1. Introduction
Smart e-textiles are a promising platform for body area wireless sensor networks. Antenna design on textiles has been an increasingly popular research area with fully-textile, hybrid and fully-rigid antennas designed for integration in garments [
1]. Flexible and textile antennas have been previously presented for body area networks [
2,
3], for energy harvesting at 2.4 GHz [
4], and at 5G millimetre-wave (mmWave) bands [
5]. Furthermore, substrate integrated waveguides (SIW) have been fabricated on textiles by using different conductive materials for improved isolation [
1].
Flexible on-body antenna design has been mostly focused on microstrip patch antennas and microstrip transmission lines [
3,
4], two areas which require geometrical limitations on the textile substrate, such as a large thickness, or bottlenecks the antenna’s radiation efficiency and bandwidth. For example, the radiation efficiency of a polyester-cotton patch antenna fabricated using inkjet printing has been capped at 56% [
3]. Furthermore, to achieve a radiation efficiency of 73% in [
4], the microstrip patch antenna had to be designed on a multi-layer felt substrate of more than 3 mm thickness utilising metalized conductive fabric for the antenna minimizing both the dielectric and conductor losses. At 5G mmWave bands (24–30 GHz), a radiation efficiency of 77.5% was reported in [
5] by using an antipodal Vivaldi monopole fabricated on a relatively thin woven-polyester substrate through the use of etched flexible copper laminates for the antenna’s conductive traces.
To overcome the efficiency barrier of textile antennas through an alternative design to the commonly used patch, this paper reviews the suitability of common e-textile fabrication techniques for radio-frequency (RF) networks and antennas. The experimental characterisation of a standard textile substrate up to 67 GHz is presented and the insertion losses in different textile transmission line structures are analysed. A coplanar wave guide (CPW) monopole antenna is designed based on the transmission line analysis and demonstrates a higher radiation efficiency than state-of-art textile microstrip antennas.
2. Characterising and Analysing Textile Transmission Lines
The losses in a RF transmission line, and hence in an antenna, are categorized into conductor and dielectric losses. The conductor losses are a main function of the conductor’s skin depth and surface roughness [
6], and the dielectric losses are usually a function of the antenna’s geometry [
5].
Multiple e-textile fabrication techniques are based on additive manufacturing: Conductive ink is deposited on a printed interface layer which reduces the roughness of the textile to around 10 µm [
2]. While this technique is suitable for Direct Current (DC) and low frequency applications, when the skin depth effect is combined with the 10 µm surface roughness in [
3], the conductive losses result in a reduced radiation efficiency. Moreover, the commercially available interface layers characterized in [
4] suffer from a high dissipation factor (tanδ), which increases the dielectric losses of the line or the antenna.
An alternative fabrication technique is the utilisation of thin copper laminates [
3,
5] or metallised conductive textiles [
4]. By using polyimide copper laminates or metallised fabrics, the surface roughness effect will be minimised to commercial printed circuit board-levels, thus reducing the conductor losses compared to thin-films techniques. Moreover, this eliminates the need for printed interface layers of high dissipation factors,an interface which reduces the radiation efficiency of planar antennae.
To accurately model the properties of textile lines, the fabric substrate was experimentally characterized by using the two-line dielectric characterisation technique [
7]. The two-port scattering matrices of two microstrip lines of different lengths were measured using a vector network analyser (VNA) to extract the dielectric properties of the textile [
7]. The extracted dielectric properties of the woven-polyester with polyimide interface layer were ε
r = 1.67 and tanδ = 0.028.
Figure 1 shows the measured scattering-parameters results as well as the measurement technique
Based on the extracted parameters of the textile substrate, a microstrip and a CPW were built in 3D full-wave electromagnetic simulation in CST Microwave Studio, a finite integration technique (FIT) package. The simulated transmission lines were designed based on a 200 µm woven-polyester substrate, with a 100 µm printed waterproof interface layer (ε
r = 1.67 and tanδ = 0.028 [
4]) as in [
2,
4]. Both lines were designed to have a 50 Ω characteristic impedance and a length of 20 mm.
Figure 2 shows the electric field distribution of the textile CPW and microstrip lines.
Due to the electric field distribution in
Figure 2, the insertion losses on a lossy dielectric were expected to be higher for a microstrip line due to the higher electric-field dissipation in the substrate.
Figure 3 shows the forward transmission of the 20 mm lines, up to 50 GHz, of the 10 µm conductor surface-roughness, with more than 37% higher losses in the microstrip line compared to the CPW. Moreover, the CPW line could be used up to 10 GHz higher than a microstrip line of similar losses, thus demonstrating its suitability for mmWave textile antennas and filters for future 5G networks.
3. The Coplanar-Wave Guide Monopole Antenna
As a CPW line was demonstrated to reduce insertion losses, a quarter-wave monopole antenna fed using a 50 Ohm CPW was designed and simulated for a textile substrate for the 2.4 GHz Industrial, Scientific Medical (ISM)-band. The antenna was fabricated using polyimide copper laminates, which were plotter-cut to create the trace pattern, and adhered to a thin (<0.3 mm) polyester-cotton substrate using 3M spray-mount adhesive.
Figure 4 shows the antenna’s layout and electric field distribution, as well as the antenna’s photograph on-body.
The return loss of the antenna was measured using a VNA with a soldered SMA connector (
Figure 4c) to validate the simulated results.
Figure 5 shows the simulated and measured return loss, which showed a close agreement around 2.4 GHz, as well as the computed 3D gain radiation pattern.
As predicted based on the transmission line analysis, the antenna a demonstrated low radiation resistance (conductor and dielectric losses) resulting in a higher radiation efficiency compared to patch antennas due to the lower losses of a CPW monopole antenna.
Table 1 shows the simulated and measured antenna parameters as well as a comparison with printed and metalized-fabric patch antennas on thick felt fabrics. The proposed antenna’s gain was lower than the reported antennas in [
2] and [
4] due to the omnidirectional radiation pattern of the proposed antenna. A 50% higher radiation efficiency could translate to a lower transmission power while maintaining the same range for a textile transmitter or to 50% more received power in case of a wireless power receiver.