You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Proceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

5 September 2019

Energy Scale of the Charge Density Wave in Cuprate Superconductors †

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Laboratoire Matériaux et Phénomènes Quantiques (UMR 7162 CNRS), Université de Paris, Bat. Condorcet, 75205 Paris CEDEX 13, France
2
Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay CEDEX, France
3
Laboratoire National des Champs Magnéetiques Intenses, CNRS-Université Grenoble Alpes-Université Paul Sabatier-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, European Magnetic Field Laboratory, 38042 Grenoble, France
4
Service de Physique de l''Etat Condensé, DSM/IRAMIS/SPEC (UMR 3680 CNRS), CEA Saclay 91191 Gif sur Yvette CEDEX, France
This article belongs to the Proceedings The 37th International Symposium on Dynamical Properties of Solids
The cuprate high temperature superconductors develop spontaneous charge density wave (CDW) order below a temperature TCDW and over a wide range of hole doping (p). An outstanding challenge in the field is to understand whether this modulated phase is related to the more exhaustively studied pseudogap and superconducting phases [1]. To address this issue, it is important to extract the energy scale ΔCDW associated with the CDW order, and to compare it with the pseudogap (PG) ΔPG and with the superconducting gap ΔSC. However, while TCDW is well-characterized from earlier work, little is known about ΔCDW until now. Here, we report the extraction of ΔCDW for several cuprates using electronic Raman spectroscopy [2]. Crucially, we find that upon approaching the parent Mott state by lowering p, ΔCDW increases in a manner similar to the doping dependence of ΔPG and ΔSC [2]. This indicates that the above three phases have a common microscopic origin [2]. In addition, we find that ΔCDW and ΔSC have the same magnitude over a substantial doping range, which suggests that CDW and superconducting phases are intimately related [2], as reported for example by fractionalized pair density wave [3].

References

  1. Keimer, B.; Kivelson, S.A.; Norman, M.R.; Zaanen, S.U.J. From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxide. Nature 2015, 518, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Loret, B.; Auvray, N.; Gallais, Y.; Cazayous, M.; Forget, A.; Colson, D.; Julien, M.-H.; Paul, I.; Civelli, M.; Sacuto, A. Intimate link between charge density wave, pseudogap and superconducting energy scales in cuprates. Nature Phys. 2019, 15, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chakraborty, D.; Grandadam, M.; Hamidian, M.H.; Davis, J.C.S.; Sidis, Y.; Pépin, C. Fractionalized pair density wave in the pseudo-gap phase of cuprate superconductors. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1906.01633. [Google Scholar]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.