Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Paving the Way for the Clean and Feasible Production of 2,5-Dimethylfuran
Previous Article in Journal
E-Waste Wars: The Catalyst Awakens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clean Production of Sugars from Brewer’s Spent Grains Using Subcritical Water Hydrolysis and Steam Explosion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Towards Perovskite Oxide-Based Electrocatalysts with Zero-Critical Elements for Sustainable Energy Production

by
Chiara Aliotta
* and
Francesca Deganello
Institute for the Study of Nanostructured Materials (ISMN)—National Research Council (CNR), Via U. La Malfa 153, 90146 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustain. Chem. 2024, 5(4), 327-329; https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem5040023
Submission received: 17 December 2024 / Accepted: 18 December 2024 / Published: 21 December 2024
The well-being of the Earth and its inhabitants is compromised by the energy and climate crisis that has arisen from the prolonged and uncontrolled utilization of fossil fuels, which has caused a tremendous increase in anthropogenic CO2 and a consistent depletion of natural energy resources. This point of no return forces us as scientists to face the biggest green energy transition in world history, based on multiple effective strategies for clean and renewable energy production with zero-CO2 emissions [1,2]. The development of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technologies constitutes a piece of the clean energy transition puzzle thanks to their efficiency and the possibility of coupling them with co-electrolysis for CO2 recycling [3,4]. At large scale, SOFC stacks can supply gigawatts of electricity for utilization, although a long-term vision must consider the present and future availability of the raw materials required for producing each component of SOFCs [5,6].
Periodically, the European Commission (EU) compiles a list of critical raw materials (CRMs) based on economic, political, and social factors. The last update drawn up by the EU dates back to 2023; in the same year, the U.S. government also released its list of critical materials [7,8]. The governmental reports represent tools that researchers should use for sustainable material development. In addition, the EuChemS periodic table of elements is also a useful tool that classifies elements based on the concepts of “availability”, “sustainability”, and “overuse” [9].
In this context, the development of materials for SOFC components must not fail to take into consideration the critical elements issue, and it needs to move towards zero- or low-critical element contents. Herein, the attention is focused on perovskite oxide-based electrodes for SOFCs working at intermediate temperatures (IT-SOFCs), namely between 600 and 800 °C.
With the general formula ABO3, perovskite oxides have been widely explored as electrocatalysts for SOFCs thanks to their versatility in promoting both oxygen reduction reactions (ORRs) at the cathode and fuel oxidation reactions at the anode. Many studies have dealt with doping strategies both at A- and B-sites, aiming to improve electrochemical properties. Below 800 °C, i.e., at intermediate temperatures, La1−xSrxCo1−yFeyO3 (LSCF) plays a key role as an air electrode, exhibiting high mixed ionic–electronic conductivity and electrocatalytic activity for ORRs, although a lack of performance is due to thermal expansion coefficient mismatch with electrolytes or Gd- or Sm-doped ceria [10,11]. Even Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3 (BSCF) is considered a good cathode material mainly thanks to its high oxygen permeability [10,11].
Unfortunately, lanthanum, strontium, and cobalt—the most used elements in the investigated perovskite oxide-based compositions—are critical [7,8], but studies about perovskite oxide-based cathodes containing low- and/or zero-critical elements are gradually increasing in volume. Most articles treat Co-free perovskites mainly using Fe as a substitute, whereas Sr is generally replaced by alkaline earth metals [12,13,14]. Ca- and Ba-doped LaFeO3 perovskite oxides have recently been investigated as cathodes for IT-SOFC in comparison with La0.6Sr0.4FeO3. In a single-cell configuration, Sr-doping has a major positive influence on electrochemical performance, and Ca- and Ba-doping offer results that bode well for the future substitution of Sr but not of La [12]. Another strategy to mitigate the use of critical metals consists of the introduction of a reduced amount of critical elements, with positive effects, as in the case of Pr0.5Ba0.5Fe0.8Cu0.2O3−δ, where Pr and Cu are critical metals [13]. Moving in this direction, more complex cases are high-entropy perovskite oxides like La0.2Pr0.2Sm0.2Nd0.2Sr0.2FeO3−δ, which, in a single-cell configuration, exhibit prolonged durability at 700 °C [14]. Even if Pr, Nd, and Sm are also critical like Sr and La, the advantages in electrochemical performance due to the higher configurational entropy promoted by the presence of several critical elements in small amounts can be utilized as a way to avoid the massive exploitation of a single critical element in the same material.
In general, it is difficult to maintain good levels of performance with zero-critical element contents in perovskite oxide-based electrocatalysts, and this issue concerns cathode materials as well as anode materials since most of the metals responsible for the electrocatalytic activity towards fuels are considered critical. Over the years, Ni-based cermets have been shown to be the most competitive materials despite electrocatalyst inactivation due to carbon deposition in carbon-rich fuels; however, Ni is listed as critical [7,8,15]. Thus, perovskite oxide-based anodes represent a sustainable challenge that deserves to be faced. Conversely, doped La1−xSrxCrO3 and doped SrTiO3 have been widely investigated with good electrochemical performance with H2- and/or CH4-based fuels [15]. In addition, doped LaFeO3, like Mo-doped La0.6Sr0.4(Co0.2Fe0.8)1−xMoxO3−δ, has been studied for the oxidation of methane, biogas, and methanol [16].
Finally, two important questions emerge from these considerations: (1) How can society move towards sustainable energy using perovskite-based electrocatalysts with a low content of critical elements, whose presence is still needed to reach high levels of efficiency? (2) Is it sustainable to develop materials for renewable energy with zero- or low-critical elements only from natural resources? While looking for reasonable answers, it is urgent to explore new compositions considering the lists of critical materials and, at the same time, to assess technologies that recover from scraps and waste all those critical elements that ensure competitive performance (Figure 1). For perovskite oxide-based electrocatalysts, the game is still open for play, and the outcomes are all in our hands.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jafarizadeh, H.; Yamini, E.; Zolfaghari, S.M.; Esmaeilion, F.; Assad, M.E.H.; Soltani, M. Navigating challenges in large-scale renewable energy storage: Barriers, solutions, and innovations. Energy Rep. 2024, 12, 2179–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2024; IEA: Paris, France, 2024; Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024 (accessed on 17 December 2024).
  3. Chen, R.; Gao, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhang, H.; Motola, M.; Hanif, M.B.; Li, C.-X. From concept to commercialization: A review of tubular solid oxide fuel cell technology. J. Energy Chem. 2024, 97, 79–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mather, G.C.; Zapata-Ramírez, V.; Pérez-Coll, D. Solid oxide fuel cells: State of the art, nanomaterials, and advanced architectures. In Hydrogen Technology Fundamentals and Applications; Cesario, M.R., Menezes de Araújo, A.J., Loureiro, F.J.A., Araujo de Macedo, D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; Chapter 8; pp. 271–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Biswas, S.; Dhawale, D.S.; Hosseini, T.; Kaur, G.; Giddey, S.; Haque, N. A Review on Critical Metals Used in Solid Oxide Cells for Power ↔ X Applications and Materials Recyclability. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 6037–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eikeng, E.; Makhsoos, A.; Pollet, B.G. Critical and strategic raw materials for electrolysers, fuel cells, metal hydrides and hydrogen separation technologies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 71, 433–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. European Commission: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs; Grohol, M.; Veeh, C. Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023–Final Report. Publications Office of the European Union. 2023. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/725585 (accessed on 17 December 2024).
  8. U.S. Department of Energy. What Are Critical Materials and Critical Minerals? Available online: https://www.energy.gov/cmm/what-are-critical-materials-and-critical-minerals (accessed on 17 December 2024).
  9. Element Scarcity—EuChemS Periodic Table. Available online: https://www.euchems.eu/euchems-periodic-table (accessed on 17 December 2024).
  10. Ahmad, M.Z.; Ahmad, S.H.; Chen, R.S.; Ismail, A.F.; Hazan, R.; Baharuddin, N.A. Review on recent advancement in cathode material for lower and intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 1103–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, W.; Sunarso, J.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ge, C.; Wang, W.; Guo, Y.; Ran, R.; Zhou, W. Strategies for improving oxygen ionic conducting in perovskite oxides and their practical applications. Rev. Energy 2024, 3, 100085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qi, H.; Tu, B.; Ou, D.; Tan, Y.; Xiong, C.; Qiu, P. Tuning the ORR catalytic activity of LaFeO3-δ-based perovskite cathode for solid oxide fuel cells by doping with alkaline-earth metal elements. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 5818–5826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhou, D.; Zhu, X.; Wang, N.; Bai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yan, W. A novel Co-free and efficient Pr0.5Ba0.5Fe0.8Cu0.2O3-δ nanofiber cathode material for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 50242–50251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Salman, M.; Saleem, S.; Ling, Y.; Khan, M.; Gao, Y. Improved electrochemical performance of high-entropy La0.8Sr0.2FeO3-based IT-SOFC cathode. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 39475–39484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Beshiwork, B.A.; Lin, B. Recent progress on efficient perovskite ceramic anodes for high-performingsolid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 62, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Javan, K.Y.; Lo Faro, M.; Vecino-Mantilla, S.; Sglavo, V.M. Mo-Doped LSCF as a Novel Coke-Resistant Anode for Biofuel-Fed SOFC. Materials 2024, 17, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Perovskite oxide electrocatalysts for sustainable energy production are obtained from non-critical raw materials and/or from waste-derived sources. (Perovskite oxide image realized using VESTA version 3).
Figure 1. Perovskite oxide electrocatalysts for sustainable energy production are obtained from non-critical raw materials and/or from waste-derived sources. (Perovskite oxide image realized using VESTA version 3).
Suschem 05 00023 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aliotta, C.; Deganello, F. Towards Perovskite Oxide-Based Electrocatalysts with Zero-Critical Elements for Sustainable Energy Production. Sustain. Chem. 2024, 5, 327-329. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem5040023

AMA Style

Aliotta C, Deganello F. Towards Perovskite Oxide-Based Electrocatalysts with Zero-Critical Elements for Sustainable Energy Production. Sustainable Chemistry. 2024; 5(4):327-329. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem5040023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aliotta, Chiara, and Francesca Deganello. 2024. "Towards Perovskite Oxide-Based Electrocatalysts with Zero-Critical Elements for Sustainable Energy Production" Sustainable Chemistry 5, no. 4: 327-329. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem5040023

APA Style

Aliotta, C., & Deganello, F. (2024). Towards Perovskite Oxide-Based Electrocatalysts with Zero-Critical Elements for Sustainable Energy Production. Sustainable Chemistry, 5(4), 327-329. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem5040023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop