Next Article in Journal
A Macroscopic Charcoal and Multiproxy Record from Peat Recovered from Depression Marshes in Longleaf Pine Sandhills, Florida, USA
Previous Article in Journal
Climatically-Controlled River Terraces in Eastern Australia
Article Menu
Issue 3 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessEditorial
Quaternary 2018, 1(3), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat1030024

What If the ‘Anthropocene’ Is Not Formalized as a New Geological Series/Epoch?

Institute of Earth Sciences Jaume Almera, ICTJA, CSIC, C/ Solé i Sabarís, s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Received: 15 October 2018 / Accepted: 16 October 2018 / Published: 19 October 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [228 KB, uploaded 19 October 2018]   |   Review Reports

Abstract

In the coming years, the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) will submit its proposal on the ‘Anthropocene’ to the Subcommission of Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS) and the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) for approval. If approved, the proposal will be sent to the Executive Committee of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) for ratification. If the proposal is approved and ratified, then the ‘Anthropocene’ will be formalized. Currently, the ‘Anthropocene’ is a broadly used term and concept in a wide range of scientific and non-scientific situations, and, for many, the official acceptance of this term is only a matter of time. However, the AWG proposal, in its present state, seems to not fully meet the requirements for a new chronostratigraphic unit. This essay asks what could happen if the current ‘Anthropocene’ proposal is not formalized by the ICS/IUGS. The possible stratigraphic alternatives are evaluated on the basis of the more recent literature and the personal opinions of distinguished AWG, SQS, and ICS members. The eventual impact on environmental sciences and on non-scientific sectors, where the ‘Anthropocene’ seems already firmly rooted and de facto accepted as a new geological epoch, are also discussed. This essay is intended as the editorial introduction to a Quaternary special issue on the topic. View Full-Text
Keywords: Anthropocene; human impact; chronostratigraphy; geochronology; International Chronostratigraphic Chart; Geological Time Scale; chronostratigraphic units; series; epoch; formalization Anthropocene; human impact; chronostratigraphy; geochronology; International Chronostratigraphic Chart; Geological Time Scale; chronostratigraphic units; series; epoch; formalization
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Rull, V. What If the ‘Anthropocene’ Is Not Formalized as a New Geological Series/Epoch? Quaternary 2018, 1, 24.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Quaternary EISSN 2571-550X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top