Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic Consumption in Vanuatu before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2018 to 2021: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
No Evidence of Ntwetwe Virus Infections in Children Presenting to Kiboga Hospital, Uganda
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
TropicalMed
Volume 8
Issue 1
10.3390/tropicalmed8010022
tropicalmed-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Intestinal Parasitic Infections: A Population-Based Study in Phra Lap Sub-District, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen Province, Northeastern Thailand

by
Sirintip Boonjaraspinyo
1,
Thidarut Boonmars
2,*,
Nuttapon Ekobol
2,
Atchara Artchayasawat
2,
Pranee Sriraj
3,
Ratchadawan Aukkanimart
3,
Benjamabhorn Pumhirunroj
4,
Panupan Sripan
5,
Jiraporn Songsri
6,
Amornrat Juasook
7 and
Nadchanan Wonkchalee
8
1
Department of Community Medicine, Family Medicine and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
3
Department of Traditional Medicine, Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology ISAN Sakon Nakhon Campus, Sakon Nakhon 47160, Thailand
4
Program in Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon 47000, Thailand
5
College of Allied Health Science, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Samut Songkhram 75000, Thailand
6
Faculty of Science and Technology, Phranakorn Rajabhat University, Bangkok 10220, Thailand
7
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand
8
Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8010022
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 27 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Intestinal parasitic infections are still a crucial problem among communities in Northeast Thailand. Misuse of antiparasitic drugs and unhealthy food behaviors are known. This study aimed to explore the prevalence, behavioral health factors, and motivation for self-treatment of anti-parasitic drugs in this area. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Phra Lap sub-district, Mu Khon Kaen district, Khon Kaen province, Northeast Thailand, in 2016. A total of 419 participants were recruited to complete a self-administered questionnaire and stool examination. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the association between the risk factor and parasitic infection. Forty-two participants (10%; 95%CI 7.5–13.3) were positive for at least one parasite species. In this community, the most detected intestinal parasite was Opisthorchis viverrini (5.3%), followed by Strongyloides stercoralis (3.1%). A total of 67.5% of the participants had the experience of anti-parasitic drug treatment within previous 1 year, and “Often eat raw food” was the most common reason for the use of anti-parasitic drugs. On multivariate analysis, parasitic infections were significantly associated with male gender (ORadj. 2.42; 95%CI 1.00–5.85), age ≥ 60 years (ORadj. 7.55; 95%CI 1.60–35.76), and often consuming raw food of at least one type (ORadj. 2.37; 95%CI 1.03–5.44). Given these findings, correction of the dietary habit of eating raw fish/meat, which is the most important measure, and limitation of the use of anthelmintic treatment for individuals with stools positive for ova as well as emphasis on sanitary toilets will be implemented for the prevention and control of parasitic infection in endemic communities.

1. Introduction

Intestinal parasitic infection in the community is a neglected tropical disease, which is an important problem in developing countries. The global prevalence of soil-transmitted nematodes and Platyhelminthes remains high, about 30–807 million and 40–207 million, respectively [1]. The national survey of helminthiasis in Thailand showed that Opisthorchis (O.) viverrini, hookworm, and Strongyloides (S.) stercoralis remain important intestinal parasitic infections, particularly in the northeastern regions [2]. Infection with these parasites results in asymptomatic infection, but it is a chronic infection and interaction with the host immune response might contribute to human carcinogenesis and death if unrecognized. The fish-borne trematodes O. viverrini is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a group 1 carcinogenic to humans for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) [3]. Intestinal nematode S. stercoralis has a trend of causing lifelong infection and might develop into severe strongyloidiasis (hyperinfection syndrome or disseminated disease) in an immunocompromised host with a high mortality rate [4,5,6].
The prevention and control of intestinal parasitic infections in Thailand are focused on helminth infection. The Thai Department of Disease Control adopts active control in high-risk areas (parasite prevalence > 10%) by screening and treatment [7]. The mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminth control program was recommended for all individuals in high-risk populations, i.e., wherein the prevalence was at least 20% without individual diagnosis [8,9]. Annual administration was implemented in Thai endemic areas (prevalence > 20%), especially in the school-age population [10]. A single 400 mg dose of albendazole was recommended for mass drug administration in combination with improved sanitation, water supply, and health education. The national decade strategy for opisthorchiasis was launched from 2016 to 2025 by the Ministry of Public Health. This 10-year-long strategy aims to eliminate the burden of liver fluke and bile duct cancer [11,12]. This policy introduced the early screening of liver fluke for risk populations aged more than 15 years old. Praziquantel treatment is strictly used in the “test-and-treat strategy”. Mass drug administration of praziquantel is recommended by the WHO [13,14], once a year if the liver fluke prevalence exceeds 20%. Mass treatment with 40 mg/kg for a single dose shows an effective cure rate of 95.9% with fewer side effects [15,16]. There is no recommended self-treatment with praziquantel, and this drug is rarely available at local drug stores.
Although there is a policy to control intestinal parasitic infections and the community is developing rapidly, local people still have a culture similar to the past times. They have a food culture that includes the consumption of improperly cooked fish or meat. The people believe that eating raw food and then taking anti-parasitic medicine will prevent parasitic infections. Self-treatment with over-the-counter anti-parasitic drugs from local stores is a common practice for people in these communities. Frequent use of praziquantel was thought to contribute to a risk of CCA in terms of repetitively inducing bile duct inflammatory reactions to dead worms [17]. The number of praziquantel treatments may increase the risk of CCA [18,19]. Antiparasitic drug treatment without a food behavior change will maintain the infection due to repeated exposures or infection events. Therefore, the local culture and inappropriate treatment are leading to the spread of parasites. There are many studies about the prevalence and risk factors of single parasitic infections, especially O. viverrini [20,21,22], but the intestinal parasites in communities are diverse, including protozoans and helminths. Little is known about the reason leading to the self-treatment of anti-parasitic drugs in the community and the association between self- treatment and having a parasitic infection.
Therefore, this study aimed to explore the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection (helminth and protozoan), associated health behavioral factors, and the motivations for self-treatment of anti-parasitic drugs. These results will contribute to healthcare workers’ efforts to control and decrease the prevalence of parasite infection in communities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and June 2016. The study was conducted in the Phra Lap sub-district, Mueang Khon Kaen district, Khon Kaen province, northeastern Thailand. The study area was semi-rural communities and was located along the Chi River (Figure 1). The average temperature was 27.8 °C and the annual rainfall was 1500.8 mm [23]. The total population in this area was 22,187.

2.2. Study Population and Sample

Participants more than 20 years of age were eligible for this study. Participants who were pregnant or had received anti-parasitic treatment for the last 1 month were excluded. The sample size for the estimated prevalence was calculated based on the finite population proportion [24] Formula (1) below:
n = [NZ21−α/2 p(1 − p)]/[d2(N − 1) + Z21−α/2 p(1 − p)]
N: population size (N = 22,187)
Z21−α/2: standard normal distribution with confidence interval of 95% (Z = 1.96)
p: the assumed proportion was 37.2% reported in a previous study [25] (p = 0.372)
d2: acceptable difference 5% (d = 0.05)
The sample size was 354. The final sample size was 443 after adjusting for a 20% expected loss of subjects. All participants were informed about the aims, procedures, potential risks, and benefits. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. All protocols were approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand (ethical clearance no. HE581228). The participants were randomly selected in this study. Finally, a total of 419 participants returned stool specimens and questionnaires.

2.3. Parasitological Survey

Participants were instructed on the procedure for stool specimen collection and asked to provide a fresh morning stool in plastic containers. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic data, data on self-treatment of anti-parasitic drugs, and health behavioral factors associated with parasitic infections. Illiterate participants were interviewed personally. The questionnaire was checked for validity by three independent parasitological experts and tested for reliability using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient with a reliability value of 0.892. The questionnaire and sample containers were marked with the participant identification number. All stool samples were stored in an ice box and processed on the same day using formalin-ether concentration methods [26,27] at the Parasitology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University. The fecal samples were weighed for 2 g and mixed with 10 mL of normal saline. The mixed sample was transferred to a plastic funnel with 2 layers of gauze and filtered to a new 15 mL test tube.The fecal solution was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 2 min, the supernatant was discarded, 10 mL of normal saline was added, and the solution was centrifuged again for 2 to 3 rounds until the supernatant was a clearer color. Seven milliliters of 10% formalin was added and shaken. The formalin–fecal solution was stood for 5 min, then 3 mL of ethyl acetate was added and the solution was shaken vigorously. The solution was centrifuged again at 1500 rpm for 2 min. A wooden stick was used to de-plug the debris. The ethyl acetate, debris, and formalin were discarded. The processed specimen was sampled for two slides and examined by two parasitologists using a light microscope. Lugol’s iodine was used as the staining solution to detect intestinal protozoa and helminth from the specimen. A sample was considered positive if at least one parasite was detected in one slide. The participants who were infected with a parasite were treated with antiparasitic drugs and educated about the prevention of parasitic re-infection.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The prevalence of intestinal parasites, reason for antiparasitic drug consumption, and frequency of raw food consumption among participants were reported by descriptive statistics. The subjects were divided into two groups: (1) intestinal parasitic infection and (2) non-parasitic infection according to the stool examination. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between these two groups with health behavioral factors. The Mantel–Haenzsel test for trend was used to assess whether there was a difference in the trend of the proportions in the two groups with ordered categories [28,29]. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the association between independent variables and parasitic infection. The variables based on the results of the univariable analyses and scientifically relevant factors were included in the multivariable analysis [30]. The statistically significant factors were considered as p-values less than 0.05 and reported with a 95% confidence interval. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics 28.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and STATA10.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics

A total of 419 people in communities participated in this study (230 females and 186 males). The 40–59-year-old age group was best represented (48.5%). The participants had largely completed primary school (71.2%), and many were working as agriculturists (37.8%). Nearly half of the people in the community (46.1%) had comorbidity. The most common comorbidities found were hypertension (21.0%), followed by diabetes mellitus (13.8%), hepatitis (3.8%), and gastritis (3.3%). Nineteen percent of participants were smokers or ex-smokers, and 32.7% either drank alcohol or were ex-drinkers (Table 1).

3.2. Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infection

Of the 419 stool samples, 42 specimens (10%; 95%CI 7.5–13.3) were positive for at least one parasite species. The most common intestinal parasite in this community was Opisthorchis viverrini (5.3%), followed by Strongyloides stercoralis (3.1%), Echinostome spp., hookworm, Ascaris lumbricoides, and minute intestinal fluke were found in one case (0.2%) of each. The intestinal protozoa found in this study were Blastocystis hominis, Entamoeba histolytica, E. coli, and Giardia lamblia (Table 2).

3.3. Reason for Self-Treatment of Anti-Parasitic Drugs

Half of the participants (50.7%) had experienced parasitic infection screening, and from this group, 42% had a diagnosis of parasitic disease. A total of 81% of the participants in this community had the experience of anti-parasitic drug treatment. The most common reason for treatment with an anti-parasitic drug was “Often eat raw food” (37.7%), followed by “Feel uncomfortable stomach” (25.3%), “Self-treatment every year” (15.5%), and prevention from parasitic infection (14.1%). About 67.5% of the participants were treated with anti-parasitic drugs at least one time a year, and anti-parasitic drugs were commonly bought from pharmaceutical medicine stores (40.8%) and drugs sold on street markets (32.0%). More details are shown in Figure 2.

3.4. Sources of Food-Borne Parasitic Infections

The sources of food-borne parasitic infections in this community are shown in Figure 3. More than 30% of the participants in this area often consumed raw fermented fish followed by raw fermented pork (16.1%) and beef (11.4%). Fewer than 10% of the participants often consumed uncooked crab, shrimp, snail, dragonfly, and tadpoles. The traditional raw fish consumption and improperly cooked fish consumption in this area are shown in Figure 4c,d.
Table 3 summarizes the associations of all parasites and risk factors observed in univariable and multivariable regression analyses. The univariable analysis indicated that gender (ORcrude 3.08; 95%CI 1.55–6.12), smoking (ORcrude 4.36; 95%CI 2.05–9.30), alcohol consumption (ORcrude 3.05; 95%CI 1.51–6.16), and raw food consumption (ORcrude 2.65; 95%CI 1.23–5.73) were significantly associated with parasitic infection.
The multivariable analysis result was adjusted for age groups, gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, and raw food consumption. The significantly increased risks were observed in male participants for all parasitic infections (ORadj 2.42, 95%CI 1.00–5.85) compared to females. Those older than 60 years of age showed a higher prevalence than the younger age group, and the difference was statistically significant (ORadj 7.55; 95%CI 1.60–35.76). The odds of parasitic infection were 2.37-times more likely (ORadj 2.37; 95%CI 1.03–5.44) for participants who often consumed raw food of at least one type compared to those who never or sometimes consumed raw food.

4. Discussion

One in ten of the participants in this community were infected with a parasite. The most common parasite was O. viverrini, a group 1 carcinogenic to humans for CCA [3], followed by S. stercolaris. The prevalence in this area was lower than reported in 2013 [25] and similar to several studies reporting a prevalence (6.2–16.1%) in different settings in Thailand [22,31,32,33]. The prevalence of protozoan infection (0.8%) was lower than helminth infection, similar to previous studies [34,35,36]. These previous studies reported that the prevalence of protozoan infection was commonly Blastocystis hominis (2.19–4.0%) [34,36] or giardiasis (0.6–1.28%) [35,36], which both had a higher prevalence than this study. However, protozoan infection was indicated to occur through the feacal–oral transmission route in food or water and poor sanitation in this area, which correspond to the result that participants infrequently used a toilet for defecation (37.4%). The decrease in parasitic infection prevalence in this area might result from the screening programs, treatment of infected participants, and health education from the active control program by government campaigning and research projects including self-treatment with anthelmintics.
Among the participants, more than two-thirds of participants use parasitic drugs at least once a year to avoid parasitic infection. The most common reported reason to use drug treatment was “Often eat raw food”. This result showed that the villagers knew raw food consumption could result in infection with a parasite. Similar to the study by Chaisiri et al., it was shown that the villagers are aware of the risks of raw food consumption [34]. In our study, the participants usually bought the drug from a pharmacy, but some villagers (~30%) bought the medicine from a street market. Moreover, the participants administered self-treatment without knowing the species of parasitic infection. The common anti-parasitic drugs in local stores are albendazole or mebendazole, both single-dose treatments. This regimen is not effective against opisthorchiasis or strongyloidiasis which require praziquantel or ivermectin as standard treatments [37,38]. Therefore, the medicine might not be specific to the parasite with which they are infected, resulting in incomplete treatment from an ineffective drug type and suboptimal dose. This may lead to continued O. viverrini infection and an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma, especially in the northeastern part of Thailand, which is the endemic area of O. viverrini [39,40,41,42]. These results correspond to previous reports of inappropriate self-treatment of O.viverrini infection [43].
The factors associated with parasitic infections that were found in this study after analysis with confounder adjustment showed that being older than 60 years of age was associated with a higher chance of parasitic infection (by 7.55-fold) than younger age groups. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies, where the parasite infection rate increases with age [20,32]. Aging is a potential risk factor for parasitic infection. Protective immunity of the skin and gastrointestinal tract were weakened according to increased age [44,45,46]. Being an elderly person accompanied by comorbidity enhances the chance of being immunocompromised and thus susceptible to parasitic infection [47,48]. The culture of food preparation and food sharing is an important social factor for foodborne parasites in elder people. Misinformation about safe cooking and sharing of raw fish promote the risk of liver fluke infection in senior adults [49,50]. Additionally, males have a 2.4-fold increased risk of parasitic infection compared to females. This risk factor was also identified in previous studies [20,32,51,52]. This might be because males work outside of the home, especially in this area, where they mostly work as agriculturists and are likely to be in contact with the soil and not wearing shoes. The study by Wang et al. reported that males consume raw fish spicy salad 1.7 times compared to females because male participants believe that raw meat consumption provides power and strength. This finding highlights the misattribution of raw fish ingestion to masculinity [50]. Moreover, males working on farms might not properly cook their food and male fishers usually share raw fish dishes together with alcohol drinking [49], which can increase the risk of infection. Alcohol drinking and smoking were associated with parasitic infection in univariable analyses. Alcohol drinking and smoking increase the risk of O. viverrini infection [53,54]. Both first-hand and second-hand cigarette smoking promote the pathogenic immune response and/or weaken defensive immunity. This effect not only limits the airways but results in systemic pathology and lower systemic/mucosal protective immunity against parasitic infection [55]. Chronic alcohol consumption suppresses the protective immunity to parasitic infection. Alcohol stimulates the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal cortex axis to increase the production of cortisol. High levels of endogenous cortisol induce the polarization to Th1 dominant and induce Th2 cell apoptosis [56]. Moreover, alcohol can enhance the excystation of O. viverrini metacercaria [57]. The most important factor that is associated with an increased risk of parasite infection was often consuming raw food (at least one type, especially the consumption of raw fish or raw fermented fish). This area is located along the Chi River, where many people catch fish (cyprinid fish) for a living; there are many people who still had the behavior of consuming improperly cooked fish (Figure 4). This could account for the prevalence of O. viverrini infection in this area. Moreover, in this study, participants who often consumed raw food had a 2.37-fold higher rate of infection with parasites, similar to previous studies [21,31,33]. Additionally, the result of this study did not find an association between parasitic infection and the number of times a parasitic drug was used in 1 year. This finding indicated that self-treatment is not effective unless a behavioral change in raw food consumption and a proper regimen for parasitic control in endemic areas were taken up.
The findings of this study suggested that the risk factors for parasitic infection were (1) male gender, (2) greater than 60 years of age, and (3) frequent consumption of raw food (of at least one type of food). These risk factors might be valuable in a pre-screening for villagers screening themselves and village health volunteers for pre-screening the people before stool examination in communities. After stool examination, those who are found to be infected with parasites must be informed and treated to control parasitic diseases in the endemic area. The villagers need to be made aware that self-treatment does not prevent intestinal parasitic infections and in the case of opisthorchiasis may carry an additional risk of cholangiocarcinoma, thus emphasizing the importance of adequate cooking of fish and meat products.
A limitation of this study is that it used a cross-sectional study for risk factor analysis, which might affect the causal relationships between the risk pattern and parasitic infection.

5. Conclusions

The current study suggested that intestinal parasitic infection is still a problem in this area. This research highlights that the risk factors of parasitic infection were (1) male gender, (2) being 60 years of age or older, and (3) often consuming raw food. The screening programs will be implemented to prevent and control intestinal parasite infections in endemic communities. Furthermore, health education is needed for people of all age groups, particularly males, who have a higher risk of consuming improperly cooked food. This effort should focus on self-treatment to correct misunderstandings about anti-parasitic drug use. Effective treatment requires proper diagnosis and management, which cannot be achieved through individual empiric treatment practice (self-treatment). Therefore, developing prevention programs in the local communities should focus on these findings to reduce the prevalence of parasitic infections and reduce the risk of cholangiocarcinoma in these communities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B. and T.B.; methodology, S.B.; validation, T.B., S.B. and N.E.; formal analysis, S.B.; data collection, A.A., P.S. (Pranee Sriraj), R.A., P.S. (Panupan Sripan), J.S., A.J., N.W. and B.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B.; writing—review and editing, N.E.; supervision, T.B.; project administration, S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was granted by the Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand (Grant Number IN59162).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand (ethical clearance no. HE581228; 13 August 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, for their assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hotez, P.J.; Brindley, P.J.; Bethony, J.M.; King, C.H.; Pearce, E.J.; Jacobson, J. Helminth infections: The great neglected tropical diseases. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 1311–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wongsaroj, T.; Nithikathkul, C.; Rojkitikul, W.; Nakai, W.; Royal, L.; Rammasut, P. National survey of helminthiasis in Thailand. Asian Biomed. 2014, 8, 779–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Biological agents. Volume 100 B. A review of human carcinogens. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. 2012, 100, 1–441. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan, F.L.Y.; Kennedy, B.; Nelson, R. Fatal Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome in an immunocompetent adult with review of the literature. Intern. Med. J. 2018, 48, 872–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Page, W.; Judd, J.A.; Bradbury, R.S. The unique life cycle of Strongyloides stercoralis and implications for public health action. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ramanathan, R.; Nutman, T. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in the immunocompromised host. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2008, 10, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Bureau of General Communicable Disease, Ministry of Public Health. Parasitic Disease Control in High-Risk Areas. 2003. Available online: http://e-lib.ddc.moph.go.th/pdf/eb317.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2022).
  8. Savioli, L.; Albonico, M.; Daumerie, D.; Lo, N.C.; Stothard, J.R.; Asaolu, S.; Tchuem Tchuente, L.A.; Anderson, R.M. Review of the 2017 WHO Guideline: Preventive chemotherapy to control soil-transmitted helminth infections in at-risk population groups. An opportunity lost in translation. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. World Health Organization. Guideline: Preventive Chemotherapy to Control Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in at-Risk Population Groups. 2017. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/258983 (accessed on 9 December 2022).
  10. Bureau of General Communicable Disease, Ministry of Public Health. Guidelines for Helminthiasis Control under the Royal Initiative Projects of Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn: For Public Health Personnel. 2018. Available online: http://dn.core-website.com/public/dispatch_upload/backend/core_dispatch_190145_3.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2022).
  11. Department of disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. Decade Strategic Plan to Eradicate Liver Fluke Problem and Bile Duct Cancer 2016–2025; Printing Office Welfare Organization Veterans under Royal Patronage: Bangkok, Thailand, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Khuntikeo, N.; Titapun, A.; Loilome, W.; Yongvanit, P.; Thinkhamrop, B.; Chamadol, N.; Boonmars, T.; Nethanomsak, T.; Andrews, R.H.; Petney, T.N.; et al. Current Perspectives on Opisthorchiasis Control and Cholangiocarcinoma Detection in Southeast Asia. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Crellen, T.; Sithithaworn, P.; Pitaksakulrat, O.; Khuntikeo, N.; Medley, G.F.; Hollingsworth, T.D. Towards Evidence-based Control of Opisthorchis viverrini. Trends Parasitol. 2021, 37, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. World Health Organization. Report of the WHO Expert Consultation on Foodborne Trematode Infections and Taeniasis/Cysticercosis, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic 12–16 October 2009. 2011. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/75209 (accessed on 9 December 2022).
  15. Vivatanasesth, P.; Sornmani, S.; Schelp, F.P.; Impand, P.; Sitabutra, P.; Preuksaraj, S.; Harinasuta, C. Mass treatment of opisthorchiasis in Northeast Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1982, 13, 609–613. [Google Scholar]
  16. Qian, M.B.; Patel, C.; Palmeirim, M.S.; Wang, X.; Schindler, C.; Utzinger, J.; Zhou, X.N.; Keiser, J. Efficacy of drugs against clonorchiasis and opisthorchiasis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe 2022, 3, e616–e624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pinlaor, S.; Prakobwong, S.; Hiraku, Y.; Kaewsamut, B.; Dechakhamphu, S.; Boonmars, T.; Sithithaworn, P.; Pinlaor, P.; Ma, N.; Yongvanit, P.; et al. Oxidative and nitrative stress in Opisthorchis viverrini-infected hamsters: An indirect effect after praziquantel treatment. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008, 78, 564–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kamsa-Ard, S.; Luvira, V.; Pugkhem, A.; Luvira, V.; Thinkhamrop, B.; Suwanrungruang, K.; Bhudhisawasdi, V. Association between praziquantel treatment and cholangiocarcinoma: A hospital-based matched case-control study. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Luvira, V.; Kamsa-Ard, S.; Kamsa-Ard, S.; Luvira, V.; Srisuk, T.; Pugkhem, A.; Pairojkul, C.; Bhudhisawasdi, V. Association between repeated praziquantel treatment and papillary, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann. Hepatol. 2018, 17, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chaiputcha, K.; Promthet, S.; Bradshaw, P. Prevalence and risk factors for infection by Opisthorchis viverrini in an urban area of Mahasarakham province, Northeast Thailand. Asian Pac. J. Cancer. Prev. 2015, 16, 4173–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chudthaisong, N.; Promthet, S.; Bradshaw, P. Risk factors for Opisthorchis viverrini infection in Nong Khai province, Thailand. Asian Pac. J. Cancer. Prev. 2015, 16, 4593–4596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Perakanya, P.; Ungcharoen, R.; Worrabannakorn, S.; Ongarj, P.; Artchayasawat, A.; Boonmars, T.; Boueroy, P. Prevalence and risk factors of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in Sakon Nakhon province, Thailand. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Thai Meteorological Development Bureau, Climatological Center. Annual Weather Summary over Thailand in 2016. Climatological Center: Bangkok, Thailand, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wayne, W.D. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in The Health Science, 6th ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 180–181. [Google Scholar]
  25. Boonjaraspinyo, S.; Boonmars, T.; Kaewsamut, B.; Ekobol, N.; Laummaunwai, P.; Aukkanimart, R.; Wonkchalee, N.; Juasook, A.; Sriraj, P. A cross-sectional study on intestinal parasitic infections in rural communities, northeast Thailand. Korean J. Parasitol. 2013, 51, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Elkins, D.B.; Haswell-Elkins, M.R.; Mairiang, E.; Mairiang, P.; Sithithaworn, P.; Kaewkes, S.; Bhudhisawasdi, V.; Uttaravichien, T. A high frequency of hepatobiliary disease and suspected cholangiocarcinoma associated with heavy Opisthorchis viverrini infection in a small community in north-east Thailand. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. 1990, 84, 715–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Intapan, P.; Maleewong, W.; Wongsaroj, T.; Singthong, S.; Morakote, N. Comparison of the quantitative formalin ethyl acetate concentration technique and agar plate culture for diagnosis of human strongyloidiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 1932–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hazra, A.; Gogtay, N. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups—Categorical Variables. Indian J. Dermatol. 2016, 61, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. IBM SPSS Statistics Support. Mantel-Haenszel Test for Trend Available in Crosstabs. 2020. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/418705 (accessed on 9 December 2022).
  30. Hosmer, D.W.; Lemeshow, S. Model-building strategies and methods for logistic regression. In Applied Logistic Regression; Barnett, V., Cressie, N.A.C., Fisher, N.I., Johnstone, I.M., Kadane, J.B., Kendall, D.G., Scott, D.W., Silverman, B.W., Smith, A.F.M., Teugels, J.L., et al., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 89–151. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaewpitoon, S.J.; Loyd, R.A.; Kaewpitoon, N. A cross-sectional survey of intestinal helminthiases in rural communities of Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. J. Med. Assoc. Thai 2015, 98, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  32. Suntaravitun, P.; Dokmaikaw, A. Prevalence of intestinal parasites and associated risk factors for infection among rural communities of Chachoengsao Province, Thailand. Korean J. Parasitol. 2018, 56, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suwannahitatorn, P.; Webster, J.; Riley, S.; Mungthin, M.; Donnelly, C.A. Uncooked fish consumption among those at risk of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in central Thailand. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaisiri, K.; Jollivet, C.; Della Rossa, P.; Sanguankiat, S.; Wattanakulpanich, D.; Lajaunie, C.; Binot, A.; Tanita, M.; Rattanapikul, S.; Sutdan, D.; et al. Parasitic infections in relation to practices and knowledge in a rural village in Northern Thailand with emphasis on fish-borne trematode infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 2018, 147, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Nuchprayoon, S.; Siriyasatien, P.; Kraivichian, K.; Porksakorn, C.; Nuchprayoon, I. Prevalence of parasitic infections among Thai patients at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2002, 85 (Suppl. 1), S415–S423. [Google Scholar]
  36. Punsawad, C.; Phasuk, N.; Bunratsami, S.; Thongtup, K.; Siripakonuaong, N.; Nongnaul, S. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection and associated risk factors among village health volunteers in rural communities of southern Thailand. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. CDC. Parasites—Opisthorchis Infection: Resources for Health Professionals; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/opisthorchis/health_professionals/index.html (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  38. CDC. Parasites—Strongyloides: Resources for Health Professionals; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/strongyloides/health_professionals/index.html (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  39. Charoensuk, L.; Ribas, A.; Chedtabud, K.; Prakobwong, S. Infection rate of Opisthorchis viverrini metacercariae in cyprinoid fish from the markets and its association to human opisthorchiasis in the local community in the Northeast Thailand. Acta Trop. 2022, 225, 106216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haswell-Elkins, M.R.; Satarug, S.; Elkins, D.B. Opisthorchis viverrini infection in Northeast Thailand and its relationship to cholangiocarcinoma. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1992, 7, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jongsuksuntigul, P.; Imsomboon, T. Opisthorchiasis control in Thailand. Acta Trop. 2003, 88, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sripa, B.; Tangkawattana, S.; Laha, T.; Kaewkes, S.; Mallory, F.F.; Smith, J.F.; Wilcox, B.A. Toward integrated opisthorchiasis control in northeast Thailand: The Lawa project. Acta Trop. 2015, 141, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Prakobwong, S.; Gunnula, W.; Chaipibool, S.; Nimala, B.; Sangthopo, J.; Sirivetthumrong, N.; Ribas, A. Epidemiology of Opisthorchis viverrini in an endemic area of Thailand, an integrative approach. Helminthologia 2017, 54, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Engroff, P.; Ely, L.S.; Silva, A.B.; Viegas, K.; Loureiro, F.; Gome, I.; DeCarli, G.A. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in the elderly enrolled in the Family Health Strategy in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Geriatr. Gerontol. Aging 2016, 10, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Feldmeier, H.; Heukelbach, J. Epidermal parasitic skin diseases: A neglected category of poverty-associated plagues. Bull. World Health Organ. 2009, 87, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Siagian, F.E.; Maryanti, E. What Makes the Elderly Prone to Parasitic Infection? Asian J. Res. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Almugadam, B.S.; Ibrahim, M.K.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.M.; Wang, C.H.; Shao, C.Y.; Ren, B.W.; Tang, L. Association of urogenital and intestinal parasitic infections with type 2 diabetes individuals: A comparative study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Machado, E.R.; Matos, N.O.; Rezende, S.M.; Carlos, D.; Silva, T.C.; Rodrigues, L.; Almeida, M.J.R.; de Oliveira, M.R.F.; Muniz-Junqueira, M.I.; Gurgel-Goncalves, R. Host-Parasite Interactions in Individuals with Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Result in Higher Frequency of Ascaris lumbricoides and Giardia lamblia in Type 2 Diabetic Individuals. J. Diabetes Res. 2018, 2018, 4238435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Saenna, P.; Hurst, C.; Echaubard, P.; Wilcox, B.A.; Sripa, B. Fish sharing as a risk factor for Opisthorchis viverrini infection: Evidence from two villages in north-eastern Thailand. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2017, 6, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wang, Y.C.; Grundy-Warr, C.; Namsanor, J.; Kenney-Lazar, M.; Tang, C.J.Y.; Goh, L.Y.W.; Chong, Y.C.; Sithithaworn, P.; Ngonkum, S.; Khuntikeo, N. Masculinity and misinformation: Social dynamics of liver fluke infection risk in Thailand. Parasitol. Int. 2021, 84, 102382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sriamporn, S.; Pisani, P.; Pipitgool, V.; Suwanrungruang, K.; Kamsa-ard, S.; Parkin, D.M. Prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection and incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2004, 9, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thaewnongiew, K.; Singthong, S.; Kutchamart, S.; Tangsawad, S.; Promthet, S.; Sailugkum, S.; Wongba, N. Prevalence and risk factors for Opisthorchis viverrini infections in upper Northeast Thailand. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 6609–6612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Saiyachak, K.; Tongsotsang, S.; Saenrueang, T.; Moore, M.A.; Promthet, S. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Opisthorchis viverrini infection in Khammouane Province, Lao PDR. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2016, 17, 1589–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yeoh, K.W.; Promthet, S.; Sithithaworn, P.; Kamsaard, S.; Parkin, D.M. Re-examination of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in Northeast Thailand. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 16, 3413–3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Qiu, F.; Liang, C.L.; Liu, H.; Zeng, Y.Q.; Hou, S.; Huang, S.; Lai, X.; Dai, Z. Impacts of cigarette smoking on immune responsiveness: Up and down or upside down? Oncotarget 2017, 8, 268–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Teixeira, M.C.; Pacheco, F.T.; Souza, J.N.; Silva, M.L.; Ines, E.J.; Soares, N.M. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in alcoholic patients. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 4872473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sriraj, P.; Aukkanimart, R.; Boonmars, T.; Wonkchalee, N.; Juasook, A.; Sudsarn, P.; Pairojkul, C.; Waraasawapati, S.; Pinlaor, S. Alcohol and alkalosis enhance excystation of Opisthorchis viverrini metacercariae. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 2397–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tropicalmed 08 00022 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of the study area at Phra Lap sub-district, Mueang Khon Kaen district, Khon Kaen Province, northeastern Thailand.
Figure 1. Location of the study area at Phra Lap sub-district, Mueang Khon Kaen district, Khon Kaen Province, northeastern Thailand.
Tropicalmed 08 00022 g001
Tropicalmed 08 00022 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Percentages of the reasons for treatment with an anti-parasitic drug; (b) source of anti-parasitic drugs. Note: participants could choose more than 1 answer.
Figure 2. (a) Percentages of the reasons for treatment with an anti-parasitic drug; (b) source of anti-parasitic drugs. Note: participants could choose more than 1 answer.
Tropicalmed 08 00022 g002
Tropicalmed 08 00022 g003 550
Figure 3. Percentage of raw food consumption among participants.
Figure 3. Percentage of raw food consumption among participants.
Tropicalmed 08 00022 g003
Tropicalmed 08 00022 g004 550
Figure 4. (a,b) The community located along the river where people fished for a living; (c,d) the traditional raw or improperly cooked fish consumption in this area.
Figure 4. (a,b) The community located along the river where people fished for a living; (c,d) the traditional raw or improperly cooked fish consumption in this area.
Tropicalmed 08 00022 g004
Table
Table 1. Socio-demographic data and health behavioral factors related to parasitic infection.
Table 1. Socio-demographic data and health behavioral factors related to parasitic infection.
VariablesTotalParasitic InfectionNon-Parasitic Infectionχ2p-Value
n(%)n(%)
Age
20–39562(3.6)54(96.4)3.464 b0.063
40–5920020(10.0)180(90.0)
≥6015720(12.7)137(87.3)
Gender
Male18629(15.6)157(84.4)11.192 a0.001 *
Female23013(5.7)217(94.3)
Education
Primary school28934(11.8)255(88.2)1.813 b0.178
Secondary school1057(6.7)98(93.3)
Bachelor degree 121(8.3)11(91.7)
Occupation
Agriculturist14421(14.6)123(85.4)4.078 a0.253
Labor938(8.6)85(91.4)
Merchant634(6.3)59(93.7)
Other848(9.5)76(90.5)
Comorbidity
No22621(9.3)205(90.7)0.291 a0.589
Yes19321(10.9)172(89.1)
Smoke
Yes 5013(26.0)37(74.0)18.240 a<0.001 *
Ex-smoker255(20.0)20(80.0)
No32224(7.5)298(92.5)
Alcohol drinker
Yes 9317(18.3)76(81.7)10.859 a0.004 *
Ex-drinker426(14.3)36(85.7)
No27819(6.8)259(93.2)
Number of times a parasitic drug was used in 1 year
≥2 time485(10.4)43(89.6)0.003 b0.955
1 time11210(8.9)102(91.1)
0 time778(10.4)69(89.6)
Raw food consumption (at least one type of food)
Often22133(14.9)188(85.1)6.561 a0.010 *
Never or sometimes 1459(6.2)136(93.8)
Shoe-wearing outside the house and boot-wearing during farm work
Sometimes15420(13.0)134(87.0)1.109 a0.292
Always23022(9.6)208(90.4)
Defecation into a toilet at home and on the farm
Sometimes13020(15.4)110(84.6)3.664 a0.056
Always24822(8.9)226(91.1)
* p < 0.05, a Pearson Chi-square, b Mantel–Haenzsel test for trend.
Table
Table 2. The intestinal parasitic infections among participants in the community.
Table 2. The intestinal parasitic infections among participants in the community.
Type of Intestinal Parasitic InfectionFrequencyPercentage
Helminth
 Opisthorchis viverrini
22/419
5.3
 Strongyloides stercoralis13/4193.1
 Hookworm1/4190.2
 Ascaris lumbricoides1/4190.2
 Echinostoma spp.1/4190.2
 Minute intestinal fluke1/4190.2
Protozoan
 Giardia lamblia1/4190.2
 Balantidium coli1/4190.2
  Entamoeba coli1/4190.2
 Blastocystis hominis *1/4190.2
* 1 participant had multiple infections of Opisthorchis viverrini and Blastocystis hominis.
Table
Table 3. The univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis for parasitic infection in the community.
Table 3. The univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis for parasitic infection in the community.
VariablesORcrude(95%CI)p-ValueORadj(95%CI)p-Value
Gender
Male3.08(1.55–6.12)0.001 *2.42(1.00–5.85)0.049 *
Female1 1
Age
≤391 1
40–593(0.68–13.25)0.1474.09(0.89–18.76)0.070
≥603.94(0.89–17.44)0.0717.55(1.60–35.76)0.011 *
Educational status
Primary school1.47(0.18–11.72)0.718
Secondary school0.79(0.09–6.99)0.829
Bachelor degree 1
Occupation
Agriculturist1.88(0.98–3.60)0.058
Others1
Smoker
Yes 4.36(2.05–9.30)<0.001 *2(0.74–5.44)0.174
Ex-smoker3.1(1.07–9.00)0.037 *1.52(0.37–6.21)0.556
No1 1
Alcohol drinker
Yes 3.05(1.51–6.16)0.002 *1.158(0.65–3.84)0.318
Ex-drinker2.27(0.85–6.06)0.1011.14(0.31–4.12)0.843
No1 1
Number of times a parasitic drug was used in 1 year
≥2 times1.00(0.31–3.27)0.996
1 time0.85(0.32–2.25)0.846
0 time1
Raw food consumption (at least one type of food)
Often 2.65(1.23–5.73)0.013*2.37(1.03–5.44)0.041 *
Never or some times 1 1
Shoe-wearing outside the house and boot-wearing during farm work
Sometimes1.41(0.74–2.68)0.294
Always1
Defecation into a toilet at home and on the farm
Sometimes1.87(0.98–3.57)0.058
Always1
* p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boonjaraspinyo, S.; Boonmars, T.; Ekobol, N.; Artchayasawat, A.; Sriraj, P.; Aukkanimart, R.; Pumhirunroj, B.; Sripan, P.; Songsri, J.; Juasook, A.; et al. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Intestinal Parasitic Infections: A Population-Based Study in Phra Lap Sub-District, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen Province, Northeastern Thailand. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8010022

AMA Style

Boonjaraspinyo S, Boonmars T, Ekobol N, Artchayasawat A, Sriraj P, Aukkanimart R, Pumhirunroj B, Sripan P, Songsri J, Juasook A, et al. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Intestinal Parasitic Infections: A Population-Based Study in Phra Lap Sub-District, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen Province, Northeastern Thailand. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8010022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boonjaraspinyo, Sirintip, Thidarut Boonmars, Nuttapon Ekobol, Atchara Artchayasawat, Pranee Sriraj, Ratchadawan Aukkanimart, Benjamabhorn Pumhirunroj, Panupan Sripan, Jiraporn Songsri, Amornrat Juasook, and et al. 2023. "Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Intestinal Parasitic Infections: A Population-Based Study in Phra Lap Sub-District, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen Province, Northeastern Thailand" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 8, no. 1: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8010022

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop