The Detection and Classification of Grape Leaf Diseases with an Improved Hybrid Model Based on Feature Engineering and AI
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Contribution and Novelty
- A computer-aided system was developed to assist experts in the diagnosis of grape leaf diseases. A hybrid model was proposed using ML classifiers, the NCA method, and LBP, HOG, and DenseNet201 architectures together.
- The proposed hybrid model was created by combining features from both CNNs and texture-based models.
- The proposed deep model achieved highly competitive accuracy values of 99.1% in the detection and diagnosis of grape leaf diseases.
1.2. Related Works
1.3. Organization of Paper
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Dataset
2.2. Feature Extraction and Selection Algorithms
2.3. Proposed Model
3. Results
3.1. Results of Pre-Trained CNN Models
3.2. Results of Deep Models, ML, and Feature Extraction
3.3. Results of Proposed Model
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
LBP | Local binary pattern |
HOG | Histogram of oriented gradients |
NCA | Neighborhood component analysis |
PCA | Principal component analysis |
CNN | Convolutional neural network |
ML | Machine learning |
SVM | Support vector machine |
DT | Decision tree |
KNN | K-nearest neighborhood |
NN | Neural network |
LR | Logistic regression |
NB | Naive bayes |
References
- Liu, B.; Ding, Z.; Tian, L.; He, D.; Li, S.; Wang, H. Grape leaf disease identification using improved deep convolutional neural networks. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kızıloluk, S. Comparison of standard and pretrained cnn models for potato, cotton, bean and banana disease detection. Naturengs 2021, 2, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kursat, M.; Yildirim, M.; Emre, I. Classification of the images (Plant-21) in the dataset created with 21 different Euphorbia Taxons with the developed AI-based hybrid model. Signal Image Video Process. 2023, 17, 4153–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Tan, C.; Li, S.; He, J.; Wang, H. A data augmentation method based on generative adversarial networks for grape leaf disease identification. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 102188–102198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Chen, X.; Pan, R.; Cao, T.; Cai, J.; Chen, Y.; Peng, X.; Cernava, T.; Zhang, X. GrapeNet: A lightweight convolutional neural network model for identification of grape leaf diseases. Agriculture 2022, 12, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padol, P.B.; Yadav, A.A. SVM classifier based grape leaf disease detection. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Advances in Signal Processing (CASP), Pune, India, 9–11 June 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Li, F.; Zheng, H.; Mu, W. UPFormer: U-sharped perception lightweight transformer for segmentation of field grape leaf diseases. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 249, 123546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karthik, R.; Vardhan, G.V.; Khaitan, S.; Harisankar, R.N.R.; Menaka, R.; Lingaswamy, S.; Won, D. A dual-track feature fusion model utilizing Group Shuffle Residual DeformNet and swin transformer for the classification of grape leaf diseases. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 14510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Li, G.; Ma, Z.; Li, X. Image recognition of plant diseases based on principal component analysis and neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2012 8th International Conference on Natural Computation, Chongqing, China, 29–31 May 2012; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 246–251. [Google Scholar]
- Kaggle. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ekahanan/manualsplit/data (accessed on 15 March 2025).
- Huang, G.; Liu, Z.; Van Der Maaten, L.; Weinberger, K.Q. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017; pp. 4700–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, M.; Le, Q. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 9–15 June 2019; pp. 6105–6114. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, J.L.; Pun, C.M. An end-to-end dense-inceptionnet for image copy-move forgery detection. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019, 15, 2134–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zhou, X.; Lin, M.; Sun, J. Shufflenet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018; pp. 6848–6856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suthaharan, S. Support vector machine. In Machine Learning Models and Algorithms for Big Data Classification: Thinking with Examples for Effective Learning; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 207–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedl, M.A.; Brodley, C.E. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1997, 61, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, G.; Wang, H.; Bell, D.; Bi, Y.; Greer, K. KNN model-based approach in classification. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE, Proceedings of the OTM Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE 2003, Catania, Sicily, Italy, 3–7 November 2003; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 986–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Féraud, R.; Clérot, F. A methodology to explain neural network classification. Neural Netw. 2002, 15, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dreiseitl, S.; Ohno-Machado, L. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: A methodology review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2002, 35, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Flach, P.A.; Lachiche, N. Naive Bayesian classification of structured data. Mach. Learn. 2004, 57, 233–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Wang, K.; Zuo, W. Fast neighborhood component analysis. Neurocomputing 2012, 83, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahonen, T.; Hadid, A.; Pietikäinen, M. Face recognition with local binary patterns. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2004, Proceedings, Part I 8, Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, Czech Republic, 11–14 May 2004; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalal, N.; Triggs, B. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), San Diego, CA, USA, 20–25 June 2005; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005; Volume 1, pp. 886–893. [Google Scholar]
- Déniz, O.; Bueno, G.; Salido, J.; De la Torre, F. Face recognition using histograms of oriented gradients. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2011, 32, 1598–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yildirim, M.; Mutlu, H.B. Automatic detection of knee osteoarthritis grading using artificial intelligence-based methods. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2024, 34, e23057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bingol, H. Classification of OME with Eardrum Otoendoscopic Images Using Hybrid-Based Deep Models, NCA, and Gaussian Method. Trait. Du Signal 2022, 39, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bugday, B.; Bingol, H.; Yildirim, M.; Alatas, B. Enhancing knee osteoarthritis detection with AI, image denoising, and optimized classification methods and the importance of physical therapy methods. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2025, 11, e2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tuncer, S.A.; Yildirim, M.; Tuncer, T.; Mülayim, M.K. YOLOv8-Based System for Nail Capillary Detection on a Single-Board Computer. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
DenseNet201 | EfficientNetb0 | InceptionV3 | ShuffleNet |
---|---|---|---|
96.67 | 88.33 | 95.83 | 95 |
DenseNet201 | EfficientNetb0 |
InceptionV3 | ShuffleNet |
Deep Model Feature Numbers | Values for Accuracy Derived from Deep Models (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DT | LR | NB | SVM | KNN | NN | |
DenseNet201 | 88.8 | 97 | 95.4 | 98.9 | 96.6 | 98.8 |
LBP | 61.3 | 85.5 | 77.1 | 87.9 | 84.6 | 84.8 |
HOG | 57.4 | 82 | 74.4 | 84.6 | 78.9 | 81.6 |
Accuracy Values Derived from ML (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DT | LR | NB | SVM | KNN | NN | |
Proposed Model | 86.8 | 97.4 | 95.5 | 99.1 | 96.8 | 98.5 |
Proposed Model |
Acc | Spc | Sens | Pre | FPR | F1 | FNR | FDR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black Measles | 99 | 99.67 | 99 | 99 | 0.33 | 99 | 1 | 1 |
Black Rot | 99 | 99.33 | 99 | 98.01 | 0.67 | 98.51 | 1 | 1.98 |
Healthy | 99.5 | 100 | 99.5 | 100 | 0 | 99.75 | 0.5 | 0 |
Isariopsis Leaf Spot | 99 | 99.83 | 99 | 99.50 | 0.17 | 99.25 | 1 | 0.5 |
Reference | Method | Number of Images | Number of Classes | Acc (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liu et al. [1] | Inception + Augmentation + Gaussian | 107366 | 7 | 97.22 |
Lin et al. [5] | CNN+ Gaussian | 2850 | 7 | 86.25 |
Padol et al. [6] | SVM | 137 | 2 | 88.89 |
Karthik et al. [8] | Swin Transformer + Group Shuffle Residual DeformNet + Augmentation | 4639 | 4 | 98.6 |
Wang et al. [9] | Back Propagation Network+ PCA + NN | 85 | 2 | 94.29 |
Proposed Model | DenseNet201 + LBP + HOG + NCA + SVM | 800 | 4 | 99.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Atesoglu, F.; Bingol, H. The Detection and Classification of Grape Leaf Diseases with an Improved Hybrid Model Based on Feature Engineering and AI. AgriEngineering 2025, 7, 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7070228
Atesoglu F, Bingol H. The Detection and Classification of Grape Leaf Diseases with an Improved Hybrid Model Based on Feature Engineering and AI. AgriEngineering. 2025; 7(7):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7070228
Chicago/Turabian StyleAtesoglu, Fatih, and Harun Bingol. 2025. "The Detection and Classification of Grape Leaf Diseases with an Improved Hybrid Model Based on Feature Engineering and AI" AgriEngineering 7, no. 7: 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7070228
APA StyleAtesoglu, F., & Bingol, H. (2025). The Detection and Classification of Grape Leaf Diseases with an Improved Hybrid Model Based on Feature Engineering and AI. AgriEngineering, 7(7), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7070228