Wooden Rehearsal Rooms from the Construction Process to the Musical Performance
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. The Case Study
3.1. Construction Phase
3.2. Commissioning
- Adequate room dimensions (net volume and net area);
- Appropriate net room height;
- Reverberation adapted to the goal—the reverberation time does not vary too much with the frequency;
- Control of the reflections, properly inclined surfaces, adjusting the sound diffusion and evaluating the sound-absorbing elements’ percentage;
- Avoiding flutter echo;
- Sound strength according to the sound power of the ensemble;
- Low background noise level.
3.3. The Management Phase
4. Conclusions
- Acoustic algorithms should be included in the DT platform to control the room’s acoustic properties for different rehearsal rooms, starting from the design phase, according to ISO 23591.
- Sensors and acoustic algorithms should be added to evaluate the sound power of the instruments that enters the room in real time to optimize the curtain set according to the ensemble configuration.
- The control schedule costs should include 4D and 5D simulations to optimize the building process for wooden cladding in rehearsal rooms.
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sarbu, I.; Sebarchievici, C. Aspects of indoor environmental quality assessment in buildings. Energy Build. 2013, 60, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinho, P.; Pinto, M.; Almeida, R.M.; Lopes, S.; Lemos, L. Aspects concerning the acoustical performance of school buildings in Portugal. Appl. Acoust. 2016, 106, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berglund, B.; Lindvall, T.; Schwela, D.H.; World Health Organization. Guidelines for Community Noise; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, C.; Clayton, M. BIM-based acoustic simulation Framework. In Proceedings of the 30th CIB W78 International Conference, Beijing, China, 9–12 October 2013; pp. 99–108. [Google Scholar]
- Oral, G.K.; Yener, A.K.; Bayazit, N.T. Building envelope design with the objective to ensure thermal, visual and acoustic comfort conditions. Build. Environ. 2004, 39, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 23591:2021; Acoustics—Acoustic Quality Criteria for Music Rehearsal Rooms and Spaces. International Standardization Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
- Olsen, J.G. Acoustics in rooms for music rehearsal and performance—The Norwegian experience. In Proceedings of the BNAM Proceedings, Oslo, Norway, 3–5 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
- NS 8178:2014; Acoustic Criteria for Rooms and Spaces for Music Rehearsal and Performance. Standards Norway: Oslo, Norway, 2014.
- Cairoli, M. Acoustical design of the Opera and Ballet Theatre in Astana, Kazakhstan. Appl. Acoust. 2023, 211, 109556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eastman, C.M.; Eastman, C.; Teicholz, P.; Sacks, R. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, Y.; Fang, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wang, Q.; Cheng, J. Improve indoor acoustics performance by using building information modeling. in ISARC. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Taipei, Taiwan, 28 June–1 July 2017; Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Economics: Vilnius, Lithuania, 2017; Volume 34. [Google Scholar]
- Cairoli, M.; Tagliabue, L.C. Digital Twin for Acoustics and Stage Craft Facility Management in a Multipurpose Hall. Acoustics 2023, 5, 909–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehi, S.A.; Yitmen, I. Modeling and analysis of the impact of BIM-based field data capturing technologies on automated construction progress monitoring. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 2018, 16, 1669–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eneyew, D.D.; Capretz, M.A.; Bitsuamlak, G.T. Toward Smart-Building Digital Twins: BIM and IoT Data Integration. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moretti, N.; Xie, X.; Merino, J.; Brazauskas, J.; Parlikad, A.K. An openBIM Approach to IoT Integration with Incomplete As-Built Data. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagliabue, L.C. Special Issue Cognitive Buildings. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benammar, M.; Abdaoui, A.; Ahmad, S.H.; Touati, F.; Kadri, A. A Modular loT Platform for Real-Time lndoor Air Quality Monitoring. Sensors 2018, 18, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, J.C.P.; Chen, W.; Chen, K.; Wang, Q. Data-driven predictive maintenance planning framework for MEP components based on BIM and IoT using machine learning algorithms. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zemouri, S.; Magoni, D.; Zemouri, A.; Gkoufas, Y.; Katrinis, K.; Murphy, J. An Edge Computing Approach to Explore Indoor Environmental Sensor Data for Occupancy Measurement in Office Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Kansas City, MO, USA, 16–19 September 2018; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Adeogun, R.; Rodriguez, I.; Razzaghpour, M.; Berardinelli, G.; Christensen, P.H.; Mogensen, P.E. Indoor Occupancy Detection and Estimation using Machine Learning and Measurements from an IoT LoRa-based Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS), Aarhus, Denmark, 17–21 June 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Tagliabue, L.C.; Cecconi, F.R.; Maltese, S.; Rinaldi, S.; Ciribini, A.L.C.; Flammini, A. Leveraging digital twin for sustainability assessment of an educational building. Sustainability 2021, 13, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNI EN ISO 7730:2006; Ergonomia Degli Ambienti Termici—Determinazione Analitica e Interpretazione del Benessere Termico Mediante il Calcolo Degli Indici PMV e PPD e dei Criteri di Benessere Termico Locale. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
- The European Parliament; The Council of The European Union. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/ EC (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2014, 28, L.94/65. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 3382-1:2009; Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part 1: Performance Spaces. International Standardization Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
- Chiara, L. Maria Cairoli cBIM-based energy and acoustic analysis through CVE tools. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 8228–8237. [Google Scholar]
- Tronchin, L. Variability of room acoustic parameters with thermo-hygrometric conditions. Appl. Acoust. 2021, 177, 107933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nijs, L.; de Vries, D. The young architect’s guide to room acoustics. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 2005, 26, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rindel, J.H. On the importance of sound strength in music rehearsal rooms. In Proceedings of the DAGA 2022, Stuttgart, Germany, 21–24 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Valk, M.; Nijs, L.; Heringa, P. Optimising the room acoustics for lesson and study rooms of the Conservatorium van Amsterdam. NAG J. 2006, 178, 1–11. (In Dutch) [Google Scholar]
Standard ISO 23591 | Case Study | ||
---|---|---|---|
Property | Large ensemble room | Properties | Verified property |
Number of musicians | 20 to 35 singers (N) (string orchestras) Ensemble type 30 to 80/100 | (Choirs) Ensemble type 30 to 80/100 | Yes |
Net volume | >25 × N·m3 | >25 × N·m3 under 100 <25 between 100 and 120 (choirs) | Partially verified |
Net average room height | >5 m | >8 m | Yes |
Reverberation time, without persons, according to Figure 18 | 1.4 < Tmid < 1.9 (s) | 1.3 < Tmid < 1.45 (s) | The standard lower limit is achieved only without curtains |
Configuration | Tmid | Measured G | G Suggested by the Standard (V 2500 m3) |
---|---|---|---|
E. s. UL C | 1.46 | 12.10 | 11.5 |
E. s. 1/2 C | 1.35485 | 11.40 | 10.4 |
E. s. LL C | 1.305 | 11.07 | 10.3 |
Source | Sound Power Level dB re 1 pW | Reference | Sound Power P mW |
---|---|---|---|
Singer, adult | 96 | [6] | 4.0 |
Singer, boy | 88 | [6] | 0.6 |
Singer, soprano | 97 | [6] | 5.0 |
Singer, alto | 93 | [6] | 2.0 |
Singer, tenor | 95 | [6] | 3.2 |
Singer, bass | 96 | [6] | 4.0 |
Room Configuration | Singer Quantity | n.Measured G (dB) | Total Sound Power P | Sound Level of the Ensemble |
---|---|---|---|---|
E. s. UL C | 28 | 12.1 | 99.4 | 91.1 |
E. s. 1/2 C | 11.4 | 90.4 | ||
E. s. LL C | 11.07 | 90.0 | ||
E. s. UL C | 64 | 12.1 | 227.2 | 94.7 |
E. s. 1/2 C | 11.4 | 94.0 | ||
E. s. LL C | 11.07 | 93.6 | ||
E. s. UL C | 80 | 12.1 | 284.0 | 95.6 |
E. s. 1/2 C | 11.4 | 94.9 | ||
E. s. LL C | 11.07 | 94.6 | ||
E. s. UL C | 100 | 12.1 | 426.0 | 96.6 |
E. s. 1/2 C | 11.4 | 95.9 | ||
E. s. LL C | 11.07 | 95.6 | ||
E. s. UL C | 120 | 12.1 | 426.0 | 97.4 |
E. s. 1/2 C | 11.4 | 96.7 | ||
E. s. LL C | 11.07 | 96.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cairoli, M. Wooden Rehearsal Rooms from the Construction Process to the Musical Performance. Acoustics 2024, 6, 114-133. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics6010007
Cairoli M. Wooden Rehearsal Rooms from the Construction Process to the Musical Performance. Acoustics. 2024; 6(1):114-133. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics6010007
Chicago/Turabian StyleCairoli, Maria. 2024. "Wooden Rehearsal Rooms from the Construction Process to the Musical Performance" Acoustics 6, no. 1: 114-133. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics6010007
APA StyleCairoli, M. (2024). Wooden Rehearsal Rooms from the Construction Process to the Musical Performance. Acoustics, 6(1), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics6010007