Adding Sustainability in Analytical Chemistry Education through Monitoring Aquarium Water Quality
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Final Degree Project Setting
- Gain a comprehensive understanding of various analytical techniques in monitoring water quality.
- Identify and analyze key chemical parameters that affect freshwater aquarium water quality.
- Learn the principles of the calibration and standardization of analytical instruments, ensuring accurate and reliable measurements.
- Develop skills in proper sample collection, preservation, and preparation techniques to maintain the integrity of the water samples during analysis.
- Understand the importance of quality assurance and control in analytical chemistry to minimize errors and ensure data accuracy.
- Practice interpreting analytical data, understanding the implications of different parameter levels on aquarium health and making informed decisions based on the results.
- Develop problem-solving abilities to troubleshoot and resolve analytical challenges that may arise during the course of the project.
- Demonstrate a commitment to laboratory safety, understanding potential hazards associated with specific analytical techniques and how to mitigate them.
- Enhance research skills by conducting literature reviews on aquarium water quality, staying up-to-date with current research, and effectively communicating findings via reports and presentations.
- Collaborate effectively in a team environment, assigning roles and responsibilities, and working together to achieve project goals.
- Explore the impact of aquariums on the environment and explore ways to maintain water quality in an eco-friendly manner.
- Apply the analytical chemistry principles learned in the course to real-world applications and problem-solving in the field of aquarium keeping and water-quality management.
- Understand the ethical considerations involved in aquarium keeping, including responsible pet ownership, conservation, and promoting animal welfare.
2.2. Theoretical Framework
2.2.1. Physicochemical Parameters
2.2.2. Organic Matter
2.2.3. Nitrogen Cycle
2.2.4. Nutrients
2.3. Project Development
2.3.1. Design and Setup of a Freshwater Aquarium
2.3.2. Identification of Water Quality Parameters
2.3.3. Water Analysis
2.3.4. Data Analysis and Statistical Treatment
2.3.5. Experimental Implementation
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Experimental Activities
- Perform a 50% water change in the aquarium, while ensuring that the pH value of the tap water being added is checked beforehand. The pH of the tap water should not exceed the pH of the aquarium water. This corrective action will also help decrease the high silicate concentration identified using the test kit. It is important to note that ammonia and ammonium (NH4+) exist in a chemical equilibrium in the aquatic system, with their relative concentrations determined by pH. Ammonia (NH3) is the initial product of nitrogenous organic waste decomposition, and its presence often indicates the existence of such wastes [50]. Therefore, the ammonium ion content should be kept as low as possible to prevent conversion into NH3, which is highly toxic to fish.
- Increase the carbonate and total hardness reconditioning of the freshwater by adding hydrogen carbonate conditioners and/or mineral salt mixtures. Carbonate hardness directly affects the pH level. However, it is worth mentioning that the commercial conditioner used resulted in an increase in the pH up to a maximum value of 8.5. Additionally, after water conditioning, an increase in electrical conductivity may also be expected.
- Address the low potassium concentration levels by adding potassium fertilizers to the aquatic system. This action is necessary due to the observed burned spots on older leaves and poor plant vigor.
3.2. Attitude and Perception of the Students
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1. Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Dried at 103–105 °C
- Principle: A well-mixed water sample is filtered through a weighed standard glass-fiber filter and the residue retained on the filter is dried to a constant weight at 103 to 105 °C. The increase in the weight of the filter represents the total suspended solids.
- Procedure: A volume of 250 mL of water was filtered under a vacuum through weighed standard glass-fiber filters (pore size 0.45 µm). The filtrates were evaporated in an oven at 103–105°C for one hour, and then the filter was cooled in a desiccator until constant weight was reached.
- Calculation:
- A = weight of filter + dried residue, mg, and
- B = weight of filter, mg
Appendix A.2. Total Hardness—EDTA Titration Method
- Principle: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and its sodium salts (EDTA) form a chelated soluble complex when added to a solution of specific cations. When a small amount of Eriochrome Black T dye is added to an aqueous solution containing calcium and magnesium ions at a pH of 10.0, the solution becomes wine-red. If EDTA is added as a titrant, the calcium and magnesium will be complexed. When all of the magnesium and calcium has been complexed, the solution turns to a blue color, marking the end point of the titration.
- Reagents:Buffer solution: dissolve 6.8 g of ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) in 60 mL of concentrated ammonium hydroxide and dilute to 100 mL with Milli-Q water.Standard EDTA solution 0.01 M: weigh 1.8612 g of analytical reagent-grade disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate dihydrate, dissolve in Milli-Q water, and dilute to 500 mL.Standard EDTA titrant, 0.001 M: take 50 mL of the EDTA 0.01 M solution and dilute to 500 mL with Milli-Q water.
- Procedure: To 50 mL of water sample add 100 mL of Milli-Q water, 10 mL of buffer solution and a spatula tip of Eriochrome Black T into a 250 mL conical flask. Add standard EDTA titrant slowly, with continuous stirring, until the last reddish tinge disappears. At the end point, the solution is blue.
- Calculation:
- V EDTA = mL titration for water sample
- C EDTA = molarity standard EDTA titrant
- MW CaCO3 = molecular weight of the compound, and
- V sample = water sample volume
Appendix A.3. Total Calcium and Magnesium Content
- Principle: The total calcium and magnesium content are determined according to calcium and magnesium hardness. The total hardness of the water sample should be established as described above. For the determination of magnesium hardness, calcium ions are removed from the water sample via precipitation as a calcium carbonate. Thus, only magnesium is titrated with AEDT at pH 10. The calcium hardness is estimated according to the difference in the AEDT volumes used in the titration of the total and magnesium hardness.
- Reagents:Buffer solution: dissolve 6.8 g of ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) in 60 mL of concentrated ammonium hydroxide and dilute to 100 mL with Milli-Q water.Standard EDTA solution 0.01 M: weigh 1.8612 g of analytical reagent-grade disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate dihydrate, dissolve in Milli-Q water and dilute to a final volume of 500 mL in a graduated flask.Standard EDTA titrant, 0.001 M: take 50 mL of the EDTA 0.01 M solution and dilute to 500 mL with Milli-Q water.Sodium-oxalate-saturated solution: dissolve 1.5 g sodium oxalate in 50 mL milli-Q water.
- Procedure: For the determination of magnesium hardness, add a volume of 2.5 mL of buffer solution and 2.5 mL of sodium oxalate saturated solution to 50 mL of water sample. Wait 10 min for the total precipitation of calcium carbonate. Then, filter the mixture thorough a paper filter into a 250 mL conical flask and wash the filter paper carefully with 2 × 2 mL milli-Q water. Add 10 mL of buffer solution and a spatula tip of Eriochrome Black T to the same 250 mL flask and titrate with 0.001 M AEDT solution to a faint blue color.
- Calculation:
- V EDTA Mg hardness = mL titration for water sample in the determination of magnesium hardness
- V EDTA total hardness = mL titration for water sample in the determination of total hardness
- C EDTA = molarity standard EDTA titrant
- AW Mg = magnesium atomic weight
- AW Ca = calcium atomic weight, and
- V sample = water sample volume
Appendix A.4. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)—Permanganate Index Method
- Principle: The basis of the method is the oxidation of the acidified water sample by heating with potassium permanganate for 10 minutes in a boiling water bath. In hot acid solution, chemical oxidation via potassium permanganate results in the reduction of the permanganate Mn(VII) ion to the manganous Mn(II) ion. The remaining unreduced permanganate is determined via the addition of excess sodium oxalate and the back-titration of the excess oxalate with potassium permanganate.COD is estimated thorough the permanganate index (IMn), defined as the mass concentration of oxygen equivalent to the amount of permanganate ion consumed when a water sample is treated with that oxidant under defined conditions.
- Reagents:Potassium permanganate solution 0.05 M: weigh out 1.98 g of potassium permanganate and dissolve in 250 mL of milli-Q water.Potassium permanganate solution 0.002 M: dilute 20 mL of the 0.05 M KMnO4 solution to 500 mL of milli-Q water. This solution must be standardized.Sodium oxalate stock solution 0.02 M (primary standard): dry enough quantity of sodium oxalate Na2C2O4 in an oven at 120 °C for 2 h. Remove and allow to cool in a desiccator. Weigh out 0.6700 ± 0.000l g and dissolve in milli-Q water to one liter in a volumetric flask.Sodium oxalate working solution 0.005 M: pipette out 25 mL of sodium oxalate stock solution (0.02 M) and dilute with water in a 100 mL volumetric flask.
- Procedure: For the standardization of the potassium permanganate solution 0.002 M, add 25 mL of the sodium oxalate stock solution (0.02 M), 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid and 50 mL of milli-Q water into a 250 mL conical flask. The solution is heated in a boiling water bath for 30 min and then titrated using the potassium permanganate solution to a faint pink color.Add 100 mL of water sample, 100 mL of milli-Q water and 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid into a 250 mL conical flask. Heat the flasks for 10 min in a water bath that has previously been raised to boiling. Add 10 mL of 0.002 M potassium permanganate standardized solution. Add 10 mL of 0.005 M sodium oxalate solution 10 min after the addition of the potassium permanganate reagent. Remove the flask from the water bath and titrate the contents, whilst still hot, with 0.002M potassium permanganate solution to a faint pink color, which persists for 30 s.
- Calculation:
- V sample = water sample volume
- MW O2 = oxygen molecular weight
- V oxalate = mL of 0.005 M sodium oxalate solution
- C oxalate = concentration of sodium oxalate solution
- V MnO4 = mL of 0.002 M potassium permanganate standardized solution, and
- C MnO4 = concentration of potassium permanganate standardized solution
Appendix A.5. Ammonium
- Principle: Nessler’s reagent [an alkaline solution of potassium tetraiodomercurate(II)] is employed for the colorimetric determination of ammonium ion in water samples. When Nessler’s reagent is added to a dilute ammonium salt solution, the liberated ammonia reacts with the reagent rapidly to form an orange-brown product.
- Reagents:Zinc sulphate solution 0.35 M: dissolve 2.5 g of zinc sulphate in 25 mL of milli-Q water.EDTA reagent: weigh 12.5 g of disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate dihydrate and 2.50 g of NaOH. Dissolve in 50 mL of Milli-Q water.NaOH solution 5.0 M: dissolve 10 g of NaOH in 50 mL of Milli-Q water.Nessler’s reagent: dissolve 3.5 g of potassium iodide (KI) and 5 g of mercury(II) iodide in 25 mL of NaOH solution 5.0 M and dilute to 50 mL with milli-Q water.Stock ammonium chloride solution 1000 mg L−1: dissolve 0.2965 g of anhydrous NH4Cl, dried at 100 °C, in water, and dilute to 100 mL.Standard ammonium chloride solution 10 mg L−1: take a volume of 0.5 mL from the stock NH4Cl solution and dilute to 50 mL with milli-Q water.
- Procedure: To obtain the external calibration curve, prepare a series of volumetric flasks containing the following volumes of standard ammonium chloride solution diluted to 25 mL: 0.5, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0 and 10 mL. Add 1 drop of EDTA reagent and 1 mL of Nessler’s reagent to each flask. Allow to stand for 10 minutes and measure the absorbance at 400 nm. Prepare similarly a flask containing 0 mL of standard ammonium chloride solution and use it as blank to set zero absorbance on the spectrophotometer.Add 0.5 mL of the zinc sulphate solution 0.35 M and 0.25 mL of the NaOH solution 5.0 M to 50 mL of the water sample. After 10 min, filter to remove the precipitate. Add 1 drop of EDTA reagent and 1 mL of Nessler’s reagent per 25 mL of water sample. Wait 10 min and transfer to a 1 cm spectrophotometer cell and measure the absorbance at 400 nm.
- Calculation: Construct a standard curve by plotting absorbance due to NH4+ against the NH4+ concentration of the standard. The ammonium concentration in the water sample is directly determined via linear interpolation using a calibration curve.
Appendix A.6. Nitrate
- Principle: The determination of nitrate is performed using an ultraviolet (UV) technique that measures the absorbance of NO3– at 220 nm. Since dissolved organic matter also may absorb at 220 nm and NO3– does not absorb at 275 nm, a second measurement made at 275 nm is required to correct the NO3– absorbance value. Acidification with 1N HCl aims to prevent interference from hydroxide or carbonate. Chloride has no effect on the determination.
- Reagents:Stock nitrate solution 300 mg L−1: dry potassium nitrate in an oven at 105 °C for 24 h. Dissolve 0.4887 g in milli-Q water and dilute to 1000 mL. Preserve with 1 mL of CHCl3 per liter of solution.Intermediate nitrate solution 30 mg L−1: dilute 25 mL of stock nitrate solution with 250 mL of milli-Q water. Preserve with 1 mL of CHCl3 per liter of solution.Hydrochloric acid solution, HCl, 1N: dilute 8.30 mL of acid (37.5%) with 100 mL of milli-Q water.
- Procedure: To 50 mL of clear water sample, filtered if necessary, add 1 mL of HCl solution and mix thoroughly. Read absorbance against distilled water set at zero absorbance. Use a wavelength of 220 nm to obtain the NO3– reading and a wavelength of 275 nm to determine interference due to dissolved organic matter.To obtain the external calibration curve, prepare NO3– calibration standards in the range of 0.30 to 12.0 mg L−1 by diluting the following volumes of intermediate nitrate solution to 50 mL: 0.50, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 and 20 mL. Treat NO3– standards in the same manner as samples and measure absorbance at 200 and 275 nm.
- Calculation: For samples and standards, subtract two times the absorbance reading at 275 nm from the reading at 220 nm to obtain absorbance due to NO3–. Construct a standard curve by plotting absorbance due to NO3– against the NO3– concentration of the standard. Using the corrected sample absorbances to obtain sample concentrations directly from standard curve.
Appendix A.7. Nitrite
- Principle: Nitrite is determined via the formation of a reddish-purple azo dye produced at pH 2.0 to 2.5 by coupling diazotized sulfanilamide with N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride.
- Reagents:Color reagent: to 80 mL of water add 10 mL of 85% phosphoric acid and 1 g of sulfanilamide. After dissolving sulfanilamide completely, add 0.1 g of N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride. Mix to dissolve, then dilute to 100 mL with milli-Q water.Solution is stable for about a month when stored in a dark bottle in a refrigerator.Stock nitrite solution 1000 mg L−1: dry sodium nitrite in an oven at 105 °C for 24 h. Dissolve 0.1500 g in milli-Q water and dilute to 100 mL.Intermediate nitrate solution 10 mg L−1: dilute 0.25 mL stock nitrite solution to 25 mL with milli-Q water.
- Procedure: To obtain the external calibration curve, prepare NO2– calibration standards in the range of 2.5 to 100 µg L−1 by diluting the following volumes of intermediate nitrite solution to 50 mL: 12.5, 25, 50, 125, 250 and 500 µL. Add 2 mL of color reagent to the NO2– standards and measure the absorbance at 543 nm after 20 min.Add 2 mL of the color reagent to 50 mL of the water sample and mix thoroughly. Then, 20 min after adding color reagent to the samples, measure the absorbance at 543 nm.
- Calculation: Prepare a standard curve by plotting the absorbance of standards against NO2– concentration. Compute sample concentration directly from calibration curve.
Appendix A.8. Phosphate
- Principle: Orthophosphate determination is performed using the vanadomolybdophosphoric acid colorimetric method. In a dilute orthophosphate solution, ammonium molybdate reacts under acid conditions to form a heteropoly acid, molybdophosphoric acid. In the presence of vanadium, yellow vanadomolybdophosphoric acid is formed. The intensity of the yellow color is proportional to the phosphate concentration.
- Reagents:Vanadate-molybdate reagent: (1) dissolve 20 g of ammonium molybdate, (NH4)6Mo7O24⋅4H2O, in 400 mL of milli-Q water; (2) dissolve 0.5 g of ammonium metavanadate, NH4VO3, in 300 mL of milli-Q water, and add 300 mL of nitric acid (70%). Mix both solutions and dilute to 1 L.Stock phosphate solution 0.698 g L−1: dissolve in milli-Q water 0.1000 g of anhydrous KH2PO4 and dilute to 100 mL.Intermediate phosphate solution 0.0698 g L−1: dilute 10 mL of stock phosphate solution to 100 mL with milli-Q water.
- Procedure: Prepare a calibration curve in the concentration range between 0.05 and 0.30 mg L−1 by first adding 10 mL of vanadate–molybdate reagent, followed by diluting precise volumes of intermediate phosphate solution (12.5, 37.5, 50.0, 62.5 and 75 µL) to a total volume of 25 mL. Prepare a blank in which 10 mL of vanadate–molybdate reagent is diluted to 25 mL with milli-Q water.Place 5 mL of water sample in a 25 mL volumetric flask. Add 10 mL of vanadate–molybdate reagent and dilute to the mark with milli-Q water.After 10 min, measure the absorbance of the calibration standards and samples using 1 cm cells versus the blank at a wavelength of 420 nm.
- Calculation: Prepare a standard curve by plotting the absorbance of standards against the phosphate concentration. Compute the sample concentration directly from the calibration curve considering the dilution ratio.
Appendix A.9. Iron(III)
- Principle: Iron(III) selectively reacts with thiocyanate to yield a series of intensely red-colored compounds. A large excess of thiocyanate should be used in the colorimetric determination, since this increases the intensity and stability of the color. A strong acid, such as nitric acid, must be present to suppress the hydrolysis of the iron(III) cation.
- Reagents:Standard solution of iron(III) 100 mg L−1: dissolve 0.8640 g of ammonium iron(II) sulphate [(NH4)Fe(SO4)2·12H2O] and 0.864 g of ammonium chloride in 10 mL HCl (37.5%) and 40 mL of milli-Q water. Add 1 mL of nitric acid (70%). Heat to the boiling point and once cooled, dilute to 1 L.Potassium thiocyanate solution 10% (w/v): dissolve 5 g of potassium thiocyanate in 50 mL of milli-Q water.
- Procedure: To obtain the external calibration curve, prepare irone(III) calibration standards in the range of 0.25 to 1.50 mg L−1 by diluting the following volumes of the standard solution of iron(III) to 10 mL: 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 µL. Add 0.50 mL of HCl (37.5%) and 1 mL of potassium thiocyanate solution to the iron(III) standards. Measure the absorbance at 480 nm versus a blank prepared in the same manner without iron(III).Put 5 mL of water sample into a 10 mL graduated flask. Add 0.5 mL of HCl (37.5%) and 1 mL of potassium thiocyanate solution. Dilute to 10 mL using milli-Q water. Measure the absorbance of the sample solution in a spectrophotometer at 480 nm.
- Calculation: Determine the concentration of the sample solution by comparing it with the values on the reference curve obtained in the same way using different concentrations of the standard iron solution.
Appendix A.10. Potassium
- Principle: Trace amounts of potassium can be determined via flame emission photometry at a wavelength of 766 nm. The sample is nebulized into a gas flame under controlled and reproducible excitation conditions. The emission light intensity measured at 766 nm is approximately proportional to the potassium concentration.
- Reagents:Stock potassium solution 500 mg L−1: dissolve 0.95 g of KCl dried at 110 °C and dilute to 1000 mL with milli-Q water.Standard potassium solution 50 mg L−1: dilute 10 mL of stock potassium solution with water to 100 mL
- Procedure: Prepare a blank and a series of potassium calibration standards in the concentration range of 0.20–3.0 mg L−1. Determine the emission intensity at 766 nm. Aspirate the calibration standards and water sample several times to secure a reliable average reading for each. Construct a calibration curve from the potassium standards. The water sample is analyzed via a direct-intensity measurement.
- Calculation: The potassium concentration is determined via direct reference to the calibration curve. If necessary, dilute the sample and consider the dilution ratio in calculation.
References
- Barak, M.; Carson, K.M.; Zoller, U. The “Chemistry Is in the News” Project: Can a Workshop Induce a Pedagogical Change? J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 1712–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M.B.; Miller, C.R. Chemistry in the Real World. J. Chem. Educ. 2001, 78, 484–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loyo-Rosales, J.E.; Torrents, A.; Rosales-Rivera, G.C.; Rice, C.P. Linking Laboratory Experiences to the Real World: The Extraction of Octylphenoxyacetic Acid from Water. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 248–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozyra, A.; Skrzypczyk, K.; Stebel, K.; Rolnik, A.; Rolnik, P.; Kućma, M. Remote controlled watercraft for water measurement. Measurement 2017, 111, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piunno, P.A.E.; Boyd, C.; Barzda, V.; Gradinaru, C.C.; Krull, U.J.; Stefanovic, S.; Stewart, B. The Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory: A Student Team Approach to the Fourth-Year Research Thesis Project Experience. J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spelt, E.J.H.; Biemans, H.J.A.; Tobi, H.; Luning, P.A.; Mulder, M. Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2009, 21, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Georgieva, S.; Todorov, P.; Genova, Z.; Peneva, P. Interdisciplinary Project for Enhancing student’s interest in Chemistry. Bulg. J. Sci. Educ. 2016, 25, 122–136. [Google Scholar]
- Juhl, L.; Yearsley, K.; Silva, A.J. Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning through an Environmental Water Quality Study. J. Chem. Educ. 1997, 74, 1431–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bopegedera, A.M.R.P.; Coughenour, C.L. An Interdisciplinary, Project-Based Inquiry into the Chemistry and Geology of Alkaline Surface Lake Waters in the General Chemistry Laboratory. J. Chem. Educ. 2021, 98, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, H.B.; Zamora, F.; Duzgoren-Aydin, N.S. Water Quality Monitoring of an Urban Estuary and a Coastal Aquifer Using Field Kits and Meters: A Community-Based Environmental Research Project. J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 1512–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dameris, L.; Frerker, H.; Darrell Iler, H. The Southern Illinois Well Water Quality Project: A Service-Learning Project in Environmental Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2020, 97, 668–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gawankar, S.; Masten, S.J. Development of an Inexpensive, Rapid Method to Measure Nitrates in Freshwater to Enhance Student Learning. J. Chem. Educ. 2023, 100, 2141–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, A.; Sajid Jillani, S.M.; Alhooshani, K. Water Quality Characterization Using ASTM Methods in an Undergraduate Advanced Instrumental Analysis Laboratory Course. J. Chem. Educ. 2021, 98, 2919–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Hara, P.B.; Sanborn, J.A.; Howard, M. Pesticides in Drinking Water: Project-Based Learning within the Introductory Chemistry Curriculum. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 1673–1677. [Google Scholar]
- Amer, M.A.; Luque-Corredera, C.; Bartolomé, E. Study and Research Path for Learning General Chemistry: Analyzing the Quality of Drinking Water. J. Chem. Educ. 2022, 99, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandler, D.; Blonder, R.; Yayon, M.; Mamlok-Naaman, R.; Hofstein, A. Developing and Implementing Inquiry-Based, Water Quality Laboratory Experiments for High School Students To Explore Real Environmental Issues Using Analytical Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kur, A.; Alaanyi, A.T.; Awuhe, S.T. Determination of quality of water used by students of College of Education, Katsina-Ala through physical and electro-chemical parameters. Sci. World J. 2019, 14, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
- Araújo, J.L.; Morais, C.; Paiva, J.C. Developing and Implementing a Low-Cost, Portable Pedagogical Kit to Foster Students’ Water Quality Awareness and Engagement by Sampling Coastal Waters and Analyzing Physicochemical Properties. J. Chem. Educ. 2020, 97, 3697–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, J.L.; Morais, C.; Paiva, J.C. Students’ attitudes towards the environment and marine litter in the context of a coastal water quality educational citizen science project. Aust. J. Environ. Educ. 2023, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grguric, G. Modeling chemical processes in seawater aquaria to illustrate concepts in undergraduate chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchis, R.; Cardona, S.C.; Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, V.G.; Quijada, C. Enhancing coordination among subjects through hands-on laboratory approach. In Proceedings of the 17th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, 6–8 March 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Caskey, R.P. 4-H Marine Aquarium Adult Partner Guide; PUBLICATION #4H434; UF/IFAS Extension: Milton, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Calascibetta, F.; Campanella, L.; Favero, G. An Aquarium as a Means for the Interdisciplinary Teaching of Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 1311–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keaffaber, J.J.; Palma, R.; Williams, K.R. The role of water chemistry in marine aquarium design: A model system for a General Chemistry class. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spradlin, A.; Saha, S. Saline aquaponics: A review of challenges, opportunities, components, and system design. Aquaculture 2022, 555, 738173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junge, R.; Wilhelm, S.; Hofstetter, U. Aquaponic in classrooms as a tool to promote system thinking. In Transmission of Innovations, Knowledge and Practical Experience into Everyday Practice; Maček, M.A., Maček Jerala, M., Kolenc Artiček, M., Eds.; Biotehniški Center Naklo: Naklo, Slovenia, 2014; pp. 234–244. [Google Scholar]
- Paschalidou, K.; Salta, K.; Koulougliotis, D. Exploring the connections between systems thinking and green chemistry in the context of chemistry education: A scoping review. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 29, 100788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, E.H.; Webb, J.B.; Hollingsworth, C.; Danylchuk, A.J. Managing Expectations for Aquaponics in the Classroom: Enhancing Academic Learning and Teaching an Appreciation for Aquatic Resources. Fisheries 2014, 39, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, T.M. Potentiometric measurements in a freshwater aquarium. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, 340–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westbroek, H.; Klaassen, K.; Bulte, A.; Pilot, A. Characteristics of Meaningful Chemistry Education. In Research and the Quality of Science Education; Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 67–76. [Google Scholar]
- Yavuzcan Yildiz, H.; Robaina, L.; Pirhonen, J.; Mente, E.; Domínguez, D.; Parisi, G. Fish Welfare in Aquaponic Systems: Its Relation to Water Quality with an Emphasis on Feed and Faeces—A Review. Water 2017, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adriano, E.A.; de Oliveira, L.N.; Borrasca, J.C.; de Melo, C.M.R.; Junior, A.F.; de Oliveira, J.E.M. Water Quality Parameters and Their Influence on Fish Health: A Review. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 11, 1109–1126. [Google Scholar]
- Malik, S.; Hussain, S.; Waqas, M.S. Effect of water quality and different meals on growth of Catla catla and Labeo rohita. Big Data Water Resour. Eng. (BDWRE) 2020, 1, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Final Project Guidelines for the Complutense University of Madrid, BS in Chemistry. Available online: https://quimicas.ucm.es/file/gqguia-docente-trabajo-fin-de-grado2020final (accessed on 3 May 2021).
- Somerville, C.; Cohen, M.; Pantanella, E.; Stankus, A.; Lovatelli, A. Small-scale aquaponic food production. In tegrated fish and plant farming. In FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 589; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014; pp. 1–121. [Google Scholar]
- Randall, D.J.; Tsui, T.K.N. Ammonia toxicity in fish. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 45, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clesceri, L.S.; Greenberg, A.E.; Eaton, A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA; American Water Works Association: Denver, CO, USA; Water Environment Federation: Alexadria, VI, USA, 1999; pp. 244–253 (total suspended solids); pp. 494–495 (potassium); pp. 1194–1198 (nitrite); pp. 1198–1200 (nitrate); pp. 1246–1249 (phosphate). [Google Scholar]
- Reeve, R. Introduction to Environmental Analysis, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2002; pp. 35–75. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.P.; Dong, Q.H. Analysis and discussion on the calculation formula of the classical monitoring method of the permanganate index (IMn). J. Educ. Pract. 2018, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Thorarinsdottir, R.I. Aquaponics Guidelines; European Union Lifelong Learning Program: Reykjavik, Iceland, 2015; pp. 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Skoog, D.A.; West, D.M.; Holler, F.J.; Crouch, S.R. Fundamentos de Química Analítica, 8th ed.; McGraw-Hill: Madrid, Spain, 2005; pp. 489–490. [Google Scholar]
- Harris, D.C. Análisis Químico Cuantitativo, 3rd ed.; Reverté: Barcelona, Spain, 2007; p. 277. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 8467:1993; Water Quality—Determination of Permanganate Index. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993.
- Jeffery, G.H.; Basset, J.; Mendham, J.; Denney, R.C. Vogel´s Textbook of Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 5th ed.; Longman Scientific & Technical: Essex, UK, 1989; pp. 679–680 (ammonium); pp. 690–692 (iron); p. 702 (nitrite); pp. 702–704 (phosphate). [Google Scholar]
- JBL Pro Aquatest Lab. Available online: https://www.jbl.de/?mod=products&func=detail&id=8702&country=us&lang=en#2408400 (accessed on 1 February 2021).
- Hargrove, M.; Hargrove, M. Freshwater Aquariums for Dummies, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; p. 99. [Google Scholar]
- Person-Le Ruyet, J.; Chartois, H.; Quemener, L. Comparative acute ammonia toxicity in marine fish and plasma ammonia response. Aquaculture 1995, 136, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, D. Water Quality Assessments: A Guide to the Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 1996; p. 99. [Google Scholar]
- UNECE. Protection of Water Resources and Aquatic Ecosystems; Water Series, No. 1; ECE/ENVWA/31; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 64. [Google Scholar]
- Manahan, S.E. Environmental Chemistry, 9th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; p. 166. [Google Scholar]
- Peña Martínez, J.; Pérez López, R. Los cultivos acuapónicos en la formación inicial de maestros. In Proceedings of the XIV Seminario de Investigación en Educación Ambiental: El Papel del Mundo Rural y de los Conocimientos Tradicionales en la Sostenibilidad; Eugenio-Gozalbo, M., Suárez-López, R., Correa-Guimaraes, A., Longueira Matos, S., Eds.; Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico: Madrid, Spain, 2021; pp. 213–225. [Google Scholar]
Type | Description |
---|---|
General | Recognize and analyze new problems and envisage strategies to solve them. |
Evaluate, interpret, and synthesize chemical data and information. | |
Demonstrate a solid and balanced knowledge base on lab materials and practical skills. | |
Safely handle chemical materials and recognize and assess the risks in the use of chemical substances and procedures of laboratory. | |
Interpret data from observations and measurements in the laboratory in terms of their significance and the theories that support them. | |
Develop appropriate scientific measurement and experimentation practices. | |
Specific | Apply to chemical analysis the knowledge acquired in the study of chemical equilibrium. |
Apply to chemical analysis the fundamentals of the main technique’s analysis and separation instruments. | |
Recognize analytical chemistry as a metrological science that develops, optimizes, and applies measurement processes aimed at obtaining quality analytical chemist information. | |
Transversal | Prepare and write scientific and technical reports. |
Demonstrate critical and self-critical reasoning | |
Adapt to new situations. | |
Manage quality chemical information, bibliography and databases specialized, and resources accessible via the Internet. | |
Use the tools and computer programs that facilitate the treatment of experimental results | |
Communicate using the most common audiovisual media. | |
Develop work autonomously |
Evaluated Item | Evaluator | Descriptors | Weight (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Final dissertation | Student’s tutor | Managing schedules and compliance deadlines | 5 |
Use of the bibliography | 10 | ||
Quality of the work | 40 | ||
Skills progress | 10 | ||
Attitude: motivation, initiative, responsibility, creativity, receptiveness to criticism, etc. | 10 | ||
Autonomous learning capacity | 5 | ||
Knowledge achieved in the field of study | 10 | ||
Formal aspects of the final report | 10 | ||
Teachers’ panel | Objectives and methodology | 20 | |
Results of discussion | 30 | ||
Conclusions | 10 | ||
Bibliography | 10 | ||
Accuracy of the written language | 15 | ||
Quality of the material | 10 | ||
English language use | 5 | ||
Objectives and methodology | 20 | ||
Oral defense | Teachers’ panel | Structure and content of the presentation | 35 |
Quality of the presentation | 20 | ||
Use of language and non-verbal communication | 15 | ||
Answers to the experts’ questions | 25 | ||
English language use | 5 |
Parameter | Determination Method | Basis of Analytical Method/Reactions | Measurement |
---|---|---|---|
EC a | Electrical resistivity | Ability of water to conduct an electric current | Conductivity (µS cm−1) |
pH | Potentiometric | Potential difference between a hydrogen ion-selective glass and a reference electrode | −log [H+] |
TSS b | Gravimetric | Increase in the filter weight | Mass (mg) |
Total water hardness, total calcium and magnesium ions | Complexometric titration | Ca2+ + AEDT ⇄ CaY2− + H+ Mg2+ + AEDT ⇄ MgY2− + H+ ErioT c + Ca2+ ⇄ ErioT-Ca ErioT + Mg2+ ⇄ ErioT-Mg | VAEDT (mL) |
COD–Mn | Redox titration | 2MnO4− + 5C2O42− + 16H+ ⇄ 2Mn2+ + 10CO2 + 8H2O 4MnO4− + 12H+ ⇄ 4Mn2+ + 5O2 + 6H2O | VMnO4− (mL) |
Ammonium ion | Spectrophotometric | 2(HgI4)2− + 4OH− + NH4+ ⇄ HgI(NH2)·HgO + 7I− + 3H2O | Absorbance (400 nm) |
Nitrite ion | Spectrophotometric | Formation of a reddish-purple azo dye via the coupling of diazotized sulfanilamide with N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride | Absorbance (543 nm) |
Nitrate ion | Spectrophotometric | Absorbance measurements of NO3− and dissolved organic matter | Absorbance (220, 275 nm) |
Phosphate ion | Spectrophotometric | (PO4)3− + (VO3)− + 11(MoO4)2− + 22H+ ⇄ P(VMo11O40)3− + 11H2O | Absorbance (420 nm) |
Iron(III) ion | Spectrophotometric | Formation of red-colored complexes [Fe(SCN)n]3−n (n = 1–6) | Absorbance (480 nm) |
Potassium ion | Atomic emission | Characteristic emission from previously excited K atoms in the flame measured using a flame photometer at a λ of emission | Iem d (766 nm) |
Analytical Methods Parameter | Result a | RSD b (%) | Commercial Kit Parameter | Result a |
---|---|---|---|---|
EC | (192.7 ± 0.7) µS cm−1 | 0.31 | ||
pH | 8.15 ± 0.06 | 0.62 | pH | 7.4 |
TSS | (12 ± 2) mg L−1 | 6.5 | Silicate content | 2 mg SiO2 L−1 |
Total water hardness | (52 ± 2) mg CaCO3 L−1 | 1.6 | Total hardness | 4 °dH |
Total calcium content | (17 ± 1) mg L−1 | 3.3 | Carbonate hardness | 3 °dH |
Total magnesium content | (2.3 ± 0.2) mg L−1 | 4.3 | Copper content | <0.05 mg L−1 |
COD-Mn | (2.11 ± 0.08) mg O2 L−1 | 1.6 | Oxygen content | 6 mg L−1 |
Ammonium content | (0.89 ± 0.03) mg L−1 | 1.8 | Ammonium content | <0.05 mg L−1 |
Nitrite content | (19 ± 2) µg L−1 | 13 | Nitrite content | 0.05 mg L−1 |
Nitrate content | (5.7 ± 0.7) mg L−1 | 7.1 | Nitrate content | 1 mg L−1 |
Phosphate content | (0.6 ± 0.1) mg L−1 | 12 | Phosphate content | <0.1 mg L−1 |
Iron(III) content | (0.17 ± 0.01) mg L−1 | 2.3 | Iron(III) content | <0.02 mg L−1 |
Potassium content | (1.18 ± 0.01) mg L−1 | 0.65 |
Parameter | Optimum Values a |
---|---|
EC | <1500 µS cm−1 |
pH | 7.0–8.5 |
TSS | (25–100) mg L−1 |
Total water hardness | (89–285) mg CaCO3 L−1 |
COD–Mn | <10 mg O2 L−1 |
Oxygen | (4–8) mg L−1 |
Copper content | <0.05 mg L−1 |
Ammonium content | <0.10 mg L−1 |
Nitrite content | <0.50 mg L−1 |
Nitrate content | <30 mg L−1 |
Phosphate content | <0.40 mg L−1 |
Iron(III) content | (0.1–0.2) mg L−1 |
Potassium content | ≈10 mg L−1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rosales-Conrado, N.; Peña-Martínez, J. Adding Sustainability in Analytical Chemistry Education through Monitoring Aquarium Water Quality. Sustain. Chem. 2023, 4, 282-303. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem4030021
Rosales-Conrado N, Peña-Martínez J. Adding Sustainability in Analytical Chemistry Education through Monitoring Aquarium Water Quality. Sustainable Chemistry. 2023; 4(3):282-303. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem4030021
Chicago/Turabian StyleRosales-Conrado, Noelia, and Juan Peña-Martínez. 2023. "Adding Sustainability in Analytical Chemistry Education through Monitoring Aquarium Water Quality" Sustainable Chemistry 4, no. 3: 282-303. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem4030021
APA StyleRosales-Conrado, N., & Peña-Martínez, J. (2023). Adding Sustainability in Analytical Chemistry Education through Monitoring Aquarium Water Quality. Sustainable Chemistry, 4(3), 282-303. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem4030021