Next Article in Journal
More Thorough Mastication of Bread May Stimulate Early-Phase Insulin Release: Preliminary Associative Results from a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Dietary Choline and the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: Results from a Large Swedish Cohort
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Social Network and Sentiment Analysis of the #Nutrition Discourse on Twitter †

School of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091301
Published: 8 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)

Abstract

:
Social media platforms allow people to share information, connect, and build networks at an unprecedented scale with positive and negative consequences. Social network analysis (SNA) applies mathematical network and graph theory to visualise information transfer as relational networks of connected nodes. Measuring node connectivity (centrality) permits the identification of ‘influencers’. SNA has been applied to analyse the spread of misinformation on Twitter (1), but to date, no research has examined nutrition networks. Therefore, this study examined the #Nutrition conversations on Twitter utilising SNA and linguistic analyses. English language tweets including ‘#Nutrition’ on 1–21 March 2023 were collected using the SNA tool, NodeXL Pro (Network Overview for Discovery and Exploration in Excel) (2). SNA is a multistep process that calculates graph metrics and develops a network graph to measure the relationships between users. SNA also identifies semantically related words, hashtags, and word pairs and identifies the sentiment of words used, as measured against the Opinion Lexicon (2). The #Nutrition network included 17,129 vertices (users) with 26,809 unique edges (connections); edges with duplicates were merged. The network density was low, suggesting that most users communicate heavily with a small number of users. The average geodesic distance between any two users was 5.26, revealing a dispersed online discussion. SNA identified the top 10 influencers in this network, measured by high betweenness centrality (23,375,543–5,207,998). Influential users were from a mix of accounts including personal, online blogs, and government organisations. High betweenness centrality identified the users with the greatest influence, acting as bridges between network groups and therefore amplifying #Nutrition messages. Sentiment analysis found the discourse was more positive (0.047, 22,218 words) than negative (0.015, 6795 words). Semantic analysis calculated the total words, 468,191, and identified the most frequently used words in the tweets: #nutrition, #health, food, more, nutrition, health, #diet, #healthylifestlye, #fitness, and #food. Social network analysis shows the discourse on Twitter relating to #Nutrition is dispersed without clear polarising views. Semantic analysis showed that ‘health’ was the main topic discussed in relation to nutrition in this network and was most frequently associated with #Nutrition. The narrative was positively framed, as identified through sentiment analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H.E., C.E.L.E. and J.B.M.; methodology, C.H.E.; software, C.H.E.; formal analysis, C.H.E.; data curation, C.H.E.; writing—original draft preparation, C.H.E.; writing—review and editing, C.H.E.; supervision, C.E.L.E. and J.B.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are still be analysed for the full manuscript and is therefore not yet available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ellis, C.H.; Evans, C.E.L.; Moore, J.B. Social Network and Sentiment Analysis of the #Nutrition Discourse on Twitter. Proceedings 2023, 91, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091301

AMA Style

Ellis CH, Evans CEL, Moore JB. Social Network and Sentiment Analysis of the #Nutrition Discourse on Twitter. Proceedings. 2023; 91(1):301. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ellis, Cassandra H., Charlotte E. L. Evans, and J. Bernadette Moore. 2023. "Social Network and Sentiment Analysis of the #Nutrition Discourse on Twitter" Proceedings 91, no. 1: 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091301

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop