An Evaluative Approach of Corporate Sustainability in Agrifood System †
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Corporate Sustainability Approach in the Agrifood Enterprises
3. Methodology and Results
- Current performance: Through website analysis, using the 7S method;
- Key drivers: Identifying motivations to implement and improve CS (TPB analysis);
- Implementation: Propose possible short- and long-term actions and strategies to develop CS (Figure 1).
- Economic Sustainability (innovation; risk management; growth enhancement; competitive behavior);
- Environmental Sustainability (water and land emissions reductions; clean air; biodiversity; ecological impact);
- Social Sustainability (customer welfare; human rights; labor relations; gender free);
- Ethical Sustainability (jobs creation; skills enhancement; employee health and safety; diversity and inclusion);
- Circular Sustainability (resource efficiency; life cycle management; no waste);
- Climate Sustainability (environmental regulations; global climate change actions; energy management);
- Territorial Sustainability (local economic impacts; social investment; business ethics).
- Attitude: Favorable or unfavorable assessment of the individual to perform a behavior;
- Subjective norm: The individual’s perception of social pressure to perform or not perform a behavior;
- Perceived behavior control: The individual’s perception of the ability to perform a behavior.
4. Conclusions and Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
EU | European Union |
CS | Corporate Sustainability |
SDG | Sustainable Development Goal |
TPB | Theory of Planned Behavior |
NRRP | National Recovery and Resilience Plan |
CSRD | Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive |
References
- UN. Our Common Future; The World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- UN. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development; United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- OECD. Global Corporate Sustainability Report 2024; OECD: Paris, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. COM (2020) 98 Final. A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52020DC0098 (accessed on 13 April 2024).
- Rossi, E.S.; Materia, V.; Caracciolo, F.; Blasi, E.; Pascucci, S. Farmers in the transition toward sustainability: What is the role of their entrepreneurial identity? Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1196824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poponi, S.; Arcese, G.; Pacchera, F.; Martucci, O. Evaluating the transition to the circular economy in the agri-food sector: Selection of indicators. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 176, 105916. [Google Scholar]
- El Bilali, H.; Callenius, C.; Strassner, C.; Probst, L. Food and nutrition security and sustainability transitions in food systems. Food Energy Secur. 2019, 8, e00154. [Google Scholar]
- Scuderi, A.; Timpanaro, G.; Sturiale, L. Economic evaluation of innovative investiments in agri-food chain. Qual. Access Success 2018, 19, 482–488. [Google Scholar]
- Mirabella, C.; Borsellino, V.; Galati, A.; Schimmenti, E.; Caracciolo, F. Value-Belief and Value-Identity Norms in Ethical Food Consumption: Investigating the Influence of Worker-Friendly Labels in Italy. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2025, 32, 2582–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. COM(2011)681 Final. A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed on 23 April 2024).
- Sturiale, L.; Timpanaro, G.; La Via, G. The online sales models of fresh fruit and vegetables: Opportunities and limits for typical Italian products. Qual. Access Success 2017, 18, 444–451. [Google Scholar]
- Coppola, A.; Ianuario, S.; Romano, S.; Viccaro, M. Corporate social responsibility in agri-food firms: The relationship between CSR actions and firm’s performance. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2020, 7, 542–558. [Google Scholar]
- Fortunati, S.; Morea, D.; Mosconi, E.M. Circular economy and corporate social responsibility in the agricultural system: Cases study of the Italian agri-food industry. Agric. Econ. 2020, 66, 489–498. [Google Scholar]
- Cayzer, S.; Griffiths, P.; Beghetto, V. Design of indicators for measuring product performance in the circular economy. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2017, 10, 289–298. [Google Scholar]
- Elia, V.; Gnoni, M.G.; Tornese, F. Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142 Pt 4, 2741–2751. [Google Scholar]
- Corona, B.; Shen, L.; Reike, D.; Carreón, J.R.; Worrell, E. Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 151, 104498. [Google Scholar]
- Opferkuch, K.; Caeiro, S.; Salomone, R.; Ramos, T. Circular economy in corporate sustainability reporting: A review of organisational approaches. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 4015–4036. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, L.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Li, H. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual’s energy saving behavior in workplaces. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 107–113. [Google Scholar]
- Senger, I.; Borges, J.A.R.; Machado, J.A.D. Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural production. J. Rural. Stud. 2017, 49, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
- Tama, R.A.Z.; Ying, L.; Yu, M.; Hoque, M.; Adnan, K.M.; Sarker, S.A. Assessing farmers’ intention towards conservation agriculture by using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111654. [Google Scholar]
- Sarkar, A.; Wang, H.; Rahman, A.; Azim, J.A.; Memon, W.H.; Qian, L. Structural equation model of young farmers’ intention to adopt sustainable agriculture: A case study in Bangladesh. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2022, 37, 142–154. [Google Scholar]
- Foti, V.T.; Sturiale, L.; Timpanaro, G. An overview of food waste phenomenon: By problem to resource. Qual. Success 2018, 19, 232–240. [Google Scholar]
- Capaldi, N. The Sins of the CSR Movement: Errors in CSR. In Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sturiale, L.; Scuderi, A.; Pecorino, B.; Timpanaro, G. Experiences of online purchase of food products in Italy during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Lect. Notes Netw. Syst. 2022, 482, 1400–1414. [Google Scholar]
- Brunori, G.; Bacco, M.; Puerta-Piñero, C.; Borzacchiello, M.T.; Stormer, E. Agri-food data spaces: Highlighting the need for a farm-centered strategy. Data Brief 2025, 59, 111388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revelli, C. A critical analysis of socially responsible investment (SRI): Meta-debate and development perspectives. In Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2016; Volume 2, pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Sturiale, L.; Scuderi, A. Information and communication technology (ICT) and adjustment of the marketing strategy in the agrifood system in Italy. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2011, 1152, 77–87. [Google Scholar]
- Scuderi, A.; Sturiale, L. Social commerce and marketing strategy for “made in Italy” food products. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2015, 1498, 509–519. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, K.H.; Ojha, R.; Nayga, R.M. Good for the environment and safer? Food safety halo effect of eco-labels. Food Qual. Prefer. 2025, 133, 105629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, M.B.; Vergamini, D.; Brunori, G. Food Supply Chain: A Framework for the Governance of Digital Traceability. Foods 2025, 14, 2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Directive (EU) 2022/2464 as Regards Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj/eng#:~:text=Directive%20%28EU%29%202022%2F2464%20of%20the%20European%20Parliament%20and,corporate%20sustainability%20reporting%20%28Text%20with%20EEA%20relevance%29%20PE%2F35%2F2022%2FREV%2F1 (accessed on 20 April 2024).
- European Commission. Implementing and Delegated Acts—CSRD. 2023. Available online: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/regulation-and-supervision/financial-services-legislation/implementing-and-delegated-acts/corporate-sustainability-reporting-directive_en (accessed on 23 May 2024).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sturiale, L.; Zarbà, C.; Cammarata, M.; Matarazzo, A.; Scuderi, A. An Evaluative Approach of Corporate Sustainability in Agrifood System. Proceedings 2025, 117, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117034
Sturiale L, Zarbà C, Cammarata M, Matarazzo A, Scuderi A. An Evaluative Approach of Corporate Sustainability in Agrifood System. Proceedings. 2025; 117(1):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117034
Chicago/Turabian StyleSturiale, Luisa, Carla Zarbà, Mariarita Cammarata, Agata Matarazzo, and Alessandro Scuderi. 2025. "An Evaluative Approach of Corporate Sustainability in Agrifood System" Proceedings 117, no. 1: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117034
APA StyleSturiale, L., Zarbà, C., Cammarata, M., Matarazzo, A., & Scuderi, A. (2025). An Evaluative Approach of Corporate Sustainability in Agrifood System. Proceedings, 117(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117034