Next Article in Journal
Synthesized and Designed New Modified Poly(vinyl chloride) Structures to Enhance Their Photo-Resistance Characteristics
Next Article in Special Issue
Structure and Bonding in Planar Hypercoordinate Carbon Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Sorption-Assisted Ultrafiltration Hybrid Method for Treatment of the Radioactive Aqueous Solutions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Pentacoordinate Carbon Atoms in a Ferrocene Dication Derivative—[Fe(Si2-η5-C5H2)2]2+

by
Shilpa Shajan
1,
Jin-Chang Guo
2,
Aland Sinjari
3,
Krishnan Thirumoorthy
1 and
Venkatesan S. Thimmakondu
4,*
1
School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632 014, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Nanocluster Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
3
School of Mathematics, Biological, Exercise & Physical Sciences, San Diego Miramar College, San Diego, CA 92126-2910, USA
4
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-1030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemistry 2022, 4(4), 1092-1100; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040074
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 19 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hypercoordinate Carbon)

Abstract

:
Pentacoordinate carbon atoms are theoretically predicted here in a ferrocene dication derivative in the eclipsed-(1; C 2 v ), gauche-(2; C 2 ) and staggered-[Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + (3; C 2 h ) forms for the first time. Energetically, the relative energy gaps for 2 and 3 range from −3.06 to 16.74 and −2.78 to 40.34 kJ mol 1 , respectively, when compared to the singlet electronic state of 1 at different levels. The planar tetracoordinate carbon (ptC) atom in the ligand Si 2 C 5 H 2 becomes a pentacoordinate carbon upon complexation. The ligand with a ptC atom was predicted to be both a thermodynamically and kinetically stable molecule by some of us in our earlier theoretical works. Natural bond orbital and adaptive natural density partitioning analyses confirm the pentacoordinate nature of carbon in these three complexes (13). Although they are hypothetical at the moment, they support the idea of “hypercoordinate metallocenes” within organometallic chemistry. Moreover, ab initio molecular dynamics simulations carried out at 298 K temperature for 2000 fs suggest that these molecules are kinetically stable.

1. Introduction

Ferrocene, Fe( η 5 -C 5 H 5 ) 2 , is an important molecule that has been used over the last seven decades [1,2,3,4]. It opened a new avenue called organometallic chemistry, which has been continuously growing since 1951 [5,6,7,8,9]. Here, using Si 2 C 5 H 2 as a ligand instead of cyclopentadienyl anion (C 5 H 5 ), three ferrocene derivative dication structures are theoretically identified—eclipsed-(1; C 2 v ), gauche-(2; C 2 ), and staggered-[Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + (3; C 2 h )—that shows hypercoordinate nature (pentacoordination) to its one of the ligand carbon atoms (see Figure 1). Before complexation, the bare ligand contains a planar tetracoordinate carbon (ptC) atom [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In the last five decades, many molecules containing ptC atom have been theoretically predicted [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] because of the pioneering theoretical work of Hoffmann [10,31] and Schleyer [11,32], and some are experimentally realized [33,34,35,36,37]. All the structures (13) exhibit two pentacoordinate carbon atoms, each upon forming a complex with Fe 2 + . Carbon showing hypercoordinate behavior—either penta or hexa—is rare but not very new to chemists [38,39,40,41,42]. Non-planar pentacoordination to carbon has already been well established in systems such as CH 5 + [38,43], CLi 5 [44], C(CH 3 ) 5 + [45], [(Ph 3 PAu) 5 C] + [46], and Si 2 (CH 3 ) 7 + [47]. Likewise, non-planar hexacoordination to carbon has been proven in CLi 6 [44,48], [(Ph 3 PAu) 6 C] 2 + [49], and C 6 (CH 3 ) 6 2 + [50,51]. Carbon atom having heptacoordination is theoretically predicted in CH 7 3 + [52], [CTi 7 ] 2 + [53], and also in trophylium trication, C 7 H 7 3 + [54]. The octacoordination of carbon atom was also theoretically established in carborane clusters [55] and CBe 8 H 12 [56]. Through [Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + , our aim is to open a new avenue within organometallic chemistry called “hypercoordinated metallocenes containing five bonds to carbon” [57,58,59,60].
Various isomers of Si 2 C 5 H 2 have been theoretically identified by some of us in an earlier theoretical work and it was concluded that the molecule with a ptC atom, 2,7-disilatricyclo[4.1.0.0 1 , 3 ]hept-2,4,6-trien-2,7-diyl, is the most stable structure thermodynamically [27]. The global minimum geometry of Si 2 C 5 H 2 has been theoretically verified elsewhere through search algorithms [61]. The kinetic stability of the thermodynamically most stable isomer through appropriate dissociation pathways has been analyzed in detail recently [62]. It was proven theoretically that the global minimum isomer of Si 2 C 5 H 2 with a ptC atom is not only thermodynamically stable but also kinetically stable [62]. Thus, in this work, new complexes using Si 2 C 5 H 2 as a ligand with Fe(II) are theoretically characterized here. Optimized structures of eclipsed-, gauche-, and staggered-[Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + obtained at the ω B97X-D/def2-TZVP level of theory are shown in Figure 1a, Figure 1c, and Figure 1e, respectively. Like ferrocene, the oxidation state of Fe in all three different forms (1, 2, and 3) is +2 (i.e., Fe(II) [Ar] 3d 6 ). However, the ligands (Si 2 C 5 H 2 ) are neutral here with 6π electrons each. Nevertheless, these complexes do attain the 18-electron configuration or to put it in simpler terms, they do follow the effective atomic number (EAN) rule (EAN = 36; 24 electrons from Fe(II) and 12π electrons from the ligands) and attain the electron configuration of Kr.

2. Computational Details

All geometry optimization and frequency calculations were carried out using def2-TZVP basis sets [63]. Various density functionals were used such as B3LYP [64], TPSSh [65], M06-L [66], and ω B97X-D [67]. Calculations were also carried out with empirical dispersion corrections (D3) [68] with Becke–Johnson damping (BJ) [69,70] (i.e., B3LYP-D3BJ, TPSSh-D3BJ) to observe the geometrical changes due to dispersion (van der Waals) interactions. Natural bond orbital analyses were conducted using ω B97X-D functional to obtain the natural atomic charges and Wiberg bond indices (WBIs) [71]. Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations using the atom-centered density matrix propagation (ADMP) [72] method were also carried out to check the kinetic stability of these complexes. All calculations were carried out using the Gaussian program package [73].

3. Results and Discussion

The zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE) corrected-relative energies and Gibbs free energies obtained for 13 at different levels for the singlet and quintet electronic states are shown in Table 1. It is noted here that calculations were carried out for the triplet electronic states of these complexes. However, they turned out to be lying above singlets and quartets and thus for brevity they are given in the supporting information (see Table S3 for details). Bonding pattern obtained for eclipsed conformer (1) through AdNDP analysis is shown in Figure 2.

3.1. Energetics

As far as relative stability is concerned among the three, different DFT functionals gave us different results (see Table 1). The quintet electronic state of the staggered (3) form is the most stable at the ω B97X-D/def2-TZVP level. However, with the same def2-TZVP basis set, functionals such as M06-L, TPSSh, and TPSSh-D3BJ predict that the singlet electronic state of the eclipsed form (1) is the most stable. With the popular functional B3LYP, though we obtain the quintet of 3 as the most stable, adding empirical dispersion corrections on top of B3LYP (i.e, B3LYP-D3BJ) changes the result yet again because at the B3LYP-D3BJ/def2-TZVP level, the quintet of gauche-form (2) is the most stable. Like ferrocene, the relative energy gap (∼4 kJ mol 1 ) between staggered and eclipsed forms is quite small [8]. In the parent molecule, as per gas-phase calculations, the staggered form is a saddle-point (transition state) and the eclipsed form is a minimum [74]. In the derivatives studied here, all the three different forms in their singlet ground electronic state are minima at all levels. The quintet electronic states of staggered (3) and gauche (2) conformers are also minima whereas the eclipsed (1) conformer of quintet either turns out to be a transition-state or a second-order saddle-point at different levels. Our main motivation in this study is to analyze the bonding scenario and thus we leave this discussion with a caveat that various DFT functionals including the popular B3LYP underestimate the barrier-heights [75,76].

3.2. Bonding

Let us analyze the bonding scenario in these cations (13) as each isomer contains two pentacoordinate carbon atoms. The C-C bond length in 1 ( C 2 v ) range from 1.42 to 1.47 Å (see Figure 1a), whereas in 2 ( C 2 ) and 3 ( C 2 h ) it varies from 1.41 to 1.46 Å (see Figure 1c,e). Compared to ferrocene [77], where the mean C-C bond length is equal to 1.431 Å, these bond lengths are slightly varied, which is reasonable due to the ionic character (dication) in these complexes apart from the presence of silicon atoms. Likewise, the Fe-C bond length in 1 range from 2.07 to 2.10 Å, whereas in 2 and 3 it varies from 2.07 to 2.11 Å and 2.07 to 2.12 Å, respectively. In ferrocene, the mean Fe-C bond length is equal to 2.059 Å and here they are slightly longer. The Si-C bond length connected to the pentacoordinate carbon is 1.98 Å in 1, 1.97 and 1.99 Å in 2, and 1.99 Å in 3, which reflects its single bond characteristics whereas the Si-C bond on the sides are shorter with a bond length of 1.79 Å in all the three forms. In principle, the isolated Si 2 C 5 H 2 ligand almost behaves like a cyclopentadienyl anion (C 5 H 5 ), with a slight exception that the former contains a 3center-2electron (3c-2e) σ bond (see Figure 2) around the Si-C-Si region [61,62]. This is evidently seen even when it makes complexation with Fe(II).

3.3. Wiberg Bond Indices

The presence of pentacoordinate carbon atoms could be further justified with the WBIs calculated for 1, 2, and 3, in Figure 1b, Figure 1d, and Figure 1f, respectively. In all cases, the WBI values for Fe-C are in the range of 0.39 to 0.42. This indicates that they are indeed single bonds. The hypercoordinate C-Si WBI values in 1 and 3 are 0.40 and 0.38, respectively, whereas for 2 we obtained two values due to reduced symmetry and they are 0.37 and 0.41, respectively. All these values also reflect the single bond characteristics of these bonds. The Si-C WBI values in 1 to 3 are in the range of 0.71 to 0.70 showing single bond characteristics. WBI values for all C-C bond lengths are greater than one, which indicates resonance stabilization plus double bond characteristics. On the basis of these values, one could certainly conclude that the central carbon atoms are hypercoordinate (penta) in all the three forms. It is emphasized here that each hypercoordinate carbon obeys the octet-rule as the total WBI for each pentacoordinate carbon is 3.62 for 1 and 2, whereas it is 3.61 for 3. However, some of the bonds (Si-C and C-Fe) are electron-deficient bonds with fewer than two electrons as mentioned elsewhere in the example of C(CH 3 ) 5 + [45].

3.4. AdNDP Analysis

To clarify the chemical bonding pattern further in these complexes, we carried out adaptive natural density partitioning (AdNDP) analysis [78,79] using the Multiwfn [80] program. For brevity, only the bonding patterns of the eclipsed conformer alone are shown here. In total, 66 valence electrons 1 are taken into account. Seven lone-pairs (LPs), four 2c-2e C-H bonds, ten 2c-2e C-C bonds, four 2c-2e C-Si bonds, two 3c-2e Si-C-Si σ bonds, and six 19c-2e d π - p π are shown in Figure 2. Among them, the latter are more important as they support the pentacoordinate nature of the central carbon atom. Though 13 are hypothetical examples at the moment, theoretically, these complexes support the idea of “hypercoordinate metallocenes” within organometallic chemistry.

3.5. MD Simulations

To verify the kinetic stability of the ferrocene derivatives (13), we have carried out ab initio molecular dynamics simulations using ADMP method [72]. These simulations are done at 298 K temperature and 1 atm pressure for 2000 fs time. For brevity, the time evolution of total energy for the eclipsed isomer 1 computed at the ω B97XD/def2-TZVP level for 2000 fs time scale is shown in Figure 3. Similar plots for isomers 2 and 3 are shown in the supporting information. To clearly depict the alteration of the structure over the 2000 fs of time, snapshots at 400 fs interval have been added. Considering the low-energy gap among the three different forms, it is not surprising to see that the structure rotates quite freely and at the time of 1200 fs itself, one could notice a structure that is very close to the gauche-form (2). However, none of the structures broke altogether, which indicates that all these three different forms of [Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + are kinetically stable.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, three ferrocene derivatives (13) are theoretically identified here using DFT at different levels. All of them contain two pentacoordinate carbon atoms. NBO and AdNDP analyses confirm that they are indeed pentacoordinate carbons. Ab initio MD simulations carried out at 298 K temperature for 2000 fs assert that they are kinetically stable molecules. For each pentacoordinate carbon, one 3c-2e Si-C-Si σ -bond (total two for each molecule) and three 19c-2e d π - p π -bonds (total six for each molecule) exist and they follow the existing pattern of (2 σ + 6 π )-dual aromaticity, which is a well-established pattern in ptC and hypercoordinate carbon molecules. Since the ligand here (Si 2 C 5 H 2 ) contains a ptC atom before complexation, these results are surprising. Theoretically, this new class of molecules could be termed “hypercoordinate metallocenes”.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/chemistry4040074/s1, Supplementary file S1: Supporting information for this paper.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.S.T.; methodology, S.S., V.S.T. and J.-C.G.; software, S.S., K.T., A.S. and V.S.T.; validation, V.S.T. and J.-C.G.; formal analysis, V.S.T., S.S., K.T. and A.S.; investigation, S.S., J.-C.G., A.S. and V.S.T.; resources, K.T., J.-C.G. and V.S.T.; data curation, S.S. and V.S.T.; writing—original draft preparation, V.S.T.; writing—review and editing, V.S.T.; visualization, S.S., J.-C.G. and V.S.T.; supervision, V.S.T.; project administration, V.S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work did not receive any specific grant from public or private funding agencies. However, computational support provided at the SDSU (for AS and VST) by DURIP Grant W911NF-10-1-0157 from the U.S. Department of Defense and by NSF CRIF 338 Grant CHE-0947087 is gratefully acknowledged.

Data Availability Statement

Data available in article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Additional computational support provided to SS and KT at VIT, Vellore, India, is also gratefully acknowledged. VST thanks Andrew L. Cooksy (SDSU, San Diego) for providing additional computing time.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADMPAtom-Centered Density Matrix Propagation
AIMDAb Initio Molecular Dynamics
AdNDPAdaptive Natural Density Partitioning
DFTDensity functional theory
EANEffective Atomic Number
MDMolecular Dynamics
NBONatural Bond Order
ptCplanar tetracoordinate carbon
WBIWiberg Bond Index

References

  1. Kealy, T.J.; Pauson, P.L. A New Type of Organo-Iron Compound. Nature 1951, 168, 1039–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wilkinson, G.; Rosenblum, M.; Whiting, M.C.; Woodward, R.B. The Structure of Iron Bis-Cyclopentadienyl. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 2125–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fischer, E.O.; Pfab, W. Cyclopentadien-Metallkomplexe, Ein Neuer Typ Metallorganischer Verbindungen. Z. Naturforschg B 1952, 7, 377–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pfab, W.; Fischer, E.O. Zur Kristallstruktur der Di-cyclopentadienyl-Verbindungen des Zweiwertigen Eisens, Kobalts und Nickels. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1953, 274, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Werner, H. At Least 60 Years of Ferrocene: The Discovery and Rediscovery of the Sandwich Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6052–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mohammadi, N.; Ganesan, A.; Chantler, C.T.; Wang, F. Differentiation of Ferrocene D5d and D5h Conformers Using IR Spectroscopy. J. Organomet. Chem. 2012, 713, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Walawalkar, M.G.; Pandey, P.; Murugavel, R. The Redox Journey of Iconic Ferrocene: Ferrocenium Dications and Ferrocenate Anions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 12632–12635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Astruc, D. Why is Ferrocene so Exceptional? Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 6–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Malischewski, M.; Adelhardt, M.; Sutter, J.; Meyer, K.; Seppelt, K. Isolation and Structural and Electronic Characterization of Salts of the Decamethylferrocene Dication. Science 2016, 353, 678–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hoffmann, R.; Alder, R.W.; Wilcox, C.F. Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 4992–4993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, L.M.; Ganz, E.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Z.X.; Schleyer, P.V.R. Four Decades of the Chemistry of Planar Hypercoordinate Compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9468–9501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yañez, O.; Vásquez-Espinal, A.; Báez-Grez, R.; Rabanal-León, W.A.; Osorio, E.; Ruiz, L.; Tiznado, W. Carbon rings decorated with group 14 elements: New aromatic clusters containing planar tetracoordinate carbon. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 6781–6785. [Google Scholar]
  13. Raghunathan, S.; Yadav, K.; Rojisha, V.C.; Jaganade, T.; Prathyusha, V.; Bikkina, S.; Lourderaj, U.; Priyakumar, U.D. Transition between [R]- and [S]-stereoisomers without bond breaking. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 14983–14991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zheng, H.F.; Yu, S.; Hu, T.D.; Xu, J.; Ding, Y.H. CAl3X (X = B/Al/Ga/In/Tl) with 16 valence electrons: Can planar tetracoordinate carbon be stable? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 26266–26272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Job, N.; Khatun, M.; Thirumoorthy, K.; CH, S.S.R.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Anoop, A.; Thimmakondu, V.S. CAl4Mg0/−: Global Minima with a Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Atom. Atoms 2021, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Das, P.; Chattaraj, P.K. CSiGa Al 2 / 0 and CGeGa Al 2 / 0 Having Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Atoms in Their Global Minimum Energy Structures. J. Comput. Chem. 2022, 43, 894–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Merino, G.; Méndez-Rojas, M.A.; Beltrán, H.I.; Corminboeuf, C.; Heine, T.; Vela, A. Theoretical Analysis of the Smallest Carbon Cluster Containing a Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16160–16169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, Y.B.; Li, Z.X.; Pu, X.H.; Wang, Z.X. Design of Molecular Chains Based on the Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Unit C2Al4. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 13187–13192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suresh, C.H.; Frenking, G. Direct 1-3 Metal-Carbon Bonding and Planar Tetracoordinated Carbon in Group 6 Metallacyclobutadienes. Organometallics 2010, 29, 4766–4769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, C.; Wang, P.; Liang, J.; Jia, W.; Cao, Z. Theoretical study on a family of organic molecules with planar tetracoordinate carbon. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2010, 941, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thirumoorthy, K.; Karton, A.; Thimmakondu, V.S. From High-Energy C7H2 Isomers with A Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Atom to An Experimentally Known Carbene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 9054–9064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Guo, J.; Chai, H.; Duan, Q.; Qin, J.; Shen, X.; Jiang, D.; Hou, J.; Yan, B.; Li, Z.; Gu, F.; et al. Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Species CLi3E with 12-valence-electrons. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 4589–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wu, Y.B.; Jiang, J.L.; Lu, H.G.; Wang, Z.X.; Perez-Peralta, N.; Islas, R.; Contreras, M.; Merino, G.; Wu, J.I.; Schleyer, P.V.R. Starlike Aluminum Carbon Aromatic Species. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Thirumoorthy, K.; Thimmakondu, V.S. Flat Crown Ethers with Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Atoms. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2021, 121, e26479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, J.C.; Wu, H.X.; Ren, G.M.; Miao, C.Q.; Li, Y.X. D3h X3 Li 3 + (X = C, Si and Ge): Superalkali cations containing three planar tetracoordinate X atoms. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2016, 1083, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thimmakondu, V.S.; Thirumoorthy, K. Si3C2H2 Isomers with A Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon or Silicon Atom(s). Comput. Theor. Chem. 2019, 1157, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thirumoorthy, K.; Cooksy, A.L.; Thimmakondu, V.S. Si2C5H2 Isomers - Search Algorithms versus Chemical Intuition. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 5865–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Das, P.; Chattaraj, P.K. In Silico Studies on Selected Neutral Molecules, CGa2Ge2, CAlGaGe2, and CSiGa2Ge Containing Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon. Atoms 2021, 9, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, M.H.; Orozco-Ic, M.; Leyva-Parra, L.; Tiznado, W.; Barroso, J.; Ding, Y.H.; Cui, Z.H.; Merino, G. Planar Tetracoordinate Carbons in Allene-Type Structures. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 3009–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Das, P.; Khatun, M.; Anoop, A.; Chattaraj, P.K. CSin Ge 4 n 2 + (n = 1–3): Prospective Systems Containing Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon (ptC). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 16701–16711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pancharatna, P.D.; Méndez-Rojas, M.A.; Merino, G.; Vela, A.; Hoffmann, R. Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon in Extended Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15309–15315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Collins, J.B.; Dill, J.D.; Jemmis, E.D.; Apeloig, Y.; Schleyer, P.V.R.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J.A. Stabilization of Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 5419–5427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, X.; Zhang, H.F.; Wang, L.S.; Geske, G.; Boldyrev, A. Pentaatomic Tetracoordinate Planar Carbon, [CAl4]2−: A New Structural Unit and Its Salt Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3630–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Yu, S.; Ding, Y.H.; Bowen, K.H. Identifying the Hydrogenated Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study of CAl4H and CAl4H. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 2263–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Röttger, D.; Erker, G. Compounds Containing Planar-Tetracoordinate Carbon. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 812–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, X.; Zhai, H.J.; Wang, L.S. Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Pentaatomic Tetracoordinate Planar Carbon Molecules: CAl3Si and CAl3Ge. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 357, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, C.J.; Wang, P.; Xu, X.L.; Xu, H.G.; Zheng, W.J. Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Theoretical Study of Aln C 5 / 0 (n = 1–5) Clusters: Structural Evolution, Relative Stability of Star-Like Clusters, and Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Structures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 1967–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tal’rose, V.L.; Lyubimova, A.K. Secondary Processes in the Ion Source of the Mass Spectrometer. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1952, 86, 909–912. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yamashita, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Akiba, K.Y.; Hashizume, D.; Iwasaki, F.; Takagi, N.; Nagase, S. Syntheses and Structures of Hypervalent Pentacoordinate Carbon and Boron Compounds Bearing an Anthracene Skeleton-Elucidation of Hypervalent Interaction Based on X-ray Analysis and DFT Calculation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fernández, I.; Uggerud, E.; Frenking, G. Stable Pentacoordinate Carbocations: Structure and Bonding. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 8620–8626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yamaguchi, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kinoshita, D.; Akiba, K.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Reed, C.A.; Hashizume, D.; Iwasaki, F. Synthesis and Structure of a Hexacoordinate Carbon Compound. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6894–6895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vassilev-Galindo, V.; Pan, S.; Donald, J.K.; Merino, G. Planar Pentacoordinate Carbons. Nat. Chem. Rev. 2018, 2, 0114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. White, E.T.; Tang, J.; Oka, T. CH5+: The Infrared Spectrum Observed. Science 1999, 284, 135–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Schleyer, P.v.R.; Würthwein, E.U.; Kaufmann, E.; Clark, T.; Pople, J.A. Effectively Hypervalent Molecules. 2. Lithium Carbide (CLi5), Lithium Carbide (CLi6), and the Related Effectively Hypervalent First Row Molecules, CLi5-nHn and CLi6-nHn. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. McKee, W.C.; Agarwal, J.; Schaefer, H.F., III; Schleyer, P.V.R. Covalent Hypercoordination: Can Carbon Bind Five Methyl Ligands? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7875–7878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Scherbaum, F.; Grohmann, A.; Müller, G.; Schmidbaur, H. Synthesis, Structure, and Bonding of the Cation [(C6H5)3PAu5C]. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1989, 28, 463–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dávalos, J.A.; Herrero, R.; Abboud, J.L.M.; Mó, O.; Yáñez, M. How Can a Carbon Atom Be Covalently Bound to Five Ligands? The Case of Si2 ( CH 3 ) 7 + . Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kudo, H. Observation of Hypervalent CLi6 by Knudsen-Effusion Mass Spectrometry. Nature 1992, 355, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Scherbaum, F.; Grohmann, A.; Huber, B.; Krüger, C.; Schmidbaur, H. Aurophilicity as a Consequence of Relativistic Effects:The Hexakis(triphenylphosphaneaurio)methane Dication [(Ph3PAu)6C]2⊕. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1988, 27, 1544–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hogeveen, H.; Kwant, P. Direct Observation of a Remarkably Stable Dication of Unusual Structure: ( CCH 3 ) 6 2 + . Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 1665–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Malischewski, M.; Seppelt, K. Crystal Structure Determination of the Pentagonal-Pyramidal Hexamethylbenzene Dication C6 ( CH 3 ) 6 2 + . Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 368–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Olah, G.A.; Rasul, G. Triprotonated Methane, CH 7 3 + : The Parent Heptacoordinate Carbonium Ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8503–8504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gao, Y.; Shao, N.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, G.; Zeng, X.C. [ CTi 7 2 + ]: Heptacoordinate Carbon Motif? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 2264–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, G.; Rahman, A.K.F.; Wang, B. Ab Initio Calculations of Ionic Hydrocarbon Compounds with Heptacoordinate Carbon. J. Mol. Model. 2018, 24, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yin, B.; Yang, B.; Liu, R. Octacoordinate Carbons Encaged Inside Carborane Clusters: A Density Functional Theory Investigation. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 7643–7651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Guo, J.C.; Feng, L.Y.; Dong, C.; Zhai, H.J. A Designer 32-Electron Superatomic CBe8H12 Cluster: Core-shell Geometry, Octacoordinate Carbon, and Cubic Aromaticity. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 7286–7292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, L.M.; Ding, Y.H.; Sun, C.C. Design of Sandwichlike Complexes Based on the Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Unit CAl 4 2 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 658–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, L.m.; Ding, Y.h.; Sun, C.c. Assembly and Stabilization of a Planar Tetracoordinated Carbon Radical CAl3Si: A Way To Design Spin-Based Molecular Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1900–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Luo, Q.; Zhang, X.H.; Huang, K.L.; Liu, S.Q.; Yu, Z.H.; Li, Q.S. Theoretical Studies on Novel Main Group Metallocene-like Complexes Involving Planar Hexacoordinate Carbon η6-B6 C 2 Ligand. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 2930–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, S.D.; Miao, C.Q.; Ren, G.M.; Guo, J.C. Triple-Decker Transition-Metal Complexes (CnHn)M(B6C)M(CnHn) (M = Fe, Ru, Mn, Re; n = 5, 6) Containing Planar Hexacoordinate Carbon Atoms. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 2006, 2567–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yañez, O.; Vásquez-Espinal, A.; Pino-Rios, R.; Ferraro, F.; Pan, S.; Osorio, E.; Merino, G.; Tiznado, W. Exploiting Electronic Strategies to Stabilize A Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon in Cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 12112–12115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Thirumoorthy, K.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Cooksy, A.L.; Thimmakondu, V.S. Kinetic Stability of Si2C5H2 Isomer with a Planar Tetracoordinate Carbon Atom. Chemistry 2021, 3, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula Into a Functional of the Electron Density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tao, J.; Perdew, J.P.; Staroverov, V.N.; Scuseria, G.E. Climbing the Density Functional Ladder: Nonempirical Meta–Generalized Gradient Approximation Designed for Molecules and Solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 146401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. A New Local Density Functional for Main-Group Thermochemistry, Transition Metal Bonding, Thermochemical Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 194101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chai, J.D.; Head-Gordon, M. Long-Range Corrected Hybrid Density Functionals with Damped Atom-Atom Dispersion Corrections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6615–6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Becke, A.D.; Johnson, E.R. Exchange-Hole Dipole Moment and the Dispersion Interaction. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Glendening, E.D.; Weinhold, F. Natural Resonance Theory: I. General Formalism. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 593–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schlegel, H.B.; Millam, J.M.; Iyengar, S.S.; Voth, G.A.; Daniels, A.D.; Scuseria, G.E.; Frisch, M.J. Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics: Propagating the Density Matrix with Gaussian Orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 9758–9763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16 Revision B.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  74. Coriani, S.; Haaland, A.; Helgaker, T.; Jørgensen, P. The Equilibrium Structure of Ferrocene. ChemPhysChem 2006, 7, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Goddard, W.A. Doubly Hybrid Density Functional for Accurate Descriptions of Nonbond Interactions, Thermochemistry, and Thermochemical Kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 4963–4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, I.Y.; Wu, J.; Xu, X. Extending the Reliability and Applicability of B3LYP. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3057–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Seiler, P.; Dunitz, J.D. Low-Temperature Crystallization of Orthorhombic Ferrocene: Structure Analysis at 98 K. Acta Cryst. B 1982, 38, 1741–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zubarev, D.Y.; Boldyrev, A.I. Developing Paradigms of Chemical Bonding: Adaptive Natural Density Partitioning. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 5207–5217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zubarev, D.Y.; Boldyrev, A.I. Revealing Intuitively Assessable Chemical Bonding Patterns in Organic Aromatic Molecules via Adaptive Natural Density Partitioning. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9251–9258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lu, T.; Chen, F. Multiwfn: A Multifunctional Wavefunction Analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Optimized singlet electronic state structures of (a) eclipsed-, ( 1 A 1 ) (c) gauche-, ( 1 A ) and (e) staggered-[Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 1 A g ) (Fe:orange; Si:bisque; C:gray; H:white) obtained at the ω B97X-D/def2-TZVP level of theory. Bond lengths are indicated in Å. Wiberg bond indices (in green) calculated at the same level are given in (b), (d), and (f), respectively.
Figure 1. Optimized singlet electronic state structures of (a) eclipsed-, ( 1 A 1 ) (c) gauche-, ( 1 A ) and (e) staggered-[Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + ( 1 A g ) (Fe:orange; Si:bisque; C:gray; H:white) obtained at the ω B97X-D/def2-TZVP level of theory. Bond lengths are indicated in Å. Wiberg bond indices (in green) calculated at the same level are given in (b), (d), and (f), respectively.
Chemistry 04 00074 g001
Figure 2. Chemical bonding pattern for eclipsed-[Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + (1) as obtained from AdNDP analysis. Lone-pairs (LPs), 2center-2electron (2c-2e), and various multicenter-2electron (3c-2e, 4c-2e, and 19c-2e) bonds including their occupation numbers (ONs) are shown.
Figure 2. Chemical bonding pattern for eclipsed-[Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + (1) as obtained from AdNDP analysis. Lone-pairs (LPs), 2center-2electron (2c-2e), and various multicenter-2electron (3c-2e, 4c-2e, and 19c-2e) bonds including their occupation numbers (ONs) are shown.
Chemistry 04 00074 g002
Figure 3. Time versus energy plot of isomer 1 of [Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + obtained from the AIMD simulation carried out at 298 K and 1 atm pressure for 2000 fs at the ω B97XD/def2-TZVP level.
Figure 3. Time versus energy plot of isomer 1 of [Fe(Si 2 - η 5 -C 5 H 2 ) 2 ] 2 + obtained from the AIMD simulation carried out at 298 K and 1 atm pressure for 2000 fs at the ω B97XD/def2-TZVP level.
Chemistry 04 00074 g003
Table 1. ZPVE-corrected relative energies ( Δ E 0 ) and thermally corrected Gibbs energies ( Δ G 298.15 ) of 2 and 3 relative to the singlet electronic state of 1 ( 1 A 1 ) using def2-TZVP basis set a .
Table 1. ZPVE-corrected relative energies ( Δ E 0 ) and thermally corrected Gibbs energies ( Δ G 298.15 ) of 2 and 3 relative to the singlet electronic state of 1 ( 1 A 1 ) using def2-TZVP basis set a .
1 (Eclipsed)2 (Gauche)3 (Staggered)
Quintet bSingletQuintetSingletQuintet
Functional Δ E 0 Δ G 298.15 Δ E 0 Δ G 298.15 Δ E 0 Δ G 298.15 Δ E 0 Δ G 298.15 Δ E 0 Δ G 298.15
B3LYP−29.14−39.04−2.34−3.16−36.36−51.01−2.47−4.59−39.25−54.01
B3LYP-D3BJ−7.90−19.592.441.38−13.04−30.408.245.51−2.91−22.72
M06-L94.5882.7716.7416.7588.7273.8440.3437.8985.9369.80
TPSSh95.6082.1713.3012.5789.2472.2030.7828.1486.9069.16
TPSSh-D3BJ118.33108.3413.5413.53113.9695.8832.2931.16112.5793.01
ω B97X-D0.31−4.17−3.062.04−5.11−13.61−2.78−1.21−7.82−15.63
a All values are in kJ mol−1. b Transition state or second-order saddle-point at this level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shajan, S.; Guo, J.-C.; Sinjari, A.; Thirumoorthy, K.; Thimmakondu, V.S. Pentacoordinate Carbon Atoms in a Ferrocene Dication Derivative—[Fe(Si2-η5-C5H2)2]2+. Chemistry 2022, 4, 1092-1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040074

AMA Style

Shajan S, Guo J-C, Sinjari A, Thirumoorthy K, Thimmakondu VS. Pentacoordinate Carbon Atoms in a Ferrocene Dication Derivative—[Fe(Si2-η5-C5H2)2]2+. Chemistry. 2022; 4(4):1092-1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shajan, Shilpa, Jin-Chang Guo, Aland Sinjari, Krishnan Thirumoorthy, and Venkatesan S. Thimmakondu. 2022. "Pentacoordinate Carbon Atoms in a Ferrocene Dication Derivative—[Fe(Si2-η5-C5H2)2]2+" Chemistry 4, no. 4: 1092-1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040074

APA Style

Shajan, S., Guo, J.-C., Sinjari, A., Thirumoorthy, K., & Thimmakondu, V. S. (2022). Pentacoordinate Carbon Atoms in a Ferrocene Dication Derivative—[Fe(Si2-η5-C5H2)2]2+. Chemistry, 4(4), 1092-1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040074

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop