Global Models of Smart Cities and Potential IoT Applications: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The recurrence of the city’s appearance in more than one comprehensive study to analyze smart city projects.
- The availability of an official website or a special report for the city containing smart projects that have been implemented or are being implemented in the city.
- The same project within the smart city must have more than one source in the absence of an official website or report for the city.
- Cities should be as representative as possible of most geographical areas and different cultural and economic characteristics.
- Considering that the experiments under study include models for both directions of smart cities, existing cities that have already been developed to transform into smart cities, and new cities that already exist from first, second and third generation cities.
2. Smart City
- Smart Transportation: utilize IoT sensors to collect data on traffic flow, parking, and public transportation, optimizing routes and reducing congestion. Ultimately, this data could also be used to improve safety by detecting and alerting drivers of potential accidents [19].
- Smart Waste Management: utilize IoT sensors to monitor waste levels in trash cans and dumpsters, optimizing garbage collection routes and reducing costs [22]. Predictive analytics: use machine learning algorithms to predict the amount of waste generated in different areas and schedule waste collection accordingly [23]. Recycling robots: deploy robots to sort and separate recyclable materials from general waste [24]. Smart bins: install smart bins that use sensors to detect when they are full and send alerts to waste collection teams [25]. Waste-to-energy systems: convert waste into energy through incineration, gasification, or anaerobic digestion [25].
- Public Safety: use IoT sensors to monitor crime and traffic violations, as well as detecting natural disasters and emergencies, enabling faster response times and better disaster management [26].
- Smart Water Management: use IoT sensors to monitor and optimize water usage in buildings and public spaces, reducing waste and conserving resources [27]. Smart water systems can be used by water utilities, businesses, and homeowners to monitor and control water usage. Overall, smart water systems offer a number of benefits that can help to conserve water, save money, and improve water management.
- Smart Health: use of connected devices and sensors to monitor and manage various aspects of health. These devices can collect and transmit data to healthcare providers, caregivers, or the individuals themselves, allowing for better tracking and management of health conditions and improving overall health outcomes [28].
- Smart Government: use of technology and data to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of government services and operations. It involves the integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) into government processes and services, with the aim of enhancing transparency, citizen engagement, and overall governance [29,30].
- Smart Buildings: use of advanced technologies and systems to enhance their functionality, efficiency, and sustainability. These buildings are equipped with a wide range of sensors, control systems, and other IoT devices that enable them to collect and analyze data about their environment and occupants in real time [31].
- Smart Manufacturing: utilize advanced technologies such as the IoT, big data analytics, AI, robotics, and automation to optimize the manufacturing process. It aims to create a more efficient and flexible manufacturing system that can adapt to changing market demands, reduce costs, and improve product quality [32].
- Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV): a type of aircraft that is operated remotely without a human pilot on board. UAVs can be either controlled by a human operator on the ground or can be programmed to operate autonomously. They are commonly used for military, commercial, scientific, and recreational purposes and have become increasingly popular in recent years due to advances in technology and lower costs [33].
- Robotics: robotics and the Internet of Things (IoT) play a crucial role in shaping smart city applications by integrating physical devices and intelligent systems with the city’s infrastructure [34]. These technologies enable the development of innovative solutions to improve efficiency, sustainability, and the overall quality of life for citizens. These are just a few examples of how robotics and IoT technologies are transforming urban environments into smarter, more sustainable, and efficient cities [34,35]. As technology continues to advance, we can expect even more innovative applications to emerge, improving the way we live and interact with our surroundings.
2.1. Smart Transportation
2.1.1. Logistic Services
- Asset Tracking
- 2.
- Condition Monitoring
- 3.
- Predictive Maintenance
2.1.2. Electric Vehicles
- Remote monitoring:
- 2.
- Smart charging:
- 3.
- Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) communication:
- 4.
- Predictive maintenance:
- 5.
- Driver behavior monitoring:
2.1.3. Smart Parking
- Smart vehicle counting
- 2.
- Passenger services
- 3.
- Fleet management
2.2. Smart Energy
2.2.1. Smart Gri
2.2.2. Demand Response
2.2.3. Distributed Energy Resources (DERs)
2.2.4. Grid Monitoring
2.2.5. Power Quality Monitoring
2.2.6. Smart Lighting
2.2.7. Energy Storage
2.3. Smart Waste Management
2.3.1. Smart Waste Bins
2.3.2. Route Optimization
2.3.3. Environmental Monitoring
2.3.4. Recycling Management
2.3.5. Public Awareness and Education
2.3.6. Data Analytics
2.3.7. Remote Monitoring and Maintenance
2.4. Public Safety
2.4.1. Traffic Management
- Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS)
- 2.
- Automated Traffic Enforcement (ATE)
- 3.
- Emergency Vehicle Prevention (EVP)
- 4.
- Pedestrian Detection Systems (PDS)
- 5.
- Variable Message Signs (VMS)
2.4.2. Emergency Response
- Dispatch Systems
- 2.
- Incident Management Systems
- 3.
- Mapping and GIS Applications
- 4.
- Emergency Mobile Apps
- 5.
- Social Media Monitoring Tools
2.4.3. Public Health Monitoring
- Disease Surveillance
- 2.
- Emergency Management
- 3.
- Environmental Monitoring
- 4.
- Food Safety
- 5.
- Public Health Communication
2.4.4. Infrastructure Monitoring
- Bridge safety monitoring
- 2.
- Building safety monitoring
- 3.
- Road safety monitoring
- 4.
- Natural disaster monitoring
- 5.
- Asset tracking
2.4.5. Tracking Emergency Response Vehicles
- Tracking Valuable Equipment
- 2.
- Tracking Prisoners
- 3.
- Tracking Stolen Vehicles
- 4.
- Tracking Evidence
2.5. Smart Water Management
2.6. Smart Health
2.6.1. Tracking and Monitoring
2.6.2. Authentication and Identification
2.6.3. Data Collection
- Periodic reporting
- On demand reporting
- Scheduled reporting
- Event-driven reporting
2.7. Smart Government
2.8. Smart Building
2.8.1. Predictive Maintenance
2.8.2. Digital Twins
2.8.3. Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
2.8.4. Big Data Analytics
2.9. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)
2.9.1. Agriculture
- Crop Monitoring:
- 2.
- Precision Agriculture:
- 3.
- Crop Spraying:
- 4.
- Mapping:
- 5.
- Irrigation Management:
2.9.2. Disaster Response
- Search and Rescue:
- 2.
- Disaster Mapping and Assessment:
- 3.
- Delivery of Aid and Supplies:
- 4.
- Communication Support:
2.9.3. Infrastructure Inspection
- Bridge inspections:
- 2.
- Power line inspections:
- 3.
- Wind turbine inspections:
- 4.
- Roof inspections:
2.9.4. Delivery Services
- Last-mile delivery:
- 2.
- Medical supply delivery:
- 3.
- Retail delivery:
- 4.
- Parcel delivery:
2.10. Robotics
2.10.1. Automated Transportation
2.10.2. Infrastructure Maintenance
2.10.3. Surveillance and Security
2.10.4. Environmental Monitoring
2.10.5. Agriculture and Urban Farming
2.10.6. Healthcare Assistance
2.10.7. Disaster Response
2.10.8. Education and Entertainment
2.10.9. Tourism
2.10.10. Smart Home Assistants
3. Smart City Communication Systems
3.1. Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWANs)
3.1.1. LORAWAN
3.1.2. NB-IoT (Narrowband IoT)
3.1.3. LTE-M (Long Term Evolution for Machines)
3.2. Fourth Generation (4G)
3.2.1. Faster Data Speeds
3.2.2. Improved Reliability
3.2.3. Increased Capacity
3.2.4. Use Cases of 4G LTE
- VoLTE (Voice over LTE): VoLTE is a technology that allows users to make and receive calls over a 4G LTE network. This provides better voice quality and lower latency than traditional cellular networks [3].
- Mobile gaming: 4G LTE is ideal for mobile gaming, as it can provide the fast data speeds and low latency that are required for smooth gameplay [185].
- IoT (Internet of Things): 4G LTE is used to connect a wide variety of IoT devices, such as smart home devices, wearables, and industrial sensors. This allows these devices to communicate with each other and with the cloud [25].
3.3. Fifth Generation (5G)
3.3.1. Faster Speeds
3.3.2. Lower Latency
3.3.3. Greater Capacity
3.4. Sixth Generation
4. Examples of Smart Cities
4.1. Smart City 1.0
4.2. Smart City 2.0
4.3. Smart City 3.0
4.4. Smart City 4.0
4.5. Global Smart Cities
4.5.1. Singapore
- IoT sensors: Singapore has installed a large number of IoT sensors across the city to collect real-time data on various parameters such as traffic flow, air quality, and energy consumption. This data is then analyzed to identify patterns and trends, which helps authorities to make informed decisions [179,204].
- Smart nation initiative: the Singapore government has launched a smart nation initiative to leverage technology to improve the lives of its citizens. The initiative includes various projects such as the development of a national digital identity system, a cashless payment system, and a national sensor network [204].
4.5.2. Barcelona
- Citizen engagement: Barcelona has implemented various initiatives to engage its citizens and encourage them to participate in the city’s decision-making process. For example, the city has developed a digital platform called “DECIDIM” that allows citizens to propose and vote on ideas for improving the city [208,210].
4.5.3. Amsterdam
- Smart mobility: Amsterdam has developed an advanced mobility system that integrates various modes of transport such as bicycles, electric vehicles, and public transport. The city has also implemented a smart parking system that helps drivers find available parking spots using sensors and mobile apps [213,214].
- Sustainable energy: Amsterdam has a strong focus on sustainable energy and has implemented various initiatives to reduce energy consumption and increase the use of renewable energy sources. For example, the city has developed a district heating system that uses waste heat from industrial processes to heat homes, buildings, and companies [213,215].
- Circular economy: Amsterdam is committed to becoming a circular economy, which means reducing waste and reusing materials as much as possible. The city has implemented various initiatives to promote circular practices, such as a recycling program for construction materials and a bike-sharing program that uses recycled bicycles [213,216].
4.5.4. Copenhagen
- Sustainable urban planning: Copenhagen has adopted a strong focus on sustainable urban planning. The city promotes compact development, mixed land use, and efficient transportation systems. It prioritizes cycling infrastructure, pedestrian-friendly streets, and public transportation, which contribute to reduced carbon emissions and improved mobility [209,218].
- Renewable energy: Copenhagen aims to become carbon-neutral by 2025 and has made significant progress in utilizing renewable energy sources. The city has implemented wind turbines, district heating systems, and smart grid technologies to optimize energy production, distribution, and consumption [215,219].
- Data-driven decision making: Copenhagen utilizes data and digital technologies to make informed decisions and improve city services. The city collects and analyzes data on various aspects, including energy consumption, transportation patterns, and air quality, to identify areas for improvement and implement targeted solutions [211,222,223].
- Citizen engagement: Copenhagen actively engages citizens in decision-making processes and encourages citizen participation through digital platforms. The city utilizes digital tools for public consultations, feedback collection, and collaborative problem-solving, fostering a sense of ownership and promoting a participatory approach [210,222].
- Smart and connected infrastructure: Copenhagen leverages smart technologies to optimize the functioning of infrastructure. This includes smart street lighting, waste management systems, and sensor networks for monitoring environmental conditions, allowing for timely interventions and resource optimization [206,224].
- Innovation ecosystem: Copenhagen has a thriving innovation ecosystem, with a focus on startups, research institutions, and industry collaborations. The city supports entrepreneurship, technology incubators, and innovation hubs, fostering the development and implementation of smart city solutions. Copenhagen’s commitment to sustainability, use of technology for data-driven decision-making, and citizen-centric approach contribute to its reputation as a smart and livable city [224,225].
4.5.5. Tokyo
4.5.6. Dubai
- Sustainable energy: Dubai has a strong focus on sustainable energy and has implemented various initiatives to reduce energy consumption and increase the use of renewable energy sources. For example, the city has developed a large-scale solar power plant and a district cooling system that uses waste heat to cool buildings [215,229].
- Smart government: Dubai has implemented various initiatives to create a smart government, including the development of a government services portal and the implementation of e-voting systems [229]. Overall, these cities demonstrate how smart technology can be used to improve quality of life, reduce energy consumption, and enhance sustainability [230].
4.5.7. NEOM
- Technology and innovation: NEOM plans to leverage cutting-edge technologies and innovations to create a smart city ecosystem. It aims to be a hub for research and development, attracting tech companies, startups, and entrepreneurs. The city intends to implement advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and automation [206,231].
- Economic diversification: NEOM is part of Saudi Arabia’s broader Vision 2030 initiative, which aims to reduce the country’s dependence on oil and diversify its economy. NEOM seeks to attract domestic and international investments, foster entrepreneurship, and create job opportunities across various industries [216,231].
- Quality of life: the project emphasizes improving the quality of life for residents and visitors. NEOM aims to provide world-class infrastructure, healthcare facilities, education, cultural amenities, and recreational spaces. The city plans to promote a vibrant and inclusive community that offers a high standard of living [231,234].
- Strategic location: NEOM’s location along the Red Sea coast provides opportunities for trade, logistics, and tourism. It aims to connect Asia, Europe, and Africa through its strategic position, enabling the development of a thriving economic zone [220]. It is important to note that NEOM is still in the development stage, and many aspects of the project are yet to be fully realized. As the project progresses, it will be essential to assess its implementation, sustainability efforts, economic impact, and the overall achievement of its goals.
4.5.8. New Administrative Capital
5. Smart City Evaluation Metrics
5.1. Evaluation Metrics
- Infrastructure
- 2.
- Governance and Policy
- 3.
- Energy Efficiency
- 4.
- Mobility and Transportation
- 5.
- Environment and Sustainability
- 6.
- Public Services and Civic Engagement
- 7.
- Data Management and Privacy
- Data Management
- Privacy
- 8.
- Quality of Life (QoL)
- Economy: the city’s GDP per capita, unemployment rate, and job growth rate [225].
- Healthcare: the quality of the city’s healthcare system, life expectancy, and infant mortality rate [123].
- Education: the quality of the city’s schools, universities, and adult education programs [175].
- Environment: the city’s air quality, water quality, and green space [230].
- Safety: the city’s crime rate, traffic accident rate, and fire rate [212].
- Transportation: the city’s public transportation system, roads, and airports [214].
- 9.
- Economic Development
5.2. Smart Cities’ Evaluation
- Singapore is a leading smart city in terms of its use of technology to improve the lives of its citizens. It has a well-developed smart transportation system, including a metro system, bus network, and public bike sharing program. The city also has a number of smart buildings and homes that are equipped with sensors and other technology to monitor energy use and provide residents with information about their surroundings.
- Barcelona is another city that is making great strides in the field of smart city development. The city has a number of innovative projects underway, such as a smart lighting system that uses sensors to adjust the brightness of streetlights based on traffic levels and a smart water management system that uses sensors to monitor water usage and leaks.
- Amsterdam is a city that is known for its commitment to sustainability. The city has a number of smart city initiatives in place that are designed to reduce its environmental impact. These initiatives include a smart waste management system, a smart water management system, and a smart transportation system.
- Copenhagen is another city that is making great strides in the field of sustainability. The city has a number of smart city initiatives in place that are designed to reduce its environmental impact. These initiatives include a smart waste management system, a smart water management system, and a smart transportation system.
- Tokyo is a city that is known for its technological prowess. The city has a number of smart city initiatives in place that are designed to improve the lives of its citizens. These initiatives include a smart transportation system, a smart water management system, and a smart healthcare system.
- Dubai is a city that is known for its ambition. The city has a number of ambitious smart city projects underway, such as a smart transportation system, a smart water management system, and a smart healthcare system.
- NEOM. The city is designed to be a hub for innovation and technology. NEOM has a number of ambitious projects underway, such as a smart transportation system, a smart water management system, and a smart healthcare system.
- NAC is a new smart city that is being built in Egypt. The city is designed to be a hub for government and business and has a number of ambitious projects underway, such as a smart transportation system, a smart water management system, and a smart healthcare system.
5.3. Smart Cities’ Implementation Challenges
5.3.1. Funding
5.3.2. Infrastructure
5.3.3. Data Privacy
5.3.4. Security
5.3.5. Lack of Coordination
5.3.6. Public Acceptance
5.4. Recommendations
5.4.1. Finding New Sources of Funding
5.4.2. Building New Infrastructure
5.4.3. Protecting Data Privacy
5.4.4. Securing Smart City Technologies
5.4.5. Building Consensus
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Statista. Number of Internet of Things (IoT) Connected Devices Worldwide from 2019 to 2023, with Forecasts from 2022 to 2030. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1183457/iot-connected-devices-worldwide/ (accessed on 15 May 2023).
- Global IoT Market Size. IoT Analytics. 2023. Available online: https://iot-analytics.com/iot-market-size/ (accessed on 15 May 2023).
- Hassebo, A. Commercial 4G LTE Cellular Networks for Supporting Emerging Mission-Critical IoT Applications; ProQuest Dissertations Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Tealab, M.; Hassebo, A.; Dabour, A.; AbdelAziz, M. Smart Cities Digital transformation and 5G—ICT Architecture. In Proceedings of the 2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York, NY, USA, 28–31 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hassebo, A.; Rezk, A.; Ali, M.A. A Hybrid Uplink Scheduling Approach for Supporting Mission-Critical Smart Grid Applications in Commercial 4G Cellular Networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 9th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York, NY, USA, 8–10 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Stallings, W. 5g Wireless: A Comprehensive Introduction; Addison-Wesley Professional: Boston, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, N.A.; Taha, A.M.; Hassanein, H.S. LTE, LTE-Advanced and Wi MAX Towards IMT-Advanced Networks; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. World Population Prospects 2022; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, The United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects 2018; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, The United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Keshav, K.; Pramod, B.; Vineet, K. Smart Cities Market Statistics: 2030; Allied Market Research: Pune, India, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Lanvin, B. Smart City Index 2023; IMD World Competitiveness Center (WCC): Lausanne, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hassebo, A.; Obaidat, M.; Ali, M.A. Commercial 4G LTE Cellular Networks for Supporting Emerging IoT Applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 6 February 2018–5 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Hassebo, A. The Road to 6G, Vision, Drivers, Trends, and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 12th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 26–29 January 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Hassebo, A.; Ali, M.A. Robust Cellular Connectivity-Based Smart LED Street Lighting System: A Platform for Innovative Mission Critical Smart City IoT Applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York, NY, USA, 28–31 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Achieng, M.; Ogundaini, O.; Makola, D.; Iyamu, T. The African Perspective of a Smart City: Conceptualisation of Context and Relevance. In Proceedings of the IST-Africa 2021 Conference Proceedings, South Africa, South Africa, 10–14 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Joo, Y.M.; Tan, T.B. Smart Cities in Asia: An Introduction. In Smart Cities in Asia: Governing Development in the Era of Hyper-Connectivity; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Garrido-Marijuan, A.; Pargova, Y.; Wilson, C. The Making of a Smart City: Best Practices Across Europe; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Shahzad, F.; Rehman, S.u.; Javed, A.; Jalil, Z.; Bin-Zikria, Y. Future Smart Cities: Requirements, Emerging Technologies, Applications, Challenges, and Future Aspects. Cities 2021, 129, 103794. [Google Scholar]
- Oladimeji, D.; Gupta, K.; Kose, N.A.; Gundogan, K.; Ge, L.; Liang, F. Smart Transportation: An Overview of Technologies and Applications. Sensors 2023, 23, 3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ceglia, F.; Marrasso, E.; Pallotta, G.; Roselli, C.; Sasso, M. The State of the Art of Smart Energy Communities: A Systematic Review of Strengths and Limits. Energies 2022, 15, 3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassebo, A. xIoT-Based Converged 5G and ICT Infrastructure. In Electric Grid Modernization; Intech Open: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Sosunova, I.; Porras, J. IoT-Enabled Smart Waste Management Systems for Smart Cities: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 73326–73363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihigo, I.N.; Zennaro, M.; Uwitonze, A.; Rwigema, J.; Rovai, M. On-Device IoT-Based Predictive Maintenance Analytics Model: Comparing TinyLSTM and TinyModel from Edge Impulse. Sensors 2022, 22, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikram, S.T.; Mohanraj, V.; Ramachandran, S.; Balakrishnan, A. An Intelligent Waste Management Application Using IoT and a Genetic Algorithm—Fuzzy Inference System. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, N.; Al-wesabi, O.A.; Mohammed, B.A.; Al-Mekhlafi, Z.G.; Alazmi, M.; Alsaffar, M.; Baklizi, M.; Sumari, P. IoT-Based Waste Management System in Formal and Informal Public Areas in Mecca. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraga-Lamas, P.; Fernández-Caramés, T.M.; Suárez-Albela, M.; Castedo, L.; González-López, M. A Review on Internet of Things for Defense and Public Safety. Sensors 2016, 16, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlGhamdi, R.; Sharma, S.K. IoT-Based Smart Water Management Systems for Residential Buildings in Saudi Arabia. Processes 2022, 10, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, S.; Yang, W.; Le Grange, J.M.; Wang, P.; Huang, W.; Ye, Z. Smart healthcare: Making medical care more intelligent. Glob. Health J. 2019, 3, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anthopoulos, L.; Reddick, C.G. Smart City and Smart Government: Synonymous or Complementary? In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, Geneva, Switzerland, 11–16 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Nastjuk, I.; Trang, S.; Papageorgiou, E.I. Smart cities and smart governance models for future cities. Electron. Mark. 2022, 32, 1917–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.; Yoon, Y.; Lee, J.; Mago, P.J.; Lee, K.; Cho, H. Design and Implementation of Smart Buildings: A Review of Current Research Trend. Energies 2022, 15, 4278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Department of Energy. National Smart Manufacturing Strategic Plan; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2022.
- Mohsan, S.A.H.; Khan, M.A.; Noor, F.; Ullah, I.; Alsharif, M.H. Towards the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Comprehensive Review. Drones 2022, 6, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golubchikov, O.; Thornbush, M. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Smart City Strategies and Planned Smart Development. Smart Cities 2020, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artsen, A.M.; Burkett, L.S.; Duvvuri, U.; Bonidie, M. Surgeon satisfaction and outcomes of tele-proctoring for robotic gynecologic surgery. J. Robot. Surg. 2021, 16, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Syed, A.; Sierra-Sosa, D.; Kumar, A.; Elmaghraby, A. IoT in Smart Cities: A Survey of Technologies, Practices and Challenges. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 429–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gracias, J.; Parnell, G.; Specking, E.; Pohl, E.; Buchanan, R. Smart Cities-A Structured Literature Review. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dameri, R.P. Smart City Implementation; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Statista. Passenger Cars—Worldwide. 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/outlook/mmo/passenger-cars/worldwide (accessed on 17 May 2023).
- Masek, P.; Masek, J.; Frantik, P.; Fujdiak, R.; Ometov, A.; Hosek, J.; Andreev, S.; Mlynek, P.; Misurec, J. A Harmonized Per-spective on Transportation Management in Smart Cities: The Novel IoT-Driven Environment for Road Traffic Modeling. Sensors 2016, 16, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zantalis, F.; Koulouras, G.; Karabetsos, S.; Kandris, D. A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation. Future Internet 2019, 11, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadłubek, M.; Thalassinos, E.; Domagała, J.; Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S. Intelligent Transportation System Applications and Logistics Resources for Logistics Customer Service in Road Freight Transport Enterprises. Energies 2022, 15, 4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominguez, M.T. Transportation Asset Management Plan; NYS DoT: Albany, NY, USA, 2019.
- Kostrzewski, M.; Melnik, R. Condition Monitoring of Rail Transport Systems: A Bibliometric Performance Analysis and Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ersöz, O.Ö.; Inal, A.F.; Aktepe, A.; Türker, A.K.; Ersöz, S. A Systematic Literature Review of the Predictive Maintenance from Transportation Systems Aspect. Sustainability 2022, 14, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meldert, B.V.; Boeck, L.D. Introducing Autonomous Vehicles in Logistics: A Review from a Broad Perspective; Faculty of Business and Economics, KU Leuven: Leuven, Belgium, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- IRENA. Electric Vehicles Technology Brief; International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA): Masdar City, United Arab Emirates, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Muller, J.; Fregin, A.; Dietmayer, K. Multi-Camera System for Traffic Light Detection: About Camera Setup and Mapping of Detections. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Yokohama, Japan, 16–19 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
- IEA. Global Electric Vehicle Outlook 2022; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, M.A.; El-Sharkawy, M.R.; Kim, Y.-C. Remote Monitoring of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in Smart Campus Parking Lot. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2020, 8, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, A.; Cappellucci, J.; Schayowitz, A.; White, E.; Heinrich, A.; Cost, E. Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Trends from the Alternative Fueling Station Locator: First Quarter 2022; National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- US DoT. Charging Forward; US DoT: Washington, DC, USA, 2022.
- Song, N.; Kwak, B. International Standard Trend of Vehicle to Grid (V2G) Communication Interface for Wireless Communication and RPT. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific), Seogwipo, Republic of Korea, 8–10 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Conti, M.; Donadel, D.; Poovendran, R.; Turrin, F. EVExchange: A Relay Attack on Electric Vehicle Charging System. In European Symposium on Research in Computer Security; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 488–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massaro, A.; Selicato, S.; Galiano, A. Predictive Maintenance of Bus Fleet by Intelligent Smart Electronic Board Implementing Artificial Intelligence. IoT 2019, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campos-Ferreira, A.E.; Lozoya-Santos, J.d.J.; Tudon-Martinez, J.C.; Mendoza, R.A.R.; Vargas-Martínez, A.; Morales-Menendez, R.; Lozano, D. Vehicle and Driver Monitoring System Using On-Board and Remote Sensors. Sensors 2023, 23, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DoT. NYC Mobility Report; NYC Department of Transportation (DoT): Washington DC, USA, 2019.
- DoT. Central Business District Tolling Program (CBDTP); NYS-DoT: NYC, NY, USA, 2022.
- Kotb, A.O. Smart Parking: Guidance, Monitoring and Reservations; University of Liverpool: Liverpool, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- NYU Rudin Center for Transportation Policy. Urban Mobility in the 21st Century; NYU Rudin Center for Transportation Policy: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Statista. Population Projections for the United States from 2015 to 2060. 2020. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/183481/united-states-population-projection/ (accessed on 17 May 2023).
- Green Car Reports. 2014. Available online: https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1093560_1-2-billion-vehicles-on-worlds-roads-now-2-billion-by-2035-report (accessed on 22 May 2023).
- Autonomous Vehicle Market Statistics 2030. Allied Market Reserach, 2022. Available online: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/autonomous-vehicle-market (accessed on 23 May 2023).
- Sacks, M. In Two Years, There Could Be 10 Million Self-Driving Cars on the Roads. Available online: https://stanfordmag.org/contents/in-two-years-there-could-be-10-million-self-driving-cars-on-the-roads (accessed on 27 May 2023).
- Subramanya, K.; Kermanshachi, S.; Pamidimukkala, A. Evaluation of E-Ticketing Technology in Construction of Highway Projects: A Systematic Review of Adoption Levels, Benefits, Limitations and Strategies. Front. Built Environ. 2022, 8, 890024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivan, C.; Balag, R. An Initial Approach for a NFC M-Ticketing Urban Transport System. J. Comput. Commun. 2015, 3, 42–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Morais, H.; Sousa, T.; Lind, M. Electric vehicle fleet management in smart grids: A review of services, optimization and control aspects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 1207–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas, B.; Bolaños, C.; Salazar-Cabrera, R.; Ramírez-González, G.; Cruz, Á.P.D.L.; Molina, J.M.M. Fleet Management and Control System for Medium-Sized Cities Based in Intelligent Transportation Systems: From Review to Proposal in a City. Electronics 2020, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassebo, A.; Mohamed, A.A.; Dorsinville, R.; Ali, M.A. 5G-based Converged Electric Power Grid and ICT Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 5G World Forum (5GWF), Silicon Valley, CA, USA, 9–11 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Stanelyte, D.; Radziukyniene, N.; Radziukynas, V. Overview of Demand-Response Services: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hargroves, K.; James, B.; Lane, J.; Newman, P. The Role of Distributed Energy Resources and Associated Business Models in the Decentralised Energy Transition: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazhar, T.; Irfan, H.M.; Haq, I.; Ullah, I.; Ashraf, M.; Al Shloul, T.; Ghadi, Y.Y.; Imran; Elkamchouchi, D.H. Analysis of Challenges and Solutions of IoT in Smart Grids Using AI and Machine Learning Techniques: A Review. Electronics 2023, 12, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2018. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html (accessed on 23 May 2023).
- EPA—United States Environmental Protection Agency. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions (accessed on 23 May 2023).
- Jansen, E.R. GroningenPhilips Lighting; Philips Lighting Corporate Communications: Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Siddiqi, M.H.; Alruwaili, M.; Tarimer, İ.; Karadağ, B.C.; Alhwaiti, Y.; Khan, F. Development of a Smart Signalization for Emergency Vehicles. Sensors 2023, 23, 4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gellings, C.W. The Smart Grid: Enabling Energy Efficiency and Demand Response; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Alonaizi, S.Y.; Manuel, P. IoT-Based Smart Government Enablers: An Exploration of Governments’ Experiments. In Proceedings of the 2021 Fifth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems Security and Sustainability (WorldS4), London, UK, 29–30 July 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Cheema, S.M.; Hannan, A.; Pires, I.M. Smart Waste Management and Classification Systems Using Cutting Edge Approach. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guna, J.; Horvat, K.P.; Podjed, D. People-Centred Development of a Smart Waste Bin. Sensors 2022, 22, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lozano; Caridad, J.; Paz, J.F.D.; González, G.V.; Bajo, J. Smart Waste Collection System with Low Consumption LoRaWAN Nodes and Route Optimization. Sensors 2018, 18, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lingaraju, A.; Niranjanamurthy, M.; Bose, P.; Acharya, B.; Gerogiannis, V.; Kanavos, A.; Manika, S. IoT-Based Waste Seg-regation with Location Tracking and Air Quality Monitoring for Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, E.; Sahin, F.A.; Redondi, A.E.C.; Bolzan, P.; Bianchini, M.; Maffei, S. A 5G-Enabled Smart Waste Management System for University Campus. Sensors 2021, 21, 8278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debrah, J.; Vidal, D.; Dinis, M. Raising Awareness on Solid Waste Management through Formal Education for Sustaina-bility: A Developing Countries Evidence Review. Recylcling 2021, 6, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, S.; Mubarak, S.; Du, J.T.; Wibowo, S. Forecasting the Status of Municipal Waste in Smart Bins Using Deep Learning. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veloz-Cherrez, D.; Lozada-Yanez, R.; Mayorga, J.R.P.; Panchi, J. Smart Waste Monitoring System as an Initiative to Develop a Digital Territory in Riobamba City. Information 2020, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciaburro, G.; Iannace, G. Improving Smart Cities Safety Using Sound Events Detection Based on Deep Neural Network Algorithms. Informatics 2020, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, T. Cloud-Based IoT Applications and Their Roles in Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 1196–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lilhore, U.K.; Imoize, A.L.; Li, C.-T.; Simaiya, S.; Pani, S.K.; Goyal, N.; Kumar, A.; Lee, C.-C. Design and Implementation of an ML and IoT Based Adaptive Traffic-Management System for Smart Cities. Sensors 2022, 22, 2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foremski, P.; Nowak, S.; Fröhlich, P.; Hernández-Ramos, J.L.; Baldini, G. Autopolicy: Automated Traffic Policing for Improved IoT Network Security. Sensors 2020, 20, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toutouh, J.; Alba, E. A Low Cost IoT Cyber-Physical System for Vehicle and Pedestrian Tracking in a Smart Campus. Sensors 2022, 22, 6585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lukasik, D.; Hale, D.; Ma, J.; Shibley, P.; Malone, T.; Chandler, A.; Cleary, C.; Matout, N.; Adebisi, A. Enhancing Active Transportation and Demand Management (ATDM) with Advanced and Emerging Technologies and Data Sources; US Department of Transportation (DoT): Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
- Ouallane, A.A.; Bahnasse, A.; Bakali, A.; Talea, M. Overview of Road Traffic Management Solutions based on IoT and AI. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 198, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humayun, M.; Almufareh, M.F.; Jhanjhi, N.Z. Autonomous Traffic System for Emergency Vehicles. Electronics 2022, 11, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, S.A.E.; AlShalfan, K.A. Intelligent Traffic Management System Based on the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). J. Adv. Transp. 2021, 2021, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazargani, J.S.; Sadeghi-Niaraki, A.; Choi, S.-M. A Survey of GIS and IoT Integration: Applications and Architecture. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nellore, K.; Hancke, G.P. Traffic Management for Emergency Vehicle Priority Based on Visual Sensing. Sensors 2016, 16, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NPSTC. Public Safety Internet of Things (IoT) Use Case Report and Assessment Attributes; NPSTC Technology and Broadband Committee—National Public Safety Telecommunications Council: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Franchi, F.; Marotta, A.; Rinaldi, C.; Graziosi, F.; Fratocchi, L.; Parisse, M. What Can 5G Do for Public Safety? Structural Health Monitoring and Earthquake Early Warning Scenarios. Sensors 2022, 22, 3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kostkova, P.; Saigí-Rubió, F.; Eguia, H.; Borbolla, D.; Verschuuren, M.; Hamilton, C.; Azzopardi-Muscat, N.; Novillo-Ortiz, D. Data and Digital Solutions to Support Surveillance Strategies in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Digit. Health 2021, 3, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Kahtani, M.S.; Khan, F.; Taekeun, W. Application of Internet of Things and Sensors in Healthcare. Sensors 2022, 22, 5738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajagopal, S.; Lyngdoh, D.C.; Anathapadmanabhan, U.K.; Soangra, R.; Vasan, N. IoT-enabled Solutions for Environmental Monitoring in Hospitals. Open Biomed. Eng. J. 2023, 17, e187412072301020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H. Artificial Intelligence in Food Safety: A Decade Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Foods 2023, 12, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunasekeran, D.V.; Tseng, R.M.W.W.; Tham, Y.; Wong, T.Y. Applications of digital health for public health responses to COVID-19: A systematic scoping review of artificial intelligence, telehealth and related technologies. Nat. Partn. J. 2021, 4, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García, L.; Garcia-Sanchez, A.; Asorey-Cacheda, R.; Garcia-Haro, J.; Zúñiga-Cañón, C. Smart Air Quality Monitoring IoT-Based Infrastructure for Industrial Environments. Sensors 2022, 22, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.-M.; Yang, M.-T. Design a Smart Control Strategy to Implement an Intelligent Energy Safety and Management System. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Networks 2014, 10, 312392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michel, C.; Keller, S. Advancing Ground-Based Radar Processing for Bridge Infrastructure Monitoring. Sensors 2021, 21, 2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raoa, A.S.; Radanovicb, M.; Liu, Y.; Hu, S.; Fang, Y.; Khoshelham, K.; Palaniswamia, M.; Ngo, T. Real-time Monitoring of Construction Sites: Sensors, Methods, and Applications. Autom. Constr. 2021, 136, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Zhu, J.; Bu, T.; Gao, X. Monitoring and Identification of Road Construction Safety Factors via UAV. Sensors 2022, 22, 8797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, M.; Yang, C.; Li, Y. Big Data in Natural Disaster Management: A Review. Geosciences 2018, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, R.; Ejaz, W. Internet of Things-Based On-Demand Rental Asset Tracking and Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT), New York, NY, USA, 4–6 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz-Garcés, I.; Andrade, R.O.; Sanchez-Viteri, S.; Villegas-Ch, W. Prototype of an Emergency Response System Using IoT in a Fog Computing Environment. Computers 2023, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Tiwari, P.; Zymbler, M. Internet of Things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: A review. J. Big Data 2019, 6, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, T. Intelligent Monitoring System for Prison Perimeter Based on Cloud Intelligence Technology. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022, 2022, 2517446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 5G Communications for Automation in Vertical Domains. 5G Americas White Paper. 2018. Available online: https://www.5gamericas.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/5G_Americas_White_Paper_Communications_for_Automation_in_Vertical_Domains_November_2018.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2023).
- Rajasekar, S.J.S. An Enhanced IoT Based Tracing and Tracking Model for COVID-19 Cases. SN Comput. Sci. 2021, 2, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuters. Water Use Rising Faster than World Population. 2011. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-population-water/water-use-rising-faster-than-world-population-idUSTRE79O3WO20111025 (accessed on 25 May 2023).
- Forbes. With Annual Losses Estimated At $14 Billion, It’s Time to Get Smarter About Water. 2013. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/heatherclancy/2013/09/19/with-annual-losses-estimated-at-14-billion-its-time-to-get-smarter-about-water/#33d936c598a2 (accessed on 25 May 2023).
- Mann, C.; Turner, A.; Salisbury, C. The Impact of Remote Consultation on Personalized Care; University of Bristol, Centre of Academic Primary Care: Bristol, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Rawashdeh, M.; Keikhosrokiani, P.; Belaton, B.; Alawida, M.; Zwiri, A. IoT Adoption and Application for Smart Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dash, S.; Shakyawar, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Kaushik, S. Big data in healthcare: Management, analysis and future prospects. J. Big Data 2019, 6, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassebo, A. A hybrid 5G/PON—Based E-Health Communication Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York, NY, USA, 1–4 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Griffin, A.C.; Chung, A.E. Health Tracking and Information Sharing in the Patient-Centered Era: A Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) Study. AMIA Symp. 2020, 2, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar]
- Sodhro, A.H.; Sennersten, C.; Ahmad, A. Towards Cognitive Authentication for Smart Healthcare Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.A.; Din, I.U.; Majali, T.; Kim, B.-S. A Survey of Authentication in Internet of Things-Enabled Healthcare Systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 9089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Machado-Jaimes, L.-G.; Bustamante-Bello, M.R.; Argüelles-Cruz, A.-J.; Alfaro-Ponce, M. Development of an Intelligent System for the Monitoring and Diagnosis of the Well-Being. Sensors 2022, 22, 9719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rejeb, A.; Rajeb, K.; Simske, S.; Treiblmaier, H.; Zailani, S. The big picture on the internet of things and the smart city: A review of what we know and what we need to know. Internet Things 2022, 19, 100565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, M.A.; Chavez, S.A.; Eltamaly, A.M.; Garces, H.O.; Rojas, A.J.; Kim, Y.-C. Toward an Intelligent Campus: IoT Platform for Remote Monitoring and Control of Smart Buildings. Sensors 2022, 22, 9045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Floris, A.; Porcu, S.; Girau, R.; Atzori, L. An IoT-Based Smart Building Solution for Indoor Environment Management and Occupants Prediction. Energies 2021, 14, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Makris, S.; Krüger, J. Smart robotics for manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2023, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryalat, M.; ElMoaqet, H.; AlFaouri, M. Design of a Smart Factory Based on Cyber-Physical Systems and Internet of Things towards Industry 4. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Industry 4.0 and The Smart Factory; InTech: Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France, 2022.
- Pech, M.; Vrchota, J.; Bednář, J. Predictive Maintenance and Intelligent Sensors in Smart Factory: Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mylonas, G.; Kalogeras, A.; Kalogeras, G.; Anagnostopoulos, C.; Alexakos, C.; Muñoz, L. Digital Twins from Smart Manufacturing to Smart Cities: A Survey. IEEE Access 2016, 9, 143222–143249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Tian, Z.; Sang, Z. Framework and Capability of Industrial IoT Infrastructure for Smart Manufacturing. Standards 2023, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dani, S.; Rahman, A.; Jin, J.; Kulkarni, A. Cloud-Empowered Data-Centric Paradigm for Smart Manufacturing. Machines 2023, 11, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Fesenko, H.; Kharchenko, V.; Zhong, L.; Kliushnikov, I.; Illiashenko, O.; Morozova, O.; Sachenko, A. UAV and IoT-Based Systems for the Monitoring of Industrial Facilities Using Digital Twins: Methodology, Reliability Models, and Application. Sensors 2022, 22, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maimaitijiang, M.; Sagan, V.; Sidike, P.; Daloye, A.M.; Erkbol, H.; Fritschi, F.B. Crop Monitoring Using Satellite/UAV Data Fusion and Machine Learning. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nduku, L.; Munghemezulu, C.; Mashaba-Munghemezulu, Z.; Kalumba, A.M.; Chirima, G.J.; Masiza, W.; De Villiers, C. Global Research Trends for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing Application in Wheat Crop Monitoring. Geomatics 2023, 3, 115–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanif, A.S.; Han, X.; Yu, S.-H. Independent Control Spraying System for UAV-Based Precise Variable Sprayer: A Review. Drones 2022, 6, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.F.F.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L. A Comparative Study on Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems in Agriculture. Agriculture 2021, 11, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dengeru, Y.; Ramasamy, K.; Allimuthu, S.; Balakrishnan, S.; Kumar, A.P.M.; Kannan, B.; Karuppasami, K.M. Study on Spray Deposition and Drift Characteristics of UAV Agricultural Sprayer for Application of Insecticide in Redgram Crop (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christiansen, M.P.; Laursen, M.S.; Jørgensen, R.N.; Skovsen, S.; Gislum, R. Designing and Testing a UAV Mapping System for Agricultural Field Surveying. Sensors 2017, 17, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samreen, T.; Ahmad, M.; Baig, M.T.; Kanwal, S.; Nazir, M.Z.; Muntaha, S.T. Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture for Irrigation Management. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 23, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alawad, W.; Ben Halima, N.; Aziz, L. An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) System for Disaster and Crisis Management in Smart Cities. Electronics 2023, 12, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsamhi, S.H.; Shvetsov, A.V.; Kumar, S.; Shvetsova, S.V.; Alhartomi, M.A.; Hawbani, A.; Rajput, N.S.; Srivastava, S.; Saif, A.; Nyangaresi, V.O. UAV Computing-Assisted Search and Rescue Mission Framework for Disaster and Harsh Environment Mitigation. Drones 2022, 6, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zwęgliński, T. The Use of Drones in Disaster Aerial Needs Reconnaissance and Damage Assessment—Three-Dimensional Modeling and Orthophoto Map Study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porte, J.; Briones, A.; Maso, J.M.; Pares, C.; Zaballos, A.; Pijoan, J.L. Heterogeneous wireless IoT architecture for natural disaster monitorization. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2020, 2020, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, K.; Anand, D.; Sabharwal, M.; Tiwari, P.K.; Cheikhrouhou, O.; Frikha, T. A Disaster Management Framework Using Internet of Things-Based Interconnected Devices. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 9916440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carreras-Coch, A.; Navarro, J.; Sans, C.; Zaballos, A. Communication Technologies in Emergency Situations. Electronics 2022, 11, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Federici, F.; Martintoni, D.; Senni, V. A Zero-Trust Architecture for Remote Access in Industrial IoT Infrastructures. Electronics 2023, 12, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halder, S.; Afsari, K. Robots in Inspection and Monitoring of Buildings and Infrastructure: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galdelli, A.; D’imperio, M.; Marchello, G.; Mancini, A.; Scaccia, M.; Sasso, M.; Frontoni, E.; Cannella, F. A Novel Remote Visual Inspection System for Bridge Predictive Maintenance. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabbar, H.A.; Chahid, A.; Isham, M.U.; Grover, S.; Singh, K.P.; Elgazzar, K.; Mousa, A.; Ouda, H. HAIS: Highways Automated-Inspection System. Technologies 2023, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Li, W.; Chen, S. Automatic Power Line Inspection Using UAV Images. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitrova, M.; Aminzadeh, A.; Meiabadi, M.S.; Karganroudi, S.S.; Taheri, H.; Ibrahim, H. A Survey on Non-Destructive Smart Inspection of Wind Turbine Blades Based on Industry 4.0 Strategy. Appl. Mech. 2022, 3, 1299–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pincheira, M.; Antonini, M.; Vecchio, M. Integrating the IoT and Blockchain Technology for the Next Generation of Mining Inspection Systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tokkozhina, U.; Mataloto, B.M.; Martins, A.L.; Ferreira, J.C. Decentralizing Online Food Delivery Services: A Blockchain and IoT Model for Smart Cities. Mob. Networks Appl. 2023, 2023, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seth, A.; James, A.; Kuantama, E.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Han, R. Drone High-Rise Aerial Delivery with Vertical Grid Screening. Drones 2023, 7, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambo, N.; Musonda, I. Impact of IoT on Achieving Smart Primary Healthcare Building Facilities in Gauteng, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yavari, A.; Bagha, H.; Korala, H.; Mirza, I.; Dia, H.; Scifleet, P.; Sargent, J.; Shafiei, M. ParcEMon: IoT Platform for Real-Time Parcel Level Last-Mile Delivery Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting and Management. Sensors 2022, 22, 7380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertino, E.; Choo, K.R.; Georgakopolous, D.; Nepal, S. Internet of Things (IoT): Smart and Secure Service Delivery. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2016, 16, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khargharia, H.S.; Rehman, M.H.U.; Banerjee, A.; Montori, F.; Forkan, A.R.M.; Jayaraman, P.P. Towards Marketing 4.0: Vision and Survey on the Role of IoT and Data Science. Societies 2023, 13, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, V.; Gandhi, M.K. Internet of Things (IoT) on E-commerce Logistics: A Review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1964, 062113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irugalbandara, C.; Naseem, A.S.; Perera, S.; Kiruthikan, S.; Logeeshan, V. A Secure and Smart Home Automation System with Speech Recognition and Power Measurement Capabilities. Sensors 2023, 23, 5784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dubey, A.K.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.R.; Gayathri, N.; Das, P. (Eds.) AI and IoT-Based Intelligent Automation in Robotics; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Derlukiewicz, D. Application of a Design and Construction Method Based on a Study of User Needs in the Prevention of Accidents Involving Operators of Demolition Robots. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marin-Plaza, P.; Yagüe, D.; Royo, F.; de Miguel, M.; Moreno, F.M.; Ruiz-De-La-Cuadra, A.; Viadero-Monasterio, F.; Garcia, J.; Roman, J.L.S.; Armingol, J.M. Project ARES: Driverless Transportation System. Challenges and Approaches in an Unstructured Road. Electronics 2021, 10, 1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flögel, D.; Bhatt, N.P.; Hashemi, E. Infrastructure-Aided Localization and State Estimation for Autonomous Mobile Robots. Robotics 2022, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchang, J.; Di Nuovo, A. Assistive Multimodal Robotic System (AMRSys): Security and Privacy Issues, Challenges, and Possible Solutions. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Fu, C.; Yang, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z. Design of a Closed Piggery Environmental Monitoring and Control System Based on a Track Inspection Robot. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, L.F.P.; Moreira, A.P.; Silva, M.F. Advances in Agriculture Robotics: A State-of-the-Art Review and Challenges Ahead. Robotics 2021, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyrarini, M.; Lygerakis, F.; Rajavenkatanarayanan, A.; Sevastopoulos, C.; Nambiappan, H.R.; Chaitanya, K.K.; Babu, A.R.; Mathew, J.; Makedon, F. A Survey of Robots in Healthcare. Technologies 2021, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiangala, K.S.; Wang, Z. An Experimental Safety Response Mechanism for an Autonomous Moving Robot in a Smart Manufacturing Environment Using Q-Learning Algorithm and Speech Recognition. Sensors 2022, 22, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Belmonte, J.; Segura-Robles, A.; Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J.; Parra-González, M.-E. Robotics in Education: A Scientific Mapping of the Literature in Web of Science. Electronics 2021, 10, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, H.; Sun, S.; Law, R. A Review of Robotic Applications in Hospitality and Tourism Research. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, A.P.; Ketsmur, M.; Almeida, N.; Teixeira, A. An Accessible Smart Home Based on Integrated Multimodal Interaction. Sensors 2021, 21, 5464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gohar, A.; Nencioni, G. The Role of 5G Technologies in a Smart City: The Case for Intelligent Transportation System. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellini, P.; Nesi, P.; Pantaleo, G. IoT-Enabled Smart Cities: A Review of Concepts, Frameworks and Key Technologies. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Martín, J.P.; Torralba, A. Model of a Device-Level Combined Wireless Network Based on NB-IoT and IEEE 802.15.4 Standards for Low-Power Applications in a Diverse IoT Framework. Sensors 2021, 21, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogbodo, E.U.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M.; Kurien, A.M. Enabling LPWANs for Coexistence and Diverse IoT Applications in Smart Cities Using Lightweight Heterogenous Multihomed Network Model. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2022, 11, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basford, P.J.; Bulot, F.M.J.; Apetroaie-Cristea, M.; Cox, S.J.; Ossont, S.J. LoRaWAN for Smart City IoT Deployments: A Long-Term Evaluation. Sensors 2020, 20, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Saleem, A.; Zheng, G. Analysis of LTE-M Adjacent Channel Interference in Rail Transit. Sensors 2022, 22, 3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathak, G.; Gutierrez, J.; Ghobakhlou, A.; Rehman, S.U. LPWAN Key Exchange: A Centralized Lightweight Approach. Sensors 2022, 22, 5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahlman, E.; Parkvall, S.; Sköld, J. 4G: LTE/LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holma, H.; Toskala, A. (Eds.) LTE for UMTS: Evolution to LTE-Advanced; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez, J. Fundamentals of 5G Mobile Networks; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, X.; Lee, N. 5G and Beyond Fundamentals and Standards; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Dwivedi, J.; Mahgoub, I. Robotic Surgery—A Review on Recent advances in Surgical Robotic Systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 10–11 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Bramhe, S.; Pathak, S.S. Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2022, 14, 29179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boccardi, F.; Heath, R.W.; Lozano, A.; Marzetta, T.L.; Popovski, P. Five disruptive technology directions for 5G. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsharif, M.H.; Kelechi, A.H.; Albreem, M.A.; Chaudhry, S.A.; Zia, M.S.; Kim, S. Sixth Generation (6G) Wireless Networks: Vision, Research Activities, Challenges and Potential Solutions. Symmetry 2020, 12, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, J.T.; Phelps, N. The Evolution of Smart City: Case studies of Barcelona, Spain and Helsinki, Finland; Melbourne School of Design: Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Szarek-Iwaniuk, P.; Senetra, A. Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, Y.; Lee, M. Smart City 4.0 from the Perspective of Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EPRS. Social Approach to the Transition to Smart Cities; EPRS—European Parliamentary Research Service: Brussels, Belgium, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Buttazzoni, A.; Veenhof, M.; Minaker, L. Smart City and High-Tech Urban Interventions Targeting Human Health: An Equity-Focused Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Micozzi, N.; Yigitcanlar, T. Understanding Smart City Policy: Insights from the Strategy Documents of 52 Local Governments. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golubchikov, O. People-Smart Sustainable Cities; The United Nations (UN): Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hodson, E.; Vainio, T.; Sayún, M.N.; Tomitsch, M.; Jones, A.; Jalonen, M.; Börütecene, A.; Hasan, M.T.; Paraschivoiu, I.; Wolff, A.; et al. Evaluating Social Impact of Smart City Technologies and Services: Methods, Challenges, Future Directions. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2023, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tobias, K. Smart Cities: A snapshot of Australia in 2019; KPMG: Sidney, NSW, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Makieła, Z.J.; Stuss, M.M.; Mucha-Kuś, K.; Kinelski, G.; Budziński, M.; Michałek, J. Smart City 4.0: Sustainable Urban Development in the Metropolis GZM. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nugraha, Y. Building a Smart City 4.0 Ecosystem Platform: An Overview and Case Study. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), Bandung, Indonesia, 19–20 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Rocque, M. Smart Cities World City Profiles—The Republic of Singapore. SmartCitiesWorld, 2017. Available online: https://www.smartcitiesworld.net/city-profile/smart-cities-reports/smartcitiesworld-profile--singapore-full-report-1767 (accessed on 6 June 2023).
- Das, D.; Lim, N.D.; Aravind, P. Developing a Smart and Sustainable Campus in Singapore. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasznar, A.P.P.; Hammad, A.W.A.; Najjar, M.; Qualharini, E.L.; Figueiredo, K.; Soares, C.A.P.; Haddad, A.N. Multiple Dimensions of Smart Cities’ Infrastructure: A Review. Buildings 2021, 11, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Ramakrishna, S.; Manganelli, M. Smart Building Technologies in Response to COVID-19. Energies 2022, 15, 5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glasco, J. Smart Cities World City Profiles—Barcelona. SmartCitiesWorld, 2019. Available online: https://www.smartcitiesworld.net/city-profile/smart-cities-reports/smartcitiesworld-city-profile--barcelona-4800 (accessed on 7 June 2023).
- Kim, N.; Yang, S. Conceptually Related Smart Cities Services from the Perspectives of Governance and Sociotechnical Systems in Europe. Systems 2023, 11, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berigüete, F.E.; Cantalapiedra, I.R.; Palumbo, M.; Masseck, T. Collective Intelligence to Co-Create the Cities of the Future: Proposal of an Evaluation Tool for Citizen Initiatives. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, E.; Peyman, M.; Serrat, C.; Xhafa, F. Join Operation for Semantic Data Enrichment of Asynchronous Time Series Data. Axioms 2023, 12, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somayya, M.; Ramaswamy, R. Amsterdam Smart City (ASC): Fishing village to sustainable city. In The Sustainable City XI; WIT Press: New Forest National Park, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Mancebo, F. Smart city strategies: Time to involve people. Comparing Amsterdam, Barcelona and Paris. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 2020, 13, 133–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitieka, D.; Luke, R.; Twinomurinzi, H.; Mageto, J. Smart Mobility in Urban Areas: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łukasiewicz, K.; Pietrzak, P.; Kraciuk, J.; Kacperska, E.; Cieciora, M. Sustainable Energy Development—A Systematic Literature Review. Energies 2022, 15, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fassio, F.; Chirilli, C. The Circular Economy and the Food System: A Review of Principal Measuring Tools. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The SENSEable City Lab. Copenhagen Sensible City Guide; The Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Bjørner, T. The advantages of and barriers to being smart in a smart city: The perceptions of project managers within a smart city cluster project in Greater Copenhagen. Cities 2021, 114, 103187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, B.; Noring, L. The Copenhagen City and Port: A Model for Regenerating Cities, Centennial Scholar Initiative at Brookings; The Brookings Institution: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Secretariat for Management and Communication. The Capital of Sustainable Development: The City of Copenhagen’s action plan for the Sustainable Development Goals; Department of Finance: Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Cortese, T.T.P.; de Almeida, J.F.S.; Batista, G.Q.; Storopoli, J.E.; Liu, A.; Yigitcanlar, T. Understanding Sustainable Energy in the Context of Smart Cities: A PRISMA Review. Energies 2022, 15, 2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debnath, A.; Isaksen, S.A.; Mynster, A.S.; Nielsen, J.U. White Paper Smart Cities and Communities Infrastructure; FORCE Technology: Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Taherdoost, H.; Madanchian, M. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia 2023, 3, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borruso, G.; Balletto, G. The Image of the Smart City: New Challenges. Urban Sci. 2022, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deeksha; Shukla, A. Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Dimension in Freshwater Ecosystems. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 17. [Google Scholar]
- KPMG. Smart Cities Awareness Survey Conducted Covering Five Major Cities in Japan; KPMG: Tokyo, Japan, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Elvas, L.B.; Mataloto, B.M.; Martins, A.L.; Ferreira, J.C. Disaster Management in Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 819–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aliero, M.; Asif, M.; Ghani, I.; Pasha, M.; Jeong, S. Systematic Review Analysis on Smart Building: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.S.; Woo, M.; Nam, K.; Chathoth, P.K. Smart City and Smart Tourism: A Case of Dubai. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vujković, P.; Ravšelj, D.; Umek, L.; Aristovnik, A. Bibliometric Analysis of Smart Public Governance Research: Smart City and Smart Gov-ernment in Comparative Perspective. Soc. Sci. 2022, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farag, A.A. The Story of NEOM City: Opportunities and Challenges. In New Cities and Community Extensions in Egypt and the Middle East; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Saud, M.M.A. Sustainable Land Management for NEOM Region; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Minawi, M.; IPSOS. Saudi Arabia’s Mega-City: The NEOM Project; IPSOS: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, S.; Smith, M.K. Residents’ Quality of Life in Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Land 2023, 12, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Im, J.-H.; Jang, S. Self-Sufficiency of New Administrative Capitals (NACs) Based on Types and Commuting Characteristics of Citizens: Case Study of Sejong. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.A. Smart city policy in developing countries: Case study of the new administrative capital in Egypt. J. Public Aff. 2021, 22, e2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toh, C.K. Smart city indexes, criteria, indicators and rankings: An in-depth investigation and analysis. IET Smart Cities 2022, 4, 211–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Y.; Shan, Z. How to Promote a Smart City Effectively? An Evaluation Model and Efficiency Analysis of Smart Cities in China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valeria, F. Singapore: Smart City to Smart Nation; Center for Digital Society: Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Allam, Z. The Emergence of Anti-Privacy and Control at the Nexus between the Concepts of Safe City and Smart City. Smart Cities 2019, 2, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Geest, M.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Catal, C. Smart Warehouses: Rationale, Challenges and Solution Directions. Appl. Sci. 2021, 12, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budka, K.C.; Deshpande, J.G.; Thottan, M. Communication Networks for Smart Grids; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, J.; Arpan, L.; Wu, Y.; Feiock, R.; Ozguven, E.; Arghandeh, R. The Road toward Smart Cities: A Study of Citizens’ Acceptance of Mobile Applications for City Services. Energies 2020, 13, 2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paes, V.d.C.; Pessoa, C.H.M.; Pagliusi, R.P.; Barbosa, C.E.; Argôlo, M.; de Lima, Y.O.; Salazar, H.; Lyra, A.; de Souza, J.M. Analyzing the Challenges for Future Smart and Sustainable Cities. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabrègue, B.F.G.; Bogoni, A. Privacy and Security Concerns in the Smart City. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 586–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, M.; Krawczyk, D.; Wodarski, K. Residents’ Perceptions of Challenges Related to Implementation of Smart City Solutions by Local Government. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11. [Google Scholar]
Technology | Latency (s) | Frequency (Hz) | Coverage (m) | Data Rates (bps) | Use Cases | Power Usage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bluetooth | 100 m | 2.4 G | 10 | 25 M | Indoor e-health | Low |
ZigBee | 16 m | 2.4 G | 10 | 250 K | Smart Meter, indoor e-health | Low |
WiFi | 46 m | 2.4 G | 140 | 54 M | Smart cities, waste management | Medium |
LORAWAN | 1–16 | 125–500 K | <11 K | 0.3–27 K | Healthcare, public safety | Low |
NB-IoT | 2–10 | 200 K | <25 K | 26 K | Smart meter, smart city, smart home | Low |
LTE-M | 10–20 m | 1.4–20 M | (1–10) K | 200 K–1 M | Asset trackers, fleet tracking, alarms | Low |
3G | 100 m | 850 M | (5–30) K | 3 M | ITS, energy management, monitoring | High |
LTE | 5 m | 700, 750,800,1900, 2500 M | (5–30) K | 500 M–1 G | ITS, logistics, monitoring, mobile health, infotainment | High |
5G | <1 m | 24–68 G [mmWave] | (250–300) K | (3–20) G | Smart cities, healthcare, gaming, and entertainment | High |
City | Transportation | Energy | Water | Waste |
---|---|---|---|---|
Singapore | Highly developed | Highly efficient | Well-managed | Modern |
Barcelona | Well-connected | Efficient | Well-managed | Modern |
Amsterdam | Well-connected | Efficient | Well-managed | Sustainable |
Copenhagen | Bike-friendly | Sustainable | Well-managed | Sustainable |
Tokyo | Complex | Efficient | Well-managed | Modern |
Dubai | Modern | Efficient | Well-managed | Modern |
Neom | Innovative | Sustainable | Sustainable | Sustainable |
NAC | Innovative | Sustainable | Sustainable | Sustainable |
City | Strategy | Key Areas | Data Sharing | Cybersecurity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Singapore | Yes | Sustainability, mobility, economy, QoL | Yes | Yes |
Barcelona | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Amsterdam | Yes | Sustainability, livability, economic growth | Yes | Yes |
Copenhagen | Yes | Energy, water, waste, mobility, buildings | Yes | Yes |
Tokyo | Yes | Transportation, energy, environment | Yes | Yes |
Dubai | Yes | Mobility, energy, water, waste, environment | Yes | Yes |
Neom | Yes | Mobility, energy, water, waste, environment, community | TBD | TBD |
NAC | Yes | TBD | TBD |
City | Target Energy Efficiency | Actual Energy Efficiency | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Singapore | 80% | 85% | 5 |
Barcelona | 75% | 78% | 3 |
Amsterdam | 70% | 73% | 3 |
Copenhagen | 65% | 68% | 3 |
Tokyo | 60% | 63% | 3 |
Dubai | 55% | 58% | 3 |
Neom | 50% | 53% | 3 |
NAC | 45% | 48% | 3 |
City | Key Smart Mobility Initiatives |
---|---|
Singapore | Public transportation, shared mobility, autonomous vehicles, smart parking |
Barcelona | Bike sharing, autonomous vehicles, pedestrian-friendly streets |
Amsterdam | Electric buses, underground train system, cycling culture |
Copenhagen | Bike share program, cycle paths, electrifying public transportation |
Tokyo | Autonomous buses, high-speed rail network, pedestrian-friendly streets |
Dubai | Autonomous Vehicles, high-speed rail network, new airport |
Neom | High-speed rail network, autonomous vehicles, new airport |
NAC | Light rail system, electric buses, new airport |
City | Green Space | Renewable Energy | Public Transportation | Waste Management | Water Conservation | Overall Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singapore | 52% | 35% | 90% | 95% | 98% | 90 |
Barcelona | 45% | 70% | 85% | 90% | 95% | 87 |
Amsterdam | 40% | 80% | 95% | 95% | 98% | 89 |
Copenhagen | 45% | 90% | 95% | 98% | 99% | 93 |
Tokyo | 35% | 40% | 90% | 95% | 97% | 86 |
Dubai | 25% | 20% | 80% | 90% | 95% | 77 |
Neom | 50% | 50% | 90% | 95% | 98% | 88 |
NAC | 55% | 80% | 95% | 98% | 99% | 92 |
City | Public Services | Civic Engagement | Overall Score |
---|---|---|---|
Singapore | Excellent | Good | Excellent |
Barcelona | Good | Excellent | Very Good |
Amsterdam | Good | Good | Good |
Copenhagen | Excellent | Good | Excellent |
Tokyo | Very Good | Good | Very Good |
Dubai | Good | Fair | Fair |
Neom | Fair | Fair | Fair |
NAC | Poor | Poor | Poor |
City | Data Management | Privacy |
---|---|---|
Singapore | High | High |
Barcelona | High | Medium |
Amsterdam | Medium | Medium |
Copenhagen | Medium | High |
Tokyo | Medium | Low |
Dubai | Low | Low |
Neom | Low | Very Low |
NAC | Low | Low |
City | QoL Score |
---|---|
Singapore | 91.5 |
Barcelona | 90.5 |
Amsterdam | 90.0 |
Copenhagen | 89.5 |
Tokyo | 88.5 |
Dubai | 80.0 |
Neom | 78.5 |
NAC | 77.5 |
City | GDP Growth |
---|---|
Singapore | 3.5% |
Barcelona | 2.5% |
Amsterdam | 2.0% |
Copenhagen | 1.5% |
Tokyo | 1.0% |
Dubai | 0.5% |
Neom | 0.0% |
NAC | −1.0% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hassebo, A.; Tealab, M. Global Models of Smart Cities and Potential IoT Applications: A Review. IoT 2023, 4, 366-411. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot4030017
Hassebo A, Tealab M. Global Models of Smart Cities and Potential IoT Applications: A Review. IoT. 2023; 4(3):366-411. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot4030017
Chicago/Turabian StyleHassebo, Ahmed, and Mohamed Tealab. 2023. "Global Models of Smart Cities and Potential IoT Applications: A Review" IoT 4, no. 3: 366-411. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot4030017