Next Article in Journal
The 2024 Floods in Valencia (Spain): Case Study of Flood Risk Education in a Primary Education Setting
Previous Article in Journal
Casual-Nuevo Alausí Landslide (Ecuador, March 2023): A Case Study on the Influence of the Anthropogenic Factors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seismicity Patterns in Some Mediterranean Zones After the 1939 Anatolian Earthquake: Insights on Seismic Risk and the Tectonic Setting

by
Enzo Mantovani
1,
Marcello Viti
1,*,
Caterina Tamburelli
1,
Daniele Babbucci
1,
Massimo Baglione
2 and
Vittorio D’Intinosante
2
1
Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Della Terra e Dell’ambiente, Università di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
2
Regione Toscana, Settore Prevenzione Sismica, 50129 Firenze, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
GeoHazards 2025, 6(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards6020029
Submission received: 21 March 2025 / Revised: 29 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 5 June 2025

Abstract

An attempt is made at recognizing the main effects of the strong 1939 earthquake in the Easternmost Anatolian Fault on the seismic activity in key Mediterranean tectonic zones. The major earthquake trends since 1800 indicate that, in the decades following 1939, both the number and intensity of significant earthquakes increased in the central and western NAF, the western Anatolia, the Crete–Rhodes Arc, the Peloponnesus, Sicily, and even the Tell zones. In contrast, seismicity experienced a sharp decline in the Serbo-Macedonian, Epirus-Albanides, and Calabria zones. These findings provide additional constraints on the geodynamic and tectonic framework and on the role played by post-seismic relaxation in the Mediterranean region.

1. Introduction

In the long-term, tectonic activity in the Mediterranean region (Figure 1) is driven by the convergence of the Nubia and Eurasia plates and the westward extrusion of the Anatolian wedge (e.g., [1]). In the short-term, the effects of these kinematic boundary conditions are not continuous over time. They primarily develop after major earthquakes along the main fault systems. These events trigger perturbations in displacement, strain, and stress fields, which propagate through the surrounding regions at rates controlled by the elastic and viscoelastic properties of the crust and upper mantle [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The effects of these perturbations may be closely linked to the seismicity patterns of the zones involved. This study aims to identify the main effects of the strong earthquake (Mw = 7.7) that, in 1939, activated about 300 km of the eastern North Anatolian Fault (NAF) (e.g., [9,10,11,12,13]).
Several authors have suggested a close connection between the stress diffusion triggered by this event and the sequence of major earthquakes that occurred in the other segments of the NAF in the following decades, up to 1999 (Figure 2) (e.g., [8,14,15,16]).
This seismic sequence caused a westward displacement of several meters (approximately 10) of the Anatolian wedge relative to the Black Sea domain (Figure 1; [9,10]). It is reasonable to expect that such a sudden and significant displacement of a major structure accelerated the deformation of zones directly or indirectly affected by Anatolia’s motion. This primarily concerns the Aegean and Balkan sectors of the Tethyan system (Figure 1). Since these sectors (particularly their inner metamorphic core) transmit Anatolia’s westward push to the Adriatic plate [1], which in turn exerts stress on the Pelagian domain and the northern Nubian margin [1,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], some effects of the 1939 Anatolian event can also be expected in the central and western Mediterranean regions.

2. Seismicity Time Patterns (1800–2024) and Underlying Tectonic Mechanisms

The seismic histories (since 1800) of the zones considered here are shown in Figure 3. For each zone some comments are reported about the main features of the seismicity time pattern, pointing out the main changes that occurred after 1939. Then, some hypotheses are advanced about the tectonic mechanisms that may be responsible for these changes.

2.1. North Anatolian Fault

The time pattern of seismic activity along this fault (Figure 3a, Table 1) shows a marked increase after the 1939 shock, mainly evident in the interval 1942–1967. This seismic sequence has been mainly attributed to the marked increase in shear stress that affected the central and western segments of the NAF after the strong 1939 event, as an effect of post-seismic relaxation (e.g., [3,4,8,10,15]).

2.2. Western Anatolia and Crete–Rhodes Arc

The highest seismic energy release occurred in the interval 1856–1900 (Figure 3b and Table 2). The fact that such crisis started just after the very strong shock that occurred in the Aegean zone in 1856 (M = 7.7) could not be casual. Then, seismicity was relatively low until 1948, when a new seismic phase occurred, involving two events with magnitudes 6.9 and 7.1 and a higher frequency of major events (Figure 3b). This phase, mainly developed during the interval 1948–1956, might be an effect of the post-1939 westward displacement of Anatolia. This hypothesis is suggested by the following considerations about the tectonic setting of the zones involved. The strain regime in the western Anatolian region mainly relates to S–N extension (e.g., [13,42,43]), which has developed since the early Pliocene (e.g., [44,45,46]). This regime may have been induced by a complex bending pattern of the Anatolian–Aegean Tethyan belt, which involves a NW-ward displacement of the northwestern sector and a SW-ward displacement of the southwestern sector (Figure 1). The consequent N–S extension between the above structures has been accommodated by the formation of roughly E–W troughs. This tectonic mechanism and the related seismic activity may have been accelerated by the post-1939 westward displacement of Anatolia [23,25].
Seismotectonic activity in the Crete–Rhodes arc may be driven by the convergence between southwestern Anatolia (Antalya) and the Libyan promontory (Figure 1, [1,23,24,25]). The related shortening is accommodated by the southeastward bending and consequent fragmentation of this arc. This tectonic mechanism also involves a sinistral relative motion between the Crete–Rhodes arc and the Levantine oceanic domain, which is accommodated by sinistral transpression at the Pliny and Strabo faults (Figure 1). The westward displacement of Anatolia after 1939 may have accelerated both the tectonic mechanisms cited above, causing the increase in seismic activity that mainly developed in the 1948–1956 interval (Table 2). The seismic crisis that has occurred in the last 20 years might be an effect of the two strong earthquakes (M = 7.5, 7.2) that hit the westernmost sector of the NAF in 1999.

2.3. Southern Greece (Peloponnesus, Cephalonia Fault, Corinth, Ambracique, Eubea, and Thessaly Troughs)

Two intense seismic crises developed in the 1860–1870 and 1886–1900 intervals (Figure 3c, Table 3). Then, activity significantly decreased until 1947, when a new intense seismic crisis started developing, involving major events until 1959, with 13 shocks of M ≥ 6 (seven with M ≥ 6.5). In the following period, seismicity decreased but never reached very low levels.
We think that the increase in seismic activity since 1947 (Figure 3 and Table 3) may be an effect of the post-1939 Anatolian jump. This hypothesis is suggested by the fact that the post-1939 displacement of the Anatolian–Aegean system has induced a compressional regime in the Peloponnesus wedge. This regime has been accommodated by the south- to SW-ward escape of that wedge (e.g., [1,23,24,25,47,48]), guided by the dextral transpressional Cephalonia fault and by the system of curved shear faults that longitudinally cut the southern Peloponnesus. In turn, the roughly S–N divergence between the escaping Peloponnesus wedge and northern Greece has induced extensional stresses in the series of troughs located in central Greece (Corinth, Ambracique, Eubea, and Thessaly, e.g.,) as seen in Figure 1 [49,50,51,52].

2.4. Serbo-Macedonian Fault System (SM)

The time pattern of seismic activity in this zone shows a drastic drop in the period following 1939, highlighted by the fact that only one event (1978 M = 6.2) took place in this period, with respect to the previous interval (1800–1940), during which several shocks (14 with M > 6.0 and 5 with M > 6.5) took place (Figure 3d, Table 4). The hypothesis that such a decrease can be an effect of the post-1939 Anatolian advancement is supported by the fact that the push of Anatolia, transmitted by the Rhodope massif, induced a compressional regime on the SM fault system, which may have inhibited the activation of the predominantly tensional faults recognized in that zone [1,23,24,25,53,54]. The compressional interaction between the northwestern Anatolian structure and the Rhodope massif is evidenced by the deformations observed in the interposed zone (Ganos–Gelibolu thrust zone, e.g., [55,56]) and by the earthquake focal mechanisms (e.g., the 1912 Ganos event [57,58]).
The fact that the Serbo-Macedonian zone is experiencing a compressional regime is documented by geodetic observations carried out after the 1999 Izmit earthquake and by the uplift evidenced by neotectonic data [53,54]. One could wonder why in a zone periodically stressed by the compressional perturbations induced by the advancements of Anatolia, the long-term (geological) data indicate a dominant extensional regime (e.g., [59,60,61]). This intriguing problem may find an explanation if one considers that this zone is also stressed by another driving force, whose effects dominate in the long-term with respect to the compressional ones produced by the advancements of Anatolia. The driving force of extension consists of the westward displacement of the northern Hellenides, which is driven by the push of the Aegean–Balkan Tethyan belt (Figure 1). This displacement may be triggered by the major seismic crises in the Epirus front, where the northern Hellenides overthrust the Adriatic plate (e.g., [25]) An important support to the above interpretation is given by the fact that the most intense shocks in SM (Figure 3d and Table 4) occurred during the most intense seismic phases in the Epirus–Albania (Figure 3e and Table 5).

2.5. Outer Northern Hellenides (Epirus) and Albanides

During the 1800–1930 time-interval, these zones were affected by many major (M ≥ 6) earthquakes (Figure 3e, Table 5), including ten shocks with M ≥ 6.5. Then, this activity underwent a considerable drop from 1931, only involving three earthquakes with 6 ≤ M ≤ 6.5. in more than 90 years.
A possible explanation for this drastic drop of seismicity may be found by considering some major aspects of the tectonic context. During the periods of low activity along the NAF and EAF, seismotectonic activity in the Epirus thrust front is mostly due to the convergence between the Adria plate (moving roughly NNE-ward, in connection with Nubia) and the northern Hellenides. After major seismic sequences along the NAF, such as the one that occurred since 1939, the westward push of the Anatolian–Aegean Tethyan system, transmitted by the Peloponnesus wedge, may cause a slowdown accompanied by an upward flexure of the southernmost Adriatic–Ionian domain. This induces an attenuation of the compressional regime in the Epirus thrust front (and of the related seismic activity). The same mechanism could have reduced the right lateral motion between the northern Hellenides and the southern Dinarides, decreasing shear stress (and seismicity) at the decoupling transpressional faults in the Albanides (Figure 1).

2.6. Calabrian Wedge

This zone (Figure 3f, Table 6) has not been affected by major earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) since 1948. Such a long quiescence (77 years) can be considered as an anomalous “seismic behavior” of Calabria, given that the time lengths of the previous quiescences (since 1600) were never longer than 49 years and that the average inter-event time in the interval 1600–1948 is about 12 years (Table 6).
We suggest that the seismic quiescence of this zone since 1948 may be an effect of the upward flexure and slowdown that the southern Adria plate has undergone in response to the westward push of the Anatolian–Aegean Tethyan system. Such deformation may have significantly increased the resistance against the overthrusting of the Calabria wedge on the Ionian domain, i.e., the tectonic process that is mainly responsible for seismic activity in that fragmented wedge.

2.7. Sicily

Seismic activity in this zone has been very low for a long time-interval (1800–1967), during which only five earthquakes with 5.5 ≤ M ≤ 6.5 have occurred (Figure 3g and Table 7). The number of these events significantly increased in the following period, when seven shocks with M ≥ 5.5 took place in about 50 years. The possibility that the seismic behavior of Sicily in recent decades can be considered “anomalous” is also suggested by what happened in the previous two centuries (Table 7), during which the magnitude of earthquakes overcame the value of six in only three cases (1693 M = 6.1, 7.3; 1786 M = 6.1) and the average inter-event time was about 25 years, which is almost double the one in the 1968–2024 interval.
To understand the tectonic mechanism that may have caused the above increase in seismicity it is necessary to consider the tectonic evolution of this zone, that since the early Pliocene was driven by the westward push of the Anatolian–Aegean Tethyan system (Figure 4 [1,22,25,26,27]). This mechanism caused the decoupling of the Adriatic plate from Nubia through the formation of a long discontinuity crossing the Ionian domain (Victor Hensen–Medina fault) and the Hyblean–Pelagian domain (Sicily Channel fault system). Once decoupled, the Adria plate underwent a clockwise rotation, inducing a strong E–W compression on the Hyblean–Pelagian domain (Figure 4B). The consequent shortening was accommodated by the northward escape of the Adventure block and of the adjacent Maghrebian sector. In turn, the indentation of these structures induced the lateral escape of Alpine–Apennine wedges (southern Apennines and Calabria), with the formation of the central (Vavilov) and southern (Marsili) Tyrrhenian basins. A detailed explanation of this evolution is reported by [1,22,30].
Around the late Pliocene–early Pleistocene, the collision of the northern Calabrian wedge with the continental Adriatic domain caused an important change in the tectonic setting of this zone, involving a different escape trend of Calabria and the activation of the Vulcano–Syracuse fault system (Figure 4C [1]). This last discontinuity has promoted the roughly northward escape of the Hyblean block, inducing a compressional regime along its northern margin, offshore of northern Sicily [62,63]. These tectonics are still going on and may be responsible for the thrusting indicated by neotectonic data and earthquake focal mechanisms [64,65]. The acceleration of E–W compression, driven by the post-1939 Anatolian jump, may explain why the average inter-event time in Sicily has considerably decreased in recent decades (Figure 3g and Table 7).

2.8. Tell System

The time pattern of major earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5, Figure 3h, Table 8) shows an evident increase in recent decades (perhaps since 1954 and more evidently since 1980), highlighted by the high number of shocks (yellow bands in Figure 3h) and by the fact that in about 40 years this zone was hit by six earthquakes with M ≥ 6 and two with M ≥ 6.5 (Table 8). In the previous much longer interval (1800–1979), only two shocks reached a magnitude greater than six.
As suggested by [25,26,27], seismotectonic activity in the northern Nubian margin is influenced by the westward displacements of Anatolia. The push of this large wedge, transmitted by the Aegean arc and the Adria–Pelagian domain, induces E–W compression in the northern Nubian margin. This regime, combined with the NE-ward compression driven by the Nubia–Eurasia convergence, induces the dextral transpressional shear in the Tell which is indicated by neotectonic and seismological data. This tectonic context may explain the increase in seismic activity that occurred in this zone in recent decades, when the effects of the Anatolian jump might have stressed the Tell.

3. Discussion

This study suggests that the peculiar distribution of seismicity temporal patterns following the 1939 Great Anatolian Earthquake aligns with the tectonic implications of the geodynamic context proposed by the authors of [1,24,25]. Since the relevant literature presents alternative interpretations involving different driving forces and tectonic processes, it is useful to assess how these perspectives explain the evidence discussed here.
As an example, we highlight the challenges of adopting the well-known idea that Plio–Quaternary deformation in the Mediterranean region has been primarily driven by the gravitational sinking of subducted lithospheres (slab-pull model; e.g., [66,67,68,69,70,71,72]). This model implies that tectonic activity in the eastern Mediterranean is mainly governed by the southwestward pull of the retreating Ionian–Levantine slab. However, in such a scenario, the post-1939 westward displacement of Anatolia would have counteracted rather than accelerated the extensional effects of slab-pull in the Aegean region, leading to a decrease in seismicity rather than an increase.
One of the primary arguments supporting the slab-pull model (e.g., [73] is the observation that geodetic velocities in the Aegean region (30–40 mm/yr) are significantly higher than those in Anatolia (10–15 mm/yr). However, this interpretation does not consider that the current velocity field could represent a transient condition resulting from post-seismic viscoelastic relaxation triggered by the post-1939 Anatolian seismic sequence (e.g., [74,75,76] and references therein).
Another piece of geodetic evidence cited in support of the hypothesis that Anatolia is being pulled (by slab-pull) rather than pushed (by the indentation of Arabia) comes from the analysis of coseismic and postseismic displacement fields induced by the two strong earthquakes (M = 7.6, 7.8) that struck the Eastern Anatolian Fault in February 2023 [77]. The evidence that is supposed to demonstrate the above hypothesis is based on the fact that no present-day shortening is indicated by the observed geodetic deformation field at the Arabia–Anatolia boundary. However, this interpretation does not take into account that the 2023 activations of the Eastern Anatolian Fault occurred after the very strong seismic sequence that has developed along the NAF since 1939. These breaks allowed a large westward displacement of the northern Anatolian structure, causing it to diverge from southeastern Anatolia (which was less mobilized), thereby inducing a NW–SE extensional stress field at the EAF system. This suggests that the 2023 activations of that fault may have released the extensional strain previously accumulated.
The hypothesis that the westward motion of Anatolia is driven by a pull (such as the retreat of the Aegean slab) rather than by the indentation of Arabia struggles to account for other major features. The most evident is the shape of the Anatolian–Aegean Tethyan belt (Figure 1), which testifies a considerable bending. This compressional deformation is clearly incompatible with a westward pull. Another major feature that the slab-pull model struggles to explain is the presence of an extensional zone (Cretan basins) between the presumed driving force (Hellenic slab pull) and the Anatolian wedge. Additionally, it would be necessary to explain why the eastern and western Cretan basins developed at rather different times (e.g., [78,79]). Other significant inconsistencies between the observed deformation pattern and the implications of the slab-pull model are discussed by the authors of [1,23,24,25,30].
The slab-pull model also implies that tectonic activity in the central and western Mediterranean regions is not significantly influenced by the extrusion of Anatolia. However, this assumption makes it difficult to explain why after the 1939 Anatolian shock seismicity increased in Sicily and in the Tell and decreased in the Epirus–Albania and Calabria.
Another key difference between the geodynamic interpretation adopted here and the alternative ones concerns the direction of the Nubia–Eurasia convergence, which is often assumed to be oriented towards the northwest (e.g., [73,80,81,82,83]). This trend is difficult to reconcile with several important pieces of evidence from across the Mediterranean region (e.g., [1] and references therein [20]). The main difficulty lies in explaining how the Adria plate can move in an approximately perpendicular direction (towards the NNE [84,85]), despite no significant active decoupling between Nubia and Adria being recognized ([1] and references therein). A detailed discussion of these issues can be found in [1,20,22,23,29,30,86].
Several modeling studies have attempted to reproduce the effects of the post-seismic relaxation triggered by major shocks in the study area (e.g., [3,4,8,75,87]. However, the results indicate a wide range of possible effects. This variability is mainly due to insufficient knowledge of the actual structural and rheological parameters, which allows researchers to adopt different models involving the various layering of elastic and viscoelastic properties, as well as different boundary conditions. Because of this uncertainty, the results of these studies may be affected by unknown errors, making them unreliable for seismic hazard assessments. In this regard, we believe that useful insights into seismic hazards can be obtained by studying the spatio-temporal distribution of seismicity following strong shocks, and by the attempts to understand their possible connection with the geodynamic frameworks and the ongoing tectonic processes.

4. Conclusions

The post-1800 time patterns of seismic activity in key tectonic zones of the Mediterranean area suggest that the seismic sequence that has activated the whole North Anatolian Fault since 1939, has also accelerated the ongoing tectonic processes in western Anatolia, the eastern (Crete–Rhodes) and western (Peloponnesus) Hellenic arcs, Sicily, and northern Nubia, and decelerated deformations in the Serbo-Macedonian, Albanian, Epirus, and Calabrian zones. In the Aegean zones, the increase in seismicity may be due to fact that the westward displacement of Anatolia has accelerated the southward bending of the Aegean metamorphic core, leading to the fragmentation of the surrounding brittle orogenic structures. This process may have induced S–N extension in the westernmost Anatolia, NE–SW shortening in the Crete–Rhodes arc, NNE–SSW escape of the Peloponnesus wedge, and N–S extension in the Corinth, Ambracique, Eubea, and Thessaly troughs. The fact that no major shocks have occurred in the Serbo-Macedonian tensional fault system since about 1932 might be a consequence of the post-1939 compressional regime induced by the westward push of northern Anatolia, transmitted by the Rhodope massif.
The drastic drop in seismicity in the Epirus–Albania zone since about 1967 (following a long period of high activity) may indicate that the tectonic mechanism responsible for seismic activity at this thrust front (namely the convergence between the southern Adria domain and the northern Hellenides) has slowed down after the 1939 event. This effect may have been caused by the upward flexure and deceleration of the southernmost Adriatic domain in response to the westward push of the Anatolian–Aegean system. A temporary deformation of the southern Adria domain could also explain the absence of major earthquakes in Calabria since 1948, as such upward flexure may have increased the resistance against the outward migration of the Calabrian wedge, which is the mechanism primarily responsible for the breaking of that wedge. Moreover, the increase in seismic activity in Sicily after 1940 might have been the result of an acceleration of the northward motion of the Hyblean block in response to the westward push of the Anatolian–Aegean system. This driving force may also explain the increased seismic activity observed in the Tell region (e.g., [1,25,26,27]).
One could try a quantification of the statistical significance of the increases and decreases tentatively identified in the zones considered. However, we think that such information would be scarcely useful. In this regard, it can be pointed out that the variations in seismicity in the considered zone have occurred some decades after the 1939 event, which is within a range of time-intervals which are compatible with the migration rates of the post-seismic relaxation triggered by the Anatolian seismic sequence. Moreover, it can be pointed out that the increases and decreases in seismicity well-correspond to the implications of the tectonic setting in the respective zones. The possibility that such complete correspondence can merely occur by chance is certainly very low. We believe that the information provided by this work about the seismicity patterns that occurred in key tectonic zones after the strong 1939 earthquake may be useful for any study of seismic risk in the zones involved. The reader will use this information in the way they think to be plausible.
The evidence and arguments presented in this work may enhance our understanding of the relationship between the short-term development of ongoing tectonic processes and the spatiotemporal distribution of major earthquakes in the Mediterranean region. This knowledge could be useful for identifying the zones most prone to significant seismic events in the coming decades. To explain this proposal more clearly, we present some possible examples.
  • After the considerable stress drops that occurred in the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) during previous decades, one might assume that the shear stress along this discontinuity has significantly decreased, potentially implying a moderate risk of major events. However, this tentative prediction may not apply to the easternmost sector of the NAF, as the two strong earthquakes that struck the Eastern Anatolian Fault in 2023 (M = 7.8, 7.6) may have facilitated a westward displacement of the easternmost Anatolian wedge, thereby increasing shear stress along the easternmost segment of the NAF. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that such an increase could fully reload the fault near the rupture point, given the significant drop in stress in 1939. We believe that a geodetic analysis of the strain field evolution in these areas can be useful.
  • The progressive decrease in seismic activity following the intense seismic phase between 1948 and 1960 (Figure 3, Table 2) could indicate that the effects of the major Anatolian displacement in the western margin of Anatolia have passed their most intense phase. However, the emergence of a new seismic phase around 2013, which includes nine earthquakes with M ≥ 6, may suggest that this fault system is experiencing a stress increase, possibly triggered by the two strong earthquakes that occurred in 1999 along the westernmost NAF (Marmara Sea region, M = 7.5, 7.2). The recent seismic activity in the Santorini region and its potential developments could be part of this ongoing seismic phase.
  • One could expect that the two strong earthquakes that in 1999 hit the westernmost sector of the NAF have also triggered an increase in shear stress in the North Aegean Faults located along the two-branches westward of the NAF. This hypothesis is compatible with the occurrence of a major shock (M = 6.9) in 2014 along the above zone.
  • The compressional effects induced by the post-1939 Anatolian jump (documented by geodetic data) and the seismic quiescence in the Epirus zone since 1940 suggest a low hazard in the normal faults of the Serbo-Macedonian zone, as argued earlier.
  • The seismic history of southern Greece shows almost continuous activity in the last two centuries. This evidence, corroborated by the fact that three major shocks have recently occurred in Cephalonia fault in 2018, M = 6.8, and in the Thessaly troughs in 2021, M = 6.3 and 6.2, does not allow us to exclude the occurrence of a major shock in the next decade.
  • In the Epirus–Albanides zone, the lack of major earthquakes during a relatively long period (1963–2002) might be an effect of the deformation that the southern Adria plate is undergoing in response to the westward push of the Anatolian–Aegean system. However, the occurrence of some significant shocks in the last 20 years (2003 M = 6.4, 2015 M = 6.5, and 2019 M = 6.2) could indicate the progressive mitigation of the above effect, with a consequent progressive increase in seismic hazard.
  • In Calabria, the complete absence of events with M > 5.5 since 1947 may lead us to suppose that the present seismic hazard is not high. However, it is not easy to recognize how long this situation can go on for. The analysis of geodetic data may help to recognize eventual changes in the velocity field, possibly induced by the attenuation of the effects of the post-1939 Anatolian jump.
  • The fact that geodetic data indicates a roughly NW-ward motion of the northern Nubian belt (in contrast to the NNE-ward trend inferred from the Plio–Quaternary deformation pattern [1,26,27]) suggests that this zone is still experiencing the effects of the Anatolian jump and that consequently the occurrence of major shocks in the next decade can hardly be excluded.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology E.M. and M.V.; Investigation and data curation E.M., M.V., D.B., C.T., M.B. and V.D.; Writing E.M.; Fund acquisition: E.M., M.B. and V.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Regione Toscana (Italy), Department of Seismic Prevention, grant number: B65F19003190002.

Data Availability Statement

This information was reported by the cited references.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C. Neogenic Evolution of the Mediterranean Region: Geodynamics, Tectonics and Seismicity; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; p. 174. ISBN 3031621492/9783031621499. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, D.L. Accelerated plate tectonics. Science 1975, 167, 1077–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Cenni, N.; Albarello, D.; Babbucci, D. Short and long-term deformation patterns in the Aegean-Anatolian systems: Insights from space geodetic data (GPS). Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001, 28, 2325–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cenni, N.; D’onza, F.; Viti, M.; Mantovani, E.; Albarello, D.; Babbucci, D. Post seismic relaxation processes in the Aegean-Anatolian system: Insights from space geodetic data (GPS) and geological/geophysical evidence. Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl. 2002, 43, 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kenner, S.; Segall, P. Lower Crustal Structure in Northern California: Implications From Strain-Rate Variations Following the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, ETG 5-1–ETG 5-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Freed, A.M.; Bürgmann, R. Evidence of power-law flow in the Mojave Desert mantle. Nature 2004, 430, 548–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Freed, A.M. Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2005, 33, 335–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sunbul, F.; Nalbant, S.S.; Simão, N.M.; Steacy, S. Investigating viscoelastic postseismic deformation due to large earthquakes in East Anatolia, Turkey. J. Geodyn. 2016, 94–95, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barka, A.A. Slip distribution along the North Atlantic fault associated with the large earthquakes of the period 1939 to 1967. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1996, 86, 1238–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stein, R.S.; Barka, A.A.; Dieterich, J.H. Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophys. J. Int. 1997, 128, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Şengör, A.M.C.; Tüysüz, O.; İmren, C.; Sakınç, M.; Eyidoğan, H.; Görü, N.; Le Pichon, X.; Rangin, C. The North Anatolian Fault. A new look. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2005, 33, 37–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Di Giacomo, D.; Bondár, I.; Storchak, D.A.; Engdahl, E.R.; Bormann, P.; Harris, J. ISCGEM:Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2009): III. Re-computed MS and mb, proxy MW, final magnitude composition and completeness assessment. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2015, 239, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Emre, Ö.; Duman, T.Y.; Özalp, S.; Şaroğlu, F.; Olgun, Ş.; Elmacı, H.; Çan, T. Active fault database of Turkey. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2018, 16, 3229–3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Armijo, R.; Pondard, N.; Meyer, B.; Uçarkus, G.; de Lépinay, B.M.; Malavieille, J.; Dominguez, S.; Gustcher, M.; Schmidt, S.; Beck, C.; et al. Submarine fault scarps in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart (North Anatolian Fault): Implications for seismic hazard in Istanbul. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2005, 6, Q06009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lorenzo-Martin, F.; Roth, F.; Wang, R.J. Elastic and inelastic triggering of earthquakes in the North Anatolian Fault zone. Tectonophysics 2006, 424, 271–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pınar, A.; Coşkun, Z.; Mert, A.; Kalafat, D. Frictional strength of North Anatolian fault in eastern Marmara region. Earth Planets Space 2016, 68, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barka, A.A. The North Anatolian fault zone. Ann. Tectonicae 1992, 6, 164–195. [Google Scholar]
  18. Armijo, R.; Meyer, B.; Barka, A.; Chabalier, J.B.; Hubert-Ferrari, A.; Çakir, Z. The fault breaks of the 1999 earthquakes in Turkey and the tectonic evolution of the Sea of Marmara: A summary. In The 1999 Izmit and Düzce Earthquakes: Preliminary Results; Barka, A., Kozacı, Ö., Akyüz, S., Altunel, E., Eds.; İstanbul Technical University Press: İstanbul, Turkey, 2000; pp. 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sesetyan, K.; Demircioglu, M.; Rovida, A.; Albini, P.; Stucchi, M.; Zare, M.; Viganò, D.; Locati, M. SHARE-CET, the SHARE Earthquake Catalogue for Central and Eastern Turkey Complementing the SHARE European Catalogue (SHEEC). 2012. Available online: https://www.emidius.eu/SHEEC/docs/SHARE_CET.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  20. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Babbucci, D.; Albarello, D. Nubia-Eurasia kinematics: An alternative interpretation from Mediterranean and North Atlantic evidence. Ann. Geophys. 2007, 50, 311–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C.; Cenni, N.; Baglione, M.; D’Intinosante, V. Generation of back-Arc Basins as Side Effect of Shortening Processes: Examples from the Central Mediterranean. Int. J. Geosci. 2014, 5, 1062–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C.; Cenni, N. Geodynamics of the central-western Mediterranean region: Plausible and non-plausible driving forces. Marine Petroleum Geology 2020, 113, 104121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mantovani, E.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C.; Viti, M. Late Cenozoic evolution and present tectonic setting of the Aegean–Hellenic Arc. Geosciences 2022, 12, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C.; Hoxha, I.; Piccardi, L. Geodynamics of the South Balkan and Northern Aegean Regions Driven by the Westward Escape of Anatolia. Int. J. Geosci. 2023, 14, 480–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C.; Baglione, M.; D’Intinosante, V. Ductile Versus Brittle Tectonics in the Anatolian–Aegean–Balkan System. Geosciences 2024, 14, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C. Plio–Quaternary Tectonic Activity in the Northern Nubian Belts: The Main Driving Forces. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Tamburelli, C.; Babbucci, D.; Baglione, M.; D’Intinosante, V. Tectonic Setting and Spatiotemporal Earthquake Distribution in Northern Nubia and Iberia. Geosciences 2025, 15, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Viti, M.; Mantovani, E.; Tamburelli, C.; Babbucci, D. Generation of trench-arc-backarc systems in the Western Mediterranean region driven by plate convergence. Ital. J. Geosci.-Boll. Della Soc. Geol. Ital. 2009, 128, 89–106. [Google Scholar]
  29. Viti, M.; Mantovani, E.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C. Plate kinematics and geodynamics in the Central Mediterranean. J. Geodyn. 2011, 51, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Viti, M.; Mantovani, E.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C.; Caggiati, M.; Riva, A. Basic role of extrusion processes in the Late Cenozoice of the western and central Mediterranean belts. Geosciences 2021, 11, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Roussel, J. Les zones actives et la frequence des seismes en Algerie (1716–1970). Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nord. Alger 1973, 64, 211–227. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mezcua, J.; Martinez Solares, J.M. Sismicidad del Area Ibero-Moghrebi. Publicacion 203; Instituto Geografico Nacional: Madrid, Spain, 1983; p. 302. [Google Scholar]
  33. Benouar, D. Materials for the investigation of the seismicity of Algeria and adjacent regions during the twentieth century. Ann. Geofis. 1994, 37, 459–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Godey, S.; Bossu, R.; Guilbert, J.; Mazet-Roux, G. The Euro-Mediterranean Bulletin: A comprehensive seismological bulletin at regional scale. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2006, 77, 460–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ekström, G.; Nettles, M.; Dziewonski, A.M. The global CMT project 2004–2010 Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2012, 200–201, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grünthal, G.; Wahlström, R. The European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue (EMEC) for the last millennium. J. Seismol. 2012, 16, 535–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Makropoulos, K.; Kaviris, G.; Kouskouna, V. An updated and extended earthquake catalogue for Greece and adjacent areas since 1900. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 12, 1425–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stucchi, M.; Rovida, A.; Capera, A.A.G.; Alexandre, P.; Camelbeeck, T.; Demircioglu, M.B.; Gasperini, P.; Kouskouna, V.; Musson, R.M.W.; Radulian, M.; et al. SHARE European earthquake catalogue (SHEEC) 1000–1899. J. Seismol. 2012, 17, 523–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. ISIDe Working Group. Italian Seismological Instrumental and Parametric Database (ISIDe); Version 1.0; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV): Rome, Italy, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rovida, A.; Locati, M.; Camassi, R.; Lolli, B.; Gasperini, P.; Antonucci, A. Italian Parametric Earthquake Catalogue (CPTI15); Version 4.0; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV): Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS). Available online: http://ds.iris.edu/ieb/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  42. Kiratzi, A.A. Stress tensor inversions along the westernmost North Anatolian Fault Zone and its continuation into the North Aegean Sea. Geophys. J. Int. 2002, 151, 360–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, Y.-S.; Melgar, D.; Ruiz-Angulo, A.; Ganas, A.; Taymaz, T.; Crowell, B.; Xu, X.; Tsironi, V.; Karasante, I.; Yolsal-Çevikbilen, S.; et al. The 2020 Mw 7.0 Samos (Eastern Aegean Sea) Earthquake: Joint source inversion of multitype data, and tsunami modelling. Geophys. J. Int. 2024, 237, 1285–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bozkurt, E. Timing of extension on the Büyük Menderes Graben, western Turkey, and its tectonic implications. In Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area; Bozkurt, E., Winchester, J.A., Piper, J.D.A., Eds.; Geological Society Special Publication no. 173; Geological Society: London, UK, 2000; pp. 385–403. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yılmaz, Y.; Genç, S.C.; Gürer, F.; Bozcu, M.; Yılmaz, K.; Karacik, Z.; Altunkaynak, S.; Elmas, A. When did the western Anatolian grabens begin to develop? In Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area; Bozkurt, E., Bozkurt, J.A., Piper, J.D.A., Winchester, J.A., Eds.; Geological Society of London, Special Publications: London, UK, 2000; Volume 173, pp. 353–384. [Google Scholar]
  46. Çiftçi, N.B.; Bozkurt, E. Evolution of the Miocene sedimentary fill of the Gediz Graben, SW Turkey. Sediment. Geol. 2009, 216, 49–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sachpazi, M.; Hirn, A.; Clément, C.; Haslinger, F.; Laigle, M.; Kissling, E.; Charvis, P.; Hello, Y.; Lépine, J.-C.; Sapin, M.; et al. Western Hellenic Subduction and Cephalonia Transform: Local Earthquakes and Plate Transport and Strain. Tectonophysics 2000, 319, 301–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karakostas, V.G.; Papadimitriou, E.E.; Karamanos, C.K.; Kementzetzidou, D.A. Microseismicity and seismotectonic properties of the Lefkada—Kefalonia seismic zone. Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece 2010, 43, 2053–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Armijo, R.; Meyer, B.; King, G.C.P.; Rigo, A.; Papanastassiou, D. Quaternary evolution of the Corinth rift and its implications for the late Cenozoic evolution of the Aegean. Geophys. J. Int. 1996, 126, 11–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hatzfeld, D.; Karakostas, V.; Ziazia, M.; Kassaras, I.; Papadimitriou, E.; Makropoulos, K.; Voulgaris, N.; Papaioannou, C. Microseismicity and faulting geometry in the Gulf of Corinth (Greece). Geophys. J. Int. 2000, 141, 438–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ganas, A.; Drakatos, G.; Pavlides, S.B.; Stavrakakis, G.N.; Ziazia, M.; Sokos, E.; Karastathis, V.K. The 2001 Mw = 6.4 Skyros earthquake, conjugate strike-slip faulting and spatial variation in stress within the central Aegean Sea. J. Geodyn. 2005, 39, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Papadopoulos, G.A.; Agalos, A.; Karavias, A.; Triantafyllou, I.; Parcharidis, I.; Lekkas, E. Seismic and Geodetic Imaging (DInSAR) Investigation of the March 2021 Strong Earthquake Sequence in Thessaly, Central Greece. Geosciences 2021, 11, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Georgiev, I.; Dimitrov, D.; Belijashki, T.; Pashova, L.; Shanov, S.; Nikolov, G. Geodetic constraints on kinematics of southwestern Butgaria from GPS and levelling data. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2007, 291, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dobrev, N. 3D Monitoring of Active Fault Structures in The Krupnik-Kresna Seismic Zone, SW Bulgaria. Acta Geodyn. Geomater. 2011, 8, 377–388. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yaltırak, C.; Alpar, B.; Yuce, H. Tectonic Elements Controlling the Evolution of the Gulf of Saros (northeastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Tectonophysics 1998, 300, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yaltırak, C.; İşler, E.B.; Aksu, A.E.; Hiscott, R.N. Evolution of the Bababurnu Basin and shelf of the Biga Peninsula: Western extension of the middle strand of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Northeast Aegean Sea, Turkey. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2012, 57, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aksoy, M.E.; Meghraoui, M.; Vallée, M.; Çakır, Z. Rupture characteristics of the AD 1912 Mürefte (Ganos) earthquake segment of the North Anatolian fault (western Turkey). Geology 2010, 38, 991–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kiratzi, A. Source Constraints Using Ground Motion Simulations. Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece 2013, 47, 1128–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Burchfiel, B.; Nakov, R.; Dumurdzanov, N.; Papanikolaou, D.; Tzankov, T.; Serafimovski, T.; King, R.; Kotzev, V.; Todosov, A.; Nurce, B. Evolution and dynamics of the Cenozoic tectonics of the South Balkan extensional system. Geosphere 2008, 4, 919–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Van Hinsbergen, D.; Schmid, S.M. Map view restoration of Aegean-West Anatolian accretion and extension since the Eocene. Tectonics 2012, 31, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Piccardi, L.; Dobrev, N.; Moratti, G.; Corti, G.; Tondi, E.; Vannucci, G.; Matova, M.; Spina, V. Overview and New Data on the Active Tectonics of Bulgaria: Towards a Comprehensive Seismotectonic Map. Acta Volcanol. 2013, 25, 67–82. [Google Scholar]
  62. Finetti, I.R.; Lentini, F.; Carbone, S.; Del Ben, A.; Di Stefano, A.; Forlin, E.; Guarnieri, P.; Pipan, M.; Prizzon, A. Geological Outline of Sicily and Lithospheric Tectono-Dynamics of its Tyrrhenian Margin from New CROP Seismic Data. In CROP PROJECT, Deep Seismic Exploration of the Central Mediterranean and Italy; Finetti, I.R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Chapter 15; pp. 319–376. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sulli, A.; Morticeli, M.G.; Agate, M.; Zizzo, E. Active north-vergent thrusting in the northern Sicily continental margin in the frame of the Quaternary evolution of the Sicilian collisional system. Tectonophysics 2021, 802, 228717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pondrelli, S.; Salimbeni, S.; Ekström, G.; Morelli, A.; Gasperini, P.; Vannucci, G. The Italian CMT dataset from 1977 to the present. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2006, 159, 286–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Loreto, M.F.; Palmiotto, C.; Muccini, F.; Ferrante, V.; Zitellini, N. Inverted Basins by Africa–Eurasia Convergence at the Southern Back-Arc Tyrrhenian Basin. Geosciences 2021, 11, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Malinverno, A.; Ryan, W.B.F. Extension in the Tyrrhenian sea and shortening in the Apennines as result of arc migration driven by sinking of the lithosphere. Tectonics 1986, 5, 227–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Royden, L.H. Evolution of retreating subduction boundaries formed during continental collision. Tectonics 1993, 12, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rosenbaum, G. Geodynamics of oroclinal bending: Insights from the Mediterranean. J. Geodyn. 2014, 82, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Van Hinsbergen, D.J.J.; Vissers, R.L.M.; Spakman, W. Origin and consequences of western Mediterranean subduction, rollback and slab segmentation. Tectonics 2014, 33, 393–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Royden, L.; Faccenna, C. Subduction orogeny and the late Cenozoic evolution of the Mediterranean Arcs. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2018, 46, 261–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Romagny, A.; Jolivet, L.; Menant, A.; Bessière, E.; Maillard, A.; Canva, A.; Gorini, C.; Augier, R. Detailed tectonic reconstructions of the western Mediterranean region for the last 35 Ma, insights on driving mechanisms. Bull. Société Géologique Fr. 2020, 191, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jolivet, L.; Menant, A.; Roche, V.; Le Pourhiet, L.; Maillard, A.; Augier, R.; Do Couto, D.; Gorini, C.; Thinon, I.; Canva, A. Transfer zones in Mediterranean back-arc regions and tear faults. BSGF Earth Sci. Bull. 2021, 192, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Faccenna, C.; Becker, T.W.; Auer, L.; Billi, A.; Boschi, L.; Brun, J.P.; Capitanio, F.A.; Funiciello, F.; Horvàth, F.; Jolivet, L.; et al. Mantle dynamics in the Mediterranean. Rev. Geophys. 2014, 52, 283–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Feigl, K.L.; Thatcher, W. Geodetic observations of post-seismic transients in the context of the earthquake deformation cycle. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2006, 338, 1012–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hearn, E.H.; McClusky, S.; Ergintav, S.; Reilinger, R.E. Izmit earthquake postseismic deformation and dynamics of the North Anatolian Fault Zone. J. Geophys. Res. 2009, 114, B08405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Viti, M.; Mantovani, E.; Cenni, N.; Vannucchi, A. Post Seismic Relaxation: An Example of Earthquake Triggering in the Apennine Belt (1915–1920). J. Geodyn. 2012, 61, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ergintav, S.; Vernant, P.; Tan, O.; Karabulut, H.; Özarpacı, S.; Floyd, M.; Konca, A.Ö.; Çakır, Z.; Acarel, D.; Çakmak, R.; et al. Unexpected far-field deformation of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes revealed by space geodesy. Science 2024, 386, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mercier, J.L.; Simeakis, K.; Sorel, D.; Vergely, P. Extensional tectonic regimes in the Aegean basins during the Cenozoic. Basin Res. 1989, 2, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Armijo, R.; Lyon-Caen, H.; Papanastassiou, D. East-west extension and Holocene normal-fault scarps in the Hellenic arc. Geology 1992, 20, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Di Bucci, D.; Burrato, P.; Vannoli, P.; Valensise, G. Tectonic evidence for the ongoing Africa-Eurasia convergence in central Mediterranean foreland areas: A journey among long-lived shear zones, large earthquakes, and elusive fault motions. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115, B12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Meghraoui, M.; Pondrelli, S. Active faulting and transpression tectonics along the plate boundary in North Africa. Ann. Geophys. 2012, 55, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Booth-Rea, G.; Gaidi, S.; Melki, F.; Marzougui, W.; Azañón, J.M.; Zargouni, F.; Galvé, J.P.; Pérez-Peña, J.V. Late Miocene extensional collapse of northern Tunisia. Tectonics 2018, 37, 1626–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jolivet, L.; Baudin, T.; Calassou, S.; Chevrot, S.; Ford, M.; Issautier, B.; Lasseur, E.; Masini, E.; Manatschal, G.; Mouthereau, F.; et al. Geodynamic evolution of a wide plate boundary in the Western Mediterranean, near-field versus far-field interactions. BSGF Earth Sci. Bull. 2021, 192, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Cenni, N.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C. Present velocity field in the Italian region by GPS data: Geodynamic/tectonic implications. Int. J. Geosci. 2015, 6, 1285–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Serpelloni, E.; Cavaliere, A.; Martelli, L.; Pintori, F.; Anderlini, L.; Borghi, A.; Randazzo, D.; Bruni, S.; Devoti, R.; Perfetti, P.; et al. Surface velocities and strain-rates in the Euro-Mediterranean region from massive GPS data processing. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 907897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mantovani, E.; Babbucci, D.; Tamburelli, C.; Viti, M. A review on the driving mechanism of the Tyrrhenian-Apennines system: Implications for the present seismotectonic setting in the Central-Northern Apennines. Tectonophysics 2009, 476, 22–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. DeVries, P.M.R.; Krastev, P.G.; Meade, B.J. Geodetically constrained models of viscoelastic stress transfer and earthquake triggering along the North Anatolian fault. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2016, 17, 2700–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Tectonic scheme of the Mediterranean area. (1) European continental domain, (2) Nubia-Adriatic and Arabia continental domain, (3) Ionian-Levantine oceanic domain, (4, 5) outer and inner belts of the Tethyan system, constituted by metamorphic massifs and ophiolitic units, respectively, (6) Atlas belt, (7) other orogenic belts, (8) Rhodope and Serbo-Macedonian (SM) massifs, (9) Black Sea thinned domain, (10) Cenozoic basins, (11, 12, 13) extensional, transcurrent, and compressional features, and (14) outer fronts of the orogenic belts. Al = Albanides; An = Antalya peninsula; Ce = Cephalonia fault; Co = Corinth trough; CA = Calabria; CS = Corsica–Sardinia block; EAF = Eastern Anatolian Fault; ECA = External Calabrian Arc; Eu = Eubea; Ga-Ge = Ganos–Gelibolu thrust fault; Ma = Marmara trough; MR = Mediterranean ridge; NAF = North Anatolian Fault; NA = North Aegean trough; Pe = Peloponnesus wedge; Pl = Pliny fault; Rh = Rhodes; St = Strabo fault; The = Thessaly.
Figure 1. Tectonic scheme of the Mediterranean area. (1) European continental domain, (2) Nubia-Adriatic and Arabia continental domain, (3) Ionian-Levantine oceanic domain, (4, 5) outer and inner belts of the Tethyan system, constituted by metamorphic massifs and ophiolitic units, respectively, (6) Atlas belt, (7) other orogenic belts, (8) Rhodope and Serbo-Macedonian (SM) massifs, (9) Black Sea thinned domain, (10) Cenozoic basins, (11, 12, 13) extensional, transcurrent, and compressional features, and (14) outer fronts of the orogenic belts. Al = Albanides; An = Antalya peninsula; Ce = Cephalonia fault; Co = Corinth trough; CA = Calabria; CS = Corsica–Sardinia block; EAF = Eastern Anatolian Fault; ECA = External Calabrian Arc; Eu = Eubea; Ga-Ge = Ganos–Gelibolu thrust fault; Ma = Marmara trough; MR = Mediterranean ridge; NAF = North Anatolian Fault; NA = North Aegean trough; Pe = Peloponnesus wedge; Pl = Pliny fault; Rh = Rhodes; St = Strabo fault; The = Thessaly.
Geohazards 06 00029 g001
Figure 2. (A) Main segments of the North Anatolian Fault that failed since 1939 (based on [17,18]). Seismicity data as [19]. (B) The pie chart shows the relative seismic moment of the major earthquakes of the above sequence. The total seismic moment released from 1939 to 1999 is 1.16 ∙ 1021 Nm [15].
Figure 2. (A) Main segments of the North Anatolian Fault that failed since 1939 (based on [17,18]). Seismicity data as [19]. (B) The pie chart shows the relative seismic moment of the major earthquakes of the above sequence. The total seismic moment released from 1939 to 1999 is 1.16 ∙ 1021 Nm [15].
Geohazards 06 00029 g002
Figure 3. Time patterns of seismic activity since 1800. (a) North Anatolian Fault, (b) westernmost Anatolia and Crete–Rhodes arc, (c) southern Greece, (d) Serbo-Macedonian fault system, (e) Epirus thrust front and Albania shear faults, (f) Calabrian wedge, (g) Sicily, and (h) Tell belt. The yellow columns indicate the number of earthquakes with M ≥ 5.5, while the red bars relate to the equivalent magnitude (sum of energies converted in magnitude by the relation log E = 1.5M + 11.8) of the annual seismicity. The geometries of the zones considered are shown in the map, with the corresponding letters. Data from [19,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
Figure 3. Time patterns of seismic activity since 1800. (a) North Anatolian Fault, (b) westernmost Anatolia and Crete–Rhodes arc, (c) southern Greece, (d) Serbo-Macedonian fault system, (e) Epirus thrust front and Albania shear faults, (f) Calabrian wedge, (g) Sicily, and (h) Tell belt. The yellow columns indicate the number of earthquakes with M ≥ 5.5, while the red bars relate to the equivalent magnitude (sum of energies converted in magnitude by the relation log E = 1.5M + 11.8) of the annual seismicity. The geometries of the zones considered are shown in the map, with the corresponding letters. Data from [19,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
Geohazards 06 00029 g003
Figure 4. Tentative reconstruction of the tectonic processes that developed in the central and western Mediterranean regions in response to the late Miocene collision between the Anatolian–Aegean Tethyan system (AATS) and the Adriatic promontory [1]. See text for explanations. (1) Continental domains, (2) thinned continental and oceanic domains, (3) orogenic belts, and (4) zones of intense (a) or moderate (b) crustal thinning. (A) Late Miocene. Ad = Adventure domain; Hy = Hyblean plateau, Pa = Palinuro fault, and Ta = Taormina fault. (B) Middle Pliocene. Aw = Adventure wedge, Va = Vavilov basin, and VHM = Victor Hensen–Medina fault. (C) Middle Pleistocene. Ce = Cephalonia fault, ECA = External Calabrian Arc, Mar = Marsili basin, Si = Sibari fault, and Sy-Vu = Syracuse–Vulcano fault. Other symbols as in Figure 1.
Figure 4. Tentative reconstruction of the tectonic processes that developed in the central and western Mediterranean regions in response to the late Miocene collision between the Anatolian–Aegean Tethyan system (AATS) and the Adriatic promontory [1]. See text for explanations. (1) Continental domains, (2) thinned continental and oceanic domains, (3) orogenic belts, and (4) zones of intense (a) or moderate (b) crustal thinning. (A) Late Miocene. Ad = Adventure domain; Hy = Hyblean plateau, Pa = Palinuro fault, and Ta = Taormina fault. (B) Middle Pliocene. Aw = Adventure wedge, Va = Vavilov basin, and VHM = Victor Hensen–Medina fault. (C) Middle Pleistocene. Ce = Cephalonia fault, ECA = External Calabrian Arc, Mar = Marsili basin, Si = Sibari fault, and Sy-Vu = Syracuse–Vulcano fault. Other symbols as in Figure 1.
Geohazards 06 00029 g004
Table 1. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1800 along the NAF (Figure 3a). The last column reports the numbers relating to the respective reference.
Table 1. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1800 along the NAF (Figure 3a). The last column reports the numbers relating to the respective reference.
YearMR
18096.338
18266.338
18295.838
18415.838
18455.838
18456.338
18506.738
18516.238
18515.838
18557.038
18556.738
18606.238
18625.838
18636.338
18656.438
18656.638
18676.938
18675.838
18675.838
18676.238
18705.838
18715.838
18735.819
18776.338
18786.338
18816.219
18825.738
18845.838
18885.819
18946.738
19055.736
19075.636
19096.419
19095.819
19095.819
19127.436
19126.236
19125.536
19126.936
19175.536
19185.819
19185.519
19195.819
19196.736
19235.919
19235.636
19245.536
19265.836
19285.536
19296.019
19305.719
19356.236
19356.236
19365.519
19395.536
19397.719
19415.619
19425.736
19425.636
19425.519
19427.119
19436.436
19435.636
19437.319
19447.219
19445.519
19445.636
19445.619
19446.936
19455.719
19516.919
19537.236
19535.536
19535.536
19565.636
19575.936
19577.236
19595.536
19605.919
19645.736
19646.936
19675.536
19677.336
19676.119
19675.736
19695.836
19755.536
19755.836
19775.519
19795.536
19835.836
19926.719
19926.319
19955.819
19965.719
19965.719
19997.536
19995.836
19995.636
19997.236
19995.536
2000619
20005.536
20036.219
20035.836
20195.734
20226.134
Table 2. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5 that occurred since 1800 in the western Anatolian and Creta–Rhodes zones (Figure 3b).
Table 2. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5 that occurred since 1800 in the western Anatolian and Creta–Rhodes zones (Figure 3b).
YearMR
18056.438
18156.338
18175.838
18175.538
18205.938
18285.838
18315.738
18436.538
18456.738
18456.238
18466.138
18466.138
18505.938
18516.838
18525.838
18556.238
18555.838
18567.738
18566.138
18575.838
18626.338
18626.538
18655.838
18656.238
18665.838
18666.238
18666.138
18666.238
18685.838
18685.738
18696.838
18696.838
18706.138
18715.838
18715.738
18735.938
18736.138
18736.238
18735.838
18747.038
18745.838
18755.838
18756.138
18776.238
18775.938
18806.238
18806.238
18816.538
18815.938
18836.738
18836.238
18866.338
18866.038
18875.838
18905.838
18906.138
18916.238
18915.938
18915.838
18925.838
18935.838
18956.638
18956.238
18965.938
18976.238
18986.938
18996.738
19035.636
19045.536
19046.036
19046.036
19045.836
19085.536
19095.536
19105.536
19125.636
19205.836
19265.836
19275.636
19286.336
19285.636
19375.536
19385.736
19395.536
19396.436
19416.336
19425.536
19425.936
19425.536
1942636
19465.936
19486.936
19486.236
19526.436
19555.536
19567.136
19566.036
19595.936
19596.036
19665.836
19685.836
19695.936
19695.936
19696.136
19695.936
19696.036
19705.536
19726.236
19745.536
19765.636
19775.636
19796.136
19865.736
19895.636
19895.636
19915.736
1992636
19925.836
19945.536
19965.836
19975.736
20035.836
20035.536
20046.136
20045.636
20055.636
20055.836
20055.836
20056.036
20115.535
20126.035
20136.235
20136.035
20136.435
20156.134
20176.334
20176.634
20205.634
20205.634
20205.734
20206.634
20205.834
20207.034
20215.534
20215.734
20216.034
20216.434
20215.634
20225.534
Table 3. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1800 in southern Greece (Figure 3c).
Table 3. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1800 in southern Greece (Figure 3c).
YearMR
18046.438
18055.938
18066.138
18116.038
18156.338
18176.638
18206.638
18206.938
18256.738
18265.838
18315.938
18336.238
18376.038
18406.438
18426.238
18466.838
18525.938
18536.738
18586.538
18616.938
18626.438
18646.038
18666.338
18677.238
18676.538
18686.338
18696.738
18706.838
18735.938
18736.338
18745.538
18765.938
18856.138
18867.238
18876.338
18886.338
18896.438
18916.338
18915.838
18936.338
18936.238
18946.838
18946.938
1897638
18996.538
19015.536
19015.736
19025.736
19025.536
19035.636
19035.536
19095.936
19095.536
19095.636
19126.136
19145.936
1914636
19156.136
19155.936
19156.336
19155.636
19156.036
19155.736
19165.736
19175.736
19196.036
19215.536
19265.536
19265.736
19266.836
19275.636
19286.336
19315.636
19385.736
19435.636
19476.536
19486.536
19515.536
19525.636
19536.036
19536.636
19537.036
19535.936
19535.736
19536.136
19535.636
19536.236
19546.536
19556.036
19555.736
19575.936
19576.336
19576.636
19586.336
19596.736
19595.536
19605.736
19625.736
19626.136
19635.736
19656.236
19666.036
19665.736
19685.836
19695.736
19706.036
19705.836
19735.836
19755.636
19765.636
19806.436
19816.436
19816.136
19816.236
19815.536
19815.636
19836.836
19835.536
19836.036
19855.536
19865.736
19875.536
19885.636
19895.636
19926.036
19945.636
19956.336
19965.736
19976.636
19975.636
19976.036
19985.636
19996.036
20005.836
20005.536
20015.636
20025.736
20036.436
20035.536
20055.836
20055.636
20065.636
20075.735
20086.535
20086.835
20086.235
20086.435
20085.635
20095.737
20095.835
20105.535
20105.635
20125.835
20125.635
20135.535
20146.135
20146.135
20156.534
20185.534
20186.834
20185.634
20185.734
20205.734
20215.534
20225.534
Table 4. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1800 in the Serbo-Macedonian zone (Figure 3d).
Table 4. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1800 in the Serbo-Macedonian zone (Figure 3d).
YearMR
18297.038
18396.138
18676.138
18745.738
18945.838
18945.638
18945.938
18945.538
19026.436
19035.536
19047.236
19046.936
19046.336
19045.936
19056.436
19055.536
19105.536
19316.236
19316.736
19326.836
19326.036
19325.936
19326.436
19325.836
19336.436
19585.836
19755.836
19785.836
19786.236
19785.536
19855.536
Table 5. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1800 in Epirus and Albanides (Figure 3e).
Table 5. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1800 in Epirus and Albanides (Figure 3e).
YearMR
18096.138
18136.438
18165.938
18236.138
18336.238
18436.238
18486.438
18516.838
18516.638
18516.438
18515.738
18515.938
18516.138
18526.238
18546.038
18585.938
18586.238
18586.438
18596.238
18595.938
18596.238
18606.438
18605.938
18606.238
18606.238
18626.238
18645.938
18656.338
18666.638
18666.238
18665.938
18666.138
18665.938
18666.138
18665.938
18666.438
18676.238
18695.938
18695.538
18696.038
18696.238
18706.538
18715.838
18726.538
18895.938
18905.938
18936.638
18945.938
18956.238
18956.538
18956.238
18956.238
18956.238
18965.938
18966.238
18965.938
18965.938
18965.938
18976.638
18975.738
18975.738
18986.538
19065.836
19195.836
19205.636
19206.536
19205.936
19206.036
19205.736
19225.736
19265.936
19266.336
19306.236
19305.536
19315.636
19345.736
19405.636
19465.536
19585.536
19595.936
19596.336
19595.736
19626.136
19675.536
19695.736
19695.636
19795.636
19825.836
19935.636
20196.239
Table 6. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1600 in the Calabrian wedge.
Table 6. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that occurred since 1600 in the Calabrian wedge.
YearMR
16095.840
16266.140
16387.140
16386.840
16405.840
16596.640
17085.640
17435.940
17445.740
17495.840
17675.940
17837.140
17836.740
1783740
17916.140
18326.740
18355.940
18366.240
18546.340
18706.240
18865.640
18875.640
18946.140
1905740
1907640
19087.140
19095.540
19135.640
19285.940
19475.740
Table 7. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that have occurred since 1600 in Sicily.
Table 7. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that have occurred since 1600 in Sicily.
YearMR
16135.640
16245.640
16936.140
16937.340
16985.740
17265.540
17805.540
17866.140
18186.340
18185.640
18235.840
18485.540
19415.940
19686.440
19685.540
19685.540
1978640
19805.740
19905.640
20025.940
Table 8. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that have occurred since 1800 in the Tell (Figure 3h).
Table 8. Main earthquakes (M ≥ 5.5) that have occurred since 1800 in the Tell (Figure 3h).
YearMR
18256.032
18506.032
18566.031
18566.831
18696.032
18876.032
18916.032
19106.633
19465.632
19546.033
19566.033
19655.533
19806.541
19805.941
19806.241
19805.733
19815.541
19855.733
19885.633
19896.041
19895.533
19945.935
19965.535
20005.735
20005.735
20036.841
20035.741
20035.735
20085.535
20135.535
20145.534
20216.239
20216.139
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mantovani, E.; Viti, M.; Tamburelli, C.; Babbucci, D.; Baglione, M.; D’Intinosante, V. Seismicity Patterns in Some Mediterranean Zones After the 1939 Anatolian Earthquake: Insights on Seismic Risk and the Tectonic Setting. GeoHazards 2025, 6, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards6020029

AMA Style

Mantovani E, Viti M, Tamburelli C, Babbucci D, Baglione M, D’Intinosante V. Seismicity Patterns in Some Mediterranean Zones After the 1939 Anatolian Earthquake: Insights on Seismic Risk and the Tectonic Setting. GeoHazards. 2025; 6(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards6020029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mantovani, Enzo, Marcello Viti, Caterina Tamburelli, Daniele Babbucci, Massimo Baglione, and Vittorio D’Intinosante. 2025. "Seismicity Patterns in Some Mediterranean Zones After the 1939 Anatolian Earthquake: Insights on Seismic Risk and the Tectonic Setting" GeoHazards 6, no. 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards6020029

APA Style

Mantovani, E., Viti, M., Tamburelli, C., Babbucci, D., Baglione, M., & D’Intinosante, V. (2025). Seismicity Patterns in Some Mediterranean Zones After the 1939 Anatolian Earthquake: Insights on Seismic Risk and the Tectonic Setting. GeoHazards, 6(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards6020029

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop