Next Article in Journal
LC-ESI-MS and GC-MS Profiling, Chemical Composition, and Cytotoxic Activity of Endophytic Fungus Pleosporales sp. Derived from Artemisia annua
Previous Article in Journal
Solvent-Mediated Rate Deceleration of Diels–Alder Reactions for Enhanced Selectivity: Quantum Mechanical Insights
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Understanding the Enhanced Separation Mechanism of C2H4/C2H6 at Low Pressure by HKUST−1

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China
2
School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering and Environmental Engineering, Weifang University, Weifang 261061, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
4
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemistry 2024, 6(6), 1326-1335; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry6060077
Submission received: 25 September 2024 / Revised: 21 October 2024 / Accepted: 23 October 2024 / Published: 25 October 2024

Abstract

:
The production of ethylene (C2H4) is typically accompanied by the formation of impurities like ethane (C2H6), making the separation of C2H4 and C2H6 crucial in industrial processes. Here, we investigated the S-shaped adsorption phenomenon of C2H6 on the metal–organic framework HKUST−1. The virial equation is used to fit the C2H6 and C2H4 adsorption isotherms under low coverage. The results showed that the repulsion energy between neighboring C2H6 molecules was significantly higher than that between neighboring C2H4 molecules, which was an important reason for the lower adsorption of C2H6 by HKUST−1 at low coverage. As more molecules are adsorbed, gas molecules aggregate within pores, leading to more hydrogen bonds formed between HKUST−1 and larger-sized C2H6 under high coverage conditions. This phenomenon plays a crucial role in the S-shaped adsorption behavior of HKUST−1 on C2H6. Additionally, this unique adsorption behavior allows for the efficient separation of C2H4/C2H6 mixtures at low pressures. The ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) selectivity of HKUST−1 for C2H4/C2H6 mixtures was 3.78 at 283 K and 1 bar, but increased significantly to 7.53 under low pressure. This unique mechanism provides a theoretical basis for the low-pressure separation of C2H4/C2H6 by HKUST−1 and establishes a solid foundation for future practical research applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ethylene (C2H4) is a crucial fundamental feedstock in the organic chemical industry, with an extensive array of downstream derivatives encompassing polyvinyl chloride, synthetic rubber, and other products [1,2]. Within the petrochemical industry, C2H4 is predominantly obtained through thermal cracking of ethane (C2H6), inevitably resulting in the presence of C2H6 impurities in the crude products. Currently, cryogenic distillation is the primary purification process for separating C2H4 from C2H4/C2H6 mixtures [3]. The cryogenic distillation process, however, is characterized by its high energy consumption and operation under harsh conditions, which imposes significant demands on equipment [4]. Therefore, it is imperative to explore a more cost- and energy-efficient approach for separating C2H4/C2H6 mixtures. In comparison, adsorption separation utilizing porous materials as physisorptive agents represents a highly efficient technology for achieving this goal [5,6,7,8,9].
Recently, numerous studies have documented the utilization of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) in hydrocarbon separation, owing to their customizable structure and porosity, as well as their inherent porous nature [10,11,12]. The coordination bonds between organic linkers and metal ions/clusters give rise to the formation of MOFs, which represent a novel class of adsorbent materials. MOFs exhibit diverse functionalities, as well as highly adjustable pore structures and chemical properties, owing to the facile regulation or substitution of both metal ions/clusters and ligands. Among these, polymeric copper (II) benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (HKUST−1), characterized by its exceptionally low mass density and extensive surface area, exhibits remarkable advantages as an adsorbent for gas adsorption [13] and separation [14,15]. HKUST−1 represents a pioneering MOF material employed for the separation of C2H4/C2H6. The adsorption isotherms for C2H6 and C2H4 on HKUST−1 at 295 K were investigated by Semanscin et al. in 2002. The results revealed a lower adsorption capacity of C2H6 compared to C2H4, particularly within the low-pressure range [16]. The interactions between C2H4 and C2H6 with HKUST−1 were investigated by Bhatia et al. through theoretical calculations, revealing that electrostatic interactions can induce selective adsorption of light hydrocarbons under low pressures [17]. Typically, MOFs that exhibit S-shaped adsorption profiles are usually flexible MOFs, with framework flexibility dependent on the structure of the MOFs and/or external stimuli [18,19,20]. Despite over two decades of extensive research on the highly crystalline material HKUST−1 [21,22,23], the mechanism behind the S-shaped adsorption phenomenon in HKUST−1 and its superior separation efficiency for C2H4/C2H6 at low pressures compared to high pressures remains unclear.
In order to investigate the underlying cause of the S-shaped adsorption phenomenon exhibited by HKUST−1 towards C2H6 and more efficient separation of C2H4/C2H6 under low-pressure conditions, we experimentally conducted measurements of the adsorption isotherms of C2H6 and C2H4 on HKUST−1, respectively, and accurately calculated the enthalpy of adsorption (Qst) for C2H6 and C2H4 using both the virial equation and Clausius–Clapeyron equation. Under conditions of low coverage, there is a higher intermolecular repulsion between neighboring C2H6 molecules compared to neighboring C2H4 molecules, resulting in a lower adsorption capacity for C2H6 on HKUST−1 under low-pressure conditions. At high coverage, gas molecules aggregate within the pores, and C2H6 molecules with larger sizes can form more hydrogen bonds to the O atoms in HKUST−1, thereby increasing the adsorption capacity of C2H6. This elucidates the underlying reason for the S-shaped adsorption phenomenon exhibited by HKUST−1 for C2H6. In addition, this unique S-type adsorption phenomenon of C2H6 by HKUST−1 facilitates the separation of C2H4/C2H6 gas mixtures at low pressure. The ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) selectivity of HKUST−1 for C2H4/C2H6 at low pressure and 283 K reached 7.53, exhibiting a significant enhancement compared to the value obtained at 1 bar (3.78).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material Synthesis

The reagents and solvents utilized in this study are readily available in the market without requiring additional purification. HKUST−1 was synthesized following a modified version of the literature method. In a typical synthesis, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (716 mg, 3 mmol) and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (421 mg, 2 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture of deionized water (6 mL) and ethanol (6 mL). Subsequently, the mixture solution was stirred at room temperature for 30 min before being subjected to the reaction for one day at 383 K. Finally, the resultant blue crystals were obtained through filtration and thoroughly washed with methanol.

2.2. Gas Sorption Measurements

The nitrogen adsorption isotherms at 77 K were determined using a Quantachrome Autosorb-iQ nitrogen volumetric adsorption apparatus. Prior to analysis, the samples underwent a 10 h vacuum degassing process at 423 K to eliminate any residual guest molecules. The adsorption isotherms for C2H4 and C2H6 on HKUST−1 were determined using an Intelligent Gravimetric Analyzer (Hiden, UK, IGA002) equipped with a circulating water bath. Before conducting the adsorption measurements, HKUST−1 underwent activation at a temperature of 423 K in an ultra-high vacuum environment (10−7 mbar) for a duration of 10 h.

2.3. Computational Simulation

The adsorption positions of different gas molecules were determined through Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations in the Materials Studio’s adsorption module, utilizing experimental crystallographic data from the HKUST−1 structure. Before conducting the simulations, we optimized the guest gas molecules and structures using the Dmol3 module. The Mulliken charges of the framework atoms and ESP charges of all atoms in the gas molecule were assigned through charge assignment implemented in the Periodic Density Functional Theory (PDFT) of the Dmol3 module. The calculations employed a conformational bias method based on the COMPASSIII force field. Electrostatic and van der Waals interactions were handled using Ewald-based and atom-based summation methods, respectively, with a Lennard-Jones potential cut-off radius of 15.5 Å. The C2H6 molecule was loaded into an adsorption model at a fixed loading of 298 K using a 2 × 2 × 2 supercell as the simulation box. Both equilibrium and production steps were set to 1 × 107.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Analysis

The porous material HKUST−1 was initially reported by Williams and his collaborators, and has since been extensively investigated by numerous research teams [24,25,26]. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that HKUST−1 is composed of dimerized copper tetracarboxylate paddle-wheel building blocks (Figure 1a). In the HKUST−1 structure, each 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC) ligand is bound to three dimeric copper wheels to form a highly porous framework with a face-centered cubic lattice with Fm3-m symmetry (Figure 1c). The pore network of HKUST−1 has two different sizes of pores after removing the water in the framework. The three-dimensional porous structure exhibits a square cross-sectional main channel with an approximate diameter of 0.88 nm (Figure 1c). Additionally, it possesses tetrahedral-shaped side pockets with diameters of approximately 0.55 nm (Figure 1b), which are interconnected to the main channel through triangular windows. The synthesis of HKUST−1 was accomplished through a hydrothermal reaction involving the combination of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid, deionized water, and ethanol at a temperature of 383 K for 24 h. The PXRD pattern of HKUST−1 powder is shown in Figure S1, exhibiting a high degree of agreement with the simulated peaks. This indicates that the prepared HKUST−1 was a pure phase, and the sharp and clear peaks demonstrate its excellent crystal structure. The PXRD pattern of HKUST−1 after extraction by methanol (MeOH) remained unchanged compared to the untreated sample, suggesting that HKUST−1 retains an invariant phase composition and still possesses a microporous crystalline framework. The permanent porosity of HKUST−1 was investigated through a nitrogen adsorption and desorption curve at 77 K. According to Figure S2, HKUST−1 exhibits a type-I isothermal adsorption profile. In the low-pressure region, N2 adsorption rapidly increased with increasing pressure, indicating that HKUST−1 possesses microporous characteristics. The BET surface area in the HKUST−1 was determined by analyzing nitrogen sorption isotherms collected at 77 K during adsorption studies, yielding a value of 1420 m2 g−1 (Figure S2a). The pore size distributions determined by the DFT (Density Function Theory) model based on 77 K N2 adsorption showed values of approximately 0.55 nm and 0.90 nm (Figure S2b), which were consistent with the pore sizes obtained from crystal structure determination.
The BET surface area in the HKUST−1 was determined by analyzing nitrogen sorption isotherms collected at 77 K during adsorption studies, yielding a value of 1420 m2 g−1 (Figure S2a). The pore size distributions obtained from the nitrogen adsorption isotherm at 77 K were approximately 0.55 nm and 0.90 nm (Figure S2b), which were consistent with the pore size values determined from the crystal structure.

3.2. Adsorption Study of C2H6 and C2H4

The single-component adsorption isotherms of HKUST−1 for C2H6 and C2H4 were measured at various temperatures under the pressure of 0–1 bar (Figure 2a,b). The HKUST−1 framework exhibits an obviously preferential adsorption of C2H4 over C2H6. The adsorption capacities of C2H4 were 8.999 mmol g−1, 8.651 mmol g−1, 8.021 mmol g−1, 7.161 mmol g−1, and 6.372 mmol g−1 at temperatures of 268 K, 273 K, 283 K, 298 K, and 313 K under atmospheric pressure, respectively, which were higher than the corresponding values for C2H6 (8.755 mmol g−1, 8.349 mmol g−1, 7.566 mmol g−1, 6.245 mmol g−1, and 4.793 mmol g−1). In addition, HKUST−1 exhibited excellent thermal stability at the experimental temperature (Figure S3). The adsorption capacity of C2H4 by HKUST−1 surpasses that of C2H6 at low coverage. At high coverage, the larger size of C2H6 leads to an increased formation of hydrogen bonds between C2H6 and O atoms in the HKUST−1 framework, resulting in an enhanced adsorption capacity for C2H6 by HKUST−1. As can be observed from the C2H6 adsorption isotherm, HKUST−1 exhibits an S-shaped adsorption profile ranging from 40 mbar (268 K) to approximately 200 mbar (313 K), indicating its temperature independence and strong dependence on the concentration of C2H6.
In order to assess the adsorption affinity of C2H6 and C2H4 on HKUST−1, we calculated the isosteric heats of zero coverage (Qst, n=0) for C2H6 and C2H4 on HKUST−1 based on their adsorption isotherms at various temperatures (Figures S4–S13). Analyzing isothermal data using the virial equation [27,28]:
ln(n/p) = A0 + A1n + A2n2 + A3n3
The virial coefficients, represented as A0, A1, etc., are temperature-dependent functions in this investigation. Specifically, n represents the adsorbed amount of gas, A0 is related to the interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent, while A1 quantifies the interactions among adsorbate molecules [29]. The weak interaction force between gas molecules and the material in the low-pressure region leads to a limited surface coverage. Consequently, for this experiment, the A2, A3,… virial coefficients are disregarded, thereby allowing equation 1 to be transformed into the following form:
ln(n/p) = A0 + A1n
The calculated value of Qst, n=0 for C2H4 was determined to be 39.341 kJ mol−1 at near-zero coverage, which was higher than that of C2H6 (30.175 kJ mol−1) (Figures S14 and S15 and Figure 2c), which is due to the stronger repulsion between C2H6-C2H6 molecules compared to C2H4-C2H4 molecules and the interaction between the double bond in C2H4 and the positively charged Cu atom. It is noteworthy that the absolute value of A1 obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to the C2H6 isotherm surpassed that of the C2H4 isotherm at low coverage (Figure 2d, Figures S16 and S17). These differences are statistically significant, suggesting a stronger repulsive energy between neighboring substances for C2H6 compared to C2H4. This is one of the important reasons why the adsorption capacity of C2H6 is lower than that of C2H4 at low-coverage conditions. Under high-coverage conditions, the amount of C2H6 adsorbed by HKUST−1 increases with increasing pressure. This is due to the fact that C2H6 has a larger molecular size than C2H4, which occupies a larger volume in the pores of HKUST−1 and forms more hydrogen bonds with HKUST−1 at similar adsorption levels. These hydrogen bond formations are more likely to occur at similar adsorption levels than those observed for C2H4. This leads to the phenomenon of the S-shaped adsorption isotherm of C2H6 by HKUST−1.
The Qst value determined from the Clausius–Clapeyron equation is another important parameter for assessing the adsorption affinity of C2H6 and C2H4 (Figure 3a, Figures S18 and S19). Figure 3a illustrates the Qst curves of HKUST−1 for C2H6 and C2H4 calculated based on their isotherms. As expected, the Qst values of C2H4 were significantly higher than those of C2H6 over the measured pressure range, suggesting that C2H4 has a stronger binding affinity for HKUST−1. This observation is consistent with the single-component adsorption isotherm. As the loading amount of C2H6 and C2H4 increased, the Qst values for C2H6 and C2H4 in HKUST−1 decreased from 29.97 kJ/mol at a loading amount of 0.1 mmol g−1 to 22.16 kJ/mol at a loading amount of 2 mmol g−1 for C2H6, and from 37.13 kJ/mol at a loading amount of 0.6 mmol g−1 to 23.70 kJ/mol at a loading amount of 7.2 mmol g−1 for C2H4. This indicates that as the loading amount increases, HKUST−1 has a decreasing affinity towards C2H6 and C2H4. It is noteworthy that the Qst value of HKUST−1 tends to increase with the increase of C2H6 and C2H4 adsorption under high-coverage conditions. This is due to the fact that as the number of aggregated C2H6 and C2H4 molecules gradually increases, the distance between them and the O atoms in the framework is shortened, resulting in the formation of more hydrogen bonds. In addition, under the identical adsorption capacity condition, C2H6 is more likely to form hydrogen bonds with O atoms in the framework because of its larger size. As depicted in Figure 3a, when the adsorption amount of C2H6 reached 2 mmol g−1, HKUST−1 formed additional hydrogen bonds with C2H6, resulting in an increase in its Qst value on C2H6; whereas, it was only when the adsorption amount of C2H4 reached 7.2 mmol g−1 that HKUST−1 began forming more hydrogen bonds and caused an elevation in its Qst value on C2H4. Overall, the larger molecular size of C2H6 compared to C2H4 makes it more likely to form additional hydrogen bonds with HKUST−1 as the amount of adsorbed C2H6 and C2H4 increases. This phenomenon serves as one of the key explanations for why the adsorption isotherm of C2H6 on HKUST−1 exhibits an S-shaped behavior.

3.3. Gas Separation Properties

The C2H4/C2H6 adsorption selectivity of HKUST−1 was assessed using the ideal adsorption solution theory (IAST) at temperatures of 268 K, 273 K, 283 K, 298 K, and 313 K (Figure 3b and Figures S20–S29). The IAST selectivity of C2H4/C2H6 (1/1) for HKUST−1 at 268 K, 273 K, 283 K, 298 K, 313 K, and 1 bar are shown in Figure 3b as 3.81, 3.83, 3.78, 3.57, and 3.45, respectively. It is noteworthy that in the low-pressure region, the IAST of C2H4/C2H6 (1/1) selectivity increased significantly. Among them, the IAST selectivity of C2H4/C2H6 (1/1) increased to 8.89 at 273 K and 30 mbar. In addition, the IAST selectivity of C2H4/C2H6 (1/1) increased to 7.53 at 283 K and 50 mbar. This enhancement can be attributed to the higher repulsive force between neighboring C2H6 molecules compared to that between neighboring C2H4 molecules under low-coverage conditions, thereby rendering HKUST−1 more effective in separating C2H4/C2H6 under low pressure. However, with increasing adsorption of C2H6 and C2H4 molecules, they tend to aggregate within the pores of HKUST−1. These aggregated C2H6 molecules occupy a larger volume and exhibit a higher propensity for forming hydrogen bonds with O atoms on the pore walls of HKUST−1 compared to the aggregated C2H4 molecules, thereby significantly enhancing the adsorption capacity of HKUST−1 for C2H6. Consequently, under high-pressure conditions, HKUST−1 exhibits unsatisfactory performance in separating C2H4/C2H6.

3.4. Molecular Simulations

The separation behaviors of HKUST−1 for C2H6 were investigated through Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC), aiming to identify the adsorption sites and interactions of HKUST−1 on C2H6. The density distribution map obtained from GCMC simulation revealed the presence of two different adsorption sites for C2H6 (Figure S30). Specifically, one set of sites is situated within tetrahedral-shaped side pockets (Figure 4a), while the other site is located within square cross-sectional channels (Figure S31). This observation suggests that the binding of C2H6 molecules may be attributed to the abundance of oxygen sites within the pores. The preferential adsorption site of HKUST−1 for C2H6 is located in the tetrahedral-shaped side pockets, where each C2H6 molecule interacts with the benzene ring in three 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acids through the formation of four C-H⋅⋅⋅ᴨ interactions with a distance ranging from 3.091 to 3.547 Å. As the amount of C2H6 adsorbed increased, two C2H6 molecules were aggregated within the tetrahedral-shaped side pockets. Since C2H6 has a large volume, it occupies relatively more space within the tetrahedral-shaped side pockets and is closer to the HKUST−1 pore surface. As shown in Figure 4b, two C2H6 molecules formed six C-H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonds with five O atoms in tetrahedral-shaped side pockets at distances ranging from 2.767 to 3.450 Å. The increase in the number of hydrogen bonds resulted in the enhancement of C2H6 adsorption capacity of HKUST−1, which is consistent with the experimentally observed increase in C2H6 adsorption by HKUST−1 at high C2H6 coverage.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we experimentally investigated the adsorption isotherms of C2H6 and C2H4 on HKUST−1 at different temperatures and investigated the disparities in affinity between HKUST−1 and C2H6, as well as C2H4, using both the virial equation and the Clausius–Clapeyron equation. It was observed that the absolute value of A1 obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to C2H6 isotherms was higher than that obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to C2H4 isotherms at low coverage, indicating a stronger repulsive force between C2H6-C2H6 molecules compared to that between C2H4-C2H4. This difference in repulsive forces contributes significantly to the lower adsorption capacity of HKUST−1 for C2H6 at low coverage. At high coverage, due to the larger molecular size of C2H6, aggregation occurs within the pore channels leading to closer proximity between individual molecules and the pore wall of HKUST−1. Consequently, more hydrogen bonding takes place, resulting in an increased amount of C2H6. Under low and high coverage conditions, HKUST−1 exhibits distinct adsorption mechanisms for C2H6, resulting in the observation of an S-shaped adsorption phenomenon on HKUST−1. Moreover, it provides more favorable conditions for achieving efficient separation of C2H4/C2H6 under low pressure. The selectivity of HKUST−1 for C2H4/C2H6 was found to be 3.78 at 283 K and 1 bar; however, this selectivity significantly increased to 7.53 under low pressure, confirming the potential feasibility of employing HKUST−1 for efficient separation of C2H4 from C2H4/C2H6 mixtures under low pressure. Overall, this study not only elucidates the S-shaped adsorption isotherm of C2H6 by HKUST−1, but also highlights the significant potential for separating complex gas mixtures based on differences in repulsive forces among different guest molecules and interactions between different guest molecules and the framework. This unique mechanism is expected to advance the field of C2H4/C2H6 separation technology and contribute to the realization of a more energy-efficient and cleaner environment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/chemistry6060077/s1, Figure S1. Pattern of synthesized and methanol-treated HKUST−1.; Figure S2: (a) Adsorption–desorption isotherms of N2 on HKUST−1 at 77 K. (b) The pore size distribution of HKUST−1; Figure S3. Experimental plot of two cycles of C2H6 single-component adsorption isotherms for HKUST−1 in the 0-1 bar; Figure S4. Virial fitting curves for C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 268 K in the low-pressure region; Figure S5. Virial fitting curves for C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 273 K in the low-pressure region; Figure S6. Virial fitting curves for C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 283 K in the low-pressure region; Figure S7. Virial fitting curves for C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 298 K in the low-pressure region; Figure S8. Virial fitting curves for C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 313 K in the low-pressure region; Figure S9. Virial fitting curves for C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 268 K in the low-pressure region; Figure S10. Virial fitting curves for C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 273 K in the low-pressure region; Figure S11. Virial fitting curves for C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 283 K in the low-pressure region. Figure S12. Virial fitting curves for C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 298 K in the low-pressure region. Figure S13. Virial fitting curves for C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 313 K in the low-pressure region; Figure S14. Absolute value of A0 obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to the C2H6 isotherm under low-coverage conditions; Figure S15. Absolute value of A0 obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to the C2H4 isotherm under low-coverage conditions; Figure S16. Absolute value of A1 obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to the C2H6 isotherm under low-coverage conditions; Figure S17. Absolute value of A1 obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to the C2H4 isotherm under low-coverage conditions; Figure S18. Graphs of lnP versus 1/T for C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 using temperatures in the range of 268-313 K; Figure S19. Graphs of lnP versus 1/T for C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 using temperatures in the range of 268-313 K; Figure S20. Fitting of the C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 268 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S21. Fitting of the C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 273 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S22. Fitting of the C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 283 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S23. Fitting of the C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 298 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S24. Fitting of the C2H4 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 313 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S25. Fitting of the C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 268 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S26. Fitting of the C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 273 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S27. Fitting of the C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 283 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S28. Fitting of the C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 298 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S29. Fitting of the C2H6 adsorption isotherms on HKUST−1 at 313 K using the dual-site Langmuir Freundlich (DSLF) model; Figure S30. The density distribution plots of C2H6 gas adsorption. Figure S31. Preferential adsorption site for C2H6 in the square cross-sectional main channel of HKUST−1.

Author Contributions

X.Z., Q.F. and X.K. designed the experiments; W.X., L.Y. (Lingzhi Yang) and X.Y. synthesized samples, performed testing, and analyzed data; W.X. wrote the original draft preparation; X.Z., Q.F. and L.Y. (Liting Yan), edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22205189, 52302271), the Science, Education, and Industry Integration Innovation Pilot Project of Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) (No. 2024RCKY019), the Youth Innovation and Technology Support Plan of Shandong Province (No. 2022KJ135), and the Colleges and Universities Twenty Terms Foundation of Jinan City (No. 202228053).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Amghizar, I.; Vandewalle, L.A.; Van Geem, K.M.; Marin, G.B. New Trends in Olefin Production. Engineering 2017, 3, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mukherjee, S.; Sensharma, D.; Chen, K.J.; Zaworotko, M.J. Crystal engineering of porous coordination networks to enable separation of C2 hydrocarbons. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 10419–10441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eldridge, R.B. Olefin/paraffin separation technology: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 2208–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sholl, D.S.; Lively, R.P. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 2016, 532, 435–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, L.; Qian, S.; Wang, X.; Cui, X.; Chen, B.; Xing, H. Energy-efficient separation alternatives: Metal-organic frameworks and membranes for hydrocarbon separation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 5359–5406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, M.Y.; Song, B.Q.; Sensharma, D.; Zaworotko, M.J. Crystal engineering of porous coordination networks for C3 hydrocarbon separation. SmartMat 2020, 2, 38–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, X.; Xie, W.; Wu, J.; Miao, Y.; Xiang, C.; Chen, C.; Ge, B.; Gan, Z.; Yang, F.; Zhang, M.; et al. Recent advances in direct air capture by adsorption. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 6574–6651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.S.; Zhang, X.J.; Ba, Y.Q.; Li, T.Y.; Hao, G.P.; Lu, A.H. Recent Advances in Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Adsorptive Separation of Light Hydrocarbons. Research 2022, 2022, 9780864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, S.; Chen, Y.; Yue, B.; Wang, C.; Qin, B.; Chai, Y.; Wu, G.; Li, J.; Han, X.; da-Silva, I.; et al. Regulating Extra-Framework Cations in Faujasite Zeolites for Capture of Trace Carbon Dioxide. Chem. Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202201659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, Y.; Ma, Z.; Lin, R.-B.; Krishna, R.; Zhou, W.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, S.; Chen, B. Pore Space Partition within a Metal–Organic Framework for Highly Efficient C2H2/CO2 Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4130–4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, J.; Qian, X.; Lin, R.B.; Krishna, R.; Wu, H.; Zhou, W.; Chen, B. Mixed Metal–Organic Framework with Multiple Binding Sites for Efficient C2H2/CO2 Separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 4396–4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, Y.B.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; He, L.; Huang, J.L.; Wei, W.J.; Yuan, Z.; Xiong, Z.L.; Chen, H.D.; Xiang, S.C.; et al. A Microporous Hydrogen Bonded Organic Framework for Highly Selective Separation of Carbon Dioxide over Acetylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202311419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Peng, Y.; Krungleviciute, V.; Eryazici, I.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K.; Yildirim, T. Methane Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Current Records, Surprise Findings, and Challenges. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11887–11894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shivanna, M.; Otake, K.I.; Song, B.Q.; van Wyk, L.M.; Yang, Q.Y.; Kumar, N.; Feldmann, W.K.; Pham, T.; Suepaul, S.; Space, B.; et al. Benchmark Acetylene BindingAffinity and Separation through Induced Fit in aFlexible Hybrid Ultramicroporous Material. Angew.Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 20383–20390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gutiérrez-Sevillano, J.J.; Vicent-Luna, J.M.; Dubbeldam, D.; Calero, S. Molecular Mechanisms for Adsorption in Cu-BTC Metal Organic Framework. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 11357–11366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Q.M.; Shen, D.M.; Bülow, M.; Lau, M.L.; Deng, S.G.; Fitch, F.R.; Lemcoff, N.O.; Semanscin, J. Metallo-organic molecular sieve for gas separation and purification. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2002, 55, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nicholson, T.M.; Bhatia, S.K. Electrostatically Mediated Specific Adsorption of Small Molecules in Metallo-Organic Frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 24834–24836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, Y.; Tang, X.; Chen, M.; Mishima, A.; Li, L.; Hori, A.; Wu, X.; Ding, L.; Kusaka, S.; Matsuda, R. Design of a MOF based on octa-nuclear zinc clusters realizing both thermal stability and structural flexibility. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 1139–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Foo, M.L.; Matsuda, R.; Hijikata, Y.; Krishna, R.; Sato, H.; Horike, S.; Hori, A.; Duan, J.G.; Sato, Y.; Kubota, Y.; et al. An Adsorbate Discriminatory Gate Effect in a Flexible Porous Coordination Polymer for Selective Adsorption of CO2 over C2H2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3022–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, W.; Wang, G.D.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.Y.; Hou, L.; Yang, Q.Y.; Liu, B. Discriminatory Gate-Opening Effect in a Flexible Metal–Organic Framework for Inverse CO2/C2H2 Separation. Small 2023, 19, 2302975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Janabi, N.; Hill, P.; Torrente-Murciano, L.; Garforth, A.; Gorgojo, P.; Siperstein, F.; Fan, X. Mapping the Cu-BTC metal–organic framework (HKUST−1) stability envelope in the presence of water vapour for CO2 adsorption from flue gases. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 281, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Yang, Y.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Li, Z. Competitive adsorption and selectivity of benzene and water vapor on the microporous metal organic frameworks (HKUST−1). Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 259, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ismail, R.; Azman, N.H.N.; Mohanadas, D.; Mustafa, M.N.; Mohd Abdah, M.A.A.; Raman, V.; Abdullah, J.; Sulaiman, Y. Facile ultrasonication synthesis of MXene/HKUST-1 composite as positive electrode for supercapattery. J. Energy Storage 2024, 94, 112461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ursueguía, D.; Daniel, C.; Collomb, C.; Cardenas, C.; Farrusseng, D.; Díaz, E.; Ordóñez, S. Evaluation of HKUST−1 as Volatile Organic Compound Adsorbents for Respiratory Filters. Langmuir 2022, 38, 14465–14474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sun, J.Q.; Shang, M.G.; Zhang, M.N.; Yu, S.M.; Yuan, Z.P.; Yi, X.B.; Filatov, S.; Zhang, J. Konjac glucomannan/cellulose nanofibers composite aerogel supported HKUST−1 for CO2 adsorption. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 293, 119720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pan, J.Y.; Bai, X.T.; Li, Y.Y.; Yang, B.H.; Yang, P.Y.; Yu, F.; Ma, J. HKUST−1 derived carbon adsorbents for tetracycline removal with excellent adsorption performance. Environ. Res. 2022, 205, 112425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, X.B.; Xiao, B.; Fletcher, A.J.; Thomas, K.M. Hydrogen adsorption on functionalized nanoporous activated carbons. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8880–8888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cole, J.H.; Everett, D.H.; Marshall, C.T.; Paniego, A.R.; Powl, J.C.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F. Thermodynamics of the high temperature adsorption of some permanent gases by porous carbons. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 1974, 70, 2154–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, X.B.; Villar-Rodil, S.; Fletcher, A.J.; Thomas, K.M. Kinetic isotope effect for H2 and D2 quantum molecular sieving in adsorption/desorption on porous carbon materials. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 9947–9955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Paddle-wheeled dicopper tetracarboxylic acid building block unit (BBU) of HKUST−1. (b) Secondary building unit (SBU) of HKUST−1. (c) Structure of the skeleton of HKUST−1 with quadruple symmetry of nanochannels observed along the c-axis direction.
Figure 1. (a) Paddle-wheeled dicopper tetracarboxylic acid building block unit (BBU) of HKUST−1. (b) Secondary building unit (SBU) of HKUST−1. (c) Structure of the skeleton of HKUST−1 with quadruple symmetry of nanochannels observed along the c-axis direction.
Chemistry 06 00077 g001
Figure 2. Experimental C2H6 (a) and C2H4 (b) single-component adsorption isotherms for HKUST−1 in the 0−1 bar. (c) Calculation of Qst at zero surface coverage for the adsorption of C2H6 and C2H4 on HKUST−1 under low coverage condition. (d) Absolute value of A1 obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to the C2H6 and C2H4 isotherm under low coverage condition.
Figure 2. Experimental C2H6 (a) and C2H4 (b) single-component adsorption isotherms for HKUST−1 in the 0−1 bar. (c) Calculation of Qst at zero surface coverage for the adsorption of C2H6 and C2H4 on HKUST−1 under low coverage condition. (d) Absolute value of A1 obtained from fitting HKUST−1 to the C2H6 and C2H4 isotherm under low coverage condition.
Chemistry 06 00077 g002
Figure 3. (a) The isosteric enthalpies of adsorption for C2H4 and C2H6 in HKUST−1 at 298 K. (b) Predicted selectivity of HKUST−1 based on IAST method for equimolar C2H4/C2H6 mixture temperatures in the range of 268–313 K.
Figure 3. (a) The isosteric enthalpies of adsorption for C2H4 and C2H6 in HKUST−1 at 298 K. (b) Predicted selectivity of HKUST−1 based on IAST method for equimolar C2H4/C2H6 mixture temperatures in the range of 268–313 K.
Chemistry 06 00077 g003
Figure 4. (a) The primary adsorption sites of C2H6 on HKUST−1. (b) Adsorption sites in tetrahedral-shaped side pockets at high coverage of C2H6.
Figure 4. (a) The primary adsorption sites of C2H6 on HKUST−1. (b) Adsorption sites in tetrahedral-shaped side pockets at high coverage of C2H6.
Chemistry 06 00077 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, W.; Fu, Q.; Kong, X.; Yuan, X.; Yang, L.; Yan, L.; Zhao, X. Understanding the Enhanced Separation Mechanism of C2H4/C2H6 at Low Pressure by HKUST−1. Chemistry 2024, 6, 1326-1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry6060077

AMA Style

Xie W, Fu Q, Kong X, Yuan X, Yang L, Yan L, Zhao X. Understanding the Enhanced Separation Mechanism of C2H4/C2H6 at Low Pressure by HKUST−1. Chemistry. 2024; 6(6):1326-1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry6060077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Wenpeng, Qiuju Fu, Xiangjun Kong, Xiangsen Yuan, Lingzhi Yang, Liting Yan, and Xuebo Zhao. 2024. "Understanding the Enhanced Separation Mechanism of C2H4/C2H6 at Low Pressure by HKUST−1" Chemistry 6, no. 6: 1326-1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry6060077

APA Style

Xie, W., Fu, Q., Kong, X., Yuan, X., Yang, L., Yan, L., & Zhao, X. (2024). Understanding the Enhanced Separation Mechanism of C2H4/C2H6 at Low Pressure by HKUST−1. Chemistry, 6(6), 1326-1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry6060077

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop