Next Article in Journal
Lung Cancer in Poland in 1970–2004
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Efficacy of Surgical Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Department of Surgery Ntldri (1998–1999)
 
 
Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Safety of Sputum Induction in Interstitial Lung Disease

by
Małgorzata Sobiecka
* and
Jan Kuś
I Klinika Chorób Płuc, Instytutu Gruźlicy i Chorób Płuc, ul. Płocka 26, 01-138 Warszawa, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adv. Respir. Med. 2008, 76(1), 11-18; https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.27921
Submission received: 15 June 2007 / Revised: 14 December 2007 / Accepted: 14 December 2007 / Published: 14 December 2007

Abstract

Introduction: Sputum induction (SI) is a safe and effective technique to study airway inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, it has the potential to induce bronchospasm and fall in arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in some patients and the safety of the method in interstitial lung disease (ILD) has not been determined. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of SI procedure on spirometric results and SaO2 in patients with ILD. Materials and methods: We studied prospectively 59 patients (33 males, 26 females) with different ILD (36—sarcoidosis, 16—hypersensitivity pneumonitis, 7—idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis). Sputum was induced by 4 sequential 5 min inhalations of 5% saline solution and FEV1, FVC and SaO2 were measured at 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes of induction. Results: The procedure was well tolerated, and none of the patients experienced excessive bronchoconstriction, defined as a fall in FEV1 of ≥20%. Nine patients (15%) had a fall in FEV1 of ≥10% from the baseline; a drop in FVC of ≥10% from the baseline was observed in 10 subjects. The mean (SD) maximum per cent fall in FEV1 was 6.3 ± 4.4%, and in FVC—6.4 ± 4.6%. The maximum per cent fall in FEV1 did not correlate with baseline FEV1% predicted (r = −0.099). SaO2 was measured in 42 patients. There was a very small fall in SaO2 at 5, 10, 15 and 20 min of induction, although statistically significant (baseline SaO2 = 96.7 ± 1.9% vs. 95.8 ± 2.4%, p = 0.002; vs. 96.1 ± 2.2%, p = 0.0114; vs. 95.7 ± 2.4%, p = 0.0016; vs. 95.9 ± 2.0%; p = 0.0038, respectively). No significant relationship was found between fall in FEV1, FVC or SaO2 after induction and diagnosis or smoking history. Conclusions: Sputum induction is safe and well tolerated in patients with ILD.
Keywords: induced sputum; safety; sarcoidosis; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis induced sputum; safety; sarcoidosis; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sobiecka, M.; Kuś, J. Safety of Sputum Induction in Interstitial Lung Disease. Adv. Respir. Med. 2008, 76, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.27921

AMA Style

Sobiecka M, Kuś J. Safety of Sputum Induction in Interstitial Lung Disease. Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2008; 76(1):11-18. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.27921

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sobiecka, Małgorzata, and Jan Kuś. 2008. "Safety of Sputum Induction in Interstitial Lung Disease" Advances in Respiratory Medicine 76, no. 1: 11-18. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.27921

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop