Next Article in Journal
BEHAVE-UAV: A Behaviour-Aware Synthetic Data Pipeline for Wildlife Detection from UAV Imagery
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Cotton LAI and Yield Through Assimilation of the DSSAT Model and Unmanned Aerial System Images
Previous Article in Special Issue
L1 Adaptive Nonsingular Fast Terminal Super-Twisting Control for Quadrotor UAVs Under Unknown Disturbances
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Cooperative Navigation Framework for UAV Formations Using LSTM and Dynamic Model Fusion

1
The School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
2
The Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Unmanned Systems for Reliability and Digital Verification, China Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing Research Institute, The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology Key Laboratory of Quality and Reliability Engineering Technology of Civil Aircraft and Aero-Engine, and China Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing Research Institute, Guangzhou 511300, China
3
The Institute of System Engineering, China Academy of Physics Engineering, Mianyang 621900, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Drones 2026, 10(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10010028
Submission received: 13 November 2025 / Revised: 25 December 2025 / Accepted: 1 January 2026 / Published: 4 January 2026

Abstract

In GNSS-denied environments, achieving accurate and reliable positioning for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) formations remains a major challenge. This paper presents a cooperative navigation framework for UAV formations based on LSTM and dynamic model information fusion to enhance formation navigation performance under GNSS-denial. The framework employs a dual-driven hierarchical architecture that integrates an LSTM-based dynamic state predictor with historical motion features, including velocity, acceleration, airflow angle, or thrust, thereby enhancing the robustness and positioning accuracy of the leader UAV layer. Furthermore, a multi-source optimal selection strategy based on consistency evaluation is developed to dynamically fuse pseudo-GNSS (P-GNSS), barometric altitude (BA), and wind-speed consistency information, optimizing node allocation between the leader and follower layers. In addition, an IMM-based resilient fusion filtering algorithm is introduced for the follower UAV layer, incorporating UWB, wind-speed, and external-force estimations to maintain reliable navigation under UWB outages and leader-node degradation. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly improves positioning accuracy and formation stability, exhibiting strong adaptability in complex GNSS-denied environments.
Keywords: GNSS denial; dynamic model fusion; UAV formations; multi-source information fusion (MSIF); LSTM; RIEKF GNSS denial; dynamic model fusion; UAV formations; multi-source information fusion (MSIF); LSTM; RIEKF

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, F.; Zeng, Q.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, R.; Ye, X.; Zhou, H. Cooperative Navigation Framework for UAV Formations Using LSTM and Dynamic Model Fusion. Drones 2026, 10, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10010028

AMA Style

Song F, Zeng Q, Zhu X, Zhang R, Ye X, Zhou H. Cooperative Navigation Framework for UAV Formations Using LSTM and Dynamic Model Fusion. Drones. 2026; 10(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10010028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Fujun, Qinghua Zeng, Xiaohu Zhu, Rui Zhang, Xiaoyu Ye, and Huan Zhou. 2026. "Cooperative Navigation Framework for UAV Formations Using LSTM and Dynamic Model Fusion" Drones 10, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10010028

APA Style

Song, F., Zeng, Q., Zhu, X., Zhang, R., Ye, X., & Zhou, H. (2026). Cooperative Navigation Framework for UAV Formations Using LSTM and Dynamic Model Fusion. Drones, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10010028

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop