Previous Article in Journal
Pelvic Neuroanatomy in Colorectal Surgery: Advances in Nerve Preservation for Optimized Functional Outcomes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Burden of Weight on Joint Replacement: A 1.6 Million-Patient Analysis of BMI and Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes

1
Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel
2
Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 2611001, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Surgeries 2025, 6(4), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6040095
Submission received: 11 September 2025 / Revised: 15 October 2025 / Accepted: 25 October 2025 / Published: 29 October 2025

Abstract

Background: THA is a gold-standard intervention for end-stage hip osteoarthritis, historically performed in older adults. However, the growing global obesity epidemic is reshaping this landscape. Emerging evidence suggests that elevated body mass index (BMI) may not only worsen perioperative outcomes but also accelerate the need for surgery at a younger age. Understanding how BMI influences both the timing and safety of THA is crucial to optimizing care in this evolving patient population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,626,965 elective THA hospitalizations from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were stratified by BMI into three categories: <29.9, 30–34.9, and ≥35. Fracture- and oncology-related cases were excluded. ICD-10 codes identified comorbidities and complications. Primary outcomes included age at surgery, in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), complications, and hospitalization costs. Statistical analysis used Pearson correlation, linear regression, chi-square tests, and t-tests via SPSS version 26.0.0.0. Results: Higher BMI was significantly associated with younger age at THA (r = −0.187, p < 0.001). Each 5-unit BMI increase corresponded to a ~2-year decrease in age at surgery. Obese patients had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and sleep apnea. Complications including blood loss anemia, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, and postoperative infections were more common in higher BMI groups. LOS increased with BMI, though total hospital charges showed minimal clinical variation. Conclusions: Obesity is a key driver of earlier THA and elevated perioperative risk. These findings underscore the need for BMI-tailored surgical planning and risk stratification. As younger, high-BMI patients increasingly undergo THA, future strategies must focus on preoperative optimization, complication prevention, and long-term implant durability.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis is a chronic, degenerative joint disorder and a leading contributor to pain and mobility limitations in over 27 million Americans [1]. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains the definitive surgical treatment for advanced hip osteoarthritis—delivering sustained improvements in pain, mobility, and quality of life [2,3,4]. However, the obesity epidemic has significantly reshaped the patient profile for THA. Obesity not only accelerates the development of osteoarthritis [5,6,7] but also compounds surgical complexity, elevating both perioperative risks and long-term revision rates [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
BMI, a standardized weight-for-height metric [17], has emerged as a critical variable influencing not just outcomes but also the timing of surgical intervention. Historically reserved for older patients [18], THA is now increasingly performed at younger ages—likely driven by obesity-related joint degeneration [15,19]. This shift introduces unique challenges: younger, high-BMI patients face increased implant stress, longer postoperative life expectancy, and higher functional demands—factors linked to early prosthesis failure and the need for complex revisions [18,20].
In this study, we leveraged the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to evaluate the relationship between BMI and age at THA, along with associated perioperative outcomes, complications, length of hospital stay, and healthcare costs. By analyzing this large-scale, nationally representative dataset, we aim to provide actionable insights for improving patient-specific care strategies and informing health policy as the THA demographic continues to shift toward younger and more obese populations.

Research Questions

This study explores the primary determinants of THA across various BMI categories, with an emphasis on the influence of demographic and clinical characteristics on surgical outcomes. The research examines the prevalence and impact of comorbidities on postoperative complications while analyzing differences in hospital length of stay, healthcare costs, and mortality rates among BMI groups. Furthermore, it identifies common postoperative complications and investigates the age-specific effects of BMI on THA outcomes.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Source

The data were drawn from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), a part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). The NIS provides a representative 20% stratified sample of all inpatient discharges from US hospitals, amounting to approximately seven million unweighted hospital stays annually. This study analyzed data from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019.

2.2. Study Population and Variables

This study utilized a dataset comprising 1,626,965 cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Cases involving fractures and oncology were removed to ensure a focused analysis of elective THA. Fracture-related THA cases were excluded to isolate elective, degenerative indications, as inclusion of trauma cases would have introduced heterogeneity in urgency, comorbidity profile, and surgical complexity. Obesity and BMI classifications were identified using specific ICD-10 codes. The study population was categorized into the following BMI groups: BMI < 29.9, 29.9 < BMI < 34.9 (Class I obesity), 34.9 < BMI < 39.9 (Class II obesity), and BMI ≥ 39.9 (Class III obesity).

2.3. Correlation Between BMI and Age of THA

The relationship between BMI and the age of THA was analyzed using Pearson correlation and linear regression. This analysis aimed to determine whether there was a significant correlation between BMI and the age at which patients underwent THA. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and the significance level (p-value) were calculated to assess the strength and significance of the relationship. Linear regression analysis was performed to quantify the effect of BMI on the age of THA and to develop a regression equation.

2.4. Patient Identification and Comorbidities

Comorbidities were identified through a comprehensive review of patient-specific ICD-10 codes. Osteoporosis prevalence was based solely on ICD-10 diagnostic coding, as bone mineral density information is not available in NIS. Cases reporting hospital costs of $0 were excluded from the analysis. The following comorbidities were identified: hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic anemia, osteoporosis, alcohol abuse, type 2 diabetes, renal disease, chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic lung disease, and use of anticoagulants.

2.5. Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measures in this study included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), complications, and total hospitalization costs. The NIS database reports total hospital charges but does not differentiate between implant, surgical, or facility costs; therefore, cost breakdown by category was not possible. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using established methodologies.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26.0.0.0. Frequencies and proportions of different demographic, clinical, and hospital-related variables were calculated and weighted to reflect national estimates using discharge sample weights provided by the NIS. Comparisons were made using Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables and independent sample t-tests for continuous variables. A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied. Analytical studies were conducted using SPSS version 26.0.0.0 and Microsoft Excel to visualize annual cases, discern trends, and derive key statistical insights. The regression model evaluating BMI versus age at THA was unadjusted and intended to demonstrate the direct association between these continuous variables. Multivariable adjustment for comorbidities or socioeconomic factors was beyond the scope of this descriptive analysis. Given the large sample size, many comparisons achieved statistical significance with minimal absolute differences; therefore, effect size interpretation and clinical relevance were emphasized in the Section 4. Due to the difference in average age in BMI groups and the connection between BMI and age of THA, shown earlier in the article, we added an extra analysis to subgroups based on age to better understand these trends. Traditional statistical tests were applied to maintain consistency with prior national arthroplasty studies and to ensure clear, reproducible clinical interpretation. Advanced predictive modeling techniques were beyond the scope of this descriptive population analysis.

2.7. Ethical Aspects

The study was conducted under exempt status granted by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived due to the de-identified nature of the NIS dataset.

3. Results

3.1. BMI Classification and Distribution

The study population was categorized into four BMI groups: BMI < 29.9, 29.9 < BMI < 34.9 (Class I obesity), 34.9 < BMI < 39.9 (Class II obesity), and 39.9 < BMI (Class III obesity). Comprehensive tabular data and a regression scatter plot (Figure 1) were used to illustrate the main findings for optimal clarity and conciseness. The total number of patients in each BMI group is as follows: BMI < 29.9: 1,244,050; 29.9 < BMI < 34.9 (Class I obesity): 182,780; 34.9 < BMI < 39.9 (Class II obesity): 200,010; and 39.9 < BMI (Class III obesity): 125. Because the Class III obesity subgroup included fewer than 0.01% of total THA cases (n = 125), it was merged with Class II obesity to ensure sufficient statistical power and stable regression estimates. The two groups were rechecked and found to demonstrate parallel trends.

3.2. Correlation Between BMI and Age of THA

The relationship between BMI and the age at which patients undergo THA was assessed using Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis. A significant negative correlation was identified between BMI and age at THA (r = −0.187, p < 0.001). Additionally, linear regression analysis demonstrated that BMI is a significant predictor of the age at THA (β = −0.405, p < 0.001). The regression equation is as follows:
Age of THA = 77.989 − 0.405 × BMI
From this regression model, we can infer that for every 5-point increase in BMI, the age at which patients undergo THA decreases by approximately 2 years.
The scatter plot (Figure 1) visually illustrates the inverse relationship between BMI and the age of THA.

3.3. Baseline Characteristics of Patients by BMI Classification

The baseline characteristics of patients, categorized by BMI groups, are detailed in Table 1. The majority of surgeries were performed on patients with a BMI of less than 29.9, comprising 76.5% of the total surgeries. The average age at the time of surgery decreased as BMI increased, from 66.14 years for patients with a BMI of less than 29.9 to 62.04 years for those with Class II and Class III obesity (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a higher proportion of females was observed in the Class II and Class III obesity groups, accounting for 57.2%.
A majority of patients with a BMI less than 29.9 and Class I obesity were Medicare beneficiaries, whereas a higher percentage of patients in the Class II and Class III obesity groups were covered by private insurance (44.8%) (p < 0.0001).

3.4. Etiologies of Total Hip Arthroplasty by BMI Classification

The etiologies leading to THA are summarized in Table 2. Primary osteoarthritis is the predominant reason for THA across all BMI categories, with its prevalence slightly increasing with higher BMI (91.42% for BMI < 29.9, 93.09% for BMI 29.9–34.9, and 93.63% for BMI ≥ 34.9, p < 0.0001).
Revision surgeries and osteonecrosis show a decrease in prevalence with increasing BMI. Rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease, and leg deformities are relatively rare etiologies with slight variations across BMI categories.

3.5. Comorbidities by BMI Classification

The prevalence of various comorbidities across different BMI categories is summarized in Table 3. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and sleep apnea diagnoses increase with higher BMI. Other notable trends include an increase in type 2 diabetes and the use of anticoagulants with higher BMI, while the prevalence of osteoporosis decreases as BMI increases. Mental disorders and chronic lung disease also show higher prevalence in patients with higher BMI.

3.6. Complications and Outcomes by BMI Classification

The prevalence of various complications and outcomes across different BMI categories is summarized in Table 4. Blood loss anemia, acute kidney injury, and venous thromboembolism increase with higher BMI. Blood transfusion rates slightly decrease with higher BMI. The incidence of intraoperative fractures and infections is also slightly higher in the highest BMI category.

3.7. Mortality, Length of Stay, and Charges by BMI Classification

Key outcomes related to hospitalization are presented in Table 5. The mortality rate during hospitalization is similar across all BMI groups. However, the length of stay increases with higher BMI, averaging 2.00 days for BMI < 29.9, 2.01 days for BMI 29.9–34.9, and 2.21 days for BMI ≥ 34.9 (p < 0.0001). Total charges significantly differ statistically, with mean charges of $63,490 for BMI < 29.9, $63,920 for BMI 29.9–34.9, and $63,819 for BMI ≥ 34.9 (p < 0.0001). However, hospital charges represent billed amounts rather than actual costs, which vary between institutions; thus, these statistical differences likely reflect administrative rather than true economic variation.

3.8. Age-Specific Complications and Outcomes by BMI Classification

Table 6 presents a comprehensive analysis of age-specific complications and outcomes across BMI classifications. Due to the difference in average age in BMI groups and the connection between BMI and age of THA, shown earlier in the article, an additional analysis was conducted on age-based subgroups to further elucidate these trends. The analysis reveals that complications such as blood loss anemia, acute kidney injury, and intraoperative fractures are significantly higher in older patients with higher BMI. Furthermore, the length of stay and total charges increase with both age and BMI, highlighting the compounded risk factors that age and obesity contribute to surgical outcomes.

4. Discussion

4.1. Main Findings

Our main finding indicates that obese patients were significantly younger, supporting the association between obesity and early-onset osteoarthritis. Additionally, a disproportionately high rate of female patients (57.2%) with BMI ≥ 34.9 was noted, consistent with prior observations of osteoarthritis prevalence in obese women. Furthermore, obesity was associated with an increased prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes, and chronic lung disease. The incidence of complications, including blood loss anemia, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, intraoperative fractures, and postoperative infections, was also significantly higher in obese patients. Interestingly, osteoporosis prevalence and the need for blood transfusions decreased with increasing BMI. This inverse association may be related to lower relative blood loss in obese patients or to institution-specific restrictive transfusion thresholds not captured within NIS data; however, this remains speculative and warrants future confirmation. While hospitalization length increased, total hospital charges remained relatively unaffected.

4.2. Time to THA

Despite the well-established pathophysiological effects of obesity on osteoarthritis, its influence on the age at which THA is performed requires further investigation.
Singh et al. [21] analyzed data from the Mayo Clinic, including 6168 patients, and showed that between 1993 and 2005, the mean age at THA decreased by 0.7 years (p < 0.002) while BMI increased by 1.6 kg/m2 (p < 0.001).
Similarly, Haynes et al. [15] performed a systematic review of 17 studies encompassing 13,722 THA patients and found a consistent trend of younger surgical age among obese individuals.
Johnson et al. [22,23] analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database and identified 688,371 THA and 1,556,651 TKA cases over sixteen years, demonstrating a significant decrease in mean age for THA (from 66.7 to 65.9 years, p < 0.001) alongside a rise in the proportion of obese patients undergoing these procedures (from 7.0% to 22.7%, p < 0.001).
The present study corroborates these findings, revealing that patients with higher BMI were significantly younger at the time of surgery. The mean age at surgery decreased from 66.14 years in patients with BMI < 29.9 to 62.04 years in those with Class II and Class III obesity (p < 0.0001). This suggests that obesity accelerates the need for surgical intervention due to its exacerbating effects on hip osteoarthritis, leading to more rapid joint degeneration.
This trend is concerning, as younger age at initial THA increases the likelihood of revision surgery, which is technically challenging, more expensive, and associated with inferior outcomes compared to primary THA [24,25,26].

4.3. Complications

Obesity is widely believed to increase perioperative and postoperative complications, though literature findings remain mixed.
Moran et al. [27] reviewed 800 THA cases followed for at least 18 months and found no correlation between BMI and complications, attributing this to regression analysis that adjusted for confounders but noting limited power for rare events.
Contrary to those findings, our study demonstrated that obese patients had significantly higher complication rates than their non-obese counterparts. Specifically, blood loss anemia, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, intraoperative fractures, and postoperative infections were all significantly associated with higher BMI, aligning with prior reports [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Interestingly, the need for blood transfusions decreased with increasing BMI, suggesting a complex interplay between obesity and surgical bleeding risk. This contrasts with Friedman et al. [28], who reported no association between morbid obesity and increased bleeding or VTE risk, underscoring variability in perioperative practices.
Given the low absolute rates of major complications, large-scale studies such as ours are essential for detecting significant differences [29]. The elevated complication rate in obese patients may be attributed to the technical challenges of THA in this population. The increased mass of adipose and muscle tissue necessitates prolonged surgical exposure and prosthesis insertion time. Additionally, higher BMI contributes to increased mechanical loading on hip prostheses, which could accelerate implant loosening. However, this effect may be counterbalanced by the relatively lower activity levels of morbidly obese patients, which could reduce prosthetic wear [30,31,32].
Moreover, obesity-related metabolic changes, including denutrition and chronic low-grade inflammation, may predispose patients to complications [22,33,34,35]. Further research is required to elucidate these metabolic alterations and their clinical implications in THA.

4.4. Hospitalization Factors

The impact of obesity on LOS and overall costs remains debated. Given the increasing prevalence of obesity and joint arthroplasties, understanding their economic implications is essential. Some studies found no association between obesity and LOS [36,37,38], while others reported increased resource utilization in obese patients [39,40].
Wayne A. Wilkie et al. analyzed 453,250 National Inpatient Sample cases of THA performed between 2009 and 2016 in patients with BMI > 25 kg/m2. They found that morbidly obese patients (BMI > 40.1 kg/m2) had significantly longer LOS compared to non-morbidly obese (BMI 30.0–40.0 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2) patients (p < 0.001) [41]. These findings are consistent with the present study, suggesting that obesity increases the complexity of perioperative care and recovery, necessitating extended hospitalization and additional monitoring.
Despite the prolonged LOS, this study found that total hospital charges did not significantly vary across BMI categories. The NIS provides total hospitalization charges but not itemized billing data such as implant, surgical, or facility costs. Implant expenses are known to represent a major portion of arthroplasty expenditures in the U.S. and are under ongoing national cost-reduction initiatives. This contradicts the findings of Senthil Sambandam et al., who, in a retrospective National Inpatient Sample (NIS) analysis of 1646 THA cases, reported significantly higher costs in the super-obese group (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2; $79,784.64) compared to the non-super-obese group ($66,821.75) [40]. The discrepancy may be due to differing BMI classification methods.
Given the broader dataset analyzed in this study, its findings suggest that while obesity leads to increased healthcare resource utilization, the additional financial burden per patient may be less significant than previously thought.

4.5. Limitations and Strengths

This study benefits from a large, nationally representative dataset, providing robust insights into the relationship between BMI and THA outcomes. However, several limitations should be noted. Because NIS captures only the index hospitalization, long-term outcomes such as revisions, readmissions, or functional scores could not be evaluated. Osteoporosis and other comorbidities were identified using diagnostic codes, which may introduce misclassification. Although female predominance was observed in higher BMI groups, sex-specific subgroup analyses were not performed. Finally, results should be interpreted with consideration of the dataset’s administrative nature and limited clinical granularity. Because NIS lacks longitudinal identifiers, revision surgeries performed after discharge could not be analyzed, limiting assessment of long-term associations between BMI and implant survival.

5. Conclusions

Understanding the impact of BMI on the timing, complications, and outcomes of total hip arthroplasty is crucial for optimizing patient care.
  • Higher BMI is significantly associated with younger age at THA.
  • Obesity increases perioperative complications, including anemia, acute kidney injury, and venous thromboembolism.
  • Hospital stay length rises with BMI, while total hospital charges remain relatively stable.
  • These findings emphasize the importance of BMI-tailored perioperative optimization and long-term risk assessment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.B., S.F. and D.M.; Methodology, D.M. and Y.S.; Data curation, S.F., E.C.N. and L.F.; Formal analysis, D.M. and L.F.; Writing—original draft, D.M. and S.F.; Writing—review and editing, Y.B., E.C.N., L.F. and Y.S.; Visualization, L.F. and Y.S.; Supervision, Y.B. and D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study as confirmed in writing by the Helsinki Committee of Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, because it was based on the de-identified HCUP NIS database.

Informed Consent Statement

The study was conducted under exempt status granted by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived due to the de-identified nature of the NIS dataset.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors confirm that large language models (LLMs) were used only for language refinement and formatting assistance. All analyses, data interpretation, and scientific content were performed and verified by the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

List of Abbreviations (A–Z):
BMIBody Mass Index
HCUPHealthcare Cost and Utilization Project
ICD-10International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision
LOSLength of Stay
NISNationwide Inpatient Sample
SPSSStatistical Package for the Social Sciences
THATotal Hip Arthroplasty

References

  1. Lawrence, R.C.; Felson, D.T.; Helmick, C.G.; Arnold, L.M.; Choi, H.; Deyo, R.A.; Gabriel, S.; Hirsch, R.; Hochberg, M.C.; Hunder, G.G.; et al. Estimates of the Prevalence of Arthritis and Other Rheumatic Conditions in the United States, Part II for the National Arthritis Data Workgroup. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Harris, W.H.; Sledge, C.B. Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 323, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ethgen, O.; Bruyère, O.; Richy, F.; Dardennes, C.; Reginster, J.Y. Health-Related Quality of Life in Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2004, 86, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pivec, R.; Johnson, A.J.; Mears, S.C.; Mont, M.A. Hip arthroplasty. Lancet 2012, 380, 1768–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bastick, A.N.; Runhaar, J.; Belo, J.N.; Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.A. Prognostic factors for progression of clinical osteoarthritis of the knee: A systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Holliday, K.L.; McWilliams, D.F.; Maciewicz, R.A.; Muir, K.R.; Zhang, W.; Doherty, M. Lifetime body mass index, other anthropometric measures of obesity and risk of knee or hip osteoarthritis in the GOAL case-control study. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2011, 19, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sasaki, E.; Ota, S.; Chiba, D.; Kimura, Y.; Sasaki, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tsuda, E.; Nakaji, S.; Ishibashi, Y. Early knee osteoarthritis prevalence is highest among middle-aged adult females with obesity based on new set of diagnostic criteria from a large sample cohort study in the Japanese general population. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2020, 28, 984–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuroda, Y.; Hashimoto, S.; Saito, M.; Hayashi, S.; Nakano, N.; Matsushita, T.; Niikura, T.; Kuroda, R.; Matsumoto, T. Obesity is associated with less favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2021, 29, 1483–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Andrew, J.G.; Palan, J.; Kurup, H.V.; Gibson, P.; Murray, D.W.; Beard, D.J. Obesity in total hip replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2008, 90-B, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patel, V.P.; Walsh, M.; Sehgal, B.; Preston, C.; DeWal, H.; Di Cesare, P.E. Factors Associated with Prolonged Wound Drainage After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2007, 89, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Namba, R.S.; Paxton, L.; Fithian, D.C.; Stone, M.L. Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. J. Arthroplast. 2005, 20, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Azodi, O.S.; Bellocco, R.; Eriksson, K.; Adami, J. The impact of tobacco use and body mass index on the length of stay in hospital and the risk of post-operative complications among patients undergoing total hip replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2006, 88-B, 1316–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lübbeke, A.; Stern, R.; Garavaglia, G.; Zurcher, L.; Hoffmeyer, P. Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res. 2007, 57, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Haverkamp, D.; Klinkenbijl, M.N.; Somford, M.P.; Albers, G.H.R.; Van Der Vis, H.M. Obesity in total hip arthroplasty does it really matter? Acta Orthop. 2011, 82, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rubin, J.; Potluri, A.S.; Jan, K.; Dandamudi, S.; Levine, B.R. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. Glob. Res. Rev. 2025, 9, e24.00306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  16. Liu, W.; Wahafu, T.; Cheng, M.; Cheng, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. The influence of obesity on primary total hip arthroplasty outcomes: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2015, 101, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, Y.; Li, D.; Vermund, S.H. Advantages and Limitations of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to Assess Adult Obesity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bayliss, L.E.; Culliford, D.; Monk, A.P.; Glyn-Jones, S.; Prieto-Alhambra, D.; Judge, A.; Cooper, C.; Carr, A.J.; Arden, N.K.; Beard, D.J.; et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: A population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017, 389, 1424–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hales, C.M.; Carroll, M.D.; Fryar, C.D.; Ogden, C.L. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015–2016 Key Findings Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 2015. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288_table.pdf#1 (accessed on 15 October 2025).
  20. Keener, J.D.; Callaghan, J.J.; Goetz, D.D.; Pederson, D.R.; Sullivan, P.M.; Johnston, R.C. Twenty-five-year results after Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. J. Bone Jt. Surg.-Am. Vol. 2003, 85, 1066–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prieto-Alhambra, D.; Judge, A.; Javaid, M.K.; Cooper, C.; Diez-Perez, A.; Arden, N.K. Incidence and risk factors for clinically diagnosed knee, hip and hand osteoarthritis: Influences of age, gender and osteoarthritis affecting other joints. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 73, 1659–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pottie, P.; Presle, N.; Terlain, B.; Netter, P.; Mainard, D.; Berenbaum, F. Obesity and osteoarthritis: More complex than predicted! Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006, 65, 1403–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Johnson, C.A.; White, C.C.; Kunkle, B.F.; Eichinger, J.K.; Friedman, R.J. Effects of the Obesity Epidemic on Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Demographics. J. Arthroplast. 2021, 36, 3097–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duwelius, P.J.; Southgate, R.D.; Crutcher, J.P.; Rollier, G.M.; Li, H.-F.; Sypher, K.S.; Tompkins, G.S. Registry Data Show Complication Rates and Cost in Revision Hip Arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2023, 38, S29–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lie, S.A.; Havelin, L.I.; Furnes, O.N.; Engesæter, L.B.; Vollset, S.E. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2004, 86-B, 504–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ong, K.L.; Lau, E.; Suggs, J.; Kurtz, S.M.; Manley, M.T. Risk of Subsequent Revision after Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468, 3070–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moran, M.; Walmsley, P.; Gray, A.; Brenkel, I.J. Does body mass index affect the early outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty? J. Arthroplast. 2005, 20, 866–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Friedman, R.J.; Hess, S.; Berkowitz, S.D.; Homering, M. Complication rates after hip or knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013, 471, 3358–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wallace, G.; Judge, A.; Prieto-Alhambra, D.; de Vries, F.; Arden, N.K.; Cooper, C. The effect of body mass index on the risk of post-operative complications during the 6 months following total hip replacement or total knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2014, 22, 918–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Telang, S.; Palmer, R.; Chung, B.C.; Ball, J.R.; Hong, K.; Lieberman, J.R.; Heckmann, N.D. Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Superobese Patients: Proceed with Caution. Arthroplast. Today 2025, 34, 101770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chee, Y.H.; Teoh, K.H.; Sabnis, B.M.; Ballantyne, J.A.; Brenkel, I.J. Total hip replacement in morbidly obese patients with osteoarthritis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2010, 92-B, 1066–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. McLaughlin, J.R.; Lee, K.R. The outcome of total hip replacement in obese and non-obese patients at 10- to 18-years. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2006, 88-B, 1286–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zeyda, M.; Stulnig, T.M. Obesity, Inflammation, and Insulin Resistance—A Mini-Review. Gerontology 2009, 55, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Di Costanzo, J. Influence de l’état nutritionnel préopératoire sur la morbidité postopératoire. Ann. Françaises Anesth. Reanim. 1995, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Parratte, S.; Pesenti, S.; Argenson, J.N. Obesity in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2014, 100, S91–S97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Søballe, K.; Christensen, F.; Luxhøj, T. Hip replacement in obese patients. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1987, 58, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matar, H.E.; Pincus, D.; Paterson, J.M.; Aktar, S.; Jenkinson, R.; Ravi, B. Early Surgical Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Morbid Obesity: Propensity-Matched Cohort Study of 3683 Patients. J. Arthroplast. 2020, 35, 2646–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schroer, W.C.; Diesfeld, P.J.; LeMarr, A.R.; Morton, D.J.; Reedy, M.E. Modifiable Risk Factors in Primary Joint Arthroplasty Increase 90-Day Cost of Care. J. Arthroplast. 2018, 33, 2740–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shaka, H.; Ojemolon, P.E. Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis Who Underwent Hip Arthroplasty. Cureus 2020, 12, e10876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sambandam, S.; Serbin, P.; Senthil, T.; Varatharaj, S.; Sakthivelnathan, V.; Ramanan, S.P.; Mounasamy, V. Patient Characteristics, Length of Stay, Cost of Care, and Complications in Super-Obese Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A National Database Study. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 2023, 15, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wilkie, W.A.; Remily, E.A.; Mohamed, N.S.; McDermott, S.; Shalit, B.; Baird, A.; Brand, K.; Nace, J.; Delanois, R. Obesity in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Demographic Disparities and Outcome Incongruities. Cureus 2020, 12, e7955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scatter Plot of BMI vs. Age of THA.
Figure 1. Scatter Plot of BMI vs. Age of THA.
Surgeries 06 00095 g001
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients by BMI Classification.
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients by BMI Classification.
ParameterBMI < 29.929.9 < BMI < 34.9
Class I Obesity
34.9 < BMI
Class II Obesity + Class III Obesity
Significance
Total Surgeries (%)76.50%11.20%12.30%-
Average Age (y)66.1464.8662.04p < 0.0001
Female (%)55.5%51.8%57.2%p < 0.0001
Payer—Medicare (%)56.5%52.2%45.4%p < 0.0001
Payer—Medicaid (%)4.8%5.0%6.5%
Payer—Private (%)35.6%39.8%44.8%
Payer—Other (including self-pay) (%)3.1%3.0%3.3%
Median Household Income 0–25% (%)19.0%18.6%21.6%p < 0.0001
Median Household Income 26th–50th% (%)24.9%23.9%27.4%
Median Household Income 51st–75th% (%)27.2%27.8%27.9%
Median Household Income 76th–100th% (%)28.9%29.7%23.1%
Table 2. Etiologies of Total Hip Arthroplasty by BMI Classification.
Table 2. Etiologies of Total Hip Arthroplasty by BMI Classification.
EtiologiesBMI < 29.929.9 < BMI < 34.934.9 < BMI Significance
Primary osteoarthritis91.42%93.09%93.63%p < 0.0001
Revision4.10%3.51%3.65%
Osteonecrosis4.11%3.08%2.41%
Rheumatoid arthritis0.16%0.13%0.10%
Post-traumatic arthritis0.11%0.09%0.09%
Legg-Calvé-Perthes0.05%0.04%0.05%
Leg Deformity0.04%0.05%0.07%
Table 3. Comorbidities by BMI Classification.
Table 3. Comorbidities by BMI Classification.
BMI < 29.929.9 < BMI < 34.934.9 < BMISignificance
Hypertension Diagnosis49.5%57.7%63.4%p < 0.0001
Dyslipidemia Diagnosis40.3%51.1%47.3%p < 0.0001
Sleep Apnea Diagnosis6.7%15.3%26.1%p < 0.0001
Chronic Anemia5.7%5.8%5.9%p < 0.0001
Alcohol Abuse1.5%1.6%1.1%p < 0.0001
Osteoporosis5.00%3.80%2.30%p < 0.0001
Mental Disorders29.2%33.0%34.5%p < 0.0001
Type 2 Diabetes12.3%20.4%26.7%p < 0.0001
Renal Disease5.8%8.4%8.4%p < 0.0001
CHF1.1%1.4%1.7%p < 0.0001
Chronic Lung Disease6.5%6.9%7.5%p < 0.0001
Use of anticoagulants5.2%6.4%7.2%p < 0.0001
Abbreviations: CHF—Congestive Heart Failure.
Table 4. Postoperative Complications by BMI Classification.
Table 4. Postoperative Complications by BMI Classification.
BMI < 29.929.9 < BMI < 34.934.9 < BMISignificance
Blood Loss Anemia17.49%19.09%19.15%p < 0.0001
Blood Transfusion3.00%2.46%2.53%p < 0.0001
Acute Kidney Injury1.50%2.00%3.10%p < 0.0001
Intraoperative Fracture0.77%0.72%0.89%p < 0.0001
Venous Thromboembolism0.16%0.20%0.24%p < 0.0001
Hip Dislocation0.15%0.15%0.13%p = 0.044
Acute Coronary Artery Disease0.09%0.08%0.06%p = 0.001
Pneumonia0.13%0.14%0.15%p = 0.031
Pulmonary Embolism0.07%0.09%0.11%p < 0.0001
Heart Failure0.08%0.14%0.13%p < 0.0001
Pulmonary Edema0.04%0.04%0.07%p < 0.0001
Infection0.03%0.03%0.04%p = 0.013
Table 5. Mortality, Length of Stay, and Charges by BMI Classification.
Table 5. Mortality, Length of Stay, and Charges by BMI Classification.
BMI < 29.929.9 < BMI < 34.934.9 < BMISignificance
Died during hospitalization0.04%0.03%0.03%0.087
Length of stay mean in days2.002.012.21p < 0.0001
Total charges mean in $63,49063,92063,819p < 0.0001
Table 6. Age-specific Complications and Outcomes by BMI Classification.
Table 6. Age-specific Complications and Outcomes by BMI Classification.
BMI < 29.929.9 < BMI < 34.934.9 < BMISignificance
Blood Loss Anemia (age under 60)15.2%17.0%17.5%p < 0.0001
Blood Loss Anemia (age 60–70)16.1%18.1%19.1%p < 0.0001
Blood Loss Anemia (age over 70)20.6%22.6%22.8%p < 0.0001
Blood Transfusion (age under 60)2.4%2.1%2.3%p < 0.0001
Blood Transfusion (age 60–70)2.4%2.0%2.3%p < 0.0001
Blood Transfusion (age over 70)4.0%3.4%3.4%p < 0.0001
Acute Kidney Injury (age under 60)0.8%1.1%1.9%p < 0.0001
Acute Kidney Injury (age 60–70)1.1%1.7%3.3%p < 0.0001
Acute Kidney Injury (age over 70)2.5%3.4%5.4%p < 0.0001
Intraoperative Fracture (age under 60)0.7%0.6%0.9%p < 0.0001
Intraoperative Fracture (age 60–70)0.7%0.6%0.8%p < 0.0001
Intraoperative Fracture (age over 70)0.9%0.9%1.1%p = 0.001
Length of stay mean in days (age under 60)1.851.862.08p < 0.0001
Length of stay mean in days (age 60–70)1.861.912.2p < 0.0001
Length of stay mean in days (age over 70)2.252.32.52p < 0.0001
Total charges mean in $ (age under 60)63,62464,06763,741p < 0.0001
Total charges mean in $ (age 60–70)62,65862,59163,423p = 0.052
Total charges mean in $ (age over 70)64,18365,42564,724p < 0.0001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berkovich, Y.; Feygelman, S.; Cohen Nissan, E.; Fournier, L.; Steinfeld, Y.; Maman, D. The Burden of Weight on Joint Replacement: A 1.6 Million-Patient Analysis of BMI and Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes. Surgeries 2025, 6, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6040095

AMA Style

Berkovich Y, Feygelman S, Cohen Nissan E, Fournier L, Steinfeld Y, Maman D. The Burden of Weight on Joint Replacement: A 1.6 Million-Patient Analysis of BMI and Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes. Surgeries. 2025; 6(4):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6040095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berkovich, Yaron, Shelly Feygelman, Ela Cohen Nissan, Linor Fournier, Yaniv Steinfeld, and David Maman. 2025. "The Burden of Weight on Joint Replacement: A 1.6 Million-Patient Analysis of BMI and Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes" Surgeries 6, no. 4: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6040095

APA Style

Berkovich, Y., Feygelman, S., Cohen Nissan, E., Fournier, L., Steinfeld, Y., & Maman, D. (2025). The Burden of Weight on Joint Replacement: A 1.6 Million-Patient Analysis of BMI and Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes. Surgeries, 6(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6040095

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop