Next Article in Journal
Fractal, Scale Free Electromagnetic Resonance of a Single Brain Extracted Microtubule Nanowire, a Single Tubulin Protein and a Single Neuron
Previous Article in Journal
Homotopy Analysis Method to Solve Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Volterra-Fredholm Fuzzy Integral Equations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Generalized Integral Inequalities of Chebyshev Type

by
Paulo M. Guzmán
1,2,3,
Péter Kórus
4 and
Juan E. Nápoles Valdés
1,5,*
1
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes 3400, Argentina
2
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Resistencia, Chaco 3500, Argentina
3
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes 3400, Argentina
4
Department of Mathematics, Juhász Gyula Faculty of Education, University of Szeged, Hattyas utca 10, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
5
Facultad Regional Resistencia, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, French 414, Resistencia, Chaco 3500, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2020, 4(2), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract4020010
Submission received: 29 February 2020 / Revised: 25 March 2020 / Accepted: 27 March 2020 / Published: 2 April 2020

Abstract

:
In this paper, we present a number of Chebyshev type inequalities involving generalized integral operators, essentially motivated by the earlier works and their applications in diverse research subjects.

1. Introduction

Many integral inequalities of various types have been presented in the literature. Among them, we choose to recall the following Chebyshev inequality (see [1]):
1 b a a b f ( x ) g ( x ) d x 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x 1 b a a b g ( x ) d x ,
where f and g are two integrable and synchronous functions on [ a , b ] , a < b , a , b R . Here, two functions f and g are called synchronous on [ a , b ] if
( f ( x ) f ( y ) ) ( g ( x ) g ( y ) ) 0 ( x , y [ a , b ] ) .
In the case that we have f and g (or similarly f and g ) the sense of the previous inequality is the opposite.
Inequality (1) has many applications in diverse research subjects such as numerical quadrature, transform theory, probability, existence of solutions of differential equations and statistical problems. Many authors have investigated generalizations of the Chebyshev inequality (1), these are called Chebyshev type inequalities (see, e.g., [2,3] or [4]).
We give the definition of a general fractional integral. We assume that the reader is familiar with the classic definition of the Riemann integral, so we will not present it. Throughout the paper we will suppose that the positive integral operator kernel T : I ( 0 , ) defined below is an absolutely continuous function on interval I R .
Definition 1.
Let I be an interval I R and a , b I . The generalized integral operators J T , a + and J T , b , called respectively, right and left, are defined for every locally integrable function f on I as follows:
J T , a + ( f ) ( x ) = a x f ( t ) T ( t a ) d t , x > a .
J T , b ( f ) ( x ) = x b f ( t ) T ( b t ) d t , x < b .
Note that in special cases, J T , a + and J T , b are equal to the following integrals:
J T , 0 + ( f ) ( 1 ) = 0 1 f ( t ) T ( t ) d t
and
J T , 1 ( f ) ( 0 ) = 0 1 f ( t ) T ( 1 t ) d t = 0 1 f ( 1 t ) T ( t ) d t .
We say that f belongs to the function space L T + [ a , b ] if
J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) < ,
similarly f belongs to L T [ a , b ] if
J T , b ( f ) ( a ) < ,
and f L T [ a , b ] if f L T + [ a , b ] L T [ a , b ] .
It is easy to see that the case of the J T operators defined above contains, as particular cases, the integral operators obtained from conformable and non-conformable local derivatives. For details about the Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals (left-sided) of a function f of order α C with Re ( α ) > 0 the reader can consult [5,6]. In [7], Belarbi and Dahmani established some theorems related to the Chebyshev inequality involving Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operator. Recently, some new integral inequalities involving this fractional integral operator have appeared in the literature, see, e.g., [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Taking into account the previous research results and the generalized integral operator, we will obtain some Chebyshev type inequalities, which contain many of the inequalities reported in the literature as particular cases.

2. Main Results

Theorem 1.
Let f and g be two functions from L T + [ a , b ] which are synchronous on [ a , b ] . Then
J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b )
where
τ ( x ) = 0 x d s T ( s ) .
Proof. 
Since f and g are synchronous on [ a , b ] , we have
( f ( u ) f ( v ) ) ( g ( u ) g ( v ) ) 0 ; u , v [ a , b ]
or equivalently
f ( u ) g ( u ) + f ( v ) g ( v ) f ( u ) g ( v ) + f ( v ) g ( u ) .
Multiplying both sides by 1 T ( u a ) yields
f ( u ) g ( u ) T ( u a ) + f ( v ) g ( v ) T ( u a ) f ( u ) g ( v ) T ( u a ) + f ( v ) g ( u ) T ( u a ) .
Integrating both sides of the resulting inequality with respect to the variable u from a to b, gives us
a b f ( u ) g ( u ) T ( u a ) d u + a b f ( v ) g ( v ) T ( u a ) d u a b f ( v ) g ( u ) T ( u a ) d u + a b f ( u ) g ( v ) T ( u a ) d u .
From this, we have
J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) + f ( v ) g ( v ) τ ( b a ) g ( v ) J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) + f ( v ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) .
After multiplying the inequality by 1 T ( v a ) and integrating with respect to v between a and b, we get
J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) + τ ( b a ) a b f ( v ) g ( v ) T ( v a ) d v J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) a b g ( v ) T ( v a ) d v + J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) a b f ( v ) T ( v a ) d v ,
that is
2 J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 2 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b )
and we have got (2). □
Remark 1.
Similar calculations as above shows that for any f , g L T [ a , b ] synchronous on [ a , b ] , we have
J T , b ( f g ) ( a ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , b ( f ) ( a ) J T , b ( g ) ( a ) .
Remark 2.
If we take T 1 in Theorem 1 (or in Remark 1), then inequality (2) (or (4)) reduces to the classic inequality (1) of Chebyshev.
Remark 3.
If we consider the kernel ( α , β > 0 )
T ( x t ) = T ( x t , α , β ) = Γ ( β ) t 1 α α x α t α β 1 ,
we obtain ([16], Theorem 5) that contains ([7], Theorem 3.1) as a particular case.
Theorem 2.
Let f and g be two functions from L T 1 + [ a , b ] L T 2 + [ a , b ] which are synchronous on [ a , b ] . Then
τ 2 ( b a ) J T 1 , a + ( f g ) ( b ) + τ 1 ( b a ) J T 2 , a + ( f g ) ( b ) J T 1 , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T 2 , a + ( g ) ( b ) + J T 1 , a + ( g ) ( b ) J T 2 , a + ( f ) ( b ) .
where
τ 1 ( x ) = 0 x d s T 1 ( s ) and τ 2 ( x ) = 0 x d s T 2 ( s ) .
Proof. 
Writing T 1 in place of T and τ 1 in place of τ in (3) and then multiplying both sides by 1 T 2 ( v a ) yields
J T 1 , a + ( f g ) ( b ) T 2 ( v a ) + τ 1 ( b a ) f ( v ) g ( v ) T 2 ( v a ) J T 1 , a + ( f ) ( b ) g ( v ) T 2 ( v a ) + J T 1 , a + ( g ) ( b ) f ( v ) T 2 ( v a ) .
Integrating both sides of the resulting inequality with respect to the variable v between a and b gives us (6). □
Remark 4.
In case of T 1 = T 2 , we obtain Theorem 1.
Remark 5.
By taking the kernels ( α , β , τ > 0 )
T 1 ( x t ) = Γ ( β ) t 1 α α x α t α β 1 a n d T 2 ( x t ) = Γ ( β ) t 1 τ τ x τ t τ β 1 ,
we obtain ([16], Theorem 6) and hence ([7], Theorem 3.2) as a particular case.
Theorem 3.
Let f i i = 1 , 2 , , n be positive increasing functions from L T + [ a , b ] . We have
J T , a + i = 1 n f i ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 n i = 1 n J T , a + f i ( b ) .
Proof. 
We prove this theorem by induction on n N . For n = 1 , (7) trivially holds. For n = 2 , (7) immediately comes from (2), since f 1 and f 2 are synchronous on [ a , b ] . Now assume that the inequality (7) is true for some n N . Let f : = i = 1 n f i and g : = f n + 1 . Observe that f and g are increasing on [ a , b ] , therefore (2) and the induction hypothesis for n yields
J T , a + i = 1 n f i f n + 1 ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + i = 1 n f i ( b ) J T , a + ( f n + 1 ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) n i = 1 n + 1 J T , a + ( f i ) ( b ) .
This completes the induction and the proof. □
Remark 6.
Taking kernel (5), we obtain ([16], Theorem 7), which is a generalization of ([7], Theorem 3.3).
Theorem 4.
Let f , g : [ 0 , ) R , f , g L T + [ a , b ] such that f is increasing and g is differentiable with g bounded below by m = inf t [ 0 , ) g ( t ) . Then we have
J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) m τ ( b a ) J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) + m J T , a + ( t f ) ( b ) ,
where t ( x ) = x is the identity function.
Proof. 
Let p ( x ) = m x and h ( x ) = g ( x ) p ( x ) . Note that h is differentiable and increasing on [ 0 , ) . Hence we can apply (2), and we obtain
J T , a + ( f h ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( h ) ( b ) = τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( p ) ( b ) .
Since
J T , a + ( p ) ( b ) = m J T , a + ( t ) ( b )
and
J T , a + ( f p ) ( b ) = m J T , a + ( t f ) ( b ) ,
(8) implies
J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) = J T , a + ( f h ) ( b ) + J T , a + ( f p ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( p ) ( b ) + J T , a + ( f p ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) m τ ( b a ) J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) + m J T , a + ( t f ) ( b ) ,
where the desired result is obtained. □
Remark 7.
Using kernel (5), we obtain ([16], Theorem 8).
Remark 8.
Our results contain those of [20] with the right choice of kernel T.
Theorem 5.
Let f , g : [ 0 , ) R , f , g L T + [ a , b ] such that f and g are differentiable with f bounded below by m 1 = inf t [ 0 , ) f ( t ) and g bounded below by m 2 = inf t [ 0 , ) g ( t ) . Then we have
J T , a + ( h 1 h 2 ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) m 2 τ ( b a ) J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) m 1 τ ( b a ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) + m 1 m 2 τ ( b a ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) + m 2 J T , a + ( t f ) ( b ) + m 1 J T , a + ( t g ) ( b ) m 1 m 2 J T , a + t 2 ( b ) ,
where t ( x ) = x is the identity function.
Proof. 
Let p 1 ( x ) = m 1 x and h 1 ( x ) = f ( x ) p 1 ( x ) , similarly, p 2 ( x ) = m 2 x and h 2 ( x ) = g ( x ) p 2 ( x ) . Since h 1 and h 2 is differentiable and increasing on [ 0 , ) , applying (2) gives us
J T , a + ( h 1 h 2 ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( h 1 ) ( b ) J T , a + ( h 2 ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( p 1 ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) J T , a + ( p 2 ) ( b ) τ ( b a ) 1 J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) m 2 τ ( b a ) J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) m 1 τ ( b a ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) + m 1 m 2 τ ( b a ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) J T , a + ( t ) ( b ) .
Moreover,
J T , a + ( h 1 p 2 ) ( b ) = m 2 J T , a + ( t h 1 ) ( b ) = m 2 J T , a + ( t f ) ( b ) m 1 m 2 J T , a + t 2 ( b )
similarly,
J T , a + ( h 2 p 1 ) ( b ) = m 1 J T , a + ( t g ) ( b ) m 1 m 2 J T , a + t 2 ( b )
and
J T , a + ( p 1 p 2 ) ( b ) = m 1 m 2 J T , a + t 2 ( b ) .
From the equality
f g = ( h 1 + p 1 ) ( h 2 + p 2 ) = h 1 h 2 + h 1 p 2 + h 2 p 1 + p 1 p 2
we have
J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) = J T , a + ( h 1 h 2 ) ( b ) + J T , a + ( h 1 p 2 ) ( b ) + J T , a + ( h 2 p 1 ) ( b ) + J T , a + ( p 1 p 2 ) ( b ) ,
and this equality together with (9)–(12) implies the required result. □
Remark 9.
In case of m 1 = 0 , we obtain Theorem 4.
Remark 10.
The results obtained in this work can be extended if we consider instead of f and g, f and g or f and g , in the notion of synchronous functions, in which case the direction of the inequalities changes.

3. Conclusions

In this work, we have obtained the Chebyshev inequality from Theorem 1 within the framework of generalized integrals. In addition to the observations made, which prove the strength of our results, we would like to present a couple of variants of the classic Chebyshev inequality.
If we take kernel T = t α , α < 1 , then we get
J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) 1 α ( b a ) 1 α J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) .
In case of taking kernel T = e α t , α 0 , then we have the following variant of the Chebyshev inequality:
J T , a + ( f g ) ( b ) α 1 e α ( b a ) J T , a + ( f ) ( b ) J T , a + ( g ) ( b ) .

Author Contributions

P.M.G. and J.E.N.V. worked together in the initial formulation of the mathematical results. P.K. helped with additional mathematical content and presentation. All the authors provided critical work resulted in the final form of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Chebyshev, P.L. Sur les expressions approximatives des integrales definies par les autres prises entre les mêmes limites. Proc. Math. Soc. Charkov. 1882, 2, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. Özdemir, M.E.; Set, E.; Akdemir, A.O.; Sarikaya, M.Z. Some new Chebyshev type inequalities for functions whose derivatives belongs to Lp spaces. Afrika Mat. 2015, 26, 1609–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Set, E.; Choi, J.; Mumcu, İ. Chebyshev type inequalities involving generalized Katugampola fractional integral operators. Tamkang J. Math. 2019, 50, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Set, E.; Dahmani, Z.; Mumcu, İ. New extensions of Chebyshev type inequalities using generalized Katugampola integrals via Pólya–Szegö inequality. IJOCTA 2018, 8, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; North-Holland Mathematical Studies; Elsevier (North-Holland) Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
  6. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations. An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  7. Belarbi, S.; Dahmani, Z. On some new fractional integral inequalities. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2009, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, F. Extensions of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for convex functions via fractional integrals. J. Math. Inequal. 2016, 10, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Dahmani, Z. New inequalities in fractional integrals. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2010, 9, 493–497. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gorenflo, R.; Mainardi, F. Fractional Calculus: Integral and Differential Equations of Fractional Order; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 1997; pp. 223–276. [Google Scholar]
  11. İşcan, İ. Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for convex functions via fractional integrals. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math. 2015, 60, 355–366. [Google Scholar]
  12. Machado, J.T.; Kiryakova, V.; Mainardi, F. Recent history of fractional calculus. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011, 16, 1140–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Yaldiz, H.; Başak, N. Hermite–Hadamard’s inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57, 2403–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Set, E. New inequalities of Ostrowski type for mappings whose derivatives are s-convex in the second sense via fractional integrals. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 63, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Set, E.; İşcan, İ.; Zehir, F. On some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type involving harmonically convex functions via fractional integrals. Konuralp J. Math. 2015, 3, 42–55. [Google Scholar]
  16. Set, E.; Mumcu, İ.; Demirbaş, S. Conformable fractional integral inequalities of Chebyshev type. RACSAM 2019, 113, 2253–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, M.A.; Khan, T.U. Parameterized Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities For Fractional Integrals. Turkish J. Ineqal. 2017, 1, 26–37. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sarıkaya, M.Z.; Ertuğral, F. On the Generalized Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321760443 (accessed on 19 December 2019).
  19. Yaldız, H.; Akdemir, A.O. Katugampola Fractional Integrals within the Class of Convex Functions. Turk. J. Sci. 2018, 3, 40–50. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nisar, K.S.; Rahman, G.; Mehrez, K. Chebyshev type inequalities via generalized fractional conformable integrals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guzmán, P.M.; Kórus, P.; Nápoles Valdés, J.E. Generalized Integral Inequalities of Chebyshev Type. Fractal Fract. 2020, 4, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract4020010

AMA Style

Guzmán PM, Kórus P, Nápoles Valdés JE. Generalized Integral Inequalities of Chebyshev Type. Fractal and Fractional. 2020; 4(2):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract4020010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guzmán, Paulo M., Péter Kórus, and Juan E. Nápoles Valdés. 2020. "Generalized Integral Inequalities of Chebyshev Type" Fractal and Fractional 4, no. 2: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract4020010

APA Style

Guzmán, P. M., Kórus, P., & Nápoles Valdés, J. E. (2020). Generalized Integral Inequalities of Chebyshev Type. Fractal and Fractional, 4(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract4020010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop