Next Article in Journal
A Review of New Experimental Technologies for the Development of Advanced Fans with High Bypass Ratio
Previous Article in Journal
Excellence in Turbomachinery Research: The Best of the 12th European Turbomachinery Conference
Open AccessArticle

Optimization of the LS89 Axial Turbine Profile Using a CAD and Adjoint Based Approach

Turbomachinery Department, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, 1640 Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is an extended version of our paper in Proceedings of the European Turbomachinery Conference ETC12, 2017, Paper No. 087.
Int. J. Turbomach. Propuls. Power 2018, 3(3), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp3030020
Received: 27 June 2018 / Accepted: 6 August 2018 / Published: 9 August 2018
The LS89 high pressure axial turbine vane was originally designed and optimized for a downstream isentropic Mach number of 0.9. This profile has been widely used for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation in the open literature but very few attempts have been made to improve the already optimized design. This paper presents a sound methodology to design and optimize the LS89 using computer-aided design (CAD) at design conditions. The novelty of the study resides in the parametrization of design space, which is done at the CAD level, and the detailed analysis of the aerodynamic performance of the optimized design. Higher level constraints are imposed on the shape, such as the trailing edge thickness, the axial chord length, and G2 geometric continuity between the suction side and pressure side at the leading edge. The gradients used for the optimization are obtained by applying algorithmic differentiation to the CAD kernel and grid generator and the discrete adjoint method to the CFD solver. A reduction of almost 12% entropy generation is achieved, which is equivalent to a 16% total pressure loss reduction. The entropy generation is reduced while keeping the exit flow angle as a flow constraint, which is enforced via the penalty formulation. The resulting unconstrained optimization problem is solved by the L-BFGS-B algorithm. The flow is governed by the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and the one-equation transport Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. The optimal profile is compared and benchmarked against the baseline case. View Full-Text
Keywords: base pressure; profile losses; algorithmic differentiation; adjoint optimization base pressure; profile losses; algorithmic differentiation; adjoint optimization
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanchez Torreguitart, I.; Verstraete, T.; Mueller, L. Optimization of the LS89 Axial Turbine Profile Using a CAD and Adjoint Based Approach . Int. J. Turbomach. Propuls. Power 2018, 3, 20.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop