Next Article in Journal
Sensitivity of Precipitation to Aerosol and Temperature Perturbation over the Foothills of the Nepal Himalayas
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Fragmentation of Acetylene by VUV Double Photoionization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

GO/2D WS2 Based Humidity Sensor †

by
Elisabetta Comini
1,
Gorgio Sberveglieri
1,*,
Anurat Wisitsora-at
2,
Zdenek Sofer
3,
Carmen C. Mayorga Martinez
4,
Martin Pumera
4 and
Wojtek Wlodarski
5,*
1
Sensor Laboratory, Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy
2
Nanoelectronics and MEMS Laboratory, National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, KlongLuang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
3
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
4
School of Physical, Mathematical Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore
5
School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Eurosensors 2017 Conference, Paris, France, 3–6 September 2017.
Proceedings 2017, 1(4), 469; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040469
Published: 11 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of Proceedings of Eurosensors 2017, Paris, France, 3–6 September 2017)

Abstract

:
In this work, 2D WS2 nanosheets prepared by the exfoliation of WS2 with Li-intercalation was combined with GO produced by the Hummer method for humidity sensing applications. The GO and WS2 solutions were mixed with an equal concentration and coated on conductometric transducers. Sensing measurements towards humidity (0–80% RH) at room temperature revealed that the humidity response of hybrid was substantially higher by a factor of 3–9 depending on the RH value compared with those of GO and WS2. Moreover, no cross sensitivity to common gaseous compounds was observed. Therefore, the GO/2D WS2 composite is a highly promising humidity sensor.

1. Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) nanostructures of transition metal dicalchogenide (TMD) such as tungsten disulfide (WS2) and moblybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets have earned considerable interest in humidity-sensing applications due its large specific surface area, rapid charge transport and 2D-quantum effects [1,2,3]. In particular, WS2, a n-type semiconductor with a band gap of 1.3–1.4 eV has been widely used in the fields of sensors, solar cells, photocatalysts, energy storage, filed effect transistors and biosensors due to its unique semiconducting and 2D properties [4,5]. Similarly, 2D graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets are known to be promising for humidity sensing at room temperature [6,7,8]. However, there has been no report of their combination for humidity sensing.
In this work, the advantageous properties of two 2D materials are combined by forming WS2/GO heterostructures, presenting a new humidity sensor based on WS2-GO composite. GO/2D WS2 nanohybrid are prepared by the exfoliation of graphite and WS2 powders and is systematically studied for humidity sensing at room temperature. Its performance is compared with those of GO and 2D WS2.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of SnS2 Nanostructures

2D WS2 sheets were prepared by exfoliation of WS2 following the protocol described previously [5]. A suspension of 3 g of WS2 bulk powder in 20 mL of 1.7 M tert-butyl-lithium in pentane was prepared and then stirred for 72 h at 25 °C in argon atmosphere. The Li-intercalated material was separated by filtration in argon atmosphere and the intercalated compound was washed several times with hexane. Next, the separated TMDs with intercalated Li was placed in water (100 mL) and repeatedly centrifuged. The obtained material was then dried in vacuum oven at 50 °C for 48 h. GO solution was prepared by the standard Hummer method. The as-prepared material was characterized by Transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM and SEM).

2.2. Sensors Preparation and Characterization

The transducers were made of alumina planar substrates (3 mm × 3 mm) equipped with 2 pairs of conductometric transducers. The GO and 2D WS2 solutions were mixed with the ratio of 1:1 (2.5:2.5 mg/mL) and then deposited on conductometric transducers with interdigitaed electrodes. Morphological analysis was carried out by SEM. The sensors were then introduced in a stainless-steel test chamber for the sensing tests. Gas and humidity sensing tests have been carried out by the flow through method in a thermostatic sealed chamber with controlled temperature and humidity with the setup reported earlier [9]. Dry air certified bottles have been used as gas source and certified mass flow controllers to reproduce desired gaseous composition inside the test chamber. The sensors were tested toward humidity with RH values in the range of 0–80% at room temperature. Nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen, ammonia, acetone and ethanol were also tested as possible interfering species at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization Results

A detailed characterization result of the 2D-WS2 nanostructure using TEM has been reported previously [2]. It was shown that nanosheet structures contain highly ordered crystal domains of WS2. On an edge, layer fringes analysis revealed that the number of WS2 atomic layers is 3–4 and the distance between adjacent layers is also close to 0.6 nm. In contrast, GO was highly disorder and mostly monolayer with lattice spacing of around 0.3 nm.

3.2. Sensing Results

Figure 1 reports the conductance of 2D WS2, GO and hybrid GO/2D WS2 in response to a sequence of humidity pulses with RH ranging from 0% to 80%. It is seen that the conductance values of all sensors increase rapidly upon exposure to humidity, indicating charge transfer from H2O molecules to sensor surface. In addition, the 2D WS2 based sensor exhibits relatively high baseline conductance but low humidity response compared with the GO one. After combining them into the hybrid film, the baseline conductance decreases greatly by more than two orders of magnitude while the humidity response is substantially higher than that of GO by a factor of 3–9 depending on the RH value. Moreover, no cross sensitivity to other tested gaseous compounds was observed at room temperature. Therefore, the combination of GO and 2D WS2 is an effective mean to enhance the humidity response of 2D nanostructure and the GO/2D WS2 hybrid structure is promising for highly sensitive and selective humidity measurement.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, nanocomposite containing 2D WS2 nanosheets prepared by the exfoliation of WS2 with Li-intercalation and GO produced by the Hummer method have been studied for humidity sensing applications. The GO and WS2 solutions were mixed with an equal concentration and coated on conductometric transducers. Sensing measurements towards humidity (0–80% RH) at room temperature revealed that the humidity response of hybrid was substantially higher by a factor of 3–9 depending on the RH value compared with those of GO and WS2. Moreover, the composite sensor display no cross sensitivity to common gaseous compounds including nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen, ammonia, acetone and ethanol. Therefore, the GO/2D WS2 composite is highly promising for humidity sensing applications.

Author Contributions

E.C. and G.S. performed gas-sensing measurements, A.W.-a. and W.W. offered concepts and wrote the manuscript. Z.S., C.C.M.M. and M.P. prepared the sensor materials. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H.S.; Eda, G.; Li, L.-J.; Loh, K.P.; Zhang, H. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ambrosi, A.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. 2H → 1T phase transition and hydrogen evolution activity of MoS2, MoSe2, WS2 and WSe2 strongly depends on the MX2 composition. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xu, M.; Liang, T.; Shi, M.; Chen, H. Graphene-Like Two-Dimensional Materials. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Leonardi, S.; Wlodarski, W.; Li, Y.; Donato, N.; Neri, G.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Hydrogen Sensors Based on 2D WO3 Nanosheets Prepared by Anodization. Analyst 2017, in press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ambrosi, A.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Lithium Intercalation Compound Dramatically Influences the Electrochemical Properties of Exfoliated MoS2. Small 2015, 11, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Feng, J.; Kang, X.; Zuo, Q.; Yuan, C.; Wang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, L.; Lu, H.; Chen, J. Fabrication and Evaluation of a Graphene Oxide-Based Capacitive Humidity Sensor. Sensors 2016, 16, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bi, H.; Yin, K.; Xie, X.; Ji, J.; Wan, S.; Sun, L.; Terrones, M.; Dresselhaus, M.S. Ultrahigh humidity sensitivity of graphene oxide. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Guo, L.; Jiang, H.-B.; Shao, R.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Xie, S.-Y.; Wang, J.-N.; Li, X.-B.; Jiang, F.; Chen, Q.-D.; Zhang, T.; et al. Two-beam-laser interference mediated reduction, patterning and nanostructuring of graphene oxide for the production of a flexible humidity sensing device. Carbon 2012, 50, 1667–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Endres, H.E.; Jander, H.D.; Gottler, W. A test system for gas sensors. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 1995, 26, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conductance variations of GO, 2D WS2 and GO/2D WS2 sensors subjected to various pulses of humidity with RH values ranging from 0% to 80% at room temperature.
Figure 1. Conductance variations of GO, 2D WS2 and GO/2D WS2 sensors subjected to various pulses of humidity with RH values ranging from 0% to 80% at room temperature.
Proceedings 01 00469 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Comini, E.; Sberveglieri, G.; Wisitsora-at, A.; Sofer, Z.; Martinez, C.C.M.; Pumera, M.; Wlodarski, W. GO/2D WS2 Based Humidity Sensor. Proceedings 2017, 1, 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040469

AMA Style

Comini E, Sberveglieri G, Wisitsora-at A, Sofer Z, Martinez CCM, Pumera M, Wlodarski W. GO/2D WS2 Based Humidity Sensor. Proceedings. 2017; 1(4):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Comini, Elisabetta, Gorgio Sberveglieri, Anurat Wisitsora-at, Zdenek Sofer, Carmen C. Mayorga Martinez, Martin Pumera, and Wojtek Wlodarski. 2017. "GO/2D WS2 Based Humidity Sensor" Proceedings 1, no. 4: 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1040469

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop