Next Article in Journal
Study of Structure and Electrochemical Properties of LaFeO3 and La2FeO4 as Electrode Materials for Super-Capacitor Application
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Biodiesel Blends with Nanoparticles in Variable Compression Ratio Engines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Municipal Solid Waste Biogas Production Enhancement Using a Hybrid Landfill Bioreactor: A Case Study †

1
Department of Chemical, Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
2
Department of Chemical Engineering Technology, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2088, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Processes—Green and Sustainable Process Engineering and Process Systems Engineering (ECP 2024), 29–31 May 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ECP2024.
Proceedings 2024, 105(1), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105069
Published: 28 May 2024
This study aimed to investigate the application of hybrid bioreactor technology for biogas production enhancement from a municipal solid waste organic fraction (OFMSW). Two bioreactor (Br) columns were operated for up to seven (7) months to simulate a typical (Br-1) and a hybrid (Br-2) landfill bioreactor, respectively. The OFMSW used included kitchen, garden, and paper waste at a ratio of 16:3:1. Partial aeration during the first stage was practiced, and diluted leachate with water was recirculated throughout the operation in Br-2 while tap water was added in Br-1 for humidification. The results showed that partial aeration and diluted leachate recirculation led to greater performance in terms of accelerated methanogenesis onset and biogas production enhancement. Methanogenesis onset occurred after 90 days for Br-2, while it was realized after 143 days for Br-1. A biogas accumulation of 21.52 L at an average rate of 0.12 L/day was produced from Br-2, which was higher than the volume of accumulated biogas produced in Br-1 of 8.75 L, averaging 0.05 L/day for 7 months. The leachate pH slowly increased and fluctuated around 7 in Br-1, while in Br-2, it quickly increased from 5.24 to 8.2 during the methanation phase. The reduction in TOC (260 mg/L) and COD (4000 mg/L) indicated the maturation phase of the leachate in Br-2, while Br-1 had high values of TOC (461.1 mg/L) and COD (10,000 mg/L) ranging within the methanation phase after 6 months of operation. The TOC/COD ratio of 0.63 was also indicative of a stabilized leachate in Br-2, while Br-1 had a lower ratio than 0.5. The results indicated that diluted leachate recirculation and partial aeration had a considerable effect on biogas production and the onset of methanogenesis. Partial aeration introduced oxygen into the process, while leachate recirculation re-introduced the discharged nutrients with water, diluting the high concentration of leachate pollutants.

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.L.; methodology, K.L.; validation, K.P.; formal analysis, K.L.; investigation, K.L.; resources, K.P., M.M. and K.L.; data curation, K.L.; writing-original draft preparation, K.L.; writing-review and editing, K.P. and M.M.; visualization, K.L.; supervision, K.P. and M.M.; project administration, K.L. and M.M.; funding acquisition, K.P. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant No: TTK2204224344).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lepota, K.; Premlall, K.; Mabuza, M. Municipal Solid Waste Biogas Production Enhancement Using a Hybrid Landfill Bioreactor: A Case Study. Proceedings 2024, 105, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105069

AMA Style

Lepota K, Premlall K, Mabuza M. Municipal Solid Waste Biogas Production Enhancement Using a Hybrid Landfill Bioreactor: A Case Study. Proceedings. 2024; 105(1):69. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lepota, Khanyisile, Kasturie Premlall, and Major Mabuza. 2024. "Municipal Solid Waste Biogas Production Enhancement Using a Hybrid Landfill Bioreactor: A Case Study" Proceedings 105, no. 1: 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105069

APA Style

Lepota, K., Premlall, K., & Mabuza, M. (2024). Municipal Solid Waste Biogas Production Enhancement Using a Hybrid Landfill Bioreactor: A Case Study. Proceedings, 105(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024105069

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop