Background:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients frequently receive multiple concomitant drugs, raising the risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). We analyzed 107 COPD prescriptions (ICD-10 code J44.0–J44.9), evaluating demographics and DDI severity to identify the most common major interactions and their corresponding patient profiles.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study of prescriptions (ICD-10 codes J44.0–J44.9) dispensed over three months at a community pharmacy. For each prescription, we recorded the patient’s age, sex, comorbid diagnoses, and drugs. DDI assessments performed using Drugs.com categorize them as major, moderate, minor, or none [
1]. Patients were stratified into six age groups (40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and >90 years). All procedures adhered to ethical standards and followed the guidelines for research involving human data.
Results and discussion:
The dataset included 107 prescriptions with ICD-10 codes J44.0–J44.9, of which 78 (72.9%) were for males and 29 (27.1%) were for females. The mean age was 66.9 ± 12.0 years (range: 43–92), with a median of 67 years. The age-group breakdown was as follows: 40–49 years, 10.3% (
n = 11); 50–59 years, 18.7% (
n = 20); 60–69 years, 23.4% (
n = 25); 70–79 years, 30.8% (
n = 33); 80–89 years, 15.0% (
n = 16); and >90 years, 1.9% (
n = 2). In total, 58 (54.2%) prescriptions showed no interactions, 33 (30.8%) had moderate interactions, 16 (15.0%) featured major interactions, and none exhibited minor interactions. Major DDIs were more frequent in males (14 of 16; 87.5%) versus females (2 of 16; 12.5%) and clustered in older age brackets: 80–89 years accounted for 6 of 16 (37.5%), and 60–69 years accounted for 1 of 16 (6.3%), with the remaining split equally between 40–49 years and 80–89 years for the female cases. The most frequent major DDIs were exclusively observed in males over 60 years of age: carvedilol–theophylline (two occurrences in males: one aged 60–69 and one aged 80–89), nebivolol–theophylline (two prescriptions, both for males aged 80–89), and simvastatin–amlodipine (two occurrences in males aged 80–89). In patients with COPD, theophylline is an add-on therapy when bronchodilator therapy does not satisfactorily control the disease. Family doctors, not pulmonologists, usually prescribe theophylline; it appears in 27 prescriptions, but managing its adverse effects and interactions can be challenging due to its narrow therapeutic index and the predominant hepatic CYP1A2 metabolism [
2,
3]. Combining theophylline with non-selective beta-blockers or high doses of beta-1-selective beta-blockers can produce severe bronchospasm due to the opposite pharmacological effects. Although beta-1-cardioselective beta-blockers do not generally inhibit the bronchodilator effect of beta-2-adrenergic agonists, they can still cause acute bronchospasm in COPD patients despite their relative selectivity for beta-1 receptors in cardiac tissues [
4,
5,
6].
Conclusions:
Over half of COPD prescriptions demonstrated no DDIs; however, 15% exhibited major interactions, predominantly involving combinations of cardioactive and theophylline-based agents in older male patients. These preliminary results facilitate COPD patient phenotyping and personalized treatment based on demographic and pharmacotherapy profiles [
5,
7,
8].
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.-M.D. and L.U.; methodology, M.-M.D. and S.-M.A.; formal analysis, M.-M.D. and S.-M.A.; investigation, M.-M.D.; data curation, M.-M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-M.D.; writing—review and editing, M.-M.D., S.-M.A. and L.U.; supervision, L.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of the “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (study protocol no. 61/05.12.2022) on 15 December 2022.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author due to the ethical restrictions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Available online: https://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.html (accessed on 15 June 2025).
- Hopkins, M.E.; MacKenzie-Ross, R.V. Case Report: The risks associated with chronic theophylline therapy and measures designed to improve monitoring and management. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2016, 17, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Sutrisna, E.M. The impact of CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 genes polymorphism on theophylline response. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. JCDR 2016, 10, FE01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agustı, A.; Celli, B.R.; Criner, G.J.; Halpin, D.; Anzueto, A.; Barnes, P.; Bourbeau, J.; Han, M.K.; Martinez, F.J.; de Oca, M.M.; et al. Pulmonary Perspective. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2023, 207, 819–837. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Divo, M.J.; Casanova, C.; Marin, J.M.; Pinto-Plata, V.M.; De-Torres, J.P.; Zulueta, J.J.; Cabrera, C.; Zagaceta, J.; Sanchez-Salcedo, P.; Berto, J.; et al. COPD comorbidities network. Eur. Respir. J. 2015, 46, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yousuf, A.; McAuley, H.; Elneima, O.; Brightling, C.E. The different phenotypes of COPD. Br. Med. Bull. 2021, 137, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Udrescu, L.; Udrescu, M.; Topirceanu, A.; Mihaicuta, S. A network-based approach to defining phenotypes in COPD. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 193, A3521. [Google Scholar]
- Suciu, L.; Ardelean, S.M.; Udrescu, M.; Goldiş, F.D.; Hânda, D.; Tuică, M.M.; Vasii, S.O.; Udrescu, L. Categorical Analysis of Database Consistency in Reporting Drug–Drug Interactions for Cardiovascular Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).