Next Article in Journal
Improving Nitrogen Fertilization Recommendations in Temperate Agricultural Systems: A Study on Walloon Soils Using Anaerobic Incubation and POxC
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Nitrogen Availability and Crop Productivity Using Bioameliorants in Maize–Soybean Intercropping on Suboptimal Land
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Role of Fungi in N2O Emissions from Nitrogen-Fertilized Lawn Soil

1
School of Landscape Architecture, Liaoning Agricultural Vocational and Technical College, Yingkou 115009, China
2
College of Agriculture and Horticulture, Liaoning Agricultural Vocational and Technical College, Yingkou 115009, China
3
College of Life and Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China
4
Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
5
Weifang Institute of Modern Agriculture and Ecological Environment, Weifang 261041, China
6
Key Laboratory of Stable Isotope Techniques and Applications, Shenyang 110016, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nitrogen 2025, 6(4), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen6040090
Submission received: 16 August 2025 / Revised: 21 September 2025 / Accepted: 26 September 2025 / Published: 1 October 2025

Abstract

Urban lawns are a predominant form of vegetation in sports grounds and greenbelts. Nitrogen (N) fertilization is widely used to sustain lawn productivity. However, it also promotes nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, a potent greenhouse gas. The microbial mechanisms underlying N2O emissions from fertilized lawn soils remain poorly understood. In this study, we conducted a controlled incubation experiment with four N application rates [0 (N0), 100 (N100), 200 (N200), and 300 kg·ha−1·yr−1 (N300)] to investigate N2O emissions and associated microbial processes in urban lawn soil. Biological inhibitors combined with high-throughput sequencing were used to quantify the inhibitor-sensitive fraction of fungi and bacteria contributing to N2O emissions. Our results showed that N fertilizer significantly increased N2O emissions, with the highest emission observed under N200. The fungi inhibitor-sensitive fraction accounted for ~45% of total N2O emissions, significantly higher than that of bacteria (~31%). Dominant fungal phyla included Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota, with N fertilization significantly increasing the relative abundance of Ascomycota and decreasing that of Basidiomycota. Redundancy analysis revealed strong positive correlations between Ascomycota abundance and N2O emissions across N treatments. At the genus level, Pyrenochaetopsis, Myrothecium, and Humicola were positively associated with N2O production and identified as key functional taxa. These findings demonstrate that moderate N fertilization can disproportionately stimulate fungal-driven N2O emissions in urban lawns. The results provide a scientific basis for optimizing N fertilization strategies in green spaces, with implications for N policy and sustainable landscape management.

1. Introduction

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warming potential nearly 300 times that of carbon dioxide and a long atmospheric lifetime [1]. It also contributes substantially to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer [2]. As a key intermediate in the nitrogen (N) cycle, N2O emissions are strongly influenced by ecosystem type and land management practices. In particular, external N inputs—via fertilization or atmospheric deposition—can significantly alter soil N status and subsequently influence N2O production [3,4,5].
Numerous studies have demonstrated that N fertilization enhances N2O emissions [6,7,8,9]. For example, fertilization significantly increased N2O fluxes from urban lawn soils in Baltimore and Phoenix, USA, likely due to substantial N inputs for turf maintenance [10,11]. However, the shape of the N input-N2O response curve remains debated, with either linear or non-linear relationships reported [12,13]. These discrepancies suggest that the magnitude and direction of fertilizer effects are context-dependent, influenced by fertilizer type, soil characteristics, vegetation, and microbial activity [14,15]. A clearer understanding of the N2O response to fertilization is therefore essential for developing effective N management strategies.
N2O production in soils is primarily mediated by nitrification and denitrification processes [16]. Bacteria have traditionally been regarded as the main drivers of these processes [17]. Recent evidence, however, suggests that fungi also contribute substantially to N2O production [18]. For instance, studies in the arid grasslands of the southwestern United States and on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in China identified fungi as the dominant contributors to N2O emissions via heterotrophic nitrification and denitrification [19,20]. In contrast, bacterial dominance has been reported in intensively managed croplands in northern China [21]. These contrasting findings underscore that the relative roles of fungi and bacteria in N2O emissions vary across ecosystems and vegetation types, highlighting the need for site-specific evaluations.
Urban lawns represent one of the most extensive types of managed green spaces. Dense turf roots, frequent irrigation, and anthropogenically altered urban soils create microsites with heterogeneous oxygen, carbon, and nitrate availability that may favor fungal processes such as heterotrophic nitrification and denitrification [22,23]. These conditions could enhance fungal activity relative to bacterial activity in lawns, yet empirical evidence remains scarce [19,24,25,26,27]. Our previous work showed that N fertilization significantly increased N2O emissions from lawn soils, with autotrophic nitrification accounting for approximately 63% of the emissions [28]. However, the relative contributions of fungi and bacteria to these emissions remain unresolved.
In this study, we examined the effects of different N fertilizer application rates (0, 100, 200, and 300 kg ha−1 yr−1) on N2O emissions and associated microbial communities in lawn soil using incubation experiments combined with biological inhibitors and high-throughput sequencing. We hypothesized that (1) N2O emissions would increase with N application rate, and (2) fungi would contribute more strongly to N2O emissions than bacteria. Our findings aim to provide new insights into the microbial mechanisms driving N2O emissions from urban lawn soils and to inform strategies for emission mitigation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Experimental Design

This study was conducted at Nanhu Park, located in Shenyang, Liaoning Province, Northeast China (123°40′ E, 41°48′ N). The region has a temperate semi-humid continental climate, with a mean annual temperature of 6.5 °C and annual precipitation of approximately 700 mm. The soil is classified as brown soil. The baseline soil properties were measured as follows: soil organic carbon (SOC) 7.33 g·kg−1, total nitrogen (TN) 0.93 g·kg−1, ammonium N (NH4+-N) 3.21 mg·kg−1, nitrate N (NO3-N) 25.99 mg·kg−1, available phosphorus (P) 12.36 mg·kg−1, available potassium (K) 98.96 mg·kg−1, and pH 7.0. The lawn was established on 7 May 2016, and consisted of Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass).
Four N fertilization levels were applied based on standard lawn management practices in northern China: 0 (N0, control), 100 (N100), 200 (N200), and 300 (N300) kg·ha−1·yr−1. Each treatment had three replicates (n = 3), randomly distributed in 1 × 1 m plots (12 in total). Urea was applied twice annually (15 April and 15 August) over two consecutive years, followed immediately by sprinkler irrigation. This approach reflected typical lawn management practices in northern Chinese cities to sustain turf density and color [28].
Soil samples were collected on August 16, one day after the second fertilization. Five soil cores (0–20 cm depth) were randomly taken from each plot and composited. The samples were transported to the laboratory within 24 h, sieved (<2 mm), and split into two subsamples: one for physicochemical analysis and the other for microbial DNA extraction.

2.2. Potential N2O Emissions

To assess the N2O emission potential, 30 g of air-dried soil (adjusted to 50% water-holding capacity, WHC) were placed in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks sealed with silicone rubber stoppers fitted with the three-way valves. The soils were pre-incubated at 25 °C and 50% WHC to activate microbial processes. The temperature of 25 °C was chosen to approximate the mean summer soil temperature in the study region, while 50% WHC represented moderate moisture conditions. Flasks were aerated daily by removing the stoppers for 1 h to prevent complete oxygen depletion and to simulate field gas exchange associated with soil macropore connectivity and surface aeration after irrigation events.
The experiment included four fertilization treatments, each with three replicates (n = 3), totaling 12 soils. Gas and soil samples were destructively collected on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 15 from the start of the incubation, resulting in a total of 84 (12 × 7) flasks for soil incubation. For gas samples, 50 mL syringes were used to draw gas from the flasks, transferred to gas sampling bags for subsequent N2O analysis. After gas sampling, the remaining soil was used for NH4+-N and NO3-N analysis.
N2O concentrations were determined using an Agilent 7890 GC equipped with an Electron Capture Detector (ECD) and an HP-PLOT Q column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 20 µm; Agilent). High-purity N2 served as the carrier gas (2.0 mL∙min−1). Calibration was performed every 12 samples with 5, 20, and 200 ppm N2O standards (National Center for Standard Matters, Beijing, China), yielding R2 > 0.999. Ambient-air blanks were run at the start and end to check for carryover. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) were 0.05 and 0.15 ppm (S/N = 3 and 10). Data were accepted only when the coefficient of variation in standards was <1%. Peak integration and quantification were performed using Agilent ChemStation with manual baseline verification. N2O fluxes were calculated as follows [29,30,31]:
F = ( C C 0 ) × V × M × [ 273 / ( 273 + T ) ] d × m × 22 . 4 × 1000
where F = N2O flux (μg·kg−1·d−1); C = N2O concentration at sampling (μL·L−1); C0 = Initial N2O concentration (μL·L−1); V = Headspace volume (mL); M = Molecular weight of N2O (44 g·mol−1); T = Temperature (°C); d = Incubation time (h); m = Dry weight of soil (g).

2.3. Quantifying the Inhibitor-Sensitive Fraction of N2O Emissions

Only N0 soil was used in the next experiment. To distinguish the fungal and bacterial inhibitor-sensitive fractions of N2O emissions, four treatments were established [19,32,33,34]: (A) no-inhibitor, control; (B) fungal inhibitor, cycloheximide at 1.5 mg g−1; (C) bacterial inhibitor, streptomycin at 3.0 mg g−1; (D) both fungal and bacterial inhibitor, cycloheximide at 1.5 mg g−1 and streptomycin at 3.0 mg g−1.
Cycloheximide (a eukaryotic protein synthesis inhibitor) was selected to suppress active fungal metabolism, while streptomycin (an aminoglycoside antibiotic targeting bacterial 30S ribosomes) was selected to suppress bacterial activity. These concentrations were chosen based on prior soil incubation studies and preliminary trials that balanced inhibitory efficacy and soil sorption effects [19,32,33,34].
It is important to note that no inhibitor is perfectly specific in soil matrices: cycloheximide primarily affects eukaryotic ribosomes and so may have limited impacts on some soil protists or fauna; streptomycin targets many bacteria but has variable efficacy across taxa and can be adsorbed to soil particles, reducing bioavailability. Both inhibitors may also indirectly affect non-target taxa through alteration of substrate competition and community interactions [33]. The combined-inhibition treatment (cycloheximide + streptomycin) indicates the maximum achievable reduction in biological N2O production.
Due to potential non-specific effects and differential sorption, the inhibitor-based partitioning provides a relative estimate of the fungal versus bacterial inhibitor-sensitive fractions rather than an absolute measurement. Therefore, we interpret the inhibitor results in conjunction with high-throughput ITS community profiles (Section 2.5) to identify taxa associated with N2O production [32,33,34].
The fungal and bacterial inhibitor-sensitive fractions of N2O emissions were calculated using the following formula:
Fungal   inhibitor-sensitive   fraction   ( % )   = 100 × A B A D
Bacterial   inhibitor-sensitive   fraction   ( % ) = 100 × A C A D
Other   microbial   inhibitor-sensitive   fraction   ( % ) = 100 % Equation   ( 2 ) Equation   ( 3 )
where A = N2O flux in control; B = N2O flux with fungal inhibitor; C = N2O flux with bacterial inhibitor; D = N2O flux with both inhibitors.

2.4. Soil Physicochemical Analyses

Soil NH4+-N and NO3-N were extracted using 2 M KCl (1:5 soil-to-solution ratio) and measured with a SmartChem140 Auto Analyzer (AMS, Rome, Italy). SOC was determined via the potassium dichromate oxidation method, and TN was analyzed using the Kjeldahl digestion method. Soil pH was measured with a pH meter (pHS-3C) in a 1:2.5 soil-to-water suspension.

2.5. Microbial Community Analysis

Soils from 4 treatments were used to measure ITS community profiles. Total DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of fresh soil using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplicon libraries were prepared using tagged universal fungal primers (ITS5 and ITS4), which target the internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 (ITS1&2). Each of the 18 DNA samples was amplified separately using the fusion primer pair ITS5 (5′-A (6 bp MID) ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC-3′) and ITS4 (5′-B TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG-3′), generating PCR fragments of approximately 700 bp. Here, A and B denote the two pyrosequencing primers, and MID denote the multiplexing barcode tags for post-sequencing reads. PCR reactions contained 1 × PCR reaction buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM dNTPs, 1 mM of each primer, 1 U Taq DNA recombinant polymerase (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shiga, Japan), and 2 μL DNA template, all in a final volume of 25 μL. Amplifications were conducted in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA), starting with an initial DNA denaturation step at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 27 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 58.3 C for 45 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final elongation at 72 °C for 7 min. The 18 tagged PCR products were purified using the MinElute PCR Purifi-cation Kit (Qiagen Gmbh, Hilden, Germany), separated by electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel in 1 × TAE and purified from the gel using the Qiagen QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen Gmbh, Germany). These cleaned PCR products were quantified on a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and pooled in equimolar concentrations to a final concentration of 10 ng μL−1. The product pool was sequenced on one quarter of a sequencing plate on a GS-FLX sequencer (454 Life Sciences) at Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Data were processed following the procedure described previously, using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline (Available online: http://qiime.sourceforge.net (accessed on 15 July 2025)). In brief, sequence reads with an average quality score of <25, read lengths of <200 bp after trimming the last 30 bps, ambiguous bases and homo-polymers of >7 bases were removed from the dataset. Sequences were clustered and assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the QIIME implementation of cd-hit with a threshold of 97% pairwise identity. The longest sequences of the 20 most abundant OTUs were extracted and taken as representatives for taxonomic identification by BLAST 2.2.26 searches against the non-redundant GenBank sequence database. Rarefaction analyses were performed using Analytic Rarefaction v.1.3 (Hunt Mountain Software 10.1, Athens, GA, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis in this study was performed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test differences among the four treatments (n = 3 for each treatment), with multiple comparisons performed using the least significant difference (Tukey HSD) test at a 95% confidence interval. Data normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Bartlett’s test prior to ANOVA. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationships between N2O emissions and the fungal genus. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the top 20 fungal genera (cumulatively accounting for 98% of sequences) to visualize differences in composition and structure of the fungal communities in different N treatments. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to examine correlations between fungal communities and environmental variables using CANOCO 5.0, with variable significance tested via Monte Carlo permutation (n = 499). Statistically significant differences were defined as having a p-value of 0.05 unless otherwise stated. To control for false positives arising from multiple testing when screening many taxa, we applied the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction to the p-values. Only correlations that remained significant after FDR correction were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of N Fertilization on Inorganic N Concentrations

Soil NH4+-N concentrations remained low (~6.74 mg·kg−1) across all treatments (Table 1). During the first seven days of incubation, no significant differences in NH4+-N levels were observed among treatments (Figure 1a). However, on days 9 and 12, NH4+-N concentration in N200 was significantly lower than that in the control (N0) (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the C/N ratio were observed among treatments (p > 0.05).
Soil NO3-N concentrations increased consistently with increasing N application (p < 0.05). On day 15, NO3-N concentrations in N100, N200, and N300 treatments reached 36.46, 38.22, and 41.65 mg·kg−1, respectively—approximately 1.4 to 1.6 times higher than that in the N0 treatment (Table 1). By the end of the incubation, NO3-N accumulation was higher in N200 than in N300 (Figure 1b).

3.2. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on N2O Emissions

On day 1, the N2O flux in N300 was significantly higher than in other treatments (p < 0.05), though not at peak levels. The highest daily N2O flux occurred on day 5 in N200 (10.29 μg·kg−1·d−1) and N300 (9.78 μg·kg−1·d−1), which were 1.6 and 1.5 times higher than in N0 (Figure 2a). Differences between N200 and N300 were not significant (p > 0.05), and N100 did not significantly differ from the control (p > 0.05). After day 7, fluxes stabilized, with no significant differences among treatments.
Cumulative N2O emissions over the 15-day period were significantly affected by N fertilization (Figure 2b). N200 yielded the highest cumulative emission (49.65 μg·kg−1), significantly exceeding all other treatments (p < 0.05) and 9% higher than N0. N300 also increased cumulative emissions relative to N0 (p < 0.05), whereas N100 showed no significant difference. Notably, more than 60% of total N2O emissions in N200 and N300 occurred within the first seven days, indicating a strong short-term stimulation of high N inputs.

3.3. Inhibitor-Sensitive Fraction of N2O Emissions

Biological inhibitors significantly reduced N2O emissions compared to the uninhibited control (p < 0.05). Specifically, emissions were reduced by 45.4% with fungal inhibition, 30.9% with bacterial inhibition, and 76.3% with combined inhibition, indicating active contributions from both groups. Emissions were significantly lower under fungal inhibition than under bacterial inhibition (p < 0.05), suggesting stronger fungal inhibitor-sensitive processes (Figure 3). These values were interpreted as inhibitor-sensitive fractions consistent with fungal or bacterial involvement, rather than absolute contributions at the taxonomic level.

3.4. Fungal Community Composition and Structure

A total of 491,602 high-quality fungal ITS sequences were obtained, clustering into 2698 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% similarity. The dominant phyla were Ascomycota (21.1–36.6%), Basidiomycota (6.7–10.1%), and Zygomycota (0.7–5.4%). Ascomycota abundance was highest in N200, whereas Basidiomycota was most abundant in N100 and least in N300 (Figure 4a). N fertilization significantly increased the relative abundance of Ascomycota while decreasing Basidiomycota.
At the genus level, Pyrenochaetopsis (2.1–10.8%), Chaetomium (1.0–7.0%), and Mortierella (0.7–4.3%) were dominant. Pyrenochaetopsis was significantly enriched in N200 (10.81%) compared with other treatments (p < 0.05) (Figure 4b). N fertilization also significantly increased the relative abundance of Pyrenochaetopsis, Penicillium, Talaromyces, Humicola, Guehomyces, and Thermomyces, while decreasing Chaetomium, Mortierella, Tuber, and Simplicillium.
Principal component analysis (PCA) of the top 20 genera showed clear separation among treatments, with the first two axes explained 85.44% of the total variation. Replicates within each fertilized treatment clustered tightly and were clearly separated from N0, indicating that N fertilization significantly altered fungal community structure (Figure 5).

3.5. Correlations Between N2O Emissions, Fungal Communities, and Soil Properties

Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that the first two axes explained 60.7% and 7.5% of the variation in fungal community composition at the phylum level (Figure 6a). N2O emissions were strongly and positively correlated with Ascomycota (R = 0.726, p = 0.008), whose abundance pattern across treatments mirrored the trend of N2O emissions.
At the genus level, RDA revealed that 73.2% of the variation in fungal community structure could be explained by the first two axes (46.6% and 26.6%) (Figure 6b). N2O emissions were positively correlated with Pyrenochaetopsis, Myrothecium, Zopfiella, Humicola, Bullera, and Conocybe. Among these, Pyrenochaetopsis, Myrothecium, and Humicola (all belonging to Ascomycota) showed significant positive correlations with N2O emissions based on correlation analyses: (1) Myrothecium (R2 = 0.556, p = 0.005); (2) Pyrenochaetopsis (R2 = 0.478, p = 0.013); (3) Humicola (R2 = 0.372, p = 0.035). In contrast, Cryptococcus showed a significant negative correlation (R2 = 0.551, p = 0.006) (Figure 7), while Zopfiella, Bullera, and Conocybe were not significantly correlated with emissions.
In addition, N2O emissions were positively correlated with soil NO3-N concentrations and negatively correlated with soil pH and NH4+-N (Figure 6). Among soil properties, pH exerted the strongest influence on fungal community structure, followed by NO3-N, NH4+-N, SOC, and TN. These shifts in soil chemical properties under N fertilization indirectly influenced fungal dynamics and N2O emissions.

4. Discussion

This study examined the effects of different N fertilization rates on N2O emissions and the contributions of fungi and bacteria in lawn soils. We further examined shifts in fungal community composition and their associations with N2O dynamics. Our results showed that N fertilization significantly stimulated N2O emissions (Figure 2b), in agreement with earlier reports reporting that exogenous N inputs enhance N2O fluxes across a range of ecosystems [35,36,37,38,39]. The emission factors (1.1–2.2%) observed here are compared to, or higher than, the IPCC Tier 1 default value of 1% of applied N [1]. This suggests that urban lawns may deviate from global defaults, emphasizing the need for regionally specific emission factors and further field-based measurements. It should be noted, however, that our data were derived from short-term, aerobic microcosm incubations using air-dried, rewetted soils. These conditions represent potential N2O production but do not account for plant uptake, root–microbe interactions, fluctuating redox states, soil structure, or gas diffusivity. Therefore, we refrain from extrapolating directly to field-scale emission budgets without additional validation.
The fungal inhibitor-sensitive fraction of N2O emissions (45.4%) was significantly higher than that of bacteria (30.9%) or other microbes (24%) (Figure 3), supporting the growing recognition of fungi as major contributors to soil N2O production, particularly under fertilized conditions. These values represent inhibitor-sensitive fractions rather than direct taxon-level flux partitioning; they should be interpreted cautiously given potential off-target effects of cycloheximide/streptomycin and the lack of independent confirmation (e.g., qPCR or plate counts). Similar fungal dominance has been reported in Tibetan grasslands [20,40], New Zealand pastures [41], and croplands and agroforestry systems in China [42,43], where fungal contributions range from 40% to >50%. The relatively greater fungal role may be linked to their ecological tolerance. In our study, N fertilization increased NO3-N concentrations while reducing soil pH (Table 1), conditions that likely suppressed bacterial ammonia oxidation but favored fungal activity. Thus, fertilized urban lawn soils may create microenvironments conducive to fungal-driven N2O production.
Interestingly, the highest N rate (N300) did not yield the highest N2O emissions. Instead, N200 produced the peak emission (Figure 2b), indicating a non-linear response. Several mechanisms may explain this pattern. Moderate N inputs may provide optimal substrate availability for fungal nitrification and denitrification without causing osmotic or pH stress [44]. By contrast, excessive N inputs (N300) may lead to acidification, accumulation of toxic intermediates, or altered microbial community composition that constrain N2O production [45,46]. In support, the relative abundance of Ascomycota was slightly lower under N300 than N200 (35.1% vs. 36.6%) (Figure 4a), paralleling the emission trend. These findings suggest that N2O emission potential depends not only on N inputs but also on microbial community structure and function, which may differ substantially across ecosystems.
Compared with croplands and natural grasslands, lawn soils are characterized by dense turf root mats, frequent irrigation, and anthropogenic soil compaction, all of which create microsites favorable to fungal processes. While bacterial dominance has been observed in intensively managed croplands in northern China [17], our results show a relatively greater fungal contribution, consistent with findings from other urban soils [18]. This contrast underscores the uniqueness of lawn ecosystems and the need to consider them separately in urban N2O inventories.
Ascomycota emerged as the dominant fungal phylum, showing a strong correlation with cumulative N2O emissions (R = 0.726, p = 0.008) and consistent patterns across treatments (Figure 6a). Previous studies indicated that over 90% of known N2O-producing fungi belong to Ascomycota, followed by Basidiomycota (7%) and Zygomycota (3%) [46,47]. At the genus level, Pyrenochaetopsis, Myrothecium, and Humicola were significantly enriched under N fertilization and positively correlated with N2O emissions (Figure 6b and Figure 7). Among these, Myrothecium showed the strongest association (R2 = 0.556, p = 0.005), consistent with earlier studies demonstrating its high N2O-producing capacity [45]. Its highest abundance in the N200 treatment further supports its role as a key fungal driver of lawn soil N2O emissions.
Temporal patterns of flux also aligned with microbial responses. Both N200 and N300 exhibited emission peaks on day 5 (Figure 2a), consistent with earlier reports reporting rapid N2O surges within days of fertilization [38,42,44]. More than 60% of cumulative emissions occurred in the first week, highlighting the short-term stimulatory effect of N addition [48]. Notably, the low-rate N100 treatment did not significantly increase emissions, likely due to rapid microbial immobilization, sorption, or limited transformations pathways under the incubation conditions [6,49].
From an ecological perspective, fungal dominance in N2O production carries trade-offs. Unlike bacteria, many fungal denitrifiers lack a functional N2O reductase, resulting in higher N2O:N2 ratios [15,41]. Thus, fungal dominance may increase net N2O emissions per unit nitrate reduced. Conversely, fungi also decompose complex organic matter, thereby influencing soil C cycling and CO2 fluxes [40]. Management strategies aiming to favor bacterial pathways with higher N2O reductase activity could mitigate emissions but may also alter C cycling and nutrient availability for lawn growth.
Our findings that fungal processes contributed more strongly to N2O emissions have practical implications: fungi and bacteria respond differently to environmental conditions such as pH, moisture, and soil amendments. Targeted management practices—such as soil pH adjustment, biochar application, or the use of nitrification inhibitors—could preferentially suppress fungal pathways and thereby reduce N2O emissions more effectively. For example, controlled-release fertilizers can regulate N supply and reduce post-fertilization peaks [27,44]. Biochar amendments may improve soil aeration, enhance nutrient retention, and lower substrate availability for N2O-producing microbes [12,48,49]. Soil pH adjustment can also influence microbial community composition, potentially favoring denitrifiers with higher N2O reductase activity [46]. While these strategies require testing under field conditions, they represent promising avenues for balancing turf quality and climate mitigation.
Taken together, our results underscore the central role of fungal pathways—especially Ascomycota genera such as Myrothecium, Pyrenochaetopsis, and Humicola—in shaping N2O emission from fertilized lawns. They provide a microbial-level explanation for the observed emission dynamics and suggest that sustainable N management must account for microbial responses, not only N application rates. Future studies incorporating functional gene quantification (amoA, nirK, nirS, nosZ, p450nor) will be valuable to directly link community structure to process pathways. Moreover, as our study focused solely on N2O, additional work is needed to include CO2 and CH4 to better capture the multi-gas contributions of lawns to urban greenhouse gas budgets.

5. Conclusions

Our incubation experiments demonstrate that N fertilization significantly stimulates soil N2O emissions in urban lawn soils. The N200 treatment produced the highest cumulative N2O emission, whereas further increase to N300 did not increase emissions, likely due to shifts in microbial community structure and soil chemistry. Biological inhibitor assays indicated that the inhibitor-sensitive fraction consistent with fungal contribution was 45% (inhibitor-sensitive estimate), with Ascomycota—particularly, Pyrenochaetopsis, Humicola, and Myrothecium—positively linked to these emissions.
These results suggest that moderate N fertilization (≤200 kg·ha−1·yr−1) can maximize fungal-driven N2O emissions in urban lawns. Sustainable N management should therefore consider fungal community responses. Promising approaches include lowering N rates, using controlled-release formulations, adjusting fertilization timing relative to irrigation, and applying soil amendments such as biochar or pH adjustments to reduce fungal-driven pathways. The finding that >60% of cumulative emissions occurred within 7 days of fertilization further highlights the importance of fertilizer timing and the potential of split applications to mitigate emission pulses.
Finally, because this study was based on short-term laboratory incubations and focused only on N2O, future field trials that include plant uptake, diurnal fluxes, and multi-gas (CO2, CH4) measurements are essential to scale results to urban lawn greenhouse gas budgets. Such work should also quantify the net climate impact of different management strategies while considering their implications for lawn health and nutrient runoff.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.X., M.Z., Y.W. and Z.Q.; methodology, Z.X., M.Z. and X.Z.; software, Z.X., M.Z., X.Z. and M.W.; validation, Z.X., M.Z., Y.L. and X.H.; formal analysis, Z.X., M.Z., Y.Z., Y.W. and Z.Q.; investigation, Z.X., M.Z., X.Z., M.W. and Y.L.; resources, Z.X., M.Z., X.H., Y.W. and Z.Q.; data curation, Z.X., M.Z., X.Z., M.W., Y.W. and Z.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.X. and M.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.X., M.Z., X.Z., M.W., Y.L., X.H., Y.Z., Y.W. and Z.Q.; visualization, Z.X. and M.Z.; supervision, Y.W. and Z.Q.; project administration, Z.X., M.Z., Y.W. and Z.Q.; funding acquisition, Z.X., M.Z., Y.W. and Z.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Yingkou Enterprise Doctor Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program (YKSCJH2023-019) (Z.X.), China North Modern Forestry Vocational Education Consortium Scientific Research Project (LZJB2024KY006) (Z.X.), College-level Key Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Agricultural Vocational and Technical College (LnzkA202312) (M.Z.), College-level Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Agricultural Vocational and Technical College (LnzkB202304) (Z.X.), Taishan Scholars Program (tsqn202211306) (Z.Q.), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2023YQ030) (Z.Q.), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2021195) (Z.Q.).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Feng Zhou, Chang Liu, and Dong Liu for their help with sample processing and laboratory analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. IPCC. Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kanter, D.; McDermid, S.; Nazarenko, L. Nitrous Oxide’s Ozone Destructiveness under Different Climate Scenarios. Proc. Int. Nitrogen Initiat. Conf. 2016, 2016, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, H.; Yan, Z.; Ju, X.; Song, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Zhu-Barker, X. Quantifying Nitrous Oxide Production Rates from Nitrification and Denitrification under Various Moisture Conditions in Agricultural Soils: Laboratory Study and Literature Synthesis. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1110151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cui, X.; Bo, Y.; Adalibieke, W.; Winiwarter, W.; Zhang, X.; Davidson, E.; Sun, Z.; Tian, H.; Smith, P.; Zhou, F. The Global Potential for Mitigating Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Croplands. One Earth 2024, 7, 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roothans, N.; Gabriëls, M.; Abeel, T.; Pabst, M.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Laureni, M. Aerobic Denitrification as an N2O Source from Microbial Communities. ISME J. 2024, 18, wrae116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Christensen, S.; Rousk, K. Global N2O Emissions from Our Planet: Which Fluxes Are Affected by Man, and Can We Reduce These? iScience 2024, 27, 109042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lin, Y.; Ding, W.; Liu, D.; He, T.; Yoo, G.; Yuan, J.; Chen, Z.; Fan, J. Wheat Straw-Derived Biochar Amendment Stimulated N2O Emissions from Rice Paddy Soils by Regulating the amoA Genes of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 113, 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ozlu, E.; Kumar, S. Response of Surface GHG Fluxes to Long-Term Manure and Inorganic Fertilizer Application in Corn–Soybean Rotation. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 626, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gu, X.; Wang, Y.; Laanbroek, H.J.; Xu, X.; Song, B.; Huo, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, L. Saturated N2O Emission Rates Occur above the Nitrogen Deposition Level Predicted for the Semi-Arid Grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China. Geoderma 2019, 341, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Weston, N.B.; Troy, C.; Kearns, P.J.; Bowen, J.L.; Porubsky, W.; Hyacinthe, C.; Meile, C.; Van Cappellen, P.; Joye, S.B. Physicochemical Perturbation Increases Nitrous Oxide Production from Denitrification in Soils and Sediments. Biogeosciences 2024, 21, 4837–4851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dhaliwal, J.K.; Panday, D.; Robertson, G.; Saha, D. Machine Learning Reveals Dynamic Controls of Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Diverse Long-term Cropping Systems. J. Environ. Qual. 2025, 54, 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qian, X.; Chen, H.; Li, Q.; Wang, F. Converse Responses of Biochar Application on N2O Emissions in Soils at Different pH Values in a Subtropical Citrus Orchard. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, C.; Han, X.; Ru, S.; Cardenas, L.M.; Rees, R.M.; Wu, D.; Wu, W.; Meng, F. Crop Straw Incorporation Interacts with N Fertilizer on N2O Emissions in an Intensively Cropped Farmland. Geoderma 2019, 341, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peng, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, J.; Bai, X.; Liu, X.; Ao, J.; Chang, R. Temporal-Scale-Dependent Mechanisms of Forest Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions under Nitrogen Addition. Commun. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, L.; Zhang, X.; Ju, X. Linkage between N2O Emission and Functional Gene Abundance in an Intensively Managed Calcareous Fluvo-Aquic Soil. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Müller, C.; Laughlin, R.J.; Spott, O.; Tobias-Rütting, T. Quantification of N2O Emission Pathways via a 15N Tracing Model. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 72, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abada, A.; Beiralas, R.; Narvaez, D.; Sperfeld, M.; Duchin-Rapp, Y.; Lipsman, V.; Yuda, L.; Cohen, B.; Carmieli, R.; Ben-Dor, S.; et al. Aerobic Bacteria Produce Nitric Oxide Via Denitrification and Promote Algal Population Collapse. ISME J. 2023, 17, 1167–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Laughlin, R.; Stevens, R. Evidence for fungal dominance of denitrification and co-denitrification in a grassland soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marusenko, Y.; Huber, D.; Hall, S. Fungi mediate nitrous oxide production but not ammonia oxidation in aridland soils of the southwestern US. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 63, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhong, L.; Wang, S.; Xu, X.; Wang, F.; Rui, Y.; Zhou, X.; Shen, Q.; Wang, J.; Jiang, L.; Luo, C.; et al. Fungi Regulate Response of N2O Production to Warming and Grazing in a Tibetan Grassland. Biogeosciences 2018, 15, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, L.; Li, S.; Shangguan, H.; Qiao, Z.; Huang, X.; Zhou, S.; Li, H.; Su, X.; Sun, X.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Diversity and Activity of Soil N2O-Reducing Bacteria Shaped by Urbanization Gradients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 15771–15782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, H.; Xia, Q.; Yang, T.; Bowman, D.; Shi, W. The Soil Microbial Community of Turf: Linear and Nonlinear Changes of Taxa and N-Cycling Gene Abundances over a Century-Long Turf Development. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 95, fiy224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, W.; Haver, D.; Pataki, D. Nitrogen budgets of urban lawns under three different management regimes in southern California. Biogeochemistry 2013, 121, 127–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. van Delden, L.; Rowlings, D.; Scheer, C.; Grace, P. Urbanisation-related land use change from forest and pasture into turf grass modifies soil nitrogen cycling and increases N2O emissions. Biogeosciences 2016, 13, 6095–6107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ignatieva, M. Lawns in Cities: From a Globalised Urban Green Space to Sustainable Nature-Based Solutions. Land 2020, 9, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Seto, K.C.; Güneralp, B.; Hutyra, L.R. Global Forecasts of Urban Expansion to 2030 and Direct Impacts on Biodiversity and Carbon Pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16083–16088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Trémeau, A.; Palviainen, M.; Fritze, H.; Pumpanen, J.; Heinonsalo, J. Lawns and Meadows in Urban Green Space: Greenhouse Gas Fluxes Linked to Plant Functional Types and Soil Properties. Biogeosciences 2024, 21, 949–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xun, Z.; Xu, T.; Ren, B.; Zhao, X.; Quan, Z.; Bai, L.; Fang, Y. Nitrogen fertilization of lawns enhanced soil nitrous oxide emissions by increasing autotrophic nitrification. Front. Env. Sci. 2022, 10, 943920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parkin, T.; Venterea, R.; Hargreaves, S. Calculating the detection limits of chamber-based soil greenhouse gas flux measurements. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Collier, S.; Ruark, M.; Oates, L.; Jokela, W.; Dell, C. Measurement of greenhouse gas flux from agricultural soils using static chambers. Jove-J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 90, 52110. [Google Scholar]
  31. Venterea, R.; Petersen, S.; de Klein, C.; Pedersen, A.; Noble, A.; Rees, R.; Gamble, J.; Parkin, T. Global Research Alliance N2O chamber methodology guidelines: Flux calculations. J. Environ. Qual. 2020, 49, 1141–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Weisblum, B.; Davies, J. Antibiotic inhibitors of the bacterial ribosome. Bacteriol. Rev. 1968, 32, 493–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Castaldi, S.; Smith, K. Effect of cycloheximide on N2O and NO3 production in a forest and an agricultural soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1998, 27, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, H.; Mothapo, N.; Shi, W. Fungal and bacterial N2O production regulated by soil amendments of simple and complex substrates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 84, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wrage, N.; Velthof, G.; Oenema, O.; Laanbroek, H. Acetylene and oxygen as inhibitors of nitrous oxide production in Nitrosomonas europaea and Nitrosospira briensis: A cautionary tale. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 47, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, J.; Han, X. N2O emission from the semi-arid ecosystem under mineral fertilizer (urea and superphosphate) and increased precipitation in northern China. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xue, D.; Gao, Y.; Yao, H.; Huang, C. Nitrification potentials of Chinese tea orchard soils and their adjacent wasteland and forest soils. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1225–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Duan, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, Z.; Xiong, Z. Field-aged biochar stimulated N2O production from greenhouse vegetable production soils by nitrification and denitrification. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 1303–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Braun, R.; Bremer, D. Nitrous Oxide Emissions in Turfgrass Systems: A Review. Agron. J. 2018, 110, 2222–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhong, L.; Bowatte, S.; Newton, P.; Hoogendoorn, C.; Luo, D. An increased ratio of fungi to bacteria indicates greater potential for N2O production in a grazed grassland exposed to elevated CO2. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 254, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rex, D.; Clough, T.; Richards, K.; Klein, C.; Morales, S.; Samad, M.; Grant, J.; Lanigan, G. Fungal and bacterial contributions to co-denitrification emissions of N2O and N2 following urea deposition to soil. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 2018, 110, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, Y.; Long, X.; Chapman, S.; Yao, H. Acidophilic denitrifiers dominate the N2O production in a 100-year-old tea orchard soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4173–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, H.; Mothapo, N.; Shi, W. The significant contribution of fungi to soil N2O production across diverse ecosystems. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2014, 73, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ma, L.; Shan, J.; Yan, X. Nitrite behavior accounts for the nitrous oxide peaks following fertilization in a fluvo-aquic soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2015, 51, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mothapo, N.; Chen, H.; Cubeta, M.; Grossman, J.; Fuller, F.; Shi, W. Phylogenetic, taxonomic and functional diversity of fungal denitrifiers and associated N2O production efficacy. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 83, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shoun, H.; Fushinobu, S.; Jiang, L.; Kim, S.; Wakagi, T. Fungal denitrification and nitric oxide reductase cytochrome P450nor. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2012, 367, 1186–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Prendergast-Miller, M.; Baggs, E.; Johnson, D. Nitrous oxide production by the ectomycorrhizal fungi Paxillus involutus and Tylospora fibrillosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011, 316, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Qian, H.; Yuan, Z.; Chen, N.; Zhu, X.; Huang, S.; Lu, C.; Liu, K.; Zhou, F.; Smith, P.; Tian, H.; et al. Legacy effects cause systematic underestimation of N2O emission factors. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jiang, C.; Yu, G.; Fang, H.; Cao, G.; Li, Y. Short-term effect of increasing nitrogen deposition on CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 2920–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dynamic variation of NH4+-N (a) and NO3-N (b) contents in lawn soils during a 15-day incubation. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among treatments (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Dynamic variation of NH4+-N (a) and NO3-N (b) contents in lawn soils during a 15-day incubation. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among treatments (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).
Nitrogen 06 00090 g001
Figure 2. Temporal variation of N2O flux (a) and cumulative N2O emissions (b) from lawn soils with or without urea over a 15-day incubation. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among treatments (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Temporal variation of N2O flux (a) and cumulative N2O emissions (b) from lawn soils with or without urea over a 15-day incubation. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among treatments (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).
Nitrogen 06 00090 g002
Figure 3. The fungal and bacterial inhibitor-sensitive fraction of N2O emissions in the lawn soil. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among treatments (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).
Figure 3. The fungal and bacterial inhibitor-sensitive fraction of N2O emissions in the lawn soil. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among treatments (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).
Nitrogen 06 00090 g003
Figure 4. Relative abundances of the main fungal phyla (a) and genus (b) in the lawn soil of all treatments. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3),Tukey HSD, p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Relative abundances of the main fungal phyla (a) and genus (b) in the lawn soil of all treatments. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 3),Tukey HSD, p < 0.05.
Nitrogen 06 00090 g004
Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCA) of fungal community structure in all treatments. The first two principal coordinate axes together explained 85.44% of the fungal variation. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the top 20 fungal genera (cumulatively accounting for 98% of sequences) to visualize differences in composition and structure of the fungal communities in different N treatments.
Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCA) of fungal community structure in all treatments. The first two principal coordinate axes together explained 85.44% of the fungal variation. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the top 20 fungal genera (cumulatively accounting for 98% of sequences) to visualize differences in composition and structure of the fungal communities in different N treatments.
Nitrogen 06 00090 g005
Figure 6. Correlations between N2O emission, soil properties and the community structure of fungal phyla (a) and genus (b) as determined by redundancy analysis (RDA).
Figure 6. Correlations between N2O emission, soil properties and the community structure of fungal phyla (a) and genus (b) as determined by redundancy analysis (RDA).
Nitrogen 06 00090 g006
Figure 7. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationships between N2O emission and the fungal genus in different N treatments (n = 12).
Figure 7. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationships between N2O emission and the fungal genus in different N treatments (n = 12).
Nitrogen 06 00090 g007
Table 1. Soil properties at 0–20 cm soil depth sampling (mean ± standard error, n = 3). Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among treatments (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).
Table 1. Soil properties at 0–20 cm soil depth sampling (mean ± standard error, n = 3). Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among treatments (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).
TreatmentSoil Organic C (g·kg−1)Total N
(g·kg−1)
C/N
Ratio
NH4+ Content
(mg·N·kg−1)
NO3 Content
(mg·N·kg−1)
pH
N07.33 ± 0.510.93 ± 0.107.95 ± 0.356.19 ± 0.2525.99 ± 2.14 b7.10 ± 0.02 a
N1007.42 ± 0.950.90 ± 0.068.21 ± 0.486.75 ± 0.1636.46 ± 1.70 ab7.01 ± 0.01 a
N2007.44 ± 0.220.89 ± 0.058.41 ± 0.247.55 ± 0.0838.22 ± 0.67 a6.83 ± 0.02 b
N3007.11 ± 0.300.93 ± 0.057.66 ± 0.256.51 ± 0.0841.65 ± 4.78 a6.73 ± 0.05 b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xun, Z.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, X.; Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Han, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Quan, Z. Role of Fungi in N2O Emissions from Nitrogen-Fertilized Lawn Soil. Nitrogen 2025, 6, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen6040090

AMA Style

Xun Z, Zhao M, Zhao X, Wang M, Liu Y, Han X, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Quan Z. Role of Fungi in N2O Emissions from Nitrogen-Fertilized Lawn Soil. Nitrogen. 2025; 6(4):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen6040090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xun, Zhifeng, Mingzhu Zhao, Xueya Zhao, Mi Wang, Yujing Liu, Xueying Han, Yiming Zhang, Yanhua Wu, and Zhi Quan. 2025. "Role of Fungi in N2O Emissions from Nitrogen-Fertilized Lawn Soil" Nitrogen 6, no. 4: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen6040090

APA Style

Xun, Z., Zhao, M., Zhao, X., Wang, M., Liu, Y., Han, X., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., & Quan, Z. (2025). Role of Fungi in N2O Emissions from Nitrogen-Fertilized Lawn Soil. Nitrogen, 6(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen6040090

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop