Next Article in Journal
Robust Trajectory Optimization of a Ski Jumper for Uncertainty Influence and Safety Quantification
Previous Article in Journal
A Thermal Test System for Helmet Cooling Studies
Proceeding Paper

Controlling Density and Modulus in Auxetic Foam Fabrications—Implications for Impact and Indentation Testing

1
Materials Engineering Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
2
Sports Engineering Research Team, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
3
Centre for Sports Engineering Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
4
Metamaterials Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 12th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 26–29 March 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(6), 250; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060250
Published: 13 February 2018
Foams are commonly used for cushioning in protective sporting equipment. Volumetrically compressing open-cell polyurethane foam buckles cell ribs creating a re-entrant structure—set by heating then cooling—which can impart auxetic behaviour. Theoretically, auxetic materials improve impact protection by increasing indentation resistance and energy absorption, potentially reducing sporting injuries and burdens on individuals, health services and national economies. In previous work, auxetic foam exhibited ~3 to ~8 times lower peak force (compared to its conventional counterpart) under impacts adopted from tests used to certify protective sporting equipment. Increases to the foam’s density and changes to stress/strain relationships (from fabrication) mean Poisson’s ratio’s contribution to reduced peak forces under impact is unclear. This work presents a simple fabrication method for foam samples with comparable density and linear stress/strain relationship, but different Poisson’s ratios ranging between 0.1 and −0.3, an important step in assessing the Poisson’s ratio’s contribution to impact force attenuation.
Keywords: Auxetic; Foam; Fabrication; safety; impact; protection Auxetic; Foam; Fabrication; safety; impact; protection
MDPI and ACS Style

Duncan, O.; Allen, T.; Foster, L.; Gatt, R.; Grima, J.N.; Alderson, A. Controlling Density and Modulus in Auxetic Foam Fabrications—Implications for Impact and Indentation Testing. Proceedings 2018, 2, 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060250

AMA Style

Duncan O, Allen T, Foster L, Gatt R, Grima JN, Alderson A. Controlling Density and Modulus in Auxetic Foam Fabrications—Implications for Impact and Indentation Testing. Proceedings. 2018; 2(6):250. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060250

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duncan, Olly, Tom Allen, Leon Foster, Ruben Gatt, Joseph N. Grima, and Andrew Alderson. 2018. "Controlling Density and Modulus in Auxetic Foam Fabrications—Implications for Impact and Indentation Testing" Proceedings 2, no. 6: 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060250

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop