Abstract
Beer is the most widely consumed alcoholic beverage in Europe. In many occasions, its consumption is linked to social relations and a fruitive use. To comply with this, the market should offer gluten-free beers that are safe to be consumed by people with celiac disease or those who need to avoid gluten. Brewing hydrolyzes gluten, and this compels the analytical determination of this hydrolyzed protein to be carried out using a competitive ELISA method. The most commonly used competitive ELISA for this purpose is based on the R5 antibody, which has some disadvantages, such as less robustness compared to the homologous sandwich ELISA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the R5-based competitive ELISA through detecting gluten in beers that intended to achieve a gluten-free label. Thirty-seven samples of beers in which gluten was detected (range 10–80 mg/kg gluten) were analyzed under intermediate precision conditions (e.g., different days and different analysts). Each sample was analyzed 3–20 times. A total of 185 tests were performed and statistically analyzed. The mean calculation of the relative standard deviation (RSD) has a median of 13.6% (range 2.1–23.4%). The samples were pooled according to their gluten content (expressed as mg/kg or ppm gluten) and the median for each interval as follows: beers containing 10–20 ppm (n = 9): RSD 16.1% (range 2.7–19.9%); 21-40 ppm (n = 20): RSD 12.7% (range 2.8–21.5%); and 41–140 ppm (n = 8): RSD 13.7% (range 2.1–23.4%). The main variability in precision was found in the samples with a low gluten content, close to the limit of quantification. This could be due to the fact that small differences in the measured absorbances in this range make a significant difference in quantification. Our results suggest that the precision of the assayed method in our laboratory was satisfactory, in line with the expectable results of other ELISA methods. An internal reproducibility of 20% could be a reliable limit for any testing laboratory. Without evaluating other factors such as accuracy, the data findings point to an elevated uncertainty value for this analytical method.
Author Contributions
M.B., J.M. and E.S. conceived and designed the study; M.d.P.F.-G. and J.E. participated in the recruitment and analysis of the samples; M.d.P.F.-G., M.B. and J.M. collected and revised the data; O.M. and E.S. contributed in statistical analysis; E.S. drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the grant from the Basque Government as a part of the “Farm to Table Research Plan 2022–2026”. The GLUTEN3S research group is financed by a grant (GIU18/78, GIU21/053) from the UPV/EHU, and it is recognized by the Basque Government (IT-1419-19).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).