Next Article in Journal
Herbal Medicines and Dietary Supplements’ Usage and Beliefs among UK Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Cultural Adaptation of a Text Message Library Designed to Support Diet, Activity and Weight Management Behaviour in the Postpartum Period in the UK: The Supporting MumS (SMS) Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Bioactives and Other Nutritional Components in the Jaggery Production Process †

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 320; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091320
Published: 17 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)

Abstract

:
Jaggery, a non-centrifugal sugar (NCS), is a naturally produced sweetener and a good source of minerals, essential vitamins and bioactives. Jaggery manufacturing is a continuous heat and mass transfer process which involves various unit operations and in which the effectiveness of juice clarification plays an important role in maintaining the nutritional quality and storage life of jaggery. The major components of nutritional interest in NCSs are minerals and bioactives and they are gaining worldwide attention due to their nutraceutical properties. Hence, there is a need to quantify the nutrients present in NCSs as well as assess their biological absorption and function. This work aims to study the potential flow of materials within a jaggery processing unit by combining sampling, analysis and quantification. Sugarcane juice, clarified juice, scum and jaggery were analyzed for their total sugars, total phenolic and flavonoid content, mineral content and antioxidant potential to clearly understand at which step of jaggery manufacturing nutritional losses take place, if at all. A profiling of phenolic and flavonoid compounds was conducted using liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy. The total ash content in raw cane juice, scum and jaggery was found to be in the range of 0.1–0.4%, 1–3% and 1–2% (dry basis), respectively. It was found that almost half of the mineral contents from sugarcane juice were lost in scum (p < 0.05). All the mineral elements showed a similar affinity towards scum. However, through liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy, it was seen that most of the polyphenols (75%) that positively influence human health, such as oryzarol, hydrocinnamic acids, gentisic acid, hydrobenzoic acids, etc., were retained in jaggery. The same could be validated when looking at the total phenolic and flavonoid contents of sugarcane juice, scum and jaggery along with their antioxidant potential. Some unreported phenolics and flavonoids, such as isoferulic acid, prunitrin and maritimetin, which are known to have anti-inflammatory properties, were detected in selected NCS samples. In order to retain maximum mineral content in jaggery and to ensure the removal of appropriate amounts of scum, technological upgrades must be studied and the clarification step must be optimized and standardized.

Author Contributions

N.P.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis. N.D.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing. S.M.: Conceptualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing—review & editing. N.S.: Conceptualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing—review & editing. A.A.: Conceptualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Rajiv Gandhi Science & Technology Commission, Government of Maharashtra. Grant number: RGSTC/File-2020/DPP-236/CR-19.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Restrictions apply to the availability of this data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pujari, N.; Dedhia, N.; Mahajani, S.; Shah, N.; Arora, A. Bioactives and Other Nutritional Components in the Jaggery Production Process. Proceedings 2023, 91, 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091320

AMA Style

Pujari N, Dedhia N, Mahajani S, Shah N, Arora A. Bioactives and Other Nutritional Components in the Jaggery Production Process. Proceedings. 2023; 91(1):320. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091320

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pujari, Nisha, Nirali Dedhia, Sanjay Mahajani, Narendra Shah, and Amit Arora. 2023. "Bioactives and Other Nutritional Components in the Jaggery Production Process" Proceedings 91, no. 1: 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091320

APA Style

Pujari, N., Dedhia, N., Mahajani, S., Shah, N., & Arora, A. (2023). Bioactives and Other Nutritional Components in the Jaggery Production Process. Proceedings, 91(1), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091320

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop