Next Article in Journal
An Empirical Model of Aerodynamic Drag in Alpine Skiing
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of the Grip Angle on Off-Spin Bowling Performance Parameters, Analysed with a Smart Cricket Ball
Open AccessProceedings

CFD for Surfboards: Comparison between Three Different Designs in Static and Maneuvering Conditions

by 1,2,* and 2
1
NTNU—Norwegian University of Science and Technology—SIAT (Senter for Idrettsanlegg og Teknologi), K. Hejes vei 2b, 7042 Trondheim, Norway
2
Intitutt for Energiteknikk, Instituttveien 18a, 2007 Kjeller, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 12th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 26–29 March 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(6), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060309
Published: 14 February 2018
The present paper aims to show the potential of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solvers for surfboard design and its applicability by comparing three different surfboards with minimal changes in design. In fact, surfboard manufacturing routines are moving towards more controlled and reproducible manufacturing processes, in particular Computer numerically controlled (CNC) shaping techniques. As a consequence, three dimensional (3D) computer models of the boards start to be available, and can be imported in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) programs. This opens up a new design methodology, where the performances of the different shapes can be studied and quantitatively evaluated, highlighting details that would be otherwise impossible to identify from a field test. The commercial CFD code STAR-CCM+ is used in the present work to compare the performance of three different surfboards, with different curvature at the bottom and different tail shapes. In the simulations, an Unsteady Reynolds Navier Stokes (URANS) approach is used, with the volume of fluid (VOF) method as free surface discretization method and the k-omega-SST turbulence model as numerical closure of the RANS equations. CFD proved to be a valid tool to compare the performances of the different shapes, bringing into light subtle but important differences between the designs. In particular, the static simulations showed that the rocker affects the performances by increasing the lift but also the drag of the board, also generating higher forces in maneuvering conditions. On the other hand, the tail shape did not affect the performances of the board in the analyzed cases.
Keywords: CFD; surfboard design; hydrodynamics CFD; surfboard design; hydrodynamics
MDPI and ACS Style

Oggiano, L.; Pierella, F. CFD for Surfboards: Comparison between Three Different Designs in Static and Maneuvering Conditions. Proceedings 2018, 2, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060309

AMA Style

Oggiano L, Pierella F. CFD for Surfboards: Comparison between Three Different Designs in Static and Maneuvering Conditions. Proceedings. 2018; 2(6):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oggiano, Luca; Pierella, Fabio. 2018. "CFD for Surfboards: Comparison between Three Different Designs in Static and Maneuvering Conditions" Proceedings 2, no. 6: 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060309

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop