Next Article in Journal
Malaria Vector Surveillance and Control in an Elimination Setting in South Africa
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of COVID-19 Quarantine on Tuberculosis and Diabetes Mellitus Cases: A Modelling Study
Previous Article in Journal
One Health: An Effective and Ethical Approach to Leptospirosis Control in Australia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arbovirus Seroprevalence Study in Bangphae District, Ratchaburi Province, Thailand: Comparison between ELISA and a Multiplex Rapid Diagnostic Test (Chembio DPP® ZCD IgG)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Role of Arbovirus Infection in Arthritogenic Pain Manifestation—A Systematic Review

by
Rafaella de Carvalho Cardoso
1,
Bismarck Rezende
2,
Allan Kardec Nogueira Alencar
3,
Fabrícia Lima Fontes-Dantas
2 and
Guilherme Carneiro Montes
2,*
1
Healthy Sciences School, Brazilian Institute of Medicine and Rehabilitation (IBMR), Rio de Janeiro 22631-002, Brazil
2
Department of Pharmacology and Psychobiology, Roberto Alcântara Gomes Institute Biology (IBRAG), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro 20551-030, Brazil
3
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7(11), 390; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7110390
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022

Abstract

:
The number of publications on the development of arthritic pain after CHIKV infection is increasing; however, there is still a gap in the pathophysiological mechanisms that explain these outcomes. In this review, we conducted a descriptive analysis of the findings of patients to understand their prognosis and to explore therapeutic options. Here, we searched the Cochrane, BVS, PubMed, and Scielo databases using the keywords “arthritis”, “pain”, “arbovirus”, “disease”, “arthritogenic”, and “arthralgia” during the 2000 to 2022 period. Descriptive analyses were conducted to understand the association between CHIKV infection and arthritogenic pain. The present study shows the persistence of acute phase signals for months, making the chronic phase still marked by the presence of arthralgia, often disabling under stimuli, such as temperature variation. CHIKV infection appears to be remarkably similar to rheumatoid arthritis, since both diseases share common symptoms. Once diagnosed, patients are mostly treated with analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). As there are no prophylactic measures or specific treatments for arboviruses, this study gathered information on the development and manifestations of arthritogenic pain.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Viral infections with unpredictable clinical outcomes occur frequently worldwide. To date, 87 countries have reported autochthonous transmission of arbovirus [1]. An example is the epidemics of arboviruses Zika (ZIKV) and Chikungunya (CHIKV) that occurred in Brazil in recent years, becoming endemic and causing irreparable damage to the population [2,3]. While more than 80% of cases of ZIKV infection are asymptomatic or have very mild symptoms, this relationship is practically reversed in relation to CHIKV infection, which is usually symptomatic [4,5,6,7]. In addition to the clinical manifestations that are central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS)-specific [8,9], nonspecific neurological and/or rheumatological symptoms, such as myalgia, hypogeusia, articular pain, and general malaise, have been reported in patients after CHIKV infection [3,10,11]. Interestingly, it has been observed that the main symptoms of CHIKV infection do not differ between sexes. Nevertheless, the symptomatologic profile might vary from case to case depending on the preexistence of comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis, and advanced age [12,13,14]. Persistent joint pain is a common manifestation of arthropod-borne viral infections and can cause long-term disability, although the precise mechanisms of Chikungunya disease progression from acute fever to the chronic phase and its correlation with arthralgia remain poorly understood [8,15].
The immune process linked to articular pain is triggered, at least in part, by post-infectious inflammation [16]. Notably, acute symptomatic CHIKV disease resembles other common known arbovirus-induced diseases, such as dengue virus (DENV) and ZIKV disease, independent of strain [17]. In this context, physicians tend to identify similarities in the clinical onset of rheumatoid arthritis after infection by CHIKV, Dengue fever virus, Yellow Fever virus, and Zika virus, and it is believed that the mechanisms involved in the chronicity of both diseases are similar [18,19]. Indeed, the inflammation induced by the presence of the virus in the joints has been implicated as a key factor for the development of acute and chronic polyarthritis following alphavirus infection [15]; however, the severity of this manifestation is based not only on viral tissue tropism but also on a possible autoimmune response [20]. Vijayalakshmi et al., 2017, showed that molecular mimicry between viral protein E1 and host proteins contributes to the development of arthritic manifestations by CHIKV through increased immune and inflammatory responses [21]. Another important study identified conserved regions of the alphavirus structural polyprotein that are homologous to human proteins involved in rheumatoid arthritis, which can be recognized by B cells and the MHC class II receptor [22].
Furthermore, some studies have suggested a neuropathic component of arthritogenic pain [8, 23, 24, 25, 26]. Other lines of evidence concern the involvement of nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms in arbovirus infection [27,28]. Neuropathic pain is usually caused by injuries that damage somatosensory pathways from peripheral nerves to central structures, including the spinal cord and brain [29]. Importantly, CHIKV infection might promote demyelination, the most typical injury that harms the entire structure of a peripheral nerve [26]. Given that there are no effective prevention methods or treatments for arboviral diseases, the aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to advance the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of arboviruses-induced joint pain and to identify methods for diagnosis and treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the number protocol: CRD42022367576, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (accessed on 1 November 2022). Additionally, this work was written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

2.1. Search Strategy

A literature search was conducted using five databases to identify studies that examined the association between arbovirus infections and arthritic pain. The main terms and expressions used in this research were arthritis, pain, and arbovirus. The following databases were used to perform a search: PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Cochrane (search tools strategies MeSH, PICO, and advanced search), and BVS, published between January 2000 and December 2020. For the systematization of the research question, the PICO strategy (PICO—patient, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) was used, where P (patient) was positive for arbovirus infections and arthritogenic pain; I (intervention) was drugs used in the treatment; C (comparison) was between patients who developed chronic pain and those who did not have persistent pain, and O (outcome) was relevant findings that could justify the appearance of signs and symptoms and the effectiveness of the methodology used for treatment. The GRADE approach was applied to assess the quality of evidence for the set of available evidence and important findings that corresponded to the research question. The data found and described were considered satisfactory and met the criteria for the GRADE approach. Two autonomous persons ran the survey in duplicate.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The object of interest this study was to collect research results that included studies of cohort, case–control, and clinical cases in human experimental models. Only files published in English were chosen for reading. Studies published in conferences, systematic and narrative reviews, or editorials were excluded. Duplicate quests were excluded from the study.
In addition, a considerable number of the selected studies presented as a primary patient outcome the manifestation of arthritogenic pain with increased levels of important pro-inflammatory molecules such interleukins (IL-6, IL-8, and IL-13), tumor necrose factor alpha (TNF-α), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 (MIP-1) in the analysis of synovial fluid from pain-affected joints. It has been further observed that pain was not present in all patients. However, in cases of pain manifestation, it persisted for days or even years. The different diagnostic methodologies (clinical and symptomatic approaches, direct analyses such as the PCR technique, or indirect analyses such as serological tests for IgG and IgM detection), as well as different therapeutic interventions (anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs), might be classified as secondary events and were not considered the focus of the current work.

2.3. Study Selection and Data Extraction

Two authors proceeded with the study selection and extracted the data independently by using the same predetermined data extraction patterns. After deleting duplicates and articles in languages other than English, two phases were completed. The first step was to appraise titles and abstracts for the selection of pertinent scientific articles that met the eligibility criteria. The second step consisted of a full-text reading of the articles approved in the first step to conduct a more complete judgment in compliance with the inclusion and exclusion survey criteria. A consensus was achieved in cases of disagreement between the authors. A third evaluator was not required. The following data were extracted and recorded: Table 1—author, year, country, ethnicity, study design, diagnosis, treatments, and relevant key findings. Quality control of eligible studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tools [30] for cohort and case–control studies by two independent authors (F.L.F.D or G.M.).

3. Results

Study Selection

Eighteen articles were selected according to the search strategy. After applying the eligibility criteria, three articles were identified as duplicates, two were identified as systematic reviews, and four articles were written using languages other than English and were thus excluded of the final pool of studies (Figure 1). In total and based on data availability, we screened 18 studies by the title and abstracts and included 10 articles for a review of the observational analyses. There were 1036 patients in the total articles included, and most were female. The mean age of the patients was 50 years (6–87). Serum anti-CHIKV IgM and anti-CHIKV IgG levels were reported in 151 patients and were positive in only 19 and 28 patients, respectively, according to Pouriayevali et al., 2019 [23].
According to our search criteria, most records reporting CHIKV with joint signs/symptoms were from the European region (n = 387), followed by the Americas (n = 351) and the Asian continent (n = 289). Information about the symptomatologic profile of patients was documented in all studies, and the most frequently found symptoms were fever, rash, headache, myalgia, joint swelling, and pain due to a local inflammatory reaction.
Arthralgia and joint/articular pain were found in 98% (297 cases) of patients, according to Bouquillard et al., 2018. The most affected joints were the shoulders (168/300), elbows (37/300), wrists (216/300), hips (3/300), (161/300), ankles (212/300), and tarsus (152/300), according to the same author [24]. Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis were excluded from the study due to the similarity of symptoms with chronic pain after arbovirus infection. The duration of arthritis ranged from 2 days to 6 months among the nine cases who reported the time. The median treatment duration was approximately 10 days.
Different drug combinations were used as therapeutic strategies for mitigating signs and symptoms of infection. Corticosteroids in the management of inflammatory arthritis were effective at moderate doses and were used in the acute and chronic phases. In both the acute and chronic phases, joint pain was well-controlled with the administration of analgesics and NSAIDs. For patients unresponsive to this regular treatment, chloroquine proved to be a valid option, as evidenced by Bouquillard et al., 2018, and Ravindran et al., 2016 [24,32]. Ravindran et al., 2016, also demonstrated the efficacy of a triple combination of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine, which was superior to that of hydroxychloroquine monotherapy. According to the author, this drug combination led to a considerable reduction in pain levels by suppressing the expression of some pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, TNF, MCP-1, and MIP-1, and for this reason, he considered triple therapy superior to monotherapy [32].
Bedoui et al., 2021, evaluated the expression levels of cPLA2α and mPGES-1 after therapy with methotrexate or dexamethasone. Methotrexate was not efficient in controlling the expression and activity of these enzymatic molecules; however, dexamethasone was shown to be able to normalize their levels [18].
An alternative method to drug treatment was pointed out by Ribeiro’s study, which used anti-inflammatory drugs and analgesics in parallel with the continuous local application of infrared laser, ultrasound, and TENS-burst. This article argues that the association between focal treatments using stimuli of different wave frequencies accelerates the healing process by collaborating in different ways in cell recovery, speed of nerve conduction, and collagen production and extensibility, which may reduce inflammation and, consequently, pain and arthritic stiffness [25].

4. Discussion

Although global concern has focused on the COVID-19 pandemic since 2020, arthropod-borne viruses continue to cause outbreaks. It is already known that arboviruses induce self-limiting symptoms in adults [3,32,36], and the occurrence of short- and long-term pain syndromes has become increasingly common in patients infected by the CHIKV [3,32,36]. The most common viruses causing arthritis and/or arthralgias are parvoviruses; hepatitis B virus; hepatitis C virus; Epstein–Barr virus (EBV); and tropical viruses, such as Dengue, Zika, and CHIKV [37,38].
Arthritis is defined as swelling and tenderness of one or more joints and involves inflammation, whereas arthralgia is a joint pain with no inflammatory cause [39,40]. Although both may share many symptoms, each condition also has distinctive characteristics that make them different [41]. CHIKV-induced arthritis involves joints and a common pattern of leukocyte infiltration (innate and adaptive immune response cells, such as monocytes and T and B cells), cytokine production, and complement activation and is closely dependent on the possible virus persistence on hidden sides [42,43].
In joints, macrophages, synovial cells, and chondrocytes produce the eicosanoid named prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which is an important pro-inflammatory molecule involved in bone erosion and pain [44]. Additional cytokines produced in this context are IL-1β and TNF-α, biomolecules that stimulate the synthesis of PGE2 and enhance its local concentration [8,16]. Since this inflammatory milieu is observed in the joints, NSAIDs are usually chosen as a therapeutic option. The general mechanism of action of NSAIDs is the inhibition of cyclooxygenases 1 and 2, enzymes involved in the synthesis of prostaglandins. NSAIDs are commonly used to treat inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatic disorders, and aid in relieving pain and fever [45,46].
Serological tests, and clinical signs and symptoms have proven to be the basic and regular methods for diagnosing arboviruses. Furthermore, Zika and Chikungunya are infections with a very similar manifestation, and the clinical diagnosis may not be sufficient to differentiate them, requiring testing by other methods [4].
The most commonly used tests for differential diagnosis in the identification of serum levels of anti-antibodies (anti-IgM and anti-IgG) are ELISA (Mac-ELISA) and RT-PCR [47]. In addition, by performing immunohistochemistry, Bedoui et al., 2018, labeled a wide variety of primary antibodies used in cell cultures of synovial biopsy (hygroma), which originated from one of the patients in the study who had been in the chronic phase of the disease for at least 18 months, with persistent pain and relapsing arthralgia in more than one small joint. Moreover, RT-PCR from total RNA extracted from the same cell culture was performed. To verify the possible cytotoxic effects of the treatment, lactate dehydrogenase release was measured in the supernatants of HSF cell cultures 24 h post-treatment [18].
In addition, Blettery et al., 2019, combined serological tests and RT-PCR with joint imaging data acquired by Doppler ultrasonography. The Doppler ultrasound of painful joints revealed effusions in 92.8% of the examined joints (hands and wrists, ankles, and knees were involved, but shoulders and elbows were rarely affected). The majority (75.5%) of effusions were unilateral. No erosion was observed. Subcutaneous inflammatory infiltration (cellulitis) was observed in only a minor proportion of the participants [22]. In summary, RT-PCR was used in all studies that mentioned a diagnostic method, even in association with other alternative methodologies. This was the molecular technique of choice for the direct detection of viral RNA, which showed greater specificity and assertiveness. The Zika and Chikungunya epidemic in 2014–2016 in Brazil boosted the repositioning of drugs for the treatment of only acute symptoms; however, the identification of strategies for the management of persistent pain is still incipient [48]. The treatment is usually performed with common analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen) [49], NSAIDs (e.g., aspirin and ibuprofen) [50], dexamethasone [18], hydroxychloroquine, and DMARDs [32] such as methotrexate. Methotrexate acts by multiple mechanisms [51,52]. It decreases the nitric oxide production, stimulates adenosine release, activates the adenosine receptor A2A (a physiological receptor with anti-inflammatory properties [53]), inhibits purine and pyrimidine synthesis, participates in transmethylation reactions, promotes the translocation of the nuclear factor-κB to the nucleus, and reduces the signaling pathway of the Janus kinase signal transducer and the transcription factor STAT [52,54,55]. Furthermore, other therapies, such as local applications of continuous ultrasound, infrared laser, and TENS-burst alone or in combination might be used as alternative or additional treatments [56,57]. Nevertheless, these techniques are only partially effective. Finally, according to the studies reviewed in this work, the risk of bias was considered low; most groups were heterogeneous; and patients were mostly female, despite having a variable age according to each study. Most cases were between 41 and 69 years old, and treatment efficiency measures were used in different ways, including morphological assessments; HAQ score; ultrasound; DAS28 ESR; X-ray; serological, immunological, and biochemical tests.

5. Conclusions

Conflicting explanations were found in the reviewed studies regarding the origin and causes of chronic arthritogenic pain in arbovirus infections. The serological and clinical examination results support that pro-inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α, and PGE2 may infiltrate the joints and generate symptoms similar to rheumatic arthritis. Furthermore, leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia are evidenced.
Antivirals such as ribavirin are cited as possible drugs to control the viral load in patients infected in the acute phase of the infection. Moreover, the use of aspirin and other NSAIDs has been suggested as symptomatic treatment for the chronic phase. There are no findings that clearly demonstrate the circumstances for the chronicity of arbovirus-induced arthritogenic pain. Therefore, research in this area is desperately needed for a better understanding and elucidation of the issues addressed in this systematic review.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.d.C.C. and B.R.; methodology, R.d.C.C. and B.R.; validation, R.d.C.C., B.R., F.L.F.-D. and G.C.M.; formal analysis, F.L.F.-D. and G.C.M.; investigation, R.d.C.C.; resources, R.d.C.C. and B.R.; data curation, R.d.C.C. and B.R.; writing original draft preparation, R.d.C.C. and B.R.; writing review and editing, A.K.N.A., F.L.F.-D. and G.C.M.; visualization, R.d.C.C., B.R., A.K.N.A., F.L.F.-D. and G.C.M.; supervision, F.L.F.-D. and G.C.M.; project administration, F.L.F.-D. and G.C.M.; funding acquisition, G.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro FAPERJ (E-26/211.795/2021). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for supporting.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wimalasiri-Yapa, B.; Yapa, H.E.; Huang, X.; Hafner, L.M.; Kenna, T.J.; Frentiu, F.D. Zika Virus and Arthritis/Arthralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Viruses 2020, 12, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Waggoner, J.J.; Gresh, L.; Vargas, M.J.; Ballesteros, G.; Tellez, Y.; Soda, K.J.; Sahoo, M.K.; Nunez, A.; Balmaseda, A.; Harris, E.; et al. Viremia and Clinical Presentation in Nicaraguan Patients Infected With Zika Virus, Chikungunya Virus, and Dengue Virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 1584–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Tritsch, S.R.; Encinales, L.; Pacheco, N.; Cadena, A.; Cure, C.; McMahon, E.; Watson, H.; Porras Ramirez, A.; Mendoza, A.R.; Li, G.; et al. Chronic Joint Pain 3 Years after Chikungunya Virus Infection Largely Characterized by Relapsing-remitting Symptoms. J. Rheumatol. 2020, 47, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Azeredo, E.L.; Dos Santos, F.B.; Barbosa, L.S.; Souza, T.M.A.; Badolato-Corrêa, J.; Sánchez-Arcila, J.C.; Nunes, P.C.G.; de-Oliveira-Pinto, L.M.; de Filippis, A.M.; Dal Fabbro, M.; et al. Clinical and Laboratory Profile of Zika and Dengue Infected Patients: Lessons Learned From the Co-circulation of Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya in Brazil. PLoS Curr. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Young, P.R. Arboviruses: A Family on the Move. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1062, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brito Ferreira, M.L.; Militão de Albuquerque, M.F.P.; de Brito, C.A.A.; de Oliveira França, R.F.; Porto Moreira, Á.J.; de Morais Machado, M.; da Paz Melo, R.; Medialdea-Carrera, R.; Dornelas Mesquita, S.; Lopes Santos, M.; et al. Neurological disease in adults with Zika and chikungunya virus infection in Northeast Brazil: A prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 826–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Burt, F.J.; Chen, W.; Miner, J.J.; Lenschow, D.J.; Merits, A.; Schnettler, E.; Kohl, A.; Rudd, P.A.; Taylor, A.; Herrero, L.J.; et al. Chikungunya virus: An update on the biology and pathogenesis of this emerging pathogen. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e107–e117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Burt, F.J.; Rolph, M.S.; Rulli, N.E.; Mahalingam, S.; Heise, M.T. Chikungunya: A re-emerging virus. Lancet 2012, 379, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alves-Leon, S.V.; Ferreira, C.D.S.; Herlinger, A.L.; Fontes-Dantas, F.L.; Rueda-Lopes, F.C.; Francisco, R.D.S., Jr.; Goncalves, J.; de Araujo, A.D.; Rego, C.; Higa, L.M.; et al. Exome-Wide Search for Genes Associated With Central Nervous System Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases Following CHIKV Infection: The Tip of the Iceberg. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 639364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rueda-Lopes, F.C.; da Cruz, L.C.H.; Fontes, F.L.; Herlinger, A.L.; da Costa Ferreira Junior, O.; de Aguiar, R.S.; Vasconcelos, C.C.F.; do Nascimento, O.J.M.; Alves-Leon, S.V. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging patterns of extensive Chikungunya virus-associated myelitis. J. Neurovirol. 2021, 27, 616–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, R.; Shrivastava, T.; Samal, S.; Ahmed, S.; Parray, H.A. Antibody-based therapeutic interventions: Possible strategy to counter chikungunya viral infection. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 3209–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. de Almeida Barreto, F.K.; Montenegro, R.M., Jr.; Fernandes, V.O.; Oliveira, R.; de Araujo Batista, L.A.; Hussain, A.; de Goes Cavalcanti, L.P. Chikungunya and diabetes, what do we know? Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2018, 10, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kiely, P.D.W.; Lloyd, M.E. Ankle arthritis—An important signpost in rheumatologic practice. Rheumatology 2021, 60, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Benjamanukul, S.; Osiri, M.; Chansaenroj, J.; Chirathaworn, C.; Poovorawan, Y. Rheumatic manifestations of Chikungunya virus infection: Prevalence, patterns, and enthesitis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zaid, A.; Gerardin, P.; Taylor, A.; Mostafavi, H.; Malvy, D.; Mahalingam, S. Chikungunya Arthritis: Implications of Acute and Chronic Inflammation Mechanisms on Disease Management. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018, 70, 484–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pathak, H.; Mohan, M.C.; Ravindran, V. Chikungunya arthritis. Clin. Med. 2019, 19, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. de Lima Cavalcanti, T.Y.V.; Pereira, M.R.; de Paula, S.O.; Franca, R.F.O. A Review on Chikungunya Virus Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Current Vaccine Development. Viruses 2022, 14, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bedoui, Y.; Septembre-Malaterre, A.; Giry, C.; Jaffar-Bandjee, M.C.; Selambarom, J.; Guiraud, P.; Gasque, P. Robust COX-2-mediated prostaglandin response may drive arthralgia and bone destruction in patients with chronic inflammation post-chikungunya. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pineda, C.; Munoz-Louis, R.; Caballero-Uribe, C.V.; Viasus, D. Chikungunya in the region of the Americas. A challenge for rheumatologists and health care systems. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016, 35, 2381–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Venigalla, S.S.K.; Premakumar, S.; Janakiraman, V. A possible role for autoimmunity through molecular mimicry in alphavirus mediated arthritis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reddy, V.; Desai, A.; Krishna, S.S.; Vasanthapuram, R. Molecular Mimicry between Chikungunya Virus and Host Components: A Possible Mechanism for the Arthritic Manifestations. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Blettery, M.; Brunier, L.; Banydeen, R.; Derancourt, C.; de Bandt, M. Management of acute-stage chikungunya disease: Contribution of ultrasonographic joint examination. Int. J. Infect. Dis. IJID Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Infect. Dis. 2019, 84, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Pouriayevali, M.H.; Rezaei, F.; Jalali, T.; Baniasadi, V.; Fazlalipour, M.; Mostafavi, E.; Khakifirouz, S.; Mohammadi, T.; Fereydooni, Z.; Tavakoli, M.; et al. Imported cases of Chikungunya virus in Iran. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bouquillard, E.; Fianu, A.; Bangil, M.; Charlette, N.; Ribéra, A.; Michault, A.; Favier, F.; Simon, F.; Flipo, R.M. Rheumatic manifestations associated with Chikungunya virus infection: A study of 307 patients with 32-month follow-up (RHUMATOCHIK study). Jt. Bone Spine 2018, 85, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ribeiro, A.M.B.M.; Pimentel, C.M.; Guerra, A.C.C.G.; Lima, M.R.D.O. Physiotherapeutic approach on the late phase of chikungunya: A case report. Rev. Bras. Saúde Matern. Infant. 2016, 16, S51–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mostafavi, H.; Abeyratne, E.; Zaid, A.; Taylor, A. Arthritogenic Alphavirus-Induced Immunopathology and Targeting Host Inflammation as A Therapeutic Strategy for Alphaviral Disease. Viruses 2019, 11, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. de Andrade, D.C.; Jean, S.; Clavelou, P.; Dallel, R.; Bouhassira, D. Chronic pain associated with the Chikungunya Fever: Long lasting burden of an acute illness. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Brito, C.A.; Sohsten, A.K.; Leitao, C.C.; Brito, R.C.; Valadares, L.D.; Fonte, C.A.; Mesquita, Z.B.; Cunha, R.V.; Luz, K.; Leao, H.M.; et al. Pharmacologic management of pain in patients with Chikungunya: A guideline. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2016, 49, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bouhassira, D. Neuropathic pain: Definition, assessment and epidemiology. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 175, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Tools. Available online: https://casp-uk.net/glossary/systematic-review (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  31. Rosso, F.; Rodriguez, S.; Cedano, J.A.; Mora, B.L.; Moncada, P.A.; Velez, J.D. Chikungunya in solid organ transplant recipients, a case series and literature review. Transpl Infect Dis 2018, 20, e12978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ravindran, V.; Alias, G. Efficacy of combination DMARD therapy vs. hydroxychloroquine monotherapy in chronic persistent chikungunya arthritis: A 24-week randomized controlled open label study. Clin. Rheumatol. 2017, 36, 1335–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Agrawal, M.; Pandey, N.; Rastogi, M.; Dogra, S.; Singh, S.K. Chikungunya virus modulates the miRNA expression patterns in human synovial fibroblasts. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hoarau, J.J.; Jaffar Bandjee, M.C.; Krejbich Trotot, P.; Das, T.; Li-Pat-Yuen, G.; Dassa, B.; Denizot, M.; Guichard, E.; Ribera, A.; Henni, T.; et al. Persistent chronic inflammation and infection by Chikungunya arthritogenic alphavirus in spite of a robust host immune response. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 5914–5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lima, M.; de Lima, R.C.; de Azeredo, E.L.; Dos Santos, F.B. Analysis of a Routinely Used Commercial Anti-Chikungunya IgM ELISA Reveals Cross-Reactivities with Dengue in Brazil: A New Challenge for Differential Diagnosis? Diagnostics 2021, 11, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hua, C.; Combe, B. Chikungunya Virus-Associated Disease. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2017, 19, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tiwari, V.; Bergman, M.J. Viral Arthritis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  38. Laine, M.; Luukkainen, R.; Toivanen, A. Sindbis viruses and other alphaviruses as cause of human arthritic disease. J. Intern. Med. 2004, 256, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Deane, K.D.; Holers, V.M. Rheumatoid Arthritis Pathogenesis, Prediction, and Prevention: An Emerging Paradigm Shift. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021, 73, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. van Steenbergen, H.W.; Aletaha, D.; Beaart-van de Voorde, L.J.; Brouwer, E.; Codreanu, C.; Combe, B.; Fonseca, J.E.; Hetland, M.L.; Humby, F.; Kvien, T.K.; et al. EULAR definition of arthralgia suspicious for progression to rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ten Brinck, R.M.; van Steenbergen, H.W.; Mangnus, L.; Burgers, L.E.; Reijnierse, M.; Huizinga, T.W.; van der Helm-van Mil, A.H. Functional limitations in the phase of clinically suspect arthralgia are as serious as in early clinical arthritis; a longitudinal study. RMD Open 2017, 3, e000419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Amdekar, S.; Parashar, D.; Alagarasu, K. Chikungunya Virus-Induced Arthritis: Role of Host and Viral Factors in the Pathogenesis. Viral Immunol. 2017, 30, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chirathaworn, C.; Chansaenroj, J.; Poovorawan, Y. Cytokines and Chemokines in Chikungunya Virus Infection: Protection or Induction of Pathology. Pathogens 2020, 9, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. de Hair, M.J.; Leclerc, P.; Newsum, E.C.; Maijer, K.I.; van de Sande, M.G.; Ramwadhdoebe, T.H.; van Schaardenburg, D.; van Baarsen, L.G.; Korotkova, M.; Gerlag, D.M.; et al. Expression of Prostaglandin E2 Enzymes in the Synovium of Arthralgia Patients at Risk of Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis and in Early Arthritis Patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Crofford, L.J. Use of NSAIDs in treating patients with arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2013, 15 (Suppl. 3), S2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Bindu, S.; Mazumder, S.; Bandyopadhyay, U. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and organ damage: A current perspective. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 180, 114147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Piantadosi, A.; Kanjilal, S. Diagnostic Approach for Arboviral Infections in the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, R.; Ahmed, S.; Parray, H.A.; Das, S. Chikungunya and arthritis: An overview. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 44, 102168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kellstein, D.; Fernandes, L. Symptomatic treatment of dengue: Should the NSAID contraindication be reconsidered? Postgrad. Med. 2019, 131, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pan, T.; Peng, Z.; Tan, L.; Zou, F.; Zhou, N.; Liu, B.; Liang, L.; Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Wu, L.; et al. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Potently Inhibit the Replication of Zika Viruses by Inducing the Degradation of AXL. J. Virol. 2018, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Marin, G.E.; Neag, M.A.; Burlacu, C.C.; Buzoianu, A.D. The Protective Effects of Nutraceutical Components in Methotrexate-Induced Toxicity Models-An Overview. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Alqarni, A.M.; Zeidler, M.P. How does methotrexate work? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2020, 48, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Trevethick, M.A.; Mantell, S.J.; Stuart, E.F.; Barnard, A.; Wright, K.N.; Yeadon, M. Treating lung inflammation with agonists of the adenosine A2A receptor: Promises, problems and potential solutions. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 155, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Cronstein, B.N.; Aune, T.M. Methotrexate and its mechanisms of action in inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020, 16, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Harrington, R.; Al Nokhatha, S.A.; Conway, R. JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Evidence-Based Review on the Emerging Clinical Data. J. Inflamm. Res. 2020, 13, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gibson, W.; Wand, B.M.; Meads, C.; Catley, M.J.; O’Connell, N.E. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain—An overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 4, CD011890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Macedo, L.B.; Josue, A.M.; Maia, P.H.; Camara, A.E.; Brasileiro, J.S. Effect of burst TENS and conventional TENS combined with cryotherapy on pressure pain threshold: Randomised, controlled, clinical trial. Physiotherapy 2015, 101, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustrative flowchart of the rummage and article selection.
Figure 1. Illustrative flowchart of the rummage and article selection.
Tropicalmed 07 00390 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of observational studies evaluating the association between arthritogenic pain and CHIKV infection.
Table 1. Characteristics of observational studies evaluating the association between arthritogenic pain and CHIKV infection.
Author; YearCountryEthnicityStudy DesignDiagnosesTreatmentsRelevant Key Findings
F. Rosso et al., 2018 [31]ColombiaColombianCase Report and Literature ReviewNot mentionedCorticosteroids in the management of inflammatory arthritis Patients in this study underwent organ transplantation. Some of them developed leucopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, and all of them developed lymphopenia. None developed graft rejection or died in process.
E. Bouquillard et al., 2017 [24]FranceFrenchOriginal articleSerological test and clinical symptomsAfter the acute phase, joint pain is well-controlled with analgesics and NSAIDs; corticotherapy may be effective at moderate doses; and Chloroquine salt are sometimes prescribed, particularly in the case of chronic joints that are non-responsive to analgesics and NSAIDs. Chronic joint pain was associated with synovitis of the patients, affecting primarily the wrists, the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers, and the ankles. Attempts to detect the viral genome in joint fluid and synovial tissue using the RT-PCR technique were repeatedly unsuccessful.
Ravindran et al., 2016 [32]IndiaIndianOriginal articleClinical symptoms and serological testDMARD combination to Chikungunya arthritis (CA); triple combination with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine; monotherapy with hydroxychloroquineTreatment with combination therapy leads to substantial improvement and reduces disability and pain in CA; levels of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 IL-13, and TNF; (MCP)-1; and (MIP)-1 also appear to play important roles in the pathogenesis of CA. Triple therapy is superior than monotherapy.
M. Blettery et al., 2019 [22]FranceFrenchOriginal articleSerological tests or PCR, then joints imaging studies by Doppler ultrasonography (DUS)Not mentionedDUS of painful joints revealed effusions in 92.8%of them (unilateral). Subcutaneous inflammatory infiltrations of the ankles were revealed at 29% of patients. Bone erosion was not observed.
A. Ribeiro et al., 2016 [25] BrazilBrazilianCase ReportsClinical symptoms.Anti-inflammatory and analgesics drugs; in parallel, for local joints, applications include continuous ultrasound, infrared laser, and TENS-burstThe association of ultrasound, infrared laser, and TENS may accelerate the healing process by collaborating in different ways in cell recovery, speed of nerve conductions and collagen production, and extensibility. It could reduce inflammation, pain, and joints stiffness.
M.H. Pouriayevali, et al., 2019 [23]IranIranianOriginal articleSerological test (ELISA and PCR tests) and clinical symptomsNot mentioned Correlation between abroad travel history and CHIKV infection; also, Iran-5300 strain showed a rare non-synonymous substitution T/C at nucleotide 10,560.
Y. Bedoui et al., 2021 [18]FranceFrenchOriginal articleSerological test, RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, cytotoxicity assaysMethotrexate and dexamethasonePIC and CHIKV enhanced mRNA expression of COX-2; PIC increased the mRNA levels of cPLA2α and of mPGES-1, two other central enzymes in PGE2 production; IFNβ upregulated cPLA2α and COX-2 transcription levels; MTX failed to control the expression of all these enzymes, but dexamethasone was able to control the capacity of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
M. Agrawal et al., 2019 [33]IndiaIndianOriginal articleNot applicableNot applicableThe modulation of AKT3 induces the TNF-α-mediated autophagy and cytokine secretion. Additionally, AKT3 has been reported to act via PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, which activates the antiapoptotic genes and sensitizes the fibroblasts to TNF-α and TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. Therefore, during CHIKV infection, suppression of the robust inflammatory response may be regulated by the induction of hsa-miR-4717-3p through AKT3 gene target.
J. J. Hoarau et al., 2010 [34]FranceFrenchOriginal articleRT-PCR, Mac-ELISA, Clinical examinations and biological symptoms; PFU evaluation, immunochemistry and Western blot analysis MethotrexateCHIKV (mRNA and proteins) persisting in synovial macrophages could contribute to tissue injuries, apoptosis in vitro, fibrosis, and a polarized inflammatory response reminiscent of rheumatoid arthritis. The expression of immunoregulatory cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-β1, was demonstrated at T0 (time 0, considered before symptoms appearance) and M6 (Month 6).
M.d.R.Q. Lima et al., 2021 [35]BrazilBrazilianOriginal articleMac-ELISA, RT-PCRNot mentionedThe Euroimmun anti-CHIKV IgM ELISA test showed 100% sensitivity and 25.3% specificity due to cross reactivities observed with dengue. IgM positive and acute cases of dengue, the assay showed cross-reactivity of 46.7% and 31.6%, respectively, and so, molecular tests, such as RT-PCR, was used as an option to confirm cross-reactivity or not.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Carvalho Cardoso, R.; Rezende, B.; Alencar, A.K.N.; Fontes-Dantas, F.L.; Montes, G.C. Role of Arbovirus Infection in Arthritogenic Pain Manifestation—A Systematic Review. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7110390

AMA Style

de Carvalho Cardoso R, Rezende B, Alencar AKN, Fontes-Dantas FL, Montes GC. Role of Arbovirus Infection in Arthritogenic Pain Manifestation—A Systematic Review. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022; 7(11):390. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7110390

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Carvalho Cardoso, Rafaella, Bismarck Rezende, Allan Kardec Nogueira Alencar, Fabrícia Lima Fontes-Dantas, and Guilherme Carneiro Montes. 2022. "Role of Arbovirus Infection in Arthritogenic Pain Manifestation—A Systematic Review" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 7, no. 11: 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7110390

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop