Next Article in Journal
Malting of Barley and Wheat Grains Impacts Their Metabolic Profiles in a Model of In Vitro Colonic Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Synthesis of Heterostructured TiO2 for Photoanode Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Revisiting Nanotoxicology Tests—Miniaturized Approaches of Nanotoxicity Tests in Daphnids †

by
Anne Leung
1,
Emma Rowan
1,
Dimitrios Kakavas
1,
Konstantinos Panagiotidis
1,
Keith D. Rochfort
2 and
Konstantinos Grintzalis
1,*
1
School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, D09DX63 Dublin, Ireland
2
School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, D09DX63 Dublin, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Conference EcoBalt 2023 “Chemicals & Environment”, Tallinn, Estonia, 9–11 October 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 92(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023092052
Published: 27 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of International Conference EcoBalt 2023 "Chemicals & Environment")

Abstract

:
The great increase in nanotechnology in the last 20 years has led to the alarming presence of nanomaterials in the environment as a new category of pollutants. Given the fact that legislation on nanomaterials is not concrete, the monitoring of their toxicity responses remains central. Focusing on tests in aquatic environments, daphnids are commonly employed as a bioindicator species for experiments with nanomaterials. However, until now, there has not been a unified and agreed approach to nanotoxicity testing, while research among different laboratories has been performed with significantly different setups, which may affect the reproducibility of the results. In this study, daphnids were exposed to silver nanoinks and the impact of surface to volume was assessed by comparing shallow vessels such as Petri dishes with deeper exposure vessels. Furthermore, in an attempt to assess whether the tests can be performed in smaller volumes, and thus in miniaturized versions, experiments compared larger and smaller volume setups. Finally, another parameter explored was the crowding of animals in exposure, and therefore their absolute number. Mortality was affected by both surface to volume and miniaturization, and significantly with crowding, supporting the implication of the number of animals in the tests. Further investigation with molecular and phenotypic endpoints confirmed these changes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition, K.G. and K.D.R.; investigation, data acquisition, E.R., A.L., D.K. and K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by SCIENCE FOUNDATION IRELAND under grant number [18/SIRG/5563 Metabolomic approaches in mechanistic toxicology]. The IRISH RESEARCH COUNCIL supported Dimitrios Kakavas under grant number [GOIPG/2022/314 Mechanistic insight on the impact of nanomaterials and nanocoronas on freshwater and in vitro systems] and Dr. Konstantinos Panagiotidis under the grant number [GOIPD/2021/461 Nanoparticle metabolite coronas: A neglected feature with important contribution to toxicity].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to the fact that daphnids are regarded as “animals” in terms of being members of the kingdom Animalia, however, they are not “animals” as defined in regulation SI543 of 2012 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Therefore, the study does not require authorization from the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), while is also in line with the aim of working under the 3Rs (reduce, refine, replacement) strategy, since daphnids are commonly used in ecology and ecotoxicology as replacements of more evolutionary advanced species (i.e., fishes), posing no ethical implications.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the microscopy facility of Dublin City University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leung, A.; Rowan, E.; Kakavas, D.; Panagiotidis, K.; Rochfort, K.D.; Grintzalis, K. Revisiting Nanotoxicology Tests—Miniaturized Approaches of Nanotoxicity Tests in Daphnids. Proceedings 2023, 92, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023092052

AMA Style

Leung A, Rowan E, Kakavas D, Panagiotidis K, Rochfort KD, Grintzalis K. Revisiting Nanotoxicology Tests—Miniaturized Approaches of Nanotoxicity Tests in Daphnids. Proceedings. 2023; 92(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023092052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leung, Anne, Emma Rowan, Dimitrios Kakavas, Konstantinos Panagiotidis, Keith D. Rochfort, and Konstantinos Grintzalis. 2023. "Revisiting Nanotoxicology Tests—Miniaturized Approaches of Nanotoxicity Tests in Daphnids" Proceedings 92, no. 1: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023092052

APA Style

Leung, A., Rowan, E., Kakavas, D., Panagiotidis, K., Rochfort, K. D., & Grintzalis, K. (2023). Revisiting Nanotoxicology Tests—Miniaturized Approaches of Nanotoxicity Tests in Daphnids. Proceedings, 92(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023092052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop