Statement of Peer Review †
- Type of peer review: double-blind. The conference papers were sent anonymously to two reviewers, who in turn conducted reviews though a template review form that was sent to them beforehand.
- Conference submission management system: email.
- Number of submissions sent for review: 43.
- Number of submissions accepted: 30.
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 69.8%.
- Average number of reviews per paper: two.
- Total number of reviewers involved: three.
- Any additional information on the review process: NA.
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tsourela, M.; Paschaloudis, D.; Achillas, C. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings 2024, 111, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024111031
Tsourela M, Paschaloudis D, Achillas C. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings. 2024; 111(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024111031
Chicago/Turabian StyleTsourela, Maria, Dimitris Paschaloudis, and Charisios Achillas. 2024. "Statement of Peer Review" Proceedings 111, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024111031
APA StyleTsourela, M., Paschaloudis, D., & Achillas, C. (2024). Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings, 111(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024111031
