You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
  • Editor’s Choice
  • Review
  • Open Access

26 February 2025

Cognitive Computing and Business Intelligence Applications in Accounting, Finance and Management

,
and
1
International Association of Engineers, Unit 1, 1/F, Hung To Road, Hong Kong
2
Conrad School of Entrepreneurship and Business, University of Waterloo, Engineering Bldg. 7, 2316, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
3
Centre for Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Innovation Village 10, Coventry CV1 2TL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Cognitive computing encompasses computing tools and methods that simulate and mimic the process of human thinking, without human supervision. Deep neural network architectures, natural language processing, big data tools, and self-learning tools based on pattern recognition have been widely deployed to solve highly complex problems. Business intelligence enhances collaboration among different organizational departments with data-driven conversations and provides an organization with meaningful data interpretation for making strategic decisions on time. Since the introduction of ChatGPT in November 2022, the tremendous impacts of using Large Language Models have been rippling through cognitive computing, business intelligence, and their applications in accounting, finance, and management. Unlike other recent reviews in related areas, this review focuses precisely on the cognitive computing perspective, with frontier applications in accounting, finance, and management. Some current limitations and future directions of cognitive computing are also discussed.

1. Introduction

Cognitive computing is an artificial intelligence (AI) subset that mimics human thought with computational algorithms and has the potential to address these issues and to drive automation in works requiring extensive knowledge []. AI is a branch of computer science that devises solutions in tasks involving learning and problem-solving, which are often associated with human intelligence []. Cognitive computing utilizes tools like deep learning and natural language processing (NLP) to simulate human brain functions []. Cognitive computing systems usually have the following four features: adaptability, interactivity, iterative questioning, and contextual ability []. This may match human cognition in terms of decision making with uncertain and incomplete information.
Nowadays, human cognition and cognitive functions like reasoning and problem-solving have been successfully replicated to some extent, even though, traditionally speaking, AI systems do not yet process human characteristics like self-awareness, social skills, and prompt adaptability. Complex heterogeneous datasets can be handled by deep learning algorithms to provide meaningful insights []. The cognitive computing system with adaptive learning and probabilistic reasoning capabilities can succeed in complex situations of high uncertainty and ambiguity. Schuetz and Venkatesh [] focused on discussing the traditional assumptions by information technology scientists on user–IT artifact interactions. Their system learns and then makes responses based on the changing environments. It can also interact with users conveniently. The system keeps trying to inquire, or look for extra information, until the task statement becomes clear enough. It is also able to read and process contextual elements. With these capabilities, cognitive computing systems can adapt to new circumstances, and perceive and interact with human beings. Renuga Devi et al. [] highlighted the insights and backbone of a cognitive system and its learning methods with some use cases. Singla [] presented a very brief overview of cognitive computing and its potential real-world applications.
With the introduction of generative pretrained transformers (GPT) in 2018 by OpenAI and the capabilities of the newly developed language models, the performance of cognitive computing tools for tasks, like text summarization and sentiment analysis, have been improving greatly. Generative AI (GenAI) models are AI tools that, based on existing data, are capable of creating new content. OpenAI’s GTI models (GPT-2 and GPT-3) are autoregressive in nature, through generating text based on prediction from the preceding words, while Google’s BERT is based on transformers, utilizing self-attention mechanisms for handling the dependencies among input data []. Zafar et al. [] focused on the conversational aspect of the AI system to provide human-like dynamics of interactions. Zafar et al. proposed LLMXplorer to review over 205 Large Language Models (LLMs) comprehensively, highlighting social and ethical concerns and their industrial applicability. Figure 1 shows the pipeline of Large Language Models.
Figure 1. Pipeline of Large Language Models.
Since the release of the first version of ChatGPT (OpenAI’s Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer) on 30 November 2022, the effects of ChatGPT have been rippling through the accounting industry, finance industry, and management. Its total number of users reached 100 million so quickly that ChatGPT was recognized as the fastest-growing application in Internet history. Because of this, Section 2 focuses on cognitive computing and business applications prior to the launch of ChatGPT, while the other sections focus mainly on cognitive computing applications after the launch of ChatGPT. Section 3 talks about current trends in cognitive computing and accounting. Section 4 focuses on current trends in cognitive computing and finance. Section 5 talks about current trends in cognitive computing and management. Section 6 provides insights on current limitations and future directions. Lastly, Section 7 is the conclusion.
The literature search was conducted on Scopus, an Elsevier database that only indexes peer-reviewed journals of high quality. The scope of the search is “Article title”, “Abstract”, and “Keywords”. For Section 2 on cognitive computing and business intelligence, the two keywords “cognitive computing” and “business intelligence” were used together. A total of six papers are listed, and the authors selected the relevant two papers that focused squarely on the business context with the applications of cognitive computing technologies. For Section 3 on cognitive computing and accounting, the two keywords “cognitive computing” and “accounting” were used together. A total of eight papers are listed, and the authors selected the relevant two papers that focused squarely on the accounting context with applications of cognitive computing technologies. These two papers were published before Nov. 2022. For Section 4 on cognitive computing and finance, the two keywords “cognitive computing” and “finance” were used together. A total of five papers are listed, and only two were published after Nov. 2022. For Section 5 on cognitive computing and management, the two keywords “cognitive computing” and “management” were used together. A total of fifty-seven papers are listed for the period from 2023 onwards. The authors selected the relevant ten papers on the business management context (excluding articles on data management, knowledge management, etc.) with applications of cognitive computing technologies. One of these ten papers has been included in the section on cognitive computing and finance as well. Because some researchers may not use the term “cognitive computing” in their articles on AI and business, additional papers have been carefully selected and added, based on the expertise of the authors. A summary of the articles on cognitive computing selected from the Scopus database is listed in Table 1, and the tree diagram for grouping the cognitive computing applications selected from Scopus is shown in Figure 2.
Table 1. Summary of the articles on cognitive computing selected from Scopus.
Figure 2. Tree diagram grouping the cognitive computing applications from Scopus [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,].
The main themes in our accounting section are accounting task automation [], augmented intelligence [], managerial accounting [], and job impact []. The main themes in our finance section are language translation [], invoice processing [], ERP workflow [], procure to pay [,], fraud detection [,], cyber-crime [,], transparency [], customer services [,], and process automation []. The main themes in the management section are entrepreneurial quality [], fraud detection [], risk management [,], cognitive risk context [], smart agriculture [], human resource management [], information processing [,,], predictive analytics [,,,], automated models [], facility management [], adaptive traffic control [], infrastructure management [], industrial maintenance management [], and business process management [].

2. Cognitive Computing and Business Intelligence Applications Before the Launch of ChatGPT

Unlike many other systems, cognitive computing is suitable for handling highly complex situations of multi-model data sources, given its interdisciplinary nature []. In many real-world business situations, the huge amount of data to process is beyond the capacity of human beings, or too time-consuming and expensive if handled by humans. For example, with the advance of the Internet and social networks, huge amounts of unstructured data of digital content like social media posts, images, audio and video clips, etc., have been generated. The cognitive computing approach is deployed for overcoming the complicated data corpus to generate actionable predictive results, by combining business intelligence with knowledge management for further competitive improvement for intellectual capital application []. With advances in deep neural network learning, cognitive computing has the capability to further improve the decision-making process that can mimic how the human brain operates increasingly well. Watson [] predicted that AI and cognitive computing will obtain dominant coverage in the next generation, as companies are implementing these innovations at an increasing rate. The key areas of interest involve NLP, vision systems, virtual reality, personal assistants, robotics, expert systems, and neural networks. Existing and future business intelligence software may deploy cognitive computing for forecasting model selection, natural language request processing, and visual display selection [].
On the other hand, business intelligence helps organizations make smart decisions in various fields and bring higher profit margins in return. The “intelligence” part is about the utilization of business knowledge to achieve profitable solutions []. This strategy for deploying next-generation decision support systems in business needs to combine traditional business intelligence (BI) with emerging but not yet fully mature cognitive computing approaches []. Traditional BI tools focus on handling structured data, while cognitive computing is useful in converting unstructured data into data understandable by the organization for its decision making. This combination strategy may have a lower risk of over-investments and thus lower cost, with satisfactory ROI. IBM, a leader in the cognitive movement, incorporated cognitive solutions into its strategy in 2014 [].
Business intelligence adoption is found to have significant positive impacts on key performance indicators (KPIs) like customer approval, cost reduction, and revenue increase in the quantitative study of Usman et al. []. BI can support continuous improvement in an organization with proactive feedback loops for measuring its KPIs and progress tracking towards its strategic objectives. It is noticed that there exists a strong relationship between business intelligence and knowledge management for obtaining competitive advantage. Competitive intelligence (CI) handles the strategic information of an organization for making decisions in four typical steps: collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination []. The deployment of BI and CI solutions can lead the organization to higher levels of customer satisfaction and profitability []. The gathering and analysis of information about competitors through CI may offer the organization a competitive advantage over its competitors [].
Cognitive computing has great potential to further improve decision support in business intelligence, as highlighted in the work of Williams [], by its ability to analyze vast types of data efficiently. It has been suggested that companies should apply business-driven opportunity analysis when comparing cognitive computing solutions, focusing on how to augment existing decision-support systems. Zhong and Sheng [] developed a cognitive computing model for better understanding of customer behavior and market strategy optimization for companies. The model is built with deep learning and NLP components to analyze customer sentiment for better demand forecasting. The experimental results support that its two components perform well and both sentiment analysis and forecasting for market strategy decision making achieve satisfactory accuracy. Nevertheless, as noted by Zhong and Sheng [], their system still faces limitations like generalization ability and interpretability. Models with more explanatory capabilities are needed to better understand the correlations between human emotions and needs in future work. With its natural language processing capability, cognitive computing is able to handle both structured and unstructured data []. A precondition for cognitive computing to become capable is the training process, which requires a huge amount of data. As an example in accounting applications, the large amount of accounting data for training the system may come from individual departments. The generalized connection between business processes and machine learning (ML) models is shown in Figure 3, based on the concept from [].
Figure 3. Generalized connection between business processes and machine learning models.
Guptaa et al. [] conducted a comprehensive survey of how to combine cognitive computing with big data. Cognitive computing features like observation, interpretation, evaluation, and decision fit well with the characteristics of big data, i.e., volume, variety, veracity, velocity, and value, the so-called five Vs. Successful deployments of cognitive computing techniques address many issues facing big data analytics, while big data analytics can lead organizations to get ahead in competition with other businesses []. The conclusion of the survey is that cognitive computing will be of increasing importance in its applications. Ranjan and Foropon [] outlined a framework for better addressing the current challenges for companies in utilizing big data methods for successful CI implementation.
Cognitive computing has great potential for enriching customer experiences with personal buying advice, based on its ability to learn from experience and to analyze huge datasets of consumer behavior. Cognitive computing improves customer–firm interaction and relationship building and assists organizations in decision making processes in the business world []. Marketing co-innovation is achieved with customer engagement and with cognitive computing algorithms to analyze the external data. Chen et al. [] focused on utilizing cognitive computing to generate marketing co-innovation from user unstructured data. Here, the cognitive computing models obtain valuable insights from vast unstructured external data. The proposed co-innovation process is achieved in the following three steps: idea generation, idea integration, and idea evaluation. The creation of innovation communities leads to more interactive engagement with customers [], while successful customer engagement is a key factor in providing competitive advantages [].
At the operational level of the retail industry, cognitive computing systems significantly reduce costs by reducing required human workloads with improved operational efficiency []. Nevertheless, there may be factors that hinder consumers’ readiness to adopt cognitive computing systems. Barbul et al. [] investigated the various perceptions of consumers of different genders about cognitive computing applications. It is noticed that women respondents have more concerns about the privacy of their personal information and about insufficient control over cognitive computing systems. It may be worth further investigating the perceptions of various consumer groups about different cognitive computing systems.
Giacobbe et al. [] outlined an approach that combined machine learning and business intelligence to raise the efficiency of IoT-as-a-Service (IoTaaS). Giacobbe et al. identified cognitive computing as one of the four pillars in the fourth industrial revolution. The role of machine learning is to enable the outlined approach to have the capability to learn from input data and to further improve its performance without need of explicit programming. The advantage of the system is that can it not only provide business insight service but also enrich the knowledge pool by linking with open data. Algorithm 1 and Figure 4 are simplified and modified versions of the approach outlined by Giacobbe et al. [].
Algorithm 1. Simplified version of data-oriented tasks of digital business platforms
1:  Data Inputs
2:  Data Collection
3:  Data Value Chain
4:        Data management and storage
5:        Data analysis
6:        Output by data analysis
7:        Machine learning
8:        Output by machine learning
9:  Business Intelligence
10:     Output by business intelligence
Figure 4. A simplified version of the data value chain for the platform of digital business technology.
Business intelligence software may be regarded as an integrated set of methods that transform business data into information to help business decision-making processes []. BI software conducts business monitoring and data analysis with reports, charts, and benchmarks while maintaining sufficient security and user interaction. As the cost of deploying cloud-hosted BI solutions has decreased to very affordable levels, BI applications have reached companies both large and small []. A typical BI application involves the following steps of data processing: Collect, Organize, Analyze, Share, and Control. Srivastava et al. [] presented a comprehensive review of 15 open-source BI software as follows, while comparing their BI features: Birst BI, Board BI, ClicData BI, Cluvio BI, Datapine, Dundas BI, Klipfolio, KyuBit BI, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Microstrategy analytics, SAP business objects BI, Sisense, Tableau, and Zoho analytics tools. The most recent BI trends on data automation, data quality management, Explainable AI, and data governance were also highlighted, while future features will focus on cognitive computing, NLP, etc.
Enterprise cognitive computing is helpful to business intelligence software and applications through implementing cognitive computing algorithms into the software that can facilitate organizational business processes []. As the volumes of data in enterprises have increased steadily in recent years, it has become more and more challenging for humans to handle. This is a clear opportunity for enterprise cognitive computing to extract meaningful insights from the vast amount of data, and to adapt to new data while maintaining consistency with historical data. Another advantage is that cognitive computing can automate many tasks that would otherwise need human interpretation. Tarafdar et al. [] presented a brief summary of the opportunities and challenges of enterprise cognitive computing, listing a number of successful business deployments of it. For example, call centre queries can now be handled by enterprise cognitive computing with suitable NLP capability. Tarafdar et al. also summarized the four main difficulties for business leaders to successfully deploy enterprise cognitive computing, i.e., deciding on the right tools, ensuring the suitability and accuracy of the data, supervising continuously, and clearly allocating responsibility between human users and the software.

6. Insights on Current Limitations and Future Directions

Understanding the limitations of Large Language Models is important to the successful deployment of LLMs [], despite the fact that hundreds of billions of dollars have been directed to the development of new applications based on the LLMs since the release of ChatGPT. Limitations on reasoning, expertise, understanding, and planning are highlighted. Because of these limitations, it is still essential to deploy LLMs with proper human supervision. Bai et al. [] found that, like human beings, the current LLMs are still subject to implicit biases. Stereotype biases by LLMs are observed in a diverse range of social classes. Thus, efforts are needed to reduce the effects from implicit biases in LLMs.
Another limitation to the cognitive computing and business applications is the slow adoption by SMEs of cognitive technologies, despite the fact that AI and cognitive computing technologies are very helpful in business applications. Powerful LLMs have been transforming businesses worldwide, especially among large corporations, as highlighted in the previous sections. Addressing slow adoption by SMEs is an especially important topic, given that the majority of businesses in our world are SMEs. For example, in Canada, the total number of employer businesses was 1.22 million in 2022, with 1.19 million small companies. In a recent survey by KPMG [], for the next three years, 55% of Canadian companies believe that AI/ML are the most important technologies for assisting them to achieve company goals. Nevertheless, it is also found out that only 5% of Canadian organizations are making progress on AI strategy concretely. A Deloitte survey [] noticed that 26% of Canadian companies had utilized at least one AI deployment, compared to the 34% average globally. Bryan et al. [] conducted further investigation on the data by Statistics Canada [] about how businesses in Canada had been utilizing AI over the past 12 months. Only 10.6% of the businesses were planning to utilize AI in their operations for producing goods or services in the coming 12 months. From the above official statistics and private surveys, it is observed that the SMEs are very slow in adopting and utilizing AI technologies.
A major reason for this slow adoption by SMEs of cognitive technologies is that many SMEs do not realize how AI and cognitive computing applications can help their businesses. Most SMEs have not utilized the benefits brought by the new AI technologies, due to the current limitations of the SMEs, like their AI knowledge and cost concerns. Even though nearly half of SME companies (46%) noted that emerging technologies like AI are of critical importance in the operations of their business, only 23% have had any kind of first-hand experience of deploying AI applications in the survey by Schönberger []. Tawil et al. [] conducted a three-year-long study on trends and challenges for more than 85 UK SMEs in adopting AI and big data technology with funding support from the European Regional Development Fund. It is noted that the SMEs can gain huge benefits with the adoption of data science (AI and big data), like productivity improvement, business growth, and innovation. Based on this three-year investigation, it is concluded with evidence that there exists the need to increase awareness among the SME stakeholders, like owners, entrepreneurs, and managers, about the advantages and challenges of the new digital technologies.
Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPTs), like other neural networks, have a weakness in their interpretability and are often criticized for their transparency issues, despite their outstanding capability []. Many of the artificial intelligence methods do not have the power to explain their own decision-making process, which may be called “Black-Box” []. This lack of explanation capability may lead to trust and compliance issues, and also hinder efforts to address the bias and fairness of AI methods. Adelakun et al. [] identified the lack of transparency and accountability in AI systems as the primary concern for its applications in accounting, because it is still difficult to understand and to explain AI’s outputs. Addressing the ethical issues associated with AI in accounting is an essential topic that needs handling to satisfy the ethics and governance requirements.
Explainable AI (XAI) has the potential to address the above interpretability weakness of the GPTs, leading to comprehension of the system’s process of decision making. Explainable AI refers to methods that enhance understanding of the AI outputs for human beings. The XAI has the potential to turn deep learning methods into more accessible and trustworthy models for applications. The challenges of existing XAI approaches include how to build up sound explanations for complex algorithms while also maintaining the balance between transparency and privacy. Hassija et al. [] presented a comprehensive review of the current XAI methods that are developed to provide interpretation to the black-box methods. To further strengthen the linguistic sophistication of the LLMs, Zafar et al. [] integrated knowledge graphs with LLMs. Their conversational AI system handles the weakness of many AI systems, i.e., transparency and trustworthiness, within the context of media and journalism. It is shown that the proposed system is able to serve as a precedent for a future AI system that should address not only efficiency but also trustworthiness.
Efforts are needed to understand the susceptibilities of LLMs to further improve LLMs with more reliable mechanisms, and to address the concerns of LLMs over safety, security, and privacy, as highlighted in the review of Zhang et al. []. Cartwright et al. [] investigated the privacy compliance of the popular ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. It was found that ChatGPT has issues like access control. On the other hand, Claude was found to exhibit satisfactory privacy compliance and data security. The performance of Gemini for these aspects was not consistent. Motlagh et al. [] highlighted the importance of defensive strategies in cybersecurity when deploying LLMs. At the organizational level, these involved four steps: identification, protection, detection, and response. As a result, sophisticated research and planning is needed to ensure that the LLMs are capable of satisfying privacy requirements.
Cognitive systems are desired to become a personalized business partner that has the capability of continuously learning. Continual learning, a paradigm of machine learning, is worthy of further investigation for business applications, as continual learning is developed to imitate the capability of human intelligence to learn continuously []. When ChatGPT was developed, it worked similarly to many other language models, by an autoregressive process for generating text []. In one sentence, the likelihood of the next word is derived from the previous words. It is interesting to note that this concept of autoregression and neural networks working together existed long before the launch of ChatGPT. The authors of [] showed that recurrent neural networks can be regarded as a type of nonlinear autoregressive-moving average model (NARMA). Baziyad et al. [] noticed that there existed linguistic limitations for this autoregression strategy of ChatGPT. New benchmarks need to be set up for cognitive computing systems to achieve human-centric intelligence [].

7. Conclusions

Our review of cognitive computing and business intelligence applications in accounting, finance, and management, three imperative areas for our society, provides a holistic framework to better comprehend their trends and limitations. In the two Forbes reports by Houston in March and December 2023 [,], it was emphasized that accounting is crucial to the successful operation of a business by providing essential financial information to management for key decision making. Furthermore, business finance is indispensable for the management of a business and requires key information from accounting.
Organizations may benefit from these frontier case studies of deploying cognitive computing in different business contexts under our integral schema. First, this review presented an overview of the trends for cognitive computing and business intelligence applications before the launch of ChatGPT. Next, this survey summarized more recent case studies of cognitive computing in accounting, finance, and management after the release of ChatGPT.
New initiatives from governments and organizations are needed to promote awareness in SME owners and managers of the benefits associated with cognitive computing technologies. As the complexity of the computing task increases with the size of data sources, it becomes challenging for small and medium enterprises to allocate enough financial support and resources for successful cognitive computing deployments. More institutional supports must be provided to SMEs for their successful implementation of cognitive computing solutions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-I.A.; formal analysis, S.-I.A.; investigation, S.-I.A.; methodology, S.-I.A., M.H. and V.P.; writing, S.-I.A., M.H. and V.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The author S.-I.A. would like to acknowledge the very helpful feedback and comments given by Kai Wai Hui, The University of Hong Kong, during the drafting of the manuscript. The author S.-I.A. would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Seohee Yoon and Amy Huan Wang of the University of Waterloo for proofreading the English in the revised version. Both Seohee and Amy are native English speakers. The authors would like to thank the reviewers sincerely for their very helpful comments and advice in the reviewer reports, thanks to which the authors have further improved the draft.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sreedevi, A.G.; Nitya Harshitha, T.; Sugumaran, V.; Shankar, P. Application of cognitive computing in healthcare, cybersecurity, big data and IoT: A literature review. Inf. Process. Manag. 2022, 59, 102888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heji, A.E.; Alansari, O.E.; Al-Sartawi, A. Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Accounting Systems. In Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Society 5.0; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 363–376. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wu, K. Creating panoramic images using ORB feature detection and RANSAC-based image alignment. Adv. Comput. Commun. 2023, 4, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schuetz, S.; Venkatesh, V. The Rise of Human Machines: How Cognitive Computing Systems Challenge Assumptions of User-System Interaction. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2020, 21, 460–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, K.; Chi, K. Enhanced E-commerce Customer Engagement: A Comprehensive Three-Tiered Recommendation System. J. Knowl. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2024, 2, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Renuga Devi, T.; Muthutaa, K.; Sujatha, M.; Ezhilarasie, R. Cognitive Analytics in Continual Learning: A new Frontier in Machine Learning Research. In Cognitive Analytics and Reinforcement Learning; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singla, A. Cognitive Computing: Emulating Human Intelligence in AI Systems. J. Artif. Intell. Gen. Sci. 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Devlin, J.; Chang, M.W.; Lee, K.; Toutanova, K. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1810.04805. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zafar, A.; Parthasarathy, V.B.; Van, C.L.; Shahid, S.; Khan, A.I.; Shahid, A. Building Trust in Conversational AI: A Review and Solution Architecture Using Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2024, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, R. Machine Learning and Cognition in Enterprises; Apress: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. Giacobbe, M.; Xibilia, M.G.; Puliafito, A. Building a Digital Business Technology Platform in the Industry 4.0 Era. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Smart Innovation, Ergonomics and Applied Human Factors (SEAHF), Madrid, Spain, 22–24 January 2019; Benavente-Peces, C., Slama, S., Zafar, B., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marshall, T.E.; Lambert, S.L. Cloud-Based Intelligent Accounting Applications: Accounting Task Automation Using IBM Watson Cognitive Computing. J. Emerg. Technol. Account. 2018, 15, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pilipczuk, O. Toward Cognitive Management Accounting. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Y.; Muthiah, M.; Routh, A.; Dorai, C. Cognitive Computing in Action to Enhance Invoice Processing with Customized Language Translation. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Computing (ICCC), Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 June 2017; pp. 136–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ryman-Tubb, N.F.; Krause, P.; Garn, W. How Artificial Intelligence and machine learning research impacts payment card fraud detection: A survey and industry benchmark. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2018, 76, 130–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, L.; Ismagilova, E.; Aarts, G.; Coombs, C.; Crick, T.; Duan, Y.; Dwivedi, R.; Edwards, J.; Eirug, A.; et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 57, 101994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Faccia, A. National Payment Switches and the Power of Cognitive Computing against Fintech Fraud. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2023, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deborah, R.N.; Rajiv, S.A.; Vinora, A.; Sivakarthi, G. Hyperautomation for Automating the Customer Service Operations. In Hyperautomation for Next-Generation Industries; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 207–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Gong, Z.; Hao, Z.; Xu, J. A Cognitive Uncertainty Calculation Method Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set and Applications in Geopolitical Risk Assessment. Cogn Comput. 2023, 15, 1988–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yabanci, O. Advanced technology in modern SMEs: The intelligent HRM perspective. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Dev. Manag. 2023, 23, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gupta, S.; Modgil, S.; Wong, C.W.Y.; Kar, A.K. The role of innovation ambidexterity on the relationship between cognitive computing capabilities and entrepreneurial quality: A comparative study of India and China. Technovation 2023, 127, 102835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muthukaruppasamy, S.; Arun Sampaul Thomas, G.; Nandha Gopal, J.; Ravindra, S.; Saravanan, K. Broad Framework of Digital Twins in Agricultural Domain. In Predictive Analytics in Smart Agriculture; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 213–227. [Google Scholar]
  23. Murthi, P.; Chavhan, J.J.; Sarkar, R.; Khandelwal, K.; Chandini, S.; Dhanraj, J.A. Cognitive Computing for Smart City Infrastructure Management. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI), Chennai, India, 9–10 May 2024; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sudhakar, A.V.V.; Tyagi, A.; Patil, P.S.; Kumar, K.S.; Sathe, M.; Geetha, B.T. Cognitive Computing in Intelligent Traffic Management Systems. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI), Chennai, India, 9–10 May 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kans, M. Are We There Yet?—Looking at the Progress of Digitalization in Maintenance Based on Interview Studies Within the Swedish Maintenance Ecosystem. In International Congress and Workshop on Industrial AI and eMaintenance 2023; Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Kumar, U., Karim, R., Galar, D., Kour, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nowak-Nova, D. Cognitive Automation of Real Property Management Processes. Forum Sci. Oeconomia 2024, 12, 118–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hildebrand, D.; Rösl, S.; Auer, T.; Schieder, C. Next-Generation Business Process Management (BPM): A Systematic Literature Review of Cognitive Computing and Improvements in BPM. In Subject-Oriented Business Process Management. Models for Designing Digital Transformations; S-BPM ONE 2024; Elstermann, M., Lederer, M., Eds.; Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; Volume 2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Surbakti, H.; Azman Ta’a, A. Managing Knowledge Business Intelligence: A Cognitive Analytic Approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Science and Technology 2017 (ICAST’17), Kedah, Malaysia, 3–5 April 2017; Volume 1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Watson, H. The Cognitive Decision-Support Generation. Bus. Intell. J. 2017, 22, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  30. Srivastava, G.; Muneeswari, S.; Venkataraman, R.; Kavitha, V.; Parthiban, N. A review of the state of the art in business intelligence software. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2022, 16, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Williams, S. Outthink Cognitive Hype: Creating a Business-Driven Cognitive Strategy. Bus. Intell. J. 2016, 21, 28–36. [Google Scholar]
  32. Usman, M.; Moinuddin, M.; Khan, R. Unlocking Insights: Harnessing the Power of Business Intelligence for Strategic Growth. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Innov. 2024, 1, 97–117. [Google Scholar]
  33. Acharya, A.; Singh, S.K.; Pereira, V.; Singh, P. Big Data, knowledge co-creation and decision-making in fashion industry. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 42, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Olszak, C.M. An overview of information tools and technologies for competitive intelligence building: Theoretical approach. Issues Informing Sci. Inf. Technol. 2024, 11, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kamboj, S.; Sarmah, B.; Gupta, S.; Dwivedi, Y. Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: Applying the paradigm of Stimulus-Organism-Response. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhong, X.; Sheng, F. Customer Sentiment and Demand Prediction Model Based on Cognitive Computing. In Disruptive Human Resource Management; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  37. Guptaa, S.; Karb, A.K.; Baabdullahc, A.; Al-Khowaiter, W.A.A. Big data with cognitive computing: A review for the future. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 42, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bumblauskas, D.; Nold, H.; Bumblauskas, P.; Igou, A. Big data analytics: Transforming data to action. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2017, 23, 703–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ranjan, J.; Foropon, C. Big Data Analytics in Building the Competitive Intelligence of Organizations. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 56, 102231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Changchit, C.; Chuchuen, C. Cloud computing: An examination of factors impacting users’ adoption. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2018, 58, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, S.; Kang, J.; Liu, S.; Sun, Y. Cognitive computing on unstructured data for customer co-innovation. Eur. J. Mark. 2020, 54, 570–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zahay, D.; Hajli, N.; Sihi, D. Managerial perspectives on crowdsourcing in the new product development process. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2018, 71, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Navimipour, N.J.; Zareie, B. A model for assessing the impact of e-learning systems on employees’ satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 53, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. West, A.; Clifford, J.; Atkinson, D. “Alexa, Build me a Brand”—An Investigation into the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Branding. Bus. Manag. Rev. 2018, 9, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barbul, M.; Pelau, C.; Pop, S. Genders’ Fascinations and Fears Towards the Use of Cognitive Computing. In Proceedings of the BASIQ 2022 International Conference on New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption, Graz, Austria, 25–27 May 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bahrami, M.; Arabzad, S.M.; Mazaher, G. Innovation in Market Management by Utilizing Business Intelligence: Introducing Proposed Framework. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 41, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sun, Z.; Sun, L.; Strang, K.D. Big Data Analytics Services for Enhancing Business Intelligence. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2018, 58, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tarafdar, M.; Beath, C.M.; Ross, J.W. Enterprise Cognitive Computing Applications: Opportunities and Challenges. IT Prof. 2017, 19, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Johnson, J. How AI and Automation Technology Can Help Accountants. 2023. Available online: https://www.business.com/articles/ai-and-accounting/ (accessed on 19 October 2024).
  50. Abdallah, M.; Salah, M. Artificial intelligence and intellectual properties: Legal and ethical considerations. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng. 2024, 12, 368–376. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sanad, Z.; Al-Sartawi, A. Financial statements fraud and data mining: A review. In Artificial Intelligence Systems and the Internet of Things in the Digital Era; Musleh Al-Sartawi, A.M., Razzaque, A., Kamal, M.M., Eds.; EAMMIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; Volume 239. [Google Scholar]
  52. Saleem, I.; Abdeljawad, I.; Nour, A.I. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Accounting Profession: Implications and Challenges. In Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Society 5.0; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 327–336. [Google Scholar]
  53. KPMG International Limited. Our New Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) Reporting Tool. 2017. Available online: https://home.kpmg (accessed on 31 December 2017).
  54. Brownlee, M. Big 4 Firm Unveils New FBT, Payroll Tax Tools. Accountantsdaily. 2018. Available online: https://www.accountantsdaily.com.au/technology/11688-big-four-firm-unveils-new-fbt-payroll-tax-tools (accessed on 31 December 2018).
  55. Jejeniwa, T.O.; Mhlongo, N.Z.; Jejeniwa, T.O. A comprehensive review of the impact of artificial intelligence on modern accounting practices and financial reporting. Comput. Sci. IT Res. J. 2024, 5, 1031–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Himeur, Y.; Elnour, M.; Fadli, F.; Meskin, N.; Petri, I.; Rezgui, Y.; Bensaali, F.; Amira, A. AI-big data analytics for building automation and management systems: A survey, actual challenges and future perspectives. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023, 56, 4929–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Goh, C.; Pan, G.; Seow, P.S.; LEE, B.H.Z.; Yong, M. Charting the Future of Accountancy with AI. Research Collection School of Accountancy. 2019. Available online: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1806 (accessed on 31 December 2019).
  58. Fotoh, L.E.; Lorentzon, J.I. Audit digitalization and its consequences on the audit expectation gap: A critical perspective. Account. Horiz. 2023, 37, 43–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Adelakun, B.O.; Majekodunmi, T.G.; Akintoye, O.S. AI and ethical accounting: Navigating challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Adv. Econ. 2024, 6, 224–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lewis, C.; Young, S. Fad or future? Automated analysis of financial text and its implications for corporate reporting. Account. Bus. Res. 2019, 49, 587–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Firoozi, A.A.; Firoozi, A.A. Application of machine learning in geotechnical engineering for risk assessment. In Machine Learning and Data Mining Annual; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2023; Volume 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Budhwar, P.; Chowdhury, S.; Wood, G.; Aguinis, H.; Bamber, G.J.; Beltran, J.R.; Boselie, P.; Cooke, F.L.; Decker, S.; DeNisi, A.; et al. Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2023, 33, 606–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Biancone, P.; Chmet, F. Role of ChatGPT in the Accounting Field. In Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions; De Bem Machado, A., Sousa, M.J., Dal Mas, F., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., Eds.; EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fu, X.; Yang, L.; Song, Y.; Yang, C. Exploration on the Application of ChatGPT in Corporate Financial Management. Acad. J. Manag. Soc. Sci. 2024, 7, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Eulerich, M.; Sanatizadeh, A.; Vakilzadeh, H.; Wood, D.A. Is it all hype? ChatGPT’s performance and disruptive potential in the accounting and auditing industries. Rev. Account. Stud. 2024, 29, 2318–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shchyrba, I.; Savitskaya, M.; Fursa, T.; Yeremian, O.; Ostropolska, Y. Management accounting: The latest technologies, ChatGPT capabilities. Financ. Credit. Act. Probl. Theory Pract. 2024, 1, 160. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhao, J.; Wang, X. Unleashing efficiency and insights: Exploring the potential applications and challenges of ChatGPT in accounting. J. Corp. Account. Financ. 2024, 35, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, H.; Vasarhelyi, M.A. Applying Large Language Models in Accounting: A Comparative Analysis of Different Methodologies and Off-the-Shelf Examples. J. Emerg. Technol. Account. 2024, 21, 133–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, A.G.; Muhn, M.; Nikolaev, V.V. Financial Statement Analysis with Large Language Models; Chicago Booth Research Paper 2024, Fama-Miller Working Paper NO. 2024-65. Available online: https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/BFI_WP_2024-65.pdf (accessed on 30 November 2024).
  70. Rane, N.; Choudhary, S.; Rane, J. Gemini or ChatGPT? Efficiency, Performance, and Adaptability of Cutting-Edge Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Finance and Accounting. SSRN 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Anica-Popa, I.-F.; Vrîncianu, M.; Anica-Popa, L.-E.; Cișmașu, I.-D.; Tudor, C.-G. Framework for Integrating Generative AI in Developing Competencies for Accounting and Audit Professionals. Electronics 2024, 13, 2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Richardson, B.; Gilbert, J.E. A framework for fairness: A systematic review of existing fair AI solutions. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2112.05700. [Google Scholar]
  73. Vasarhelyi, M.A.; Moffitt, K.C.; Stewart, T.; Sunderland, D. Large Language Models: An Emerging Technology in Accounting. J. Emerg. Technol. Account. 2023, 20, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Korzynski, P.; Mazurek, G.; Altmann, A.; Ejdys, J.; Kazlauskaite, R.; Paliszkiewicz, J.; Wach, K.; Ziemba, E. Generative Artificial Intelligence as a New Context for Management Theories: Analysis of ChatGPT. Cent. Eur. Manag. J. 2023, 31, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Schwartz, R.; Vassilev, A.; Greene, K.; Perine, L.; Burt, A.; Hall, P. Towards a Standard for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence; Special Publication (NIST SP); National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhu, C.; Guan, Y. The Risks and Countermeasures of Accounting Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Electronic Communication and Artificial Intelligence (IWECAI), Zhuhai, China, 14–16 January 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 358–361. [Google Scholar]
  77. Kirk, H.; Jun, Y.; Iqbal, H.; Benussi, E.; Volpin, F.; Dreyer, F.A.; Shtedritski, A.; Asano, Y.M. Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Models. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2102.04130. [Google Scholar]
  78. Boomer, J. Cognitive Computing and the Future of the Accounting Profession. CPA Practice Advisor. 19 April 2017. Available online: https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2017/04/19/cognitive-computing-and-the-future-of-the-accounting-profession/25053/ (accessed on 19 April 2017).
  79. Davenport, T.H.; Kirby, J. Only Humans Need Apply: Winners and Losers in the Age of Smart Machines; Harper Business: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  80. Han, H.; Shiwakoti, R.K.; Jarvis, R.; Mordi, C.; Botchie, D. Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial Intelligence: A literature review. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2023, 48, 100598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Anomah, S.; Ayeboafo, B.; Owusu, A.; Aduamoah, M. Adapting to AI: Exploring the implications of AI integration in shaping the accounting and auditing profession for developing economies. EDPACS 2024, 69, 28–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Monteiro, A.; Cepêda, C.; Da Silva, A.C.F.; Vale, J. The Relationship between AI Adoption Intensity and Internal Control System and Accounting Information Quality. Systems 2023, 11, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ao, S.-I.; Gelman, L.; Karimi, H.R.; Tiboni, M. Advances in Machine Learning for Sensing and Condition Monitoring. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 12392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chen, J. The Augmenting Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Marketing Performance. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA, 1 January 2019. Available online: https://scholarworks.utep.edu/open_etd/1976 (accessed on 31 December 2019).
  85. Adeyelu, O.O.; Ugochukwu, C.E.; Shonibare, M.A. The impact of artificial intelligence on accounting practices: Advancements, challenges, and opportunities. Int. J. Manag. Entrep. Res. 2024, 6, 1200–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H. The impact of artificial intelligence on employment in the accounting profession: A contingency perspective. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2020, 37, 100449. [Google Scholar]
  87. Marrone, M.; Hazelton, J. The disruptive and transformative potential of new technologies for accounting, accountants and accountability. Meditari Account. Res. 2019, 27, 677–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Efrim Boritz, J.; Stratopoulos, T.C. AI and the Accounting Profession: Views from Industry and Academia. J. Inf. Syst. 2023, 37, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bahoo, S.; Cucculelli, M.; Goga, X.; Mondolo, J. Artificial intelligence in Finance: A comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis. SN Bus. Econ. 2024, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kearns, J. AI’s Reverberations Across Finance. Finance & Development Magazine. IMF. December 2023. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2023/12/AI-reverberations-across-finance-Kearns (accessed on 31 December 2023).
  91. Ali, H.; Aysan, A.F. What will ChatGPT revolutionize in the financial industry? Mod. Financ. 2023, 1, 116–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dowling, M.; Lucey, B. ChatGPT for (finance) research: The Bananarama conjecture. Financ. Res. Lett. 2023, 53, 103662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Khan, M.S.; Umer, H. ChatGPT in finance: Applications, challenges, and solutions. Heliyon 2024, 10, e24890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zaremba, A.; Demir, E. ChatGPT: Unlocking the future of NLP in finance. Mod. Financ. 2023, 1, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lee, J.; Stevens, N.; Han, S.C.; Song, M. A Survey of Large Language Models in Finance (FinLLMs). arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.02315. [Google Scholar]
  96. Liu, Z.; Huang, D.; Huang, K.; Li, Z.; Zhao, J. Finbert: A pre-trained financial language representation model for financial text mining. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Yokohama, Japan, 7–15 January 2021; pp. 4513–4519. [Google Scholar]
  97. Shah, R.; Chawla, K.; Eidnani, D.; Shah, A.; Du, W.; Chava, S.; Raman, N.; Smiley, C.; Chen, J.; Yang, D. When flue meets flang: Benchmarks and large pretrained language model for financial domain. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 7–11 December 2022; pp. 2322–2335. [Google Scholar]
  98. Xie, Q.; Han, W.; Zhang, X.; Lai, Y.; Peng, M.; Lopez-Lira, A.; Huang, J. Pixiu: A large language model, instruction data and evaluation benchmark for finance. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, 10–16 December 2023. [Google Scholar]
  99. Wu, S.; Irsoy, O.; Lu, S.; Dabravolski, V.; Dredze, M.; Gehrmann, S.; Kambadur, P.; Rosenberg, D.; Mann, G. Bloomberggpt: A large language model for finance. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.17564. [Google Scholar]
  100. Chlouverakis, K. How Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping the Financial Services Industry. EY CESA Financial Services. 26 April 2024. Available online: https://www.ey.com/en_gr/financial-services/how-artificial-intelligence-is-reshaping-the-financial-services-industry (accessed on 30 November 2024).
  101. Shabsigh, G.; Boukherouaa, E.B. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Finance: Risk Considerations. Fintech Notes No 2023/006. International Monetary Fund. 22 August 2023. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fintech-notes/Issues/2023/08/18/Generative-Artificial-Intelligence-in-Finance-Risk-Considerations-537570 (accessed on 31 December 2023).
  102. Mohammed, A.B.; Al-Okaily, M.; Qasim, D. Mohammad Khalaf Al-Majali. Towards an understanding of business intelligence and analytics usage: Evidence from the banking industry. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2024, 4, 100215. [Google Scholar]
  103. Hmoud, H.; Al-Adwan, A.S.; Horani, O.; Yaseen, H.; Al Zoubi, J.Z. Factors influencing business intelligence adoption by higher education institutions. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Montes de Oca Munguia, O.; Pannell, D.J.; Llewellyn, R. Understanding the adoption of innovations in agriculture: A review of selected conceptual models. Agronomy 2021, 11, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chi, K.; Ness, S.; Muhammad, T.; Pulicharla, M.R. Addressing Challenges, Exploring Techniques, and Seizing Opportunities for AI in Finance. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2024, 9, 8. [Google Scholar]
  106. Sobhanmanesh, F.; Beheshti, A.; Nouri, N.; Chapparo, N.M.; Raj, S.; George, R.A. A Cognitive Model for Technology Adoption. Algorithms 2023, 16, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bormpotsis, C.; Sedky, M.; Patel, A. Predicting Forex Currency Fluctuations Using a Novel Bio-Inspired Modular Neural Network. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2023, 7, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yang, Q.; Lee, Y.-C. Ethical AI in Financial Inclusion: The Role of Algorithmic Fairness on User Satisfaction and Recommendation. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2024, 8, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Werz, J.M.; Borowski, E.; Isenhardt, I. Explainability as a Means for Transparency? Lay Users’ Requirements Towards Transparent AI. Cogn. Comput. Internet Things 2024, 124, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Linkon, A.A.; Shaima, M.; Sarker, M.S.; Badruddowza, B.; Nabi, N.; Rana, M.N.; Ghosh, S.K.; Rahman, M.A.; Esa, H.; Chowdhury, F.R. Advancements and Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models on Business Management: A Comprehensive Review. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Stud. 2024, 6, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sutrisno; Suherlan; Rijal, S. The Role of ChatGPT in Enhancing the Quality of Human Resource Team Communication: An Innovative Approach in Human Resource Management. J. Contemp. Adm. Manag. 2024, 2, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Al Haj Ali, J.; Gaffinet, B.; Panetto, H.; Naudet, Y. Cognitive systems and interoperability in the enterprise: A systematic literature review. Annu. Rev. Control. 2024, 57, 100954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Desai, M.A. What the Finance Industry Tells Us About the Future of AI. Harvard Business Review. 9 August 2023. Available online: https://hbr.org/2023/08/what-the-finance-industry-tells-us-about-the-future-of-ai (accessed on 31 December 2023).
  114. Maas, K.; Schaltegger, S.; Crutzen, N. Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 136, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Almulla, D.; Abbas, M.; Al-Alawi, A.; Alkooheji, L. Process and Impact Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence in Managerial Accounting: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst. 2024, 15, 1467–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bharathi, S.V.; Bhosale, S. Prioritizing and Ranking the Cognitive Computing Opportunities for Sustainable Human Resource Management Practices. In Intelligent Systems for Smart Cities; Kulkarni, A.J., Cheikhrouhou, N., Eds.; ICISA 2023; Springer: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Reddy, V.; Hajarath, K. Designing a Cognitive Supply Chain Platform Using Sap ERP Solution for Smart Decision Support. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2024, 9, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Arumugam, S.K.; Abey, J.; Seranmadevi, R.; Srivastava, S.; Dwivedi, A. Cognitive technology in human capital management: A decision analysis model in the banking sector during COVID-19 scenario. Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci. 2024, 17, 657–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Marwala, T. The Commercial Importance of Diversity in Generative AI. United Nations University, UNU Centre. 22 August 2024. Available online: https://unu.edu/article/commercial-importance-diversity-generative-ai (accessed on 30 November 2024).
  120. Burtsev, M.; Reeves, M.; Job, A. The Working Limitations of Large Language Models; MIT Sloan Management Review: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  121. Bai, X.; Wang, A.; Sucholutsky, I.; Griffiths, T.L. Measuring Implicit Bias in Explicitly Unbiased Large Language Models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.04105. [Google Scholar]
  122. Willis, Z.; Luongo, E. Canada Could Be Left Behind in the New AI Revolution. KPMG Insights (Originally Published in the Globe and Mail). 4 October 2023. Available online: https://kpmg.com/ca/en/home/insights/2023/10/canada-could-be-left-behind-in-the-new-ai-revolution.html (accessed on 23 October 2024).
  123. Deloitte. Impact and Opportunities: Canada’s AI Ecosystem—2023. 2023. Available online: www.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ca/Documents/press-releases/ca-national-ai-report-2023-aoda-en.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2024).
  124. Bryan, V.; Sood, S.; Johnston, C. Analysis on Expected Use of Artificial Intelligence by Businesses in Canada, Third Quarter of 2024. 2024. Available online: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-621-m/11-621-m2024013-eng.htm (accessed on 30 November 2024).
  125. Statistics Canada. Canadian Survey on Business Conditions, Third Quarter of 2024; Statistics Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  126. Schönberger, M. Artificial intelligence for small and medium-sized enterprises: Identifying key applications and challenges. J. Bus. Manag. 2023, 21, 89–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tawil, A.-R.H.; Mohamed, M.; Schmoor, X.; Vlachos, K.; Haidar, D. Trends and Challenges towards Effective Data-Driven Decision Making in UK Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Case Studies and Lessons Learnt from the Analysis of 85 Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2024, 8, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hassija, V.; Chamola, V.; Mahapatra, A.; Singal, A.; Goel, D.; Huang, K.; Scardapane, S.; Spinelli, I.; Mahmud, M.; Hussain, A. Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cogn. Comput. 2024, 16, 45–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, R.; Li, H.W.; Qian, X.Y.; Jiang, W.B.; Chen, H.X. On large language models safety, security, and privacy: A survey. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 2025, 100301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cartwright, O.; Dunbar, H.; Radcliffe, T. Evaluating Privacy Compliance in Commercial Large Language Models—ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini; Research Square: Durham, NC, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Motlagh, F.N.; Hajizadeh, M.; Majd, M.; Najafi, P.; Cheng, F.; Meinel, C. Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: State-of-the-Art. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.00891. [Google Scholar]
  132. Ao, S.-I.; Fayek, H. Continual Deep Learning for Time Series Modeling. Sensors 2023, 23, 7167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Baziyad, M.; Kamel, I.; Rabie, T. On the Linguistic Limitations of ChatGPT: An Experimental Case Study. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), Doha, Qatar, 23–26 October 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  134. Connor, J.; Atlas, L.E.; Martin, D.R. Recurrent Networks and N ARMA Modeling. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS Proc.) 1991, 4, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
  135. Houston, M. Mastering the Basics of Business Finance Management. Forbes 2023. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/melissahouston/2023/03/22/mastering-the-basics-of-business-finance-management/ (accessed on 30 November 2024).
  136. Houston, M. Accounting the Key to Your Business’s Success. Forbes 2023. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/melissahouston/2023/12/06/accounting-the-key-to-your-businesss-success/ (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.