Next Article in Journal
An Impact Factor for Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Prevalence and Determinants of Exposure-Influenced HIV Testing among a Sample of Pre- and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis-Naïve Young Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States
Previous Article in Journal
Determinants of Patients’ Adherence to Malaria Treatment in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Previous Article in Special Issue
Medical Care for Tuberculosis-HIV-Coinfected Patients in Russia with Respect to a Changeable Patients’ Structure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
TropicalMed
Volume 7
Issue 7
10.3390/tropicalmed7070139
tropicalmed-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Suboptimal Follow-Up on HIV Test Results among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Community-Based Study in Two U.S. Cities

by
Ying Wang
1,
Jason Mitchell
2,
Chen Zhang
3,
Lauren Brown
4,5,
Sarahmona Przybyla
6 and
Yu Liu
1,*
1
Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
2
Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
3
School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
4
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
5
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
6
Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7(7), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7070139
Submission received: 25 June 2022 / Revised: 15 July 2022 / Accepted: 17 July 2022 / Published: 19 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue HIV Testing, Prevention and Care Cascade)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Frequent HIV testing and knowledge of HIV serostatus is the premise before timely access to HIV prevention and treatment services, but a portion of young men who have sex with men (YMSM) do not always follow up on their HIV test results after HIV testing, which is detrimental to the implementation of HIV prevention and care among this subgroup. The comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results may inform relevant interventions to address this critical issue among YMSM. To this end, we conducted a cross-sectional study in Nashville, Tennessee and Buffalo, New York from May 2019 to May 2020 to assess demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial correlates of inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results among YMSM. Of the 347 participants, 27.1% (n = 94) reported inconsistent follow-up on their HIV test results. Multivariable logistic regression showed that inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results was positively associated with condomless receptive anal sex, group sex, recreational drug use before or during sex, internalized homophobia, and stress; while negatively associated with housing stability, social support, and general resilience. Future HIV prevention intervention efforts should target these modifiable determinants to enhance the follow-up on HIV test results among YMSM.

1. Introduction

Approximately 1.2 million people aged 13 years and older in the United States (U.S.) were estimated to be living with HIV, including 158,000 undiagnosed HIV infections. Over 60% of 36,801 new HIV diagnoses in 2019 were among men who have sex with men (MSM), of whom approximately two-thirds were between 13–34 years of age [1]. Prior literature has identified a plethora of behaviors that may predispose young men who have sex with men (YMSM) at higher risk of HIV acquisition, including condomless anal sex, substance use, and multiple sex partners [2,3,4]. Studies have reported YMSM may be more prone to experiencing higher levels of social stigma and mental health burdens, while also lacking the necessary experience in finding and accessing HIV prevention services (e.g., HIV testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis [PrEP]) [5,6,7,8]. These findings underscore that YMSM represent the sex and gender minority subgroup of the highest priority for targeted HIV prevention interventions in the U.S.
Accurate knowledge of one’s HIV serostatus through frequent HIV testing is important to help curtail the HIV epidemic among YMSM in the U.S. [9,10]. Knowledge of one’s HIV serostatus requires being tested and receiving the results as a precursor before any linkage to evidence-based HIV prevention-care services can occur, including antiretroviral therapy (for individuals with HIV positive diagnosis) and PrEP care (for high-risk individuals who are HIV negative) [11,12]. Furthermore, knowledge of one’s HIV serostatus as seropositive accompanies counseling and linkage to appropriate care services, which has been shown to increase awareness of and engagement in risk-reduction strategies, including treatment adherence—all important steps to prevent the onward transmission of HIV [11,13].
Given the importance of timely knowledge of one’s HIV serostatus, an increasing evidence base of HIV prevention interventions have been designed and implemented to improve regular HIV testing uptake among YMSM in the U.S. [14,15,16,17,18]. However, the uptake of HIV testing is not equivalent to the knowledge of HIV test results. Studies have shown that MSM may experience low rates of follow-up on their HIV test results [19,20]. For instance, data from a randomized controlled trial to improve HIV testing among MSM in the U.S. showed that only 32% of intervention participants who requested HIV testing kits followed up on their test results (vs. 0% in the control group) [21]. Studies among MSM in other countries found that 5–11% of MSM had failure-to-return for HIV test results [19,22]. Prior literature reveals significant correlates of failure-to-return for HIV test results, including perceived risk of HIV infection, inconsistent condom use, and certain demographic characteristics such as male gender, young age, unemployment, rural residence, and low educational attainment [19,23,24,25,26]. Although these studies provide salient insights into factors associated with failure-to-return for HIV test results, few studies assessed relevant psychosocial determinants and their effects on HIV prevention uptake. Furthermore, despite the increasing number of interventions to enhance HIV testing among YMSM in the U.S., few emphasized the failure-to-return challenge and methods for increasing follow-up on test results. Moreover, no study to date has investigated the prevalence and factors associated with failure-to-return for HIV test results among YMSM in the U.S.
Comprehensive evaluation of failure-to-return for HIV test results and associated factors may inform HIV prevention efforts to address this critical issue among YMSM. We conducted a community-based study with YMSM in two U.S. cities to assess: (1) the prevalence of inconsistent (i.e., not always) follow-up on HIV test results, (2) demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial correlates, and (3) evaluate the relationship between inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results and various HIV prevention measures, including HIV testing, PrEP uptake, and condom use self-efficacy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Procedures

The present quantitative, cross-sectional analysis comes from an HIV prevention study that was conducted in Nashville, Tennessee and Buffalo, New York between May 2019 and May 2020. The HIV prevention study investigated potential HIV risk factors and prevention outcomes among YMSM living in these two cities; findings on these relevant topics have previously been reported [5,27]. All procedures and related activities for the HIV prevention study and present analysis were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Rochester and University at Buffalo, and all participants provided informed consent.
A combination of a convenience sampling strategy, along with online and offline approaches, were used to recruit potential participants. Offline recruitment included peer referrals, flier distribution, and field outreach (e.g., at local LGBT events, sexual health centers, or gay bars). Online recruitment involved advertisements on social media sites used by YMSM (e.g., Instagram and Facebook).

2.2. Participant and Data Collection

Eligibility criteria for the HIV prevention study and present analysis required participants to: (1) be between the ages of 18 and 35 years old; (2) report living in Nashville, TN or Buffalo, NY; (3) understand and read English; (4) self-report having engaged in sexual behaviors (e.g., oral and/or anal sex) with another male in the prior 12 months, or self-identify as gay, bisexual, or other cis-gender men; and (5) self-report negative or unknown HIV serostatus at the time of participation. Individuals who did not meet all inclusion criteria were excluded from participating.
Additional details about the study procedures have been reported elsewhere [27]. In short, data were collected via a 40-min, self-administered survey delivered through Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). Participants could either complete the survey on site (i.e., local sexual health centers) or request a survey link from study staff to complete it at their preferred time and location. A $35 gift card was provided to each participant who completed the survey to acknowledge his effort for participating in our study.

2.3. Measures

The dependent variable, follow-up on HIV test results, was assessed by the item, “How often have you made sure you know the test result after each test you took?” Response options (never, rarely, sometimes, often times, every time) were dichotomized into consistent (i.e., always—“every time”) follow-up vs. inconsistent (i.e., not always—all other responses) follow-up.
We also collected data on four broad categories: (1) sociodemographic characteristics (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, education, employment, annual personal income, health insurance coverage, sexual orientation, HIV risk perception, disclosure to healthcare providers (HCPs), and primary venues for finding sex partners); (2) behavioral factors including (a) recent (past six months) sexual behaviors (condomless receptive and insertive anal sex, group sex, condomless sex with HIV-positive men, and alcohol and recreational drug use before or during sex) and (b) substance use behaviors (tobacco use, binge drinking, and recreational drug use in the past 12 months); (3) psychosocial factors (i.e., housing stability, food insecurity [28], social support [29], general resilience [30], internalized homophobia [31], suicidal thoughts/behaviors [32], HIV-related stigma [33], loneliness [34], anxiety [35], depression [36], and stress [37]); and (4) HIV prevention measures (PrEP awareness, ever PrEP use, HIV home testing in the past 3, 6, 12 months and ever, HIV testing confidence [38], and condom use self-efficacy [39]).

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Continuous variables were summarized as means (standard deviations) and categorical variables were summarized as frequencies (percentages). Differences between consistent and inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results were compared using t-tests for normally distributed continuous variables, Mann–Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables, or chi-square tests for categorical variables. Separate logistic regression models were built to assess correlates of inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results with each aforementioned behavioral and psychosocial factor as the primary independent variable, respectively. Each model individually adjusted for age, education, annual personal income, and sexual orientation. These variables were selected because they were considered a priori to be important predictors of knowledge of test results [23,25,40] and presented a significant association with the outcome in bivariate analyses (i.e., t-tests, chi-square tests). In order to assess the impact of inconsistent follow-up on test results on uptake of HIV prevention measures, we additionally developed separate logistic regression models adjusting for the aforementioned confounders to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for each HIV prevention measure.

3. Results

Of 415 YMSM enrolled in the study, 347 completed the questionnaire and were included for analyses. Table 1 presents participants’ sociodemographic characteristics by the status of HIV test result follow-up. Most participants were 25–35 years of age (57.6%), Black or African American (60.2%), employed (70.0%), insured (81.3%), had above high school education (79.6%), earned less than $40,000 annual income (79.5%), self-identified as gay (76.9%), perceived high risk of HIV infection (78.1%), disclosed sexual orientation or same sex behaviors to HCPs (76.4%) and reported social media apps as a primary venue for finding sex partners (66.6%). In the analytic sample, 27.1% (n = 94) did not always follow up on their HIV test results. Educational level, age, annual income, health insurance, sexual orientation, disclosure of sexual orientation to HCPs, and venues to find sexual partners were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results.
Table 2 shows descriptive statistics of behavioral risk factors and multivariable analyses of associations between each factor and inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results. Compared to YMSM with consistent knowledge of test results, those who did not consistently follow up on test results showed an overall higher prevalence across all risk behaviors, including recent condomless receptive and insertive anal sex, group sex, condomless sex with HIV-positive men, recreational drug use before or during sex, and substance use (e.g., tobacco use and binge drinking). After adjustment for age, education, income and sexual orientation, inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results was significantly associated with condomless receptive anal sex (aOR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.13–3.69), group sex (aOR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.12–3.68), and recreational drug use before or during sex (aOR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.05–3.14).
Associations of psychosocial determinants and follow-up on HIV test results are presented in Table 3. YMSM who consistently followed up on their test results reported higher levels of housing stability, social support and general resilience, and had lower prevalence of psychosocial issues, including internalized homophobia, HIV related stigma, loneliness, anxiety, depression, and stress. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that lack of consistency in follow-up on test results was negatively associated with housing stability (aOR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80–0.96), social support (aOR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99), and general resilience (aOR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99), and positively associated with internalized homophobia (aOR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02–1.15) and stress (aOR = 4.49; 95% CI, 1.82–11.12).
Table 4 shows results from logistic regression analyses for associations of follow-up on HIV test results and HIV prevention outcomes. YMSM with inconsistent follow-up on their HIV test results were associated with lower levels of engagement along the PrEP care continuum including PrEP awareness (aOR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79) and ever PrEP use (aOR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.44–1.55). Lack of consistency in follow-up on test results was also negatively associated with HIV testing confidence, condom use efficacy, and HIV testing in the past 3, 6, and 12 months.

4. Discussion

The present analysis extends the literature about YMSM’s knowledge of HIV test results by estimating the prevalence of their inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results and assessing potential correlates from a convenience sample residing in two U.S. cities. Our study found that more than one-quarter of YMSM did not consistently follow up on their every HIV test result, a finding that is 15.6% higher than reported in other studies of MSM [22]. The difference may be explained by predominantly young participants in the present study, which was a risk predictor of unawareness of HIV test results [41,42,43]. Our study further identified the negative association of inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results with HIV prevention outcomes, including HIV testing frequency/confidence, PrEP awareness/uptake, and condom use self-efficacy. The positive impact of knowledge of HIV serostatus on initiation of HIV treatment and adoption of safer behaviors (e.g., condom use) has been well documented in the literature [44], indicating that knowledge of HIV test results may be an important facilitator of the uptake of HIV prevention measures as well as a modifiable target for future HIV prevention efforts. Despite an increasing body of interventions designed to improve HIV testing uptake and repeat testing in recent years, few of them were attentive to post-test follow-up [18,21,45]. Therefore, future HIV prevention efforts may be improved by incorporating education about the importance of follow-up on one’s HIV test results.
Our study found that YMSM who inconsistently followed up on their test results had increased odds of sexual behaviors that may increase the possibility of acquiring HIV, namely engaging in condomless receptive anal sex, group sex, and using recreational drugs before or during sex. The association between engaging in these behaviors and one’s knowledge of HIV test results remains inconsistent in the literature. Some studies show the involvement of risky sexual behaviors (e.g., multiple sexual partners and no condom use at last sex) was associated with higher odds of follow-up on HIV test results [19,22,41,46], whereas other studies found that those with inconsistent condom use were less likely to return for HIV test results compared to those with consistent condom use [22,41]. The significant association of risky sexual behaviors and inconsistent follow-up on test results observed in our study could be explained by self-perception of low risk for HIV infection, fear of positive results, and participant age (as younger than 35 years of age is a group least likely to follow up on test results) [19,23,41,42]. Further investigation into the predictive role of risk behaviors in awareness of HIV test results is warranted. Finally, given the mounting evidence of onward transmissions caused by risky sexual behaviors among YMSM [47,48], future intervention efforts should emphasize both conventional sexual health education and sexual health communication including HIV status disclosure to sexual partners.
In terms of psychosocial correlates, YMSM with high levels of stress were 4.49 times more likely to have inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results. Both the Vulnerability–Stress–Adaptation Model and minority stress theory maintain that MSM experience disproportionate chronic stressors, including internalized homophobia, stigma, prejudice, and discrimination [49,50]. People who experience higher stress levels tend to devalue the long-term benefits of HIV prevention behaviors [14], which may explain the lower engagement in HIV testing as well as follow-up on test results. Fortunately, current HIV prevention programs have employed multiple strategies (e.g., facilitated discussion and provision of community support) to raise awareness of stress among MSM and teach positive coping strategies [15,49]. Our study also contributes to future intervention efforts by identifying an association between general resilience and consistent follow-up on HIV test results among YMSM. Resilience has been previously linked to greater engagement in HIV prevention behaviors, and a decreased risk of condomless sex and mental health burdens among MSM [4,27,51]. Resilience was also observed to mediate the association of stress with risky sexual behaviors [50]. These results, along with the present study, suggest that resilience may be an important modifiable psychological target in future HIV intervention programs.
When evaluating the impact of social determinants of health on knowing test results, our study identified that housing stability and social support were both positive predictors of consistent follow-up on test results among YMSM. Defined as “structural determinants and conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age” [52], social determinants are thought to be the root cause of health disparities [53,54] and have been linked to lower engagement in HIV prevention behaviors, including HIV testing, follow-up on test results, and PrEP adoption [42,46,55,56,57]. Qualitative studies further revealed that suboptimal uptake of HIV prevention services among people with negative social determinants of health could be explained by lack of transportation, shortage of HIV care providers in the neighborhood, lack of comprehensive HIV education, and poor social support [58,59]. The positive association of lack of consistency in follow-up on HIV test results with psychosocial adversities observed in our study (e.g., internalized homophobia, unstable housing, and food insecurity) also provides insights into the potential effects of different testing modalities on knowledge of test results. First, HIV self-testing may have the potential to help reduce the stigma and discrimination associated with traditional venue-based testing settings (e.g., perception or actuality of HCPs’ stigmatizing attitudes/behaviors toward patients, lack of confidentiality, and sexual orientation disclosure) by providing the individual with a safe, private environment to conduct the test and interpret the result [18,60,61]. Second, HIV self-testing may also help minimize the aforementioned logistic barriers that may prevent some individuals from going to HIV testing sites, including returning to them for a test result. For traditional facility-based HIV testing, offering a variety of ways to provide the test results (e.g., telephone, text message, mobile app or email) may help lessen YMSM who either do not receive or inconsistently receive their results.
To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the few studies to examine sociodemographic, behavioral and psychosocial correlates of YMSM who never-to-inconsistently follow up on their HIV test results in two U.S. cities. However, limitations to the present analysis exist. As a cross-sectional study, the temporal relationships between the knowledge of HIV test results and the assessed correlates cannot be established. The generalizability of the findings to other YMSM throughout the U.S. must be cautioned, as the data and findings come from a convenience sample based out of two U.S. cities. Despite the use of computer-assisted self-interview, data collected by a self-administered questionnaire may be subject to recall and social desirability bias. We operationalized the study outcome as a binary variable due to the sparse response rate in some categories (i.e., never, rarely, sometimes, often times). We acknowledge that participants who never followed up on test results may differ from those who often knew the test results in behavioral/psychosocial factors. Therefore, the assessed determinants should be interpreted with caution and warrant more nuanced studies in the future. Finally, follow-up on test results relative to testing modality (e.g., HIV self-testing vs. clinic-based testing vs. community-based testing) was not assessed in the study and presents an avenue to be explored in future research.

5. Conclusions

Our study shows that 27.1% of YMSM were not consistently aware of the result after each HIV test experience. We identified negative associations between inconsistent follow-up on test results and HIV prevention outcomes, indicating that knowledge of HIV test results may be an important facilitator of the uptake of HIV prevention measures. Our study also documents significant correlates of inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results, including risky sexual behaviors (condomless receptive anal sex, group sex, and recreational drug use before or during sex) and psychosocial factors (housing stability, social support, general resilience, internalized homophobia, and stress). Despite an increasing body of interventions to enhance the uptake of HIV testing in recent years, few of them were attentive to post-test follow-up, suggesting that future HIV prevention efforts may be improved by targeting these modifiable determinants to enhance follow-up on HIV test results among YMSM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L.; Methodology, C.Z. and Y.L.; Formal Analysis, Y.W.; Data interpretation: Y.W., J.M., C.Z., L.B., S.P. and Y.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Y.W.; Writing—Review & Editing, J.M., C.Z., L.B., S.P. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry and School of Nursing Joint Award for Excellence in HIV Research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Rochester (RSRB00071128; Date of approval: 5/4/2018) and University at Buffalo (STUDY00003368; Date of approval: 3/22/2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Limited de-identified raw data available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all study participants for their time, as well as staff from Evergreen Health at Buffalo, and Nashville Council on AIDS, Resources, Education and Support, MyHouse at Nashville (My Voice Community Engagement and Research Council) for their facilitation of participant recruitment and data collection process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2015–2019. In HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2021; Volume 26. [Google Scholar]
  2. Raifman, J.; Beyrer, C.; Arrington-Sanders, R. HIV Education and Sexual Risk Behaviors among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men. LGBT Health 2018, 5, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Macapagal, K.; Moskowitz, D.A.; Li, D.H.; Carrión, A.; Bettin, E.; Fisher, C.B.; Mustanski, B. Hookup App Use, Sexual Behavior, and Sexual Health among Adolescent Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States. J. Adolesc. Health 2018, 62, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. McNair, O.S.; Gipson, J.A.; Denson, D.; Thompson, D.V.; Sutton, M.Y.; Hickson, D.A. The Associations of Resilience and HIV Risk Behaviors among Black Gay, Bisexual, Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in the Deep South: The MARI Study. AIDS Behav. 2018, 22, 1679–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Y.; Bleasdale, J.; Przybyla, S.; Higgins, M.C.; Zhang, C. Racial Variations in Psychosocial Vulnerabilities Linked to Differential Poppers Use and Associated HIV-Related Outcomes among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Study in Two U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Subst. Use Misuse 2022, 57, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Babel, R.A.; Wang, P.; Alessi, E.J.; Raymond, H.F.; Wei, C. Stigma, HIV Risk, and Access to HIV Prevention and Treatment Services among Men Who have Sex with Men (MSM) in the United States: A Scoping Review. AIDS Behav. 2021, 25, 3574–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dubov, A.; Galbo, P., Jr.; Altice, F.L.; Fraenkel, L. Stigma and Shame Experiences by MSM Who Take PrEP for HIV Prevention: A Qualitative Study. Am. J. Men’s Health 2018, 12, 1843–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hecht, J.; Sanchez, T.; Sullivan, P.S.; DiNenno, E.A.; Cramer, N.; Delaney, K.P. Increasing Access to HIV Testing Through Direct-to-Consumer HIV Self-Test Distribution—United States, March 31, 2020–March 30, 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1322–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kurth, A.E.; Lally, M.A.; Choko, A.T.; Inwani, I.W.; Fortenberry, J.D. HIV testing and linkage to services for youth. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2015, 18, 19433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chamie, G.; Napierala, S.; Agot, K.; Thirumurthy, H. HIV testing approaches to reach the first UNAIDS 95% target in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet HIV 2021, 8, e225–e236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wallace, S.A.; McLellan-Lemal, E.; Harris, M.J.; Townsend, T.G.; Miller, K.S. Why take an HIV test? Concerns, benefits, and strategies to promote HIV testing among low-income heterosexual African American young adults. Health Educ. Behav. 2011, 38, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Results of the Expanded HIV Testing Initiative—25 jurisdictions, United States, 2007–2010. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2011, 60, 805–810. [Google Scholar]
  13. Amaro, H.; Morrill, A.C.; Dai, J.; Cabral, H.; Raj, A. Heterosexual behavioral maintenance and change following HIV counseling and testing. J. Health Psychol. 2005, 10, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. MacCarthy, S.; Wagner, Z.; Barreras, J.L.; Kim, A.; Menodza-Graf, A.C.; Giguere, R.; Carballo-Dieguez, A.; Linnemayr, S. Brief Report: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase HIV Knowledge and Testing among Latinx Sexual Minority Men and Transgender Women: A Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2020, 85, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Muessig, K.E.; Golinkoff, J.M.; Hightow-Weidman, L.B.; Rochelle, A.E.; Mulawa, M.I.; Hirshfield, S.; Rosengren, A.L.; Aryal, S.; Buckner, N.; Wilson, M.S.; et al. Increasing HIV Testing and Viral Suppression via Stigma Reduction in a Social Networking Mobile Health Intervention among Black and Latinx Young Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men (HealthMpowerment): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2020, 9, e24043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Frye, V.; Nandi, V.; Paige, M.Q.; McCrossin, J.; Lucy, D.; Gwadz, M.; Sullivan, P.S.; Hoover, D.R.; Wilton, L. TRUST: Assessing the Efficacy of an Intervention to Increase HIV Self-Testing among Young Black Men Who have Sex with Men (MSM) and Transwomen. AIDS Behav. 2021, 25, 1219–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Horvath, K.J.; Lammert, S.; Danh, T.; Mitchell, J.W. The Feasibility, Acceptability and Preliminary Impact of Mobile Application to Increase Repeat HIV Testing among Sexual Minority Men. AIDS Behav. 2020, 24, 1835–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Mitchell, J.; Liu, Y. Evidence and implication of interventions across various socioecological levels to address HIV testing uptake among men who have sex with men in the United States: A systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2022, 10, 20503121221107126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Laanani, M.; Dozol, A.; Meyer, L.; David, S.; Camara, S.; Segouin, C.; Troude, P. Factors associated with failure to return for HIV test results in a free and anonymous screening centre. Int. J. STD AIDS 2015, 26, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wimonsate, W.; Naorat, S.; Varangrat, A.; Phanuphak, P.; Kanggarnrua, K.; McNicholl, J.; Akarasewi, P.; van Griensven, F. Factors associated with HIV testing history and returning for HIV test results among men who have sex with men in Thailand. AIDS Behav. 2011, 15, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Young, S.D.; Cumberland, W.G.; Lee, S.J.; Jaganath, D.; Szekeres, G.; Coates, T. Social networking technologies as an emerging tool for HIV prevention: A cluster randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013, 159, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chan, E.; McNulty, A.; Tribe, K. Who returns for HIV screening test results? Int. J. STD AIDS 2007, 18, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Defo, D.; Kouotou, E.A.; Nansseu, J.R. Failure to return to receive HIV-test results: The Cameroon experience. BMC Res. Notes 2017, 10, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Rolland, C.; de La Rochebrochard, E.; Piron, P.; Shelly, M.; Segouin, C.; Troude, P. Who fails to return within 30 days after being tested positive for HIV/STI in a free testing centre? BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mugabe, D.; Bhatt, N.; Carlucci, J.G.; Gudo, E.S.; Gong, W.; Sidat, M.; Moon, T.D. Self-reported non-receipt of HIV test results: A silent barrier to HIV epidemic control in Mozambique. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gutiérrez, E.; Iglesias, M.C.; Quezada-Juarez, F.J.; Rodríguez-Estrada, E.; Reyes-Terán, G.; Caballero-Suárez, N.P. Why individuals fail to collect HIV-test results: An exploratory study at a testing and counseling center in Mexico City. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 2018, 42, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Liu, Y.; Brown, L.; Przybyla, S.; Bleasdale, J.; Mitchell, J.; Zhang, C. Characterizing Racial Differences of Mental Health Burdens, Psychosocial Determinants, and Impacts on HIV Prevention Outcomes among Young Men Who have Sex with Men: A Community-based Study in Two U.S. Cities. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2021, 9, 1114–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blumberg, S.J.; Bialostosky, K.; Hamilton, W.L.; Briefel, R.R. The effectiveness of a short form of the Household Food Security Scale. Am. J. Public Health 1999, 89, 1231–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sherbourne, C.D.; Stewart, A.L. The MOS social support survey. Soc. Sci. Med. 1991, 32, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Campbell-Sills, L.; Stein, M.B. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J. Trauma. Stress 2007, 20, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mansergh, G.; Spikes, P.; Flores, S.A.; Koblin, B.A.; McKirnan, D.; Hudson, S.M.; Colfax, G.N. Internalised homophobia is differentially associated with sexual risk behaviour by race/ethnicity and HIV serostatus among substance-using men who have sex with men in the United States. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2015, 91, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Osman, A.; Bagge, C.L.; Gutierrez, P.M.; Konick, L.C.; Kopper, B.A.; Barrios, F.X. The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): Validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment 2001, 8, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Reinius, M.; Wettergren, L.; Wiklander, M.; Svedhem, V.; Ekström, A.M.; Eriksson, L.E. Development of a 12-item short version of the HIV stigma scale. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2017, 15, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hays, R.D.; DiMatteo, M.R. A short-form measure of loneliness. J. Pers. Assess. 1987, 51, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Spitzer, R.L.; Kroenke, K.; Williams, J.B.; Löwe, B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 1092–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kroenke, K.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001, 16, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cohen, S.; Kamarck, T.; Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1983, 24, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jamil, M.S.; Guy, R.J.; Bavinton, B.R.; Fairley, C.K.; Grulich, A.E.; Holt, M.; Smith, K.S.; Chen, M.; McNulty, A.M.; Conway, D.P.; et al. HIV testing self-efficacy is associated with higher HIV testing frequency and perceived likelihood to self-test among gay and bisexual men. Sex. Health 2017, 14, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Brafford, L.J.; Beck, K.H. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. J. Am. Coll. Health 1991, 39, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ngangue, P.; Bedard, E.; Zomahoun, H.T.; Payne-Gagnon, J.; Fournier, C.; Afounde, J.; Gagnon, M.P. Returning for HIV Test Results: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2016, 2016, 6304820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peltzer, K.; Matseke, G.; Mzolo, T.; Majaja, M. Determinants of knowledge of HIV status in South Africa: Results from a population-based HIV survey. BMC Public Health 2009, 9, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sesay, C.; Chien, L.Y. Analysis of factors associated with failure to return for an HIV-test result in The Gambia. Afr. J. AIDS Res. 2012, 11, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xu, J.; Brown, K.; Ding, G.; Wang, H.; Zhang, G.; Reilly, K.; Li, Q.; Wang, G.; Wang, N. Factors associated with HIV testing history and HIV-test result follow-up among female sex workers in two cities in Yunnan, China. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2011, 38, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Zakher, B.; Blazina, I.; Chou, R. Association between knowledge of HIV-positive status or use of antiretroviral therapy and high-risk transmission behaviors: Systematic review. AIDS Care 2014, 26, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Outlaw, A.Y.; Naar-King, S.; Parsons, J.T.; Green-Jones, M.; Janisse, H.; Secord, E. Using motivational interviewing in HIV field outreach with young African American men who have sex with men: A randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100 (Suppl. S1), S146–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nabukenya, A.M.; Matovu, J.K.B. Correlates of HIV status awareness among older adults in Uganda: Results from a nationally representative survey. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. MacKellar, D.A.; Valleroy, L.A.; Secura, G.M.; Behel, S.; Bingham, T.; Celentano, D.D.; Koblin, B.A.; Lalota, M.; McFarland, W.; Shehan, D.; et al. Unrecognized HIV infection, risk behaviors, and perceptions of risk among young men who have sex with men: Opportunities for advancing HIV prevention in the third decade of HIV/AIDS. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2005, 38, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Garofalo, R.; Hotton, A.L.; Kuhns, L.M.; Gratzer, B.; Mustanski, B. Incidence of HIV Infection and Sexually Transmitted Infections and Related Risk Factors among Very Young Men Who Have Sex with Men. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2016, 72, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Newcomb, M.E.; Macapagal, K.R.; Feinstein, B.A.; Bettin, E.; Swann, G.; Whitton, S.W. Integrating HIV Prevention and Relationship Education for Young Same-Sex Male Couples: A Pilot Trial of the 2GETHER Intervention. AIDS Behav. 2017, 21, 2464–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meyer, I.H. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol. Bull. 2003, 129, 674–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, Y.T.; Duncan, D.T.; Issema, R.; Goedel, W.C.; Callander, D.; Bernard-Herman, B.; Hanson, H.; Eavou, R.; Schneider, J.; Hotton, A. Social-Environmental Resilience, PrEP Uptake, and Viral Suppression among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men and Young Black Transgender Women: The Neighborhoods and Networks (N2) Study in Chicago. J. Urban Health 2020, 97, 728–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Marmot, M.; Friel, S.; Bell, R.; Houweling, T.A.; Taylor, S. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet 2008, 372, 1661–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bush, M. Addressing the Root Cause: Rising Health Care Costs and Social Determinants of Health. N. C. Med. J. 2018, 79, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Dean, H.D.; Fenton, K.A. Addressing social determinants of health in the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted infections, and tuberculosis. Public Health Rep. 2010, 125 (Suppl. S4), 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Massari, V.; Lapostolle, A.; Cadot, E.; Parizot, I.; Dray-Spira, R.; Chauvin, P. Gender, socio-economic status, migration origin and neighbourhood of residence are barriers to HIV testing in the Paris metropolitan area. AIDS Care 2011, 23, 1609–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Sharpe, J.D.; Guest, J.L.; Siegler, A.J.; Sanchez, T.H.; Sullivan, P.S. The spatiotemporal distribution of pre-exposure prophylaxis accessibility in the United States, 2016–2020. Ann. Epidemiol. 2021, 64, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, Y.; Mitchell, J.W.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y. Evidence and implication of interventions across various socioecological levels to address pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and adherence among men who have sex with men in the United States: A systematic review. AIDS Res. Ther. 2022, 19, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Harrison, S.E.; Paton, M.; Muessig, K.E.; Vecchio, A.C.; Hanson, L.A.; Hightow-Weidman, L.B. “Do I want PrEP or do I want a roof?”: Social determinants of health and HIV prevention in the southern United States. AIDS Care 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Reback, C.J.; Ferlito, D.; Kisler, K.A.; Fletcher, J.B. Recruiting, Linking, and Retaining High-risk Transgender Women into HIV Prevention and Care Services: An Overview of Barriers, Strategies, and Lessons Learned. Int. J. Transgend. 2015, 16, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Geter, A.; Herron, A.R.; Sutton, M.Y. HIV-Related Stigma by Healthcare Providers in the United States: A Systematic Review. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2018, 32, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Traversy, G.P.; Austin, T.; Ha, S.; Timmerman, K.; Gale-Rowe, M. An overview of recent evidence on barriers and facilitators to HIV testing. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 2015, 41, 302–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics by the status of HIV test result follow-up among young men who have sex with men in two U.S. cities (N = 347).
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics by the status of HIV test result follow-up among young men who have sex with men in two U.S. cities (N = 347).
CharacteristicsTotal (N = 347)
n (%)		Not Always (N = 94)
n (%)		Always (N = 253)
n (%)		p Value
Age 0.0005
    <25147 (42.4)54 (57.4)93 (36.8)
    ≥25200 (57.6)40 (42.6)160 (63.2)
Race 0.1716
    White109 (31.4)30 (31.9)79 (31.2)
    Black or African American209 (60.2)52 (55.3)157 (62.1)
    Other a29 (8.4)12 (12.8)17 (6.7)
Education <.0001
    High school diploma or less71 (20.5)34 (36.2)37 (14.6)
    Some college138 (39.8)38 (40.4)100 (39.5)
    College degree or higher138 (39.8)22 (23.4)116 (45.8)
Employment 0.0809
    Employed243 (70.0)61 (64.9)182 (71.9)
    Unemployed51 (14.7)12 (12.8)39 (15.4)
    Student53 (15.3)21 (22.3)32 (12.6)
Income 0.0109
    Less than $20,000144 (41.5)49 (52.1)95 (37.5)
    $20,000 to less than $40,000132 (38.0)24 (25.5)108 (42.7)
    $40,000 or more71 (20.5)21 (22.3)50 (19.8)
Insurance 0.0094
    No65 (18.7)26 (27.7)39 (15.4)
    Yes282 (81.3)68 (72.3)214 (84.6)
Sexual orientation 0.0002
    Gay/homosexual267 (76.9)60 (63.8)207 (81.8)
    Heterosexual32 (9.2)18 (19.1)14 (5.5)
    Bisexual48 (13.8)16 (17.0)32 (12.6)
HIV risk perception 0.0543
    High/very high271 (78.1)80 (85.1)191 (75.5)
    No/low 76 (21.9)14 (14.9)62 (24.5)
Sexual orientation disclosure to healthcare professionals <0.0001
    No82 (23.6)37 (39.4)45 (17.8)
    Yes265 (76.4)57 (60.6)208 (82.2)
Venues to find sex partners <0.0001
    Gay-frequented venues61 (17.6)9 (9.6)52 (20.6)
    Internet/website55 (15.9)29 (30.9)26 (10.3)
    Social media app231 (66.6)56 (59.6)175 (69.2)
[a] Including Hispanic/Latino, Asian, and not sure.
Table
Table 2. Association of risk behaviors and inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results among young men who have sex with men in two U.S. cities (N = 347).
Table 2. Association of risk behaviors and inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results among young men who have sex with men in two U.S. cities (N = 347).
CharacteristicsTotal (N = 347)
n (%)		Not Always
(N = 94)
n (%)		Always (N = 253)
n (%)		aOR (95% CI) a
Condomless receptive anal sex with a man in the past six months
    No146 (42.9)33 (36.7)113 (45.2)Reference
    Yes194 (57.1)57 (63.3)137 (54.8)2.05 (1.13, 3.69)
Condomless insertive anal sex with a man in the past six months
    No137 (40.4)35 (38.9)102 (41.0)Reference
    Yes202 (59.6)55 (61.1)147 (59.0)1.37 (0.78, 2.43)
Group sex with other men in the past six months
    No243 (71.5)59 (65.6)184 (73.6)Reference
    Yes97 (28.5)31 (34.4)66 (26.4)2.03 (1.12, 3.68)
Condomless sex with HIV-positive men in the past six months
    No258 (77.9)64 (76.2)194 (78.5)Reference
    Yes73 (22.1)20 (23.8)53 (21.5)1.56 (0.80, 3.03)
Alcohol use before or during sex with a man in the past six months
    No143 (41.2)46 (48.9)97 (38.3)Reference
    Yes204 (58.8)48 (51.1)156 (61.7)1.03 (0.58, 1.83)
Recreational drug use before or during sex with a man in the past six months b
    No207 (59.7)50 (53.2)157 (62.1)Reference
    Yes140 (40.3)44 (46.8)96 (37.9)1.82 (1.05, 3.14)
Current tobacco use in the past 12 months c
    No89 (25.6)22 (23.4)67 (26.5)Reference
    Yes258 (74.4)72 (76.6)186 (73.5)1.41 (0.76, 2.59)
Alcohol binge in the past 12 months d
    No100 (28.8)26 (27.7)74 (29.2)Reference
    Yes247 (71.2)68 (72.3)179 (70.8)0.97 (0.55, 1.71)
Recreational drug use in the past 12 months b
    No66 (19.0)21 (22.3)45 (17.8)Reference
    Yes281 (81.0)73 (77.7)208 (82.2)1.02 (0.53, 1.96)
[a] Separate logistic regression models were built to assess correlates of inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results with each behavioral determinant as the primary independent variable. Each model individually adjusted for age, education, annual personal income, and sexual orientation; [b] Recreational drug use: self-report intake of rush poppers (alkyl nitrites), crystal meth (methamphetamine), marijuana, hallucinogens (ketamine, LSD, PCP, etc.), cocaine, heroin or other opioids, Magu (a mixture of methamphetamine and caffeine), opium, triazolam tablets (benzodiazepines), or ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, MDMA); [c] Tobacco use: intake or smoking (even a puff) the products including regular cigarette, e-cigarette, bidi, cigar, hookah, pipe, dip, chewing tobacco, dissolvable, snuff, or snus; [d] Binge drinking: having six or more standard drinks (i.e., 12 ounces (one can) of beer (5% alcohol), 6 ounces (1 glass) of wine (12% alcohol), 1.5 ounces (1 shot) of liquor (40% alcohol)) during a drinking occasion.
Table
Table 3. Association of psychosocial factors and inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results among young men who have sex with men in two U.S. cities (N=347).
Table 3. Association of psychosocial factors and inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results among young men who have sex with men in two U.S. cities (N=347).
CharacteristicsTotal (N = 347)
n (%)		Not Always (N = 94)
n (%)		Always (N = 253)
n (%)		aOR (95% CI) a
Housing stability, median (IQR)9 (7–10)8 (5–10)9 (8–10)0.87 (0.80, 0.96)
Food insecurity, median (IQR)0 (0–4)2 (0–4)0 (0–3)1.12 (1.00, 1.26)
Social support, median (IQR)75 (57–90)66 (56–76)76 (58–93)0.98 (0.97, 0.99)
Resilience, median (IQR)29 (23–35)26 (21–31)30 (24–36)0.96 (0.94, 0.99)
Internalized homophobia, median (IQR)5 (4–10)6 (4–12)4 (4–9)1.08 (1.02, 1.15)
Suicidal thoughts/behaviors, median (IQR)5 (3–8)4 (3–9)5 (3–7)1.02 (0.94, 1.11)
HIV-related stigma, median (IQR)30 (24–36)32 (25–36)30 (24–36)1.01 (0.98, 1.04)
Loneliness, median (IQR)19 (16–23)20 (15–23)19 (16–23)1.02 (0.97, 1.08)
Anxiety
    Low risk of anxiety224 (64.6)57 (60.6)167 (66.0)Reference
    High risk of anxiety123 (35.4)37 (39.4)86 (34.0)1.13 (0.65, 1.94)
Depression
    Low risk of depression158 (45.5)40 (42.6)118 (46.6)Reference
    High risk of depression189 (54.5)54 (57.4)135 (53.4)1.40 (0.83, 2.37)
Stress
    Low risk of stress70 (20.2)6 (6.4)64 (25.3)Reference
    High risk of stress277 (79.8)88 (93.6)189 (74.7)4.49 (1.82, 11.12)
[a] Separate logistic regression models were built to assess correlates of inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results with each psychosocial determinant as the primary independent variable. Each model individually adjusted for age, education, annual personal income, and sexual orientation.
Table
Table 4. Association of inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results and HIV prevention measures among young men who have sex with men in two U.S. cities (N = 347).
Table 4. Association of inconsistent follow-up on HIV test results and HIV prevention measures among young men who have sex with men in two U.S. cities (N = 347).
HIV Prevention MeasuresTotal (N = 347)
n (%)		Not Always (N = 94)
n (%)		Always (N = 253)
n (%)		aOR (95% CI) a
PrEP awareness
    No66 (19.0)36 (38.3)30 (11.9)Reference
    Yes281 (81.0)58 (61.7)223 (88.1)0.37 (0.17, 0.79)
PrEP use (ever)
    No231 (66.6)73 (77.7)158 (62.5)Reference
    Yes116 (33.4)21 (22.3)95 (37.5)0.82 (0.44, 1.55)
Home testing (ever)
    No247 (71.2)63 (67.0)184 (72.7)Reference
    Yes100 (28.8)31 (33.0)69 (27.3)1.52 (0.85, 2.74)
HIV testing in the past 12 months
    No66 (19.0)38 (40.4)28 (11.1)Reference
    Yes281 (81.0)56 (59.6)225 (88.9)0.14 (0.07, 0.27)
HIV testing in the past 6 months
    No92 (26.5)41 (43.6)51 (20.2)Reference
    Yes255 (73.5)53 (56.4)202 (79.8)0.26 (0.14, 0.45)
HIV testing in the past 3 months
    No128 (36.9)48 (51.1)80 (31.6)Reference
    Yes219 (63.1)46 (48.9)173 (68.4)0.43 (0.25, 0.73)
HIV testing confidence
    No197 (56.8)73 (77.7)124 (49.0)Reference
    Yes150 (43.2)21 (22.3)129 (51.0)0.30 (0.16, 0.53)
Condom use self-efficacy
    No187 (53.9)60 (63.8)127 (50.2)Reference
    Yes160 (46.1)34 (36.2)126 (49.8)0.54 (0.32, 0.92)
[a] Separate logistic regression models were built to assess the effects of discontinuity in knowledge of HIV testing status on HIV prevention outcomes with inconsistent HIV test result follow-up as the primary independent variable. Each model individually adjusted for age, education, annual personal income, and sexual orientation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Mitchell, J.; Zhang, C.; Brown, L.; Przybyla, S.; Liu, Y. Suboptimal Follow-Up on HIV Test Results among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Community-Based Study in Two U.S. Cities. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7070139

AMA Style

Wang Y, Mitchell J, Zhang C, Brown L, Przybyla S, Liu Y. Suboptimal Follow-Up on HIV Test Results among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Community-Based Study in Two U.S. Cities. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022; 7(7):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7070139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ying, Jason Mitchell, Chen Zhang, Lauren Brown, Sarahmona Przybyla, and Yu Liu. 2022. "Suboptimal Follow-Up on HIV Test Results among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Community-Based Study in Two U.S. Cities" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 7, no. 7: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7070139

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop