Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Ventilation Systems in Mining Engineering: Is ZigBee WSN Technology the Best Choice?
Previous Article in Journal
Applications of Machine Learning and High-Performance Computing in the Era of COVID-19
Article

On the Use of Quality Models to Address Distinct Quality Views

1
Institute of Artificial Intelligence (IAI), Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
2
Andalusian Research Institute on Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DaSCI), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
3
Software Technology Research Laboratory (STRL), Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Christos Douligeris
Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4(3), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4030041
Received: 5 March 2021 / Revised: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 28 June 2021 / Published: 2 July 2021
Different software product quality models interpret different amounts of information, i.e., they can capture and address different manifestations of software quality. This characteristic can cause misleading statements and misunderstandings while explaining or comparing the results of software product quality assessments. A total of 23 previously identified distinct software product quality models are analysed on how they handle the abstract notion of quality, and a taxonomy on the quality manifestations that the individual software product quality models are able to capture is established. Quality models that are able to solely describe the quality manifestation of the source code are attractive due to their full automation potential through static code analysers, but their assessment results ignore a huge part of software product quality, which is the one that most impresses the end user. The manifestations of software product quality that address the behaviour of the software while it operates, or the perception of the end user with regard to the software in use, require human involvement in the quality assessment. The taxonomy contributes to interpreting the quality assessment results of different quality models by showing the possible quality manifestations that can be captured by the identified models; moreover, the taxonomy also provides assistance while selecting a quality model for a given project. The quality manifestations used for the quality measurement always need to be presented, otherwise the quality assessment results cannot be interpreted in an appropriate manner. View Full-Text
Keywords: software engineering; software product quality model; quality assessment; quality view; SQALE; ISO25010 software engineering; software product quality model; quality assessment; quality view; SQALE; ISO25010
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Galli, T.; Chiclana, F.; Siewe, F. On the Use of Quality Models to Address Distinct Quality Views. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4030041

AMA Style

Galli T, Chiclana F, Siewe F. On the Use of Quality Models to Address Distinct Quality Views. Applied System Innovation. 2021; 4(3):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4030041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galli, Tamas, Francisco Chiclana, and Francois Siewe. 2021. "On the Use of Quality Models to Address Distinct Quality Views" Applied System Innovation 4, no. 3: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4030041

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop