Next Article in Journal
Single Drop Detection of Furfural in Wine by an SPR-Optical Fiber-MIP Based Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Biosensor Technology in Diagnostics and Mechanistic Studies of Epilepsy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Polymeric Magnetic Microparticles as Electrochemical Immunosensing Platforms †

by
Celia Toyos-Rodríguez
*,
Francisco Javier García-Alonso
and
Alfredo de la Escosura-Muñiz
NanoBioAnalysis Group-Department of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, University of Oviedo, Julián Clavería 8, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 2–17 November 2020; Available online: https://iecb2020.sciforum.net/.
Proceedings 2020, 60(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07034
Published: 2 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Biosensors)

Abstract

:
Magnetic microparticles (MMPs) have been notably used as platforms in biosensing. Due to their magnetic behavior, they simplify purification and separation procedures, reducing time of analysis. They also allow sample preconcentration, minimizing matrix effects, which is of key relevance for applications using real samples. Even though there is a great number of commercially available MMPs, their performance is not always reliable. In this work, we propose the synthesis of novel polymeric MMPs for their use as electrochemical immunosensing platforms. Initially, magnetic nanoparticles of a diameter of 12 ± 2 nm and a saturation magnetization of 70 emu/g were synthesized and characterized. Then, they were encapsulated in a polymeric matrix of poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA), generating MMPs with a diameter of 90 ± 18 nm. Later, MMPs were functionalized with polyethyleneimine (PEI) as an intermediate step for the immobilization of affinity proteins or antibodies, necessary in electrochemical immunosensing. This would allow the obtaining of MMPs comparable to the commercially available ones but possessing higher saturation magnetization. The use of such MMPs could facilitate the detection of analytes of interest in diagnostics, among other applications.

1. Introduction

Magnetic particles (MPs) have been widely used over the last years in analytical detection techniques such as bioimaging, drug delivery [1], wastewater treatment [2] or biosensing [3] due to their high binding capacity and magnetic properties [4]. In this broad range of applications, properties such as size or magnetic moment (m) of MPs is crucial, as it is coercivity or remanent magnetization [5]. Regarding size, this parameter is of concern, especially in biomedicine in which a size lower than 100 nm is required to avoid phagocytosis and liver and spleen accumulation [6]. However, in biosensing, larger MPs are preferred owing to an increased magnetization that facilitates separation of biomolecules.
Two main types of MPs are used for such applications: magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), of a diameter from 5–100 nm, and magnetic microparticles (MMPs) of 1–5 µm.
MNPs are mainly composed of iron oxides as magnetite (Fe3O4) that present a low toxicity and stability under extreme conditions [7]. In addition, MNPs are generally synthesized in a diameter size lower than 20 nm, permitting a superparamagnetic behavior, which is essential for assuring an appropriate tracking of the particles in the presence of an external magnetic field [8] while minimizing aggregation.
However, size reduction entails a decrease in the m of the MPs, which affects their usefulness. To counter this point, MMPs have been proposed as an alternative, allowing the obtention of an increased m due to the greater amount of magnetic material per particle [9].
Colloidally assembled MMPs have been proposed for maintaining superparamagnetic behavior and getting an increased m. These MMPs are characterized by consisting on the encapsulation of MNPs of high m into polymeric matrices [10]. These MMPs can be obtained by different ways, ranging from polymer encapsulation [11] to emulsion-based bottom-up assembly [10].
In this work, MMPs have been obtained by polymer encapsulation, using magnetite nanoparticles and poly (d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) as encapsulation polymer. MNPs of magnetite with a high m have been obtained by thermal-decomposition and used as magnetic seeds, while PLGA has been selected due to its biocompatibility and its facility for further functionalization, which is essential for its use as biosensing platforms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Benzyl ether (C14H14O, 98%), oleic acid (C18H34O2, 99.9%) iron (III) acetylacetonate (C15H21FeO6, 97%), Resomer® RG 503 H, Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) ([C3H4O2]x[C2H2O2]y, 50:50, Mw 24.000–38.000), Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) ([-CH2CHOH-]n, Mw 40,000–70,000 87–90% hydrolyzed) and Polyethyleneimine (PEI) (H(NHCH2CH2)nNH2, Mw~25,000) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Petroleum ether (40°–60°), 2-Propanol (C3H8O, 99.9%) and dichloromethane (DCM) (CH2Cl2, 99.8%) were obtained from VWR. Oleylamine (C18H37N, 80–90%) was supplied by Acros Organics.

2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of MNPs

MNPs were synthesized following a previously published procedure [12]. Briefly, Fe(acac)3 was dispersed in a mixture of dibenzyl ether, oleylamine and oleic acid. The mixture was placed in a three-necked round-bottom flask and heated with vigorous mechanical stirring, refrigeration and inert atmosphere until reflux; then the heating was maintained for 15 min under the same conditions. Afterwards, heating was removed, and the reaction was maintained at vigorous stirring for 15 min more, to later reconnect the heating source and maintain the reaction under reflux for 2 h. After that, heating was removed again, and the reaction was maintained under stirring for 30 min more until cooled down. The resultant particles were purified by washing with a mixture 1:1 in volume of 2-propanol and light petroleum ether using an external magnetic disk and dried under vacuum. Dried particles were reconstituted in 2-propanol at a concentration of ~100 mg/mL.
The as-synthesized nanoparticles were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL2000 EXII TEM, using a copper grid and an accelerating voltage of 160 kV. Size distribution was obtained by measuring the diameter of each particle with ImageJ. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) was also performed to obtain the composition profile and the crystallinity size of the particles, using CuKα1,2 radiation (λ = 1:54056 Å and 1.54439 Å) in a Bragg-Brentano reflection configuration, on a PHILIPS X’ PERT PRO Panalytical diffractometer in a 2θ range of 15–90°, with a step size of 0.03. Composition of MNPs was analyzed by Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) using a FT-IR spectrometer Paragon 1000 from PerkinElmer (USA) using KBr disks.
Additionally, magnetic measurements were performed at room temperature using a PPMS-14T (Physical Property Measurement System).

2.3. Synthesis and Characterization of Polymeric MMPs

MMPs were synthesized following a polymer encapsulation procedure. First, a suspension of MNPs was added to a solution of PLGA and PVA 2% and sonicated during 1 min. Next, the obtained MMPs were left in a rotary evaporator to facilitate encapsulation and hardening and afterwards they were washed three times with water using an external magnetic disk, and then resuspended in water. PLGA-covered MMPs (PLGA@MMPs) were also functionalized with a layer of PEI for facilitating further bioconjugations. First, PLGA@MMPs were transferred to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf® and separated to the solution using a MagRack®. Then, an aqueous solution of PEI was added and stirred using a Vortex during 1 h. The MMPs@PEI were washed three-times with water and resuspended for further characterization. MMPs were characterized using a JEOL2000 EXII TEM, using a copper grid and an accelerating voltage of 160 kV, and by Dynamic Light Scattering using a Malvern Instruments Zetasizer Nano SZ with a solid-state He–Ne laser (wavelength λ = 633 nm).

3. Results

3.1. Sturctural Chracterization of MNPs

MNPs can be synthesized following different procedures, going from co-precipitation, which allows the production of nanoparticles in an easiest way, to thermal-decomposition. In our case, this second method has been followed, using iron (III) acethylacetonate as precursor in the presence of oleic acid and oleylamine as surfactants (Figure 1). In this process, controlling heating ramp is crucial in order to regulate the dimensions of the nanoparticles generated [13] and the polydispersity of the sample. In this case, temperature has been controlled indirectly, showing a linear increase until 220 °C when temperature stabilizes and magnetic nucleus formation takes place [14].
The exhaustive control of temperature allows the formation of MNPs with an average diameter size of 15 ± 5 nm according to TEM images (Figure 2), showing a reduced polydispersity of the sample, both in size and shape.
Diameter size has been compared with the estimated crystallinity size, in order to obtain the crystallinity grade of the sample. In this case, the estimation has been performed by X-Ray diffraction, using a Le Bail fitting method, revealing an apparent size of 12 ± 2 nm, which indicates that the nanoparticles are monocrystallines (Figure 3A). Moreover, the composition of MNPs has been studied using both X-Ray diffraction and IR spectroscopy. In the first case, characteristic diffraction peaks reveal that MNPs are composed of magnetite (Fe3O4) (Figure 3B), which is fundamental as magnetite easily oxidases into maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), leading to a reduction in the magnetization of the nanoparticles [15].
By IR (Figure 4), it has been also confirmed the presence of magnetite by the appearance of a band at 577 cm−1 due to magnetite solid-state vibrations. Additionally, the presence of bands at 2911 cm−1, w, and 2842 cm−1, w, indicate that MNPs are coated by oleates, as these bands correspond to the stretching of CH bonds. Bands at 1523 cm−1, w, br, and 1425 cm−1, m, br, correspond to the antisymmetric and symmetric stretching of carboxylate groups of the oleate and CH2 deformation.
Once known the characteristics of the as-synthesized MNPs, the analysis of their magnetic behavior was performed. For that purpose, hysteresis curve of MNPs at room temperature was measured (Figure 5), showing a superparamagnetic behavior with a coercive field of 12 Oe and a saturation magnetization of 70 emu/g, a value near the one for the bulk magnetite (90 emu/g) [16].
The above described results show that the MNPs synthesized in this work have ideal conditions both of polydispersity and magnetic behavior for its use as precursors for the formation of polymeric MMPs.

3.2. Sturctural Chracterization of MMPs

MMPs were synthesized by colloidal assembly of MNPs using a emulsion-based assembly method [11]. Briefly, a dispersion of MNPs in 2-propanol was mixed with PLGA solution and incorporated into a water phase of PVA. The contact of these two phases facilitates the assemble of polymeric MMPs. In this preliminary work, the as-synthesized MMPs were subsequently functionalized with PEI to facilitate its further functionalization with affinity proteins as NAV or antibodies that allow its use as immunosensing platforms. The obtained MMPs@PEI were characterized by measuring the magnetic behavior at room temperature. The hysteresis curve reveals that the Ms of the MMPs@PEI is lower than the obtained for the MNPs as the Ms is a parameter proportional to the weight of the sample and decreases among functionalization [17]. However, the assemble of MNPs into a cluster assures the formation of a higher magnetic moment (m) compared to the obtained for the MNPs.
MMPs have been characterized also in terms of size and shape of the particles generated. TEM measurements have been performed, showing that the as-synthesized MMPs have a size-distribution of 90 ± 18 nm, with a spherical shape and an appropriate polydispersity (Figure 6).
In order to determine if the functionalization has occurred appropriately, it has been recorded by dynamic light scattering the ζ-potential of MMPs after the functionalization with PLGA and PEI, detecting a notable change from the neutral surface charge of MMPs@PLGA (0.645 mV) to the positive surface charge of PEI-functionalized MMPs (15.6 mV) due to the presence of amine groups (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

Firstly, the use of a thermal-decomposition method has allowed to obtain MNPs with an appropriate size and polydispersity while maintaining an elevated Ms of 70 emu/g. Moreover, the structural characterization of the as-synthesized nanoparticles showed that they are mainly composed of magnetite with few presences of maghemite or other iron oxide forms, which explains the high Ms obtained.
Concerning the formation of PLGA@MMPs, in this work, MMPs of 90 ± 18 nm with favorable polydispersity and stability in aqueous media have been obtained. Additionally, these particles have been functionalized with PEI in order to facilitate its ulterior bioconjugation with affinity proteins as NAV or antibodies, which is essential for their use as immunosensing platforms. Magnetic behavior of MMPs@PEI shows a reduction in the Ms of the particle due to the increase of non-magnetic material.
All the above-mentioned information notes that MMPs synthesized in this work could be suitable for its use as immunosensing platforms, even though further research is required to investigate the bioconjugation of these MMPs with affinity molecules.

Author Contributions

C.T.-R., conceived, designed and performed the experiments, data analyses, writing—review and editing; F.J.G.-A., conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing; A.d.l.E.-M., supervision, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the FC-GRUPIN-ID/2018/000166 project from the Asturias Regional Government, the CTQ2017-86994-R project from the Spanish Ministry Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and supported by the IUTA/Gijón Council under the grant SV-20-GIJON-10. C. Toyos-Rodríguez thanks the MICINN (Spain) for the award of a FPI Grant (PRE2018-084853). A. de la Escosura-Muñiz acknowledges the MICINN (Spain) for the “Ramón y Cajal” Research Fellow (RyC-2016-20299).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reddy, L.H.; Arias, J.L.; Nicolas, J.; Couvreur, P. Magnetic Nanoparticles: Design and Characterization, Toxicity and Biocompatibility, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5818–5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tang, S.C.N.; Lo, I.M.C. Magnetic nanoparticles: Essential factors for sustainable environmental applications. Water Res. 2013, 47, 2613–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xu, Y.; Wang, E. Electrochemical biosensors based on magnetic micro/nano particles. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 84, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Y.-T.; Kolhatkar, A.G.; Zenasni, O.; Xu, S.; Lee, T.R. Biosensing Using Magnetic Particle Detection Techniques. Sensors 2017, 17, 2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Graham, D.L.; Ferreira, H.A.; Freitas, P.P. Magnetoresistive-based biosensors and biochips. Trends Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moghimi, S.M. Mechanisms of splenic clearance of blood cells and particles: Towards development of new splenotropic agents. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1995, 17, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nasir Baig, R.B.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Varma, R.S. Magnetically retrievable catalysts for asymmetric synthesis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 287, 137–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Netto, C.G.C.M.; Toma, H.E.; Andrade, L.H. Superparamagnetic nanoparticles as versatile carriers and supporting materials for enzymes. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2013, 85–86, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, Q.; Cao, D.; Li, S. The effect of the particle size and magnetic moment of the Fe 3 O 4 superparamagnetic beads on the sensitivity of biodetection. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 015215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bai, F.; Wang, D.; Huo, Z.; Chen, W.; Liu, L.; Liang, X.; Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y. A Versatile Bottom-up Assembly Approach to Colloidal Spheres from Nanocrystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6650–6653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bigall, N.C.; Wilhelm, C.; Beoutis, M.-L.; García-Hernandez, M.; Khan, A.A.; Giannini, C.; Sánchez-Ferrer, A.; Mezzenga, R.; Materia, M.E.; Garcia, M.A.; et al. Colloidal Ordered Assemblies in a Polymer Shell—A Novel Type of Magnetic Nanobeads for Theranostic Applications. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Toyos-Rodríguez, C.; Calleja-García, J.; Torres-Sánchez, L.; López, A.; Abu-Dief, A.M.; Costa, A.; Elbaile, L.; Crespo, R.D.; Garitaonandia, J.S.; Lastra, E.; et al. A Simple and Reliable Synthesis of Superparamagnetic Magnetite Nanoparticles by Thermal Decomposition of Fe(acac)3. J. Nanomater. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guardia, P.; Pérez-Juste, J.; Labarta, A.; Batlle, X.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Heating rate influence on the synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles: The case of decanoic acid. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kemp, S.J.; Ferguson, R.M.; Khandhar, A.P.; Krishnan, K.M. Monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles with nearly ideal saturation magnetization. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 77452–77464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Santoyo Salazar, J.; Perez, L.; de Abril, O.; Truong Phuoc, L.; Ihiawakrim, D.; Vazquez, M.; Greneche, J.-M.; Begin-Colin, S.; Pourroy, G. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in 10−40 nm Range: Composition in Terms of Magnetite/Maghemite Ratio and Effect on the Magnetic Properties. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tao, K.; Dou, H.; Sun, K. Interfacial coprecipitation to prepare magnetite nanoparticles: Concentration and temperature dependence. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2008, 320, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, W.; He, Q.; Jiang, C. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Surface Functionalization Strategies. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2008, 3, 397–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the synthetic procedure for the formation of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the synthetic procedure for the formation of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs).
Proceedings 60 00021 g001
Figure 2. (A) TEM images of as-synthesized MNPs and (B) size distribution histogram.
Figure 2. (A) TEM images of as-synthesized MNPs and (B) size distribution histogram.
Proceedings 60 00021 g002
Figure 3. (A) LeBail fitting (blue line) and experimental data (red line) of MNPs. (B) X-Ray diffraction pattern of MNPs (red line) showing the correlation with pure magnetite (blue line) used as reference.
Figure 3. (A) LeBail fitting (blue line) and experimental data (red line) of MNPs. (B) X-Ray diffraction pattern of MNPs (red line) showing the correlation with pure magnetite (blue line) used as reference.
Proceedings 60 00021 g003
Figure 4. Infrared spectrum of MNPs showing the corresponding peaks of magnetite (577 cm−1) and of the oleate surrounding the NPs (2910.9 cm−1, 2842.3 cm−1, 1523.4 cm−1 and 1425.3 cm−1).
Figure 4. Infrared spectrum of MNPs showing the corresponding peaks of magnetite (577 cm−1) and of the oleate surrounding the NPs (2910.9 cm−1, 2842.3 cm−1, 1523.4 cm−1 and 1425.3 cm−1).
Proceedings 60 00021 g004
Figure 5. Hysteresis curve of MNPs (red line) and PEI-functionalized MMPs (blue line).
Figure 5. Hysteresis curve of MNPs (red line) and PEI-functionalized MMPs (blue line).
Proceedings 60 00021 g005
Figure 6. (A) TEM micrographs of PEI-functionalized MMPs and (B) size distribution histogram of the previously mentioned particles.
Figure 6. (A) TEM micrographs of PEI-functionalized MMPs and (B) size distribution histogram of the previously mentioned particles.
Proceedings 60 00021 g006
Figure 7. ζ-potential of MMPs@PLGA (blue) and MMPs@PEI (red) showing the difference in the surface charge among functionalization.
Figure 7. ζ-potential of MMPs@PLGA (blue) and MMPs@PEI (red) showing the difference in the surface charge among functionalization.
Proceedings 60 00021 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Toyos-Rodríguez, C.; García-Alonso, F.J.; Escosura-Muñiz, A.d.l. Polymeric Magnetic Microparticles as Electrochemical Immunosensing Platforms. Proceedings 2020, 60, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07034

AMA Style

Toyos-Rodríguez C, García-Alonso FJ, Escosura-Muñiz Adl. Polymeric Magnetic Microparticles as Electrochemical Immunosensing Platforms. Proceedings. 2020; 60(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Toyos-Rodríguez, Celia, Francisco Javier García-Alonso, and Alfredo de la Escosura-Muñiz. 2020. "Polymeric Magnetic Microparticles as Electrochemical Immunosensing Platforms" Proceedings 60, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2020-07034

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop