Next Article in Journal
A Program Evaluation Framework for P/CVE
Previous Article in Journal
Dealing with Ethical Issues in Countering Violent Extremism (CVE): An Exploration of Concepts and Tools to Support CVE Programs and Practitioners
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Traditional versus Developmental Evaluation †

Community Safety Branch, Emergency Preparedness Research Evaluation & Practice (EPREP) Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 90 Smith Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Presented at the Global Safety Evaluation Workshop, Online, 1 July–31 December 2020.
Proceedings 2021, 77(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077004
Published: 23 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Global Safety Evaluation (GSE) Network Workshop)

Abstract

:
When evaluating the effectiveness of public health, and behavioral and medical interventions, various methods can be used to systematically judge the merit, worth, value, and significance of the program’s outcomes. This presentation will describe what is meant by “evaluation approaches” by providing examples of the characteristics of several different types of approaches, such as, the appreciative inquiry, beneficiary assessment and case study approaches. The presentation will then focus on introducing the developmental evaluation approach by comparing it to the traditional evaluation approach in terms of its purpose, the evaluator’s role, accountability, measurement, and results. Examples of the causal inference pathways underlying the developmental and traditional approaches will illustrate how developmental approaches can accommodate multivariable and multivariate models, this can be used to evaluate the intricacies of complex real-world problems and programs.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Testa, M.A. Traditional versus Developmental Evaluation. Proceedings 2021, 77, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077004

AMA Style

Testa MA. Traditional versus Developmental Evaluation. Proceedings. 2021; 77(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Testa, Marcia A. 2021. "Traditional versus Developmental Evaluation" Proceedings 77, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021077004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop