Next Article in Journal
Measurement of Interaction between Futsal Footwear and Futsal Pitch Surface under Different Outsole Condition
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Ball Wear on Ball Aerodynamics: An Investigation Using Hawk-Eye Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Simulation of Mechanical Characteristics of Tennis Racket String Bed Considering String Pattern †

1
Engineering, Information, and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan
2
Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan
3
Global Equipment Product Department, MIZUNO Corp., Osaka 559-5810, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 12th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 26–29 March 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(6), 264; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060264
Published: 11 February 2018

Abstract

:
The effect of string pattern on the mechanical characteristics of a tennis racket were simulated numerically. A numerical simulation program to evaluate deformation of the string bed of a tennis racket was developed using the finite element method. The formulation of a numerical simulation code is described in this paper. The applicability of the developed simulation program was investigated by comparing experimental results of loading tests on string bed specimens, for which the distance between strings was 12 mm. The out-of-plane stiffness and sliding characteristics of strings of an actual racket were simulated using the developed simulation code.

1. Introduction

The performance and feeling of tennis rackets are realized by the combination of the racket’s frame and string bed. Tennis players select their own individual tennis racket frame and strings depending on their play style and playabilities, individually. Currently, natural guts, nylon, polyester-strings and hybrid strings are available for tennis racket. Diameters of the strings have ranged from 1.2 mm to 1.35 mm since the 19th century. With the exception of missed shots, mechanical contributions are applied to the tennis ball by the string bed of a tennis racket. The stiffness of the string bed in the out-of-plane direction affects the speed of the impacted ball. The sliding characteristics of strings in-plane affect to the spin of the ball. So, the number of cross and main strings and the length and interval of each string are important engineering issues when designing a tennis rackets.
The effect of string bed properties on ball spin was investigated in recent researches [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Allen et al. (2010) showed that reducing ball/string friction can increase rebound spin by a computational model [1]. Haake et al. (2012) showed that rebound spin was dependent on inter-string friction experimentally [5]. Nicolaides et al. (2013) investigated the effect of string bed pattern on ball spin [6]. In these researches, they found that rebound spin decreased with the number of cross strings. Washida et al. (2014) showed measured data about relationships between number of cross strings and rebound spin [7].
In this paper, an original numerical simulation program of finite element method for string bed in tennis rackets are described. The simulation program was coded by the Fortran Language in UNIX system. For numerical modeling, simple beam elements which represent tensile load were applied to the modeling of orthogonal main and cross strings. Nominal force at each intersection of strings was calculated and the Coulomb friction model was applied with an elastic-plastic constitutive model to represent the in-plane slide of strings. The validity of the developed code is investigated through comparison with the experimental results of string beds in rectangular aluminum jigs. Simulated results of a tennis racket are shown to represent the applicability of the developed code.

2. Materials and Methods

The 3-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system was applied to string beds in this study. The positional relationship of the coordinates is shown in Figure 1. In preparation for the computational simulation, nodes for finite element analysis were prepared at all intersections of the main and cross strings. Also, additional nodes were prepared at grommets and their displacement was constrained. Beam elements (In Figure 2) are applied between nodes to represent the tennis strings. Tension of cross and main strings T x and and T y were assumed to be constant in this study. Forces at ith and jth nodes in z-direction are given by following equations:
f z ( i ) = α T L ¯ ( i , j ) ( u z ( i ) u z ( j ) ) ,   f z ( j ) = α T L ¯ ( i , j ) ( u z ( j ) u z ( i ) )
Here, i and j indicate respective node numbers. u z ( i ) is displacement in the z direction of the ith node. T in Equation (1) corresponds to T x for horizontal strings and T y for vertical strings. L ¯ ( i , j ) is the length between ith and jth nodes, which was updated at every step of the simulation. Length of strings L ¯ ( i , j ) was calculated with L ¯ ( i , j ) = L ( i , j ) u x ( i ) + u x ( j ) for cross strings and L ¯ ( i , j ) = L ( i , j ) u y ( i ) + u y ( j ) for main strings. α is the adjusting coefficient of out-of-plane stiffness. The coefficient α is provided because there are strings that contribute to the out-of-plane stiffness and strings that do not. In Figure 2, it can be seen that strings at the intersecting points of the main and cross strings were located above or below the other strings. It is suggested that the strings at the jth node did not make a strong contribution to out-of-plane stiffness because they were compressed when vertical downward force was applied to the jth node. Conversely, strings at the ith node made a strong contribution to out-of-plane stiffness because they stretched when vertical downward force was applied to the ith node.
For the elements of cross strings, force at the ith and jth nodes in the x-direction (orthogonal to the string) were formulated with the following equations:
f x ( i ) = f N ( i ) ( u x ( i ) ) f N ( j ) ( u x ( j ) ) ,   f x ( j ) = f N ( j ) ( u x ( j ) ) f N ( i ) ( u x ( i ) )
The positional relationship of nodes, forces and displacement are shown in Figure 3. u x ( i ) is displacement in the x-direction of the ith node. f N ( i ) is frictional force at the ith node, which equilibrates with external force under the maximum frictional force. f N ( i ) is defined as a function of the horizontal displacement of the ith intersection of strings.
Force at the ith and jth nodes in y-direction are formulated with the following equations considering the angular change of a string with constant tension T x .
f y ( i ) = T x L ¯ ( i , j ) ( u y ( i ) u y ( j ) ) ,   f y ( j ) = T x L ¯ ( i , j ) ( u y ( j ) u y ( i ) )
Here, u y ( i ) is the displacement in the y-direction of the ith node. When seeking f x ( i ) , f y ( i ) and f z ( i ) of main strings, Equation (1) can be applied for f z ( i ) of main strings. For in-plane stiffness, Equations (2) and (3) can be applied for f x ( i ) and f y ( i ) of main strings by exchanging the subscripts x and y representing direction. Here, f N m a x ( i ) is the maximum frictional force of the ith node. f N m a x ( i ) was calculated as
f N m a x ( i ) = μ f N ( i )
where μ is the frictional coefficient and f N ( i ) is normal force at the ith node. f N ( i ) was calculated from the initial configuration of the string bed as follows:
f N ( i ) = D 2 ( T x L ( i , k ) + T x L ( i , l ) ) + D 2 ( T y L ( i , m ) + T y L ( i , n ) )
Here, D is the diameter of the strings. String intersections did not slide easily when diameter D was large. Positional relationships of the nodes in Equation (5) are shown in Figure 4. In this study, maximum frictional force f N m a x ( i ) was calculated at all nodes of intersecting strings and assumed to be constant. For the simulation algorithm, an incremental calculation method was applied. Equations (1)–(3) were rewritten as incremental, as follows:
Δ f z ( i ) = K z ( i ) Δ u z ( i ) K z ( j ) Δ u z ( j ) ,   Δ f z ( j ) = K z ( j ) Δ u z ( j ) K z ( i ) Δ u z ( i )
Δ f y ( i ) = K y ( i ) Δ u y ( i ) K y ( j ) Δ u y ( j ) ,   Δ f y ( j ) = K y ( j ) Δ u y ( j ) K y ( i ) Δ u y ( i )
Δ f x ( i ) = K x ( i ) Δ u x ( i ) K x ( j ) Δ u x ( j ) ,   Δ f x ( j ) = K x ( j ) Δ u x ( j ) K x ( i ) Δ u x ( i )
For cross strings, K z ( i ) and K z ( j ) are equal to α T x / L ¯ ( i , j ) . K y ( i ) and K y ( j ) are equal to T x / L ¯ ( i , j ) . K x ( i ) was defined as follows:
K x ( i ) = f N m a x ( i ) 0.2   i f   ( u x ( i ) 0.2 ) ,   K x ( i ) = f N m a x ( i ) 100   i f   ( u x ( i ) > 0.2 )
In this study, elastic-plastic relation shown in Figure 5 was applied for modeling of friction.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of String Pattern on Mechanical Characteristics of String Bed

To investigate the effect of string pattern on the mechanical characteristics of the string bed of a tennis racket, square string-bed specimens were prepared for which the interval of both vertical and horizontal strings was 12 mm. The string-bed specimen shown in Figure 6 was made with an aluminum outer frame with 16 string holes in each side. Loading tests of string-bed specimens to evaluate out-of-plane stiffness were conducted to investigate the effect of loading position and string tension on the out-of-plane stiffness of the string bed. Displacement distribution for numerical simulations is shown in Figure 7. Results of numerical simulation and loading tests are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. The effects of loading position and string tension on out-of-plane stiffness of a string-bed specimen were predicted well with numerical simulation. In this simulation, the coefficient α was assumed to be 0.6.

3.2. Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Characteristics of Tennis Racket String Bed

Numerical simulations were conducted for a tennis racket (shown in Figure 10) to evaluate the out-of-plane stiffness and the in-plane slip effect of intersections. The out-of-plane stiffness of the tennis racket string bed and the sliding intersections of main and cross strings were calculated using the proposed method. Tennis ball load was assumed to be diagonal at 30 degrees in the x-z plane at the center, bottom and top points of the string bed, respectively. The geometric shape was measured on the actual racket. The frictional coefficient μ between the main and the cross strings was assumed to be 0.2. In Figure 11, the calculated distributions of the displacements of the tennis racket string bed are shown. Depending on the vertical position of the racket, there were no large differences in the distribution of the deformation in the out-of-plane direction. In Figure 12, displacement of the intersections in the in-plane direction are shown. The load at the red intersections was greater than the maximum frictional force f N m a x ( i ) , and this indicates that the intersections slid. In Figure 13, the relationships between displacement and force in the out-of-plane direction are shown. The out-of-plane stiffness of the simulated racket was not affected by the vertical position of the string bed. The effect of string diameter on sliding when loading to the center point is shown in Figure 14. Because strings with small diameters can easily slide laterally, it is expected that spin performance of actual rackets will be enhanced with the use of thin strings.

4. Conclusions

In order to construct a design method using a numerical analysis of racket performance, we modeled the tennis racket string bed using a finite element method. String-bed specimens were prepared, and the applicability of our proposed method was confirmed by comparing the numerical simulations with experimental data. It was possible to predict the distribution of the out-of-plane stiffness and slip performance of the actual racket strings using this simulation method.

References

  1. Allen, T.; Haake, S.; Goodwill, S. Effect of friction on tennis ball impacts. J. Sports Eng. Technol. 2010, 224, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Choppin, S.; Goodwill, S.; Haake, S. Impact characteristics of the ball and racket during play at the Wimbledon qualifying tournament. Sports Eng. 2011, 13, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cross, R. Effects of friction between the ball and strings in tennis. Sports Eng. 2000, 3, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Haake, S.; Allen, T.; Choppin, S.; Goodwill, S. The evolution of the tennis racket and its effect on serve speed. In Tennis Science and Technology 3; International Tennis Federation: London, UK, 2007; pp. 257–271. [Google Scholar]
  5. Haake, S.; Allen, T.; Jones, A.; Spurr, J.; Goodwill, S. Effect of inter-string friction on tennis ball rebound. J. Eng. Tribol. 2012, 226, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nicolaides, A.; Elliott, N.; Kelly, J.; Pinaffo, M.; Allen, T. Effect of string bed pattern on ball spin generation from a tennis racket. J. Spots Eng. 2013, 16, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Washida, Y.; Elliott, N.; Allen, T. Measurement of main strings movement and its effect on tennis ball spin. Procedia Eng. 2014, 72, 72–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Coordination system for this research.
Figure 1. Coordination system for this research.
Proceedings 02 00264 g001
Figure 2. Deformation of string element in out-of-plane direction of string bed.
Figure 2. Deformation of string element in out-of-plane direction of string bed.
Proceedings 02 00264 g002
Figure 3. Deformation of string element with plane direction of string bed (Elements for main string).
Figure 3. Deformation of string element with plane direction of string bed (Elements for main string).
Proceedings 02 00264 g003
Figure 4. Positional relationships of nodes to calculate normal forces at cross-points of strings.
Figure 4. Positional relationships of nodes to calculate normal forces at cross-points of strings.
Proceedings 02 00264 g004
Figure 5. Relationship between friction force and displacement for intersections of main and cross strings.
Figure 5. Relationship between friction force and displacement for intersections of main and cross strings.
Proceedings 02 00264 g005
Figure 6. String-bed specimen; string interval is 12 mm.
Figure 6. String-bed specimen; string interval is 12 mm.
Proceedings 02 00264 g006
Figure 7. Simulated results of deformation of string bed at point A (force = 100 N).
Figure 7. Simulated results of deformation of string bed at point A (force = 100 N).
Proceedings 02 00264 g007
Figure 8. Relationships between displacement and force in out-of-plane direction.
Figure 8. Relationships between displacement and force in out-of-plane direction.
Proceedings 02 00264 g008
Figure 9. Effect of string tension on stiffness in out-of-plane direction.
Figure 9. Effect of string tension on stiffness in out-of-plane direction.
Proceedings 02 00264 g009
Figure 10. Tennis racket for simulation.
Figure 10. Tennis racket for simulation.
Proceedings 02 00264 g010
Figure 11. Simulated results of deformation of string bed in tennis racket (force=100 N, display 10 times displacement in out-of-plane direction).
Figure 11. Simulated results of deformation of string bed in tennis racket (force=100 N, display 10 times displacement in out-of-plane direction).
Proceedings 02 00264 g011
Figure 12. Simulated results of sliding intersections of tennis racket (intersections that slid ware shown as red circles, non-sliding intersections are shown as blue circles).
Figure 12. Simulated results of sliding intersections of tennis racket (intersections that slid ware shown as red circles, non-sliding intersections are shown as blue circles).
Proceedings 02 00264 g012
Figure 13. Effect of loading position on out-of-plane stiffness.
Figure 13. Effect of loading position on out-of-plane stiffness.
Proceedings 02 00264 g013
Figure 14. Effect of string diameter on sliding of intersections.
Figure 14. Effect of string diameter on sliding of intersections.
Proceedings 02 00264 g014
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matsuda, A.; Nakui, M.; Hashiguchi, T. Simulation of Mechanical Characteristics of Tennis Racket String Bed Considering String Pattern. Proceedings 2018, 2, 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060264

AMA Style

Matsuda A, Nakui M, Hashiguchi T. Simulation of Mechanical Characteristics of Tennis Racket String Bed Considering String Pattern. Proceedings. 2018; 2(6):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matsuda, Akihiro, Motoho Nakui, and Tomohiro Hashiguchi. 2018. "Simulation of Mechanical Characteristics of Tennis Racket String Bed Considering String Pattern" Proceedings 2, no. 6: 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060264

APA Style

Matsuda, A., Nakui, M., & Hashiguchi, T. (2018). Simulation of Mechanical Characteristics of Tennis Racket String Bed Considering String Pattern. Proceedings, 2(6), 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060264

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop