Next Article in Journal
Challenges of Screening and Investigations of Contacts of Patients with Tuberculosis in Oyo and Osun States, Nigeria
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Bait Acceptance and Immune Response in Local Dogs during an Oral Rabies Vaccination Field Study in Morocco
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
TropicalMed
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/tropicalmed9070143
tropicalmed-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

One Health Approach to Toxoplasmosis: Owner and Dog Seropositivity as Spatial Indicators of Risk Areas for Acquired, Gestational and Congenital Transmission

by
Natacha Sohn-Hausner
1,
Ricardo Guedes Correa
2,
Louise Bach Kmetiuk
1,
Evelyn Cristine da Silva
3,
Gustavo Nunes de Moraes
3,
Gabrielle dos Santos Rocha
3,
Helio Langoni
3 and
Alexander Welker Biondo
1,2,*
1
Graduate College of Cell and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, PR, Brazil
2
Graduate College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, PR, Brazil
3
Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-681, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2024, 9(7), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9070143
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 18 June 2024 / Accepted: 25 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section One Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Toxoplasmosis has been of public health concern due to direct associations with socioeconomic vulnerability and inadequate living conditions. Methods: Accordingly, the present study aimed to assess antibodies against T. gondii, historical reported toxoplasmosis cases and associated socio-environmental risk factors in Pinhais, a full urban area of Curitiba, currently the eighth biggest metropolitan area of Brazil. Anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies were assessed by an indirect immunofluorescence reaction (RIFI). Owner and dog samples were also tested by IFAT to anti-Leishmania spp. and anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies. Results: Overall, 20/135 (14.8%) persons and 13/133 (9.8%) dogs from 25 different households were considered seropositive to T. gondii. All samples were seronegative to Leishmania spp. and Trypanosoma cruzi. Conclusions: Although no significant covariates were found in the regression model, statistically associated risk factors in the bivariate analysis included no public water use (p = 0.016) and drinking raw milk (p = 0.041) for owners, and obesity (p = 0.028) and tick infestation (p = 0.03) for dogs. In addition, a spatial cluster of T. gondii seropositivity for both owners and their dogs overlapped the location of historic reported cases of human acquired, gestational and congenital toxoplasmosis. Finally, the results herein showed tick infestation as an indicator of socio-environmental risk for T. gondii exposure in the household environment, and dogs may be used as sentinels for human toxoplasmosis cases.

1. Introduction

Parasitic diseases have remained among the main causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America [1,2]. Many of these pathogens have been included in the so-called neglected diseases group, which may affect nearly 90% of unhealthy habitants on the planet but receive less than 10% of all resources invested in research, control, or eradication [3]. Among them, zoonotic protozoan infections such as toxoplasmosis, leishmaniasis and Chagas disease have been of public health importance due to direct association with poverty and inadequate living conditions [4]. Although such neglected diseases may have significantly decreased in recent years, developing global areas have still accounted for higher morbidity and mortality.
Toxoplasmosis, caused by the T. gondii protozoon and among the most dispersed zoonotic infections worldwide, and with cats as the only definitive hosts, may cause serious human and animal injuries, particularly in fetuses [5,6]. Although not the definitive hosts, dogs may be epidemiologically involved in T. gondii transmission as sentinels for human disease [7,8,9]. While the most affected human and cat organs are the lungs and eyes, dogs most commonly present neurological manifestations [6].
Despite pregnant women and infected immunosuppressed patients experiencing serious illness [5,10], acute cases have been generally limited and recorded in low occurrences [11]. On the other hand, chronic infection has been estimated in a wide prevalence range from 10 to 75% in several countries worldwide [12]. In Brazil, serosurveys have indicated that approximately 50% of children and 80% of childbearing-age women present antibodies against T. gondii [13]. In addition to high prevalence, Brazil has also accounted for 35.3% of all outbreaks reported globally in the past 50 years [13], including the two largest outbreaks recorded to date, in 2001 and 2018 [14,15,16].
The most common T. gondii infection source for intermediate hosts (such as humans and dogs) has been the ingestion of raw or undercooked meat containing bradyzoites, followed by the ingestion of environmental oocysts and the transplacental transmission of tachyzoites [6,17]. Nonetheless, oral transmission itself may not explain the common occurrence of toxoplasmosis in a variety of hosts, such as herbivores, birds, and wild rodents [18]. The maintenance of T. gondii parasites in nature and routes of transmission to domestic and wildlife hosts remain to be fully established, with some studies suggesting that maintenance may occur through ticks [19,20,21].
Although toxoplasmosis has been directly associated with socioeconomic vulnerability and inadequate living conditions, spatial distribution of owner and dog seropositivity on actual reported cases have not been conducted to date. Accordingly, the present study aimed to assess antibodies against T. gondii, historically reported toxoplasmosis cases and associated socio-environmental risk factors in Pinhais, a completely urbanized area of Curitiba, currently the eighth largest metropolitan area of Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Statement

The present study was approved by the National Research Ethics Commission, Brazilian Ministry of Health (protocol number 34934220.4.0000.0102/2020) and by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals at the Federal University of Paraná (protocol number 078/2019).

2.2. Study Area

This study was carried out in Pinhais (25°25′57′′ S and 49°11′35′′ W), Paraná state, southern Brazil, the eighth most populous metropolitan region in Brazil, with 3,731,769 inhabitants, and the second-largest metropolitan region nationwide, covering 16,581.21 km2. The area satisfied the Cfb Köppen climate classification, with annual mean temperature of 17 °C and annual rainfall of 1550 mm [22]. Pinhais has been divided into 15 neighborhoods and 4 hydrographic regions (Iraí, do Meio, Palmital and Atuba rivers) with different environmental and population characteristics [23].

2.3. Samplings and Testing

The sampling design was a convenience design, based on complaint protocols of household tick infestation reported to the Department of Health at Pinhais. Collections were performed by a multidisciplinary taskforce from April 2019 to November 2020. All volunteers signed an informed consent form before any information or blood samples were obtained. Blood samples were collected in tubes with separating gel from owners by venipuncture of the median cubital vein by certified nurses, from in their dogs by venipuncture of the jugular or cephalic vein by certified veterinarians. Following collection, samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, sera were separated and stored at –20 °C until serological analysis.
Both owner and dog serum samples were tested for specific IgG antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii, Leishmania spp. and Trypanosoma cruzi by indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) as previously described [24]. T. gondii tachyzoites (RH strain) were obtained by means of intraperitoneal inoculation of tachyzoites in Swiss mice and recovery of the suspensions 30 days after infection. The Leishmania major-like promastigotes (strain MHOM/SU/73/5-ASKH; Fiocruz IOC/L0581) and T. cruzi (strain Y) epimastigotes were cultivated in LIT medium (Liver Infusion Tryptose) supplemented with fetal bovine serum and antibiotic solution (Gentocin® 40 mg/mL) in solid medium maintained at 26 °C, with fortnightly replications.
Immunofluorescence slides were previously sensitized with the given protozoa, inactivated with 0.1% formaldehyde, and then stained for fluorescence using a specific commercial anti-IgG antibody (human or canine) conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc., Montgomery, TX, USA). Readings were taken by a veterinary technician using an immunofluorescence microscope. Seropositive samples were established with a cutoff of antibody titers ≥ 16 for T. gondii screening up to 4096, ≥40 for Leishmania spp. and T. cruzi screening up to 640, and final serum titers were determined by the highest dilution with ≥50% parasites still fluorescing [25]. To ensure reliable results, positive and negative control sera were added to each slide in all readings.

2.4. Epidemiological Data Collection

Predefined epidemiological questionnaires based on previous studies and the published literature were provided to owner volunteers to complete concerning themselves and their dogs, to assess potential associated risk factors for T. gondii, Leishmania spp. and T. cruzi infection. These questionnaires contained close-ended questions about variables associated with likely exposure of owners and their dogs to pathogens. The questions were related to socioeconomic-environmental variables, personal sanitary habits and animal behavior, health, and management.
Locations of all documented cases until December 2020 to the Pinhais municipality through the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN, abbreviation of “Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação” in Portuguese). The SINAN is responsible for notification, investigation and, in the case of communicable diseases, follow-up and treatment. The diseases and conditions recorded by the SINAN are defined by the National Compulsory Notification List of diseases [26].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were descriptively analyzed at first with simple (n) and relative (%) frequency estimates for all variables in the database. Subsequently, the association with positive results (data from the questionnaires) was assessed using the chi-square test and estimated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval. Multiple logistic regression models were produced to obtain the profile of the cases. In multiple modeling, variables with p < 0.20 were selected to start the models. The method used for input and output of the variables was stepwise, starting from the most complex model to the simplest one. The criteria used to remain in the final model included changes >10% in the OR, improvement in the accuracy of the 95% CI, statistical significance, degrees of freedom and adjustment of the AIC of the model. Spatial analyses were carried out based on the georeferencing of the locations (addresses) of the protocols and reported cases by the SINAN and thematic maps and cluster analysis (kernel density) were produced. All analyses were performed in the R 4.0.4 environment, with a minimum significance level of 5%.

3. Results

3.1. Serological Analysis

Overall, 20/135 (14.8%) owner samples were seropositive for T. gondii with titers of 16 (80.0%), 64 (15.0%) and 256 (5.0%) (Table 1), while 13/133 (9.8%) dog samples were seropositive with titers of 16 (76.92%) and 64 (23.08%) (Table 2). All owner (0/135) and dog (0/133) samples were seronegative for Leishmania spp. and T. cruzi.

3.2. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of associated risk factors for T. gondii exposure was performed with logistic regression models made with the owner and dog serological results as the dependent variable and with applied epidemiological questionnaires as independent variables, with p-value < 0.2 in the bivariate analysis considered significant (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). No final model was found with significant variables for both owner (Table 3) and dog (Table 4) seropositivity.
Addresses were georeferenced based on the notification forms of patients residing in Pinhais for spatial assessment, visualization, and analysis of risk areas of each disease (Figure 1). In the historical record, a total of 87 toxoplasmosis cases were reported by the SINAN between 2015 and 2020, with 28 cases of acquired, 43 of gestational, and 16 cases of congenital toxoplasmosis distributed in residents of 12 neighborhoods. In addition, nine human leishmaniasis cases were reported between 2007 and 2020 and distributed in six neighborhoods. Finally, 25 human Chagas cases were reported between 2013 and 2018 in residents of eight neighborhoods. Only three neighborhoods had no notification of any of the three surveyed diseases.
To verify the presence of toxoplasmosis clusters, a Kernel density analysis was performed with human seropositive location and overlapped with seropositive dogs. In addition, clusters was inversely verified, with Kernel density of seropositive dogs location overlapped with the points with seropositive humans, and compared with the notified cases of toxoplasmosis in the municipality (Figure 2)

4. Discussion

The results found concerning antibodies to T. gondii in both human (14.8%) and canine (9.8%) samples, and none to Leishmania spp. and T. cruzi, corroborate those of previous serosurveys, with prevalent occurrences of human [27] and dog [28] toxoplasmosis, but no report to date of confirmed human or dog autochthonous cases in the Curitiba metropolitan area, Paraná state, of visceral leishmaniasis [29] or Chagas disease [28].
The relatively low human T. gondii seroprevalence herein (14.81%), compared to previous studies ranging from 59.8% to 72.6% in the general Paraná state population [30,31], may be due to regional characteristics, as seropositivity has varied from 10% to 90% worldwide [32]. As Curitiba has been considered the most sustainable city countrywide for years and is currently ranked as the eighth highest in population, sixth in gross domestic product (GDP) and tenth in human development index (HDI) out of 5565 municipalities in Brazil, this outcome may be the result of high density city infrastructure. Likewise, developed countries such as France have decreased their toxoplasmosis prevalence from 80% to about 30% between 1960 and 2016 due to increased knowledge and implementation of preventive actions by pregnant women [33], such as changes in eating habits and the improvement in hygiene conditions [34]. In Brazil, human toxoplasmosis was included within the compulsory notification list in 2016 by the Ministry of Health, with nationwide integrated surveillance of gestational, congenital, and acquired toxoplasmosis and recommendation of serological prenatal screening [35].
Owner seropositivity to toxoplasmosis in the present study was associated as a risk factor to no public water use (p = 0.016), as expected, since contamination by T. gondii oocysts present in untreated water may be one of the main infection routes [36], both in continental and island areas [37]. Oocysts may survive better in humid environments and are able to remain viable up to 200 days when kept in water between 10 °C and 25 °C [38]. Another significant associated risk factor was drinking raw milk (p = 0.041), which has also been considered a common route of T. gondii infection and increases infection probability [39]. As a limitation of the present study, consumption of pasteurized or UHT pasteurized milk data were not accessible, which may have impaired comparisons with the consumption of raw milk. In addition, due to difficulties in capture, restraint, potential scratching and biting, the city secretary of health denied cat samplings for this study, which should be further investigated. Although no significance was found for these covariates in the regression model, the ingestion of contaminated water, milk, or contaminated foods, has long represented an important route of toxoplasmosis transmission [38].
Dog seropositivity to toxoplasmosis in this study was comparable to that in previous Parana state studies, varying mostly by region with 16.3% prevalence at northern [31,40,41], and 67.02% at western [36], and 23.3% at eastern coastal [37] state regions, along with 30.7% in neighborhood [28] and 7.95% in hoarded dogs [42] at the state capital Curitiba. Nationwide, the seroprevalence of T. gondii in Brazilian domestic dogs has widely ranged from 5% to 88.52% [41,43,44,45], with rural and hunting dogs exhibiting a higher prevalence (34.3% and 31.2%) than urban dogs (19.7%) [46,47]. Worldwide, prevalence varies according to surveyed region [48], ranging from 64.7% to 78% in western Cuba [49], from 75.15% to 89.86% in west-central Ethiopia [50] and 17.3% to 34.7% in south-western China [51].
A body weight slightly above normal for dogs was a significant associated risk factor (p = 0.028) to T. gondii seropositivity, which may indicate a closer human–dog interaction, as a significant association (p = 0.008; OR = 2.81) was previously found between the presence of anti-T. gondii in dogs with their seropositive owners [37]. In addition, dog serological surveys may be important to assess the degree of infection spreading between humans and animals [52]. Finally, as shown herein, dogs may be good sentinels for assessing environmental contamination [53].
Interestingly, tick infestation herein was a significant variable (p = 0.03) associated with T. gondii seropositivity in dogs, as the possibility of toxoplasmosis transmission by ticks has been proposed by previous reports [54,55]. Despite the lack of experimental evidence that T. gondii transmission can occur from infected ticks to their hosts, mechanical transmission through the ingestion of infected ticks may be an alternative transmission route [18,21], as T. gondii may survive in the body of ticks for more than 10 days [18,56].
T. gondii has been detected in several tick species in different countries [18], such as Dermacentor reticulatus and Ixodes ricinus in Poland [57], Amblyomma spp. in the Republic of Chad [58], Haemaphysalis longicornis in China [21], and H. longicornis and Haemaphysalis flava in Korea [59]. Moreover, a significant regional difference has been found in contamination within countries, which may reflect the difference in T gondii environmental contamination [59]. In such a scenario, the present study may provide important information on potential environmental maintenance and alternative transmission routes of T. gondii by ticks, and further studies should be conducted to fully establish the transmission role of ticks in highly infested household settings. Regardless, ticks should be controlled and eradicated in any circumstance, as they are responsible for several tick-borne diseases of life-threatening impact for owners and their dogs.
As already mentioned, no case report of human or dog visceral leishmaniasis has been made in the Curitiba metropolitan area, Paraná state [29]. Human and dog cases of visceral leishmania have been mostly reported outside of urban areas and nearby rivers and recently deforested regions of the Paraná state [60], similar to other Brazilian states such as Minas Gerais [61], Piauí [62], Fortaleza [63], Mato Grosso [64] and Pernambuco [65], also associated with low-density infrastructure favoring vector growth, infection and transmission [66]. Thus, the leishmaniasis seronegativity herein may reflect the adequate infrastructure of the Curitiba metropolitan area, Paraná state, associated with the absence or low number of infected Lutzomyia spp. vectors due to unfavorable environmental conditions for vector maintenance such as climate and altitude [67]. In addition, the low number of cases found statewide may be a consequence of the mandatory euthanasia of seropositive dogs, considered the main Leishmania spp. reservoir in the domestic environment of Brazil [68]. Nationwide, prevalence to Leishmania spp. varies from 0.0027% to 32.5% [29,69] and from 2.0% to 4.0% for T. cruzi [70,71]. As the anti-Leishmania vaccination has been restricted by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture due to lack of efficacy, such vaccine status was not assessed in the dogs herein [72].
Expectedly, the present study showed an absence of owner and dog cases of Chagas disease, which mainly occurs in the northern Brazilian region with over 70% of reported new cases [73], mostly affecting socially vulnerable and uneducated people [74]. Even without seropositive samples for T. cruzi identified in our study and no autochthonous report of Chagas disease to date, Curitiba contains a series of forest fragments and city parks, providing a favorable environment for vector maintenance [75]. In addition, city surveillance reports in December, 2020 identified the presence of Panstrongylus megistus [62], a main transmission vector of T. cruzi in Brazil.
A major contribution of the present study is the combined spatial analysis of owner and dog T. gondii seropositivity. Through kernel density analysis, clusters of both human and dog T. gondii seropositivity overlapped with each other and overlapped with the historical cases reported by the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN). Despite such distribution differences from a previous owner–dog toxoplasmosis study in the north [31] and similarities with another human toxoplasmosis survey in north-western Paraná state [76], both studies indicated socioeconomic vulnerability as an associated risk factor for T. gondii exposure. Although the low prevalence found herein may reflect the better socioeconomic conditions of the municipality, the spatial clusters of owner and dog seropositivity overlapped the historical cases. Moreover, the kernel density maps were located in neighborhoods with a greater number of toxoplasmosis cases reported by SINAN. Despite previous studies in Brazil and Latin America showing an association and a three-fold-increased risk for toxoplasmosis in low-income populations, including pregnant women and dogs, affecting the geographic distribution of disease transmission [36,38,77,78,79,80,81,82,83], no study to date has proposed human and dog T. gondii seropositivity as spatial indicators of risk areas for actual transmission of acquired, gestational, and congenital toxoplasmosis.
Identification of toxoplasmosis risk areas may be crucial to support better diagnosis, control, and preventive programs, as these areas may lead to a greater probability of environmental T. gondii contamination and consequently an increase in human and animal infection [84]. Thus, future projections of human population growth and potential tropical change scenarios should be analyzed with disease risk altogether, particularly zoonoses, as human density increase in urban areas may be accompanied by an increase in density of domestic and feral cats, which are definitive hosts of T. gondii [85]. As an increase in intense rainfall events interspersed by longer periods of drought has been predicted to occur as a consequence of climate change in Curitiba [86], this new pattern may lead to a greater dispersion and oocyst uptake, due to the capacity of T. gondii to persist in the environment [38].
Moreover, global warming and other climate changes may expand the current distribution of ticks and other vectors such as sandflies, spreading to previously uninfected areas [87]. Surveys on the One Health approach, which characterized the human–animal–environment interface through intersectoral collaboration and multidisciplinary teams, have provided a more comprehensive understanding of disease cycles and associated public health risks [88,89]. In addition, the globalization of trade and travel may contribute to international pathogen spreading [90], demanding such holistic and borderless approaches.
As limitations, the IFAT applied herein may vary in accuracy among laboratories due to differences in sensitivity and specificity, influencing results and, therefore, restricting their comparisons [89]. Another limitation may be the under- or misreporting of diseases, particularly toxoplasmosis, possibly due to lack of diagnosis or misdiagnosis, inadequate medical records, patient failure to seek medical care, or even a deficiency in the local surveillance system, impairing their report to SINAN. Finally, although considered more visual than other analyses, the kernel approach may be limited by not considering the number of samples examined for assessment of heating areas [31].
Finally, despite other “One Health approach” studies on toxoplasmosis, our assessment of tick infestation in association with unrelated disease has shown an important indicator of socio-environmental risk for T. gondii exposure in the household environment, along with dogs as potential sentinels for human toxoplasmosis cases.

5. Conclusions

The present study has shown a low seroprevalence of T. gondii and no detection of anti-T. cruzi and anti-Leishmania spp. antibodies in the blood samples of asymptomatic owners and their dogs in southern Brazil. Owners who did not use public water and drank raw milk, as well as dogs with a higher body score and tick infestation, were statistically more likely to be exposed to T. gondii. In addition, tick infestation in dogs was an associated risk factor for T. gondii exposure, indicating a direct risk by tick transmission or an indirect risk as an indicator of socioeconomical vulnerability. As toxoplasmosis in urban settings relies mostly on cats as definitive hosts, a further One Heath approach study should also consider the presence, number, and tick infestation of cats in such households.
The cluster of seropositive dogs to T. gondii overlapped the cluster of seropositive owners, both overlapping the historical reported cases of different toxoplasmosis presentations in the municipality. This One Health approach has indicated that owner and dog seropositivities act as spatial indicators of risk areas for acquired, gestational, and congenital transmission.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed9070143/s1, Table S1. Risk factors for T. gondii exposure in humans from Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil. Table S2. Risk factors for T. gondii exposure in dogs from Pinhais. Paraná state, Brazil.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S.-H. and A.W.B.; methodology, N.S.-H., R.G.C., L.B.K., E.C.d.S., H.L. and A.W.B.; software, N.S.-H.; validation, H.L.; formal analysis, N.S.-H., R.G.C., L.B.K., E.C.d.S., G.N.d.M. and G.d.S.R.; investigation, N.S.-H., L.B.K. and A.W.B.; resources, N.S.-H., H.L. and A.W.B.; data curation, N.S.-H.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.-H. and A.W.B.; writing—review and editing, N.S.-H., L.B.K. and A.W.B.; visualization, N.S.-H., L.B.K. and A.W.B.; supervision, N.S.-H., L.B.K. and A.W.B.; project administration, N.S.-H. and A.W.B.; funding acquisition, N.S.-H. and A.W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The present study was approved by the National Research Ethics Commission, Brazilian Ministry of Health (protocol number 34934220.4.0000.0102/2020) and by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals at the Federal University of Paraná (protocol number 078/2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of the Department of Health of the Municipality of Pinhais, Curitiba metropolitan area, for all their kindly help provided during sample collection of owners and their dogs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, R.; Peng, J.; Mohsin, M.; Huang, X.; Lin, X.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L.; Huang, Z.; Yin, G. Construction and evaluation of the Toxoplasma gondii DNA vaccine targeting DEC-205. Pak. Vet. J. 2022, 42, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohsin, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Yin, G.; Zhang, Z. Development of CRISPR-CAS9 based RNA drugs against Eimeria tenella infection. Genomics 2021, 113, 4126–4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Engels, D.; Zhou, X.-N. Neglected tropical diseases: An effective global response to local poverty-related disease priorities. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2020, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. CDC Parasites. 2024. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/index.html (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  5. Almeria, S.; Dubey, J.P. Foodborne transmission of Toxoplasma gondii infection in the last decade. An overview. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hill, D.E.; Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasma gondii as a Parasite in Food: Analysis and Control. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 227–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lindsay, D.S.; Dubey, J.P.; Butler, J.M.; Blagburn, B.L. Mechanical transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by dogs. Vet. Parasitol. 1997, 73, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. FRENKEL, J.K.; PARKER, B.B. An Apparent Role of Dogs in the Transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: The Probable Importance of Xenosmophilia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1996, 791, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bresciani, K.D.S.; da Costa, A.J.; Navarro, I.T.; Toniollo, G.H.; Sakamoto, C.A.M.; Arantes, T.P.; Gennari, S.M. Toxoplasmose canina: Aspectos clínicos e patológicos. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2008, 29, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Capobiango, J.D.; Mitsuka Breganó, R.; Navarro, I.T.; Rezende Neto, C.P.; Barbante Casella, A.M.; Ruiz Lopes Mori, F.M.; Pagliari, S.; Inoue, I.T.; Reiche, E.M.V. Congenital toxoplasmosis in a reference center of Paraná, Southern Brazil. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 18, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zoonosis y Enfermedades Transmisibles Comunes al Hombre y a los Animales: Parasitosis, v.3, 3 ed. 2024. Available online: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/3323?show=full&locale-attribute=pt (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  12. Woodhall, D.; Jones, J.L.; Cantey, P.T.; Wilkins, P.P.; Montgomery, S.P. Neglected parasitic infections: What every family physician needs to know. Am. Fam. Physician 2014, 89, 803–811. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dubey, J.P.; Lago, E.G.; Gennari, S.M.; Su, C.; Jones, J.L. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: High prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology 2012, 139, 1375–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. de Moura, L.; Bahia-Oliveira, L.M.G.; Wada, M.Y.; Jones, J.L.; Tuboi, S.H.; Carmo, E.H.; Ramalho, W.M.; Camargo, N.J.; Trevisan, R.; Graça, R.M.T.; et al. Waterborne toxoplasmosis, Brazil, from field to gene. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 326–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. de Almeida, M.J.; de Oliveira, L.H.H.; Freire, R.L.; Navarro, I.T. Aspectos sociopolíticos da epidemia de toxoplasmose em Santa Isabel do ivaí (PR). Cienc. Saude Coletiva 2011, 16, 1363–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dal Ponte, S.; Burguez, D.; Andrioli, G. Outbreak of Toxoplasmosis in the City of Santa Maria, Brazil. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2019, 34, s74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ben-Harari, R.R. Tick transmission of toxoplasmosis. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2019, 17, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sroka, J.; Wójcik-Fatla, A.; Zwoliński, J.; Zając, V.; Sawczuk, M.; Dutkiewicz, J. Preliminary study on the occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii in Ixodes ricinus ticks from north-western Poland with the use of PCR. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2008, 15, 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  20. Skotarczak, B.I. The role of ticks in transmission cycle of Toxoplasma gondii. Ann. Parasitol. 2016, 62, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Cao, J.; Gong, H.; Zhou, J. Epidemiology of toxoplasmosis: Role of the tick Haemaphysalis longicornis. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2016, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alvares, C.A.; Stape, J.L.; Sentelhas, P.C.; De Moraes Gonçalves, J.L.; Sparovek, G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Z. 2013, 22, 711–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pinhais, P.-P.M. de Plano de Habitação e Regularização Fundiária: Diagnóstico Final, 2010. 2024. Available online: https://silo.tips/queue/prefeito-municipal-luis-goularte-alves?&queue_id=-1&v=1713631289&u=MjgwNDozODk6YzAzMjoxZWRiOmFjMDI6NjgwYzphMzk0OjdiZg== (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  24. Camargo, M.E. Introdução às técnicas de imunofluorescência. Rev. Bras. Patol. Clínica 1974, 10, 112. [Google Scholar]
  25. Camargo, M.E. Fluorescent antibody test for the serodiagnosis of American trypanosomiasis. Technical modification employing preserved culture forms of Trypanosoma cruzi in a slide test. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 1966, 8, 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ministério da Saúde. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2014/prt1271_06_06_2014.html (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  27. Vaz, R.S.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Sumikawa, E.; Guimarães, A.T.B. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in pregnant women from Southern Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 106, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Constantino, C.; Pellizzaro, M.; de Paula, E.F.E.; Vieira, T.S.W.J.; Brandão, A.P.D.; Ferreira, F.; Vieira, R.F.D.C.; Langoni, H.; Biondo, A.W. Serosurvey for Leishmania spp., Toxoplasma gondii, Trypanosoma cruzi and Neospora caninum in neighborhood dogs in Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. = Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol. Orgao Col. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2016, 25, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Frehse, M.; Greca, H.; Ullmann, L.; Camossi, L.; Machado, J.; Langoni, H.; Biondo, A.; Molento, M. Surveillance of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a disease-free area. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2010, 19, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bittencourt, L.H.F.D.B.; Lopes-Mori, F.M.R.; Mitsuka-Breganó, R.; Valentim-Zabott, M.; Freire, R.L.; Pinto, S.B.; Navarro, I.T. Soroepidemiologia da toxoplasmose em gestantes a partir da implantação do Programa de Vigilância da Toxoplasmose Adquirida e Congênita em municípios da região oeste do Paraná. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obs. 2012, 34, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Benitez, A.; Gonçalves, D.; Nino, B.; Caldart, E.; Freire, R.; Navarro, I. Seroepidemiology of toxoplasmosis in humans and dogs from a small municipality in parana, Brazil. Ciência Anim. Bras. 2017, 18, e42102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pappas, G.; Roussos, N.; Falagas, M.E. Toxoplasmosis snapshots: Global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and implications for pregnancy and congenital toxoplasmosis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Picone, O.; Fuchs, F.; Benoist, G.; Binquet, C.; Kieffer, F.; Wallon, M.; Wehbe, K.; Mandelbrot, L.; Villena, I. Toxoplasmosis screening during pregnancy in France: Opinion of an expert panel for the CNGOF. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 49, 101814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nogareda, F.; Le Strat, Y.; Villena, I.; De Valk, H.; Goulet, V. Incidence and prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in women in France, 1980–2020: Model-based estimation. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014, 142, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Protocolo de Notificação e Investigação: Toxoplasmose Gestacional e Congênita. 2024. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/protocolo_notificacao_investigacao_toxoplasmose_gestacional_congenita.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  36. Pinto-Ferreira, F.; Pasquali, A.K.S.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Mitsuka-Breganó, R.; Caldart, E.T.; Leandro, A.D.S.; Chiyo, L.; Pozzolo, E.M.; Cubas, P.; Giordano, L.G.P.; et al. Epidemiological relevance of dogs for the prevention of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Leptospira spp. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Veterinária 2019, 28, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Freitas, A.R.; Delai, R.R.; Kmetiuk, L.B.; da Silva, E.C.; Martini, R.; Brandão, A.P.D.; Giuffrida, R.; de Barros-Filho, I.R.; Costa da Silva, R.; Langoni, H.; et al. Seropositivity of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies in Owners and Their Dogs Living on Island and Mainland Seashore Areas of Southern Brazil. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Shapiro, K.; Bahia-Oliveira, L.; Dixon, B.; Dumètre, A.; de Wit, L.A.; VanWormer, E.; Villena, I. Environmental transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: Oocysts in water, soil and food. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 15, e00049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Silveira, M.; Filho, M.; Oliveira, S.; Oliveira, K.; Nascente, F.; Rezende, H.; Castro, A.; Avelar, J. Soroprevalência e fatores de risco para toxoplasmose em gestantes na região metropolitana de Goiânia, Goiás, Brasil. Braz. J. Health Rev. 2020, 3, 729–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. de Paula Dreer, M.K.; Goncalves, D.D.; da Silva Caetano, I.C.; Geronimo, E.; Menegas, P.H.; Bergo, D.; Ruiz Lopes-Mori, F.M.; Benitez, A.; de Freitas, J.C.; Evers, F.; et al. Toxoplasmosis, leptospirosis and brucellosis in stray dogs housed at the shelter in Umuarama municipality, Parana, Brazil. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 19, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Caldart, E.T.; Constantino, C.; Sbruzzi Pasquali, A.K.; Benitez, A.D.N.; Hamada, F.N.; Ferreira Dias, R.C.; Rorato-Nascimento, A.M.; Marangoni Marana, E.R.; Navarro, I.T.; Freres Mascarenhas, N.M.; et al. Zoonosis in dogs and cats attended by the Birth Control Project: Toxoplasma gondii, Leishmania spp. and Leptospira spp., serodiagnosis and epidemiology. Semin. Agrar. 2015, 36, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. da Cunha, G.R.; Pellizzaro, M.; Martins, C.M.; Rocha, S.M.; Yamakawa, A.C.; da Silva, E.C.; dos Santos, A.P.; Morikawa, V.M.; Langoni, H.; Biondo, A.W. Spatial serosurvey of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in individuals with animal hoarding disorder and their dogs in Southern Brazil. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tenter, A.M.; Heckeroth, A.R.; Weiss, L.M. Toxoplasma gondii: From animals to humans. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 1217–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Carlos, R.; Albuquerque, G.; Bezerra, R.; Sicupira, P.; Munhoz, A.; Lopes, C. Ocurrence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies and the risk factors associated with canine infection at ilhéus-itabuna region in the state of Bahia. Rev. Bras. Med. Vet. 2010, 32, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dantas, S.B.A.; da Fonseca Fernandes, A.R.; Neto, O.L.D.S.; Mota, R.A.; Alves, C.J.; de Azevedo, S.S. Ocorrência e fatores de risco associados às infecções por Toxoplasma gondii e Neospora caninum em c ães no município de Natal, Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Nordeste do Brasil. Cienc. Rural 2013, 43, 2042–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Souza, S.L.P.; Gennari, S.M.; Yai, L.E.O.; D’Auria, S.R.N.; Cardoso, S.M.S.; Junior, J.S.G.; Dubey, J.P. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in sera from dogs of the urban and rural areas from Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2003, 12, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  47. Machado, F.P.; Kmetiuk, L.B.; Teider-Junior, P.I.; Pellizzaro, M.; Yamakawa, A.C.; Martins, C.M.; Bach, R.V.W.; Morikawa, V.M.; de Barros-Filho, I.R.; Langoni, H.; et al. Seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in wild boars (Sus scrofa), hunting dogs, and hunters of Brazil. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dubey, J.P.; Murata, F.H.A.; Cerqueira-Cézar, C.K.; Kwok, O.C.H.; Yang, Y.; Su, C. Toxoplasma gondii infections in dogs: 2009–2020. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 287, 109223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Navarrete, M.G.; Cordeiro, M.D.; Batista, Y.; Alonso, J.C.; Márquez, M.; Roque, E.; Fonseca, A. Serological detection of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic dogs in the western region of Cuba. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2017, 9, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gebremedhin, E.Z.; Sarba, E.J.; Tola, G.K.; Endalew, S.S.; Marami, L.M.; Melkamsew, A.T.; Lo Presti, V.D.M.; Vitale, M. Prevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii and Leishmania spp. infections in apparently healthy dogs in west Shewa zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Duan, G.; Tian, Y.-M.; Li, B.-F.; Yang, J.-F.; Liu, Z.-L.; Yuan, F.-Z.; Zhu, X.-Q.; Zou, F.-C. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pet dogs in Kunming, Southwest China. Parasit. Vectors 2012, 5, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Langoni, H.; Modolo, J.; Pezerico, S.; Silva, R.; Castro, A.; da Silva, A.; Padovani, C. Serological profile of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in apparently healthy dogs of the city of Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2006, 12, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jabur Lot Rodrigues, N.; Manzini, S.; Koeler Fonseca Pereira, J.; Siqueira Cruz, T.; Valente Bertozzo, T.; Nunes de Moraes, G.; Francisco Abbade, J.; Langoni, H. Atualizações e padrões da toxoplasmose humana e animal: Revisão de literatura. Vet. Zootec. 2022, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Havlik, O. Experimentálnĭ prenos toxoplasmosy klĭśtĕtem Ornithodorus moubata. Casopís Lékarů Českých 1951, 90. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14905455/ (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  55. Woke, P.A.; Jacobs, L.; Jones, F.E.; Melton, M.L. Experimental results on possible arthropod transmission of toxoplasmosis. J. Parasitol. 1953, 39, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tanaka, T.; Maeda, H.; Galay, R.L.; Boldbattar, D.; Umemiya-Shirafuji, R.; Suzuki, H.; Xuan, X.; Tsuji, N.; Fujisaki, K. Tick longicin implicated in the arthropod transmission of Toxoplasma gondii. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sroka, J.; Chmielewska-Badora, J.; Dutkiewicz, J. Ixodes ricinus as a potential vector of Toxoplasma gondii. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2003, 10, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Gidel, R.; Provost, A. Isolement de Toxoplasma gondii chez des ixodidés du genre Amblyomma naturellement infectés. Ann. l”Institut. Pasteur. 1965, 109, 613–616. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kim, J.Y.; Kwak, Y.S.; Lee, I.Y.; Yong, T.S. Molecular Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in Haemaphysalis Ticks in Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2020, 58, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dias, R.C.; Pasquali, A.K.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Pozzolo, E.M.; Chiyo, L.; Alban, S.M.; Fendrich, R.C.; Almeida, R.A.; Ferreira, F.P.; Caldart, E.T.; et al. Autochthonous canine visceral leishmaniasis cases occur in Paraná state since 2012: Isolation and identification of Leishmania infantum. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Veterinária 2020, 29, e009819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Pacheco, D.G.; do Carmo Moura, L.; Cambraia, R.P. Distribuição espacial dos casos de leishmaniose visceral humana e canina na área urbana do município de Virgem da Lapa, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rev. Cerrados 2022, 20, 347–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. de Souza Abreu, M.; Macedo Torquato de Siqueira, J.M.; Cleves da Silva Maia, J.; Barguil Nepomuceno, D.; Barros Araújo Lopes Luz, E.; Ferreira Mendes-Sousa, A. Aspectos epidemiológicos e distribuição espacial da leishmaniose visceral em Picos, Piauí-, Brasil. Saúde Coletiva (Barueri) 2021, 11, 5846–5857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Almeida, C.P.; Cavalcante, F.R.A.; de Oliveira Moreno, J.; Florêncio, C.M.G.D.; de Sousa Cavalcante, K.K.; Alencar, C.H. Visceral Leishmaniasis: Temporal and spatial distribution in Fortaleza, Ceará State, Brazil, 2007–2017. Epidemiol. Serv. Saude 2020, 29, e2019422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Almeida, A.D.B.P.F.D.; Mendonça, A.J.; Sousa, V.R.F. Prevalence and epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in dogs and humans in the city Cuiaba, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Cienc. Rural 2010, 40, 1610–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maia, C.S.; Pimentel, D.S.; Santana, M.A.; Oliveira, G.M.; Pedrosa, N.A.; Nascimento, L.A.; Faustino, M.A.G.; Alves, L.C. Análise espacial da Leishmaniose Visceral Americana no município de Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brasil. Hygeia-Rev. Bras. Geogr. Médica Saúde 2014, 10, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. de Marchi, M.N.A.; Caldart, E.T.; Martins, F.D.C.; Freire, R.L. Spatial analysis of leishmaniasis in Brazil: A systematized review. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2019, 61, e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Melo, H.A.; Rossoni, D.F.; Teodoro, U. Spatial distribution of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the state of Paraná, Brazil. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ikeda-Garcia, F.A.; Feitosa, M.M. Diagnostic methods of canine visceral leishmaniasis. Clínica Veterinária 2006, 11, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
  69. Valadas, S.; Minervino, A.H.H.; Lima, V.M.F.; Soares, R.M.; Ortolani, E.L.; Gennari, S.M. Occurrence of antibodies anti-Neospora caninum, anti-Toxoplasma gondii, and anti-Leishmania chagasi in serum of dogs from Pará State, Amazon, Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 107, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Morais, A.; Sousa, M.; Meireles, L.; Kesper, N.; Umezawa, E. Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Chagas disease among dogs in Araguaína, Tocantins. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2013, 22, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Troncarelli, M.Z.; Camargo, J.B.; Machado, J.G.; Lucheis, S.B.; Langoni, H. Leishmania spp. and/or Trypanosoma cruzi diagnosis in dogs from endemic and nonendemic areas for canine visceral leishmaniasis. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 164, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Dantas-Torres, F.; Nogueira, F.D.S.; Menz, I.; Tabanez, P.; da Silva, S.M.; Ribeiro, V.M.; Miró, G.; Cardoso, L.; Petersen, C.; Baneth, G.; et al. Vaccination against canine leishmaniasis in Brazil. Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cardoso, L.P.; Paiva, T.R.; Nogueira, L.M.V.; de Paula Souza E Guimarães, R.J.; Rodrigues, I.L.A.; André, S.R. Spatial distribution of Chagas disease and its correlation with health services. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP 2020, 54, e03565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sousa Júnior, A.D.S.; Palácios, V.R.D.C.M.; Miranda, C.D.S.; Da Costa, R.J.F.; Catete, C.P.; Chagasteles, E.J.; Pereira, A.L.R.R.; Gonçalves, N.V. Análise espaço-temporal da doença de chagas e seus fatores de risco ambientais e demográficos no município de Barcarena, Pará, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2017, 20, 742–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ferro, E.; Silva, A.M.; Sobral-Souza, T.; Vancine, M.H.; Muylaert, R.L.; de Abreu, A.P.; Pelloso, S.M.; de Barros Carvalho, M.D.; de Andrade, L.; Ribeiro, M.C.; et al. Spatial prediction of risk areas for vector transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in the State of Paraná, southern Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mareze, M.; Benitez, A.D.N.; Brandão, A.P.D.; Pinto-Ferreira, F.; Miura, A.C.; Martins, F.D.C.; Caldart, E.T.; Biondo, A.W.; Freire, R.L.; Mitsuka-Breganó, R.; et al. Socioeconomic vulnerability associated to Toxoplasma gondii exposure in southern Brazil. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Garcia Bahia-Oliveira, L.M.; Jones, J.L.; Azevedo-Silva, J.; Alves, C.C.F.; Oréfice, F.; Addiss, D.G. Highly endemic, waterborne toxoplasmosis in North Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rosso, F.; Les, J.T.; Agudelo, A.; Villalobos, C.; Chaves, J.A.; Tunubala, G.A.; Messa, A.; Remington, J.S.; Montoya, J.G. Prevalence of infection with Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women in Cali, Colombia, South America. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008, 78, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Alvarado-Esquivel, C.; Torres-Castorena, A.; Liesenfeld, O.; García-López, C.R.; Estrada-Martínez, S.; Sifuentes-Alvarez, A.; Marsal-Hernández, J.F.; Esquivel-Cruz, R.; Sandoval-Herrera, F.; Castañeda, J.A.; et al. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women in rural Durango, Mexico. J. Parasitol. 2009, 95, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Sroka, S.; Bartelheimer, N.; Winter, A.; Heukelbach, J.; Ariza, L.; Ribeiro, H.; Oliveira, F.A.; Queiroz, A.J.; Alencar, C., Jr.; Liesenfeld, O. Prevalence and risk factors of toxoplasmosis among pregnant women in Fortaleza, Northeastern Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010, 83, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lopes-Mori, F.M.; Mitsuka-Breganó, R.; Bittencourt, L.H.; Dias, R.C.; Gonçalves, D.D.; Capobiango, J.D.; Reiche, E.M.; Morimoto, H.K.; Freire, R.L.; Navarro, I.T. Gestational toxoplasmosis in Paraná State, Brazil: Prevalence of IgG antibodies and associated risk factors. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 17, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Olbera, A.V.G.; Fornazari, F.; Babboni, S.D.; Rossi, R.S.; Sevá, A.P.; Latosinski, G.S.; Silva, M.; Modolo, J.R.; Langoni, H. Cumulative incidence and spatial distribution of dogs exposed to Toxoplasma gondii. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2020, 29, e000820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Arruda, I.F.; Millar, P.R.; Barbosa, A.D.S.; Abboud, L.C.D.S.; dos Reis, I.C.; Moreira, A.S.D.C.; Guimarães, M.P.D.P.; Amendoeira, M.R.R. Toxoplasma gondii in domiciled dogs and cats in urban areas of Brazil: Risk factors and spatial distribution. Parasite 2021, 28, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shapiro, K. Climate and coastal habitat change: A recipe for a dirtier ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64, 1079–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liberg, O.; Sandell, M.; Pontier, D.; Natoli, E. Density spatial organisation and reproductive tactics in the domestic cat and other felids. Incollection 2000, 119–148. Available online: https://hal.science/hal-00427051/document (accessed on 15 May 2024).
  86. Heim, R.R. An overview of weather and climate extremes—Products and trends. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Semenza, J.C.; Suk, J.E. Vector-borne diseases and climate change: A European perspective. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365, fnx244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. World Health Organization. Global Vector Control Response 2017–2030; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  89. de Barros, R.A.M.; Torrecilhas, A.C.; Marciano, M.A.M.; Mazuz, M.L.; Pereira-Chioccola, V.L.; Fux, B. Toxoplasmosis in Human and Animals Around the World. Diagnosis and Perspectives in the One Health Approach. Acta Trop. 2022, 231, 106432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Miguel, D.C.; Brioschi, M.B.C.; Rosa, L.B.; Minori, K.; Grazzia, N. The impact of COVID-19 on neglected parasitic diseases: What to expect? Trends Parasitol. 2021, 37, 694–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tropicalmed 09 00143 g001
Figure 1. Location of human cases documented on the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN) from 2007 to 2020 for acquired, gestational, and congenital toxoplasmosis, leishmaniasis, and Chagas disease in residents of Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil.
Figure 1. Location of human cases documented on the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN) from 2007 to 2020 for acquired, gestational, and congenital toxoplasmosis, leishmaniasis, and Chagas disease in residents of Pinhais, Paraná, Brazil.
Tropicalmed 09 00143 g001
Tropicalmed 09 00143 g002
Figure 2. Spatial density of seropositive owners and dogs (kernel maps on the left) to T. gondii and historical records of human toxoplasmosis cases from 2007 to 2020.
Figure 2. Spatial density of seropositive owners and dogs (kernel maps on the left) to T. gondii and historical records of human toxoplasmosis cases from 2007 to 2020.
Tropicalmed 09 00143 g002
Table 1. Prevalence of IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies in owners.
Table 1. Prevalence of IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies in owners.
VariableResult/TiterN%95% CI
LowerUpper
SeropositivitySeropositive2014.89.821.8
Seronegative11585.278.290.2
RIFI16168058.491.9
643155.236.0
256150.923.6
Table 2. Prevalence of IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies in dogs.
Table 2. Prevalence of IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies in dogs.
VariableResult/TiterN%95% CI
LowerUpper
SeropositivitySeropositive139.775.816.0
Seronegative12090.2384.094.2
RIFI161076.9249.791.8
64323.088.250.3
Table 3. Logistic regression models for owner exposure to T. gondii as the dependent variable.
Table 3. Logistic regression models for owner exposure to T. gondii as the dependent variable.
VariablesMod1Mod2Mod3Mod4Mod5Mod6
(Intercept)0.9950.9950.9950.3780.1950.372
When it rains, water accumulates inside the house: Yes0.1150.1150.1180.103
Occurred at home: Not bitten by ticks0.9950.995
Occurred at home: Yes0.9950.995
Occurred after visiting the forest: Not bitten by ticks0.999
Occurred after visiting the forest: Yes0.999
Time of year: Not bitten by ticks0.9990.9990.995
Time of year: Do not know0.9920.9920.992
Consumes raw or pasteurized milk: Does not drink milk0.1560.1560.1230.0520.0580.058
Consume raw or pasteurized milk: Pasteurized and/or UHT0.2630.2630.1950.0610.0700.069
Frequent contact with sand or earth: Yes0.0410.0410.0570.0710.110
Mod = modifications.
Table 4. Logistic regression models for dog exposure to T. gondii as the dependent variable.
Table 4. Logistic regression models for dog exposure to T. gondii as the dependent variable.
VariablesMod1Mod2Mod3Mod4Mod5Mod6Mod7Mod8Mod9Mod10
(Intercept)0.3050.3550.7280.2340.1360.0160.005<0.001<0.001<0.001
Breed: mixed0.0180.0250.0290.0340.0450.0440.0640.0410.0710.097
Body score0.7240.7520.9170.9200.960
Number of ticks: 1 to 50.998
Number of ticks: 6 to 100.999
Number of ticks: >100.998
Tick collection locations: both0.9990.7270.8570.8220.8890.881
Tick collection locations: dog0.9980.5070.4050.3840.3080.281
Tick collection locations: no tick collection0.4150.4610.4620.4270.5940.574
Dog household location: backyard0.2140.1580.130
Dog household location: street0.9970.9970.997
Raw meat: yes0.0720.0680.1010.1410.1190.1150.1200.0930.093
Control ticks: yes0.3600.3890.2020.2330.2080.2060.234
Vaccination: both0.1420.2010.8800.950
Vaccination: antirabies0.1930.2460.9450.874
Vaccination: do not know0.8900.8830.3230.209
Vaccination: multipurpose0.9950.9950.9950.993
Deworming: do not know0.9980.998
Deworming: yes0.0990.117
Animal hygiene: dirty0.1440.1290.2250.2990.1440.1400.1060.094
Mod = modifications.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sohn-Hausner, N.; Correa, R.G.; Kmetiuk, L.B.; da Silva, E.C.; de Moraes, G.N.; Rocha, G.d.S.; Langoni, H.; Biondo, A.W. One Health Approach to Toxoplasmosis: Owner and Dog Seropositivity as Spatial Indicators of Risk Areas for Acquired, Gestational and Congenital Transmission. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2024, 9, 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9070143

AMA Style

Sohn-Hausner N, Correa RG, Kmetiuk LB, da Silva EC, de Moraes GN, Rocha GdS, Langoni H, Biondo AW. One Health Approach to Toxoplasmosis: Owner and Dog Seropositivity as Spatial Indicators of Risk Areas for Acquired, Gestational and Congenital Transmission. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2024; 9(7):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9070143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sohn-Hausner, Natacha, Ricardo Guedes Correa, Louise Bach Kmetiuk, Evelyn Cristine da Silva, Gustavo Nunes de Moraes, Gabrielle dos Santos Rocha, Helio Langoni, and Alexander Welker Biondo. 2024. "One Health Approach to Toxoplasmosis: Owner and Dog Seropositivity as Spatial Indicators of Risk Areas for Acquired, Gestational and Congenital Transmission" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 9, no. 7: 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9070143

APA Style

Sohn-Hausner, N., Correa, R. G., Kmetiuk, L. B., da Silva, E. C., de Moraes, G. N., Rocha, G. d. S., Langoni, H., & Biondo, A. W. (2024). One Health Approach to Toxoplasmosis: Owner and Dog Seropositivity as Spatial Indicators of Risk Areas for Acquired, Gestational and Congenital Transmission. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 9(7), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9070143

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop