1. Introduction
Recently, carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites have attracted interest in the automotive industry [
1]. These composites exhibit higher strength in the longitudinal direction than in the transverse direction of the fibers [
2], making fiber orientation evaluation crucial. Carbon fibers have higher thermal diffusivity than resin [
3]. Consequently, the thermal diffusivity along the carbon fibers in CFRP composites is high. As a pioneering study on fiber orientation evaluation in CFRP composites, Fujita and Nagano [
3] proposed a method based on the in-plane thermal diffusivity distribution obtained using laser spot-periodic heating and a lock-in-type infrared camera. However, this method requires an expensive infrared measurement system to synchronously obtain the laser heating signal and the temperature response. Therefore, the development of a simple, low-cost method for evaluating fiber orientation is beneficial.
In this study, a method for evaluating fiber orientation using halogen spot-periodic heating and a non-lock-in-type infrared camera was employed and applied to a unidirectional carbon fiber composite—a CFRP composite with unidirectional continuous fibers.
2. Evaluation of Fiber Orientation
The employed method requires no synchronous measurement of the heating signal and the temperature response.
Figure 1 depicts the procedure for measuring the in-plane thermal diffusivity to evaluate fiber orientation. As depicted in
Figure 1a, a plate is subjected to spot-periodic heating using a lamp controlled by a function generator, and its periodic temperature response on the rear surface is measured using an infrared camera. As depicted in
Figure 1b, the slope
for a certain in-plane direction is calculated. In
Figure 1b, the center corresponds to a point directly behind the heating spot. Furthermore, the thermal diffusivity for a certain in-plane direction is calculated using the following equation [
3]:
where
is the in-plane thermal diffusivity for the direction at an angle
from the vertical axis and
is the heating frequency. Herein, the phase lag (
) between the periodic heating signal and the temperature response is calculated using the following equation:
where
and
are the initial phases of the fundamental harmonic in the periodic temperature response at any point and the center, respectively.
In this study, fiber orientation in CFRP composites is evaluated based on their in-plane thermal diffusivity distribution.
3. Materials and Methods
A square plate of a unidirectional carbon fiber composite, fabricated by laminating 10 plies of prepreg sheets (Toray, Tokyo, Japan, T700SC/#2300) via autoclave molding, was utilized. This square plate had a side length of 150 mm and a thickness of 2 mm. The mass content of polyacrylonitrile-based continuous carbon fibers in the epoxy resin of the square plate was 67%, and the carbon fibers were aligned unidirectionally. Herein, this square plate is referred to as a UD specimen. Additionally, a blackbody paint was sprayed on the UD specimen’s surface.
A halogen lamp (Fintech Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, HSH12) capable of heating a spot on the UD specimen’s surface with a diameter of 1.5 mm was utilized. The halogen lamp, controlled by a function generator, provided sinusoidal spot-periodic heating to the central portion of the UD specimen at a frequency of 0.01 Hz. On the rear side, temperature-distribution images on the UD specimen’s surface, subjected to the sinusoidal spot-periodic heating, were captured using a non-lock-in-type infrared camera (NEC Avio Infrared Technologies, Tokyo, Japan, InfReC R300SR) with a spatial resolution of 0.2 mm/pixel. The time-series temperature-distribution images, consisting of 100 frames recorded at a frame rate of 0.2 Hz, were then analyzed in the frequency domain. Consequently, the amplitude and initial phase of the fundamental harmonic in the periodic temperature response were obtained pixel by pixel.
4. Results and Discussion
In the experiments to evaluate fiber orientation in CFRP composites, the UD specimen was placed with its carbon fibers oriented horizontally.
Figure 2 shows the distributions of the amplitude and initial phase of the fundamental harmonic in the periodic temperature response of the UD specimen. As shown in
Figure 2, both the amplitude and initial phase exhibit anisotropic distributions.
The in-plane thermal diffusivity distribution was obtained. First, a point at which the maximum amplitude of the fundamental harmonic in the periodic temperature response was observed in
Figure 2a was regarded as the center. Subsequently, the phase lag (
) between the periodic heating signal and the temperature response was calculated pixel by pixel using the initial phases shown in
Figure 2b and Equation (2). Finally, the thermal diffusivities for specific in-plane directions were calculated using Equation (1),and the results are shown in
Figure 3. The x-axis values in the figure represent the angles of in-plane directions measured clockwise from the vertical axis. The y-axis values in the figure represent the in-plane thermal diffusivities normalized to the maximum thermal diffusivity among all in-plane directions. The slope
was calculated using data in the straight section (
) for each in-plane direction. As shown in
Figure 3, the in-plane thermal diffusivity in the fiber direction is significantly higher than that in other directions. This anisotropy is attributed to the higher thermal diffusivity of carbon fibers compared with that of resin. Consequently, the employed method successfully evaluated fiber orientation in unidirectional carbon fiber composites.
5. Conclusions
In this study, a method for evaluating fiber orientation using halogen spot-periodic heating and a non-lock-in-type infrared camera was employed and applied to a unidirectional carbon fiber composite. The employed method required no synchronous measurement of the heating signal and the temperature response. Experimental results showed that the in-plane thermal diffusivity in the fiber direction was significantly higher than that in other directions. This anisotropy is attributed to the higher thermal diffusivity of carbon fibers compared with that of resin. Therefore, the employed method successfully evaluated fiber orientation in unidirectional carbon fiber composites.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.A. and Y.H.; methodology, A.A.; software, Y.S.; validation, A.A., Y.H., Y.S. and A.M.; formal analysis, A.A.; investigation, A.A.; resources, A.A., Y.H. and Y.S.; data curation, A.A., Y.H. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.; writing—review and editing, Y.H. and Y.S.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, A.M.; project administration, A.A. and Y.H.; funding acquisition, A.A., Y.H. and A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was a collaborative effort between Kyoto University of Education and Toyota Motor Corporation. It was also supported by Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No data are publicly available.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Tetsuro Nambu (Fintech Tokyo Ltd.) and Nobuhiro Fukuyama and Shuichi Miyagawa (Nippon Avionics Co., Ltd.) for their technical contributions.
Conflicts of Interest
Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc. have no commercial conflict of interest.
References
- Hamada, Y.; Ishigami, Y.; Mikuni, A.; Kitakata, S. Study reliability evaluation of C-SMC by acoustic emission. Trans. Soc. Automot. Eng. Jpn. 2021, 52, 1027–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akai, A.; Sato, Y.; Hamada, Y.; Mikuni, A. Fatigue damage evaluation of discontinuous carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites using thermoelastic temperature variations. Exp. Tech. 2025, 49, 609–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujita, R.; Nagano, H. Novel fiber orientation evaluation method for CFRP/CFRTP based on measurement of anisotropic in-plane thermal diffusivity distribution. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 140, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).