Next Article in Journal
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Fire in 2019
Previous Article in Journal
Frequency of Dynamic Fire Behaviours in Australian Forest Environments
Article

Resistance and Representation in a Wildland–Urban Interface Fuels Treatment Conflict: The Case of the Forsythe II Project in the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest

1
Environment and Society Program, Institute of Behavioral Science - UCB 483, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
2
Department of Communication, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
3
Department of Applied Mathematics, Engineering Center, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 23 November 2019 / Revised: 16 December 2019 / Accepted: 21 December 2019 / Published: 24 December 2019
Land treatments in wildland–urban interface (WUI) areas are highly visible and subject to public scrutiny and possible opposition. This study examines a contested vegetation treatment—Forsythe II—in a WUI area of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest in Colorado. An initial phase of the research found vocal opposition to Forsythe II. The purpose of the present study was to understand how well the resistance narrative represented the broader community in the WUI area affected by the Forsythe II treatments. More than one third (36%) of households responded to a census survey focused on Forsythe II, demographics, wildfire risk perceptions, and variables associated with generic land management activities and place attachment. Overall, while public opposition to Forsythe II has resulted in a nearly 25% reduction in the project’s size, the survey data demonstrate that just over a quarter of respondents (27%) opposed or strongly opposed the Forsythe II project, and the majority of survey respondents reported broad support for forest management approaches similar to those detailed in the project plans. Notably, a similar portion (28%) did not report an opinion on the project. Results include a systematic comparison of opinion/no opinion respondents. View Full-Text
Keywords: fuels treatment; social science; conflict; systematic data collection; forest management; attitudes and beliefs fuels treatment; social science; conflict; systematic data collection; forest management; attitudes and beliefs
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Brenkert-Smith, H.; Jahn, J.L.S.; Vance, E.A.; Ahumada, J. Resistance and Representation in a Wildland–Urban Interface Fuels Treatment Conflict: The Case of the Forsythe II Project in the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest. Fire 2020, 3, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3010002

AMA Style

Brenkert-Smith H, Jahn JLS, Vance EA, Ahumada J. Resistance and Representation in a Wildland–Urban Interface Fuels Treatment Conflict: The Case of the Forsythe II Project in the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest. Fire. 2020; 3(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brenkert-Smith, Hannah, Jody L.S. Jahn, Eric A. Vance, and Juan Ahumada. 2020. "Resistance and Representation in a Wildland–Urban Interface Fuels Treatment Conflict: The Case of the Forsythe II Project in the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest" Fire 3, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3010002

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop