Next Article in Journal
Pre-Clinical Proof-of-Concept Study of a Bladder Irrigation Feedback System for Gross Haematuria in a Lab Setup
Previous Article in Journal
UUX Evaluation of a Digitally Advanced Human–Machine Interface for Excavators
Article

Tolerance for Uncertainty and Patterns of Decision-Making in Complex Problem-Solving Strategies

Pedagogy and Medical Psychology Department, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119146, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2020, 4(3), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030058
Received: 26 June 2020 / Revised: 6 August 2020 / Accepted: 19 August 2020 / Published: 22 August 2020
Current studies of complex problem-solving do not commonly evaluate the regulatory role of such personality-based variables as tolerance for uncertainty, risk-readiness, and patterns for coping with decisional conflict. This research aims to establish the contribution of those traits into individual parameters of complex problem-solving strategies. The study was conducted on 53 healthy individuals 17 to 29 years old (M = 20.42; SD = 2.34). Our own computerized complex problem task “The Anthill” was developed for this research. We identified five measurable parameters of the participants’ problem-solving strategies: preferred orientational level (POL); orientational level variability (OLV); class quotas‘ range (R); mean and median quotas shift (MS and MeS); and abrupt changes of strategy (AC). Psychodiagnostic methods included: new questionnaire of tolerance/intolerance for uncertainty; personal decision-making factors questionnaire; Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire; Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale; Eysencks’ Impulsiveness Scale. The study showed the role of tolerance for uncertainty, risk-readiness, negative attitude toward uncertainty, and decision-making styles in the regulation of complex problem-solving strategies. Specifically, procrastination, tolerance for uncertainty, and risk-readiness were significant predictors of individual strategy indicators, such as POL, OLV, and MeS. Thus, personality traits were shown to regulate resource allocation strategies and the required level of orientation in a complex problem. View Full-Text
Keywords: tolerance for uncertainty; complex problem-solving; decision-making strategy tolerance for uncertainty; complex problem-solving; decision-making strategy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Epishin, V.; Bogacheva, N. Tolerance for Uncertainty and Patterns of Decision-Making in Complex Problem-Solving Strategies. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2020, 4, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030058

AMA Style

Epishin V, Bogacheva N. Tolerance for Uncertainty and Patterns of Decision-Making in Complex Problem-Solving Strategies. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2020; 4(3):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Epishin, Vitalii, and Nataliya Bogacheva. 2020. "Tolerance for Uncertainty and Patterns of Decision-Making in Complex Problem-Solving Strategies" Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4, no. 3: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030058

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop