Previous Article in Journal
Persistent Right Umbilical Vein: Clinical Case and Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Environmental Pollution, Endocrine Disruptors, and Metabolic Status: Impact on Female Fertility—A Narrative Review

by
Cristina-Diana Popescu
1,
Romina Marina Sima
2,3,
Mircea-Octavian Poenaru
2,3,*,
Ancuta-Alina Constantin
4,5,
Gabriel-Petre Gorecki
6,7,
Andrei-Sebastian Diaconescu
2,8,
Mara Mihai
2,9,
Cristian-Valentin Toma
2,10 and
Liana Pleș
2,3
1
Department PhD, IOSUD, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
2
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “St John” Hospital, “Bucur” Maternity, 050013 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Cardio-Thoracic Pathology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
5
Institute of Pneumology “Marius Nasta”, 050159 Bucharest, Romania
6
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, “Titu Maiorescu” University, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
7
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, CF2 Clinical Hospital, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
8
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
9
Department of Oncologic Dermatology, “Elias” Emergency University Hospital, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
10
“Prof Dr Theodol Burghele” Clinical Hospital, 010024 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Reprod. Med. 2025, 6(4), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040037
Submission received: 9 September 2025 / Revised: 6 November 2025 / Accepted: 11 November 2025 / Published: 18 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Reproductive Medicine in Europe)

Abstract

Objectives: Female fertility is increasingly threatened by environmental pollutants such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and NO2), endocrine-disrupting chemicals (BPA, phthalates, PFAS, and PCBs), and microplastics. These exposures are associated with impaired ovarian reserve, reduced implantation rates, and lower assisted reproductive technology (ART) success. Given the rising prevalence of obesity and weight-loss interventions, particularly bariatric surgery, understanding the combined influence of metabolic and environmental factors on reproductive outcomes is of critical importance. This review aimed to synthesize recent evidence on how these exposures interact to affect female fertility. Methods: A narrative review was conducted of studies published between 2019 and 2025 using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library. The PubMed Boolean search string was “female fertility”, “ovarian function”, “IVF” and “pollution”, “endocrine disruptors”, “air pollutants”, and “microplastics”. Searches were limited to English language publications, with the last search performed on 30 March 2025. Human, animal, and in vitro data were screened separately. Human evidence was prioritized, and confounding factors (age, BMI, and smoking) were considered during interpretation. Results: Environmental pollutants were consistently associated with diminished ovarian reserve, poor oocyte quality, and reduced live birth rates in ART. PFAS exposure correlated with lower fecundability, while PM2.5 and NO2 were linked to decreased AMH and AFC levels. Mechanistic animal and in vitro studies support these findings through pathways involving oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, and epigenetic alterations. Rapid metabolic changes, particularly post-bariatric surgery, may transiently increase circulating lipophilic toxicants and reduce antioxidant defenses, amplifying reproductive vulnerability. Conclusions: Environmental exposures, especially PM2.5, NO2, PFAS, and microplastics, adversely influence ovarian and embryonic competence. Rapid metabolic transitions may further modulate this susceptibility through pollutant mobilization and micronutrient imbalances. Future interdisciplinary prospective studies integrating exposure monitoring, metabolic profiling, and reproductive endpoints are essential to guide clinical recommendations and precision fertility counseling.

1. Introduction

Infertility, defined as the inability to achieve pregnancy after 12 months of regular and unprotected sexual intercourse, affects between 8 and 12% of couples of reproductive age globally. Environmental and metabolic determinants have emerged as two major, interrelated contributors to this burden. Obesity, regarded as a metabolic pandemic, is associated with an increased prevalence of infertility in women, through endocrine, inflammatory, and ovulatory mechanisms. In the obese female population, the risk of infertility is approximately 2–3 times higher compared to normal-weight women [1,2]. The main pathophysiologic mechanisms involved include insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction, and chronic low-grade inflammation. These are associated with menstrual cycle disorders, decreased oocyte quality, and reduced chances of natural conception [3].
In the past decade, metabolic improvement strategies have emerged as effective approaches not only for sustained weight reduction but also for restoring reproductive function. By decreasing visceral adipose mass, normalizing the hormonal profile, and lowering insulin levels, such interventions can lead to the resumption of ovulation and increased spontaneous pregnancy rates, even in women with polycystic ovary syndrome [4]. These approaches may carry medium- and long-term risks such as nutritional deficiencies (iron, folate, vitamin B12, and vitamin D), which may affect fertility and pregnancy outcome [5].
In parallel, a rapidly expanding body of evidence underscores the significant role of environmental exposures—such as air pollutants, endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), heavy metals, and microplastics—in impairing female reproductive potential. These agents act through hormonal interference, oxidative stress, and direct effects on ovogenesis and endometrial receptivity [6]. While metabolic interventions target intrinsic physiological determinants of fertility, environmental toxicants represent external, modifiable stressors that can exacerbate or attenuate reproductive outcomes depending on metabolic context.
Despite the separate acknowledgment of both domains—metabolic health interventions and environmental exposures—in infertility research, their intersection remains poorly integrated in current reproductive medicine literature. Relevant data on the specific influence of pollutants in women undergoing major metabolic transitions (such as post-bariatric recovery or rapid weight loss) are still limited.
The primary aim of this narrative review is to synthesize recent human clinical evidence on how environmental exposures—including air pollutants (PM2.5, NO2, O3), endocrine-disrupting chemicals (BPA, phthalates, PFAS, PCBs), heavy metals, and microplastics—are associated with ovarian reserve, assisted reproductive technology outcomes, and time-to-pregnancy. Each study is tagged at first mention as Human clinical, Human exposure, Animal, and In Vitro, ensuring consistent evidence tiering. Specifically, this review addresses the following question: “What is the human clinical evidence that environmental pollution and endocrine-disrupting chemicals influence female fertility outcomes and how might metabolic status (including obesity, rapid weight loss, or bariatric surgery) modify these effects?” The target population includes women of reproductive age seeking conception, and the outcomes of interest are ovarian reserve markers, ART outcomes, and time to pregnancy. Additionally, we examine how metabolic status may act as a potential effect modifier rather than a primary determinant of these environmental exposures.

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted a narrative literature review aimed at exploring the impact of reproductive disorders, including infertility, on women’s quality of life across different life stages. This review aimed to synthesize the available evidence rather than perform a systematic meta-analysis. A particular focus was placed on studies examining the intersection between environmental exposures and metabolic factors as modifiers of reproductive outcomes.
The objective of this synthesis was to raise awareness regarding the multifactorial burden of infertility in the context of modern stressors and environmental challenges. The primary review question guiding this synthesis was: “What is the human clinical evidence that ambient air pollution (PM2.5, NO2, and O3), endocrine-disrupting chemicals (BPA, phthalates, PFAS, and PCBs), heavy metals, and microplastics affect ovarian reserve, assisted reproductive technology outcomes, and time-to-pregnancy, and how might metabolic status modify these effects in women of reproductive age?”
To inform our analysis, we performed a targeted search of the literature published between January 2019 and March 2025 in PubMed and other major academic databases (Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, and Google Scholar), using combinations of keywords such as “infertility”, “environmental exposure”, “endocrine disruption”, “female fertility”, “pollution”, and “ovarian function”. The Boolean search string used in PubMed was as follows: “female fertility”, “infertility”, “ovarian reserve”, “IVF” or “assisted reproduction” AND “pollution”, “PM2.5”, “NO2”, “air pollution”, “endocrine disruptors”, “phthalates”, “BPA”, “PFAS”, “PCBs”, and “microplastics”. The last search was conducted on 31st March 2025.
Only English language studies were included, with no restriction on publication type, provided that reproductive outcomes were reported. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, followed by a full-text review. A total of 1432 titles were screened and 213 full texts were reviewed. Screening was performed by a single reviewer, with discussion among co-authors for ambiguous cases. Studies were eligible if they included human participants of reproductive age, assessed exposure to environmental pollutants or endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and reported reproductive outcomes such as clinical pregnancy, live birth, or time-to-pregnancy. Studies focused exclusively on males; those with irrelevant outcomes or non-English language articles were excluded.
Each included study was categorized according to its evidence tier: human clinical, human exposure, animal, or in vitro, to distinguish mechanistic from clinical findings. Although all tiers were considered during the search, human data were prioritized and analyzed separately to maintain clinical relevance. Each human study was evaluated for methodological quality and risk of bias, including control for key confounders such as age, BMI, smoking status, and socioeconomic factors. Confounding control was verified qualitatively based on whether these variables were adjusted for in multivariate or regression analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Interplay of Metabolic and Environmental Factors in Female Reproductive Health

3.1.1. Infertility in Obese Women: Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

Obesity influences fertility through a series of complex endocrine-metabolic mechanisms that affect reproductive function at the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian level. At the central level, excess adipose tissue causes an increase in leptin and leptin resistance, leading to altered pulsatile GnRH secretion. In parallel, hyperinsulinemia associated with insulin resistance increases ovarian androgen production and inhibits SHBG synthesis, amplifying hyperandrogenism [7,8]. These hormonal imbalances contribute to chronic anovulation, PCOS-like manifestations, and altered follicular microenvironment. These findings were derived from human clinical and large-scale observational cohort studies.
Pro-inflammatory adipocytokines (IL-6, TNF-α) secreted by visceral adipose tissue promoted chronic low-grade inflammation, which impaired ovulatory function and endometrial receptivity [9]. This inflammatory background also disrupts granulosa cell function and endometrial vascularization, both essential for implantation. Studies demonstrated an inverse correlation between BMI and AMH levels, suggesting impaired ovarian reserve in obesity [10]. These results are derived from human clinical cohorts assessing ovarian reserve markers.
Obesity is characterized by a deficiency in adiponectin, an adipokine that plays a crucial role in regulating ovarian function. Low adiponectin levels observed in obese women are associated with diminished AMH and kisspeptin expression, both vital for follicular development and the maintenance of ovarian reserve. This deficit contributed to impaired oocyte maturation and ovulatory dysfunction, further exacerbating infertility risks in this population [11]. Evidence originates primarily from human serum and follicular fluid analyses, indicating that local ovarian signaling pathways are significantly affected by metabolic dysregulation.
Oxidative stress caused by elevated free fatty acids and chronic inflammation in obesity leads to mitochondrial dysfunction in oocytes, impairing their quality and reducing fertilization potential. High levels of reactive oxygen species induced apoptosis in granulosa cells and disrupted follicular development, as shown in clinical studies [12]. Mechanistic insights are supported by both human clinical and in vitro investigations, highlighting the crucial role of oxidative imbalance in ovarian aging and poor reproductive performance.
Obesity significantly contributed to subfertility and infertility in women, often worsening reproductive outcomes regardless of conception method. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a leading cause of infertility, is frequently associated with overweight and obesity. Weight loss remained the most effective approach to improve fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Emerging evidence highlighted a pathophysiological link between obesity, altered glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) activity, and PCOS development. GLP-1 receptor agonists have shown promising results in promoting weight loss and reducing androgen levels in obese women with PCOS [13,14] (human clinical intervention studies).
An important study identified significant links between specific metabolites and female reproductive endocrine disorders such as PCOS, endometriosis, and female infertility. Some metabolites were associated with increased risk, while others appeared protective, underscoring the complex metabolic influences on these conditions [15]. These findings were derived from human plasma and follicular metabolomic analyses.
Obesity negatively impacts female fertility through multiple mechanisms, including hormonal imbalances, disruption of the hypothalamus–pituitary–ovarian axis, and altered menstrual cycles, leading to higher rates of oligo or anovulation. Elevated leptin levels in obese women may reduce fecundity, while obesity also impairs endometrial development and implantation. Women with obesity and PCOS tended to exhibit more severe symptoms and greater fertility challenges. Additionally, obesity reduced the effectiveness of assisted reproductive technologies, as shown in human IVF cohort studies [16].
A non-linear association was found between bedtime and infertility, with increased infertility risk observed in women who go to bed after 22:45. This relationship was stronger among women with higher BMI. These findings suggested that a late bedtime may contribute to infertility risk, highlighting the importance of sleep timing in reproductive health for women of childbearing age (human observational study); sleep and circadian rhythm disruption may amplify insulin resistance and reproductive hormonal imbalance, providing a novel behavioral target for fertility optimization [17].
Obesity increased the risk of infertility, though many obese individuals remained fertile. In women, obesity was linked to ovulatory dysfunction, reduced ovarian response, impaired oocyte and endometrial function, and lower IVF success rates. It also raises risks for maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy. Weight loss through lifestyle changes, medical treatments, or bariatric surgery can improve fertility, especially in anovulatory women, though improvements in live birth rates are less certain (human clinical cohorts) [18]. Overall, evidence supports that metabolic health restoration enhances reproductive potential, yet environmental exposures may modulate these outcomes.

3.1.2. Bariatric Surgery, Rapid Weight Loss and Fertility (Text About Bariatric Surgery Only to Illustrate Metabolic Status as a Potential Modifier of Environmental Exposure)

Bariatric interventions were consistently associated with restoration of ovulatory function. Significant postoperative weight loss resulted in decreased insulinemia, increased SHBG, normalization of FSH and LH values, and resumption of regular ovulatory cycles (human clinical and observational evidence) [19].
Studies suggest an increase in conception rates following bariatric surgery compared with standard medical management (human observational and meta-analytic evidence). However, causality cannot be inferred, as most studies are observational and subject to confounding by age and baseline metabolic severity [20].
The immediate postoperative period was associated with important nutritional risks (iron, vitamin B12, folate, zinc, and vitamin D deficiency), which may negatively influence oocyte quality and embryo development [21]. Societies such as ASRM and ASMBS recommended postponing pregnancy for at least 12–18 months post-bariatric to allow metabolic stabilization and correction of deficiencies. Similar caution is advisable following rapid weight loss from restrictive diets or other intensive interventions, as the associated metabolic changes and potential nutrient deficiencies may also impact fertility and pregnancy outcomes [22]. From an environmental health perspective, these metabolic shifts may also alter the distribution and mobilization of lipophilic pollutants, temporarily increasing circulation levels after rapid adipose reduction. This reinforces the need to interpret fertility improvements after bariatric surgery in light of possible transient increases in systemic toxicants burden.
In addition to the restoration of spontaneous ovulation, recent data suggested that bariatric surgery or rapid weight loss may also enhance the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), including in vitro fertilization (IVF). A multicenter retrospective study showed that women with a history of bariatric surgery achieved comparable cumulative live birth rates to non-surgical controls when matched for age and BMI [23]. This improvement was thought to stem not only from normalization of the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis, but also from reductions in systemic inflammation and endocrine dysregulation associated with obesity [24]. These associations remain correlative; mechanistic confirmation from controlled prospective cohorts is still lacking.
Beyond hormonal rebalancing, bariatric surgery or rapid weight loss through very low-calorie or restrictive diets have been associated with modulation of adipokines, such as leptin and adiponectin, which are closely linked to reproductive dysfunction. This leads to decreased leptin levels, which may restore gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulsatility and downstream luteinizing hormone secretion, thereby promoting folliculogenesis and ovulation [25]. The surgery-induced decline in inflammatory cytokines, particularly interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, has been correlated with improvements in endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation potential [26]. The anatomical and absorptive changes introduced by these procedures warrant careful preconceptional counseling.
The risk of persistent deficiencies, particularly in iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12, remained substantial, even with adherence to supplementation protocols. These micronutrient deficiencies have been implicated in impaired DNA synthesis, abnormal oocyte maturation, and neural tube defects [27]. For this reason, international guidelines emphasize the importance of thorough nutritional assessment and individualized care prior to conception in women with a history of bariatric surgery or rapid weight loss through very low-calorie or restrictive diets [28].
Early conception may increase the risk of small-for-gestational-age infants, which can be mitigated by delaying pregnancy and ensuring proper nutrition. Bariatric surgery or rapid weight loss through very low-calorie or restrictive diets were also linked to lower risks of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery. Breast milk composition appeared unaffected, though further research is needed. Optimal outcomes required specialized prenatal care and consistent micronutrient supplementation [29].
Importantly, given the lipophilic nature of many endocrine-disrupting chemicals, rapid weight loss may transiently elevate circulating pollutant concentrations, potentially modifying ovarian and endometrial responses to toxic exposure. This concept supports interpreting post-surgical fertility improvements within a broader environmental health framework. While bariatric surgery showed strong potential in fertility care, consistent research methods and thorough multidisciplinary follow-up are essential to ensure safe and effective outcomes [30].
Obesity negatively affects reproductive health, but bariatric surgery or rapid weight loss through very low-calorie diets has proven effective in promoting long-term weight loss and improving fertility outcomes. In women, this intervention enhances hormonal balance and increases both spontaneous conception and ART success rates. In men, weight loss improves sexual function and hormone levels, though its impact on sperm quality remains unclear [31] (Table 1) (human clinical and observational studies). Overall, metabolic recovery represents a key modifier of environmental susceptibility, warranting integrated assessment of both pollutant exposure and metabolic state in reproductive medicine.

3.1.3. Environmental Factors Relevant to Fertility (Table 2)

Female fertility is influenced by a variety of endogenous and exogenous factors, among which environmental exposures play an increasingly documented role. In recent years, research has focused on how air pollutants, endocrine disruptors, heavy metals, tobacco, and emerging contaminants (such as microplastics) interfere with reproductive physiology, with direct effects on oocytes, hormonal axis, embryonic development, and implantation success. These associations are supported by evidence from human observational cohorts and mechanistic in vitro studies [34].
Air pollution, in particular exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3), has been associated with decreased fecundability and poorer outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. Epidemiological cohort studies have demonstrated that higher levels of PM2.5 and NO2 were inversely correlated with live birth rates, even after adjusting for confounders such as age and BMI. Proposed mechanisms include systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and epigenetic alterations in ovarian and endometrial tissue, supported by human mechanistic and in vitro studies [35].
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are ubiquitous in plastic packaging, cosmetics, food containers, or textiles. These substances may exhibit estrogenic or antiandrogenic activity and can disrupt the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis. Several clinical studies reported that elevated urinary concentrations of endocrine-disrupting chemicals metabolites and lower antral follicle count lead to reduced anti-Müllerian hormone levels and impaired oocyte quality in IVF patients [36,37].
Heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, and mercury accumulate in ovarian tissue and induce oxidative stress, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction. A case–control study among infertile women revealed significantly higher cadmium concentrations in women with diminished ovarian reserve, correlating with decreased fertilization rates [38]. Cadmium and lead interfere with follicular development by inhibiting aromatase expression and disturbing oestradiol synthesis, potentially leading to anovulation, a mechanism supported by human in vitro and cohort studies [3].
Emerging contaminants, particularly microplastics, represent a novel threat to reproductive health. Recent human cohort data have confirmed the presence of microplastic fragments in human follicular fluid. Their presence raises concerns regarding direct physical and biochemical interactions with maturing oocytes. These particles may serve as carriers for endocrine-disrupting chemical and heavy metals, amplifying their local toxic potential. Experimental models demonstrated that exposure to polystyrene particles disrupts spindle formation and meiotic progression in mammalian oocytes [39] (animal and in vitro models, with preliminary human clinical detection).
Lifestyle-related environmental factors such as active and passive tobacco smoke exposure, also exerted significant negative effects on female fertility. Cigarette smoke contains over 7000 chemicals, including known reproductive toxicants. These can lead to impaired ovarian vascularization, accelerated follicular atresia, and increased aneuploidy rates in oocytes, as shown in human epidemiological and mechanistic in vitro studies [40].
While current smoking status (active or passive) was not universally linked to reduced ovarian reserve, a dose-dependence has been observed. Each additional cigarette smoked daily, and greater cumulative exposure (pack-years), increases the odds of diminished ovarian reserve, particularly among non-PCOS women and long-term smokers. Smoking thus remains a major risk factor for impaired fertility and earlier menopause, as well as for adverse maternal-fetal outcomes. Smoking cessation before conception is strongly recommended [41,42,43]
Although e-cigarettes are marketed as safer alternatives, they also contain harmful substances including nicotine and toxic compounds from flavorings that may negatively impact fertility. Animal studies raised concerns about their reproductive effects, but human data were limited. Given the increasing use of e-cigarettes, more research is needed, and caution is advised regarding their impact on reproductive health (animal studies and limited human observational reports) [44].
Taken together, the cumulative burden of environmental exposures may be particularly deleterious in women with pre-existing metabolic or endocrine vulnerability such as those with a history of bariatric surgery or rapid weight loss. These conditions may modify susceptibility to environmental toxicants by altering metabolic clearance, hormonal balance, or micronutrient availability, a hypothesis supported by human cohort observations and mechanistic reasoning.

3.1.4. Presence of Microplastics in Follicular Fluid

A recent study revealed for the first time the presence of microplastics (MP < 10 µm) in follicular fluid of women undergoing in vitro fertilization (n = 18), with a mean concentration of ~2 191 particles/mL found in 14 of 18 samples [3] (human clinical cohort). Complementary in vitro studies demonstrated that comparable concentrations of microplastics impair bovine oocyte maturation and alter proteomic profiles related to oxidative stress and DNA integrity (animal and in vitro studies). These findings introduced a new dimension to female reproductive toxicology. While these findings in bovine models provide mechanistic insights, their direct translation to human reproductive outcomes remains to be confirmed. Given that follicular fluid mediates oocyte development, the intrusion of microplastics and their potential to carry endocrine-disrupting chemicals into the ovarian microenvironment raised concerns regarding possible effects on oocyte competency and subsequent fertilization rates, a hypothesis based on human clinical detection and animal mechanistic data [45].
Micro and nanoplastics (MNPs) are emerging environmental pollutants that may severely impair female fertility. Animal studies show that MNP exposure is associated with damaged ovarian function, reduced follicle count, disrupted hormonal balance, and may influence fetal development. MNPs have been detected in human placenta, breast milk, and infant tissues (human observational data), raising concerns about reproductive and generational health. Further research is needed to understand their full impact on human fertility (animal and limited human observational data) [46].
A recent animal study detected microplastics in the placenta and fetuses of pregnant cats at early gestational stages. The findings suggested that microplastics can cross the placental barrier and accumulate in fetal tissues, highlighting potential early exposure risks during pregnancy [47].

3.1.5. Microplastics, Endocrine Disruptors and Oocyte Quality

Microplastics can act as vectors for toxicants, potentially carrying endocrine-disrupting chemicals into ovarian tissue (human and mechanistic studies tagged consistently). Studies show that high affinity exists between polystyrene particles and EDCs, suggesting a “Trojan horse” mechanism whereby microplastics may introduce pollutants directly into ovarian tissue. In vitro exposure to polyethylene microplastics has been associated with elevated expression of inflammation related genes and increased reactive oxygen species in follicular cells, which may impair oocyte quality (animal and in vitro studies, evidence tagged consistently) [48].
A recent study demonstrated the presence of microplastics in human follicular fluid—human observational study (first evidence of direct human detection) and investigated their effects on oocyte maturation. Functional tests in mice showed that smaller particles can enter the oocytes, while larger particles remained attached to the outside (animal mechanistic study). While these findings are based on in vitro and animal models, they provide mechanistic insights; their direct translation to human reproductive outcomes remains uncertain. All types of microplastics tested were associated with significantly affected oocyte maturation. These findings suggest that microplastic contamination in human follicular fluid may negatively impact female fertility by disrupting oocyte development [49].
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals were increasingly recognized as threats to human reproduction because they interfere with the hormone signaling essential for conception and maintenance of pregnancy. These chemicals are thought to act by disrupting hormone receptors, signaling pathways, epigenetics, and hormone metabolism. Persistent chemicals continue to be detected in ovarian follicular fluid, indicating ongoing exposure of oocytes. Associations between their presence and poorer outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies have been reported. These observations highlight an urgent need for further research to confirm causal links and to inform evidence-based regulatory policies to reduce exposure and protect reproductive health (human clinical and observational studies) [50].

3.1.6. Rapid Weight Loss Improves Fertility but Introduces Oxidative and Toxicant Vulnerability

Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses confirmed that rapid weight loss, through intensive interventions such as very low-calorie diets or medically supervised programs, is associated with significant enhancement of fertility in obese women (human clinical and meta-analytic studies). A comprehensive meta-analysis (n = 231) reported improved conception rates following substantial weight reduction (human clinical cohort) [20]. A 2024 PMC study (n = 444) corroborated improvements in hormonal profiles, menstrual regularity, and spontaneous pregnancies within 12 months after rapid weight loss (human observational study). These findings position controlled, significant weight reduction as an effective intervention for obesity-related reproductive dysfunction, with evidence primarily from human studies [1].
Rapid adipose tissue catabolism may mobilize stored lipophilic toxicants, including EDCs and PFAS, potentially leading to transient elevations in circulation and exposure to ovarian fluid (mechanistic reasoning based on human and animal data). No measurements of serum or follicular toxicant levels post weight loss exist, highlighting a knowledge gap. Such interventions may also predispose to deficiencies in key micronutrients (iron, folate, B12, vitamin D, and zinc) that are essential for antioxidant enzyme function. These deficiencies may heighten oxidative damage in ovarian tissues if toxic exposures occur concomitantly [33,51].
A systematic review and meta-analysis examined how rapid weight loss affects maternal health in the periconceptional period and its implications for reproduction. Analyzing 51 studies, the authors found that substantial weight reduction is associated with improved fertility by restoring hormonal balance and menstrual regularity (human clinical studies). It also increased the risk of vitamin deficiencies due to rapid weight loss, which can affect maternal and fetal health. The review highlighted the need for tailored preconception care following rapid weight reduction, including delaying pregnancy until weight stabilizes and vitamin levels are corrected. Regular monitoring and supplementation are recommended, and long-term follow-up is essential to optimize reproductive outcomes after rapid weight loss [52].
A prospective study investigated the effects of rapid weight loss on hormonal and clinical parameters in 67 obese women evaluated before and at 3 and 6 months after intensive weight reduction. Significant weight loss was observed, especially in the first 3 months, along with marked hormonal changes. Androstenedione and total testosterone levels decreased, while SHBG, AMH, and DHEA-S increased. No significant changes in FSH and LH were observed. Clinically, the prevalence of hirsutism and polycystic ovarian morphology decreased, and dysmenorrhea improved. These findings indicate that rapid weight reduction is associated with improvements in hormonal balance and reproductive health in women with obesity (human clinical cohort) [53].

3.1.7. PFAS Compounds: Links to Reduced Fecundability and Time to Pregnancy

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFOA, PFOS, and PFNA) accumulated in adipose tissue and persist in circulation. A prospective cohort study reported that increasing PFAS quartiles were associated with lower fecundability, although exact effect sizes depend on study design and sample size (human clinical cohort). PFDA and PFOS were associated with reduced clinical pregnancy and live birth odds (human observational study) [54]. Earlier research in European populations confirmed associations between PFAS exposure and prolonged time to pregnancy. Mechanistic studies implicated PFAS in disrupting steroidogenesis and endometrial function (animal and in vitro mechanistic studies) [55].
It is plausible that PFAS sequestered in adipose tissue may be mobilized during rapid fat loss, transiently increasing serum PFAS exposure and potentially affecting ovarian function or early embryonic development (hypothesis supported by mechanistic reasoning).
In women, PFAS have been associated with a disrupted hypothalamic–pituitary axis, decreased FSH and LH levels, affected folliculogenesis, and reduced oocyte quality (human observational and mechanistic studies). In men, PFAS exposure has been associated with adverse effects on sperm motility and morphology, testosterone production, and essential processes such as capacitation and acrosome response. PFAS also compromised post fertilization embryonic development. The published studies strengthen the evidence that PFAS exposure is associated with impaired gamete function and fertilization potential, highlighting their significant threat to human reproductive health (human observational and mechanistic studies) [56].
A cross-sectional study examined the impact of serum PFAS exposure on pregnancy and live birth rates in US women aged 20–50 years. Six PFAS compounds were analyzed, adjusting for demographic and reproductive factors. All models showed negative associations between PFAS levels and the number of pregnancies and live births, with Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) showing the strongest effect (human clinical cohort). These findings highlight that PFAS exposure is associated with reduced reproductive outcomes in women of reproductive age (human observational data) [57].

3.1.8. Ambient Air Pollution Impairs Ovarian Reserve and ART Outcomes

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NO2/NOₓ) were repeatedly associated with reduced ovarian reserve. A large human cohort (n = 2212) reported that PM2.5 exposure during critical follicle development stages was associated with lower AMH and antral follicle count (human clinical cohort) [58]. Independent retrospective analysis of frozen embryo transfers indicated that women in the highest quartile of PM2.5 exposure before oocyte retrieval had a 34% reduction in live birth odds, while PM10 exposure 2 weeks pre retrieval was associated with a 38% reduction (human IVF cohort) [59]. In adolescent patients experiencing rapid weight loss, elevated air pollution may attenuate some metabolic benefits. Similar suppressive effects on reproductive recovery in adults undergoing rapid weight reduction remain unknown and unstudied [6].
The impact of air pollution on ovarian reserve, as measured by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, was assessed. Exposure to PM1, PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 during early follicular development windows was associated with AMH reductions of up to 8.8% for each 10 μg/m3 increase (human observational cohort). Women from inland areas and those with low education appeared more vulnerable (human observational cohort). These results suggested that fine particulate matter and NO2 negatively affect ovarian reserve, especially during early folliculogenesis [60].
Increased exposure to PM2.5 and its specific chemical components, particularly ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3), and sulfate (SO42−), was associated with decreased anti-Müllerian hormone levels, indicating a diminished ovarian reserve (human observational study, confounders adjusted for age and BMI). The associations were more pronounced in women under 35 years of age, those living in urban areas, and during the cold season. These findings suggest that PM2.5 and its constituents negatively affected female reproductive potential (human observational evidence) [61].
A retrospective study analyzed 16,290 IVF cycles and found that ambient air pollutants were associated with lower live birth rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles, but not in fresh transfers (human clinical cohort). Women at the highest level of SO2 and O3 exposure had significantly reduced chances of live birth. These findings suggested that embryos in frozen embryo transfer cycles may be more sensitive to ambient air quality, and seasonal or regional fluctuations in success rates may be partly driven by variations in ambient pollution levels (human clinical evidence) [62].
In the 5354 women undergoing ART treatment in one study, exposure to PM1, PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and NO2 was associated with a lower number of antral follicles and a reduced likelihood of live birth (human clinical cohort, confounders considered). The analysis showed that the decrease in antral follicles partially explained the negative effect of pollutants, particularly NO2 and SO2. The results also suggested that air pollution may affect the success of fertility treatment by reducing ovarian reserve (human clinical cohort) [63].
In another study involving 194 women who underwent 486 embryo transfers, exposure to particulate matter showed trends toward higher miscarriage and lower clinical pregnancy rates, with significant risks particularly for PM exposure three days prior to transfer (human IVF clinical study). Subacute exposure may exacerbate these effects. Overall, particulate matter negatively affected IVF reproductive outcomes (human IVF clinical study) [35].

3.1.9. Synergy of Oxidative Stress and Micronutrient Deficiency

Rapid weight loss and associated nutrient deficiencies can compromise cellular antioxidant systems, including glutathione, catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase, leading to impaired DNA repair and increased oxidative vulnerability. Studies in individuals with obesity experiencing rapid adipose tissue reduction showed pre-existing low levels of superoxide dismutase and glutathione, along with elevated markers of lipid (8-isoprostanes) and protein oxidation (advanced oxidation protein products, AOPP); partial recovery may occur over time, but antioxidant capacity can remain attenuated, especially in those with prior metabolic dysfunction (human clinical observational studies, confounders considered) [32].
Environmental pollutants such as PFAS, PM2.5, and microplastics are associated with increased reactive oxygen species production. Mouse oocytes exposed in vitro to PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA exhibited significant increases in ROS levels, mitochondrial dysfunction, and chromosomal or spindle abnormalities (animal and in vitro mechanistic studies) [64]. Similarly, studies showed PM2.5 exposure prior to pregnancy leads to increased ROS production in oocytes and reduced litter size (in vitro animal studies) [65].
Collectively, these findings confirm that pollutant-induced oxidative stress is associated with disruption of oocyte structure and reproductive success. The potential synergy whereby oxidative insult from environmental pollutants overlays on a backdrop of reduced micronutrient-mediated antioxidant defense remains a hypothesis requiring prospective validation (mechanistic reasoning, human relevance implied) [66].

3.1.10. Postoperative PFAS Redistribution into Circulation

Longitudinal observations of plasma PFAS (including PFHxS and PFOS) during periods of rapid weight loss showed a transient increase or plateau in circulating levels during the first few months, followed by a gradual decline over subsequent months (human clinical cohort, metabolic intervention) [67].
These kinetics suggest a potential window during active adipose tissue catabolism when ovarian follicular fluid could be exposed to elevated PFAS concentrations, although no studies have yet directly measured follicular PFAS levels in women undergoing rapid weight loss.

3.1.11. Microplastics Induce Ovarian Oxidative Injury In Vivo

In a 2021 rat model, oral polystyrene microplastics caused granulosa cell apoptosis, ovarian fibrosis, and reduced AMH, mediated by oxidative stress activation, as evidenced through flow cytometry and histology—animal in vivo mechanistic study [68]. These findings demonstrate that environmental microplastics alone are associated with damage to ovarian structures; in humans, such effects remain speculative and require dedicated clinical confirmation.
Exposure to polystyrene microplastics in female rats for 90 days reduced growing ovarian follicles and antioxidant enzyme activities, while increasing oxidative stress markers. Elevated inflammation and cell death in ovarian granulosa cells occurred. These findings suggest that microplastics are associated with ovarian cell apoptosis, posing a potential risk for female infertility (animal in vivo mechanistic study) [69].
It was found that polystyrene microplastics accumulated in the ovaries of mice after 35 days of exposure, causing an increase in follicular atresia and granulosa cell apoptosis. Mitochondrial abnormalities, disrupted spindle integrity, increased ROS, and a lower number of oocytes per ovulatory cycle were observed. Exposed females showed reduced fertility. An in vitro follicular culture system was developed to assess reproductive toxicity. This study demonstrated that microplastics are associated with impaired ovarian function and highlights the mechanisms underlying female reproductive toxicity (animal in vivo and in vitro mechanistic studies) [70]. Although these in vivo rodent studies demonstrate potential ovarian toxicity, translation to human fertility should be interpreted cautiously (knowledge gap, human extrapolation), and further clinical studies are warranted.
Polystyrene microplastics negatively affected the female reproductive system, causing enlarged ovaries with fewer follicles, reduced follicle production, embryo retrieval, and decreased pregnancy rates in mice. They disrupted the balance of sex hormones and induced oxidative stress, affecting fertility. In addition, they affected ovarian reserve, oocyte maturation, and oocyte quality. In marine animals, they disrupted the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, reducing hatching rates and offspring size, causing transgenerational reproductive effects. This evidence highlighted the key mechanisms by which PS-MPs affect female reproduction, with clear distinctions between animal and marine species mechanistic studies (animal and marine mechanistic evidence) [71] (Figure 1).
Table 2. Evidence-map of environmental and metabolic factors affecting female fertility.
Table 2. Evidence-map of environmental and metabolic factors affecting female fertility.
ExposureOutcomeDirection of EffectDesign/NKey
Confounders
Certainty
ObesityInfertility, ovulatory dysfunction, ↓ ovarian reserveNegativeHuman cohorts (n > 500)Age, PCOS, lifestyleHighPractice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Obesity and reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1266–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Sep 25. PMID: 34583840 [18].
Bariatric surgery or Rapid weight loss↑ Ovulation, ↑ spontaneous conception, ↑ ART outcomes; transient toxicant exposurePositiveHuman clinical meta-analysis (n = 231–444)Age, BMI, nutritionHigh (fertility), Moderate (toxicant)Choromańska B, Myśliwiec P, Łuba M, Wojskowicz P, Dadan J, Myśliwiec H, Choromańska K, Zalewska A, Maciejczyk M. A Longitudinal Study of the Antioxidant Barrier and Oxidative Stress in Morbidly Obese Patients after Bariatric Surgery. Does the Metabolic Syndrome Affect the Redox Homeostasis of Obese People? J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 1;9(4):976. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040976. PMID: 32244612; PMCID: PMC7230760 [32].
PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFDA)↓ Fecundability, ↓ live birth, impaired oocyte qualityNegativeProspective and cross-sectional human cohortsAge, BMI, parity, lifestyle, metabolic statusModerate–HighRickard BP, Rizvi I, Fenton SE. Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and female reproductive outcomes: PFAS elimination, endocrine-mediated effects, and disease. Toxicology. 2022 Jan 15;465:153031. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.153031. Epub 2021 Nov 10. PMID: 34774661; PMCID: PMC8743032 [55].
Air pollutants (PM1, PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, O3)↓ AMH, ↓ AFC, ↓ ART successNegativeHuman IVF studies (n = 194–16,290)Age, BMI, geographyHighHuang K, Hu M, Zhang Z, Li Z, Hu C, Bai S, Li R, Wu LM, Zhang XJ, Xu B. Associations of ambient air pollutants with pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology and the mediating role of ovarian reserve: A longitudinal study in eastern China. Sci Total Environ. 2025 Jan 1;958:177919. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177919. Epub 2024 Dec 9. PMID: 39657336 [63].
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (BPA, phthalates, PFAS)↓ AMH, ↓ AFC, impaired oocyte qualityNegativeHuman clinical cohortsAge, BMI, lifestyleModerate–HighBjörvang RD, Damdimopoulou P. Persistent environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals in ovarian follicular fluid and in vitro fertilization treatment outcome in women. Ups J Med Sci. 2020 May;125(2):85–94. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1727073. Epub 2020 Feb 25. PMID: 32093529; PMCID: PMC7721012 [50].
Heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Hg)↓ Ovarian reserve, ↓ fertilizationNegativeHuman case–control and cohortsAge, BMI, occupation, smokingModerateGénard-Walton M, Warembourg C, Duros S, Ropert-Bouchet M, Lefebvre T, Guivarc’h-Levêque A, Le Martelot MT, Jacquemin B, Cordier S, Costet N, Multigner L, Garlantézec R. Heavy metals and diminished ovarian reserve: single-exposure and mixture analyses amongst women consulting in French fertility centers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Sep;47(3):103241. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 Jun 2. PMID: 37451971 [38].
MicroplasticsDetected in follicular fluid, impaired oocyte maturationNegativeHuman (n = 18), animal, in vitroAge, BMI, exposuresLow–Moderate (human), High (mechanistic)Jeong J, Thi Quynh Mai N, Moon BS, Choi JK. Impact of polystyrene microplastics (PS-MPs) on the entire female mouse reproductive cycle: Assessing reproductive toxicity of microplastics through in vitro follicle culture. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025 Jun 1;297:118228. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118228. Epub 2025 May 1. PMID: 40315747 [70].
Tobacco smoke↓ Ovarian reserve, ↑ miscarriage, impaired fertilityNegativeHuman, in vitro studiesAge, BMI, lifestyle, comorbiditiesHighLyngsø J, Kesmodel US, Bay B, Ingerslev HJ, Pisinger CH, Ramlau-Hansen CH. Female cigarette smoking and successful fertility treatment: A Danish cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jan;100(1):58–66. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13979. Epub 2020 Sep 18. PMID: 32865819 [43].
Rapid weight loss, micronutrient deficiencies↑ Oxidative stress in ovaries, mobilization of stored toxicantsNegativeHuman clinical and prospective (n = 51–67)Baseline BMI, micronutrients, lifestyleModerateBrown RH, Ng DK, Steele K, Schweitzer M, Groopman JD. Mobilization of Environmental Toxicants Following Bariatric Surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring).27(11):1865–1873. doi: 10.1002/oby.22618. PMID: 31689012 [51].

4. Discussion

Female infertility in the context of severe obesity is associated with a multifactorial interplay of hormonal dysregulation, chronic low-grade inflammation, and oxidative stress. Interventions that promote weight reduction and metabolic improvement may contribute to reversing obesity-associated reproductive dysfunction. By enhancing insulin sensitivity, normalizing gonadotropin secretion, and reducing systemic inflammation, such interventions are associated with improvements in spontaneous ovulation and conception rates. However, the physiological changes accompanying rapid metabolic improvement may create new vulnerabilities that remain insufficiently studied.
Rapid adipose tissue catabolism associated with significant weight loss may mobilize lipophilic environmental pollutants, potentially affecting ovarian physiology. High rates of micronutrient deficiencies, specifically in iron, folate, vitamin B12, zinc, and vitamin D, can compromise antioxidant defenses and DNA integrity, rendering ovarian tissue more susceptible to environmental oxidative insults.
Current evidence indicates that exposure to air pollution, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and microplastics is associated with diminished ovarian reserve, poor oocyte quality, impaired embryo development, and reduced success rates in assisted reproductive technologies. While these associations are consistently reported in human clinical cohorts, most mechanistic data come from animal or in vitro models and their direct translation to human reproductive outcomes should be interpreted cautiously. Although these effects are well documented in the general population, there remains a lack of clinical data specifically addressing how environmental exposures impact fertility outcomes in women undergoing rapid metabolic or nutritional changes.
In clinical practice, actionable recommendations based on human evidence include minimizing exposure to airborne pollutants through indoor air filtration and avoidance of high-pollution environments, reducing contact with plastic containers and packaging known to contain endocrine-disrupting chemicals (BPA, phthalates, and PFAS), encouraging cessation of active and passive tobacco exposure, ensuring adequate intake of micronutrients (iron, folate, vitamin B12, zinc, and vitamin D) through diet or supplementation, particularly in women undergoing rapid metabolic changes or post-bariatric surgery.
Future research could address this critical knowledge gap through dedicated prospective studies that integrate environmental exposure assessment, oxidative stress biomarker monitoring, and comprehensive reproductive evaluation in women undergoing significant metabolic or nutritional changes. Understanding these interactions is essential to developing preventive strategies, guiding preconception counseling, and optimizing fertility outcomes.
A rigorously designed prospective cohort study could enroll women experiencing rapid weight loss, with serial sampling at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months for plasma and follicular PFAS levels, oxidative biomarkers, micronutrient panels, and reproductive markers. This longitudinal design would allow for dynamic monitoring of pollutant redistribution following rapid adipose tissue loss, capturing critical windows during which elevated circulating toxicants may influence ovarian reserve, oocyte quality, and subsequent fertility outcomes. By correlating environmental pollutant burdens with oxidative stress markers and micronutrient deficiencies, this study would address a current evidence gap regarding mechanistic pathways linking rapid weight loss to altered reproductive function.
Moreover, integrating comprehensive reproductive markers such as antral follicle count, anti-Müllerian hormone levels and clinical pregnancy outcomes would provide robust endpoints to evaluate the clinical relevance of biochemical changes. This framework also offers an opportunity to validate whether findings from experimental models are reproducible in human populations, guiding personalized fertility counseling and interventions.
Nutritional assessments and supplementation strategies embedded within the cohort could further clarify how micronutrient status modulates vulnerability to pollutant toxicity, potentially identifying modifiable factors to improve reproductive prognosis. This approach aligns with precision medicine principles, enabling tailored management plans that address the combined impact of environmental exposures and metabolic changes post-bariatric surgery.
Beyond individual patient care, the data generated could inform broader public health targeting environmental pollutant regulation, especially concerning reproductive-age women and vulnerable populations. Ultimately, this comprehensive clinical framework aims to inform evidence-based guidelines and preventive strategies, mitigate the reproductive risks associated with pollutant exposure in the context of rapid adipose tissue loss.
In clinical practice, assessing environmental exposures can be integrated into fertility counseling by evaluating patients’ occupational and residential histories, lifestyle factors, and potential contact with endocrine-disrupting chemicals or air pollutants. This information, combined with standard reproductive evaluations, can guide personalized recommendations for minimizing risks, optimizing timing of conception, and planning targeted nutritional or antioxidant interventions.
Nutritional assessment and appropriate supplementation remain key components of mitigating environmental risks. Ensuring adequate intake of micronutrients such as iron, folate, vitamin B12, zinc, and vitamin D supports antioxidant defenses and oocyte quality, particularly in women undergoing rapid metabolic changes or post-bariatric surgery. Incorporating these strategies into preconception care may enhance resilience against pollutant-induced oxidative stress.
Taken together, these considerations highlight the importance of a precision medicine approach, where reproductive counseling is tailored to the individual’s metabolic status, environmental exposures, and nutritional profile. Such an approach enables clinicians to provide actionable, evidence-informed guidance that addresses both the physiological and environmental determinants of fertility outcomes.

5. Conclusions

Air pollution (PM2.5, NO2, and O3): Human epidemiological studies consistently associate higher exposure with lower ovarian reserve (AMH and AFC) and reduced live birth rates in ART (human observational studies). Mechanistic evidence from in vitro and animal models supports oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction as potential underlying pathways (animal, in vitro mechanistic studies).
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (BPA, phthalates, PFAS, and PCBs): Human cohort and IVF studies show associations with diminished ovarian reserve, impaired oocyte quality, and reduced fecundability (human observational IVF studies). Animal and in vitro studies provide mechanistic plausibility through steroidogenesis disruption and hormonal interference (animal/in vitro mechanistic studies).
Heavy metals (cadmium, lead, and mercury): Human observational studies report negative impacts on follicular development and fertilization outcomes, while in vitro and animal studies highlight oxidative stress and endocrine disruption as mechanisms.
Microplastics: Emerging human data detect microplastics in follicular fluid, suggesting potential reproductive risks (human observational study). Animal and in vitro studies indicate impaired oocyte maturation and oxidative injury, providing mechanistic support. Further human studies are needed to confirm clinical relevance.
Metabolic status and rapid weight loss: Rapid weight reduction and bariatric surgery are associated with improved ovulatory function and fertility outcomes (human clinical studies) but may transiently increase susceptibility to environmental toxicants due to mobilization of lipophilic compounds and micronutrient deficiencies (hypothesis based on mechanistic reasoning and observational data). Nutritional optimization is crucial to support antioxidant defenses and mitigate potential oxidative damage (human clinical guidance).
Overall, environmental exposures and metabolic status interact to influence female fertility, with the strongest human evidence for air pollution and PFAS, as well as emerging but biologically plausible concerns for microplastics. Clinical strategies should consider both reducing exposure and optimizing metabolic and nutritional status to support reproductive outcomes (evidence-informed recommendation).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: L.P., R.M.S. and C.-D.P.; methodology: R.M.S. and M.-O.P.; software: C.-D.P.; validation: L.P., R.M.S. and C.-D.P.; formal analysis: L.P.; investigation: C.-D.P. and A.-A.C.; resources: C.-D.P.; data curation: R.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation: C.-D.P.; writing—review and editing: C.-D.P.; visualization: C.-D.P., G.-P.G., A.-S.D., M.M. and C.-V.T.; supervision: L.P.; project administration: R.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

The Informed Consent Statement is waived for this review article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Publication of this paper was supported by the University of Medicine Pharmacy Carol Davila, through the institutional program Publish not Perish.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AMHAnti-Müllerian Hormone
AFCAntral Follicle Count
ARTAssisted Reproductive Technology
BPABisphenol A
EDCEndocrine-Disrupting Chemical
PFASPer- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
PCBsPolychlorinated Biphenyls
PMParticulate Matter
PM1/PM2.5/PM10Particulate Matter ≤ 1 μm/≤2.5 μm/≤10 μm
NO2Nitrogen Dioxide
O3Ozone
PFDAPerfluorodecanoic Acid
PFNAPerfluorononanoic Acid
PFOAPerfluorooctanoic Acid
PFOSPerfluorooctanesulfonic Acid
PFHxSPerfluorohexanesulfonic Acid
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
GLP-1Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
SHBGSex Hormone-Binding Globulin
GnRHGonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
FSHFollicle-Stimulating Hormone
LHLuteinizing Hormone
PCOSPolycystic Ovary Syndrome
IVFIn Vitro Fertilization
AOPPAdvanced Oxidation Protein Products
PMCPubMed Central

References

  1. Almutairi, H.; Aldhalea, M.S.; Almaaz, M.A.; Aljuhani, S.A.; Aloraini, R.I.; Alamoudi, A.A.; Alkhalifah, W.F.; Alrushaid, L.A.; Alanzy, H.W.; Alzuwayyid, M.; et al. The Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery on Treating Infertility in Women-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Nilsson-Condori, E.; Mattsson, K.; Thurin-Kjellberg, A.; Hedenbro, J.L.; Friberg, B. Outcomes of in-vitro fertilization after bariatric surgery: A national register-based case-control study. Hum. Reprod. 2022, 37, 2474–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. Montano, L.; Raimondo, S.; Piscopo, M.; Ricciardi, M.; Guglielmino, A.; Chamayou, S.; Gentile, R.; Gentile, M.; Rapisarda, P.; Oliveri Conti, G.; et al. First evidence of microplastics in human ovarian follicular fluid: An emerging threat to female fertility. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 291, 117868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Samarasinghe, S.N.S.; Leca, B.; Alabdulkader, S.; Dimitriadis, G.K.; Davasgaium, A.; Thadani, P.; Parry, K.; Luli, M.; O’Donnell, K.; Johnson, B.; et al. Bariatric surgery for spontaneous ovulation in women living with polycystic ovary syndrome: The BAMBINI multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2024, 403, 2489–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhu, X.; Kan, H. Very Early Pregnancy Loss: The Role of PM2.5 Exposure in IVF-ET Outcomes. Environ. Health 2024, 2, 854–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  6. Li, F.; Duan, X.; Li, M.; Gao, Y.; Kang, Y.; Zheng, W.; Guo, X.; Chen, Y. Environmental pollution and human fertility: Investigating the relationship between PM2.5 exposure and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. BMC Public Health 2025, 25, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Pasquali, R.; Pelusi, C.; Genghini, S.; Cacciari, M.; Gambineri, A. Obesity and reproductive disorders in women. Hum. Reprod. Update 2003, 9, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, J.; Bao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, L. Polycystic ovary syndrome and mitochondrial dysfunction. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2019, 17, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Robker, R.L. Evidence that obesity alters the quality of oocytes and embryos. Pathophysiology 2008, 15, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pourghazi, F.; Eslami, M.; Mohammadi, S.; Ghoreshi, R.; Ejtahed, H.S.; Qorbani, M. Association between childhood obesity and infertility in later life: A systematic review of cohort studies. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2023, 23, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Merhi, Z.; Bazzi, A.A.; Bonney, E.A.; Buyuk, E. Role of adiponectin in ovarian follicular development and ovarian reserve. Biomed. Rep. 2019, 10, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  12. Sasaki, H.; Hamatani, T.; Kamijo, S.; Iwai, M.; Kobanawa, M.; Ogawa, S.; Miyado, K.; Tanaka, M. Impact of Oxidative Stress on Age-Associated Decline in Oocyte Developmental Competence. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Cena, H.; Chiovato, L.; Nappi, R.E. Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility: A New Avenue for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, e2695–e2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  14. Schneider, E.; Hamer, O.; Smith, C.; Hill, J. Weight loss interventions for improving fertility: A synthesis of current evidence. Pract. Midwife 2024, 27, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Lu, F.F.; Wang, Z.; Yang, Q.Q.; Yan, F.S.; Xu, C.; Wang, M.T.; Xu, Z.J.; Cai, S.Y.; Guan, R. Investigating the metabolomic pathways in female reproductive endocrine disorders: A Mendelian randomization study. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1438079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  16. Marinelli, S.; Napoletano, G.; Straccamore, M.; Basile, G. Female obesity and infertility: Outcomes and regulatory guidance. Acta Biomed. 2022, 93, e2022278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  17. Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, W.; Liu, H.; Chen, J.; Chen, J. Association between bedtime and female infertility: A secondary analysis from a cross-sectional study. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1340131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  18. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: Asrm@asrm.org; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Obesity and reproduction: A committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2021, 116, 1266–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Butterworth, J.; Deguara, J.; Borg, C.M. Bariatric Surgery, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility. J. Obes. 2016, 2016, 1871594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Makhsosi, B.R.; Ghobadi, P.; Otaghi, M.; Tardeh, Z. Impact of bariatric surgery on infertility in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Med. Surg. 2024, 86, 7042–7048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Herrera-Martínez, A.D.; Junquera-Bañares, S.; Turrión-Merino, L.; Arrieta-Blanco, F.; Botella-Carretero, J.; Vázquez-Martínez, C.; Calañas-Continente, A. Case Report: Extensive Dermatitis Secondary to Severe Malnutrition, Zinc and Vitamin Deficiencies After Malabsorptive Bariatric Surgery. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 623543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  22. ACOG Committee. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 804: Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: Correction. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 138, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Grzegorczyk-Martin, V.; Fréour, T.; De Bantel Finet, A.; Bonnet, E.; Merzouk, M.; Roset, J.; Roger, V.; Cédrin-Durnerin, I.; Wainer, R.; Avril, C.; et al. IVF outcomes in patients with a history of bariatric surgery: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 35, 2755–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Alibhai, K.M.; Churchill, I.F.; Vause, T.; Lochnan, H.A. The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2022, 44, 915–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. İlyas Öner, R.; Özdaş, S.; Sarıaydın, M.; Aslan, S. The impact of bariatric surgery on obesity-related infertility. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2023, 27, 2865–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liang, M.; Wu, X.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Y.; Luo, B.; Xue, H.; Li, Z. The relationship between dietary inflammation potential, dietary oxidative balance score, and female reproductive function: A mediation analysis of obesity indicators. Front. Endocrinol. 2025, 16, 1517318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. Kamal, F.A.; Fernet, L.Y.; Rodriguez, M.; Kamal, F.; Da Silva, N.K.; Kamal, O.A.; Ayala Aguilar, A.; Arruarana, V.S.; Martinez Ramirez, M. Nutritional Deficiencies Before and After Bariatric Surgery in Low- and High-Income Countries: Prevention and Treatment. Cureus 2024, 16, e55062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Mechanick, J.I.; Apovian, C.; Brethauer, S.; Garvey, W.T.; Joffe, A.M.; Kim, J.; Kushner, R.F.; Lindquist, R.; Pessah-Pollack, R.; Seger, J.; et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures—2019 update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2020, 16, 175–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pg Baharuddin, D.M.; Payus, A.O.; Abdel Malek Fahmy, E.H.; Sawatan, W.; Than, W.W.; Abdelhafez, M.M.; Oo Leik, N.K.; Ag Daud, D.M.; Mohd Daud, M.N.; Ahmad, Z.N.S. Bariatric surgery and its impact on fertility, pregnancy and its outcome: A narrative review. Ann. Med. Surg. 2021, 72, 103038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  30. Voros, C.; Varthaliti, A.; Bananis, K.; Mavrogianni, D.; Athanasiou, D.; Athanasiou, A.; Athanasiou, A.; Papahliou, A.M.; Zografos, C.G.; Kondili, P.; et al. The Relationship Between Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, and Infertility: A Systematic Review. Life 2025, 15, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  31. Nori, W.; Akram, W.; Amer Ali, E. Fertility outcomes following bariatric surgery. World J. Exp. Med. 2023, 13, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Choromańska, B.; Myśliwiec, P.; Łuba, M.; Wojskowicz, P.; Dadan, J.; Myśliwiec, H.; Choromańska, K.; Zalewska, A.; Maciejczyk, M. A Longitudinal Study of the Antioxidant Barrier and Oxidative Stress in Morbidly Obese Patients After Bariatric Surgery. Does the Metabolic Syndrome Affect the Redox Homeostasis of Obese People? J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  33. Berardi, G.; Vitiello, A.; Abu-Abeid, A.; Schiavone, V.; Franzese, A.; Velotti, N.; Musella, M. Micronutrients Deficiencies in Candidates of Bariatric Surgery: Results from a Single Institution over a 1-Year Period. Obes. Surg. 2023, 33, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  34. Jain, M.; Carlson, K.; Singh, M. Environmental Toxins and Infertility. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. González-Comadran, M.; Jacquemin, B.; Cirach, M.; Lafuente, R.; Cole-Hunter, T.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.; Brassesco, M.; Coroleu, B.; Checa, M.A. The effect of short term exposure to outdoor air pollution on fertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  36. Mínguez-Alarcón, L.; Messerlian, C.; Bellavia, A.; Gaskins, A.J.; Chiu, Y.H.; Ford, J.B.; Azevedo, A.R.; Petrozza, J.C.; Calafat, A.M.; Hauser, R.; et al. Urinary concentrations of bisphenol A, parabens and phthalate metabolite mixtures in relation to reproductive success among women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  37. Clark, K.L.; George, J.W.; Davis, J.S. Adolescent exposure to a mixture of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) depletes the ovarian reserve, increases ovarian fibrosis, and alters the Hippo pathway in adult female mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2024, 202, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  38. Génard-Walton, M.; Warembourg, C.; Duros, S.; Ropert-Bouchet, M.; Lefebvre, T.; Guivarc’h-Levêque, A.; Le Martelot, M.T.; Jacquemin, B.; Cordier, S.; Costet, N.; et al. Heavy metals and diminished ovarian reserve: Single-exposure and mixture analyses amongst women consulting in French fertility centres. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2023, 47, 103241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, Z.; Zhuan, Q.; Zhang, L.; Meng, L.; Fu, X.; Hou, Y. Polystyrene microplastics induced female reproductive toxicity in mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dhage, V.D.; Nagtode, N.; Kumar, D.; Bhagat, A.K. A Narrative Review on the Impact of Smoking on Female Fertility. Cureus 2024, 16, e58389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  41. Oladipupo, I.; Ali, T.; Hein, D.W.; Pagidas, K.; Bohler, H.; Doll, M.A.; Mann, M.L.; Gentry, A.; Chiang, J.L.; Pierson, R.C.; et al. Association between cigarette smoking and ovarian reserve among women seeking fertility care. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0278998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  42. Mueller, L.; Ciervo, C.A. Smoking in women. J. Osteopath. Med. 2023, 98, s7–s10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lyngsø, J.; Kesmodel, U.S.; Bay, B.; Ingerslev, H.J.; Pisinger, C.H.; Ramlau-Hansen, C.H. Female cigarette smoking and successful fertility treatment: A Danish cohort study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2021, 100, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Montjean, D.; Godin Pagé, M.H.; Bélanger, M.C.; Benkhalifa, M.; Miron, P. An Overview of E-Cigarette Impact on Reproductive Health. Life 2023, 13, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  45. Zurub, R.E.; Cariaco, Y.; Wade, M.G.; Bainbridge, S.A. Microplastics exposure: Implications for human fertility, pregnancy and child health. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 14, 1330396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  46. Balali, H.; Morabbi, A.; Karimian, M. Concerning influences of micro/nano plastics on female reproductive health: Focusing on cellular and molecular pathways from animal models to human studies. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2024, 22, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  47. Ferraboschi, I.; Canzolino, F.; Ferrari, E.; Sissa, C.; Masino, M.; Rizzi, M.; Bussolati, S.; Basini, G.; Bertini, S.; Grolli, S.; et al. Detection of microplastics in the feline placenta and fetus. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0320694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  48. Wang, Q.; Chi, F.; Liu, Y.; Chang, Q.; Chen, S.; Kong, P.; Yang, W.; Liu, W.; Teng, X.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Polyethylene microplastic exposure adversely affects oocyte quality in human and mouse. Environ. Int. 2025, 195, 109236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ni, D.; Yu, K.; Yan, N.; Chen, X.; Xie, Q.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ling, X. Characterization of microplastics in human follicular fluid and assessment of their potential impact on mouse oocyte maturation in vitro. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 291, 117796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Björvang, R.D.; Damdimopoulou, P. Persistent environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals in ovarian follicular fluid and in vitro fertilization treatment outcome in women. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 125, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  51. Brown, R.H.; Ng, D.K.; Steele, K.; Schweitzer, M.; Groopman, J.D. Mobilization of Environmental Toxicants Following Bariatric Surgery. Obesity 2019, 27, 1865–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Snoek, K.M.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.M.; Hazebroek, E.J.; Willemsen, S.P.; Galjaard, S.; Laven, J.S.E.; Schoenmakers, S. The effects of bariatric surgery on periconception maternal health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2021, 27, 1030–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  53. Soykan, Y.; Bayhan, H.; Akogul, S.; Bedirli, A. The Influence of Bariatric Surgery on Reproductive Hormones and Ovarian Morphology and Clinical Findings in Women: A Prospective Study. Obes. Surg. 2025. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cohen, N.J.; Yao, M.; Midya, V.; India-Aldana, S.; Mouzica, T.; Andra, S.S.; Narasimhan, S.; Meher, A.K.; Arora, M.; Chan, J.K.Y.; et al. Exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and women’s fertility outcomes in a Singaporean population-based preconception cohort. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 873, 162267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  55. Rickard, B.P.; Rizvi, I.; Fenton, S.E. Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and female reproductive outcomes: PFAS elimination, endocrine-mediated effects, and disease. Toxicology 2022, 465, 153031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  56. Lockington, C.; Favetta, L.A. How Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances Affect Gamete Viability and Fertilization Capability: Insights from the Literature. J. Xenobiotics 2024, 14, 651–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  57. Huang, G.; Li, J.; Zhou, L.; Duan, T.; Deng, L.; Yang, P.; Gong, Y. Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Relation to the Participant-Reported Total Pregnancy and Live Birth Numbers Among Reproductive-Aged Women in the United States. Toxics 2024, 12, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  58. Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Yan, H.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, H.; Yang, X. Association of exposure to ozone and fine particulate matter with ovarian reserve among women with infertility. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 340 Pt 1, 122845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Leathersich, S.J.; Roche, C.S.; Walls, M.; Nathan, E.; Hart, R.J. Particulate air pollution at the time of oocyte retrieval is independently associated with reduced odds of live birth in subsequent frozen embryo transfers. Hum. Reprod. 2025, 40, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pang, L.; Yu, W.; Lv, J.; Dou, Y.; Zhao, H.; Li, S.; Guo, Y.; Chen, G.; Cui, L.; Hu, J.; et al. Air pollution exposure and ovarian reserve impairment in Shandong province, China: The effects of particulate matter size and exposure window. Environ. Res. 2023, 218, 115056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Liu, S.; Zhao, J.; Ye, X.; Fu, M.; Zhang, K.; Wang, H.; Zou, Y.; Yu, K. Fine particulate matter and its constituent on ovarian reserve: Identifying susceptible windows of exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 904, 166744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, X.; Cai, J.; Liu, L.; Jiang, X.; Li, P.; Sha, A.; Ren, J. Association between outdoor air pollution during in vitro culture and the outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huang, K.; Hu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Z.; Hu, C.; Bai, S.; Li, R.; Wu, L.M.; Zhang, X.J.; Xu, B. Associations of ambient air pollutants with pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology and the mediating role of ovarian reserve: A longitudinal study in eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 958, 177919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Feng, J.; Soto-Moreno, E.J.; Prakash, A.; Balboula, A.Z.; Qiao, H. Adverse PFAS effects on mouse oocyte in vitro maturation are associated with carbon-chain length and inclusion of a sulfonate group. Cell Prolif. 2023, 56, e13353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  65. Li, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, C.; Fu, H.; Yu, S.; Zhou, M.; Guo, J.; Fang, Z.; Li, A.; Zhao, M.; et al. PM2.5 leads to adverse pregnancy outcomes by inducing trophoblast oxidative stress and mitochondrial apoptosis via KLF9/CYP1A1 transcriptional axis. Elife 2023, 12, e85944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  66. Taibl, K.R.; Schantz, S.; Aung, M.T.; Padula, A.; Geiger, S.; Smith, S.; Park, J.S.; Milne, G.L.; Robinson, J.F.; Woodruff, T.J.; et al. Associations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their mixture with oxidative stress biomarkers during pregnancy. Environ. Int. 2022, 169, 107541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  67. Baumert, B.O.; Eckel, S.P.; Goodrich, J.A.; Li, Z.; Stratakis, N.; Walker, D.I.; Zhao, Y.; Fischer, F.C.; Bartell, S.; Valvi, D.; et al. Changes in plasma concentrations of per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances after bariatric surgery in adolescents from the Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (Teen-LABS) study. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 930, 172840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  68. An, R.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, N.; Xu, F.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L. Polystyrene microplastics cause granulosa cells apoptosis and fibrosis in ovary through oxidative stress in rats. Toxicology 2021, 449, 152665, Erratum in Toxicology 2022, 478, 153291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hou, J.; Lei, Z.; Cui, L.; Hou, Y.; Yang, L.; An, R.; Wang, Q.; Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L. Polystyrene microplastics lead to pyroptosis and apoptosis of ovarian granulosa cells via NLRP3/Caspase-1 signaling pathway in rats. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 212, 112012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Jeong, J.; Thi Quynh Mai, N.; Moon, B.S.; Choi, J.K. Impact of polystyrene microplastics (PS-MPs) on the entire female mouse reproductive cycle: Assessing reproductive toxicity of microplastics through in vitro follicle culture. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 297, 118228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Afreen, V.; Hashmi, K.; Nasir, R.; Saleem, A.; Khan, M.I.; Akhtar, M.F. Adverse health effects and mechanisms of microplastics on female reproductive system: A descriptive review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 76283–76296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Mechanistic pathways linking environmental exposure to reproductive outcomes. Environmental toxicants induce oxidative stress, which subsequently disrupts endocrine signaling and leads to epigenetic alterations, ultimately impairing female reproductive function. Evidence: human studies, animal studies, in vitro studies.
Figure 1. Mechanistic pathways linking environmental exposure to reproductive outcomes. Environmental toxicants induce oxidative stress, which subsequently disrupts endocrine signaling and leads to epigenetic alterations, ultimately impairing female reproductive function. Evidence: human studies, animal studies, in vitro studies.
Reprodmed 06 00037 g001
Table 1. (a) Pathophysiological mechanisms linking obesity to female infertility. (b) Restorative effects after bariatric surgery or rapid weight loss.
Table 1. (a) Pathophysiological mechanisms linking obesity to female infertility. (b) Restorative effects after bariatric surgery or rapid weight loss.
(a)
Pathophysiological
Mechanism
Impact in Obese WomenReference
Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Ovarian AxisDisrupted GnRH pulsatility, altered LH/FSH secretionPractice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Obesity and reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1266–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Sep 25. PMID: 34583840 [18].
Hyperinsulinemia and Insulin ResistanceIncreased ovarian androgens, decreased SHBG, hyperandrogenismCena H, Chiovato L, Nappi RE. Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility: A New Avenue for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Aug 1;105(8):e2695–709. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa285. PMID: 32442310; PMCID: PMC7457958 [13].
Adipokine imbalanceElevated leptin resistance, low adiponectin → impaired folliculogenesis and oocyte qualityMerhi Z, Bazzi AA, Bonney EA, Buyuk E. Role of adiponectin in ovarian follicular development and ovarian reserve. 1(1):1–5. doi: 10.3892/br.2019.1213. PMID: 31258901; PMCID: PMC6566571 [11].
Oxidative stress and inflammationMitochondrial dysfunction, ROS accumulation → granulosa cell apoptosis, poor oocyte qualitySasaki H, Hamatani T, Kamijo S, Iwai M, Kobanawa M, Ogawa S, Miyado K, Tanaka M. Impact of Oxidative Stress on Age-Associated Decline in Oocyte Developmental Competence. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00811. PMID: 31824426; PMCID: PMC6882737 [12].
Anovulation and menstrual irregularityChronic anovulation, PCOS-like symptomsCena H, Chiovato L, Nappi RE. Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility: A New Avenue for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Aug 1;105(8):e2695–709. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa285. PMID: 32442310; PMCID: PMC7457958 [13].
Altered hormone profilesLower AMH, altered kisspeptin, estrogen/progesterone imbalanceLu FF, Wang Z, Yang QQ, Yan FS, Xu C, Wang MT, Xu ZJ, Cai SY, Guan R. Investigating the metabolomic pathways in female reproductive endocrine disorders: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 31;15:1438079. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1438079. PMID: 39544240; PMCID: PMC11560792 [15].
Impaired ART outcomesLower oocyte yield, poor embryo quality, reduced implantation and live birth ratesNilsson-Condori E, Mattsson K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Hedenbro JL, Friberg B. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization after bariatric surgery: a national register-based case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2474–2481. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac164. PMID: 35904469; PMCID: PMC9527453 [2].
Endometrial dysfunctionImpaired receptivity due to inflammation and leptin signalingBLu FF, Wang Z et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1438079. PMID: 39544240ellver J et al., Fertil Steril. 2021;115(6):1453–1463. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.003 [15]
Pregnancy outcomesIncreased risk of infertility, miscarriage, preeclampsia, cesarean deliveryAlmutairi H, Aldhalea MS, Almaaz MA, Aljuhani SA, Aloraini RI, Alamoudi AA, Alkhalifah WF, Alrushaid LA, Alanzy HW, Alzuwayyid M, Alrumaih FA, Al-Harbi MM, Al-Aboudi AA, Alqadi FS, Alshammari RS. The Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery on Treating Infertility in Women-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5569. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185569. PMID: 39337056; PMCID: PMC11433424 [1].
(b)
Pathophysiological
Mechanism
Effect After Bariatric Surgery or Rapid Weight LossReference
Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Ovarian axisRestoration of GnRH pulsatility and hormonal balance; resumption of ovulatory cyclesSamarasinghe SNS, Leca B, Alabdulkader S, Dimitriadis GK, Davasgaium A, Thadani P, Parry K, Luli M, O’Donnell K, Johnson B, Abbara A, Seyfried F, Morman R, Ahmed AR, Hakky S, Tsironis C, Purkayastha S, le Roux CW, Franks S, Menon V, Randeva H, Miras AD. Bariatric surgery for spontaneous ovulation in women living with polycystic ovary syndrome: the BAMBINI multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2024 Jun 8;403(10443):2489–2503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00538-5. Epub 2024 May 20. PMID: 38782004 [4].
Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistanceImproved insulin sensitivity, decreased androgen excess, normalized SHBGCena H, Chiovato L, Nappi RE. Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility: A New Avenue for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Aug 1;105(8):e2695–709. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa285. PMID: 32442310; PMCID: PMC7457958 [13].
Adipokine imbalanceDecreased leptin levels, increased adiponectin → improved folliculogenesisMerhi Z, Bazzi AA, Bonney EA, Buyuk E. Role of adiponectin in ovarian follicular development and ovarian reserve. Biomed Rep. 1(1):1–5. PMID: 31258901 [11]
Oxidative stress and inflammationReduced systemic inflammation and oxidative stress → improved oocyte quality and endometrial receptivityChoromańska B, Myśliwiec P, Łuba M, Wojskowicz P, Dadan J, Myśliwiec H, Choromańska K, Zalewska A, Maciejczyk M. A Longitudinal Study of the Antioxidant Barrier and Oxidative Stress in Morbidly Obese Patients after Bariatric Surgery. Does the Metabolic Syndrome Affect the Redox Homeostasis of Obese People? J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 1;9(4):976. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040976. PMID: 32244612; PMCID: PMC7230760 [32].
Anovulation and menstrual irregularityRegularized menstrual cycles and restored spontaneous ovulationSamarasinghe SNS et al. Lancet. 2024;403(10443):2489–2503. PMID: 38782004 [4]
Altered hormone profilesImproved AMH levels and hormonal regulationLu FF, Wang Z, Yang QQ, Yan FS, Xu C, Wang MT, Xu ZJ, Cai SY, Guan R. Investigating the metabolomic pathways in female reproductive endocrine disorders: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 31;15:1438079. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1438079. PMID: 39544240; PMCID: PMC11560792 [15].
ART outcomesEnhanced ART success rates comparable to BMI-matched controlsNilsson-Condori E, Mattsson K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Hedenbro JL, Friberg B. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization after bariatric surgery: a national register-based case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2474–2481. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac164. PMID: 35904469; PMCID: PMC9527453 [2].
Endometrial functionImproved receptivity; enhanced embryo implantationLu FF, Wang Z et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1438079. PMID: 39544240 [15]
Micronutrient statusRisk of iron, B12, folate, zinc, vitamin D deficiencies → requires close follow-upBerardi G, Vitiello A, Abu-Abeid A, Schiavone V, Franzese A, Velotti N, Musella M. Micronutrients Deficiencies in Candidates of Bariatric Surgery: Results from a Single Institution over a 1-Year Period. Obes Surg. 2023 Jan;33(1):212–218. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06355-8. Epub 2022 Nov 4. PMID: 36331725; PMCID: PMC9834098 [33].
Pregnancy outcomesLower preeclampsia rates post-surgery; small-for-gestational-age risk if conception occurs too earlyAlmutairi H et al. The Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery on Treating Infertility in Women. J Clin Med. 2024;13(18):5569. PMID: 39337056 [1]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Popescu, C.-D.; Sima, R.M.; Poenaru, M.-O.; Constantin, A.-A.; Gorecki, G.-P.; Diaconescu, A.-S.; Mihai, M.; Toma, C.-V.; Pleș, L. Environmental Pollution, Endocrine Disruptors, and Metabolic Status: Impact on Female Fertility—A Narrative Review. Reprod. Med. 2025, 6, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040037

AMA Style

Popescu C-D, Sima RM, Poenaru M-O, Constantin A-A, Gorecki G-P, Diaconescu A-S, Mihai M, Toma C-V, Pleș L. Environmental Pollution, Endocrine Disruptors, and Metabolic Status: Impact on Female Fertility—A Narrative Review. Reproductive Medicine. 2025; 6(4):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Popescu, Cristina-Diana, Romina Marina Sima, Mircea-Octavian Poenaru, Ancuta-Alina Constantin, Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Andrei-Sebastian Diaconescu, Mara Mihai, Cristian-Valentin Toma, and Liana Pleș. 2025. "Environmental Pollution, Endocrine Disruptors, and Metabolic Status: Impact on Female Fertility—A Narrative Review" Reproductive Medicine 6, no. 4: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040037

APA Style

Popescu, C.-D., Sima, R. M., Poenaru, M.-O., Constantin, A.-A., Gorecki, G.-P., Diaconescu, A.-S., Mihai, M., Toma, C.-V., & Pleș, L. (2025). Environmental Pollution, Endocrine Disruptors, and Metabolic Status: Impact on Female Fertility—A Narrative Review. Reproductive Medicine, 6(4), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop