Next Article in Journal
2-Stroke Scavenging in Conventional and Minimally-Modified 4-Stroke Engines for Heavy Duty Applications at Low to Medium Speeds
Previous Article in Journal
Change Point Detection for Diversely Distributed Stochastic Processes Using a Probabilistic Method
Open AccessArticle

The Impact of the Covariance Matrix Sampling on the Angle of Arrival Estimation Accuracy

1
School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK
2
Department of Communication and Informatics Engineering, Basra University College of Science and Technology, Basra 61004, Iraq
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inventions 2019, 4(3), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions4030043
Received: 1 July 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 6 August 2019 / Published: 8 August 2019
Several works show that the linear Angle of Arrival (AoA) methods such as Projection Matrix (PM) have low computational complexity compared to the subspace methods. Although the PM method is classified as a subspace method, it does not need decomposition of the measured matrix. This work investigates the effect of the sampled columns within the covariance matrix on the projection matrix construction. To the authors’ knowledge, this investigation has not been addressed in the literature. Unlike the subspace methods such as Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC), Estimation of Signal Parameters via Rotational Invariance Technique (ESPRIT), Minimum Norm, Propagator, etc., which have to use a specific number of columns, we demonstrate this aspect is not applicable in the PM method. To this end, the projection matrix is formed based on a various number of sampled columns to estimate the arrival angles. A theoretical analysis is accomplished to illustrate the relationship between the number of the sampled columns and the degrees of freedom (DOFs). The analysis shows that with the same aperture size, the DOFs can be increased by increasing only the number of sampled columns in the projection matrix calculation step. An intensive Monte Carlo simulation for different scenarios is presented to validate the theoretical claims. The estimation accuracy of the PM method, based on the proposed selected sampling methodology outperforms all the other techniques with less complexity compared to the Capon and MUSIC methods. The estimation accuracy is evaluated in terms of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Probability of Successful Detection (PSD). The results are presented and discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: AoA estimation; antenna array; computational complexity; covariance matrix sampling; projection matrix construction; signal processing AoA estimation; antenna array; computational complexity; covariance matrix sampling; projection matrix construction; signal processing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Sadoon, M.A.G.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A.; McEwan, N.J. The Impact of the Covariance Matrix Sampling on the Angle of Arrival Estimation Accuracy. Inventions 2019, 4, 43.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop