Breaking Barriers: Unveiling Factors Influencing the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Providers
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Related Works
3. Methodology
3.1. Study Setting
3.2. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Demographic Characteristics
4.2. Model Evaluation
4.3. Structural Model Evaluation
5. Discussion
- Performance expectancy (PE), initial trust (IT), and propensity to trust (PT)
- Effort expectancy (EE) and social influence (SI)
- Personal innovativeness (PI)
- Task complexity (TAC) and technology characteristics (TC)
- Perceived substitution crisis (PSC)
- Background characteristics
- Patient’s medical characteristics
- Fundamental pitfalls towards AIH adoption
- Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Laï, M.-C.; Brian, M.; Mamzer, M.-F. Perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Findings from a qualitative survey study among actors in France. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Jiang, F.; Jiang, Y.; Zhi, H.; Dong, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, S.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Q.; Shen, H.; Wang, Y. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2017, 2, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Darcy, A.M.; Louie, A.K.; Roberts, L.W. Machine Learning and the Profession of Medicine. JAMA 2016, 315, 551–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Price, I.; Nicholson, W. Artificial intelligence in health care: Applications and legal issues. SciTech Lawyer 2017, 14, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
- TFIRwimahtrWEFnd. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/ (accessed on 11 June 2021).
- Ransing, R.; Nagendrappa, S.; Patil, A.; Shoib, S.; Sarkar, D. Potential role of artificial intelligence to address the COVID-19 out-break-related mental health issues in India. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 290, 113176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Secinaro, S.; Calandra, D.; Secinaro, A.; Muthurangu, V.; Biancone, P. The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A structured literature review. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2021, 21, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, D.D.; Brown, E.W. Artificial intelligence in medical practice: The question to the answer? Am. J. Med. 2018, 131, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, S.; Baek, H.; Jung, E.; Hwang, H.; Yoo, S. Survey on the demand for adoption of Internet of Things (IoT)-based services in hospitals: Investigation of nurses’ perception in a tertiary university hospital. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2019, 47, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.; Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of ac-ceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Khanijahani, A.; Iezadi, S.; Dudley, S.; Goettler, M.; Kroetsch, P.; Wise, J. Organizational, professional, and patient characteristics associated with artificial intelligence adoption in healthcare: A systematic review. Health Policy Technol. 2022, 11, 100602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, H.; Yang, X.; Xue, J.; Lavender, C.; Ye, T.; Li, J.-B.; Xu, L.; Lin, L.; Cao, W.; Sun, Y. Radiation Oncologists’ Perceptions of Adopting an Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Contouring Technology: Model Development and Questionnaire Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e27122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto dos Santos, D.; Giese, D.; Brodehl, S.; Chon, S.H.; Staab, W.; Kleinert, R.; Maintz, D.; Baeßler, B. Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: A multicentre survey. Eur. Radiol. 2019, 29, 1640–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sit, C.; Srinivasan, R.; Amlani, A.; Muthuswamy, K.; Azam, A.; Monzon, L.; Poon, D.S. Attitudes and perceptions of UK medical students towards artificial intelligence and radiology: A multicentre survey. Insights Imaging 2020, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lennartz, S.; Dratsch, T.; Zopfs, D.; Persigehl, T.; Maintz, D.; Hokamp, N.G.; dos Santos, D.P. Use and Control of Artificial Intelligence in Patients Across the Medical Workflow: Single-Center Questionnaire Study of Patient Perspectives. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e24221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naik, N.; Ibrahim, S.; Sircar, S.; Patil, V.; Hameed, B.M.; Rai, B.P.; Chłosta, P.; Somani, B.K. Attitudes and perceptions of outpatients towards adoption of telemedicine in healthcare during COVID-19 pandemic. Ir. J. Med. Sci. (1971-) 2021, 191, 1505–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tavares, J.; Ong, F.S.; Ye, T.; Xue, J.; He, M.; Gu, J.; Lin, H.; Xu, B.; Cheng, Y. Psychosocial Factors Affecting Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Health Care in China: Cross-Sectional Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e14316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Fan, W.; Liu, J.; Zhu, S.; Pardalos, P.M. Investigating the impacting factors for the healthcare professionals to adopt artificial in-telligence-based medical diagnosis support system (AIMDSS). Ann. Oper. Res. 2020, 294, 567–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topol, E.J. High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKnight, D.H. Trust in information technology. Blackwell Encycl. Manag. 2005, 7, 329–331. [Google Scholar]
- Dulle, F.W.; Minishi-Majanja, M. The suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model in open access adoption studies. Inf. Dev. 2011, 27, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Nakrem, S.; Solbjør, M.; Pettersen, I.N.; Kleiven, H.H. Care relationships at stake? Home healthcare professionals’ experiences with digital medicine dispensers—A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018, 18, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Du, J.; Vantilborgh, T. Cultural Differences in The Content of Employees’ Psychological Contract: A Qualitative Study Comparing Belgium and China. Psychol. Belg. 2020, 60, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; Schoorman, F.D. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.Y.; Yang, M.C. Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Consumer Intention to Use an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Mobile Application for Weight Loss and Health Management. Telemed. J. e-Health Off. J. Am. Telemed. Assoc. 2020, 26, 1240–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, L.; Li, J.-Y.; Fu, C.-Y. The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital’s professionals: An integrative perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 2011, 51, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webster, J.; Martocchio, J.J. Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications. MIS Q. 1992, 16, 201–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, M.Y.; Jackson, J.D.; Park, J.S.; Probst, J.C. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Inf. Manag. 2006, 43, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Lu, Y.; Wang, B. Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.P.; Hom, G.L.; Abramoff, M.D.; Campbell, J.P.; Chiang, M.F. Current challenges and barriers to real-world artificial intelli-gence adoption for the healthcare system, provider, and the patient. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haider, H. Barriers to the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare in India; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Shuaib, A.; Arian, H.; Shuaib, A. The Increasing Role of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Will Robots Replace Doctors in the Future? Int. J. Gen. Med. 2020, 13, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, R.M.; Lundsgaarde, H.P. Evaluation of User Acceptance of a Clinical Expert System. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1994, 1, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Yang, K.; Zeng, Z.; Peng, H.; Jiang, Y. Attitudes of Chinese Cancer Patients toward The Clinical Use of Artificial Intelligence. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2019, 13, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Meyer, A.N.D.; Giardina, T.D.; Spitzmueller, C.; Shahid, U.; Scott, T.M.T.; Singh, H. Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e14679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Strategy for AI Discussion. Available online: https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/NationalStrategy-for-AI-Discussion-Paper.pdf#page24 (accessed on 11 June 2022).
- The Bengal Chamber. Reimagining the Possible in the Indian Healthcare Ecosystem with Emerging Technologies; PwC: Kolkata, India, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Health Profile (NHP) of India-2020. Available online: https://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/showfile.php?lid=1155 (accessed on 12 June 2021).
- Guo, J.; Li, B. The Application of Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology in Rural Areas of Developing Countries. Health Equity 2018, 2, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Gujral, G.; Shivarama, J.; Mariappan, M. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Data Science for Developing Intelligent Health Informatics Systems. In Proceedings of the National Conference on AI in HI & VR, SHSS-TISS, Mumbai, India, 30–31 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/04/11/2420243/0/en/Artificial-Intelligence-in-Healthcare-Market-Size-to-Hit-US-187-95-Bn-By-2030.html (accessed on 11 June 2022).
- Naik, N.; Hameed, B.M.Z.; Shetty, D.K.; Swain, D.; Shah, M.; Paul, R.; Aggarwal, K.; Ibrahim, S.; Patil, V.; Smriti, K.; et al. Legal and Ethical Consideration in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Who Takes Responsibility? Front. Surg. 2022, 9, 862322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Performance expectancy |
H1: Performance expectancy has a positive influence on behavioral intention to use AIH. |
Effort expectancy |
H2: Effort expectancy has a positive influence on behavioral intention to use AIH. |
H3: Effort expectancy has a positive influence on performance expectancy for using AIH. |
Social influence |
H4: Social influence has a positive influence on behavioral intention to use AIH. |
Initial trust |
H5: Initial trust has a positive influence on behavioral intention to use AIH. |
Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and initial trust |
H6: Effort expectancy has a positive influence on initial trust in AIH. |
H7: Performance expectancy has a positive influence on initial trust in AIH. |
Social influence and initial trust |
H8: Social influence has a positive influence on initial trust in AIH. |
Personal innovativeness in IT and AI adoption |
H9: Personal innovativeness in IT has a positive influence on effort expectancy for AIH. |
Task complexity and AI adoption |
H10: Task complexity has a positive influence on effort expectancy for AIH. |
Technological characteristics and AI adoption |
H11: Technological characteristics have a positive influence on effort expectancy for AIH. |
Perceived substitution crisis |
H12: Perceived substitution crisis has a negative influence on behavior intention to use AIH. |
Measurements | Constructs |
---|---|
PE1: | Performance Expectancy (PE) |
I find AI useful in the healthcare profession | |
PE2: | |
Using AI would enable me to accelerate my diagnosis and treatment | |
PE3: | |
Using AI would enhance my work performance | |
PE4: | |
Using AI would release my work pressure | |
EE1: | Effort Expectancy (EE) |
I think the diagnosis process of AI is clear and understandable | |
EE2: | |
Learning to use AI would be easy for me | |
EE3: | |
The usage of AI would be easy for me | |
PIIT1: | Personal Innovativeness in Information Technology (PIIT) |
I usually keep an eye on emerging technology | |
PIIT2: | |
I always try out new technology products earlier compared to others | |
PIIT3: | |
In general, I am willing to accept new technology types | |
TAC1: | Task Complexity (TAC) |
I usually have to diagnose some complex diseases | |
TAC2: | |
I usually need to analyze lots of medical data | |
TAC3: | |
My diagnostic target is usually emergency patients | |
TAC4: | |
My diagnostic target usually is severe patients | |
TC1: | Technological Characteristics (TC) |
I think the diagnosis accuracy rate of AI would be higher than that of the individual | |
TC2: | |
I think AI has a clear and understandable diagnosis process | |
TC3: | |
I think AI could provide both diagnosis process and diagnosis results | |
TC4: | |
I think doctors could be able to point out AI’s mistakes and guide them to get the correct diagnosis results | |
TC5: | |
I think AI would work better with doctors for treatment procedures | |
IT1: | Initial Trust (IT) |
I believe AI could provide an accurate diagnosis | |
IT2: | |
I believe AI could provide a reliable diagnosis | |
IT3: | |
I believe AI could provide a safe diagnosis | |
IT4: | |
I believe AI could provide a convenient diagnosis | |
SI1: | Social Influence (SI) |
I think my leaders would want me to use AI | |
SI2: | |
I think many doctors are using AI | |
SI3: | |
I think my patients would want me to use AI | |
SI4: | |
I think using AI is a prevailing trend | |
PSC1: | Perceived Substitution Crisis (PSC) |
I think that AI would likely replace doctors in the future | |
PSC2: | |
I think using AI for a long time would make doctors dependent on it | |
PSC3: | |
I think the rise and development of AI would likely to lead unemployment | |
PSC4: | |
I think using AI for a long time would decrease doctors’ diagnosis ability | |
BI1: | Behavior Intention (BI) |
I would like to use AI if I have an opportunity | |
BI2: | |
I would like to use AI as much as possible if I have an opportunity | |
BI3: | |
I will make sure to use AI if I have an opportunity |
Particulars | N (%) |
---|---|
Gender | |
Male | 284 (71.9) |
Female | 108 (27.3) |
Age | |
≤30 | 199 (50.4) |
31–40 | 126 (31.9) |
41–50 | 41 (10.4) |
>50 | 29 (7.3) |
Work experience | |
<5 | 219 (55.4) |
5–15 | 115 (29.1) |
16–20 | 22 (5.6) |
21–25 | 19 (4.8) |
>25 | 20 (5.1) |
Types of professionals: | |
Senior consultant | 56 (14.2) |
Consultant | 89 (22.7) |
Medical students | 132 (33.67) |
Residents | 79 (20.15) |
Others (technicians and nurses) | 37 (9.43) |
Specialization | |
Urology | 130 (33.16) |
Anesthesiology | 30 (7.65) |
Cardiology | 40 (10.20) |
General surgery | 50 (12.75) |
Dentistry | 50 (12.75) |
Dermatologist | 55 (14.03) |
Others | 37 (9.43) |
N | Mean | Std. Dev. | Items Loaded | Cronbach’s Alpha | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BI | 3 | 4.09 | 0.917 | 0.909–0.933 | 0.910 | 0.943 | 0.848 |
EE | 3 | 4.04 | 0.952 | 0.892–0.924 | 0.901 | 0.938 | 0.835 |
IT | 4 | 3.82 | 0.932 | 0.870–0.933 | 0.935 | 0.954 | 0.838 |
PSC | 4 | 3.68 | 1.0708 | 0.797–0.866 | 0.873 | 0.912 | 0.723 |
PE | 4 | 4.23 | 0.865 | 0.883–0.924 | 0.927 | 0.948 | 0.820 |
PIIT | 3 | 4.2 | 0.887 | 0.888–0.914 | 0.874 | 0.922 | 0.799 |
SI | 4 | 3.82 | 1.023 | 0.883–0.894 | 0.909 | 0.936 | 0.786 |
TAC | 4 | 3.73 | 1.084 | 0.867–0.914 | 0.911 | 0.937 | 0.789 |
TC | 5 | 4.02 | 0.887 | 0.788–0.911 | 0.900 | 0.927 | 0.718 |
BI | EE | IT | PSC | PE | PIIT | SI | TAC | TC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BI | 0.920 | ||||||||
EE | 0.656 | 0.913 | |||||||
IT | 0.754 | 0.736 | 0.915 | ||||||
PSC | 0.463 | 0.480 | 0.577 | 0.850 | |||||
PE | 0.691 | 0.810 | 0.727 | 0.456 | 0.905 | ||||
PIIT | 0.634 | 0.770 | 0.628 | 0.398 | 0.714 | 0.893 | |||
SI | 0.658 | 0.704 | 0.778 | 0.602 | 0.684 | 0.619 | 0.886 | ||
TAC | 0.516 | 0.593 | 0.660 | 0.515 | 0.576 | 0.609 | 0.671 | 0.888 | |
TC | 0.705 | 0.768 | 0.847 | 0.558 | 0.782 | 0.694 | 0.748 | 0.666 | 0.847 |
Hypotheses | Beta | T-Value | f-Square | p-Value | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 (PE-BI) | 0.255 | 4.106 | 0.051 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H2 (EE-BI) | 0.041 | 0.530 | 0.001 | 0.577 | Reject |
H3 (EE-PE) | 0.722 | 17.190 | 1.023 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H4 (SI-BI) | 0.088 | 1.373 | 0.0007 | 0.189 | Reject |
H5 (IT-BI) | 0.468 | 5.919 | 0.169 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H6 (EE-IT) | 0.225 | 3.271 | 0.050 | 0.001 | Accepted |
H7 (PE-IT) | 0.229 | 3.669 | 0.050 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H8 (SI-IT) | 0.463 | 6.314 | 0.324 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H9 (PIIT-EE) | 0.457 | 8.586 | 0.359 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H10 (TAC-PE) | 0.148 | 3.367 | 0.043 | 0.001 | Accepted |
H11 (TC-EE) | 0.451 | 9.62 | 0.350 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H12 (PSC-BI) | 0.004 | 0.084 | 0.000 | 0.943 | Reject |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hameed, B.Z.; Naik, N.; Ibrahim, S.; Tatkar, N.S.; Shah, M.J.; Prasad, D.; Hegde, P.; Chlosta, P.; Rai, B.P.; Somani, B.K. Breaking Barriers: Unveiling Factors Influencing the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Providers. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2023, 7, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020105
Hameed BZ, Naik N, Ibrahim S, Tatkar NS, Shah MJ, Prasad D, Hegde P, Chlosta P, Rai BP, Somani BK. Breaking Barriers: Unveiling Factors Influencing the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Providers. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2023; 7(2):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020105
Chicago/Turabian StyleHameed, BM Zeeshan, Nithesh Naik, Sufyan Ibrahim, Nisha S. Tatkar, Milap J. Shah, Dharini Prasad, Prithvi Hegde, Piotr Chlosta, Bhavan Prasad Rai, and Bhaskar K Somani. 2023. "Breaking Barriers: Unveiling Factors Influencing the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Providers" Big Data and Cognitive Computing 7, no. 2: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020105
APA StyleHameed, B. Z., Naik, N., Ibrahim, S., Tatkar, N. S., Shah, M. J., Prasad, D., Hegde, P., Chlosta, P., Rai, B. P., & Somani, B. K. (2023). Breaking Barriers: Unveiling Factors Influencing the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Providers. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020105