Next Article in Journal
Discrimination of Quality and Geographical Origin of Extra Virgin Olive Oil by S3 Device with Metal Oxides Gas Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Optimization of a Low-Resonant-Frequency Piezoelectric MEMS Energy Harvester Based on Artificial Intelligence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Influence of Buffer Thickness on Sensitivity of Pd-Coated Side Polished Single Mode Optical Fiber Hydrogen Sensor †

by
Mukesh P. Singh
1,* and
Santosh Chaurasia
2
1
Department of Applied Science & Humanities, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India
2
Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Academy of Business & Engineering Sciences, Ghaziabad 201009, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Eurosensors 2018 Conference, Graz, Austria, 9–12 September 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(13), 1078; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131078
Published: 26 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of EUROSENSORS 2018)

Abstract

:
Optical fiber sensor which is based on palladium is highly sensitive to detect hydrogen. In this paper we analyzed the effect of buffer on sensitivity. Sensitivity is affected due to presence of buffer between side polished fiber core and hydrogen absorbing palladium layer. We optimized the buffer thicknesses for different palladium thickness to achieve maximum sensitivity.

1. Introduction

Consumption of traditional energy sources, i.e., hydrocarbons produces toxic gases which pollute the environment and have adverse effect on our health. The consumption of hydrogen as fuel do not produce any toxic material and hence it is being promised as one of the cleanest energy source [1]. Since gaseous volumetric hydrogen concentration in the range 4–74.5% in air (at room temperature and pressure) leads to an explosive atmosphere, highly sensitive sensors are required to monitor the presence of hydrogen in the environment [2]. Different types of semiconductor-based hydrogen sensors have been demonstrated [3]. These sensors exploit electrical characteristics for the detection purpose and hence may trigger an explosion during hydrogen leakage. In order to avoid this, optical fiber based sensors are preferred in hydrogenation environment because in this only optical signal is playing the role of sensing while its electrical parts, source and detector are located remotely, and also have a number of other advantages such as inherent safety, immunity to electromagnetic interference, and distributed remote sensing capability [4]. Different types of optical fiber hydrogen sensors are reported in literature and most of them are based on the interaction of the evanescent field with hydrogen through a transducer [5,6,7]. Recently Kim et al. have proposed a hydrogen sensor based on Pd coated side polished single mode fiber (SPSMF) [8]. In this design a single mode fiber is fixed in a quartz block and side polished to remove cladding to expose the evanescent tail of the field guided in the core of fiber. The polished face of the fiber is then coated with Pd which acts as a transducer.

2. Numerical Procedure

A schematic of SPSMF is shown in Figure 1 in which remaining cladding present between core and Pd layer is shown as buffer layer.
The equivalent planar model of this sensor is divided in three sections, namely input, sensor and output sections as shown in Figure 2. The input and output sections represent equivalent planar waveguide (EPWG) of the input and output of the single mode fibers and the polished side polished fiber half block (SMFHB) with buffer layer and Pd layer represented as sensor section. The modal indices and the field distribution of guided modes in all these sections were obtained using numerical procedure reported earlier [9]. At z = 0, the excitation coefficients of the guided mode and surface plasmon wave (SPW) of sensing section and that of the guided mode of output section at z = L as well as the power coupled to the sensing and output sections were obtained using the numerical procedure as suggested in Ref. [10]. The dielectric constant of Pd film changes during hydrogenation and hence the field distribution of SPW which leads to corresponding change in excitation coefficient and hence the power coupling to sensing and output sections. Since the optical power absorption decreases as the concentration of H2 in Pd increases, this change results in an increase in the optical power coupled into output section. The power coupling between the guided mode and SPW depends strongly on the thickness of the buffer layer, hence the thickness of remaining cladding, i.e., of the buffer layer is optimized to obtain maximized sensitivity of the sensor. The sensitivity of SMFHB sensor is defined as S = 10log10(Pg/Pa) where Pa and Pg are the output optical powers when the sensor section is exposed to pure N2 and mixture of N2 (96%) and H2 (4%) respectively. Since the SPW modes at dielectric/metal interface are supported only for TM modes, we have not considered TE modes in our calculations. The effect of radiation and reflected power at the input/sensor and sensor/output junctions are also neglected. All numerical simulations have been performed at wavelength 1550 nm.

3. Result and Discussion

When the palladium film absorbed the hydrogen, then complex dielectric constant of palladium film changes. The real and imaginary part of the dielectric constant increases almost linearly with increase in hydrogen concentration. When palladium becomes palladium hydride, its complex dielectric constant formulated by εpd(c) = h(c)εpd(0), where the hydrogen constant h(c) is the empirical decreasing function of the hydrogen concentration, c is the concentration of hydrogen in pd and εpd(0) is the complex dielectric constant of Pd in the absence of hydrogen [11].
Sensitivity as a function of buffer thickness for different transducer (Pd) thickness is shown in Figure 3.
The sensitivity shows a maxima for a given Pd thickness at certain buffer thickness. Figure 4 shows the variation of optimized buffer thickness and sensitivity as a function of palladium thickness. With the increase in Pd thickness the optimized buffer thickness increases initially showing a maximum value of 1.1 µm for Pd thickness 56 nm and then gradually decreases and after that almost constant. Maximum sensitivity is obtained for Pd thickness 26 nm for optimized buffer thickness 0.62 µm. The sensitivity (S) of the sensor has been plotted as function of length of the sensor section in Figure 5 which exhibits that the sensitivity increases linearly with the increase in interaction length. With use of optimized buffer thickness an improvement of nearly 84% is found for the interaction length of 2.46 mm used in the experimental results reported in Ref. [8] in which the buffer thickness was 2 µm. Effect of hydrogen concentration in ppm (parts per million) on sensitivity for reported and optimized buffer and optimized transducer thickness is shown in Figure 6. Results show that sensitivity varies linearly with hydrogen concentration in transducer layer when the sensor is subjected to mixture of N2 (96%) and (H2 4%) at partial pressure of about 630 torr at room temperature [12].

4. Conclusions

We have done the numerical investigation of single mode side polished fiber hydrogen sensor. The remaining thickness of cladding layer between the core and Pd acts as a buffer layer which controls the coupling between guided and plasmon modes. We studied this coupling effect and optimized thickness of this buffer layer to maximize the guided to plasmon mode coupling. We achieved an improvement of 84% in sensitivity with respect to the reported experimental results.

References

  1. Töpler, J. Hydrogen as energy-storage-medium and fuel—A strong partner of renewable energies. Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain. 2016, 1, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hübert, T.; Boon-Brett, L.; Black, G.; Banach, U. Hydrogen sensors—A review. Sens. Actuators B 2011, 157, 329–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Christofides, C.; Mandelis, A. Solid-state sensor for trace hydrogen gas detection. J. Appl. Phys. 1990, 68, R1–R30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Orellana, G.; Haigh, D. New trends in fiber-optic chemical and biological sensors. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2008, 4, 273–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tabib-Azar, M.; Sutapun, B.; Petrick, R.; Kazemi, A. Highly sensitive hydrogen sensors using palladium coated fiber optics with exposed cores and evanescent field interactions. Sens. Actuators B 1999, 56, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Villatoro, J.; Díez, A.; Cruz, J.L.; Andrés, M.V. Highly sensitive optical hydrogen sensor using circular Pd-coated single-mode tapered fiber. Electron. Lett. 2001, 37, 1011–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zalvidea, D.; Díez, A.; Cruz, J.L.; Andrés, M.V. Hydrogen sensor based on a palladium-coated fibre-taper with improved time response. Sens. Actuators B 2006, 114, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, K.T.; Song, H.S.; Mah, J.P.; Hong, K.B.; Im, K.; Baik, S.; Yoon, Y.I. Hydrogen sensor based on palladium coated side-polished single-mode fiber. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 1767–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sharma, E.K.; Singh, M.P. Multilayer waveguide devices with absorbing layers. J. Opt. Commun. 1993, 14, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, M.P.; Sharma, A. Wavelength selectivity of in-line fiber optic filter devices. Appl. Opt. 1998, 37, 6350–6354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bevenot, X.; Trouillet, A.; Veillas, C.; Gagnaire, H.; Clement, M. Hydrogen leak detection using an optical fiber sensor for aerospace applications. Sens. Actuators B 2000, 67, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Butler, M.A. Micromirror optical-fiber hydrogen sensor. Sens. Actuators B 1994, 22, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of Pd coated side polished fiber half block (SMFHB) with remaining cladding (buffer) layer.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of Pd coated side polished fiber half block (SMFHB) with remaining cladding (buffer) layer.
Proceedings 02 01078 g001
Figure 2. The equivalent planar waveguide model of side polished fiber with design parameters as used in Ref. [8].
Figure 2. The equivalent planar waveguide model of side polished fiber with design parameters as used in Ref. [8].
Proceedings 02 01078 g002
Figure 3. The sensitivity (S) of the SMFHB sensor as function of buffer thickness (b) for different palladium (Pd) thickness.
Figure 3. The sensitivity (S) of the SMFHB sensor as function of buffer thickness (b) for different palladium (Pd) thickness.
Proceedings 02 01078 g003
Figure 4. The optimized buffer thickness (– - –) and sensitivity (—) plotted as function of palladium layer thickness (t).
Figure 4. The optimized buffer thickness (– - –) and sensitivity (—) plotted as function of palladium layer thickness (t).
Proceedings 02 01078 g004
Figure 5. Sensitivity versus interaction length (µm) of sensor with (dashed line) and without (solid line) optimized buffer thicknesses with Pd layer thickness of 20 nm.
Figure 5. Sensitivity versus interaction length (µm) of sensor with (dashed line) and without (solid line) optimized buffer thicknesses with Pd layer thickness of 20 nm.
Proceedings 02 01078 g005
Figure 6. Sensitivity versus hydrogen concentration (ppm) in sensing layer for reported buffer thickness b = 2 µm (---) optimized buffer thicknesses b = 0.62 µm (-) with Pd layer thickness of 20 nm and optimized Pd layer thickness 26 nm.
Figure 6. Sensitivity versus hydrogen concentration (ppm) in sensing layer for reported buffer thickness b = 2 µm (---) optimized buffer thicknesses b = 0.62 µm (-) with Pd layer thickness of 20 nm and optimized Pd layer thickness 26 nm.
Proceedings 02 01078 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, M.P.; Chaurasia, S. Influence of Buffer Thickness on Sensitivity of Pd-Coated Side Polished Single Mode Optical Fiber Hydrogen Sensor. Proceedings 2018, 2, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131078

AMA Style

Singh MP, Chaurasia S. Influence of Buffer Thickness on Sensitivity of Pd-Coated Side Polished Single Mode Optical Fiber Hydrogen Sensor. Proceedings. 2018; 2(13):1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Mukesh P., and Santosh Chaurasia. 2018. "Influence of Buffer Thickness on Sensitivity of Pd-Coated Side Polished Single Mode Optical Fiber Hydrogen Sensor" Proceedings 2, no. 13: 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131078

APA Style

Singh, M. P., & Chaurasia, S. (2018). Influence of Buffer Thickness on Sensitivity of Pd-Coated Side Polished Single Mode Optical Fiber Hydrogen Sensor. Proceedings, 2(13), 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131078

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop