ¯ 6 , C ¯ 7 , and C ¯ 8 , i.e., | C ¯ k | 2 < 1 and | C ¯ 6 | 2 + | C ¯ 7 | 2 + | C ¯ 8 | 2 < 1 , the estimate β < 5 × 10 9 should be improved in agreement with a perturbative analysis of chameleon field and a unitarity condition. A reasonable theoretical upper bound on the effective coupling constant C ϕ 0.1 compatible with a unitarity condition of the coefficients C ¯ 6 , C ¯ 7 , and C ¯ 8 leads to a new constraint on the chameleon–matter coupling constant β , i.e., β 6.5 × 10 8 , which is of order of magnitude smaller compared with the estimate β < 5 × 10 9 [18]. A new upper bound β 6.5 × 10 8 is compatible with the experimental data on the transition frequencies of quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons [18] at the level of a sensitivity S = Δ ω / ω 0.6 % . For the theoretical transitions | 6 | 7 and | 7 | 8 , the upper bound β 6.5 × 10 8 may be observed for the sensitivities S 67 0.6 and S 78 1.5 % , respectively.
With the stability of the new upper bound β 6.5 × 10 8 , one may prove by varying the depth of a quantum free-fall region. Indeed, decreasing the depth of a quantum free-fall region to D = 30 μm leads to the following approximation of the wave function ψ 1 ( z ) , owing an approximation of the wave function ψ 1 ( z , t )
ψ 1 ( z , t ) = C 3 Ψ 3 ( z , t ) + C 4 Ψ 4 ( z , t ) + C 5 Ψ 5 ( z , t )
with the coefficients equal to C 3 = 0.28 , C 4 = C 5 = 0.66 . In the region of a quantum free fall, ultra-cold neutrons are in the mixed state, described by the wave function Equation (24), with a probability P = | C 3 | 2 + | C 4 | 2 + | C 5 | 2 = 0.95 . The contributions of a chameleon field are given by C ¯ 3 = 0.28 + 0.99 κ , C ¯ 4 = 0.66 1.22 κ and C ¯ 4 = 0.66 + 1.22 κ , where κ = 1.54 × 10 9 β a 54 ( n ) . The function a 54 ( n ) varies over the region 0.06 a 54 0.03 for n [ 2 , 10 ] . One may show that the upper bound β < 5 × 10 9 , obtained in [18], violates a unitarity condition, whereas a new upper bound β 6.5 × 10 8 , obtained above, does not violate a unitarity. It is also compatible with a perturbative analysis of the contributions of a chameleon field. At β 6.5 × 10 8 the coefficients C ¯ k are defined by the inequalities 0.28 C ¯ 3 0.33 , 0.66 C ¯ 4 0.59 , and 0.66 C ¯ 3 0.70 , and describe the mixed state Equation (24) of ultra-cold neutrons with the probability P = | C ¯ 3 | 2 + | C ¯ 4 | 2 + | C ¯ 5 | 2 = 0.95 .
An increase in the depth of the quantum free-fall region, for example to D = 70 μm, leads to a mixed quantum gravitational state of ultra-cold neutrons, which should contain a complete set of pure quantum gravitational states Ψ k ( z , t ) . A truncated wave function, containing the contributions of the state Ψ k ( z , t ) with the largest coefficients, takes the form
ψ 1 ( z , t ) = C 10 Ψ 10 ( z , t ) + C 11 Ψ 4 ( z , t ) + C 13 Ψ 13 ( z , t ) ,
with C 10 = 0.35 , C 11 = 0.58 , and C 13 = 0.14 , respectively. The probability of an observation of ultra-cold neutrons in the state with the wave function Equation (25) is P = | C 10 | 2 + | C 11 | 2 + | C 13 | 2 = 0.48 . For the analysis of a contribution of a chameleon field, we may neglect the contribution of the wave function Ψ 13 ( z , t ) . The probability of the state with the wave function ψ 1 ( z , t ) = C 10 Ψ 10 ( z , t ) + C 11 Ψ 4 ( z , t ) is P = | C 10 | 2 + | C 11 | 2 = 0.46 . The contribution of a chameleon field changes the coefficients C 10 and C 11 , as follows C ¯ 10 = C 10 + C 11 κ and C ¯ 11 = C 11 C 10 κ , where κ = 1.54 × 10 9 β a 10 , 11 ( n ) with 0.28 a 10 , 11 ( n ) 0.10 for n [ 2 , 10 ] . For β 6.5 × 10 8 we obtain 0.35 C ¯ 10 0.51 and 0.58 C ¯ 11 0.48 .
The proposed analysis of the dependence of the upper bound of the chameleon–matter coupling constant β on the depth of a quantum free-fall region of ultra-cold neutrons confirms the stability of the estimate β 6.5 × 10 8 . Of course, such a theoretical constraint should be improved experimentally by fitting the experimental data from the QBB experiments by only one parameter κ .

5. Binding Energy of Ultra-Cold Neutrons to Second-Order Perturbation Theory

For the completeness of our analysis of the contributions of a chameleon field to the wave function of the mixed state of ultra-cold neutrons, bouncing above a mirror in the gravitational field of the Earth, we have to analyse the second-order corrections to the binding energies of ultra-cold neutrons. The binding energy of the quantum gravitational k-state, calculated to second-order perturbation theory, is equal to [42]
E k = m g l 0 ζ k + m g l 0 C ϕ k | ϕ Λ | k + m g l 0 C ϕ 2 k k k | ϕ Λ | k a k , k ( n ) .
The numerical analysis we carry out for the height h = 47 μm and the quantum gravitational states with a principle quantum number k = 6 , 7 , 8 , which give the main contributions to the mixed state Ψ ( z , t ) . At β = 7.7 × 10 7 , the first- and second-order corrections Δ E 1 and Δ E 2 to the binding energies of the quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons under consideration are shown in Figure 4. The smallness of the second-order corrections with respect to the first-order ones testifies to the applicability of perturbation theory for the analysis of contributions of a chameleon field. However, a much stronger dependence of the second-order corrections to the binding energies on the power n makes the search for the experiments meaningful, where the second-order corrections to the binding energies of ultra-cold neutrons may be observed. In this case, one may make stronger constraints on the power n of the potential of a self-interaction of a chameleon field.

6. Conclusions

This study refines the upper bound on the chameleon–matter coupling constant ( β 6.5 × 10 8 ), advancing our understanding of scalar field theories and their role in cosmic acceleration. By leveraging the unique properties of ultra-cold neutrons in qBounce experiments, we demonstrate the capability of laboratory-based setups to probe fundamental physics with unprecedented precision.
The findings highlight the utility of ultra-cold neutron experiments as precise laboratories for testing fundamental theories in physics. By providing a significantly tighter upper bound on the chameleon–matter coupling constant, this research underscores the sensitivity of quantum gravitational systems to subtle scalar field interactions.
These results have profound implications for the role of chameleon fields as drivers of cosmic acceleration. The refined constraints on β challenge the viability of certain parameter ranges within chameleon field theories, narrowing the scope of models compatible with observed cosmic acceleration. By demonstrating the sensitivity of terrestrial experiments to such scalar field interactions, this work strengthens the case for chameleon fields as potential contributors to dark energy while also placing stringent limits on their behaviour.
One critical implication is the potential of qBounce setups to distinguish between competing dark energy models. The refined constraints can aid in differentiating chameleon field effects from alternative mechanisms driving cosmic acceleration. Moreover, the methodology described herein can be adapted to investigate other scalar fields, broadening its applicability in particle physics and cosmology.
Future work should focus on enhancing experimental sensitivities, particularly in detecting higher-order perturbations induced by chameleon fields. Exploring variations in experimental parameters, such as mirror separation or neutron velocity, may yield deeper insights into scalar field dynamics. The integration of complementary observational data from astrophysical phenomena could further validate the theoretical models tested here.
The implications extend beyond chameleon fields, offering insights into scalar field dynamics, quantum mechanics, and gravitational phenomena. These findings lay the groundwork for future experimental and theoretical advancements, highlighting the interplay between cosmology and quantum physics in addressing some of the Universe’s most profound questions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A. and R.H.; methodology, D.A. and R.H.; software, R.H.; validation, R.H.; formal analysis, D.A. and R.H.; Investigation, D.A. and R.H.; data curation, D.A. and R.H.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A. and R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank our dear colleague Andrey Nikolaevich Ivanov, who was the main investigator of this work until he sadly passed away on 18 December 2021. We see it as our professional and personal duty to honor his legacy by continuing to publish our collaborative work. Andrey was born on 3 June 1945 in what was then Leningrad. Since 1993, he was a university professor at the Faculty of Physics, named “Peter The Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University”, after Peter the Great. Since 1995, he was a guest professor at the Institute for Nuclear Physics at the Vienna University of Technology for several years and was closely associated with the institute ever since. This is also were we met Andrey and have been collaborating with him closely for more than 20 years, resulting in 40 scientific publications, see also [17,43,44,45,46,47,48]. We will miss Andrey as a personal friend and his immense wealth of ideas, scientific skills, and his creativity. See also the official obituary (https://www.tuwien.at/en/phy/ati/news/test (accessed on 23 June 2025)) for Andrey Nikolaevich Ivanov.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Wave Functions of Ultra-Cold Neutrons in the Gravitational Field of the Earth Between Two Mirrors and Above a Mirror

The wave function ψ 1 ( z ) of the ground quantum gravitational state of ultra-cold neutrons between two mirrors in the spatial region z 2 d 2 4 is equal to [17]
ψ 1 ( z ) = { Ai ( ξ k ) Bi 1 0 d 2 + z + ξ 1 Ai 1 0 d 2 + z + ξ 1 Bi ( ξ 1 ) } × { d / 2 + d / 2 | Ai ( ξ 1 ) Bi 1 0 d 2 + z + ξ 1 Ai 1 0 d 2 + z + ξ 1 Bi ( ξ 1 ) | 2 d z } 1 / 2 .
The binding energy E 1 = m g 0 ξ 1 = 1.41 peV of the ground quantum gravitational state is given by the equation
Ai ( ξ 1 ) Bi d 0 + ξ 1 Ai d 0 + ξ 1 Bi ( ξ 1 ) = 0
with the root ξ 1 = 2.34497 , calculated at d = 25.5 μm, 0 = ( 2 m 2 g ) 1 / 3 = 5.87 μm, m = 939.5654 MeV , and g = 980.6 cm / s 2 [49].
Above a mirror in the spatial region z D , the wave functions of ultra-cold neutrons are
Ψ k ( z ) = Ai D + z 0 + ζ k D + | Ai D + z 0 + ζ k | 2 d z ,
where ζ k are the roots of the equation Ai ( ζ k ) = 0 [19,20,21]. The binding energies of the first 15 quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons and the coefficients C k for k = 1 , 2 , , 15 are adduced in Table A1.
Table A1. The binding energies of the first 15 quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons in the gravitational field of the Earth above a mirror and the coefficients C k for k = 1 , 2 , , 15 and different heights h = 31 μm, 39 μm, 47 μm, 55 μm, 63 μm. The last two rows show the probabilities P t o t a l = k | C k | for k [ 1 , 2 , , 15 ] and P c o n s i d e r e d for the C k s plotted in bold, which are taken into account for the calculation of transition coefficients a k k ( n ) .
Table A1. The binding energies of the first 15 quantum gravitational states of ultra-cold neutrons in the gravitational field of the Earth above a mirror and the coefficients C k for k = 1 , 2 , , 15 and different heights h = 31 μm, 39 μm, 47 μm, 55 μm, 63 μm. The last two rows show the probabilities P t o t a l = k | C k | for k [ 1 , 2 , , 15 ] and P c o n s i d e r e d for the C k s plotted in bold, which are taken into account for the calculation of transition coefficients a k k ( n ) .
k ζ k E k C k (h = 31 μm) C k (h = 39 μm) C k (h = 47 μm) C k (h = 55 μm) C k (h = 63 μm)
1−2.338111.407 2 × 10 3 1.08 × 10 4 + 4.03 × 10 6 1.05 × 10 7 1.99 × 10 9
2−4.087952.461 3.79 × 10 2 3.66 × 10 3 + 2.23 × 10 4 9.27 × 10 6 2.67 × 10 7
3−5.520563.324 0.23 0.04 + 3.89 × 10 3 2.44 × 10 4 1.03 × 10 5
4−6.786714.086 0.61 0.20 + 3.22 × 10 2 3.08 × 10 3 1.8 × 10 4
5−7.944134.782 0.70 0.52 + 0.15 0.02 1.9 × 10 3
6−9.022655.432 0.17 0.71 + 0.42 0.10 0.01
7−10.040206.044 0.18 0.36 + 0.66 0.30 0.06
8−11.008506.627 0.03 0.13 + 0.55 0.58 0.20
9−11.936007.186 0.02 0.08 + 0.06 0.65 0.44
10−12.828807.723 0.04 0.08 0.17 0.31 0.64
11−13.691508.242 0.05 0.04 + 0.02 0.11 0.53
12−16.132709.712 0.02 0.04 + 0.03 4.69 × 10 3 0.05
13−16.9056010.177 0.03 0.03 + 0.01 0.04 0.07
14−19.1264011.514 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.05
15−19.8381011.943 1.38 × 10 3 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.02
P t o t a l = k | C k | 2 98.67%98.68%98.01%96.80%94.52%
P c o n s i d e r e d = i | C i | 2 97.8%96.72%97.46%95.29%93.62%

References

  1. Riess, A.; Filippenko, A.V.; Challis, P.; Clocchiatti, A.; Diercks, A.; Garnavich, P.M.; Gilliland, R.L.; Hogan, C.J.; Jha, S.; Kirshner, R.P.; et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 1998, 116, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Komatsu, E.; Smith, K.M.; Dunkley, J.; Bennett, C.L.; Gold, B.; Hinshaw, G.; Jarosik, N.; Larson, D.; Nolta, M.R.; Page, L.; et al. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2011, 192, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Larson, D.; Dunkley, J.; Hinshaw, G.; Komatsu, E.; Nolta, M.R.; Bennett, C.L.; Gold, B.; Halpern, M.; Hill, R.S.; Jarosik, N.; et al. Seven-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Power spectra and wmap-derived parameters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2011, 192, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suzuki, N.; Rubin, D.; Lidman, C.; Aldering, G.; Amanullah, R.; Barbary, K.; Barrientos, L.F.; Botyanszki, J.; Brodwin, M.; Connolly, N.; et al. The hubble space telescope cluster supernova survey: V. improving the dark-energy constraints above z > 1 and building an early-type-hosted supernova sample. Astrophys. J. 2012, 746, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sanchez, A.G.; Scoccola, C.G.; Ross, A.J.; Percival, W.; Manera, M.; Montesano, F.; Mazzalay, X.; Cuesta, A.J.; Eisenstein, D.J.; Kazin, E.; et al. The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications of the large-scale two-point correlation function. arXiv 2012, arXiv:1203.6616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Upadhye, A.; Steffen, J.H.; Chou, A.S. Designing dark energy afterglow experiments. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 035006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khoury, J.; Weltman, A. Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 171104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Waterhouse, T.P. An Introduction to Chameleon Gravity. arXiv 2006, arXiv:astro-ph/0611816. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ahmadabadi, H.Y.; Sadjadi, H.M. Imprints of vector field non-standard couplings on solar neutrino flux. Phys. Lett. B 2024, 859, 139110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmadabadi, H.Y.; Sadjadi, H.M. Chameleon-neutrino conformal coupling and MSW-mediated solar neutrino deficit. Phys. Lett. B 2024, 850, 138493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fischer, H.; Käding, C.; Pitschmann, M. Screened Scalar Fields in the Laboratory and the Solar System. Universe 2024, 10, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Silvestri, A.; Trodden, M. Approaches to understanding cosmic acceleration. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2009, 72, 096901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Caldwell, R.R.; Kamionkowski, M. The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2009, 59, 397–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Copel, E.J.; Sami, M.; Tsujikawa, S. Dynamics of dark energy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2006, 15, 1753–1935. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wetterich, C. Cosmology and the fate of dilatation symmetry. Nucl. Phys. B 1988, 302, 668–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brax, P.; Pignol, G. Strongly coupled chameleons and the neutronic quantum bouncer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 111301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ivanov, A.N.; Höllwieser, R.; Jenke, T.; Wellenzohn, M.; Abele, H. The influence of the chameleon field potential on transition frequencies of gravitationally bound quantum states of ultra-cold neutrons. Phys. Rev. 2013, 87, 105013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jenke, T.; Cronenberg, G.; Geltenbort, P.; Ivanov, A.N.; Lauer, T.; Lins, T.; Saul1, H.; Schmidt, U.; Abele, H. A novel quantized frequency reference for dark matter and dark energy searches. arXiv 2012, arXiv:1208.3875. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibbs, R.L. The quantum bouncer. Am. J. Phys. 1975, 43, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gea-Banacloche, J. A quantum bouncing ball. Am. J. Phys. 1999, 67, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wallis, H.; Dalibard, J.; Cohen-Tannoudji, C. Trapping atoms in a gravitational cavity. Appl. Phys. B 1992, 54, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nesvizhevsky, V.V.; Börner, H.G.; Petukhov, A.K.; Abele, H.; Baeßler, S.; Rueß, F.J.; Stöferle, T.; Westphal, A.; Gagarski, A.M.; Petrov, G.A.; et al. Quantum states of neutrons in the Earth’s gravitational field. Nature 2002, 415, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nesvizhevsky, V.V.; Börner, H.G.; Gagarski, A.M.; Petoukhov, A.K.; Petrov, G.A.; Abele, H.; Baeßler, S.; Divkovic, G.; Rueß, F.J.; Stöferle, T.; et al. Measurement of quantum states of neutrons in the Earth’s gravitational field. Phys. Rev. D 2003, 67, 102202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nesvizhevsky, V.V.; Petukhov, A.K.; Börner, H.G.; Baranova, T.A.; Gagarski, A.M.; Petrov, G.A.; Protasov, K.V.; Voronin, A.Y.; Baeßler, S.; Abele, H.; et al. Study of the neutron quantum states in the gravity field. Eur. Phys. J. C 2005, 40, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Westphal, A.; Abele, H.; Baeßler, S.; Nesvizhevsky, V.V.; Protasov, K.V.; Voronin, A.Y. A quantum mechanical description of the experiment on the observation of gravitationally bound states. Eur. Phys. J. C 2007, 51, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abele, H.; Jenke, T.; Leeb, H.; Schmiedmayer, J. Ramsey’s method of separated oscillating fields and its application to gravitationally induced quantum phase shifts. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 81, 065019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Suda, M.; Faber, M.; Bosina, J.; Jenke, T.; Käding, C.; Micko, J.; Pitschmann, M.; Abele, H. Spectra of neutron wave functions in Earth gravitational field. Z. Naturforsch. A 2022, 77, 875–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jenke, T.; Geltenbort, P.; Lemmel, H.; Abele, H. Realization of a gravity-resonance-spectroscopy technique. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Adelberger, E.G.; Heckel, B.R.; Hoedl, S.; Hoyle, C.D.; Kapner, D.J.; Upadhye, A. Particle-Physics Implications of a Recent Test of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 131104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Adelberger, E.; Gundlach, J.; Heckel, B.; Hoedl, S.; Schlamminger, S. Torsion balance experiments: A low-energy frontier of particle physics. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2009, 62, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khoury, J.; Weltman, A. Chameleon cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 2004, 69, 044026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brax, P.; van de Bruck, C.; Davis, A.-C.; Khoury, J.; Weltman, A. Detecting dark energy in orbit: The cosmological chameleon. Phys. Rev. D 2004, 70, 123518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mota, D.F.; Shaw, D.J. Evading equivalence principle violations, cosmological, and other experimental constraints in scalar field theories with a strong coupling to matter. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 063501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mota, D.F.; Shaw, D.J. Strongly coupled chameleon fields: New horizons in scalar field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 97, 151102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Brax, P.; van de Bruck, C.; Davis, A.-C.; Mota, D.F.; Shaw, D. Detecting chameleons through Casimir force measurements. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 76, 124034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Upadhye, A.; Gubser, S.S.; Khoury, J. Unveiling chameleon fields in tests of the gravitational inverse-square law. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 104024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cronenberg, G.; Filter, H.; Thalhammer, M.; Jenke, T.; Abele, H.; Geltenbort, P. A Gravity of Earth Measurement with a qBOUNCE Experiment. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1512.09134. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hamilton, P.; Jaffe, M.; Haslinger, P.; Simmons, Q.; Müller, H.; Khoury, J. Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 94, 044051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abele, H.; Jenke, T.; Stadler, D.; Geltenbort, P. QuBounce: The dynamics of ultra-cold neutrons falling in the gravity potential of the Earth. Nucl. Phys. A 2009, 827, 593c–595c. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jenke, T.; Stadler, D.; Abele, H.; Geltenbort, P. Q-BOUNCE—Experiments with quantum bouncing ultracold neutrons. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 2009, 611, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abele, H.; Leeb, H. Gravitation and quantum interference experiments with neutrons. New J. Phys. 2012, 14, 055010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Davydov, A.S. Quantum Mechanics; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ivanov, A.N.; Höllwieser, R.; Troitskaya, N.I.; Wellenzohn, M.; Berdnikov, Y.A. Neutron Dark Matter Decays. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1806.10107. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ivanov, A.N.; Höllwieser, R.; Troitskaya, N.I.; Wellenzohn, M.; Berdnikov, Y.A. Neutron dark matter decays and correlation coefficients of neutron β--decays. Nucl. Phys. B 2019, 938, 114–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ivanov, A.N.; Höllwieser, R.; Troitskaya, N.I.; Wellenzohn, M.; Berdnikov, Y.A. Tests of the standard model in neutron β decay with a polarized neutron and electron and an unpolarized proton. Phys. Rev. C 2018, 98, 035503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ivanov, A.N.; Höllwieser, R.; Troitskaya, N.I.; Wellenzohn, M.; Berdnikov, Y.A. Precision analysis of electron energy spectrum and angular distribution of neutron β decay with polarized neutron and electron. Phys. Rev. C 2017, 95, 055502, Erratum in Phys. Rev. C 2021, 104, 069901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ivanov, A.N.; Höllwieser, R.; Troitskaya, N.I.; Wellenzohn, M.; Zherebtsov, O.M.; Serebrov, A.P. Deficit of reactor antineutrinos at distances smaller than 100 m and inverse β decay. Phys. Rev. C 2013, 88, 055501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ivanov, A.N.; Cronenberg, G.; Höllwieser, R.; Pitschmann, M.; Jenke, T.; Wellenzohn, M.; Abele, H. Exact solution for chameleon field, self-coupled through the Ratra-Peebles potential with n=1 and confined between two parallel plates. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 94, 085005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Beringer, J.; Arguin, J.-F.; Barnett, R.M.; Copic, K.; Dahl, O.; Groom, D.E.; Lin, C.-J.; Lys, J.; Murayama, H.; Wohl, C.G.; et al. Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 010001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sketch of the setup. Neutrons are prepared in the lower quantum states in the scatter-mirror system and then fall down a step above a mirror (figure reproduced with permission from [39,40,41]).
Figure 1. Sketch of the setup. Neutrons are prepared in the lower quantum states in the scatter-mirror system and then fall down a step above a mirror (figure reproduced with permission from [39,40,41]).
Jne 06 00020 g001
Figure 2. Coefficients C k ( D ) for k = 1 20 as a function ofthe distance D.
Figure 2. Coefficients C k ( D ) for k = 1 20 as a function ofthe distance D.
Jne 06 00020 g002
Figure 3. The behaviour of a 67 (blue), a 68 (orange), and a 87 (green) as functions of n for n [ 2 , 10 ] .
Figure 3. The behaviour of a 67 (blue), a 68 (orange), and a 87 (green) as functions of n for n [ 2 , 10 ] .
Jne 06 00020 g003
Figure 4. The first- and second-order corrections to the binding energies of the quantum gravitational states with the principle quantum number k = 6 (blue), k = 7 (red), and k = 8 (brown) are calculated as functions of n for the height h = 47 μm.
Figure 4. The first- and second-order corrections to the binding energies of the quantum gravitational states with the principle quantum number k = 6 (blue), k = 7 (red), and k = 8 (brown) are calculated as functions of n for the height h = 47 μm.
Jne 06 00020 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altarawneh, D.; Höllwieser, R. Ultra-Cold Neutrons in qBounce Experiments as Laboratory for Test of Chameleon Field Theories and Cosmic Acceleration. J. Nucl. Eng. 2025, 6, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne6030020

AMA Style

Altarawneh D, Höllwieser R. Ultra-Cold Neutrons in qBounce Experiments as Laboratory for Test of Chameleon Field Theories and Cosmic Acceleration. Journal of Nuclear Engineering. 2025; 6(3):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne6030020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altarawneh, Derar, and Roman Höllwieser. 2025. "Ultra-Cold Neutrons in qBounce Experiments as Laboratory for Test of Chameleon Field Theories and Cosmic Acceleration" Journal of Nuclear Engineering 6, no. 3: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne6030020

APA Style

Altarawneh, D., & Höllwieser, R. (2025). Ultra-Cold Neutrons in qBounce Experiments as Laboratory for Test of Chameleon Field Theories and Cosmic Acceleration. Journal of Nuclear Engineering, 6(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne6030020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop