Next Article in Journal
Graphene Oxide-Based Flexible Sensors for Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds at Room Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
A Simple Method for Extracting Piezoelectric Coefficient d31 by Fitting Experimental Data with an Analytical Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Systematic Review on Biosensor Systems for COVID-19 Aerosol Detection †

by
Divya Pragna Mulla
1,*,
Mario Alessandro Bochicchio
2,3 and
Antonella Longo
1
1
Department of Innovation Engineering, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
2
Department of Computer Science, Università degli Studi di Bari, Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy
3
Global Health Security Agenda—GHSA, 00153 Roma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097203
Published: 24 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference)

Abstract

:
Timely detection and diagnosis are crucial for outbreak measures and infection control. This review discusses the types of biosensor systems developed so far for the detection of COVID-19 aerosols in the air for the risk assessment and identification of gaps in the field. Data were collected from four academic databases, including IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and MDPI. The results suggest the development of very few sensors for the aerosol detection of COVID-19, and most of the sensors are immune based.

1. Introduction

Biosensors are analytical devices that each incorporate a biological sensing element to detect a targeted analyte from complex samples. A bio detection device consists of some distinct components: a bioreceptor, a transducer, and a system for signal processing [1]. The biosensor application for risk assessment can help in alleviating the risk of transmission prior to the person’s exposure to the virus [2]. In this review, the types of biosensor systems that have been used the most for the detection of the aerosols have been discussed under the following sections: Materials and Methods; and Discussion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

From the data sources, namely IEEE, Scopus, MDPI, and Web of Science, 1691 articles were collected based on the different search strings mentioned in Table S1. Then, the articles were filtered and screened according to the research questions mentioned in Table S2.

2.2. Search Strategy and Study Selection

The selection process aimed to identify the articles most relevant to the study’s research questions with the help of the eligibility criteria mentioned in Table S3. A total of 1691 studies were reviewed from 2020, 2021, and August 2022. Each article was evaluated by two authors, who discussed its title, summary, and keywords. After finding the articles, duplicates were removed, and extensive searches were conducted to filter out unrelated publications. The focus of the research is COVID-19 aerosol detection, which is gaining interest from researchers and scientists. Figure 1 displays the study selection stages and activities during each research phase.

3. Discussion

3.1. Results Based on Types of Sensors, Geographical Distribution, and Data Sources

Figure 2 represents the types of data sources while Figure 3 depicts the different types of sensors used for aerosol detection, out of which the immunosensors are the most used compared to others. Furthermore, in terms of geographical distribution (Figure 4), the country with the highest number of articles published is the USA, while the search engines (Figure 2) with the highest number of studies are as follows: MDPI, followed by Scopus [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].

3.2. Based on Co-Occurrence of Authors and Keywords

The co-occurrence of keywords and authors, carried out by VOS viewer software network visualization, depicts the following: the most common keywords are COVID-19, followed by machine learning and predictive models (Figure 5), and the authors show five clusters of co-authorship with the threshold of four authors per article (Figure 6).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/proceedings2024097203/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.P.M. and M.A.B.; methodology, D.P.M.; validation, D.P.M., M.A.B. and A.L.; resources, D.P.M.; data curation, D.P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.P.M.; writing—review and editing, D.P.M.; visualization, D.P.M.; supervision, M.A.B. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gavrilaș, S.; Ursachi, C.Ș.; Perța-Crișan, S.; Munteanu, F.-D. Recent Trends in Biosensors for Environmental Quality Monitoring. Sensors 2022, 22, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, Z.; Mohamed, M.A.; Vinu Mohan, A.M.; Zhu, Z.; Sharma, V.; Mishra, G.K.; Mishra, R.K. Application of Electrochemical Aptasensors toward Clinical Diagnostics, Food, and Environmental Monitoring: Review. Sensors 2019, 19, 5435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Iwanaga, M. High-Sensitivity High-Throughput Detection of Nucleic Acid Targets on Metasurface Fluorescence Biosensors. Biosensors 2021, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hadi, M.U.; Khurshid, M. SARS-CoV-2 Detection Using Optical Fiber Based Sensor Method. Sensors 2022, 22, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cheng, C.-H.; Peng, Y.-C.; Lin, S.-M.; Yatsuda, H.; Liu, S.-H.; Liu, S.-J.; Kuo, C.-Y.; Wang, R.Y.L. Measurements of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels after Vaccination Using a SH-SAW Biosensor. Biosensors 2022, 12, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chang, T.-C.; Sun, A.Y.; Huang, Y.-C.; Wang, C.-H.; Wang, S.-C.; Chau, L.-K. Integration of Power-Free and Self-Contained Microfluidic Chip with Fiber Optic Particle Plasmon Resonance Aptasensor for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein. Biosensors 2022, 12, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Braz, B.A.; Hospinal-Santiani, M.; Martins, G.; Pinto, C.S.; Zarbin, A.J.G.; Beirão, B.C.B.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Bergamini, M.F.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H.; Soccol, C.R. Graphene-Binding Peptide in Fusion with SARS-CoV-2 Antigen for Electrochemical Immunosensor Construction. Biosensors 2022, 12, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, X.; Jiang, S.; Li, Z.; Lo, B. A Pervasive Respiratory Monitoring Sensor for COVID-19 Pandemic. IEEE Open J. Eng. Med. Biol. 2021, 2, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Khan, M.S.; Tariq, M.O.; Nawaz, M.; Ahmed, J. MEMS Sensors for Diagnostics and Treatment in the Fight Against COVID-19 and Other Pandemics. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 61123–61149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dias, L.M.S.; Ramalho, J.F.C.B.; Silverio, T.; Fu, L.; Ferreira, R.A.S.; Andre, P.S. Smart Optical Sensors for Internet of Things: Integration of Temperature Monitoring and Customized Security Physical Unclonable Functions. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 24433–24443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, S.; Akarapipad, P.; Nguyen, B.T.; Breshears, L.E.; Sosnowski, K.; Baker, J.; Uhrlaub, J.L.; Nikolich-Žugich, J.; Yoon, J.-Y. Direct Capture and Smartphone Quantification of Airborne SARS-CoV-2 on a Paper Microfluidic Chip. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 200, 113912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Narita, F. Design and Finite Element Simulation of Metal-Core Piezoelectric Fiber/Epoxy Matrix Composites for Virus Detection. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 327, 112742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Tang, X.; Yuen, T.T.T.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Huang, N.; Chan, J.F.W.; Chu, H.; Wang, L. Liquid Repellency Enabled Antipathogen Coatings. Mater. Today Bio 2021, 12, 100145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chaudhuri, S.; Basu, S.; Saha, A. Analyzing the Dominant SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Routes toward an Ab Initio Disease Spread Model. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32, 123306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Peddinti, B.S.T.; Downs, S.N.; Yan, J.; Smith, S.D.; Ghiladi, R.A.; Mhetar, V.; Tocchetto, R.; Griffiths, A.; Scholle, F.; Spontak, R.J. Rapid and Repetitive Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and Human Coronavirus on Self-Disinfecting Anionic Polymers. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2003503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Renninger, N.; Nastasi, N.; Bope, A.; Cochran, S.J.; Haines, S.R.; Balasubrahmaniam, N.; Stuart, K.; Bivins, A.; Bibby, K.; Hull, N.M.; et al. Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19. mSystems 2021, 6, e01350-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Masud, M.; Gaba, G.S.; Alqahtani, S.; Muhammad, G.; Gupta, B.B.; Kumar, P.; Ghoneim, A. A Lightweight and Robust Secure Key Establishment Protocol for Internet of Medical Things in COVID-19 Patients Care. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 15694–15703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Escobedo, P.; Bhattacharjee, M.; Nikbakhtnasrabadi, F.; Dahiya, R. Smart Bandage With Wireless Strain and Temperature Sensors and Batteryless NFC Tag. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 5093–5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study Selection Flow Diagram.
Figure 1. Study Selection Flow Diagram.
Proceedings 97 00203 g001
Figure 2. Types Of Data Sources.
Figure 2. Types Of Data Sources.
Proceedings 97 00203 g002
Figure 3. Types of sensors.
Figure 3. Types of sensors.
Proceedings 97 00203 g003
Figure 4. Geographical Distribution of the articles.
Figure 4. Geographical Distribution of the articles.
Proceedings 97 00203 g004
Figure 5. Co-occurrence of keywords.
Figure 5. Co-occurrence of keywords.
Proceedings 97 00203 g005
Figure 6. Co-Authoship of the authors.
Figure 6. Co-Authoship of the authors.
Proceedings 97 00203 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mulla, D.P.; Bochicchio, M.A.; Longo, A. Systematic Review on Biosensor Systems for COVID-19 Aerosol Detection. Proceedings 2024, 97, 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097203

AMA Style

Mulla DP, Bochicchio MA, Longo A. Systematic Review on Biosensor Systems for COVID-19 Aerosol Detection. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mulla, Divya Pragna, Mario Alessandro Bochicchio, and Antonella Longo. 2024. "Systematic Review on Biosensor Systems for COVID-19 Aerosol Detection" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097203

APA Style

Mulla, D. P., Bochicchio, M. A., & Longo, A. (2024). Systematic Review on Biosensor Systems for COVID-19 Aerosol Detection. Proceedings, 97(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097203

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop