A Hydraulic Evapotranspiration Multisensor
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Product Design and Operation
3. Results and Discussion
- When plantations have increased water requirements, because of weather conditions, irrigation frequency is increased to satisfy the demand, protecting plantations from water deficit stress.
- During cold or rainy days or other weather conditions, when water demand is reduced, the time between consecutive irrigation cycles is increased for water saving.
- HEM operates without the need for electricity of any kind, very much suited for remote plantations.
- The automatic operation based on natural processes, allows the system to operate without the need to be attended to for a long time, if there is no need to adjust the water volume required due to the plantation’s stage of development, or other reasons.
- In case the water supply is cut during irrigation, the system waits until water returns back and continues to complete the irrigation cycle, supplying also what water is due because of evaporation at the time the system was idle.
- The flow rate of the return water to the Evaporation Pan, to replace what was lost by evaporation, being transferred from that released for irrigation, is affected as the yield of the irrigation installations from pressure changes. In case of reduced pressure, irrigation time is extended to cover the loss.
4. Conclusions
5. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nikolaou, G.; Neocleous, D.; Christou, A.; Kitta, E.; Katsoulas, N. Implementing Sustainable Irrigation in Water-Scarce Regions under the Impact of Climate Change. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalias, P.; Christou, A.; Neocleous, D. Adjustment of irrigation schedules as a strategy to mitigate climate change impacts on agriculture in Cyprus. Agriculture 2019, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nikolaou, G.; Neocleous, D.; Katsoulas, N.; Kittas, C. Effect of irrigation frequency on growth and production of a cucumber crop under soilless culture. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2017, 29, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Allen, R.; Pereira, L.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998; pp. 1–289. [Google Scholar]
- Bouhoun Ali, H.; Bournet, P.-E.; Cannavo, P.; Chantoiseau, E. Development of a CFD Crop Submodel for Simulating Microclimate and Transpiration of Ornamental Plants Grown in a Greenhouse under Water Restriction. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 149, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolaou, G.; Neocleous, D.; Katsoulas, N.; Kittas, C. Irrigation of Greenhouse Crops. Horticulturae 2019, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, H.; Ma, Y. Effects of various driving factors on potential evapotranspiration trends over the main grain-production area of China while accounting for vegetation dynamics. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 250, 106854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Duan, A.-W.; Li, F.-S.; Sun, J.-S.; Wang, Y.-C.; Sun, C.-T. Drip Irrigation Scheduling for Tomato Grown in Solar Greenhouse Based on Pan Evaporation in North China Plain. J. Integr. Agric. 2013, 12, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yıldırım, M. Drip irrigation automation with a water level sensing system in a greenhouse. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2016, 26, 131–138. [Google Scholar]
- Gençoğlan, C.; Gençoğlan, S.; Usta, S. Designing Class A Pan Automation System (CAPAS) Based on Programmable Logic Control (PLC) And Testing. J. Agric. Fac. Gaziosmanpasa Univ. 2021, 38, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Irrigation Frequency (Days) | Irrigation Duration (Minutes) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 150 | |
1 | 21 | 10.5 | 5.3 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
1.5 | 31.5 | 15.8 | 7.9 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
2 | 42 | 21 | 10.5 | 7 | 5.3 | 4.2 |
2.5 | 52.5 | 26.3 | 13.1 | 8.8 | 6.6 | 5.3 |
3 | 63 | 31.5 | 15.8 | 10.5 | 7.9 | 6.3 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kypris, D.; Nikolaou, G.; Evangellides, E.; Neocleous, D. A Hydraulic Evapotranspiration Multisensor. AgriEngineering 2022, 4, 1164-1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4040072
Kypris D, Nikolaou G, Evangellides E, Neocleous D. A Hydraulic Evapotranspiration Multisensor. AgriEngineering. 2022; 4(4):1164-1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4040072
Chicago/Turabian StyleKypris, Dedalos, Georgios Nikolaou, Eustathios Evangellides, and Damianos Neocleous. 2022. "A Hydraulic Evapotranspiration Multisensor" AgriEngineering 4, no. 4: 1164-1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4040072
APA StyleKypris, D., Nikolaou, G., Evangellides, E., & Neocleous, D. (2022). A Hydraulic Evapotranspiration Multisensor. AgriEngineering, 4(4), 1164-1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4040072