Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018–2019
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of Spatial Video to Map Dynamic and Challenging Environments: A Case Study of Cholera Risk in the Mujoga Relief Camp, D.R.C.
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Affecting the Transition from Paper to Digital Data Collection for Mobile Tuberculosis Active Case Finding in Low Internet Access Settings in Pakistan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Community Engagement and Geographic Information Systems to Address COVID-19 Vaccination Disparities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
TropicalMed
Volume 7
Issue 8
10.3390/tropicalmed7080202
tropicalmed-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using Routinely Collected Health Records to Identify the Fine-Resolution Spatial Patterns of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Rwanda

by
Elias Nyandwi
1,
Tom Veldkamp
2,
Sherif Amer
2,*,
Eugene Ruberanziza
3,
Nadine Rujeni
4 and
Ireneé Umulisa
3
1
Centre for Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, KN 73 Street, (Avenue de l’Armée), Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
2
Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
3
Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases Unit, KG 644 Street, Kimihurura, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
4
School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, KN 73 Street, (Avenue de l’Armée), Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7(8), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080202
Submission received: 13 July 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 16 August 2022 / Published: 22 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geospatial Health (GeoHealth): Current Trends, Methods, and Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background. Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are parasitic diseases with significant public health impact. Analysis is generally based on cross-sectional prevalence surveys; outcomes are mostly aggregated to larger spatial units. However, recent research demonstrates that infection levels and spatial patterns differ between STH species and tend to be localized. Methods. Incidence data of STHs including roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides), whipworm (Trichuris trichiura) and hookworms per primary health facility for 2008 were linked to spatially delineated primary health center service areas. Prevalence data per district for individual and combined STH infections from the 2008 nationwide survey in Rwanda were also obtained. Results. A comparison of reported prevalence and incidence data indicated significant positive correlations for roundworm (R2 = 0.63) and hookworm (R2 = 0.27). Weak positive correlations were observed for whipworm (R2 = 0.02) and the three STHs combined (R2 = 0.10). Incidence of roundworm and whipworm were found to be focalized with significant spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I > 0: 0.05–0.38 and p ≤ 0.03), with (very) high incidence rates in some focal areas. In contrast, hookworm incidence is ubiquitous and randomly distributed (Moran’s I > 0: 0.006 and p = 0.74) with very low incidence rates. Furthermore, an exploratory regression analysis identified relationships between helminth infection cases and potential environmental and socio-economic risk factors. Conclusions. Findings show that the spatial distribution of STH incidence is significantly associated with soil properties (sand proportion and pH), rainfall, wetlands and their uses, population density and proportion of rural residents. Identified spatial patterns are important for guiding STH prevention and control programs.

1. Introduction

Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) infect humans through their ingestion of parasite eggs (Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura) or via larvae that can penetrate the skin of humans (hookworm). STH infection mainly occurs in areas with moist and warm climates and poor sanitation and hygiene [1]. The burden of STH infections is well-known in Rwanda. After malaria, STH infections cause the highest morbidity and have considerable public health and economic impacts [2]. The countrywide mapping of STH conducted in 2008 and results from a simulation by the WHO in the same period [3] demonstrated that 27 out 30 districts in Rwanda have a STH prevalence above 50%. The 2008 prevalence mapping is based upon a cross-sectional survey at primary schools using the Kato–Katz technique [4]. Four or six schools are sampled per district, and data are aggregated to district level. The resulting STH prevalence per district guided subsequent massive drug administration (MDA) campaigns and other control efforts [5].
In 2005, the Rwandan Ministry of Health and its partners, including UNICEF, launched a biannual campaign called “Integrated Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Week”, including mass deworming with mebendazole for children aged 12 at 59 months, vitamin A supplementation for children aged 6 to 59 months and the distribution of family planning methods and other interventions. Since the establishment of the National Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) Program in mid-2007, efforts have been made to map and integrate NTDs (including STH) into the existing health system, including DHS2/HMIS, and to control them. In addition to children aged 12 to 59 months, biannual mass deworming targeting school aged children (5 to 15 years old) has been integrated into MCH week campaigns since 2008, after an initial mapping of STH (and schistosomiasis). Mebendazole or albendazole was used to treat soil-transmitted helminthiasis depending on the availability of donations [6].
The follow-up national remapping took place in 2014 [7,8]. The active monitoring of the spatial patterns of STH infection is needed to identify areas of high transmission, assess the impact of interventions and guide future control measures. Therefore, an efficient and inexpensive approach is needed that can be used to monitor the spatial distribution of STH transmission across space and over time.
The prevalence study conducted in 2008 has three main limitations. Firstly, the district-level mapping approach is too crude to capture the considerable geographic variability of biophysical and socio-economic conditions associated with STH transmission. Secondly, the existing STH prevalence inventory primarily targets school-aged children, thus not considering pre-school aged children, who are also much affected. Thirdly, differences in STHs pathogenicity and mode of transmission [9] are not considered. Prior research in countries neighbouring Rwanda has demonstrated that different species of STH infections have very different spatial patterns of transmission [10,11]. Additionally, Clements et al. [12] identified different spatial patterns for different STH species in the East African Great Lakes region, with ubiquitous hookworm infection and highly focal prevalence patterns of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura.
STH infections are associated with biophysical features that influence egg and larval survival [13], and socio-economic factors such as inadequate sanitation, hygiene, and certain behavioural factors (e.g., defecation in the bush, reliance on traditional medicine) can facilitate transmission [14]. The latter may differ from one to another STH as they have different life cycles and transmission trajectories [15].
In Rwanda, health records on confirmed STH infections are routinely collected at the primary health facility level. When combined with small-area population data, the recorded case data can be used to estimate STH incidence rates for small geographic units, which we term Health Facility Service Areas (HFSAs). The approach used for delineating HFSAs is outlined in our earlier paper [16]. An important benefit of using incidence rates at the HFSA level is that detailed spatial patterns of STH transmission can be identified. We see the use of the HFSA-level incidence data as complementary to prevalence-based studies.
This research first investigates if incidence data can be used to identify the spatial distributions of STH transmission for individual helminth species as well as for combined STH infection. Second, it assesses how spatial variations in STH transmission are associated with environmental (physical and socio-economic) risk factors. Conducting such a geographically fine resolution assessment is novel as well as essential for a better understanding of the spatial variations in STH incidence in Rwanda and can contribute to geographically targeted future control efforts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Study Area and Health Facilities

Rwanda is characterized by diverse biophysical conditions, from lowland eastern savannas and hilly areas in the central-southern region to the western and north-western mountains. Rwanda has a temperate tropical highland climate, with little variation in the annual average temperature (20 °C). Rainfall varies with the topography and is characterized by with two rainy seasons.
Rwanda has around 11 million inhabitants, on average around 435 inhabitants per km2 [17], with a decentralized health facility structure. The primary health facility is the lowest level of the current health system hierarchy through which the health needs of the population are addressed [18]. Around 450 functioning primary health facilities are grouped into 367 HFSAs. (Figure 1). The approach used for delineating HFSA boundaries is explained in Nyandwi et al. [16].

2.2. Data Collection and Structuring

STH incidence and prevalence data. Confirmed cases of STH infection including roundworm (A. lumbricoides), whipworm (T. trichiura) and hookworm recorded at the primary health facility level for 2008 were obtained from the Rwanda Biomedical Centre—Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases division (RBC/M&OPD). Prevalence data per district for individual and combined STH infections from the 2008 nationwide survey were also obtained from RBC/M&OPD. The year 2008 was selected for two reasons. First, it corresponds with the period of the nationwide school-based survey and mapping of STH prevalence (2008). Second, HFSAs can be accurately delineated given the widespread implementation of community-based health insurance, which determines which health facility the inhabitants of a given village or cell should attend when seeking care.
Population and general spatial data. Demographic data and socio-economic conditions per administrative sector for 2008 were obtained from the Integrated Household Living Conditions Surveys (EICV 2 & EICV 3) and the annual population growth rate reported by National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. The following socio-economic variables were considered: (i) proportion of rural to urban area, (ii) population density [19], percentage of households with (un-) improved water source, (iii) percentage of households with access to improved sanitation, and (iv) education level (percentage of persons with six years basic education and persons with twelve years basic education).
General spatial data (e.g., lakes, islands, parks, roads) were obtained from the Centre for GIS and Remote Sensing of the University of Rwanda (CGIS-UR).
Environmental factors. Several variables were considered as potential risk factors for STH transmission (see Table 1). Three topographical parameters (elevation, slope and terrain shape index) were generated from a high-resolution digital terrain model produced from 2008 aerial photography [20,21]. Soil parameters (pH, clay and sand percentage) were extracted from the soil geo-database of Rwanda, the outcome of a semi-detailed soil survey of 1833 soil profiles spread over the country [22].
The annual averages of the climatic data (e.g., temperature, rainfall), measured at 183 weather stations from 1950 to 2010, were interpolated using the thin-plate smoothing spline algorithm as proposed by Hijmans et al. [23]. The boundaries of lakes, wetlands, and main rivers, produced by the Rwanda Environment Management Authority [24] and further adjusted by Nyandwi et al. [25], were also available for this study. For each HFSA, the following proxy factors were generated: (i) area and percentage of wetland and lake, (ii) wetland use (percentage of area covered by natural vegetation, (iii) total area of wetlands used for intensive irrigated agriculture).
Table
Table 1. Environmental risk factors used to assess the relationships with STH incidence.
Table 1. Environmental risk factors used to assess the relationships with STH incidence.
Data TypeVariableSourceDescription
TopographicElevation, slope and Terrain Shape Index (TSI)RNRA
L&M		Using the DEM, an elevation map was created and further used to generated Slope and Terrain Shape Index [26] using ArcGIS. The outputs have a high spatial resolution with a cell size of 10 × 10 m.
ClimaticRain, temperature
humidity, evapo-transpiration		NMSData are measured nationwide at 183 meteorological and agro-meteorological weather stations and were interpolated and resampled to a cell size of 800 m.
Soil characteristicspH, Clay and sand percentageMINAGRIThe soil geo-database of Rwanda created in 2000 by MINAGRI in collaboration with Ghent University, Belgium. Resolution: 500 m (1/50,000)
Water bodies & WetlandsWetland area, wetland proportion, wetland useREMA & RNRANational inventory of wetlands by REMA in 2008 updated in collaboration with RNRA in 2012. Ortho-photograph resolution: 0.25 m.
Rice crop areaMINAGRIThe GIS database of the Rural Sector Support Program of MINAGRI considering new wetland management or rehabilitation for intensive cropping. Resolution: 25 m.
Socio-economic conditionsDemography: Population, pop. density, number of householdsNISRThe fourth Rwandan Population and Housing Census, August 2012
Residential area
Sanitation
Water source
Education level
Datasets were obtained from: Rwanda Natural Resource Authority, Land and Mapping Department (RNRA/L&M), Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry (MINAGRI), Rwanda Environmental Management Authority (REMA), National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR).

2.3. Comparison of Spatial Patterns of STH Incidence and Prevalence at District and HFSA Level

Incidence and prevalence are both measurements of disease frequency. Incidence estimates how often disease occurs in a given area and time period (a measure of disease risk). Prevalence evaluates how a disease is spread in a given population (a measure of disease burden) at a given moment in time. The first step of our analysis evaluates if areas with high STH prevalence correspond with areas with high STH incidence, for which we compare the 2008 prevalence at each of the 136 surveyed schools with incidence rates at the corresponding HFSA. Both prevalence and incidence STH data were also aggregated and mapped at district level to enable visual comparison.

2.4. Converting Confirmed Cases of STH Infection to Incidence Rates

The number of confirmed STH cases per HFSA per month was summed per year and subsequently aggregated to the district level. The annual number of confirmed cases and demographic data were combined using Excel and then linked to the district and HFSA boundary data used for visualization. The incidence rate is computed as the number of cases per district (n = 30) or HFSA (n = 367) divided by the population of that district or HFSA, as computed with the equation below:
Di = (In/Pt) × 1000 (0) *
where Di is the incidence rate, In is the total number of new cases in 12 months of a year per district/HFSA and Pt is the total population of that year for that entity. * Rates are reported per 10,000 persons at the district level and per 1000 persons at the HFSA level [27].
To account for rate instability, raw incidence rates of sparsely populated HFSAs were replaced with weighted averages using empirical Bayesian smoothing (EBS) [28]. Data were smoothed using SpaceStat software [29]. For the visualization, incidence rates were classified into four classes using the Jenks classification. The same classes were compared across years and between incidence and prevalence maps at the district level. Furthermore, the average incidence rates for 2008 at the HFSA level were superimposed on the points map of the 136 schools surveyed during the nationwide mapping of 2008. A scatter plot was then generated to illustrate the association between incidence rates at the HFSA level and prevalence rates per school.

2.5. Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis and Test for Spatial Clustering

Spatial autocorrelation was computed to ascertain if spatial clustering occurs between neighbouring HFSAs. We conducted an exploratory data analysis by plotting the semivariogram and conducting the Moran’s index test [30]. Moran’s I was used to identify spatial clusters using cluster and outlier analysis. Negative values indicate negative spatial autocorrelation; positive values indicate the reverse. Values range from −1 (indicating perfect dispersion) to +1 (perfect correlation). A zero value indicates a random spatial pattern [31].

2.6. Assessment of Relationship between STHs Incidence and Environmental Covariates

Incidence data and potentially associated environmental factor data were integrated at the HFSA level using ArcGIS 10.2.2. All bio-physical factors maps were standardized to a resolution of 10 × 10 m. Average values for potential explanatory variables for each District and HFSA were extracted using the zonal statistic module of ArcGIS 10.2.2. After that, all data were exported to IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20 for further analysis.
The choice of explanatory variables is an important step when constructing any statistical model [32]. Before training the model, the selected variables were screened for collinearity [33]. The next step was to split the available HFSA-level data (n = 367) into calibration and validation subsets. We randomly selected 60% of the available data as training the dataset (n = 220) for model fitting and the remaining 40% for model validation (n = 147). The proportions of the two subsets follow the principle of using more data for calibration, and a validation subset reaching at least 35% [34,35]. The validation and calibration data were selected using an online list randomizer tool (https://www.random.org/lists/ (accessed on 15 January 2016).
EBS-smoothed STH incidence rates, as dependent variable y were related to the potentially explanatory variables as variables X1 to Xn. The purpose was to quantify the strength of the relationship between STH incidence and the significant covariates [36,37]. We also report the standardized coefficient to identify which of the independent variables have a greater effect on the dependent variable. This is needed since our variables have different units of measurement [38].

3. Results

3.1. Spatial Patterns of STH Incidence at District Level

The total number of confirmed STH infections was 1,204,330 for 2008. At the district level, the number of reported cases ranged from 22,000 to 78,000. If we consider individual STH species, very significant differences can be observed (see Figure 2). Rwandans are frequently infected with T. trichiura, amounting to 57% of all recorded STH cases, followed by A. lumbricoides (38%) and a much lower infection rate with Hookworm (5%). The district-level incidence of individual STH species and of co-infection for the population at risk is summarized in Figure 2 and visualized in Figure 3a–d.
Some Districts (e.g., Rwamagana ad Ngororero) have relatively low incidence rates. Others such as, for example, Musanze and Huye exhibit high incidence rates.
In Figure 2, combined STH infections show incidence rates ranging between 140 and 800 per 10,000 persons (Figure 3a). T. trichiura is a nationwide problem in Rwanda, with incidence rates ranging between 78 and 500 per 10,000 persons (Figure 3b). Ascaris lumbricoides incidence follows with rates ranging between 15 and 410 per 10,000 persons (Figure 3c). Hookworm incidence rates are much lower, varying between 3 and 65 per 10,000 persons (Figure 3d). The Northern Province is the most infected region. Kicukiro District (of Kigali city, Rwanda) exhibits a high incidence rate in general and specifically for T. trichiura (500 per 10,000 persons).

3.2. Comparing District Level Prevalence and Incidence Data

To check if there is a significant relationship between prevalence and incidence data, we compared district-level incidence rates from 2008 with district-level prevalence data based on the 2008 nationwide school-based survey. Figure 3 illustrates both incidence and prevalence data at district level for individual STH species and for all infections combined, as well as scatter plots that illustrate the correlation between the two. We can observe that the correlations vary considerably, with correlation coefficients of 0.63, 0.27, 0.1 and 0.02 for A. lumbricoides, Hookworm, combined STH infection and T. trichiura, respectively. The high correlation coefficient for A. lumbricoides indicates that routinely recorded cases of A. lumbricoides can be used to complement prevalence data extrapolated to the district level. To a much lesser degree, this also is the case for hookworm. For combined STH infections and T. trichiura, the prevalence and incidence rates are very different.

3.3. Spatial Patterns and Spatial Clusters of STH Transmission at the HFSA Level

In the following, we further analyse the spatial patterns and clustering of STH transmission at the detailed spatial scale of the HFSA, as illustrated in Figure 4.
Figure 4a shows that combined STH infection is widespread in Rwanda, with medium to high incidence rates in many HFSAs throughout the country. The spatial patterns of T. trichiura are overall similar, as visualized in Figure 4b. A. lumbricoides on the other hand exhibits a much more focalized spatial distribution with areas of high transmission in the northern, southern and south-western areas of the country (see Figure 4c). As illustrated in Figure 4d, only a few HFSAs have high transmission rates of hookworm (namely, Kabuga HFSA in Kamonyi district, Gatare HFSA in Nyamasheke district, Rwahi HFSA in Rulindo district, Rutenderi HFSA in Gakenke district and Mucaca HFSA in Burera district). Apart from these areas, hookworm does not have high incidence rates in Rwanda.
Spatial auto-correlation analysis was subsequently performed per STH species and for combined STH incidence at the HFSA level using Moran’s index. Outcomes are illustrated in Table 2 and show positive and statistically significant spatial autocorrelations.
Moran’s I statistic indicates that there is a less than 1% likelihood that the clustered pattern could be the result of random chance for A. lumbricoides and for combined STH infections. The spatial clustering of T. trichiura has a less than 5% likelihood of being the result of random chance. The spatial pattern of hookworm is random.
The Anselin local Moran’s I cluster analysis results at the HFSA level presents three levels of spatial association (see Figure 5): no significant association, positive spatial association (the High–High and Low–Low clusters) and negative spatial association (the High–Low and Low–High outliers).

3.4. STH Incidence at District and HFSA Level and Their Association with Environmental Factors

The best-fitting model was obtained using a stepwise linear regression with a random distribution of residuals producing the highest R-squared and lowest standard error. The environmental factors associated with STH incidences vary per STH species and with the spatial scale of analysis. Table 3 summarizes the statistical outputs of correlated ecological factors (low elevation, less sandy soil, percentage of area covered by wetland, wetland use for rice cultivation), climatic conditions (rainfall) and socio-demographic characteristics (rural population, number of households, poor sanitary conditions).
The exploratory regression models indicate that environmental factors explain between 13 and 30% of the total variability in T. trichiura, A. lumbricoides and combined STH cases at different spatial scale. The combined STH incidence model reached 82% at the district level. Hookworm incidence was poorly explained by the available risk factors, reaching only 8% at the HFSA level (see Table 4).

4. Discussion

These findings illustrated that incidence rates of especially T. trichuira were much higher than that of hookworm in 2008 (see Figure 2). Most likely, this is related to the fact that T. trichuira is highly unresponsive to a single regimen of albendazole and mebendazole [39]. We also demonstrated that the spatial distribution of STH incidence is quite different among individual STH species. Thus, it is advisable to separately assess spatial patterns of STH incidence for each STH species. The readily available systematically recorded routine health data at detailed spatial scale makes the spatial assessment of individual STHs simple and cheaper. By using data of individual STH species, we can separately also assess the relationships between potentially associated risk factors and STH incidence more directly. Although STHs are considered to be widespread in Rwanda, the distinctive local characteristics and the association with biophysical parameters (such as wetlands and wetland use) is significant.
Incidence rates versus prevalence data at the district level. We observed a clear relationship between the incidence and prevalence data at the district level for some but not all STH species. There is a significant positive correlation between incidence and prevalence data for A. lumbricoides and hookworm, while for T. trichiura and the STH combined, only a weak positive significant correlation was observed. The prevalence data are extrapolated to the district level on the basis of results obtained at four to six surveyed schools per district. The Rwandan cross-sectional prevalence survey follows the World Health Organization guidelines [40], but it has some limitations. One limitation is that the sampling strategy used is not spatially stratified, and it includes only a limited number of schools to represent a large geographical area with internally varying risk of infection [12]. In addition, the primary school-based prevalence surveys focus on school age children, while pre-school children might be much more exposed. In reality, the increase of wetland reclamation for rice cultivation during the last decade [41] has most probably increased exposure for adults involved in rice cropping activities (i.e., women and their infants).
Different spatial patterns for individual STH species. Routinely collected data captured at the health facility level can be used to identify and visualize the spatial patterns of STH incidence at a fine geographic resolution, as illustrated in Figure 2. STH transmission is not uniformly distributed across the country. The presence of spatial clusters, detected by Moran’s I and LISA (Table 2 and Figure 5), confirms this. Previous studies have also reported on the disparate spatial distributions of different STH species [42]. This study has highlighted that T. trichiura is geographically widespread in Rwanda, with 57% of the population infected. More importantly, the spatial patterns of the three STH species are very different. This is in line with Clements et al. [12], who also identified different spatial patterns for the same STH species in Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya and Burundi. There are relatively few cases of hookworm compared with other intestinal helminths in Rwanda. Since transmission to humans usually occurs through bare feet on contaminated soil, the limited number of reported cases may be linked to improved socio-economic conditions in Rwanda during the last decade [43], leading to the increased wearing of shoes.
STH species incidence is associated with different environmental variables. The regression models demonstrate different fits at district and HFSA level and under different environmental conditions. The multiple regressions generated models with four independent contributions: from soil sand content, rainfall, area proportion of wetland and demography. It appears that in general, the STHs are more likely to infect people in more populated rural areas with less sandy soil and higher rainfall and in wetland-rich areas. The differences between associated factors and STH incidence appear to be related to different helminth living conditions and different transmission mechanisms, which vary geographically [15]. A. lumbricoides incidence is mainly associated with densely populated rural areas with less sandy soils and high rainfall. T. trichiura incidence, on the other hand, is clearly associated with wetlands outside urban areas, while Hookworm is weakly associated with lower altitudes.
Many of the associated biophysical factors are directly or indirectly related to wetlands environments. During the last decade, rice has become a major food crop in Rwanda; as a result, the area for rice production increased from 4000 to 16,000 hectares between 2000 and 2010 [41]. Overall, our findings are consistent with other studies [12,44,45], who found that soil moisture and relative atmospheric humidity are important environmental determinants of STH development and transmission.
The relationship between high population density and intestinal helminth incidence comes from residential settings allowing favourable conditions for transmission [46]. In Rwanda, with persistent and growing urban and sub-urban agriculture [47], this remains a problem. Again, our findings are congruent with other studies that identify the use of unimproved water sources for domestic use and poor sanitary and housing conditions as important risk factors. Mascarini-Serra ([45], p. 178) nicely captures this by stating, “The prevalence of STHs in the community can be used as an indicator of the conditions of living, environmental sanitation, level of education, and the socio-economic status of the community”.
Limitations of the study. The number of confirmed cases recorded at health facilities may be only a fraction of all infected persons for a number of reasons. First, self-treatment is common in Rwanda, as it is in many developing countries [48]. Often families practice regular de-worming using either traditional medicinal treatment or anti-intestinal medication obtained from a pharmacy. Second, reported cases will probably involve patients with more severe infections and with clear clinical symptoms. Third, the routine health data used for this study are collected from public and faith-based health facilities only. Since the proportion of people seeking private health care in Rwanda is limited, this is considered to only have a minor influence [49]. Fourth, the proportion of reported cases may also be influenced by variations in health-seeking behaviour. This may explain the relatively high number of confirmed STH cases in urbanized areas (i.e., Kicukiro district of Kigali city and Huye district) inhabited by relatively well-educated population groups. On the positive side, the Rwandan Health Management Information System systematically and accurately records laboratory confirmed STH cases at a fine geographic resolution [50]. The setup of the community-based health insurance furthermore makes it possible to accurately delineate the geographic service area of health facilities. Because of this, we feel that recorded STH cases can be adequately used identify and monitor the spatial and temporal patterns of STH transmission for individual STH species in Rwanda.

5. Conclusions

Routinely collected confirmed STH cases are suitable for generating spatially explicit overviews of the distribution and intensity of STH transmission for small geographic units, which we here termed HFSA. The distributions of individual and combined STH incidence in Rwanda varies per helminth species and with environmental conditions. It is also clear that the STH occurrence is geographically clustered in areas much smaller than the district level, which has been used to date. T. trichiura is highly endemic, with a broad spatial distribution throughout the country. Hookworm has the lowest incidence rates with an almost random spatial distribution.
A significant geographical association is observed between STH incidence and specific biophysical and socio-demographic factors. The most strongly associated biophysical factors are directly or indirectly related to wetland environments. The number of STH cases is also associated with increasing rainfall, population density, the proportion of the rural population, the area covered by wetlands and rice cropping and less sandy soils and at lowest elevation levels.
Since the routine health data used in this study are readily available, the approach described in this study can be used to design the spatial sampling for prevalence and/or to complement the prevalence data. Finally, the presented methodology can contribute to more effective, location-specific STH control program design and evaluation.

Author Contributions

E.N. designed the study, conducted the statistical analysis, interpreted the findings, and wrote the manuscript. T.V. designed the study, interpreted the findings, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. S.A. co-designed the study, interpreted the findings and contributed to the writing and critical revision of the manuscript. E.R., N.R. and I.U. interpreted the findings and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The Netherlands Initiative for Capacity development in Higher Education (NICHE), NICHE/RWA/071. The APC was funded by the University of Twente, The Netherlands.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Most of the data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. STH infection data for 2008 were obtained from the Rwanda Biomedical Centre—Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases division and are available from the corresponding author only with the permission of the Rwanda Biomedical Centre—Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases division.

Acknowledgments

The health data used for this research were obtained in anonymized form and acquired from and used in accordance with the data-sharing and publication agreement signed between the researchers and the Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases Division of the Rwanda Biomedical Centre.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lai, Y.S.; Zhou, X.N.; Utzinger, J.; Vounatsou, P. Bayesian geostatistical modelling of soil-transmitted helminth survey data in the People’s Republic of China. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. TRAC+. National Prevalence Survey on Soil-Transmitted Helminths and Schistosomiasis in School-Aged Children; Access Project; TRAC PLUS-Centre for Infectious Disease Control: Kigali, Rwanda, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. WHO. Rwanda-Country Profile. Preventive Chemotherapy and Transmission Control; WHO: Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Katz, N.; Chaves, A.; Pellegrino, J. A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in Schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 1972, 14, 397–400. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ruxin, J.; Negin, J. Removing the neglect from neglected tropical diseases: The Rwandan experience 2008–2010. Glob. Public Health Int. J. Res. Policy Pract. 2012, 7, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rujeni, N.; Morona, D.; Ruberanziza, E.; Mazigo, H.D. Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Rwanda: An update on their epidemiology and control. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2017, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Ruberanziza, E.; Owada, K.; Clark, N.J.; Umulisa, I.; Ortu, G.; Lancaster, W.; Munyaneza, T.; Mbituyumuremyi, A.; Bayisenge, U.; Fenwick, A.; et al. Mapping Soil-Transmitted Helminth Parasite Infection in Rwanda: Estimating Endemicity and Identifying At-Risk Populations. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 4, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Clark, N.J.; Owada, K.; Ruberanziza, E.; Ortu, G.; Umulisa, I.; Bayisenge, U.; Mbonigaba, J.B.; Mucaca, J.B.; Lancaster, W.; Fenwick, A.; et al. Parasite associations predict infection risk: Incorporating co-infections in predictive models for neglected tropical diseases. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abera, A.; Nibret, E. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthic infections and associated risk factors among schoolchildren in Tilili town, northwest Ethiopia. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pullan, R.L.; Kabatereine, N.B.; Quinnell, R.J.; Brooker, S. Spatial and Genetic Epidemiology of Hookworm in a Rural Community in Uganda. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kaliappan, S.P.; George, S.; Francis, M.R.; Kattula, D.; Sarkar, R.; Minz, S.; Mohan, V.R.; George, K.; Roy, S.; Ajjampur, S.S.R.; et al. Prevalence and clustering of soil-transmitted helminth infections in a tribal area in southern India. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2013, 18, 1452–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Clements, A.C.A.; Deville, M.-A.; Ndayishimiye, O.; Brooker, S.; Fenwick, A. Spatial co-distribution of neglected tropical diseases in the East African Great Lakes region: Revisiting the justification for integrated control. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2010, 15, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Halpenny, C.M.; Paller, C.; Koski, K.G.; Valdés, V.E.; Scott, M.E. Regional, Household and Individual Factors that Influence Soil Transmitted Helminth Reinfection Dynamics in Preschool Children from Rural Indigenous Panamá. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Strunz, E.C.; Addiss, D.G.; Stocks, M.E.; Ogden, S.; Utzinger, J.; Freeman, M.C. Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS Med. 2014, 11, e1001620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Larsen, M.N.; Roepstorff, A. Seasonal variation in development and survival of Ascaris suum and Trichuris suis eggs on pastures. Parasitology 1999, 119, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nyandwi, E.; Veldkamp, A.; Amer, S.; Karema, C.; Umulisa, I. Schistosomiasis mansoni incidence data in Rwanda can improve prevalence assessments, by providing high-resolution hotspot and risk factors identification. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. NISR. Fourth Rwanda Population and Housing Census. In Thematic Report: Population Projections; NISR: Kigali, Rwanda, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rwanda. Ministerial Instruction/Min/2012 Defining the Functioning Norms of Private Health Establishment in Rwanda, Kigali; Rwanda: Kigali, Rwanda, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. The Third Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey; National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda: Kigali, Rwanda, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. Swedesurvey. Project of Rwanda National Land Use and Development Master Plan, Report for Production of Ortho Photo in Rwanda; Swedesurvey: Stockholm, Sweden, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  21. McNab, W.H. Terrain Shape Index: Quantifying Effect of Minor Landforms on Tree Height. For. Sci. 1989, 35, 91–104. [Google Scholar]
  22. Verdoodt, A.; van Ranst, E. Environmental assessment tools for multi-scale land resources information systems: A case study of Rwanda. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114, 170–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hijmans, R.J.; Cameron, S.E.; Parra, J.L.; Jones, P.G.; Jarvis, A. Very High Resolution Interpolated Climate Surfaces for Global Land Areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005, 25, 1965–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. REMA. Etablissement d’un Inventaire National Rapide des Marais et Élaboration de 5 Avant-Projets D’arrêtés Ministériels Relatifs Aux Marais; Rwanda Environment Management Authority Kigali: Kigali, Rwanda, 2008; p. 58. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nyandwi, E.; Veldkamp, T.A.; Amer, S. Regional climate sensitivity of wetland environments in Rwanda: The need for a location-specific approach. Reg. Environ. Change 2015, 16, 1635–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hurlimann, E.; Schur, N.; Boutsika, K.; Stensgaard, A.; Laserna de Himpsl, M.; Ziegelbauer, K.; Laizer, N.; Camenzind, L.; Di Pasquale, A.; Ekpo, U.; et al. Toward an open-access global database for mapping, control, and surveillance of neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Rothman, K.J. Epidemiology: An Introduction, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press, Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2012; p. 268. [Google Scholar]
  28. Goovaerts, P. Accounting for rate instability and spatial patterns in the boundary analysis of cancer mortality maps. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2008, 15, 421–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. CDC. BioMedware SpaceStat-Empirical Bayesian Smoothing. Available online: https://www.biomedware.com/files/documentation/spacestat/Statistics/Smoothing/Empirical_Bayesian_Smoothing.htm (accessed on 5 November 2014).
  30. Getis, A.; Ord, J.K. The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geogr. Anal. 1992, 24, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Getis, A. A History of the Concept of Spatial Autocorrelation: A Geographer’s Perspective. Geogr. Anal. 2007, 40, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hessami, M.; Gachon, P.; Ouarda, T.B.M.J.; St-Hilaire, A. Automated regression-based statistical downscaling tool. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008, 23, 813–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ortega Hinojosa, A.M.; Davies, M.M.; Jarjour, S.; Burnett, R.T.; Mann, J.K.; Hughes, E.; Balmes, J.R.; Turner, M.C.; Jerrett, M. Developing small-area predictions for smoking and obesity prevalence in the United States for use in Environmental Public Health Tracking. Environ. Res. 2014, 134, 435–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lehmann, E.L. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks, 1st ed.; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998; p. 463. [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Oost, K.; Govers, G.; Cerdan, O.; Thauré, D.; Van Rompaey, A.; Steegen, A.; Nachtergaele, J.; Takken, I.; Poesen, J. Spatially distributed data for erosion model calibration and validation: The Ganspoel and Kinderveld datasets. CATENA 2005, 61, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kabo, G.J.; Paulechka, Y.U.; Zaitsau, D.H.; Firaha, A.S. Prediction of the enthalpies of vaporization for room-temperature ionic liquids: Correlations and a substitution-based additive scheme. Thermochim. Acta 2015, 609, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Z.J.; Chapiro, J.; Schernthaner, R.; Duran, R.; Chen, R.X.; Geschwind, J.F.; Lin, M.D. Multimodality 3D Tumor Segmentation in HCC Patients Treated with TACE. Acad. Radiol. 2015, 22, 840–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lemeshow, S.; Moeschberger, M.L. Review of Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models by Vittinghoff, Glidden, Shiboski, and McCulloch. Strata 2005, 5, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Legesse, M.; Erko, B.; Medhin, G. Efficacy of alebendazole and mebendazole in the treatment of Ascaris and Trichuris infections. Ethiop. Med. J. 2002, 40, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Montresor, A.; Crompton, D.W.T.; Hall, A.; Bundy, D.A.P.; Savioli, L. Guidelines for Evaluation of Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis and Schistosomiasis at Community Level; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  41. Malesu, M.M.; Oduor, A.R.; Chrogony, K.; Nyolei, D.; Gachene, C.K.K.; Biamah, E.K.; O’Neil, M.; Ilyama, M.; Mogoi, J.; Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan. The Government of Rwanda, Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources, Ebony Company Limited and World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). Nairobi, Kenya. Available online: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/Publications/PDFS/B16738.pdf (accessed on 30 January 2017).
  42. Abera, B.; Alem, G.; Melaku, M. Epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminths, Schistosoma mansoni, and haematocrit values among schoolchildren in Ethiopia. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2012, 7, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. MINECOFIN. Demographic and Health Survey [DHS] 2014/2015 Key Findings; MINECOFIN: Kigali, Rwanda, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  44. Brooker, S.; Clements, A.C.; Bundy, D.A. Global epidemiology, ecology and control of soil-transmitted helminth infections. Adv. Parasitol. 2006, 62, 221–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Mascarini-Serra, L. Prevention of Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2011, 3, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Macchioni, F.; Segundo, H.; Gabrielli, S.; Totino, V.; Gonzales, P.R.; Salazar, E.; Bozo, R.; Bartoloni, A.; Cancrini, G. Dramatic Decrease in Prevalence of Soil-Transmitted Helminths and New Insights Into Intestinal Protozoa in Children Living in the Chaco Region, Bolivia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 92, 794–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Thaxton, M. Integrating Population, Health, and Environment in Rwanda; Population Reference Bureau: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  48. Phillips, D.R. Health and Health Care in the Third World; Longman Scientific & Technical: Harlow, UK, 1990; p. 334. [Google Scholar]
  49. NISR; MOH; ICF International. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2010; National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR): Kigali, Rwanda; Ministry of Health (MOH): Singapore; ICF International: Calverton, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  50. USAID/Rwanda. Rwanda HMIS Assessment Report; 9 May 2006; USAID: Kigali, Rwanda, 2006. [Google Scholar]
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g001 550
Figure 1. District boundaries, primary health facility locations as provided by RBC–GIS unit and Health Facility Service Area (HFSA) boundaries delineated using spatial allocation tools and data from the community-based health insurance scheme in 2010.
Figure 1. District boundaries, primary health facility locations as provided by RBC–GIS unit and Health Facility Service Area (HFSA) boundaries delineated using spatial allocation tools and data from the community-based health insurance scheme in 2010.
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g001
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g002 550
Figure 2. STH incidence rates (per 10,000 persons) per district in Rwanda for 2008, as reported in RHIMS.
Figure 2. STH incidence rates (per 10,000 persons) per district in Rwanda for 2008, as reported in RHIMS.
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g002
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g003 550
Figure 3. STH incidence and prevalence rates and their correlation at the district level. Starting from the left-upper corner, incidence maps for combined STHs (a), for T. trichiura (b), for A. lumbricoides, (c) and for hookworm (d). The prevalence maps and scatter plots are shown for combined STH cases (e), individual cases with T. trichiura (f), A. lumbricoides (g) and hookworm (h).
Figure 3. STH incidence and prevalence rates and their correlation at the district level. Starting from the left-upper corner, incidence maps for combined STHs (a), for T. trichiura (b), for A. lumbricoides, (c) and for hookworm (d). The prevalence maps and scatter plots are shown for combined STH cases (e), individual cases with T. trichiura (f), A. lumbricoides (g) and hookworm (h).
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g003
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g004 550
Figure 4. Incidence rates at HFSA level for combined STH infection (a), T. trichiura (b), A. lumbricoides (c) and hookworm (d).
Figure 4. Incidence rates at HFSA level for combined STH infection (a), T. trichiura (b), A. lumbricoides (c) and hookworm (d).
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g004
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g005 550
Figure 5. Spatial distributions of Anselin local Moran’s I at the HFSA level, for (a) combined STH cases; (b) T. trichiura; (c) A. lumbricoides and (d) hookworm.
Figure 5. Spatial distributions of Anselin local Moran’s I at the HFSA level, for (a) combined STH cases; (b) T. trichiura; (c) A. lumbricoides and (d) hookworm.
Tropicalmed 07 00202 g005
Table
Table 2. Moran’s index computed for each STH species and for and combined STH incidence rates at the HFSA level.
Table 2. Moran’s index computed for each STH species and for and combined STH incidence rates at the HFSA level.
YearMoran’s Ip-Valuez-Score
Combined STH0.1130.0000064.51
Trichuris trichiura0.0520.0372.08
Ascaris lumbricoides0.3750.00000014.433
Hookworm0.00560.7440.326
Table
Table 3. Standardized beta coefficients of associated factors at District and HFSA spatial scale.
Table 3. Standardized beta coefficients of associated factors at District and HFSA spatial scale.
FactorsCombinedTrichuris TrichiuraAscaris LumbricoidesHookworm
DistrictHFSADistrictHFSADistrictHFSAdistricthfsa
pH--0.43 **-----
Sand prop (%)−0.38 **−0.41 **---−0.43 **--
Elevation (m)−0.53 **------−0.29 **
Wetland area (ha)--------
Wetland proportion (%)0.39 **0.22 **-0.46 **----
Wetland rice cultivation (ha)---0.26 *----
Rainfall0.43 **0.29 **---0.31 **--
Number of households----0.37 *---
Unimproved sanitation--0.37 *-----
Rural-0.125 *---0.12 *--
Urban---−0.27 *----
Coefficient presented are significant with: p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**).
Table
Table 4. Summary of linear regression models for incidence rates per STH species.
Table 4. Summary of linear regression models for incidence rates per STH species.
Spatial LevelFactorSignificant VariablesR2Std. Error of the Estimate
Ascaris lumbricoides
HFSAClimaticRain0.27337.802
PhysicalSand percentage
Socio-economicPercentage rural population
DistrictDemographicNumber of households0.132952.698
Hookworm
HFSAPhysicalElevation0.0852.635
District
Trichuris trichiura
HFSAEcologicalWetland cultivated area0.2290.302
Wetland proportion
DemographicUrban proportion
DistrictPhysicalpH0.30395.764
DemographicUnimproved sanitation
Combined STH
HFSAClimaticRain0.24362.725
PhysicalSand percentage
EcologicalWetland prop
DemographicRural proportion
DistrictPhysicalElevation, Sand percentage0.8231553.642
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nyandwi, E.; Veldkamp, T.; Amer, S.; Ruberanziza, E.; Rujeni, N.; Umulisa, I. Using Routinely Collected Health Records to Identify the Fine-Resolution Spatial Patterns of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Rwanda. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080202

AMA Style

Nyandwi E, Veldkamp T, Amer S, Ruberanziza E, Rujeni N, Umulisa I. Using Routinely Collected Health Records to Identify the Fine-Resolution Spatial Patterns of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Rwanda. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022; 7(8):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nyandwi, Elias, Tom Veldkamp, Sherif Amer, Eugene Ruberanziza, Nadine Rujeni, and Ireneé Umulisa. 2022. "Using Routinely Collected Health Records to Identify the Fine-Resolution Spatial Patterns of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Rwanda" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 7, no. 8: 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080202

APA Style

Nyandwi, E., Veldkamp, T., Amer, S., Ruberanziza, E., Rujeni, N., & Umulisa, I. (2022). Using Routinely Collected Health Records to Identify the Fine-Resolution Spatial Patterns of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Rwanda. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 7(8), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080202

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop