Next Article in Journal
Preventing Violence and Social Exclusion through Sport and Physical Activity: The SAVE Project
Previous Article in Journal
The “Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology” Journal Club Series: Highlights on Recent Papers in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2018, 3(2), 24;

Exploring the Use of 3D Scanning to Determine Whole-Body Volume While Wearing a Triathlon Wetsuit

Department of Kinesiology & Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89101, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 February 2018 / Revised: 3 April 2018 / Accepted: 9 April 2018 / Published: 12 April 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [4380 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  


Background: Commercial 3 Dimension (3D) scanners are relatively new to anthropometry. The purpose of this study was to explore ability of using a 3D imaging instrument to measure body volume with and without wearing a wetsuit. Three experiments were conducted to achieve this purpose: (1) to determine if the 3D imaging instrument could accurately measure volume of static objects; (2) to determine the resolution of accuracy of measuring volume of static objects; and (3) to compare whole-body volume of wearing a wetsuit using 3D imaging as well as another body volume measure (air displacement technique). Methods: Three experiments were performed: (1) measurement of volume of a mannequin head and a box using a 3D scanner, water displacement (for mannequin head), and dimension measurements (for box) techniques for determining volume, (2) volume measurements of 1, 2, and 3 layers of neoprene to assess the resolution capabilities of the 3D scanner, and (3) body volume with and without wearing a wetsuit using a 3D scanner and BodPod (air displacement instrument). Results: (1) Mannequin head volume using the 3D scanner was 1.46% greater than a water displacement technique; the box volume from scanning was significantly greater than volume calculated by measuring dimensions of a box. (2) The volume of a single layer of neoprene was 25.3% less with scanning than the criterion; the volume of two layers was 27.2% less than the criterion; the volume of three layers was not significantly different from the criterion. (3) Body volume was not influenced by the interaction of wetsuit and device; body volume was on average 5% greater with wetsuit than without regardless of instrument. Conclusions: We demonstrated that body volume as measured by a 3D scanner increased when a wetsuit was worn. View Full-Text
Keywords: 3 Dimension (3D) scan; wetsuit fitting; anthropometrics 3 Dimension (3D) scan; wetsuit fitting; anthropometrics

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Barker, L.; Mendoza, D.; Mercer, J.A. Exploring the Use of 3D Scanning to Determine Whole-Body Volume While Wearing a Triathlon Wetsuit. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2018, 3, 24.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. EISSN 2411-5142 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top