You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Smart Cities
  • Review
  • Open Access

1 April 2020

Big Data for Natural Disasters in an Urban Railroad Neighborhood: A Systematic Review

,
and
1
Polytechnic (Engineering) School, University of São Paulo–PTR–EPUSP, São Paulo 05508-070, Brazil
2
Investigations, Risks and Natural Disasters Section, Center for Geoenvironmental Technologies, Institute for Technological Research–Sirden–CTGeo–IPT, São Paulo 05508-901, Brazil
3
Institute of Energy and Environment, University of São Paulo–IEEUSP, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Geographic Knowledge Discovery and Big Data Analytics in Smart Cities

Abstract

Landslides and floods are among the most common disasters in Brazil and are responsible for losses on social, environmental, and economic scales, even resulting in deaths. Floods can negatively affect the structure and operations of a railway network, causing travel delays, train service cancellations, and major fines for the railway. The objective of this article is to conduct a bibliographic review of what is available in publications on natural disasters, particularly landslides and floods, big data techniques, and railroads, at international and national levels. A bibliometric analysis was carried out according to the “PRISMA Flow Diagram” guidelines. The analysis in this study was conducted through searches of the following reference databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, and Google Scholar. After the keyword search was completed, the absence of available data and references relating to Brazil was verified. This justified the development of this and other related papers, and the efforts necessary to turn these data into useful information for the managers of cities and environmental institutions. The aim of this study is to fill the gap in the research, focusing on Brazil, related to big data, smart cities, and natural disasters (particularly, landslides and floods), and to propose other papers that can be developed in this subject area.

1. Introduction

Landslides and floods are among the most common disasters in Brazil, and they are responsible for social, environmental, and economic damage, often resulting in loss of life [1,2]. It is necessary to define the time, location, and severity of the impacts of natural disasters in order to develop mitigation techniques, appropriate responses, and firm recovery plans [3].
Railway infrastructure is crucial for transportation and contributes to economic and social welfare [4]. However, transportation is subject to frequent natural disasters, such as floods, earthquakes, and landslides [5].
Climate change has provoked an increase in rainfall, generating concern that tornados and floods have also increased [5]. While expanding civil-engineering infrastructure projects, the capacity of resistance of these structures, in relation to external forces such as natural disasters, should be verified [6].
Rivers may also overflow, depending on the duration of the rainfall, which can flow to the roads and railroads [6]. Floods can negatively affect the structure and operation of a railroad network, including travel delays, service cancelations, and major fines to the railroad company because of the delay [7,8].
Floods may adversely affect the structure and operations of a rail network, causing travel delays, cancellation of train services, and large fines for rail transportation because of lost time [7,8]. Detecting sections of the railway at risk of flooding enables an effective mitigation strategy to be developed and contributes to active management [8].
Cities are increasingly concerned with specialized technologies to deal with problems related to society, ecology, morphology, and other areas [9]. The emerging concept of “Smart Cities” encourages this perspective and promotes the incorporation of sensors from big data (BD) throughout the Internet of Things (IoT).
Data has grown in scale in various fields. The data is everywhere in organizations, governments, web servers, and even in the human body [10]. In fact, there are many definitions and distinct theories relating to BD [11]. In a general sense, “big data is a term that describes great volumes of high speed, complex and variable data that require advanced technology to allow the capture, storage, distribution, management and analysis of the information” ([12], p. 10).
Applications of BD have become common in many fields, particularly for the storage and analysis of data relating to natural resources. However, there is a lack of articles considering Brazil and specific application of flood data, inundation, and landslides associated with railways.
Data from remote sensing is one of the main sources of information for the monitoring and detection of natural disasters. This is because effective management can be achieved through multi-temporal remotely detected images, and increases are coverage normally limited by physical survey methods. Such images help decision-makers to understand the causes of the incident and implement mitigation strategies. The second main source of BD for disaster detection is user-generated content, such as websites and volunteered geographic information (VGI) [13].
To evaluate the damage of a disaster, human-generated visual interpretation from satellites can be time-intensive, imprecise, and expensive. However, the algorithms of machine learning are able to adapt and learn the problem regardless of statistic suppositions of the data distribution, presenting a greater degree of accuracy in relation to the traditional method of detection and classification [13].
However, despite [14] discussing the question about how to write a literature review paper (LRP) and stressing the primary importance of adding value, rather than only providing an overview, they defined an LRP as a journal paper that provides a comprehensive overview of (or a selection of) the literature in a specific area, bringing together the material in a clearly structured way, and adding value through coming to some interesting conclusions.
In a similar way, this article intends to add value by identifying where gaps exist in the current academic papers joining the subjects of landslide/flood, big data/smart cities, and remote sensing, mainly in the case of Brazil. For systematic reviews, there is a trend towards including information on how the literature was searched (database, keywords, time limits) [15].
The objective of this article is to present a bibliographic review of what is available in publications on natural disasters, particularly landslides and floods, BD techniques, railroads, at an international and national level. A bibliometric analysis was carried out according to the “PRISMA Flow Diagram” guidelines. The analysis of this study was made through the search of reference databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, and Google Scholar.
The remainder of this article is structurated as follows. Section 2 presents material and methods, indicating how the literature was searched. Section 3, the results of our search, and Section 4 discusses their relevance. Section 5 concludes the paper.

2. Materials and Methods

A bibliometric analysis was made to determine the frequency of the terms BD publications, machine learning, natural disasters, and railways. The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines according to the “PRISMA Flow Diagram”. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes) Statement is a method developed for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions [16].
Although the PRISMA Statement was originally created for reviews of health care interventions, studies from different subject areas have also used this method to develop systematic reviews. When searching for the term “Prisma Statement” in the “Article Title, Abstract, Keywords” field in Scopus, the filter “by subject area” shows the majority of the studies that used this method for systematic reviews belong to the health area (2506), but they can also be related to other subject areas such as agricultural and biological sciences (86), social sciences (62), multidisciplinary (60), engineering (50), environmental science (33), computer science (20), materials science (11), arts and humanities (8), business management and accounting (8), decision sciences (6), economics, econometrics and finance (6), mathematics (6), chemistry (4), physics and astronomy (3), energy (2) and earth and planetary sciences (1).
The PRISMA Statement consists of a flow diagram and a 27-item checklist. This review process consists of the four stages of the PRISMA flow diagram: Identification (where it shows the number of records identified through database searching and also the number of additional records identified through others sources), Screening (where the records duplicated are removed and the number of records screened are identified and, at the same time, the number of records excluded), Eligibility (points the number of full-text articles assessed for eligibility and, consequently, the number of full-text articles excluded, with reasons) and finally, Included (presents the number of studies included in qualitative synthesis and, later, the number of studies in quantitative synthesis) [16].
The analysis for this study was made through searches of references on the following databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, and Google Scholar. Keywords were chosen that referred to the study theme (BD, natural disasters, landslides, and floods), techniques that can be used for BD analysis (machine learning, spatial analysis, remote sensing, and GIS), and collaborative terms to the study area (railway and railroad). The Scopus database search used the fields “Article Title, Abstract, Keywords”, whereas, with Web of Science, Scielo and Google Scholar, only the “Title” field was used.
The search strategy used a structured form with the terms “Natural Disasters”, or “Landslides”, or “Floods” in the field “Title words”, joined (or not) with the secondary terms “Big Data”, “Machine Learning”, “Spatial Analysis”, “Remote Sensing”, “GIS”, “Railway”, “Railroad”, and the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR”. In the first stage (Identification), the number of records identified on the search was obtained, in addition to the number of additional records identified by other sources. Following this, the duplicated records were removed. In the second stage (Screening), the published records between 2008 and 2019 were selected, considering the languages: Portuguese, English, and Spanish. The studies that did not meet these criteria were excluded. The third stage (Eligibility) was built upon the articles with full texts, which were evaluated by their eligibility. The adopted eligibility criteria were based on article relevance: first, we selected the 20 most relevant articles, then, we selected those that featured abstracts, objectives, and conclusions that were close to the study theme, which were consequently useful to the research.
Articles were classified according to relevancy and placed in descending order from most to least relevant. The classification system considered how many of the search terms were found in each record. Studies with the highest classification appeared at the top of the list [17]. The fourth stage (Inclusion) first considered the number of studies included in the qualitative synthesis and then the number of studies in the quantitative synthesis. The papers/studies were included when a description of techniques (BD, machine learning, remote sensing (RS), geographic information systems (GIS); abbreviations found in Table 2) were found, and applied to risk management or the studies of floods and landslides.

3. Results

In the Identification stage, 35,952 records were found with the keyword search in the database as well as 23 additional records from books, documents, and official websites (adding up to a total of 35,975 publications). Subsequently, 121 duplicated searches were removed, resulting in 35,940 records.
From the screening stage, a filter was applied to return only studies published between 2008 and 2019, and another filter for those in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. These filters reduced the total records to 23,959 (besides the additional 23), removing 11,981 from the previous stage. In the eligibility stage, the 20 most relevant records were used as criteria to determine studies in which the whose abstract, objectives, and conclusion were most similar to the research theme. Thus, 23,801 records were excluded because they were unrelated to the theme of this study, producing a final 158 results (Table 1).
Table 1. Number of records obtained in the database in each stage of the bibliometric analysis. Source: the authors, 2020.
The final stage comprises the studies in the research. After a qualitative analysis and a quantitative synthesis, 90 references were included in the research (67 database records and 23 additional records). In the qualitative analysis, it was noted that there are many articles relating to the identification of natural disasters, mainly landslides and floods, but there are still a limited number of studies relating to the application of BD techniques for the analysis of natural disasters, particularly in reference to railroads. There is still a lack of knowledge concerning the geospatial information in BD environments, particularly relating to natural disasters and rail transportation.
For the quantitative analysis, the number of records used refering to the theme of this study in the Scopus database were dated between 2008 and 2019, and were in all languages. In the search field for “Article Title, Abstract, Keywords”, the terms “Natural Disasters AND Big Data” were used in addition to “Natural Disaster AND Machine Learning”, “Natural Disasters AND Remote Sensing”, or “Natural Disasters AND GIS”, “Natural Disasters AND Railway”, or “Natural Disasters AND Railroad”. Regarding natural disasters, BD and ML had an increase in searches on the subjects since 2008, with a peak in 2019 (135 quotes). When compared to the subjects of Natural Disasters (ND), RS, and GIS, it is notable there were many searches in this area, but also an increase in the number of articles (148 in 2008 and 255 in 2019). With regards to the subject of natural disasters and railroads, a few studies appear in later years, with fewer publications in 2010 (3) and most searches in 2014 (22) (Table 2). Therefore, there is a growth in the period between 2008 and 2019, with a peak in 2018.
Table 2. Number of records located in the Scopus database from 2008 to 2019. Source: the authors, 2020.
The Scopus database was searched to determine which countries had publications on the theme of study in recent years. The field “Article Title, Abstract, Keywords” was used again, with the terms “Natural disasters”, “Smart cities” and “Big data” through the operator “AND”. We then applied the “Country/Territory” filter, which indicates the countries with the most publications and considers the location of all authors of each study. All languages were considered since the first publication in 2014, resulting in a total of 19 records that represents 24 countries. The majority of the studies were conducted in the United States and Indonesia, followed by Taiwan (Table 3).
Table 3. Number of Scopus records related to the subject of study sorted by country the research was conducted. Source: the authors, 2020.
Using the Scopus database (between 2008 and 2019, in Portuguese, English, and Spanish), the search contained the keywords “Big Data”, “Natural Disasters”, “Floods”, or “Landslides” in the field search “Article Title, Abstract, Keywords”. “Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Including Subseries Lectures Notes in Artificial Intelligence, and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics” published the most returned articles for natural disasters (14) and floods (21), while the “International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences ISPRS Archives” contained the most for landslides (5 published articles). The same search was applied, adding the term “Railway”. The results were restricted, returning one article, published on the “2017 29th Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC)”.

5. Conclusions

This database review has verified that there is a lack of references on the relevant subjects, especially in Brazil. Further studies on the subjects would be very useful for urban mobility because, especially in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo in the state of São Paulo in Brazil, there are occurrences of landslides and floods on railway lines that interrupt the circulation of trains.
This justifies the development of this paper and similar studies related to the availability and quality of data, and the necessary effort to turn these data into useful information for city managers and environmental institutions. There is also a lack of research examining the landscape and the spatial data in the BD environment in relation to natural disasters such as floods and landslides.
According to the study, objectives identified in this review is necessary to highlight this gap in research through an international and national bibliographic review. The aim of the paper is to address the lack of research, particularly in Brazil, related to BD, smart cities, and natural disasters. This is particularly focused on landslides and floods, and the paper proposes that other papers can be developed in the line presented herein.
This manuscript is useful in two respects: presenting the current state of the literature on the topic in question (use of BD methods for studying impacts of natural disasters on railroad infrastructure), and also introducing non-biomedical researchers to the PRISMA guidelines and showing how they can be implemented in a systematic review for topics related to smart cities instead of health care.

Author Contributions

T.P.C. has made a significant individual contribution in defining and applying the design methodology, in software applications, formal analysis, writing the original draft, and reviewing and editing; A.C.C. is a fundamental contributor in supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, conceptualization, design methodology, writing the original draft, and reviewing and editing; J.A.Q. worked on supervision, funding acquisition, conceptualization and methodology design, resource identification, writing the original draft, and reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) grant number 2018/21279-7.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the financial, intellectual, and facilities support of The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (Process 2018/21279-7), the Institute for Technological Research (IPT) (Process 2017/50343-2), the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the scholarship (Process 304037/2015-0), and the Polytechnic (Engineering) School of University of São Paulo (EPUSP). The authors would also like to thank the suggestions of the reviewers of the Smart Cities journal and the publisher MDPI, and we would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kirschbaum, D.; Stanley, T. Satellite-Based Assessment of Rainfall-Triggered Landslide Hazard for Situational Awareness. Earth’s Future 2018, 6, 505–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brasil. Ministério da Integração Nacional, Secretaria Nacional de Proteção e Defesa Civil, Centro Nacional de Gerenciamento de Riscos e Desastres. Anuário Brasileiro de Desastres Naturais: 2013. Available online: http://www.mi.gov.br/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=fee4007a-ab0b-403e-bb1a-8aa00385630b&groupId=10157 (accessed on 30 January 2020).
  3. CRED/USAID—Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters/United States Agency for International Development. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2017. 2018. Available online: https://www.cred.be/annual-disaster-statistical-review-2017 (accessed on 30 January 2020).
  4. Cheetham, M.; Chirouze, F.; Bredier, L. RISK VIP: Evaluation of Flood Risk on the French Railway Network Using an Innovative GIS Approach. E3S Web Conf. 2016, 7, 10004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hong, L.; Ouyang, M.; Peeta, S.; He, X.; Yan, Y. Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2015, 137, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ota, N. Problems Related to and Approaches for Developing Countermeasures against Natural Disasters. Q. Rep. RTRI 2018, 59, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Murphy, A.T.; Gouldby, B.; Cole, S.; Moore, R.J.; Kendall, H. Real-time flood inundation forecasting and mapping for key railway infrastructure: A UK case study. E3S Web Conf. 2016, 7, 18020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kellermann, P.; Schöbel, A.; Kundela, G.; Thieken, A.H. Estimating flood damage to railway infrastructure—The case study of the March River flood in 2006 at the Austrian Northern Railway. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2015, 15, 2485–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Allam, Z.; Dhunny, Z.A. On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 2019, 89, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Sai, Z.A.; Abdullah, R.; Husin, M.H. Big Data Impacts and Challenges: A Review. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Jordan International Joint Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (JEEIT), Amman, Jordan, 9–11 April 2019; pp. 150–155. [Google Scholar]
  11. Malik, P. Governing Big Data: Principles and practices. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2013, 57, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Techamerica Foundation’s Federal Big Data Commission. Demystifying Big Data: A Practical Guide to Transforming the Business of Government. 2012. Available online: https://bigdatawg.nist.gov/_uploadfiles/M0068_v1_3903747095.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2019).
  13. Yu, M.; Yang, C.; Li, Y. Big Data in Natural Disaster Management: A Review. Geoscience 2018, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Wee, B.; Banister, D. How to Write a Literature Review Paper? Transp. Rev. 2015, 36, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roberts, A.; Stewart, G.B.; Pullin, A. Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine. Boil. Conserv. 2006, 132, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Clarivate Analytics. Opções de Classificação. 2019. Available online: https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS514B4/help/pt_BR/WOK/hs_sort_options.html (accessed on 29 December 2019).
  18. Ozaki, N.; Watanabe, T.; Fukusawa, N. Algorithm based on gustand flood forecasts for managing train operation control and passenger evacuation. QR RTRI 2018, 59, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Dos Santos, D.N.; De Oliveira, M.A.M.; Formigoni, A.; Maiellaro, J.R.; Saad, A.R.; Fernandes, M.E. River Network and the Risk of Flooding for the Railway and Subway Systems in the City of São Paulo, Brazil. J. Geol. Resour. Eng. 2016, 4, 328–334. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaiswal, P.; Van Westen, C.; Jetten, V. Quantitative assessment of landslide hazard along transportation lines using historical records. Landslides 2011, 8, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pomante, L.; Di Felice, P. WSN and GIS integration for a cost-effective real-time monitoring of landslides on railway stations and lines. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Bologna, Italy, 9–12 September 2018; pp. 396–400. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bednárik, M.; Magulová, B.; Matys, M.; Marschalko, M. Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kraľovany–Liptovský Mikuláš railway case study. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2010, 35, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mendonça, F.B.; Diniz, N.C.; Baptista, G.M.M. Aplicação de técnicas de SIG na avaliação de risco de deslizamento em trecho do trem de alta velocidade brasileiro. Revista Luso-Brasileira de Geotecnia 2012, 25–52. [Google Scholar]
  24. Freeborough, K.; Dashwood, C.; Doce, D.D.; Jessamy, G.; Brooks, S.; Reeves, H.; Abbott, S. A national assessment of landslide hazard from Outside Party Slopes to the rail network of Great Britain. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 2018, 52, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bíl, M.; Nezval, V.; Bílová, M.; Andrášik, R.; Kubeček, J. An overview of natural hazard impacts to railways and urban transportation systems. In Proceedings of the 19th EGU General Assembly Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Intrieri, E.; Bardi, F.; Fanti, R.; Gigli, G.; Fidolini, F.; Casagli, N.; Costanzo, S.; Raffo, A.; Di Massa, G.; Capparelli, G.; et al. Big data managing in a landslide earlywarning system: Experience from a ground-based interferometric radar application. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 17, 1713–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, C.; Yin, K.; Cao, Y.; Ahmed, B.; Li, Y.; Catani, F.; Pourghasemi, H.R. Landslide susceptibility modeling applying machine learning methods: A case study from Longju in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Comput. Geosci. 2018, 112, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martínez–Álvarez, F.; Morales-Esteban, A. Big data and natural disasters: New approaches for spatial and temporal massive data analysis. Comput. Geosci. 2019, 129, 38–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Horita, F.; De Albuquerque, J.P.; Marchezini, V.; Mendiondo, E. Bridging the gap between decision-making and emerging big data sources: An application of a model-based framework to disaster management in Brazil. Decis. Support Syst. 2017, 97, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ragini, J.R.; Anand, P.R.; Bhaskar, V. Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 42, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, M.; Mao, S.; Liu, Y. Big Data: A Survey. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2014, 19, 171–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, E. An integrated GIS platform architecture for spatiotemporal big data. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 94, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Restrepo-Estrada, C.; Andrade, S.C.; Abe, N.; Fava, M.C.; Mendiondo, E.; De Albuquerque, J.P. Geo-social media as a proxy for hydrometeorological data for streamflow estimation and to improve flood monitoring. Comput. Geosci. 2018, 111, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cian, F.; Marconcini, M.; Ceccato, P. Normalized Difference Flood Index for rapid flood mapping: Taking advantage of EO big data. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2018, 209, 712–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Akter, S.; Wamba, S.F. Big data and disaster management: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Ann. Oper. Res. 2017, 283, 939–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Selamat, N.S. An Overview of Big Data Usage in Disaster Management. J. Inf. Syst. Res. Innov. 2017, 11, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dereli, T.; Çelik, N.; Çetinkaya, C. A Literature Review on Big Data and Social Media Usage in Disaster Management. Afet ve Risk Derg. 2018, 1, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Arslan, M.; Roxin, A.; Cruz, C.; Ginhac, D. A Review on Applications of Big Data for Disaster Management. In Proceedings of the 2017 13th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), Jaipur, India, 4–7 December 2017; pp. 370–375. [Google Scholar]
  39. Eckhardt, D.; Leiras, A. A review of required features for a disaster response system on top of a multi-criteria decision: A Brazilian perspective. Production 2018, 28, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.